6
Muscular Contribution to Low Back Loading and Stiffness During Standard an d Suspended Push Ups Tyson A.C. Beach, Samuel J. Howarth, Jack P. Callaghan

KINE 4472 - Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 1/6

Muscular Contribution to Low Back Loading and Stiffness

During Standard and Suspended Push Ups

Tyson A.C. Beach, Samuel J. Howarth, Jack P. Callaghan

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 2/6

INTRODUCTION

Why are push-up exercises performed? Increase strength or

endurance of muscles that span the upper extremity joints

Trunk muscle activation: labile vs. stable surfaces

Muscle sti

 

ness and joint sti

 

ness

Why this study?

To examine whether di

 

erences exist in trunk muscle activation levels 

contributions to lumbar IVJ loading androtational sti

 

ness when standard

push-ups were compared to suspended push-ups

 

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 3/6

METHODS

11 trained male volunteers

1 set suspended 1 set standard

push-ups (8-10 repetitions)

IRED’s andEMG recording

electrodes used to assess

muscle activation

Contribution of all spanning

muscles about each axis of each

IVJ were summed and averaged

 

1.83m9.4kg

AGE: 27.4

Standard Push-Up

 

Suspended Push-Up

 

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 4/6

RESULTS

Muscles of the abdominal wall andlatissimus dorsi had increased

mean and peak muscle activation during suspended push-ups

As a direct result of increased muscle activation levels, lumbar

L4/L5 compressive forces and lumbar intervertebral joint 

rotational sti

 

ness were also significantly greater

No significant di

 

erences in linked-segment model outputs or lumbar spine posture

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

RECTUS

ABDOMINIS

EXTERNAL

OBLIQUES

INTERNAL

OBLIQUES

LATISSIMUS

DORSI

     %     o

     f     M     V     I     C

STANDARD SUSPENDED

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Inc.

 

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 5/6

DISCUSSION

Due to the instability of a labile surface, the abdominal muscles illicit

hoop stresses to increase stability in the lower spine

Abdominal activation during push-up can approach or exceed

magnitudes recorded during more conventional abdominal

exercises

Prescribe push-ups as a form of abdominal exercise

Lower back compression with no deviation from neutral

No participant experienced L4/L5 IVJ shear loads in excess of 1 kN

Suspended push-ups may increase the risk of low-back injury for

some individuals

Compressive loads exceeded 3.4 kN limit set by NIOSH

!  Study is based on outputs of a biomechanical model

Sensitive to di

 

erences in anatomical parameters

This model was constructed based on male-based data set

 

8/16/2019 KINE 4472 - Presentation

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kine-4472-presentation 6/6

CONCLUSION

Push-up exercise presents an abdominal muscle challenge

More pronounced when the hands were interfaced with a labile support

surface

!  Compared to standard push-ups, suspended push-ups provide a

superior abdominal muscle challenge based on measured

activation levels and lumbar IVJrotational sti ness

For individuals unable to tolerate large magnitude low-back

compressive loads, benefits gained by incorporating suspended

push-ups may be outweighed by the potential risk of overloading

low-back tissues

Future studies examining upper extremity biomechanics while

performing push-ups on labile support surfaces to provide a more

complete justification for their use in resistance training programs