Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Immune-related adverse
events
Dr Lavinia Spain MBBS BMedSci FRACP
Research Fellow, Skin & Renal Unit
Royal Marsden Hospital, London
Disclosures
• I have no relevant disclosures
Overview
• Background principles
• Gastrointestinal irAEs
– Colitis
• Cardiac and Neurological Toxicity
• Treating patients who have experienced prior irAEs
• Impact of irAEs and their treatment on disease
outcomes
CD4+
Treg
CD8+
T Cell
B
Cell
CD8+
T CellPD-L1
CTLA-4
CD80 / 86
CD80 / 86
CD28TCR
MHC
TCR
MHC
Tumour
APC
PD-1
Normal
Mechanisms of immune related adverse events (irAEs)
Slide adapted, original courtesy of Dr Samra Turajlic
Shared antigens
between tumour &
normal
Loss of self-tolerance
with treatment
Exaggerated response
to non-self antigens
after insult (eg
gastroenteritis, flu
vaccine)
Stimulation of humoral
immunity
Gain of CD8 T cells/loss
of Tregs
From Champiat et al,
Ann Onc 2016
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Ipilimumab
Nivolumab
Ipi+Nivo
Frequency of
irAEs by ICI type in
melanoma
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Ipilimumab
Nivolumab
Ipi+Nivo
All-grade
Grade 3&4
Adapted from Spain et al, Can Treat Rev 2016
%
%
Khoja & Day et al,
Ann Onc 2017
Timing of onset of G3/4 irAEs with nivolumab and
combination ipi+nivo in St IV melanoma
Larkin J et al. Efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups of nivolumab
(NIVO) alone or combined with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone in
treatment-na ̈ıve patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) (CheckMate
067). Eur J Cancer 2015; 51 (Suppl 3): S664–S665.
Toxicity grading – CTCAE v4
CTCAE guidelines, National Cancer Institute
Treatment ICI Location of
care
MILD Supportive
measures
Continue
(except some
pneumonitis/neurol
ogical/cardiac
irAEs)
Outpatient
MODERATE Corticosteroids
Immediate vs
delayed
Withhold ICI Outpatient
with close team
contact or inpatient
SEVERE Immediate
corticosteroids
& additional IMM
if required
Withhold or
discontinue ICI
Inpatient
(some exceptions eg
skin & hepatitis)
LIFE
THREATENING
Immediate
corticosteroids
with early use of
additional IMM
Discontinue ICI Inpatient
& consider transfer
to experienced
centre
General approach to management of irAEs
If likely to be an ir-AE – start steroids in a compromised patient
GASTROINTESTINAL IR-AE’S
Colitis - the flag-bearer of irAEs
Assessment:
Scope & biopsy
Treatment:
Steroids, infliximab
Outcome:
Most patients did well
Eggermont et al Lancet 2015 – adjuvant ipi trial:
It’s not just the colon
• Oesophagitis– Case reports
• Duodenitis– 11/22 (50%) in Marthey et al series (with concurrent colitis)
• Pancreatitis– Michot et al – only 3/21 (14%) with an elevated lipase had
clinical pancreatitis
• Enteritis – Terminal ileum in 20% (Marthey et al)
• Enteric nervous system– Case reports of constipation (Bhatia et al)
• (Liver)
Marthey et al J Crohn’s colitis, Michot et al J Immunotherapy 2018; Bhatia et al J Immunotherapy 2009
Oncologists Gastroenterologists
Patient with colitis
Lower dose steroids
Enteral feeding
No loperamide
High dose steroids
Nil by mouth
Loperamide
Multi-disciplinary care is essential but ideally should be led by the
Oncologist
Anti-CTLA-4 vs anti-PD-1 colitis
Anti-CTLA-4 Anti-PD-1
• Ipi monotherapy G3/4 8%
• Ipi+Nivo G3/4 8%
• Often occurs early
• Macroscopic colitis
predominates
• CD4+ T cells enriched in
mucosa
• Elevated mucosal TNF-
alpha
• Pembro G3/4 2%
• Nivo G3/4 1%
• Can occur later
• Microscopic colitis 20-35%
• CD8+ T cells enriched in
mucosa and intraepithelial
zone
Spain et al Can Treat Rev 2016; Coutzac et al, J Crohn’s Colitis 2017; Collins et al Ann Onc 2017; Spain et al BSG 2018
ir-coli�s ≠ onset of Crohn’s or Ulcerative Colitis
Management- acute (72hrs)
• Assessment of severity
• Decide upon steroids (moderate to severe cases)
– +/- other agents, eg Loperamide – some question use
– Dosing controversy- gastroenterologists prefer 40mg oral
prednisolone, traditionally have used hydrocortisone
• Exclusion of other causes– May be more important in PD-1 related ir-AEs (Collins et al Ann Onc
2017)
• Plan for escalation of Rx – ie ensure baseline serology
for viral hepatitis & TB risk Ax
To scope or not to scope
• Scope ✔– Enables direct look to stratify severity
– Histology important (especially for microscopic colitis diagnosis)
– Helps diagnose superimposed infection (CMV, C difficile)
– Can repeat to assess mucosal healing
• However:– Access to this service can be limited & availability should
not delay acute management
– Invasive (extremely small risk of perforation)
– If flexible sigmoidoscopy – only distal colon is viewed
– If C’scopy normal – could still be small bowel
Discrepancy between symptom grade
and endoscopic appearance
“Grade 2”
Different patients
“Grade 3”
Different patients
“Grade 1”
Same patient (left colon normal,
right colon severe colitis)
Foppen et al, ESMO Open 2018
Distribution & features of ir-colitis
Pancolitis/Extensi
ve colitis
Right-sided colitis Ulcers Ileitis
66-100%1,2,3 8%1 32-79%%1,2,3 20%3
Foppen et al 20171; Verschuren et al 20162; Marthey et al 20163; Spain et al BSG abstract 20184; Collins
et al Ann Onc 20175
Colitis can not be excluded on the basis of a normal flexible sigmoidoscopy
Enteritis can not be excluded by a normal colonoscopy
Biopsies should be taken (especially if mucosa is normal)
Imaging?
• CT– If no immediate access to scope in a patient with
moderate to severe symptoms it’s reasonable to obtain a CT
– Positive predictive value of colitis 96% and steroid-requirement 92% in a series of pts treated with ipilimumab (Garcia-Neue et al Can Imm Res 2017)
• AXR– Not sensitive
– Colon can be empty
– Useful in daily monitoring for possible megacolon
Beyond steroids
• Infliximab (5mg/kg)
– Low threshold if worsening,
or not improving with high
dose steroids in 72hrs
– Use if colitis occurs whilst on steroids
• Mycophenolate mofetil (1-1.5gm bd)
– Takes time to work (days to weeks)
– Good choice if concurrent hepatitis
– Can be stopped
• Vedolizumab
– Alternative to infliximab & may work in refractory cases (Berqvist et al series)
– Gut specific
– Takes a long time for maximal onset of action (14 weeks)
• Other strategies
– Diet modification
– Other agents eg tacrolimus, ustekinumab
Predictive of infliximab use (Foppen et
al ESMO Open 2017; Jain et al WJG 2017):
- Ulcers
- Pancolitis
- High Mayo or van der Heide score
(endoscopic)
Bergqvist et al, Can Immunol Immun 2017
Steroid wean
• IV methylprednisolone 1mg/kg until improvement to G1/2
• Oral prednisolone 1mg/kg, weaning over 4-8 weeks – by ~10mg each week
– if patient relapses – re-institute dose at which Sx controlled and have a low threshold for initiation infliximab
• Iatrogenic impact of steroids is significant– Educate
• insomnia, mood change
– Minimise harm • bone protection, monitor blood pressure & glucose
– Prophylax against infection (consider)• PJP prophylaxis suggested if steroids >20mg for >4wks (Dendle et al IMJ 2015,
JCO 2018)
Colectomy
• A last resort
• We have seriously considered colectomy in 5
melanoma pts at Royal Marsden:
– 2/5 – proceeded to colectomy (one had CMV colitis)
– 3/5 – did not proceed (including a case with severe
superimposed C difficile)
Early surgical involvement
Collaborative decision making
Where to next?
• Further research
– Understand pathological spectrum of ir-colitis
– Biomarkers of susceptibility & severity
– Optimise treatment paradigm
• Tailor to endoscopic and histopathological information
• Can we spare systemic steroids in some?
• Should infliximab be introduced early ie ‘top-down
approach’
• Gut microbiome
CARDIAC AND NEUROLOGICAL IR-
AE’S
When the uncommon becomes
common
• 30% treated with ipi+nivo have >1 toxicity (Sznol
et al JCO 2017)
• 2 of the more insidious ones:
– Cardiotoxicity ~1% (often ‘NR’ in pharma studies)
• Concomitant myositis noted in 23% (Mahmood et al 2018)
– Neurotoxicity ~3-14% (~1% in pharma studies)
Definition of a ‘common’ AE:
occurs in 1/10 to 1/100
ir-cardiac toxicity
• Johnson et al 2016
– 2 cases of fulminant myocarditis with ipi+nivo
• Occurred after 1 dose
– Prompted increased recognition and reporting
Lyon et al, Lancet 2018
Of N=35 patients with myocarditis: 46% melanoma, 11% NSCLC
Mahmood et al J Am Coll Cardiology 2018
Mahmood et al J Am Coll Cardiology 2018
Ir-Cardiac Toxicity–Ix & Mx
• Investigations
– ECG
– Tn, BNP
– Echocardiogram
– Cardiac MRI
– Endomyocardial biopsy
• Treatment
– Low threshold to stop ICI
– Cardiac supportive medication eg diuresis, ACEI, beta-blockers
• Management in a centre with coronary care unit
– Immunosuppression
• Early steroids where indicated (500mg-1gm Methylpred)
• 2nd line: infliximab or MMF; ATG as last resort
Lyon et al, Lancet 2018
Look out for
‘pneumonitis’ that is
actually cardiac failure
Neurological Toxicity is common
Anti-CTLA4 Anti-PD-1 Combination
CTLA4 & PD-1
Spain et al Ann
Onc 2016
1% 3% 14%
Cuzzubbo et al
EJC 2016
3.8% 6.1% 12%
Kao et al JAMA
Neurology 2017
- 2.9% -
Voskens et al
PLOS One 2013
1.5% - -
Zimmer et al EJC
2016
- 3.2% -
~ 1/3 are left with some impairment
Insights from our Marsden experience
with neurological toxicity
• Onset of neuro irAEs is variable in relation to
commencement therapy
• Patients present with atypical symptoms/syndromes
• Some are steroid-responsive (even with GBS-like
syndromes)
• Permanent morbidity may result
• Survival outcomes are very good (small series)
Spain et al, Ann Onc 2017
Spain et al, Ann Onc 2017
Spain et al, Ann Onc 2017
Spain et al, Ann Onc 2017
From Wang et al JAMA Onc 2018
RE-TREATING PATIENTS WITH IR-
TOXICITY
‘De-escalation’ from Ipi to PD-1 is
generally safe
• Menzies et al Ann Onc 2016
• Gutzmer et al EJC 2017
• Caution with cardiac toxicity, pneumonitis,
neurological toxicity and toxicity that is not steroid-
responsive
• Risk:benefit
See page 267 of the
ESMO Immuno-
Oncology handbook!
What about after ipi+nivo tox?
• Pollack et al looked at re-starting PD-1 after ipi tox
– 6% developed recurrent colitis
– 17% developed recurrent hepatitis
• Royal Marsden case series of first 3 pts re-treated
with ipi+nivo, all of whom had prior G3 toxicity:
– 2/3 developed ir-tox
– 1/3 did not develop further ir-tox
– Responses: 2/3 PR, 1/3 SD
Pollack et al Ann Onc 2017; Spain et al, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy 2016
WHAT DO IR-AE’S & THEIR TREATMENT
MEAN FOR DISEASE OUTCOMES?
Does treatment of irAEs reduce
efficacy of ICIs?
• Not when initiated for toxicity– Schadendorf et al JCO 2017- no outcome detriment in those who stopped ipi+nivo for
toxicity in pooled analysis of melanoma pts
– Weber et al ASCO 2017 – no detriment in ORR with high dose steroids or infliximab in
pts with GI toxicity
– Horvat et al JCO 2016 – no detriment with steroids for irAEs in ipilimumab treated pts
• Reduced benefit from ICI in patients who are on steroids or
other immunosuppression at baseline– Arbour et al JCO 2018 - lung cancer series
– Menzies et al Ann Onc 2016, Gutzmer et al EJC 2017
• patients with autoimmune disease already on immunosuppression had a lower response rate
to anti-PD-1
• Antibiotics within first 30 days of ICI treatment may reduce efficacy in
NSCLC & RCC (Derosa et al Ann Onc 2018)
From Champiat et al, Ann Onc 2016
Baseline Ix :
- LFT/TFT
- Brain imaging
- ECG
- Viral serology
Iatrogenic
toxicity
Issues moving into the adjuvant space
• Endocrine implications
– Fertility, reduced life expectancy if develop
hypopituitarism
• Rheumatologic – interferes with work
• Neurological – resulting morbidity
• Toxic deaths will occur
Take home messages
• Research is needed! Management of ir-colitis has not
changed in >10yrs
• Myocarditis and neurological toxicity are ‘common’ and have
a high fatality rate
• Re-treatment with anti-PD-1 after ipilimumab is feasible in a
carefully informed patient
• Treatment of toxicity does not appear to compromise
outcomes – patients should be reassured
• Iatrogenic harm with immunosuppression can impact quality
of life
Thank you
Skin & Renal Unit: Martin Gore, James Larkin, Samra Turajlic, Lisa Pickering