Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    1/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    2/111

    Disease Progress

    Disease on plants usually starts

    out at a low level, a small number

    of plants affected and a smallamount of plant tissue affected,

    and it becomes of concern to us

    only when its incidence andseverity increases with time.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    3/111

    Disease Progress

    When we look at some examples ofplant disease epidemics from thepublished literature, we not only

    notice that the incidence or severitystarts near zero and then increasesdramatically, but we alsocan discernsome distinct patterns of

    development with time.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    4/111

    Disease Progress

    For example, in Phytophthora blight of

    pepper seedlings (Phytophthora

    capsici) and Fusarium kernel rot(Fusarium moniliforme) of maize,

    disease progress is roughly linear

    (allowing for some minor deviationsthat we can consider random error)

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    5/111

    Phytophthora blight of pepper seedlings

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    6/111

    Fusarium kernel rot of maize

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    7/111

    Disease Progress

    On the other hand, in bean rust (Uromyces

    phaseoli) and grey leaf spot of corn

    (Cercospora zeae-maydis), there is a

    definite upward curve; that is, diseaseincreases at an increasing rate, a curve we

    could call exponential.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    8/111

    Bean rust

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    9/111

    Grey leafspot of

    maize

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    10/111

    Disease Progress

    Obviously plant disease cannot continue toincrease forever, and as the level of diseaseapproaches 100%, the disease progress

    curve gradually flattens out. For example, inepidemicssuch as the infection of beans bySclerotium rolfsiior the infection of tobaccoby Phytophthora parasiticavar. nicotianae,

    disease progress starts out looking linearbut slows down as it approaches amaximum.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    11/111

    Sclerot ium rol fs i ion beans

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    12/111

    Black shank on tobacco

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    13/111

    Disease Progress

    Likewise, the disease progress curves of

    Puccinia graminissubsp. graminicolaon

    ryegrass and Pyrenophora teresf. sp. teres

    on barley appear exponential at first, but astime goes on and the incidence and severity

    of disease approach 100%, the rate of

    disease progress gradually slows to zero,giving both curves a somewhat sigmoid

    shape ("S" shape).

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    14/111

    Black stem rust on ryegrass

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    15/111

    Net blotch on barley

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    16/111

    To be sure, not all examples of

    disease progress can be as neatly

    categorized as these, but in general

    plant disease epidemics tend to be

    either roughly linear or exponential in

    the early stages, and they tend to

    level off as they approach some limit.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    17/111

    The impact of plant disease and the

    losses that it causes are a function of

    disease progress. To reduce this

    impact, we need not eliminate the

    disease, we merely need to keep

    disease development below anacceptable level.That means that the

    progress of disease and the factors that

    influence disease progress must beunderstood in quantitative terms.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    18/111

    1.what kinds of diseases lead to linear disease

    progressand what factors affect the slope of the line

    (the rate of disease progress).

    2. what kinds of diseases tend to produce

    exponential disease progresscurves and how we

    can reduce both the starting level of disease andthe

    rate of epidemic development.

    3. why epidemics sometimes level off and what

    imposes limits to their development.

    We have to know :

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    19/111

    The Cyclical Nature of Plant

    Disease

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    20/111

    The inoculum,

    which might

    consist of

    gains entry into and establishment

    within the host tissues through the

    process of infection.

    http://images.google.co.id/imgres?imgurl=http://www.apsnet.org/Education/IllustratedGlossary/PhotosS-V/stoma.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.apsnet.org/Education/IllustratedGlossary/PhotosS-V/stoma.htm&h=275&w=400&sz=31&hl=id&start=16&tbnid=gxzjSmri90v-_M:&tbnh=85&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dstomatal%2Bopening%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Did%26lr%3D
  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    21/111

    The pathogen develops within the

    host and eventually begins to

    produce new inoculum, which, in

    turn, can be dispersed to new

    susceptible sites to initiate new

    infections.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    22/111

    Pathogens that produce only one

    cycle of development (one infection

    cycle) per crop cycle are called

    monocyclic, while pathogens thatproduce more than one infection

    cycle per crop cycle are called

    polycyclic.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    23/111

    Generally in temperate climatesthere isonly one crop cycle per year, so the terms

    "monocyclic" and "polycyclic" are basedon the number of cycles per year. Intropical or subtropical climates, however,there can be more than one crop cycle

    per year, and it is important to rememberthat "monocyclic" and "polycyclic" arebased on a single crop cycle. These sameterms are used to describe the epidemics

    as well as the pathogens, so we oftenspeak of a "monocyclic epidemic"or a"polycyclic epidemic".

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    24/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    25/111

    Change : often increase -- a dynamic process

    Disease : dealing with diseases, not just the

    pathogen (or plant/crop)

    Host : Organism infected (or potentially

    infected) by another organism

    Population : a population phenomenon

    Time and space : two physical dimensions

    of interest.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    26/111

    Epidemiology:

    Study of epidemics.

    Science of disease in populations. Ecology of disease.

    Study of the spread of diseases, in space andtime,

    with the objective to trace factors that areresponsible for, or contribute to, epidemic

    occurrence.

    The science of populations of pathogens inpopulations of host plants, and the diseases

    resulting therefrom under the influence of

    the environment and human interferences.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    27/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    28/111

    All plant diseases result from a three-way

    interaction between the host, the pathogen

    andthe environment.

    An epidemic develops if all three of these

    factors are favourable to diseasedevelopment.

    Therefore, disease can be controlled by

    manipulating one or more of these factorsso

    that conditions are unsuitable for replication,

    survival or infection by the pathogen.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    29/111

    Since the beginning of agriculture, generations

    of farmers have been evolving practices for

    combating the various plagues suffered by our

    crops. Following our discovery of the causes ofplant diseases in the early nineteenth century,

    our growing understanding of the interactions of

    pathogen and host has enabled us to develop a

    wide array of measures for the control of specific

    plant diseases.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    30/111

    From this accumulated knowledge

    base, we can distill some general

    principles of plant disease controlthat can help us address the

    management of new problems onwhatever crop in any environment.

    O h t f i i l fi t

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    31/111

    One such set of principles, first

    articulated by H. H. Whetzel in 1929

    and modified somewhat by variousauthors over the years, has been

    widely adopted and taught to

    generations of plant pathologystudents around the world. These

    "traditional principles", as they have

    come to be known, were outlined by acommittee of the US National

    Academy of Sciences, 1968.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    32/111

    Avoidanceprevent disease by selecting a time of the year or

    a site where there is no inoculum or where the environment isnot favorable for infection.

    Exclusionprevent the introduction of inoculum.

    Eradicationeliminate, destroy, or inactivate the inoculum.

    Protectionprevent infection by means of a toxicant or some

    other barrier to infection.

    Resistanceutilize cultivars that are resistant to or tolerant of

    infection.

    Therapy

    cure plants that are already infected.

    Traditional Principles of Plant Disease Control

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    33/111

    While these principles are as valid today asthey were in 1929, in the context of modern

    concepts of plant disease management, theyhave some critical shortcomings.

    First of all,these principles are stated inabsolute terms (e.g., "exclude", "prevent", and

    "eliminate") that imply a goal of zero disease.Plant disease "control" in this sense is notpractical, and in most cases is not evenpossible. Indeed, we need not eliminate a

    disease; we merely need to reduce its progressand keep disease development below anacceptable level. Instead of plant diseasecontrol, we need to think in terms of plant

    disease management.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    34/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    35/111

    Furthermore, considering that different

    diseases differ in their dynamics, they donot indicate the relative effectiveness of

    the various tactics for the controlof a

    particular disease. They also fail to show

    how the different disease control

    measures interact in their effects on

    disease dynamics. We need some means

    of assessing quantitatively the effects ofvarious control measures, singly and in

    combination, on the progress of disease.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    36/111

    Finally, the traditional principles of

    plant disease control tend to

    emphasize tactics without fitting

    them into an adequate overall

    strategy.

    Does this mean that we should

    abandon the traditional principles? Of

    course not! We merely have to fit theminto an appropriate overall strategy

    based on epidemiological principles.

    The Epidemiological Basis of Disease

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    37/111

    The Epidemiological Basis of Disease

    ManagementPlant disease epidemics can be classified into two basic types,

    monocyclic and polycyclic, depending on the number ofinfection cycles per crop cycle. (See: The Cyclical Nature of

    Plant Disease.)

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    38/111

    The early stages of a monocyclic epidemic can be

    described quite well by a linear model, while the early

    stages of a polycyclic epidemic can be described with an

    exponential model. Since we are concerned with keeping

    disease levels well below 100%, there is no need to

    adjust the models for approaching the upper limit, and

    we can use the simple linear and exponential models toplan strategies:

    Examining these models we can see that in both there are

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    39/111

    1. Reduce the initial inoculum (Qin the

    monocyclic model and xoin the polycyclic

    model). (Actually xois the initial incidence of

    disease, which is proportional to the initialinoculum.)

    2. Reduce the rate of infection (Rin the

    monocyclic model and rin the polycyclicmodel)

    3. Reduce the duration of the epidemic (the time,

    t, at the end of the epidemic)

    Examining these models, we can see that in both there are

    three ways in which we can reduce xat any point in the

    epidemic:

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    40/111

    These can be used as three major

    strategiesfor managing plant diseaseepidemics, and we can organize our

    plant disease control tacticsunder one

    or more of these overall strategies.

    Furthermore, by means of the model we

    can assess the quantitative impact of

    each strategy, not only by itself, but in

    its interaction with others.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    41/111

    It is clear from the above model of a monocyclic

    epidemic that Q, R, and t have equal weight intheir effect on x. A reduction in the initial

    inoculum or the rate of infection will result in a

    reduction in the level of disease by the sameproportion at any time, t, throughout the epidemic.

    If tcan be reduced (for example, by shortening the

    season), disease will be reduced proportionately.

    The monocyclic

    model

    The polycyclic

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    42/111

    The polycyclic

    model If ris very high, the apparent

    effect of reducing xois to delaythe epidemic.

    If ris very high, xomust be reduced to very

    low levels to have a significant effect on theepidemic.

    Reducing rhas a relatively greater effect onthe epidemic than reducing x

    o.

    Reducing xomakes good strategic sense onlyif ris low or if ris also being reduced.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    43/111

    The Traditional Principles Revisited

    To make the conceptual leap from disease

    control to disease management, the

    traditional principles can be modified by

    fitting them as tactics within each of the

    three major disease management strategies

    and by slightly changing the wording toreflect the quantitative impact of the action

    rather than an absolute effect:

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    44/111

    PRINSIP PENGELOLAAN PENYAKIT

    TUMBUHAN

    Pada prinsipnya, untuk mengelola penyakit tumbuhanada strategidan ada taktikyang dapat digunakan.

    Taktik dipakai untuk mencapai tujuan berdasar strategiyang dicanangkan.

    Secara umum, ada tiga strategi yang dapat dilakukanuntuk pengendalian penyakit tumbuhan yaitu :

    (1) strategi untuk mengurangi inokulum awal,

    (2) strategi untuk mengurangi laju infeksi, dan

    (3) strategi untuk mengurangi lamanya epidemi.

    Sedangkan taktik pada prinsipnya ada enam, yaituavoidan, ekslusi, eradikasi, proteksi, resistensi, danterapi.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    45/111

    Tactics for the Reduction of Initial Inoculum

    Avoidancereduce the level of disease by selecting aseason or a site where the amount of inoculum is loworwhere the environment is unfavorable for infection

    Exclusionreduce the amount of initial inoculum introducedfrom outside sources

    Eradicationreduce the production of initial inoculum bydestroying or inactivating the sources of initial inoculum(sanitation, removal of reservoirs of inoculum, removal ofalternate hosts, etc.)

    Protectionreduce the level of initial infection by means ofa toxicant or other barrier to infection

    Resistanceuse cultivars that are resistant to infection,particularly the initial infection

    Therapyuse thermotherapy, chemotherapy and/ormeristem culture to produce certified seed or vegetativeplanting stock

    Tactics for the Reduction of the Infection

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    46/111

    Tactics for the Reduction of the Infection

    Rate

    Avoidancereduce the rate of production of inoculum, therate of infection, or the rate of development of the pathogenby selecting a season or a site where the environment isnot favorable

    Exclusionreduce the introduction of inoculum fromexternal sources during the course of the epidemic

    Eradicationreduce the rate of inoculum production duringthe course of the epidemic by destroying or inactivating thesources of inoculum (roguing)

    Protectionreduce the rate of infection by means of atoxicant or some other barrier to infection

    Resistanceplant cultivars that can reduce the rate ofinoculum production, the rate of infection, or the rate ofpathogen development

    Therapycure the plants that are already infected orreduce their production of inoculum

    T ti f th R d ti f th

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    47/111

    Tactics for the Reduction of the

    Duration of the Epidemic

    Avoidanceplant early maturing cultivars

    or plant at a time that favors rapid

    maturation of the crop

    Exclusiondelay the introduction of

    inoculum from external sources by means

    of plant quarantine

    PENGENDALIAN PENYAKIT TUMBUHAN

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    48/111

    MENGURANGI LAJU INFEKSI

    MENGURANGI LAMANYA EPIDEMI

    MENGURANGI INOKULUM AWAL

    EKSLUSI

    AVOIDAN

    STRATEGI

    Waktu tanam, lahan, lingkungan yg tak cocok untukpatogen

    Mengurangi jumlah inokulum awal yang berasal dariluar lahan

    Sanitasi, buang sumber inokulum, musnahkan inangantara, dsb.

    Aplikasi fungisida, atau buat penghalang infeksi pdtanaman

    Kultivar yang tahan terhadap infeksi inokulum awal

    Terapi panas, kimia, benih / bag. tan. vegetativ bebaspenyakit

    EKSLUSI

    TERAPI

    ERADIKASI

    RESISTEN

    PROTEKSI

    TAKTIK

    AVOIDAN

    Laju dikurangi dg waktu tanam, lahan, lingkungan ygtak cocok

    Kurangi masuknya inokulum selama terjadinyaepidemi

    Tebang, pangkas, musnahkan inokulum saatterjadinya epidemi

    Kurangi laju infeksi dengan fungisida ataupenghalang lain

    Kultivar yang mengurangi laju in-feksi/perkemb.patogen/inokulum

    Sembuhkan tanaman yang telah terinfeksi

    EKSLUSI

    TERAPI

    ERADIKASI

    RESISTEN

    PROTEKSI

    AVOIDAN

    Tanaman cepat dewasa agar terhindar dari infeksi

    Hambat introduksi inokulum dari luar dengankarantina

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    49/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    50/111

    Cara pendekatan pendekatan terhadap tanaman

    pendekatan yang ditujukan terhadappenyebab penyakit tertentu

    Terintegrasi ke dalamMETODA PENGENDALIAN

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    51/111

    Penghindaran patogen

    Pemilihan daerah pertanian.

    Pemilihan waktu tanam.

    Penggunaan benih yang bebas penyakit.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    52/111

    Eksklusi patogen

    Perawatan bahan tanaman.

    Karantina tumbuhan.

    Pembasmian serangga vektor.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    53/111

    Erad ikasi patogen

    Pergiliran tanam.

    Membuang atau menghancurkan tanaman

    atau bagian tanaman yang terserang.

    Perlakuan tanah.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    54/111

    Perl indungan tanaman

    Pengendalian serangga pembawa

    patogen.

    Mengubah keadaan lingkungan.

    Mengubah keadaan zat hara.

    M b k t

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    55/111

    Mengembangkan tanaman yang

    resisten

    Resistensi fisiologis

    Resistensi mekanis

    Resistensi fungsional

    Resistensi oleh Khemoterapi

    a. Resistensi fisiologis yang biasanya

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    56/111

    g y g y

    didasarkan kepada adanya zat di dalam

    protoplasma yang menghambat infeksi

    patogen dan perkembangannya lebihlanjut di dalam tanaman.

    b. Resistensi mekanis yang berhubungan

    dengan struktur atau morfologi dari bagian-bagian tanaman tertentu meliputi sifat

    karakteristik yang dipunyai oleh tanaman

    yang menyulitkan patogen mengadakan

    kontak secara langsung dengan bagian

    yang akan diinfeksinya seperti adanya

    lapisan kutikula atau lapisan gabus yang

    tebal.

    R i i f i l

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    57/111

    c. Resistensi fungsionalyang

    berhubungan dengan waktu penutupan

    stomata.d. Resistensi oleh Khemoterapidimana

    terdapat kemungkinan mengubah

    ketahanan terhadap patogen yangterdapat dalam protoplasma dengan

    pemberian senyawa kimiapada

    tanaman. Pada umumnya cara tersebutmemperlambat atau mengurangi

    timbulnya penyakit.

    T i d ib ik k d

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    58/111

    Terapi yang d iberikan kepada

    tanaman saki t

    Khemoterapi.

    Perlakuan panas. Menghilangkan bagian tanaman yang

    kena infeksi.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    59/111

    Metoda pengendalian

    1. Regulatory

    2. Cultural

    3. Biological

    4. Physical

    5. Chemical

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    60/111

    Regulatory control

    Menangkal suatu patogen dari

    suatu inang atau dari suatu areageografis tertentu

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    61/111

    Regulatory Control

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    62/111

    Cultural control

    Mengusahakan tanaman terhindar dari

    kontak dengan patogen, mengusahakan

    kondisi lingkungan tidak menguntungkanbagi patogen dan melenyapkan atau

    mengurangi jumlah patogen pada suatu

    tanaman, lahan atau wilayah

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    63/111

    Biological control

    Meningkatkan resistensi inang atau

    menciptakan kondisi yang menguntungkan

    bagi mikroorganisma antagonistik bagi

    patogen

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    64/111

    Physical and chemical control

    Melindungi tanaman dari inokulum patogen

    yang sudah ada atau akan ada, atau

    mengobati suatu infeksi yang sudah/sedang

    berlangsung

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    65/111

    MENGURANGI LAJU

    INFEKSI

    MENGURANGI LAMANYA

    EPIDEMI

    MENGURANGI

    INOKULUM AWAL

    PENGENDALIAN PENYAKIT TUMBUHAN

    EKSLUSI

    AVOIDAN

    STRATEGI

    EKSLUSI

    TERAPI

    ERADIKASI

    RESISTEN

    PROTEKSI

    TAKTIK

    AVOIDAN

    EKSLUSI

    TERAPI

    ERADIKASI

    RESISTEN

    PROTEKSI

    AVOIDAN

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    66/111

    PENGENDALIAN PENYAKIT

    TUMBUHAN SECARA KIMIAWI

    pestisida

    PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    67/111

    PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO.

    7 TAHUN 1973

    Untuk melindungi keselamatan manusia

    dan sumber-sumber kekayaan alam

    khususnya kekayaan alam hayati, dansupaya pestisida dapat digunakan efektif,

    maka peredaran, penyimpanan dan

    penggunaan pestisida diatur dengan

    Peraturan Pemerintah No. 7 Tahun 1973.

    Dalam peraturan tersebut antara lain

    ditentukan bahwa:

    tiap pestisida harus didaftarkan kepada Menteri

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    68/111

    p p pPertanian melalui Komisi Pestisida untuk dimintakanizin penggunaannya

    hanya pestisida yang penggunaannya terdaftar dan

    atau diizinkan oleh Menteri Pertanian boleh disimpan,diedarkan dan digunakan

    pestisida yang penggunaannya terdaftar dan ataudiizinkan oleh Menteri Pertanian hanya boleh

    disimpan, diedarkan dan digunakan menurutketentuan-ketentuan yang ditetapkan dalam izinpestisida itu

    tiap pestisida harus diberi label dalam bahasaIndonesia yang berisi keterangan-keterangan yang

    dimaksud dalam surat Keputusan Menteri PertanianNo. 429/ Kpts/Mm/1/1973 dan sesuai denganketentuan-ketentuan yang ditetapkan dalampendaftaran dan izin masing-masing pestisida.

    Wh t i f i id ?

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    69/111

    What is a fungicide?

    Fungicides are pesticides that specifically killfungi or inhibit fungal development

    About 40 different classes of fungicides used for

    plant protection

    Classes are based on target site andbiochemical mode of action

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    70/111

    M 14 3 11 1 12 19 2 7 4 33multisite aromatic

    hydrocarbons

    sterol

    biosynthesis

    inhibitors

    QoIs benzimidazoles phenylpyrroles polyoxins dicarboximides carboximides phenylamides phosphonates

    protein-proteinbonds

    lipidperoxidation

    sterol integrationin cell

    membranes

    mitochondrialrespiration in

    complex III

    (cyt b)

    beta-tubulinassembly in cell

    division

    os-1histidinekinase in

    osmotic

    regulationpathways

    chitin(cell wall)

    synthesis

    os-2histidinekinase in

    osmotic

    regulationpathways

    mitochondrialrespiration in

    complex II

    (succinatedehydrogenase)

    RNA polymerase unknown

    Mzmancozeb

    PcPCNB

    Fefenarimol

    Azazoxystrobin

    Tmthiophanate-

    methyl

    Flfludioxonil

    Pdpolyoxin-D

    Ipiprodione

    Ftflutolanil

    Mfmefenoxam

    Fafosetyl-Al

    Chchlorothalonil

    Mymyclobutanil

    Flfluoxastrobin

    Vivinclozlin

    Boboscalid

    Cucopper

    hydroxide

    Prpropiconazole

    Pypyraclostrobin

    Tdtriadimefon

    Tftrifloxystrobin

    Trtriticonazole

    CCllaassssiiffiiccaattiioonnTTaabblleeooffTTuurrffggrraassssFFuunnggiicciiddeess

    bbaasseeddoonnmmooddeeooffaaccttiioonnmmoorreeiinnffooaattwwwwww..ffrraacc..iinnffoo

    aanndd

    wwwwww..ttuurrffppaatthhoollooggyy..uuccrr..eedduu

    Multi-site Site-specific

    Systemicity

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    71/111

    Systemicity

    Do not penetrate into plant

    Redistribute on plant

    surfaces Multi-site inhibitors

    Kills spores/inhibitsgermination

    Protectant only

    Broad spectrum

    Penetrate into plant

    Redistribute on & within

    plants Single-site inhibitors

    Inhibits spore germinationand or mycelial growth

    Protectant and curative

    Selective

    Non-systemic Systemic

    Non systemics

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    72/111

    Non-systemics

    Mimimal redistribution fromthe point of deposition

    Works by contact with the

    fungus

    Adequate coverage isessential

    On the cuticle

    Redistributed washed off by

    water EBDCs, Chlorothalanil, etc.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    73/111

    Systemics

    Local Systemic

    Local redistribution

    from the point of

    deposition On the cuticle

    Through the leaf

    (translaminar)

    Extent is variable

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    74/111

    Systemics

    Limited systemic

    (acropetal penetrant)

    Good movement from

    the point of application Through tissues

    Inside the vasculature

    Bulk movement

    DMIs, Phenylamides

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    75/111

    Systemics

    True Systemics(Basipetal penetrant)

    Only one fungcide

    Fosetyl-Al Moves through plant

    Down into roots

    Good against soil-

    borne oomycetes

    Single Site v Multi-site

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    76/111

    Single Site v. Multi site

    Systemic v. non-Systemic

    Protectant only

    Can wash off

    Shorter application

    intervals

    Broad spectrum

    Low Risk of Resistance

    Protectant and curative

    Less prone to washing off

    Longer application

    intervals

    Selective

    High Risk of Resistance

    Non-systemic/Multi-Site Systemic/Single Site

    Pola Laku Kimiawi pada

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    77/111

    Biological mode of action

    Aksi Fungisida dapat diekspresikan melalui

    salah satu dari dua cara ekspresi fisik

    Penghambatan perkecambahan

    spora.

    Penghambatan pertmbuhan jamur.

    Pola Laku Kimiawi pada

    Pengendalian Penyakit Tanaman

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    78/111

    Physiological mode of action

    Apa yang terjadi pada tingkatan

    seluler shg dapat menyebabkanpengaruh visibel pada

    perkecambahan spora dan

    pertumbuhan jamur?

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    79/111

    Mengapa perlu mengenali pola laku

    fungisida secara fisiologis?

    For resistance management and preservation of fungicide

    effectiveness.

    Untreated

    Treated

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    80/111

    The physiological mode of

    action Fungicides are metabolic inhibitors andtheir modes of action can be classified into

    four broad groups.

    Inhibitors of electron transport chain. Inhibitors of enzymes.

    Inhibitors of nucleic acid metabolism and

    protein synthesis.

    Inhibitors of sterol synthesis.

    A typical cell and cell components

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    81/111

    A typical cell and cell components

    Electron transport chain

    Enzymes

    Nucleic acid metabolism

    and protein synthesis

    Sterol synthesis

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    82/111

    Inhibition of electron transport chain

    (Respiration in mitochondria) Sulfur

    Disrupts electron transport along the

    cytochromes

    Strobilurins (azoxystrobin, kresoxim-methyl,pyraclostrobin, trifloxystrobin)

    Inhibit mitochondrial respiration, blocking the

    cytochrome bc1 complex.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    83/111

    Synthesis from Natural Products

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    84/111

    Oudemansin A

    O

    OO

    O

    Strobilurin A

    OO

    O

    Enol ether stilbene

    OO

    O

    Enol Ether Group

    CN

    O O

    N N

    OO

    O

    Oxime Ether Group

    O

    OON

    O

    Synthesis from Natural Products

    Inhibition of enzymes

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    85/111

    Inhibition of enzymes

    Copper

    Nonspecific denaturation of proteins andenzymes.

    Dithiocarbamates(maneb, manzate, dithane, etc)

    Inactivate SH groups in amino acids, proteins

    and enzymes.

    Substituted aromatics(chlorothalonil, PCNB)

    Inactivate amino acids, proteins and enzymes

    by combining with amino and thiol groups.

    Organophosphonate(fosetyl-Al)

    Disrupts amino acid metabolism.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    86/111

    Inhibition of nucleic acid metabolism

    and protein synthesis

    Benzimidazoles(thiophanate-methyl)

    Inhibit DNA synthesis (nuclear division).

    Phenylamides(mefenoxam) Inhibits RNA synthesis.

    Dicarboximides(iprodione, vinclozolin)

    Inhibits DNA and RNA synthesis, cell divisionand cellular metabolism.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    87/111

    Inhibition of sterol synthesis

    (Inhibit demethylation of ergosterol)

    Ergosterol is the major sterol in most fungi.

    It is essential for membrane structure and function.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    88/111

    Sterol inhibiting fungicides

    Imidazoles(imazalil)

    Triazoles(propiconazole, myclobutanil,

    tebuconazole, triflumazole) Morpholines(dimethomorph)

    Inhibits sterol production at different site than

    imidazoles and triazoles. Affects cell wall

    production.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    89/111

    Biological control of plant

    pathogensChristine Roath

    O i

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    90/111

    Overview

    What is biological control, what are thebenefits to its use

    Mechanism of biological control

    Requirements of successful biocontrol

    Working example of biocontrol

    What is biological control?

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    91/111

    What is biological control?

    First coined by Harry Smith in relation tothe biological control of insects

    Suppression of insect populations by native or

    introduced enemies Generic terms

    A population-leveling process in which the

    population of one species lowers the numberof another

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    92/111

    Why use biological control?

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    93/111

    Why use biological control?

    WILL: Chemical pesticides

    Implicated in ecological, environmental, and human healthproblems

    Require yearly treatments

    Broad spectrum Toxic to both beneficial and pathogenic species

    BUT:

    Biological control agents Non-toxic to human

    Not a water contaminant concern Once colonized may last for years

    Host specific Only effect one or few species

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    94/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    95/111

    Mechanisms of biological control of

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    96/111

    g

    plant pathogens

    Destructive mycoparasitismtheparasitism of one fungus by another

    Direct contact

    Cell wall degrading enzymes Some produce antibiotics

    Example

    Trichoderma harzianum, BioTrek, used as seedtreatment against pathogenic fungus

    Requirements of successful

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    97/111

    q

    biocontrol

    1. Highly effective biocontrol strain must beobtained or produced

    a. Be able to compete and persist

    b. Be able to colonize and proliferatec. Be non-pathogenic to host plant and

    environment

    Requirements of successful

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    98/111

    q

    biocontrol

    2. Inexpensive production and formulationof agent must be developed

    a. Production must result in biomass with

    excellent shelf liveb. To be successful as agricultural agent must

    be

    i. Inexpensive

    ii. Able to produce in large quantities

    iii. Maintain viability

    Requirements of successful

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    99/111

    biocontrol

    3. Delivery and application must permit fullexpression of the agent

    a. Must ensure agents will grow and achieve

    their purpose

    Coiling of Trichodermaaround a pathogen.(Plant Biocontrol by Trichoderma spp. IlanChet, Ada Viterbo and Yariv Brotman)

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    100/111

    Plant pathogen control by

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    101/111

    Trichoderma spp.

    How is it applied?

    Favored by presence of high levels of plant roots

    Some are highly rhizosphere competent

    Capable of colonizing the expanding root surface

    Can be used as soil or seed treatment

    http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/biocontrol/pathogens/images/trichoderma3.jpg

    Plant pathogen control by

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    102/111

    Trichoderma spp.

    Action against pathogenic fungi

    1. Attachment to the host

    hyphae by coiling

    a. Lectin-carbohydrate

    interaction

    (Hubbard et al., 1983. Phytopathology 73:655-659).

    Plant pathogen control by

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    103/111

    Trichoderma spp.

    Action against pathogenic fungi

    2. Penetrate the host cell walls by

    secreting lytic enzymes

    a. Chitinases

    b. Proteases

    c. Glucanases

    (Ilan Chet, Hebrew University of Jerusalem).

    Plant pathogen control by

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    104/111

    Trichoderma spp.

    Some strains colonize the root withmycoparasitic properties

    Penetrate the root tissue

    Induce metabolic changes which induceresistance

    Accumulation of antimicrobial compounds

    Plant pathogen control by

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    105/111

    Trichoderma spp. Commercial availability

    T-22 Seed coating, seed pieces, transplant starter

    Protects roots from diseases caused by Pythium,Rhizoctoniaand Fusarium

    Interacts with the Rhizosphere, near the root hairs

    and increases the available form of nutrients

    needed by plants.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    106/111

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    107/111

    SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF

    SOIL-BORNE PLANT DISEASES

    a reduc t ion of

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    108/111

    a reduc t ion of

    biod ivers i ty of

    so i l organisms

    Soi l-borne

    diseases

    Resto r ing beneficial

    organism s that attack,

    repel, or o therwise

    antagonize disease-causing pathogens w i l l

    render a soil disease-

    suppressive

    Plants grow ing in

    disease-sup pressive soi l

    resist diseases much

    bet ter than in so i ls low inbio log ical divers i ty.

    Benef ic ial organisms can be

    added d irect ly, or the soi lenv i ronment can be made mo re

    favorable for them throug h us e

    of compost and other organic

    amendments.

    Compost qual itydetermines its

    effectiv eness at

    suppress ing

    soi l-borne plant

    diseases.

    Why Disease?

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    109/111

    yPlant diseases result when a susceptible host

    and a disease-causing pathogen meet in a

    favorable environment

    If any one of these threeconditions were not met,

    there would be no

    disease.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    110/111

    Many intervention practices (fungicides,methyl bromide fumigants, etc.) focus on

    taking out the pathogen after its effects

    become apparent.

    How to emphasizes on making the

    environment less disease-favorable and thehost plant less susceptible.

  • 8/12/2019 Kuliah Fitopat Disease Progress

    111/111