Upload
adrian-carter
View
264
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
1
MER301: Engineering Reliability
LECTURE 10:
Chapter 4:Decision Making for a Single Sample, part 3
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
2
Summary of topics Inference on the Mean of a Population,
Variance Unknown
Confidence Interval,Variance Unknown
Inference on the Variance of a Normal Population
Inference on Population Proportion
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on the Mean of a Population, Variance Unknown- the t-test
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
4
Inference on the Mean of a Population, Variance Unknown
For cases where both the mean and variance of a population are unknown AND the population is normally distributed, then the t-distribution can be used for hypothesis testing. The Test Statistic is the same form as the Z based statistic but the underlying distribution used to interpret the results is different
The t-distribution applies for small sample sizes, in fact for n greater than or equal to 2
nS
Xt
/0
0
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
5
Inference on the Mean of a Population, Variance Unknown
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
6
The t-distribution for several degrees of freedom The number of degrees of
freedom k or is equal to n-1 where n is the number of samples
For n>30,the t-distribution approaches the standard normal distribution
For small k or n,the tails of the t-distribution include a greater proportion of the area.
The t-distribution is symmetric about zero
1 nk
Normal distribution
k
k
4-15
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
16 Sample Data Sets- mean =48, standard deviation= 3
Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Set 6 Set 7 Set 8 Set 9
1 47.1 44.17 48.73 51.83 51.6 53.2 41.45 47.3 51.29
2 44.74 45.93 42.93 42.46 45.07 45.68 41.65 46.3 46.79
3 48.4 46.9 47.02 46.89 52.03 47.74 47.44 46.46 53.92
4 50.6 55.13 46.04 52.98 43.16 49.62 50.71 53.76 47.75
5 46.43 50.03 46.86 50.27 43.67 45.46 43.44 46.91 47.9
6 48.08 47.03 54.58 42.77 45.79 40.27 52.34 44.16 46.04
7 50.27 49.4 50.62 49.79 43.88 44.65 50.08 48.97 45.18
8 47.28 48.39 49.67 48.42 45.27 53.65 49.46 48.22 50.49
9 50.59 46.09 45.23 51.33 44.4 43.32 50.13 49.92 54.6210 52.33 51.91 48.34 48.01 49.36 47.92 44.84 42.68 50.4811 49.33 49.85 48.64 44.92 51.71 47.07 45.48 45.54 46.7112 46.64 46.43 50.55 49.54 46.18 51.91 42.72 49.65 47.6513 48.13 46.04 46.35 50.55 50.41 49.37 50.07 52.89 48.91
14 49.77 53.56 46.99 51.11 48.43 51.42 47.56 45.66 51.23
15 46.25 49.6 49.64 47.05 46.68 43.9 53.98 46.3 48.2616 47.3 56.51 51.76 50.64 52 48.56 49.63 47.25 44.34
16/
480s
xt
16/3
48x
z
Cumulative Dist
Z to z-dist t-dist48.3275 0.5023358 0.43667 0.65195 0.66882 0.733645
49.185625 0.8903234 1.58083 1.33168 0.94304 0.890171248.371875 0.7022192 0.49583 0.52957 0.68999 0.694607
48.66 0.783431 0.88 0.84245 0.81057 0.787997247.4775 0.8178353 -0.6967 -0.6389 0.24301 0.2703779
47.73375 0.940054 -0.355 -0.2832 0.36129 0.392096447.56125 0.9694005 -0.585 -0.4526 0.27927 0.3314294
47.623125 0.7279616 -0.5025 -0.5177 0.30766 0.309333348.8475 0.7370965 1.13 1.14978 0.87076 0.8582784
16/SSampleX 16
Comparison of normal (Z) and t-distributions
0t
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
16 Sample Data Sets- mean =48, standard deviation= 3
Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Set 6 Set 7 Set 8 Set 9
1 47.1 44.17 48.73 51.83 51.6 53.2 41.45 47.3 51.29
2 44.74 45.93 42.93 42.46 45.07 45.68 41.65 46.3 46.79
3 48.4 46.9 47.02 46.89 52.03 47.74 47.44 46.46 53.92
4 50.6 55.13 46.04 52.98 43.16 49.62 50.71 53.76 47.75
5 46.43 50.03 46.86 50.27 43.67 45.46 43.44 46.91 47.9
6 48.08 47.03 54.58 42.77 45.79 40.27 52.34 44.16 46.04
7 50.27 49.4 50.62 49.79 43.88 44.65 50.08 48.97 45.18
8 47.28 48.39 49.67 48.42 45.27 53.65 49.46 48.22 50.49
9 50.59 46.09 45.23 51.33 44.4 43.32 50.13 49.92 54.6210 52.33 51.91 48.34 48.01 49.36 47.92 44.84 42.68 50.4811 49.33 49.85 48.64 44.92 51.71 47.07 45.48 45.54 46.7112 46.64 46.43 50.55 49.54 46.18 51.91 42.72 49.65 47.6513 48.13 46.04 46.35 50.55 50.41 49.37 50.07 52.89 48.91
14 49.77 53.56 46.99 51.11 48.43 51.42 47.56 45.66 51.23
15 46.25 49.6 49.64 47.05 46.68 43.9 53.98 46.3 48.2616 47.3 56.51 51.76 50.64 52 48.56 49.63 47.25 44.34
Cumulative Dist
Z to z-dist t-dist48.3275 0.5023358 0.43667 0.65195 0.66882 0.733645
49.185625 0.8903234 1.58083 1.33168 0.94304 0.890171248.371875 0.7022192 0.49583 0.52957 0.68999 0.694607
48.66 0.783431 0.88 0.84245 0.81057 0.787997247.4775 0.8178353 -0.6967 -0.6389 0.24301 0.2703779
47.73375 0.940054 -0.355 -0.2832 0.36129 0.392096447.56125 0.9694005 -0.585 -0.4526 0.27927 0.3314294
47.623125 0.7279616 -0.5025 -0.5177 0.30766 0.309333348.8475 0.7370965 1.13 1.14978 0.87076 0.8582784
16/SSampleX 16
Xbar z-dist t-dist49.19 0.943 0.8948.85 0.871 0.85848.66 0.811 0.78848.37 0.69 0.69548.33 0.669 0.734
48 0.5 0.547.73 0.361 0.39247.62 0.308 0.30947.56 0.279 0.33147.48 0.243 0.27
16/
480s
xt
16/3
48x
z
Comparison of Z and t Distributions
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
47 47.5 48 48.5 49 49.5
Sample Mean Xbar
cum
ula
tive
dis
trib
uti
on
phi(z)
t-dist
distzdistt
Comparison of normal (Z) and t-distributions
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
9
Percentage Points of a t-distribution
The t-distribution is symmetric about zero so that
and for all = k
,,1 tt
0.0,5.0 t
4-16
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Percentage Points of a t-distribution
10
,,1 tt
1 nk
,t
0.0,5.0 t
ns
xt
/0
0
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
11
Hypotheses TestingVariance Unknown
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
12
Hypothesis Testing with the t-distribution
4-19
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
13
Text Example 4-7 :Hypothesis Testing with the t-distribution
15 golf clubs were tested to establish the ratio of the outgoing velocity of the golf ball to its incoming velocity(coefficient of restitution). A high coefficient is good. The designers want to know if the mean coefficient of restitution exceeds 0.82. The Test Hypotheses are
The desired significance level is so that
82.0:
82.0:
1
0
H
H
05.0761.114,05.0 t
Restitution Coeff0.8411
0.858
0.80420.81910.8532
0.873
0.81820.84830.82820.81250.82760.83590.875
0.7983
0.866
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
14
P-value for a t-test P-value is the smallest level
of significance for which the null hypothesis would be rejected Tail area beyond the
value of the test statistic
For a two sided test this value is doubled
Drawing a sketch to clarifywhat is being asked is often
very helpful….
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Percentage Points of a t-distribution
15
,,1 tt
1 nk
72.20 t
0.0,5.0 t
ns
xt
/0
0
005.001.0 p
4-16
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
16
Type II error for a t-test The Type II Error for a t-test is the probability that the
Null Hypothesis is accepted when it is false. To compare the Null Hypothesis to an Alternative Hypothesis where the true mean is given by a quantity d (the number of standard deviations between the two means)is calculated where for a two sided test
The quantity , the required level of significance and the number of samples n determine
0
d
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
17
Type II error for a t-test The equations for have been integrated
numerically for selected values of and n and the results are in the Appendix
d,
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Type II error for a t-test
nconstn
One sided
Two sided
05.0
01.0
05.0
18
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
19
Confidence IntervalVariance Unknown
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
20
Confidence IntervalVariance Unknown
82608.0
0
1
0
82.0:
82.0:
Hreject
H
H
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
21
Example 10.2 Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide are both
products of fossil fuel consumption. These compounds can be carried long distances and converted to acid before being deposited in the form of “acid rain.”
Data are obtained on the sulfur dioxide concentration (in micrograms per cubic meter) in the Adirondacks
Determine the 95% confidence interval on the mean sulfur dioxide concentration in this forest
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on the Variance of a Normal Population
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
23
Inference on the Variance of a Normal Population
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
24
The Chi-Squared Distribution
4-21
4-22
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
The Chi-Squared Distribution
25
2
220
)1(
Sn
20
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
26
Inference on the Variance of a Normal Population Hypothesis Tests on the variance can be two sided or
one sided. For the Two Sided Test the hypothesis would be rejected if or if
where the hypothesis is given as
21,2/
20 n 2
1,2/12
no
4-23
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
27
Hypothesis Testing on Variance
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
28
Confidence Limit on Variance
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
29
Example 10.3 One random variable studied while designing the front
wheel drive half shaft of a new model automobile is the displacement (in millimeters) of the constant velocity (CV) joints. With the joint angle fixed at 12o, twenty simulations were conducted.
Engineers claim that the standard deviation in the displacement of the CV shaft is less than 1.5mm.
Do these data support the contention of the Engineers? Estimate the Confidence Interval on the standard
deviation for this data set
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
30
Example 10.3 Data
Displacement(mm)6.2 4.2 2.54.6 4.2 1.53.5 3.7 4.94.1 2.6 1.31.4 3.2 3.74.8 4.4 3.91.9 1.1
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009 31
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Many See Economy as Top Problem-Population Proportion and Political Sampling
By ALAN FRAM, AP Posted: 2007-10-10 12:47:36 WASHINGTON (Oct. 10) - A growing number of Americans say the economy is the nation's top problem, with the less educated among the
most worried, an Associated Press-Ipsos poll showed Tuesday.
Yet even with a credit crunch and soft housing market, economic angst remains well behind war and domestic issues among the public's chief concerns, according to survey results.
Given an open-ended opportunity to name the major problem facing the U.S., 15 percent volunteered the economy. That was six percentage points more than named it when the AP-Ipsos poll last asked the question in July.
"They talk about a big surge in Iraq; well, there hasn't been a big surge over here," said Sadruddin El-Amin, 55, a truck driver in Hanahan, South Carolina, who named the economy as the top problem. "The job market isn't getting any better, not for the working class."
Twenty-two percent of those with a high school education or less named the economy as the country's worst problem, compared to eight percent with college degrees. In addition, 20 percent of minorities cited the economy as the top issue, compared to nine percent who did so in July. There was no real difference between Republicans and Democrats, with just under a fifth of each naming the economy as biggest worry. Foreign affairs was considered the top problem by 42 percent, down from 49 percent in July. Within that category, concern over the Iraq war and other conflicts was named most frequently - by 30 percent - and showed little change since the summer, while fewer people chose immigration as the top issue. Democrats were nearly twice as likely as Republicans to mention war as the primary concern. Domestic issues were named by 33 percent in this month's poll, about the same as the 29 percent who cited them in July. That included eight percent who named morality as the major problem, up from two percent in the earlier survey.
The poll was taken Oct. 1-3 and involved telephone interviews with 499 adults. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
32
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on Population Proportion
In political surveys(and many engineering/manufacturing problems)there are “yes/no” answers and a fixed number “n” of trials. Assuming constant probability, these can be treated as binomial distribution problems
The results can be analyzed using a normal approximation if np>5 and n(1-p)>5
)1( pnp
npXZ
np )1(2 pnp
xnx ppxnx
nxXP
)1(
)!(!
!)(
33
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Population Proportion and the Binomial Distribution with 500<n<2500 and 0.4<p<0.6
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
34
Values of X vs Z for p=0.5
n/Z -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3500 217 228 239 250 261 272 283
1000 452 468 484 500 516 532 548
1600 740 760 780 800 820 840 860
2000 934 956 978 1000 1022 1044 1066
2500 1175 1200 1225 1250 1275 1300 1325
Values of Standard Deviationn/p 0.4 0.5 0.6500 11 11 111000 15 16 151600 20 20 202000 22 22 222500 24 25 24
for p=0.5
0.044
0.032
0.025
0.022
0.02
np/np
)1( pnp
)1( pnp
npXZ
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on Population Proportion
In political surveys(and many engineering/manufacturing problems)there are “yes/no” answers and a fixed number “n” of trials. Assuming constant probability, these can be treated as binomial distribution problems with the unknown being p
The Z term can be written as
npp
pp
npp
pnX
pnp
pnXn
pnp
npXZ
oo
o
/)1(
ˆ
/)1(
/
)1(
)/(
)1(
35
n
Xp
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Hypothesis Testing on a Binomial Proportion
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
36
npp
ppZ
oo
o
/)1(
ˆ
or
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on Population Proportion - Confidence Interval on a Binomial Proportion
37
%4.4ˆ0438.0ˆ499
)50.01(50.096.1ˆ
)ˆ1(ˆˆ 2/
ppp
n
ppZp
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
Inference on Population Proportion - Choice of Sample Size
38
L Berkley DavisCopyright 2009
MER301: Engineering ReliabilityLecture 10
39
Summary of topics Inference on the Mean of a Population,
Variance Unknown
Confidence Interval,Variance Unknown
Inference on the Variance of a Normal Population
Inference on Population Proportion