75
How to overcome test challenges in 400G/PAM-4 designs Keysight Presenters: Rob Sleigh Steve Reinhold February 15, 2017 © Keysight Technologies 2017

Keysight Presenters: 400G/PAM-4 designs Rob Sleigh …€¦ · •InfiniBand High Data Rate (HDR) –50/200/600 Gb/s •Several variants based on IEEE 802.3bs/cd and OIF CEI-56G IAs

  • Upload
    vukien

  • View
    245

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

How to overcome test challenges in 400G/PAM-4 designs

Keysight Presenters:

• Rob Sleigh

• Steve Reinhold

February 15, 2017

© Keysight Technologies 2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Agenda

• Introduction

o Why use Pulse Amplitude Modulation 4-Level (PAM-4)?

o Review Standards using PAM-4

• Output (Transmitter) Characterization

o Key Optical PAM-4 Measurements

o Key Electrical PAM-4 Measurements

• Input (Receiver) Characterization

• Summary

• Q&A

© Keysight Technologies 2017

2

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Why does the industry need PAM-4?

• NRZ > 28 Gb/s limits trace length

or increases cost

• PAM-4 packs 2 bits / symbol

• Halves the channel BW needs

• Allows designers to develop

products to fit cost structure of

available channel technologies.

Enables higher data throughput

• 4 amplitude levels

• 2 bits of information in every symbol

~ 2x throughput for the same Baud rate

28 GBaud PAM-4 = 56 Gb/s

• Lower SNR, more susceptible to noise

• More complex TX/RX design, higher cost

© Keysight Technologies 2017

3

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Challenges moving from NRZ to PAM-4Design and Measurement

• Packing 4 levels into amplitude swing of 2 – lose 9.6 dB SNR

• It is not just about timing jitter budgets anymore!

• Better management of noise and return loss

• Finite rise time creates inherent DDJ

• How to implement clock recovery?

• Closed eyes with lower SNR

• FEC often required

• ....

• ....

© Keysight Technologies 2017

4

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Current Draft Standards and IAs using PAM-4

• 200G/400G Ethernet (802.3bs) (Draft 3.0)

• 200GBASE-FR4/LR4 4 lanes of 26.5 Gbaud WDM on 1 SMF 2/10 km reach

200GBASE-DR4 4 lanes of 26.5 Gbaud PAM-4 on 4 SMF 500 m reach

• 400GBASE-FR8/LR8 8 lanes of 26.5 Gbaud WDM on 1 SMF 2/10 km reach

• 400GBASE-DR4 4 lanes of 53 Gbaud PAM-4 on 4 SMF 500 m reach

• 50G/100G/200G Ethernet (802.3cd) (Draft 1.2)

• 50GBASE-SR, 100GBASE-SR2, 200GBASE-SR4 1/2/4 MMF

• 50GBASE-FR, 50GBASE-LR 1 SMF CWDM

• 100GBASE-DR 1 SMF

• 64GFC Fibre Channel (PI-7)

• Several variants using both SMF and MMF

Optical

NEW !

© Keysight Technologies 2017

5

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

System Architectures - OpticalParallel vs WDM (Wavelength-division multiplexing)

• WDM (right) only requires one fiber, but requires more complex Tx/Rx (WD Mux/Demux)

• Unless otherwise specified, all Tx optical measurements performed through a short patch

cable (2m-5m)

Parallel Fiber Architecture

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th Nov 2016, page 294.WDM Architecture

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th Nov 2016, page 246.

© Keysight Technologies 2017

6

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Current Draft Standards and IAs using PAM-4

• Optical Internetworking Forum – Common Electrical Interface (CEI-56G-xxx)

• CEI-56G-XSR-PAM-4 chip to nearby chip using forwarded ref clock 100 mm

reach

• CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4 chip to chip, chip to module 150 mm reach with 1

connector

• 400G Ethernet (802.3bs) (Draft 3.0)

• 200GAUI-4 / 400GAUI-8 chip 2 chip, chip 2 module

(similar to CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4)

• 64GFC Fibre Channel (PI-7)

• Chip to chip and Chip to Module 150 mm reach,

based on CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4

• InfiniBand High Data Rate (HDR) – 50/200/600 Gb/s

• Several variants based on IEEE 802.3bs/cd and OIF CEI-56G IAs

Electrical – Chip-to-Chip (C2C), Chip-to-Module (C2M)

© Keysight Technologies 2017

7

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Current Draft Standards and IAs using PAM-4

• Optical Internetworking Forum – Common Electrical Interface (CEI-56G-xxx)

• CEI-56G-MR-PAM-4 chip to distant chip on same board 500 mm reach

• CEI-56G-LR-PAM-4 backplane/passive cable with 3 connectors 1 m reach

• 50G/100G/200G Ethernet (802.3cd D1.2)

• 50GBASE-CR, 100GBASE-CR2, 200GBASE-CR4 1/2/4 diff pairs of twinax

• 50GBASE-KR, 100GBASE-KR2, 200GBASE-KR4 1/2/4 lanes in backplane

• InfiniBand High Data Rate (HDR) – 50/200/600 Gb/s

• Several variants based on IEEE 802.3bs/cd and OIF CEI-56G IAs

• 1, 4, and 12 lanes

Electrical – copper cable, circuit board, and backplane

NEW !

© Keysight Technologies 2017

8

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Overview of IEEE P802.3bs™/D3.0, 10th January 2017PAM-4 used in 200 Gb/s and 400 Gb/s Operation

Name # of lanesChannel

(Medium)Reach

Signaling Rate

(each lane)

Modulation

FormatReference Receiver Defined in IEEE

200GBASE-DR44

Parallel FibresSM 2m to 500 m 26.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 121

200GBASE-FR44 WDM Lanes

(1 Fibre)SM 2m to 2 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 122

200GBASE-LR44 WDM Lanes

(1 Fibre)SM 2m to 10 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 122

200GAUI-8

(formerly CCAUI-8)8

Chip-to-Chip and

Chip-to-Module

~ 25 cm

10.2dB at 13.28 GHz26.5625 GBd NRZ

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzAnnex 120B/C

200GAUI-4

(formerly CCAUI-4)4

Chip-to-Chip and

Chip-to-Module

~ 25 cm

10.2dB at 13.28 GHz26.5625 GBd PAM4

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzAnnex 120D/E

400GBASE-SR1616

Parallel FibresMM 0.5 m to 100 m (OM4) 26.5625 GBd NRZ

TDEC with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 12.6 GHz

Eye Mask BW 19.38 GHz

Clause 123

400GBASE-DR44

Parallel FibresSM 2m to 500 m 53.125 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 38.68 GHzClause 124

400GBASE-FR88 WDM Lanes

(1 Fibre)SM 2m to 2 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 122

400GBASE-LR88 WDM Lanes

(1 Fibre)SM 2m to 10 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 122

400GAUI-16

(formerly CDAUI-16)16

Chip-to-Chip and

Chip-to-Module

~ 25 cm

10.2dB at 13.28 GHz26.5625 GBd NRZ

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzAnnex 120B/C

400GAUI-8

(formerly CDAUI-8)8

Chip-to-Chip and

Chip-to-Module

~ 25 cm

10.2dB at 13.28 GHz26.5625 GBd PAM4

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzAnnex 120D/E

IEEE

P8

02

.3b

s™ /

D2

.2 20

0 G

b/s

PH

Y

Op

tica

lEl

ect

rica

l

40

0 G

b/s

PH

Y

Op

tica

lEl

ect

rica

l

• Recent update (D3.0) includes changes to TDECQ and Jitter measurements

• Many “compliant” measurements require:

o Clock Recovery, Loop BW 4 MHz (all PAM-4)

o Reference Receiver with 4th Order Bessel-Thomson frequency response

© Keysight Technologies 2017 9

02/15/2017

IEE

E P

80

2.3

bs

™/ D

3.0

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Name # of lanesChannel

(Medium)Reach

Signaling Rate

(each lane)

Modulation

FormatReference Receiver Defined in IEEE

50GBASE-SR 1 Fibre MM Fibre0.5 m to 70 m for OM3

0.5 m to 100 m for OM426.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 12.6 GHzClause 138

50GBASE-FR 1 Fibre SM Fibre 2 m to 2 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 139

50GBASE-LR 1 Fibre SM Fibre 2 m to 10 km 26.5625 GBd PAM4TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 19.34 GHzClause 139

50GBASE-CR 1 Copper Cable > 3 m 26.5625 GBd PAM44th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 136

50GBASE-KR 1Electrical

Backplane30dB at 13.28125GHz 26.5625 GBd PAM4

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 137

100GBASE-DR 1 Fibre SM Fibre 2m to 500 m 53.125 GBd PAM4 TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 38.68 GHzClause 140

100GBASE-SR22

Parallel FibresMM Fibre

0.5 m to 70 m for OM3

0.5 m to 100 m for OM426.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 12.6 GHzClause 138

100GBASE-CR2 2 Copper Cable > 3 m 26.5625 GBd PAM44th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 136

100GBASE-KR2 2Electrical

Backplane30dB at 13.28125GHz 26.5625 GBd PAM4

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 137

Op

tica

l

200GBASE-SR44

Parallel FibresMM Fibre

0.5 m to 70 m for OM3

0.5 m to 100 m for OM426.5625 GBd PAM4

TDECQ with 4th Order BT filter,

BW 12.6 GHzClause 138

200GBASE-CR4 4 Copper Cable > 3 m 26.5625 GBd PAM44th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 136

200GBASE-KR4 4Electrical

Backplane35dB at 12.9GHz 26.5625 GBd PAM4

4th Order BT filter,

BW 33 GHzClause 137

Ele

ctri

cal

Op

tica

l

50

Gb

/s P

HY

IEEE

P8

02

.3cd

™ /

D1

.0

10

0 G

b/s

PH

Y

Op

tica

l

20

0 G

b/s

PH

Y

Ele

ctri

cal

Ele

ctri

cal

IEE

E P

80

2.3

cd

™ / D

1.1

Overview of IEEE P802.3cd™/ D1.2, 3rd February 2017PAM-4 used in 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, and 200 Gb/s Operation

• New proposal: 802.3cd adds support for 50/100/200 Gb/s for MM / SM / Copper Cable / Backplane applications

• Many “compliant” measurements require:

o Clock Recovery, Loop BW 4 MHz (all PAM-4)

o Reference Receiver with 4th Order Bessel-Thomson frequency response

NEW !

© Keysight Technologies 2017 10

02/15/2017

IEE

E P

80

2.3

cd

™/ D

1.2

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Understanding the application space

Typical implementation: Ethernet Switch using 400GBASE-FR8 Optical Link

Both IEEE and OIF-CEI are used

Line Card

Host

ASICRetimer

n

400G-FR8 Module

RetimerROSA

TOSA

400G-FR8 Module

RetimerROSA

TOSA

8

8

Backplane

n

Switch Card

Retimern

Switch

ASIC

400GAUI-8

8 x 26 GBd PAM-4

(8 x 56 Gb/s)

CEI-56G-MR

PAM-4 or NRZ

CEI-56G-LR

PAM-4 or eNRZ

CEI-56G-VSR

PAM-4 or NRZ

400GBASE-FR8

8 λ WDM in SMF

© Keysight Technologies 2017

11

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Patterns Test patterns for PAM-4 encoded signals defined in IEEE P802.3bs

• JP03A - The JP03A test pattern is a repeating

{0,3} sequence (clock)

– No longer used in 802.3bs/cd.

• JP03B - The JP03B test pattern is a repeating

sequence of {0,3} repeated 15 times followed by

{3,0} repeated 16 times (clock with a phase shift)

- No longer used in 802.3bs/cd

© Keysight Technologies 2017

12

02/15/2017

• PRBS13Q - The PRBS13Q test pattern is a repeating 8191-symbol sequence formed by Gray

coding pairs of bits from two repetitions of the PRBS13 pattern into PAM-4 symbols as described in

120.5.7. (Note: PRBS13Q is different from QPRBS13 defined in IEEE 802.3-2015 (bj) Clause 94)

• PRBS31Q - The PRBS31Q test pattern is a repeating 2^31-1 symbol sequence formed by Gray

coding pairs of bits from two repetitions of the PRBS31 pattern defined in 49.2.8 into PAM-4

symbols as described in 120.5.7.

• SSPRQ – Short Stress Pattern Random Quaternary.

The SSPRQ pattern is a repeating 2^16–1 PAM-4 symbol sequence. Comprised of 4 sequences,

each based key “stressors” from PRBS31. Stressful pattern, but short enough to use advanced

analysis tools available on today’s T&M tools (e.g. Equalization, Jitter/Noise analysis, etc.)

PAM4 Test Patterns

Pattern Pattern Description Defined in Clause

Square Wave Square wave (8 threes, 8 zeros) 120.5.11.2.4

3 PRBS31Q 120.5.11.2.2

4 PRBS13Q 120.5.11.2.1

5 Scrambled Idle 119.2.4.9

6 SSPRQ 120.5.11.2.3

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Receiver Frequency Response:

4th Order Bessel-Thomson (BT) Response

Typical RT

“Brick wall”

Response

Typical SS

Response

Scopes have different frequency responses

Will result in different eye/waveform shapes

and amplitudes

–> different measurement results!

Examples:

• IEEE P802.3bs™/D3.0, 10th January 2017Clause 120D.3.1 200GAUI-4 or 400GAUI-8 transmitter characteristics:

“A test system with a fourth-order Bessel-Thomson low-pass response with 33

GHz 3 dB bandwidth is to be used for all transmitter signal measurements,

unless otherwise specified.”

To provide more consistency, most standards now specify BW and shape.

• CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4

Section 16.3.4 Output Differential Voltage, pk-pk“The waveform is observed through a fourth-order Bessel-Thomson response

with a 3-dB bandwidth of 40 GHz using a QPRBS13-CEI pattern.”

Compliant Frequency Response (Reference Receiver)

Step Response (red)

Frequency Response (blue)

© Keysight Technologies 2017

13

02/15/2017

To achieve 33/40 GHz 4th Order BT response

on a RT scope, must start with > 60 GHz

“brick wall” response

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Clock Recovery for PAM-4 DesignsClock Recovery (CR)• Recovers a clock for the Rx to use, tracks out some

low-frequency jitter

• Scopes need to emulate CR used in Rx used to

track out low-frequency jitter, trigger the scope

PAM-4 adds potential complexity• Data pattern affects transition density

• Transitions no longer only at 0V vdiff

• DSP and analog CDR solutions common

• OIF-CEI proposal:

o 1 detector: 0V crossing

o allow all edges that cross to be counted

• CR Loop BW reduced from 10 MHz to ~ 4 MHz

(IEEE 802.3bs/cd and CEI-56G-PAM-4)

Instrument Clock Recovery

• Real-time oscilloscopes use software CR

• Transition level qualified SW CDR

will include 0-3/3-0 and 1-2/2-1 level transitions.

• Sampling oscilloscopes use hardware CR

• Existing Keysight HW clock recovery designs

work on PAM-4 signals

© Keysight Technologies 2017

14

02/15/2017

Output (Transmitter) Characterization: Optical

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs © Keysight Technologies 2017

16

02/15/2017

A quick review of legacy 25 GBd NRZ Tx Test…

• OMA (optical modulation

amplitude, difference

between the 1 level and 0 level)

• Extinction ratio

(ratio of 1 and 0 level)

• Tx Eye mask

• Transmitter and Dispersion Penalty

(TDP)

What are the key NRZ Tx

parameters that get measured?

IEEE 100GBASE-LR4/ER4 Tx Parameters

Reference: IEEE 802.3-2015_SECTION6 Clause 78-95, page 326

IEEE 802.3

participants can

access the latest

specs on the IEEE

website.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

What is TDP and what are its challenges?

© Keysight Technologies 2017

17

02/15/2017

Transmitter and Dispersion Penalty

Reference: IEEE 802.3-2015_SECTION4 Clause 44-55, page 513

TDP is the primary spec that defines inter-operability, but it is complex,

expensive and time consuming to perform.

TDP is very often characterized on early units, and is then correlated to

Extinction Ratio, OMA, and Eye Mask. ER, OMA and eye mask are

then tested in manufacturing.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Overview of Key Optical PAM-4 MeasurementsUsed in multiple IEEE 802.3bs/cd Clauses

© Keysight Technologies 2017

18

02/15/2017

• Outer Optical Modulation Amplitude

• Outer Extinction Ratio

• Transmitter and dispersion eye closure

for PAM-4 (TDECQ)

IEEE 400GBASE-FR8/LR8 Tx Parameters

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D3.0, 10th January 2017, page 252.

Do you notice anything missing compared to

legacy NRZ Tx Specs?

What are the key PAM-4 Tx

parameters that get measured?

IEEE 802.3

participants

can access the

latest draft

specs on the

802.3 website.

No Tx mask test!

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

PAM-4: OMA and Extinction Ratio

• Extinction ratio measurement is made

on specific bits in a specific pattern

(outer levels of PRBS13Q or SSPRQ)

• OMA is constructed from the same

symbols and values as extinction ratio

• OMA = P3 – Po (Average Power)

• ER = Ave Power P3 / Ave Power Po(Ratio measurement in dB)

• Newer T&M software provides these

optical measurements directly

(Keysight 86100D-9FP/9TP,

integrated into FlexDCA FW)Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.1, 6th October 2016, page 223.

© Keysight Technologies 2017

19

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Transmitter and dispersion eye closure for PAM-4 (TDECQ)

© Keysight Technologies 201720

02/15/2017

Where:

Qt = 3.414 (target SER)

R = noise term

• TDECQ is a measure of each optical transmitter's vertical eye closure when transmitted

through a worst case optical channel (TDECQ units = dB) using SSPRQ pattern.

Equalizer

(5 tap, T/2 spaced, FFE)

Reference Receiver: 4th order Bessel-Thomson low-pass filter

(Oscilloscope noise measured and mathematically ‘backed out’

per Standard).

CR PLL BW 4 MHz, Slope 20 dB/dec

(1st Order, no peaking)

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th November 2016, Figure 121-5, Page 226.

86100D DCA-X Scope

Generate SSPRQ

pattern (~ 2^16 symbols)

Targeted samples on

PAM-4 eye diagram.

• MM: 12.6 GHz BW (26.56 GBd)

o No Pol. controller, fiber

• SM: 19.34 GHz BW (26.56 GBd)

• SM: 38.68 GHz BW (53 GBd)

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Keysight TDECQ implementation

© Keysight Technologies 2017

21

02/15/2017

Option 9FP / 9TP (includes all PAM-4 measurements), Option TFP / TTP (only TDEC and TDECQ)

• TDECQ equalizer

function:

o Designed according

to IEEE 802.3bs

o Uses SSPRQ test

pattern required by

802.3bs standard

(but SW will operate

on other patterns too)

• Automatically optimizes

tap settings to minimize

TDECQ value

o Supports user tap

values also

• Preserves uncorrelated

signal content as

required by IEEE 802.3bs

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

TDECQ measurement setup

• Simple and fast: Two clicks

to execute the measurement

• OMA required for the TDECQ

calculation:

• OMA is measured

according to 802.3bs

• Alternatively, OMA can be

made on a separate

measurement and applied

to the TDECQ calculation

© Keysight Technologies 2017

22

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

TDECQ, OMA and ER all available from the TDECQ process

• Extinction ratio and

OMA are derived from

the 0 and 3 levels of the

transmitter output

• Specific bit

sequences are used

• TDECQ derived from

the equalized waveform

• Uses OMA from the

unequalized

waveform (may

change to equalized

waveform)

Waveform at transmitter output

Waveform at equalizer output

© Keysight Technologies 2017 23

02/15/2017

Keysight TDECQ solution: Simple, integrated,

fast, accurate, and very repeatable.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Early TDECQ Findings

© Keysight Technologies 2017

24

02/15/2017

Consistent trend in measured

TDECQ change and BER penalty

Measured TDECQ vs. Tx BW

TDECQ degrades with a reduction

in Tx BW

Correlation between BER Penalty

and TDECQ

• TDECQ appears to be a valid method to predict BER performance

Results from a joint experiment performed by Keysight/Intel/MACOM reported to IEEE 802.3cd.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

53 Gbaud (106 Gb/s/PRBS13Q) Optical PAM-4 analysis

23 GHz with FRC (-3000)

33 GHz with FRC (-3000)

© Keysight Technologies 2017

25

02/15/2017

Measured using Keysight 86116C Optical Module (Option 041/IRC)

25.8 GHz TX BW 14.5 GHz TX BW

TDECQ = 0.73 dB

TDECQ = 2.58 dB

TDECQ degrades with a reduction in Tx BW

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs © Keysight Technologies 2017

26

02/15/2017

Keysight Oscilloscope Solutions for Optical TestFull coverage for all optical PAM-4 applications (using existing DCA HW solutions).

N1092A/B/D “DCA-M”

• 20-28 GBd optical channels

• Multimode and Single-Mode

• 1, 2 or 4 channels

• Highest sensitivity on the market

(lowest noise receiver)

• Fastest sampling combined with 160fs

typical trigger jitter

• Lowest cost solution

• “Ideal” frequency response (SIRC)

• PAM-4 analysis with TDECQ

(Option 9FP/9TP)

86100D DCA-X with

86105D/86115D module

86100D DCA-X with

86116C module

• 8.5 GBd to 28 GBd

• Multimode and Single-Mode

• 1 or 2 @ 34 GHz optical channels

(1 to 4 optical per mainframe)

• 1 @ 50 GHz Electrical Channel

• “Ideal” frequency response (SIRC)

• < 100 fs rms timebase jitter

(86100D-PTB)

• PAM-4 analysis with TDECQ

(Option 9FP/9TP)

• 25/26/28GBd or 53/56 GBd

• Single-Mode

• 1 @ optical channel per module

• 1 @ 80 GHz Electrical Channel

• “Ideal” frequency response (SIRC)

• < 100 fs rms timebase jitter

(86100D-PTB)

• PAM-4 analysis with TDECQ

(Option 9FP/9TP)

N1077A CR provides compliant electrical/optical (SM/MM) clock recovery to 32 GBd.

New

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Keysight Real-time oscilloscope with O/E front-end

© Keysight Technologies 2017

27

02/15/2017

• Keysight N7004A 33 GHz O/E converter

A fully-integrated optical-to-electrical (O/E)

converter for measuring up to 28 GBd optical

signals using Infiniium real-time scopes.

o Compatible with Infiniium V-Series,

90000X/Q, and Z Series.

• System level R&D debug and troubleshooting

• Scope SW includes built-in optical

measurements

• Reference receiver testing (filtered

response) and unfiltered characterization of

optical transmitters

Output (Transmitter) Characterization: Electrical

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Key Electrical Measurements

© Keysight Technologies 2017

IEEE 802.3bs Annex 120D 200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8

29

02/15/2017

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D3.0, 10th January 2017, page 352.

IEEE 802.3

participants

can access

the latest

draft specs

on the 802.3

website.

• Output waveform

o Level Separation Mismatch Ratio

• Signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio

(SNDR)

• Output Jitter

o Jrms

o J4

o Even-Odd Jitter (EOJ)

What are the key PAM-4 Tx

parameters that get measured?

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Transmitter Linearity at TP0a (IEEE)

• How evenly spaced are the PAM-4

levels?

• Significant change in definition from IEEE

802.3bj (100GBase-KP4) Clause 94

• Defined as a function of the mean signal

level transmitted for each PAM-4 symbol

level.

© Keysight Technologies 2017

120D.3.1.2 Level Separation Mismatch Ratio, RLM (200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8)

30

02/15/2017

RLM = min ((3 x ES1), (3 x ES2), (2 – 3 x ES1), (2 – 3 x ES2)

V0

V1

V2

V3

Vmid

Measurement Setup:• Receiver: 4th Order Bessel-Thomson low-pass

filter with 33 GHz BW

• CR PLL BW 4 MHz and a slope of 20 dB/decade

• Tested using PRBS13Q

(no longer uses the stair-step pattern)ES = Effective Symbol Level

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs © Keysight Technologies 2017 31

02/15/2017

Signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SNDR)

Procedure:

1. Measured at the output of TX with all lanes enabled

2. Capture PRBS13Q waveform (lane under test)

3. Import into math program and perform matrix math

a. Compute:

i. Linear fit pulse response, p(k)

o Pmax is the max value of p(k)

ii. Linear fit error waveform, e(k)

o σe is the standard deviation of e(k)

b. Measure RMS deviation from mean voltage on the

flattest portion of at least 6 consecutive PAM-4 symbols

i. Compute σn

c. Calculate SNDR

IEEE P802.3bs™/D3.0, 10th January 2017, Clause 120D.3.1.6

Measurement Setup:• Receiver: 4th Order Bessel-Thomson low-pass filter with 33 GHz BW

• CR PLL BW 4 MHz and a slope of 20 dB/decade

• Note - SNDR is very sensitive to noise measurement (ensure to use a low noise scope)

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Sample 1

Sample 2

Amplitude Jitter

© Keysight Technologies 2017 32

02/15/2017

Output Jitter at TP0a200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8 transmitter characteristics at TP0a

Measurement Setup:• Receiver: 4th Order Bessel-Thomson low-pass filter with 33 GHz BW

• CR PLL BW 4 MHz and a slope of 20 dB/decade

• Keysight plans to implement an optimized test methodology after the

Standard becomes more stable.

• New jitter measurement methodology

o First defined in IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2,

28th November 2016

o Accounts for Tx designs that use different clock

buffers (uncorrelated jitter) for MSB and LSB

• J4 and JRMS jitter

o Measure RJ/PJ on 12 specific transitions using

a PRBS13Q pattern (exclude correlated jitter).

o Rise: 0 to 3, 1 to 2, 0 to 1, 2 to 3, 0 to 2, 1 to 3

o Fall: 3 to 0, 2 to 1, 1 to 0, 3 to 2, 2 to 0, 3 to 1

• Even-Odd Jitter (EOJ)

o Measured on PRBS13Q (3 repeats)

o Max from measurements on all 12 edges

Under

Development

in ad hoc

group

PAM4

TX

Edge ModelAmplitude-to-Time

(Jitter) transfer function

~ 100% efficiency

PAM4

Ideal edge position

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Key Electrical PAM-4 Measurements at TP1a

Key New/Updated Measurements:

• Eye Symmetry Mask Width

• Eye Height, differential

• Transition Time (20%-80%)

Annex 120E, Chip-to-Module, measured at TP1a (200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8)

Measurement Setup:

• Receiver: 4th Order Bessel-Thomson low-pass filter with 33 GHz BW

• Clock Recovery: 4MHz, slope 20db/dec

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th November 2016, page 369

© Keysight Technologies 2017 33

02/15/2017

IEEE 802.3

participants

can access

the latest

draft specs

on the

802.3

website.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Eye symmetry mask width (ESMW) at TP1a

• ESMW verifies proper timing/alignment

of all 3 eyes (skew)

• Determine center of middle eye

(TCmid) using 10E-3

• 10–5 horizontal openings of the middle

eye at VCmid, the upper eye at VCupp,

and of the lower eye at VClow must all

extend beyond the EW5 mask.

C2m, 200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8 at TP1a, Reference 120E.4.2

Upper, Middle, and Lower eye

must extend beyond “mask”

Measurement Setup:

• Ref Rcvr: 4th order BT, 33 GHz BW

• CR: 4 MHz BW, 20dB/dec

• Use CTLE (3 pole)

• PRBS13Q pattern

VCmid

VCupp

VClow

© Keysight Technologies 2017 34

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Host output eye height (TP1a)

120E.3.1.6 Host output eye width and eye height

• Measure EW of all 3 PAM-4 eyes @ 1E-5

using methodology outlined in 120E.4.2

C2m, 200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8 at TP1a, EW Reference 120E.4.2

Measurement Setup:

• Ref Rcvr: 4th order BT, 33 GHz BW

• CR: 4 MHz BW, 20dB/dec

• Use CTLE (3 pole) defined in 120E.3.1.7

• PRBS13Q pattern

© Keysight Technologies 2017 35

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Transition Times at TP1aDefined in Annex 120E (120E.3.1.5)

• Use PRBS13Q pattern

• Measure on isolated 0 -> 3 and 3 -> 0

• 000333 (rise) and 333000 (fall)

• 20-80% transition times (rise and fall time)

• Measured using 33 GHz LPF (“such as Bessel-Thomson response”)

Use FlexDCA’s “Find Bit Sequence”

feature to quickly locate the correct edge

-1/3

-1

+1/3

+1

1

0

2

3

Gray

Code

Level

PAM-4

Symbol

© Keysight Technologies 2017 36

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Key Electrical PAM-4 Measurements at TP4

Key New/Updated Measurements:

• Near-end and Far-end

o Eye Symmetry Mask Width (ESMW)

o Eye Width and Eye Height @ 1E-5

Annex 120E, Chip-to-Module, measured at TP4 (200GAUI-4 and 400GAUI-8 )

Measurement Setup:• Receiver: 4th Order Bessel-Thomson low-pass filter with 33 GHz BW

• Clock Recovery: 4MHz, slope 20db/dec

Reference: IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th November 2016, page 373/4

© Keysight Technologies 2017 37

02/15/2017

IEEE

members

can access

the latest

draft specs

on the IEEE

website.

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Host output eye width and eye height (TP4)

120E.3.2.1 Module output eye width and eye height

• Measure EW/EH of all 3 PAM-4 eyes @ 1E-5

using methodology outlined in 120E.4.2

o Measure Near-end EW5/EH5 (with Max 3dB CTLE peaking)

o Measure Far-end after convolving with loss channel

(~ 6.4 dB loss at Nyquist defined in 92.10.7.1.1,

use any CTLE per Table 120E-2 (max 9dB)

Hmid

Vmid

HuppVupp

HlowVlow

Reference:

Center of Middle Eye

CTLE

Calculate

EW5/EH5

spec herePost process

Measure here (TP4)

• Measurement Setup:

o Reference Rcvr: 4th order BT, 33 GHz BW

o CR: 4 MHz BW, 20dB/dec

o Use CTLE (3 pole)

defined in 120E.3.1.7

o PRBS13Q pattern Loss channel

© Keysight Technologies 2017 38

02/15/2017

Input

(TP4)

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4 Very Short Reach (VSR) InterfaceWorking draft dated June 3, 2016

Overview:

• 56 Gb/s chip-to-module PAM-4 electrical

interface (18.0 to 29.0 Gsym/s)

• Up to 10.0 dB loss at the Nyquist

frequency, including one connector.

• Drives 100 mm (min) of host PCB trace

plus one connector and 50 mm (min) of

module PCB trace.

• Raw BER of 1E-6 per lane; FEC

corrects to 1E-15 or better.

CEI-56G has similar PAM-4

measurements and methodologies

to those defined in IEEE 802.3bs.

Examples include:

• Eye Width (1E-6)

• Eye Height (1E-6)

• SNDR

• Transition Times

• Eye Symmetry Mask Width

• Eye Linearity (2 methods)

© Keysight Technologies 2017 39

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

16.3.10.1 Eye Width and Eye Height test at TP1A, TP4

• Xtalk required on all co-/counter-propagating lanes;

use QPRBS13-CEI, or QPRBS31-CEI, or a

valid CEI signal.

• Test Pattern = QPRBS13-CEI

• CRU = 1st order with fb/6640 3dB BW (same as IEEE 802.3bs) e.g. 26.56 GBd/6640 = 4 MHz

• Apply Reference CTLE

• Near-end EW6, EH6(CTLE TP1a max 9 dB, TP4 max 2 dB)

• Far-end EW6, EH6 – convolves emulated test

channel, ~7 dB loss at fb/2 (CTLE max 9 dB)

EW6 and EH6 for Host and Module output

Figure 16-7: TP1a and TP4 Eye Width, Eye Height

and Eye Amplitude

Reference: Working draft of oif2014.230.09, dated

Nov 18, 2016, page 16.

• Reference Point for all EW6/EH6:

Tmid = the midpoint of the maximum horizontal

eye opening of the 1E-3 inner eye contour of

the middle eye

© Keysight Technologies 2017 40

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

• Transmitter Linearity – defined as a function of the mean signal level

transmitted for each PAM-4 symbol (CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4 Appendix 16.C.4.3)

• Same equation as that used in IEEE P802.3bs™/D2.2, 28th November 2016

(Refer to Level Separation Mismatch Ratio, RLM)

• Used in other CEI Clauses (not VSR-PAM-4)

• RLM = min((3 x ES1), (3 x ES2), (2 - 3 x ES1), (2 - 3 x ES2))

Transmitter Linearity

• Eye Linearity (Section 16.C.4.2)

– ratio of min to max PAM-4 eye amplitudes

• Used at TP1A and TP4

• Eye linearity = min(AVupp, AVmid, AVlow)

max(AVupp, AVmid, AVlow)

Two Methods defined in CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4, Nov 18, 2016

Reference: Working draft of oif2014.230.09, Nov 18, 2016, page 32.

ES = Effective Symbol Level

Reference: Figure 16-7 from oif2014.230.09,

dated Nov 18, 2016, page 16.

© Keysight Technologies 2017 41

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Keysight Electrical SolutionsUsed to characterize/troubleshoot PAM-4 Electrical Tx Designs

42

02/15/2017© Keysight Technologies 2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Symbol Error Ratio Measurements (BER/SER) using RT Scope

Navigate easily to

the occurrence of

each symbol error

View waveform and locate errors. Troubleshoot Reed-Solomon FEC failures.

Cumulative

SER/BER

Identifies

Burst Errors in

Captured

Waveforms

© Keysight Technologies 2017 43

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

PAM-4 Analysis SW options for Keysight real-time and

sampling scope platforms:

• 86100D-9FP for the 86100D DCA-X

Built-in PAM-4 Measurement Capability

We are actively updating PAM-4 algorithms as the Standards evolve.

Updates will be included in future FW releases.

• N8827A/B PAM-4 Analysis Software

for RT scopes

© Keysight Technologies 2017 44

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

PAM-4 Measurement Apps for Keysight Scopes“Pre-Compliance” SW Apps for emerging Standards using PAM-4

• N1085A PAM-4 Measurement App

for Ethernet and OIF-CEI

(for the 86100D DCA-X)

• N8836A PAM-4 Measurement App

for Ethernet and OIF-CEI

(for Infiniium real-time scopes)

We are actively updating PAM-4 algorithms as the Standards evolve.

Updates will be included in future SW releases.

© Keysight Technologies 2017 45

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Keysight Oscilloscope Solutions - Electrical

Electrical – Sampling Scope(includes built-in clock recovery and precision timebase)

Keysight 86100D DCA-X with 86108B• Channels: 2

• Bandwidth: 50 GHz

• Jitter: <45 fs rms typ.

• Electrical Clock Recovery – integrated HW Clock Recovery

works with PAM-N signals up to 32 Gbaud

• 86100D-9FP PAM-4 Analysis SW

(works with any DCA module, optical or electrical)

• N1085A PAM-4 “Pre-Compliance” SW

• NOTE – 75 / 85 / 100+ GHZ BW remote head modules

also available.

Electrical – Real-time Scope

Keysight DSO Z-Series• Channels 2-4

• Bandwidth: up to 63 GHz

• Sample Rate: Up to 160 GSa/s

• PAM-4 Serial Data Analysis Wizard

• Software Clock Recovery (specify transitions for CR)

• N8827A/B PAM-4 Analysis SW

• N8836A PAM-4 “Pre-Compliance” SW

• PAM-4 SER/BER “Error Capture” and “Decode”

capabilities using single-shot capture

© Keysight Technologies 2017 46

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Comparing the impact of a scope’s intrinsic random noise (RN) on 56 GBaud (112 Gb/s) PAM-4 signals

Real-time scope

(63 GHz Z-Series)

Equivalent-time scope

(86100D DCA-X)

RN = random noise

S = Slew Rate, dV/dt

© Keysight Technologies 2017 47

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Oscilloscope Solutions for 100G/400GVerification Compliance Manufacturing

Chip

Board

Level

Syste

mR&D

Sampling Scopes (SS), “DCA”

Best for validating/characterizing PAM-4 designs

Real-time Scopes (RT)

Best for troubleshooting PAM-4 designs

The most versatile tool for all areas of

high-speed digital communications

• Best for troubleshooting

• Captures one-time (glitch) events

• No explicit trigger required

• Does not require repetitive signals for

pattern waveform measurements.

• N7004A Optical-to-Electrical Converter

• N8827A/B PAM-4 Analysis SW

• N8836A PAM-4 “Pre-Compliance” SW

• PAM-4 SER/BER “Error Capture” and

“Decode” capabilities

For applications that place top priority on

waveform precision.

• Highest Fidelity Low noise

Ultra-low jitter

High Bandwidth

Highest Resolution (14-16 bits)

• Modular Platform Electrical

Optical

TDR/TDT

• Lowest price for same BW

• 86100D-9FP PAM-4 Analysis SW

• N1085A PAM-4 “Pre-Compliance” SW

© Keysight Technologies 2017 48

02/15/201702/15/2017

PAM-4 Receiver Test

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

PAM-4 Receiver Test Challenges

50© Keysight Technologies 2017

─ Transmitter Equalization

─ Level Non-linearity:

─ Input Linearity Testing

─ Linearity Margin Testing

─ BER vs. Symbol levels

─ Long (Q)PRBS(Q) patterns

─ Stressed Input Test for Host & Module

─ Receiver Interference Tolerance

─ Loop Closure for RX Tolerance Testing

─ NRZ and PAM-4 signaling on same RX input

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: PAM-4 TX Equalization

51

© Keysight Technologies 2017

– TX EQ pre-distorts the transmitter output to emphasize the high frequency portions of the signal and/or

de-emphasize the low frequency portions

– PAM-4 signaling makes TX equalization even more important due to intrinsic DDJ and reduced SNR

– 32 Gbaud PAM-4 Eye before and after channel:

Channel

Channel

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: PAM-4 Input Linearity Test

• CEI standard defines a new input test for PAM-4: ability to tolerate level

non-linearities, current draft proposes eye amplitudes of up to 0.67 AMax.

• But when using a 2 channel pattern generator with PAM-4 combiner, the

resulting levels cannot not be varied individually. What to do?

52

© Keysight Technologies 2017

PAM-4 eyes can show a level

separation mismatch:

0.67 AMax

A Max

This setup does not work

here:

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Linearity margin test

• Margin test steps through increasing degrees of stress until link failure

• (BER worse than target for FEC, - not error free)

• Design the stress to emulate the impairment

• Two general linearity impairment classes in PAM-4

1. DAC bit weighting error

2. Compression/Expansion in linear stage

53

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: BER vs Symbol Level

• Receiver circuits can exhibit non-linearity effects similar to TX effects

• Understanding the BER vs. Symbol level performance of the receiver is

important

• Varying PG TX signal levels to compensate for these RX effects can

reduce the time to debug link BER issues

54

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Long (Q)PRBS(Q) patterns

55

– NRZ BERT architectures have memory-based pattern length limitations when

applied to PAM-4 signaling

– QPRBS31/PRBS31Q will not fit in pattern memory

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Stressed Input Test for Host & Module

56

Example: OIF CEI-56G-VSR-PAM-4

Challenges:

‒ Compensate loss TP4a

‒ Emulate TX de-emphasis

‒ PRBS31 for NRZ

‒ QPRBS13 or ? for PAM-4

How to inject simultaneously

and calibrate mix of

‒ What is UBHPJ? (BUJ)

‒ What is UUGJ? (RJ)

‒ SJ is multi-UI LF SJ and

HF SJ up to 200MHz

Generally: CEI 4.0 56G draft specs keep changing till finally released!

Note: the validity

of emulating the

effect of the

DUT‘s counter

opposing output

during test via

TCB is

questionable (the

coupling is not

defined)!

Challenges:

How to emulate

x-talk?

‒ Fast tr

‒ Asynchronous

or

synchronous

with phase

control?

ISI channel (channel loss

depends on distance)

© Keysight Technologies 2017

Reference: OIF VEI-56G-VSR-PAMR Very Short Reach Interface, draft Nov 18, 2016 p20

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

The ISI channel emulates the frequency

dependent loss of a backplane channel.

Test Challenge: Receiver Interference Tolerance

57

COM Method referenced by OIF CEI-56G-LR/MR-PAM-4 (draft)

Challenge: the transmitter output, as measured

at TP0a, meets all transmitter specifications:

• Pre- and post- cursor peaking ratio

as of CEI-56G-LR-PAM-4

The Channel Operating Margin (COM) is a figure of merit for a channel derived from a measurement of its

scattering parameters. COM is related to the ratio of a calculated signal amplitude to a calculated noise amplitude =

20log10(As/Ani). Source: IEEE 802.3bj™-2014, Annex 93A

The channel noise

source emulates

crosstalk and non-

equalize-able signal

distortions introduced

by a channel.

It is Gaussian with a

crest factor of at least

4.

Challenge:

Differential

adders cause

loss +skew

+reflections.

Challenge: get all data needed for MATLAB

COM model input file to calculate desired eye

height correctly.

0.1- 0.5

© Keysight Technologies 2017

Reference: IEEE 802.3-2015

Annex 93C – Figure 93C-2

Interference tolerance test

setup

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Loop Closure for RX Tolerance

58

– “Loopback” to BERT error detector is traditional method

– Some DUT’s do not have loopback capability

– Some DUT’s incorporate on-chip error detectors

– Some interfaces operate at high BER levels (e.g. 1E-5) and correct with FEC

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: NRZ and PAM-4 on same RX input

59

© Keysight Technologies 2017

•Some SERDES receivers have flexible RX inputs that can be used for both

PAM-4 and NRZ signaling

•NRZ BERT architectures require significant recabling/recalibration when

changing from NRZ to PAM-4

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

M8040A 64 GBaud High-performance BERT

Key capabilities:

- Highly integrated BERT, AXIe based

- Accurate physical layer characterization and

compliance test of next generation digital high-

speed I/Os with NRZ and PAM-4 data formats

- Control via M8070A system software for M8000

Pattern Generator (M8045A)

‒ Single or dual 32/64 GBaud NRZ/PAM-4

‒ Built-in de-emphasis

‒ Clean and jittered data patterns and clocks

‒ Remote head for close connection to DUT

‒ NRZ and PAM-4 is switchable by software

Error Detector (M8046A)

‒ 32/64* GBaud error detector for PAM-4 and NRZ

‒ * second release

Where used:

- 400GbE, 200GbE, CEI-56G

- Input (RX) characterization and

compliance test

- For PAM-4 and NRZ signals up to 64

GBaud

60

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: PAM-4 TX Equalization Solved

61

Using M8045A Pattern Generator 4-tap TXEQ controls

© Keysight Technologies 2017

Channel

Channel

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: PAM-4 Input Linearity Test and Linearity Margin Test Solved

62

Using M8045A Pattern Generator PAM-4 symbol 1 and 2 level controls

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs 63

Using M8046A Error Detector BER vs. symbol level analysis window

All errors found on

level 3 © Keysight Technologies 2017

Test Challenge: BER vs Symbol Level Solved

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Long (Q)PRBS(Q) patterns Solved

64

Using M8046A Error Detector native PAM-4 analysis

Data In

Detecting 1 0

Threshold Vupp = 3 = 0 or 1 or 2?

Threshold Vmid = 2 or 3? = 0 or 1?

Threshold Vlow = 1 or 2 or 3? = 0

3

0

1

2

PAM-4 Vupp Vmid Vlow Gray

3 1 1 1 1 0

2 0 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 1 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0

Only a true PAM-4 error analyzer can provide a PAM-4 symbol error rate. Error ratios down to 10-15 or error-free can be measured even for long PRBS 2 31-1 or QPRBS-31 patterns. Errored 0,1,2,3 symbols can be counted seperately for further debugging.

M8046A samples all three PAM-4 thresholds simultaneously

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Stressed Input Test for Host & Module Solved

65

Using M8045A flexible jitter sources and second PG

channel for crosstalk

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Receiver Interference Tolerance Solved

66

Inpu

t

(RX)

und

er

test

Loopback to ED PAM-4 and NRZ

diffPAM-4 or NRZRemote

head

M8196A complements input test setup

when used as:

‒ Random/ sinusoidal interference source

with directional couplers

‒ PAM-4 generator to emulate horizontally

skewed eyes

‒ Economic PAM-4 generator (see appendix

for restrictions)

+

Option to use AWG for RI/SI source, eye-skew

RI/SI

Using M8195A or -96A AWG as RI/SI source in same chassis, same GUI

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: Loop Closure for RX Tolerance Solved 1

67

Using M8046A Error Detector for DUT’s with loopback

Input (RX)

under test

2

PAM-4 or

NRZ Remote head

Loopback to EDPAM-4 or NRZ

2

Key features analyzer:

− 1 analyzer channel per module (M8046A, 1U)

− Symbol rates:

− 2 to 32 Gb/s NRZ and 32 GBaud PAM-4

− 2 to 64 Gb/s NRZ and 64 GBaud PAM-4*

− Detects NRZ and PAM-4 signals without power splitters

− True real-time symbol error rate for PAM-4 without post-processing

− Full sampling even for long PRBS and low BERs, e.g.10-15

− Jitter tolerance measurements

*64 Gbaud version comes in a second release

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

2: On-chip error counters:

‒ On chip ED can be used for

integrated measurements,

such as JTOL

‒ M8070A-1TP/-1NP are

available as transportable

and as network license

‒ Python-script based interface

into M8070A software

68

Access via M8070A Software:3: Realtime Scope based error

counters:

– For BERs 10-5, 10-6, 10-7

– Unfold into waveform upon error

– Trigger on burst error

– Cumulative and „per acquisition“

– Unknown expected pattern by

capture

– Requires Infiniium SW rev. 5.60

and N8836A

DUT

error

counter

Python

Update Aug 2016

Test Challenge: Loop Closure for RX Tolerance Solved 2,3

© Keysight Technologies 2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Test Challenge: NRZ and PAM-4 on same DUT-Solved!

69

Using M8040A Native NRZ/PAM-4 Capabilities – switch PG/ED on the fly

Custom

coding

too!

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

M8000 Series of BER Test Solutions

Master your next design

Highly integrated

and scalable for simplified,

time efficient testing

Now: Extension to 400GbE:

PAM-4 & NRZ, 64 GBaud

M8040A PAM-4 and NRZ

64 GBaud, 1-2 channel

16 Gb/s J-BERT M8020A

1 - 4 channel 32 Gb/s J-BERT M8020A

and M8062A

M8000 Series of BER Test Solutions

M8195A AWG,

4 channel

M8030A

10 channel

70

High-performance NRZ BERT

16 / 32 Gb/s, 1 - 4 channels

Highly integrated

© Keysight Technologies 2017 02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Summary

• Transition from NRZ to PAM-4 is revolutionary

• Many new challenges in both electrical and optical links

• Required Output (Tx) measurements and Input (Rx) stress types are

changing

• New eye measurements for PAM-4 Output tests (e.g. TDECQ,

JRMS, J4, …)

• Linearity added to stressed Input testing

• New tools are needed for characterizing and troubleshooting links

using FEC

• Learn more on the web at: www.keysight.com/find/pam4

© Keysight Technologies 2017 71

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs © Keysight Technologies 2017 72

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Partnering with Keysight will speed your PAM-4 transition

• Keysight helps you master your PAM-4 designs by reducing the complexity of

characterization and compliance testing with tools for:

• Simulation – ADS and SystemVue software

• Output (Tx) Characterization - Oscilloscopes

• Keysight DSAX 63 GHz real-time oscilloscope

o N8827A PAM-4 Measurement Tool With BER

o N8836A PAM-4 Measurement Application for Ethernet and OIF-CEI

www.keysight.com/find/n8827a

www.keysight.com/find/n8836a

• Keysight 86100D DCA-X sampling oscilloscope

o 86100D-9FP PAM-4 Analysis Software

o N1085A PAM-4 Measurement Application for Ethernet and OIF-CEI

www.keysight.com/find/86100D-9FP

www.keysight.com/find/N1085A

• Keysight N1092x DCA-M sampling oscilloscope

www.keysight.com/find/N1092A

• Input (Rx) Characterization - BERTs:

• Keysight M8040A 64 GBaud High Performance BERT

www.keysight.com/find/m8040a

NEW !

NEW !

© Keysight Technologies 2017 73

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Acronymsc2c = Chip-to-Chip

c2m = Chip-to-Module

BER = Bit Error Ratio

BUJ = Bounded Uncorrelated Jitter (used to emulate crosstalk)

DUT = Device Under Test

EW = Eye Width

EH = Eye Height

FEC = Forward Error Correction

FFE = Feed-Forward Equalizer

NRZ = Non-Return to Zero (Refers to 2 level signaling or PAM-2)

PAM-n = Pulse Amplitude Modulation, where n = number of levels

RJ = Random Jitter

RS = Reed-Solomon

SER = Symbol Error Ratio

SIRC = System Impulse Response Correction

SJ = Sinusoidal Jitter

SMF/MM F– Single-mode fiber, Multimode fiber

TDP = Transmitter and Dispersion Penalty

TDEC = Transmitter and Dispersion Eye Closure

TDECQ = Transmitter and dispersion eye closure quaternary (for PAM-4)

© Keysight Technologies 2017 74

02/15/2017

Page

Overcoming test

challenges in

400G/PAM-4 designs

Master your 400 G design

‒ Highly integrated for simplified RX test setup

‒ True PAM-4 error detector for repeatable results

‒ Scalable NRZ/ PAM-4, 32/ 64 GBaud

M8040A 64 GBaud High-performance BERT

75

© Keysight Technologies 2017