Upload
emily-babay
View
233
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Kimberly Smedley and Martin Freeman Criminal Information
1/2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *
~A0#20IIR00374
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
. n. l- C 1 Z .. - Oll DCRIMINAL NO. c . .C U - \
*v .
KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY and
MARTIN FREEMAN,
Defendants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
********
(Conspiracy to Introduce and Deliver
for Introduction Into Interstate
Commerce an Adulterated and
Misbranded Device with Intent to
Defraud or Mislead, 18 U.S.c. ~ 371)
INFORMATION
The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland charges that:
At all times relevant:
1. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY is a resident of Georgia who traveled
frequently to Baltimore, Maryland; Washington D.C.; Detroit, Michigan; New York City, New
York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and elsewhere to inject "100 centistoke dimethyl siloxane
fluid," also known as liquid silicone, into the buttocks of customers for larger and fuller buttocks
in exchange for money (hereinafter "customers" or "victims"). When used in this fashion, liquid
silicone is a medical medical device subject to the regulation of Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).
2. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY stored liquid silicone in a plastic water
jug that was not labeled and was not approved by the FDA for the use described in Paragraph I
above and the liquid silicone, therefore, was adulterated and misbranded.
3. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY is not a licensed medical practitioner.
4. Defendant KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY falsely represented to customers and
Case 1:12-cr-00110-CCB Document 22 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 2
8/2/2019 Kimberly Smedley and Martin Freeman Criminal Information
2/2
victims to whom she administered liquid silicone injections for a fee that she used medical grade
silicone when in fact the silicone was not medical grade silicone.
5. Defendant MARTIN FREEMAN was a resident of the District of Columbia, and
a former police officer. FREEMAN was paid by KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY to perform
security for her as she injected liquid silicone and received a fee for the injections.
6. In or about and between 2009 and October 11, 201 I, in the District of Maryland
and elsewhere, the defendants,
KIMBERLY D. SMEDLEY and
MARTIN FREEMAN,
did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and with
others known and unknown to the Grand Jury to commit an offense against the United States,
that is, to introduce and deliver for introduction into interstate commerce an adulterated and
misbranded device, specifically liquid silicone, with the intent to defraud or mislead customers,
in violation of21 U.S.C. S S 33 I (a), 352()(2), and 333(a)(2)
OVERT ACT
In furtherance of the conspiracy and to achieve the objectives thereof, at least one of the
conspirators performed and caused to be performed the following overt act, among others, in the
District of Maryland: On or about March 30, 201 I , KIMBERLY SMEDLEY administered nine
(9) injections of silicone into each buttock of victim Jane Doe in a hotel room in Baltimore,
Maryland.
18 U.S.C. S 371.
( 2 0 1 . J, I 2u~ S fe< ' r 1 b@ROD J. ROSENSTEIN
United States Attorney
2
Case 1:12-cr-00110-CCB Document 22 Filed 03/01/12 Page 2 of 2