Kimberly Smedley and Martin Freeman Criminal Information

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Kimberly Smedley and Martin Freeman Criminal Information

    1/2

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

    ~A0#20IIR00374

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

    . n. l- C 1 Z .. - Oll DCRIMINAL NO. c . .C U - \

    *v .

    KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY and

    MARTIN FREEMAN,

    Defendants.

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    ********

    (Conspiracy to Introduce and Deliver

    for Introduction Into Interstate

    Commerce an Adulterated and

    Misbranded Device with Intent to

    Defraud or Mislead, 18 U.S.c. ~ 371)

    INFORMATION

    The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland charges that:

    At all times relevant:

    1. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY is a resident of Georgia who traveled

    frequently to Baltimore, Maryland; Washington D.C.; Detroit, Michigan; New York City, New

    York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and elsewhere to inject "100 centistoke dimethyl siloxane

    fluid," also known as liquid silicone, into the buttocks of customers for larger and fuller buttocks

    in exchange for money (hereinafter "customers" or "victims"). When used in this fashion, liquid

    silicone is a medical medical device subject to the regulation of Food and Drug Administration

    (FDA).

    2. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY stored liquid silicone in a plastic water

    jug that was not labeled and was not approved by the FDA for the use described in Paragraph I

    above and the liquid silicone, therefore, was adulterated and misbranded.

    3. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY is not a licensed medical practitioner.

    4. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY falsely represented to customers and

    Case 1:12-cr-00110-CCB Document 22 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/2/2019 Kimberly Smedley and Martin Freeman Criminal Information

    2/2

    victims to whom she administered liquid silicone injections for a fee that she used medical grade

    silicone when in fact the silicone was not medical grade silicone.

    5. Defendant MARTIN FREEMAN was a resident of the District of Columbia, and

    a former police officer. FREEMAN was paid by KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY to perform

    security for her as she injected liquid silicone and received a fee for the injections.

    6. In or about and between 2009 and October 11, 201 I, in the District of Maryland

    and elsewhere, the defendants,

    KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY and

    MARTIN FREEMAN,

    did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and with

    others known and unknown to the Grand Jury to commit an offense against the United States,

    that is, to introduce and deliver for introduction into interstate commerce an adulterated and

    misbranded device, specifically liquid silicone, with the intent to defraud or mislead customers,

    in violation of21 U.S.C. S S 33 I (a), 352()(2), and 333(a)(2)

    OVERT ACT

    In furtherance of the conspiracy and to achieve the objectives thereof, at least one of the

    conspirators performed and caused to be performed the following overt act, among others, in the

    District of Maryland: On or about March 30, 201 I , KIMBERLY SMEDLEY administered nine

    (9) injections of silicone into each buttock of victim Jane Doe in a hotel room in Baltimore,

    Maryland.

    18 U.S.C. S 371.

    ( 2 0 1 . J, I 2u~ S fe< ' r 1 b@ROD J. ROSENSTEIN

    United States Attorney

    2

    Case 1:12-cr-00110-CCB Document 22 Filed 03/01/12 Page 2 of 2