KU-RING-GAI PLANNING PANEL TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 20 …€¦ · The final report- Review of Potential Heritage Items in the Ku-ring-gai LGA was presented to Council on 12 June

KU-RING-GAI PLANNING PANEL TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2010 AT 5.00PM

LEVEL 3, COUNCIL CHAMBERS

A G E N D A ** ** ** ** ** **

NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website – www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

APOLOGIES DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING ADDRESSES TO THE PANEL DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO THE PANEL CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Minutes of Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel File: S06347 Meeting held 25 August 2010 Minutes numbered PP16 to PP17

MINUTES FROM THE CHAIRPERSON

101020-KPP-Crs-00945.doc\2

PETITIONS GENERAL BUSINESS

Proposal to Amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 to Remove the Listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble

1

. File: S08325

GB.1

To report to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel on the outcomes of the community consultation for the Planning Proposal to rectify the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010. Recommendation: That the Planning Panel forward the Planning Proposal to the Minister in the form that it was exhibited and request that the amendment to the Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 be made.

EXTRA REPORTS CIRCULATED AT MEETING BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE - MATTERS OF GREAT URGENCY

** ** ** ** ** ** **

Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel - 20 October 2010 1 / 1 Item 1 S08325 12 October 2010

N:\101020-KPP-SR-00944-PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE KUR.doc/duval /1

PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE KU-RING-GAI LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN (TOWN CENTRES) 2010

TO REMOVE THE LISTING OF 20 PARK CRESCENT, PYMBLE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PURPOSE OF REPORT: To report to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel on the outcomes of the community consultation for the Planning Proposal to rectify the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

BACKGROUND: The Town Centres LEP 2010 incorrectly identifies 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a heritage item. On 9 June 2009 the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel resolved to initiate a Planning Proposal to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble.

COMMENTS: There were six (6) submissions received during the exhibition period which were all in support of the Planning Proposal to de-list 20 Park Crescent, Pymble. Following consideration of these submissions it is proposed to proceed with the Planning Proposal in the form it was exhibited.

RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Panel forward the Planning Proposal to the Minister in the form that it was exhibited and request that the amendment to the Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 be made.



PURPOSE OF REPORT To report to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel on the outcomes of the community consultation for the Planning Proposal to rectify the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

BACKGROUND

On 9 June 2009, the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel resolved to initiate a planning proposal to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble (SP 78827; Lot 1, DP 124625) from the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

A heritage review was undertaken by Perumal Murphy Alessi Pty Ltd for Council in 2005/2006. The final report - Review of Potential Heritage Items in the Ku-ring-gai LGA was presented to Council on 12 June 2007. In that report, the recommendation for 20 Park Crescent was that No. 20 Park Crescent should not be included as a heritage item. This error was not identified until after the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel adopted the final draft Local Environmental Plan (LEP) on 27 May 2009. This error was also not identified during the public exhibition and submission process of the draft Town Centres LEP.

The NSW Department of Planning were made aware of this matter and recommended that the most appropriate method for addressing the problem was to submit a planning proposal to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

COMMENTS

A planning proposal to remove 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a Heritage Item from Schedule 5 of the Town Centres LEP 2010 was subsequently prepared in accordance with the Planning Panel’s resolution of 9 June 2010, and submitted to the Department of Planning on 14 July 2010 (Attachment 1).

A Gateway Determination for the planning proposal was received on 19 August 2010 (Attachment 2). The Gateway Determination provided a 3 month finalisation period.

The planning proposal was placed on public exhibition in accordance with the Gateway determination for a 14 day period, from 3 September 2010 to 17 September 2010.

During the exhibition period there were six (6) submissions received from the public (Attachment 3). All submissions were in support of the planning proposal stating that the correction of the erroneous listing of 20 Park Crescent Pymble as a heritage listing as a fitting conclusion to this issue and thanked Council in advance.

There were no objections to the removal of the heritage listing of the property.

CONSULTATION The planning proposal was placed on public exhibition in accordance with the Gateway Determination for a 14 day period from 3 September 2010 to 17 September 2010. The community were notified of the exhibition via a notice in the North Shore Times on 3 September 2010. All adjoining property owners were notified by mail. Details of the planning proposal and supporting material were made available on Council’s website, at the Council



Chambers and all Council Libraries. All persons who made a submission have been notified of this report going to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

The cost of preparing and processing this project is covered by the Strategy & Environment Department Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel Budget.

CONSULTATION WITH OTHER COUNCIL DEPARTMENTS

Consultation with other departments has been conducted where appropriate in the preparation of this report.

SUMMARY

The planning proposal to remove 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a Heritage Item from the Schedule 5 of the Town Centres LEP 2010 was placed on public exhibition in accordance with the Gateway Determination for a 14 day period from 3 September 2010 to 17 September 2010. There were six (6) submissions received during the exhibition period.

All submissions stated that they supported the planning proposal to remove 20 Park Crescent from the Heritage Schedule and supporting Maps from the Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP). Following consideration of these submissions the issues it is not proposed to make any amendments to the exhibited Planning Proposal.

RECOMMENDATION

A. That the Planning Panel forward the Planning Proposal to Director-General in the form that it was exhibited and requested that a Local Environmental Plan be made to amend the Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP) to remove 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a Heritage Item from Schedule 5 of the Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP).

B. That a copy of the report and the public submissions on the planning proposal be

forwarded to the NSW Department of Planning.

C. That all persons who made a submission be notified of the Planning Panel’s decision.

Craige Wyse Team Leader Urban Planning

Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

Deborah Silva Acting Director Strategy & Environment

Attachments: 1. Planning Proposal - 2010/132443

1a. Previous Report to Planning Panel, 9/6/2010 - 2010/107912 1b. Resolution of Planning Panel, 9/6/2010 - 2010/107909 2. Gateway Determination letter - 2010/160814 2a. Listing for Submissions - 2010/179723-Page 1 3. Six (6) public submission letters - 2010/179723 - P2, 2010/179728, 2010/179743, 2010/179750, 2010/179755 & 2010/179781

2010/132443

KU-RING-GAI PLANNING PANEL

Planning Proposal

Amendment to remove 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a Heritage Item from the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010

2010/132443

Planning Proposal: 20 Park Crescent, Pymble

Background: The Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 was gazetted by the Minister for Planning on 25 May 2010. The adopted Plan incorrectly identifies 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a heritage item. This planning proposal seeks to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble from Schedule 5 and Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

Planning proposal 1. A statement of the objectives or intended outcomes of the proposal local

environmental plan. The planning proposal seeks to remove 20 Park Crescent, Pymble (SP78827; Lot 1, DP 1124625) from the recently made Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 which incorrectly identified the site in the heritage schedule as a heritage item of local significance.

2. An explanation of the provisions that are to be included in the proposed

local environmental plan. It is proposed to amend Schedule 5 and the Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010, to delete reference to 20 Park Crescent, Pymble.

3. Justification for those objectives, outcomes, and provisions and the

process for their implementation

A. Need for the planning proposal A1. Is the planning proposal a result of any strategic study or report?

The property 20 Park Crescent, Pymble was included in the potential heritage item review undertaken by Perumal Murphy Alessi Pty Ltd for Council in 2005/2006. The final report- Review of Potential Heritage Items in the Ku-ring-gai LGA was presented to Council on 12 June 2007. In this report, the recommendation for 20 Park Crescent was as follows:-

20 Park Crescent Pymble It is recommended that no.20 Park Crescent SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED as a heritage item under the control of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance for the following reasons:

The building is an Inter-War Spanish Mission dwelling which has been

modified with substantial additions. The building has no historic or social significance which would demand its inclusion as a listed item. The battle axe site also means that the building and grounds are not visible from the street and therefore results in the building making no contribution to the character of the immediate area.

The inclusion of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble, in the Heritage Schedule was not identified as an error until after the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel adopted the final draft LEP on 27 May 2009. This error was not identified during the public exhibition and submission process. In addition, the property was developed as a detached dual occupancy in 2007 further detracting from any potential heritage significance. A2. Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way?

The NSW Department of Planning and the Minister for Planning were advised of this error, as the final gazetted Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 includes the

2010/132443

property in Schedule 5 and identified on the Heritage Map. The NSW Department of Planning have recommended that the most appropriate method for addressing the problem is to submit a planning proposal to amend Schedule 5 and the Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010. Thus it is considered that a planning proposal is the best means of achieving the objectives intended.

A3. Is there a net community benefit?

This proposal does not involve a rezoning and therefore the “Net Community Benefit Test” is not applicable. However, it is considered that by removing an incorrectly listed heritage item, the planning proposal will provide a clearer implementation of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

B. Relationship to strategic planning framework B1. Is the planing proposal consistent with the objectives and actions contained within the applicable regional or sub regional strategy? The Planing Proposal is considered to be consistent with the objectives and actions of the Metropolitan Strategy and the draft North Subregional Strategy. The draft North Subregional Strategy states heritage items included in heritage schedules of LEPs should have statements of significance that describe the heritage significance of each item. Due to the modifications to the building and the largely hidden nature of the house and grounds have resulted in very little aesthetic contribution to the character of the immediate area, and as such, the property is not recommended for listing as a heritage item in the heritage schedule. B2. Is the planning proposal consistent with the local Council’s community strategic plan or other local strategic plan? As this Planing Proposal is to remove an item incorrectly added to the Heritage Schedule of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010, it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the Ku-ring-gai Council Community Strategic Plan 2030. B3. Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable state environmental planning policies? As this proposal seeks to amend the Schedule 5 and the Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 it is considered to be consistent with all applicable state environmental planning policies. Refer to Attachment B. B4.is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s.117 directions) The planning proposal is considered to be consistent with all applicable s.117 directions. The relevant directions that apply are:

Directions under S117 Contents Consistent 2.3 Heritage Conservation The objective of this direction

is to conserve items, areas, objects and places of environmental Heritage significance and indigenous heritage significance.

Yes- the property is not considered to be of environmental heritage significance.

3.1 Residential Zones The objectives of this direction are: a) to encourage a variety

and choice of housing types to provide for existing and future housing needs,

b) to make efficient use of existing infrastructure

Yes- the removal of the heritage listing for the property provides the opportunity for Housing variety and choice on the site consistent with the zone.

2010/132443

and services and ensure that new housing has appropriate access to infrastructure and services, and

c) to minimise the impact of residential development on the environment and resource lands.

See Appendix B for full table.

C. Environmental social and economic impact C1. Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats, will be adversely affected as a result of the proposal? There is no likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities and their habitats will be adversely affected as a result of this proposal. C2. Are there any other likely environmental effects as a result of the planning proposal and how are they proposed to be managed? The proposal to delete the site from the Heritage Schedule and Map does not have any likely environmental effects on the area. C3. Has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects? The planning proposal will not result in any additional social and economic effects. D. State and Commonwealth Interest D1. Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal? As this planning proposal is seeking to remove a site that was incorrectly identified as a heritage item, the issue of public infrastructure is not considered relevant in this case D2. What are the views of State and Commonwealth Public Authorities consulted in accordance with the gateway determination, and have they resulted in ant variations to the planning proposal? Consultations with the NSW Department of Planning have been carried out and have supported the view that the planning proposal be submitted to the Gateway Process to have this issue rectified. Consultations with Commonwealth Public Authorities are not considered relevant at this time. 4. Details of the community consultation that is to be undertaken on the

planning proposal It is proposed that the planning proposal will be exhibited in accordance with the requirements of section 57 of the EP&A Act and/or any other requirements as determined by the Gateway process under section 56 of the EP&A Act. This is considered a “low impact planning proposal” requiring an exhibition period of 14 days. Public notification of the exhibition will include a notice in the local newspaper and notice of Councils website. During the exhibition period, the planning proposal, gateway determination and other relevant documentation will be available of Councils website and hard copies will be available at Councils Customer Service Centre and at Council’s libraries.

2010/132443

ATTACHMENT A

PLANNING PANEL REPORT AND RESOLUTION

Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel – 9 June 2010 3 / 1 Item 3 S06347 & S06523 3 June 2010

N:\100609-KPP-SR-00786-PLANNING PROPOSAL AMENDM.doc/duval / 1

PLANNING PROPOSAL - AMENDMENT TO KU-RING-GAI LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN

(TOWN CENTRES) 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PURPOSE OF REPORT: For the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel to consider a planning proposal to rectify an error in relation to the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

BACKGROUND: The Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 was gazetted by the Minister for Planning on 25 May 2010. The adopted Plan incorrectly identifies 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a heritage item.

COMMENTS: The Department of Planning were made aware of this error and have recommended that a planning proposal be submitted to the NSW Department of Planning Gateway Process to have the issue rectified.

RECOMMENDATION: That the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel, in accordance with Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) (as amended), initiate a planning proposal to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble under the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.



PURPOSE OF REPORT For the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel to consider a planning proposal to rectify an error in relation to the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

BACKGROUND The property 20 Park Crescent, Pymble (SP 78827; Lot 1, DP 1124625) was included in the potential heritage item review undertaken by Perumal Murphy Alessi Pty Ltd for Council in 2005/2006. The final report - Review of Potential Heritage Items in the Ku-ring-gai LGA was presented to Council on 12 June 2007. In that report, the recommendation for 20 Park Crescent was as follows:- 20 Park Crescent, Pymble It is recommended that No. 20 Park Crescent SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED as a heritage item under the control of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance for the following reasons: � the building is an Inter-War Spanish Mission dwelling which has been modified with

substantial additions. The building has no historic or social significance which would demand its inclusion as a listed item. The battle axe site also means that the building and grounds are not visible from the street and therefore results in the building making no contribution to the character of the immediate area.

COMMENTS This error was not identified until after the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel adopted the final draft Local Environmental Plan (LEP) on 27 May 2009. This error was not identified during the public exhibition and submission process. The Department of Planning and the Minister for Planning were advised of this error, but the final gazetted Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 still includes the property in schedule 5 of the Plan as: Pymble House 20 Park Crescent SP 78827, Lot 1 DP 1124625 Local I70 and the property is also included on the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 heritage map. The NSW Department of Planning were made aware of this matter and they have recommended that the most appropriate method for addressing the problem is to submit a planning proposal to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.



CONSULTATION Council have been consulting the owners of the property at 20 Park Crescent, Pymble regarding this matter and the owners have also made representations to the Minister for Planning and the NSW Department of Planning on the incorrect heritage listing. The draft planning proposal will be exhibited in accordance with the planning gateway determination.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS The cost of preparing and processing this project is covered by the Strategy Department - Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel budget.

CONSULTATION WITH OTHER COUNCIL DEPARTMENTS Consultation with other Departments where appropriate has been conducted in the preparation of this report.

SUMMARY The Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 was gazetted by the Minister on 25 May 2010. The adopted Plan incorrectly identifies 20 Park Crescent, Pymble as a heritage item in Schedule 5 of the LEP. The Department of Planning were made aware of this error and have recommended that a planning proposal be submitted to the NSW Department of Planning to have the issue rectified.

RECOMMENDATION

A. That the Ku-ring-gai Planing Panel in accordance with Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) initiate a draft Local Environmental Plan to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in Schedule 5 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

B. That the General Manager be granted delegation to prepare and submit the planning

proposal to the Minister for Planning to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble (SP 78827; Lot 1, DP 1124625) in Schedule 5 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 and that the planning proposal include the following:

i. a statement of the objectives or intended outcomes of the proposed instrument;

ii. an explanation of the provisions that are to be included in the proposed

instrument;



iii. the justification for those objectives, outcomes and provisions and the process

for their implementation (including whether the proposed instrument will comply with relevant directions under Section 117); and

iv. details of the community consultation that is to be undertaken before consideration is given to the making of the proposed instrument.

C. That the planning proposal be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the

requirements of any gateway determination issued by the NSW Department of Planning.

D. That a report be brought back to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel at the conclusion of

the exhibition period. Antony Fabbro Acting Director Strategy & Environment

/1

RESOLUTION OF KU-RING-GAI PLANNING PANEL

09 JUNE 2010

Planning Proposal - Amendment to Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 . Files: S06347 & S06523

PP11

For the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel to consider a planning proposal to rectify an error in relation to the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010. Resolved: (Moved: S McDonald/V Berkhout) A. That the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel in accordance with Section 55 of the

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) initiate a draft Local Environmental Plan to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble in Schedule 5 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010.

B. That the General Manager be granted delegation to prepare and submit the

planning proposal to the Minister for Planning to remove the incorrect heritage listing of 20 Park Crescent, Pymble (SP 78827; Lot 1, DP 1124625) in Schedule 5 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 and that the planning proposal include the following:

i. A statement of the objectives or intended outcomes of the proposed instrument;

ii. An explanation of the provisions that are to be included in the proposed instrument;

iii. The justification for those objectives, outcomes and provisions and the process for their implementation (including whether the proposed instrument will comply with relevant directions under Section 117); and

iv. Details of the community consultation that is to be undertaken before consideration is given to the making of the proposed instrument.

C. That the planning proposal be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of any gateway determination issued by the NSW Department of Planning.

D. That a report be brought back to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel at the conclusion of the exhibition period.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

1

ATTACHMENT B

ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING PROPOSAL CONSISTENCY WITH

SECTION 117 DIRECTION AND STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES

2

PART A: DIRECTIONS UNDER S117(2) Not relevant

Consistent

PART 1 – GENERAL DIRECTIONS 1. Employment and Resources

1.1 Business and Industrial Zones 1.2 Rural Zones 1.3 Mining, Petroleum production and Extractive Industries 1.4 Oyster Aquaculture 1.5 Rural Lands

2. Environment and Heritage 2.1 Environment Protection Zones 2.2 Coastal Protection 2.3 Heritage Conservation 2.4 Recreation Vehicle Areas

3. Housing, Infrastructure and Urban Development 3.1 Residential Zones 3.2 Caravan Parks and Manufactured Home Estates 3.3 Home Occupations 3.4 Integrating Land Use and Transport 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes

4. Hazard and Risk 4.1 Acid Sulfate Soils 4.2 Mine Subsidence and Unstable Land 4.3 Flood Prone Land 4.4 Planning for Bushfire Protection

5. Regional Planning 5.1 Implementation of Regional Strategies 5.2 Sydney Drinking Water Catchments 5.3 Farmland of State and Regional Significance on the

NSW Far North Coast

5.4 Commercial and Retail Development along the Pacific Highway, North Coast

5.5 Development in the vicinity of Ellalong, Paxton and Millfield (Cessnock LGA)

5.6 Sydney to Canberra Corridor (Revoked 10 July 2008. See amended Direction 5.1)

5.7 Central Coast (Revoked 10 July 2008. See amended Direction 5.1)

5.8 Second Sydney Airport: Badgerys Creek 6. Local Plan Making

6.1 Approval and Referral Requirements 6.2 Reserving Land for Public Purposes 6.3 Site Specific Provisions

7. Metropolitan Planning 7.1 Implementation of the Metropolitan Strategy

3

PART B: STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES

Not relevant

Consistent

SEPP1 Development Standards SEPP4 Development Without Consent SEPP6 Number of Storeys in a Building SEPP19 Bushland in Urban Areas SEPP21 Caravan Parks SEPP22 Shops and Commercial Premises SEPP30 Intensive Agriculture SEPP32 Urban Consolidation (Redevelopment of Urban

Land)

SEPP33 Hazardous and Offensive Development SEPP44 Koala Habitat Protection SEPP53 Metropolitan Residential Development SEPP55 Remediation of Land SEPP60 Exempt and Complying Development SEPP62 Sustainable Aquaculture SEPP64 Advertising and Signage SEPP65 Design Quality of Residential Flat Development

SEPP70 Affordable Housing (Revised Schemes) SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability)

– 2004

SEPP Building Sustainability Index : Basix 2004

SEPP Major Development SEPP Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive

Industries

SEPP Temporary Structures 2007 SEPP Infrastructure 2007 SEPP Affordable Rental Housing 2009 SEPP Exempt and Complying Development Codes

2008

PART C: REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS Not relevant Consistent

SYDNEY REP20 Hawkesbury-Nepean River SYDNEY REP (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

The Ku-ring-gai Planning Panel is seeking public comment on a planning proposal to rectify an error by removing 20 Park Crescent, Pymble from the Heritage Schedule and Map under the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010. Viewing the document The Planning Proposal will be on exhibition from Friday September 3 to Friday September 17, 2010 and can be downloaded from

Hard copies are also available Council Chambers or any branch of Ku-ring-gai Library.

Providing feedback Comments on the document must be provided as a written submission and should quote reference S08325". Email your feedback to kmc(kmc.nsw.ciov.au or post to The General Manager, Ku-ring-gai Council, Locked Bag 1056, Pymble NSW 2073. Submission close 5pm Friday September 17, 2010. Please note that details of submissions are public documents and will not remain confidential.

Enquiries: Council's Customer Service Centre on 9424 0000.

Documents

KU-RING-GAI PLANNING PANEL TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 20 …€¦ · The final report- Review of Potential Heritage Items in the Ku-ring-gai LGA was presented to Council on 12 June