Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PROPOSAL:o Ask for a yearly Peer‐Review meetingo Structured format for key info to evaluate course
& test validity: ILO‐EXCEL‐file (below)o Other info freely structured : PDCA‐summary,
tests, test‐evaluations, teaching material
GOAL:o Safeguarding EE Assessmentso NVAO13: set up “course files”
QUESTIONS:o How to realize course files?o What should be in?o How to use them?
PREMISES (open doors?):o Teaching is important Review ito Never perfect Plan Do Check Act (PDCA)o “4‐eyes principle” is key Backup‐Teachero Minimize bureaucracy excel & ppt fileso NVAO‐visitations are important PDCAo There are good reasons to obey WHW‐lawo Academic quality desired Peer‐reviewWHO CAN BE “PEERS” in EE‐Teaching?o Same field: Research group memberso Neighboring fields: pre‐ or post‐teaching!o These are stake‐holders (customer/provider)o Accounting via yearly Peer‐review PDCAo Other staff welcome (safeguarding culture)o Focus on “teaching & assessment sequence”
Required information by NVAO and WHW?
ILO‐EXCEL file contents: o Existing Osiris infoo Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)o ILO‐Assessment plan (method, Bloom‐, weight)o Grading plan (method, criteria, cutting score)o ILO‐domain knowledge matrix (IEEE societies)o ILO‐Meijers criteria categories matrixo Meijers criteria coverage levelNote: = key info on test validity and transparency
Post‐Teacher
Pre‐TeacherTeacher & Back‐up Teacher