Upload
ling-hong
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LAHP-based theory of building e-commerce customer
satisfaction degree index system
Chunmei Jia1, a, Linghong Yu2,b 1Ningbo University of Technology, China
2Ningbo Nuotch Photoelectric Technology Co,.Ltd,China
[email protected], [email protected]
Keywords: AHP, e-commerce, customer satisfaction
Abstract. According to the development of electronic commerce, this paper analyzed the case of
online shopping e-commerce customer satisfaction factors. Also based on AHP not only established
a customer satisfaction evaluation index system, and rank the factors that influenced the indicators,
and finally to propose a solution.
Introduction
With the advent of information age, we entered the Internet age. Traditional retail has reached the
white-hot level, so some businesses seize the network as the platform into e-commerce markets.
However, whether traditional or e-commence business, customer traffic has always been one of the
major factors which restrict the development of enterprises. Customer satisfaction, which
determines customer volume, further determines the success of enterprise. Therefore e-commerce
customer satisfaction must become a new hotspot. Current e-commerce customer satisfaction
research is still relatively limited, the main research focus on consumer psychology in e-commerce
and e-commerce customer behavior characteristics of the aspects of customer. This paper is going
to have a research on the online-shopping which contributes most to e-commence and gains high
popularity with multi-level gray comprehensive evaluation. Its significance lies in the building of
index system, which will grasp important factors of e-commerce. And this will provide
methodological guidance to attracting and retaining customers for e-commerce businesses.
The domestic and international e-commerce customer satisfaction research
Customer satisfaction status. The customer satisfaction means a feeling state which will be
formed after consumers have compared its expected experience with the perceived effect on an
organization’s all products, including services, activities, conditions and process. In foreign
countries, customer satisfaction research originated in the sixties of last century, Customer
satisfaction researches included researches which discussed the relationship between the customer
satisfaction with the business, performance, profits and expectations, such as customer satisfaction
measurement research, customer satisfaction models, etc. Also they included both qualitative and
quantitative research. In the 90's, most of the studies abroad focused on the relationship between
customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. In 2000, every nation has conducted their own pilot
survey and calculated their national customer satisfaction index, so far more than 50 countries
worldwide, such as the United States, Sweden, and Norway have set up its own customer
satisfaction index.
At present, the domestic theoretical study of customer satisfaction despite increasing, but is still
far behind compared with the level of foreign studies. However, there are also many recent
breakthroughs, Wang Jiankang who has conducted research in the aspect of customer satisfaction
management and many other scholars who have conducted research using the idea of the four maps,
fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, AHP, etc have really made a difference. With more and
more experts joining in, our research on customer satisfaction will be fruitful in the near future.
Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 109 (2012) pp 641-645Online available since 2011/Oct/24 at www.scientific.net© (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerlanddoi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.109.641
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of TTP,www.ttp.net. (ID: 128.42.202.150, Rice University, Fondren Library, Houston, USA-25/11/14,09:27:21)
Online Shopping Customer Satisfaction Status. Early in the last century, with the rise of the
Internet and the development of the network market, many foreign experts have conducted research
on online shopping. The focus mainly concentrates on online retail’s prospects and customers’
response to the situation of on-line shopping in the early 90's. The focus has tended to the factors
that influence the development of online shopping in 20th century. The achievements are widely
distributed, both qualitative and quantitative. Our researches place extra emphasis on the
relationship between the factors and customer satisfaction. Besides some which focus on the
influence customers’ main behavioral characteristics and next purchase. After all, those all give
online shopping customer satisfaction research guidance.
AHP analysis
Introduction to level analysis. Analytic hierarchy process is proposed by professor T.L.Saaty in
the early 1970's and be called AHP for short. It is a simple and practical combination of qualitative
and quantitative analysis method. How much every plan has influenced domestic agricultural
insurance target can be compared by the means of AHP so that the best managerial modes of
agricultural insurance can be obtained. A hierarchical structure Can be obtained based on the
overall goals of domestic agricultural insurance and the idea of dealing with issue according to its
hierarchy. The top hierarchy, which is the overall goal of system and be called “goal hierarchy”, has
only one element. Some intermediary hierarchies, which are the related measures to achieve overall
goal, is called “rule hierarchy”. The bottom hierarchy, which contains measures dealing with issues,
is called “scheme hierarchy”. According to the logic relationship between upper lower hierarchy,
comparing the hierarchy element in pair by the means of hierarchy or net structure, we can identify
priority and set up a ratio relationship.
The basic methods and steps of AHP. To break down into its component elements, AHP has
combined these elements in regular order of dominations relation into a hierarchical structure. And
the tootles sequencing of scheme’s relative importance can be obtained by comparing every
element’s relative importance in pair and anchor points. The process of AHP analysis, design and
decision-making can be divided into 4 steps:
Analyze every element’s relationship and build systemic hierarchical structure;
Compare the importance of one hierarchical every element as to some criteria and establish an
alternative judgment matrix;
Calculate the compared element’s relative weight to the criteria;
Calculate the synthetic weight of every hierarchical element and sort it.
The calculation, analysis and comparison of the model
Establish a judgment matrix according to hierarchy. In the form of matrices, judgment matrix
refers to the relative importance among every hierarchical element. In general, the judgment matrix
is established in order. We shall also establish all the matrices formed by one element and
neighboring relatively elements. As shown in fig 1, A hierarchy and B hierarchy can establish a
compared judgment matrix (shown in table 1), and elements in the matrix are gotten by alternative
comparing (shown in table 2).The above judgment is a subject conclusion based on experience and
comprehension degree to issues. Bj means the comparison between Bi and Bj. For A, Bi is a
relatively important data; Bij is scored by the approach of arithmetic progression.
Table 1. The spreadsheet of A-B judgment matrix.
A B1 B2 ┄ Bn
B1 B11 B12 ┄ B1n
┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄
Bm Bm1 Bm2 ┄ Bmn
642 Emerging Systems for Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing
Table 2: The comparison ratio and interpretation of hierarchy analysis
ratio Bij Implication of interpretation
1 Bi has same influence with Bj The two elements have the same
contribution as to one issue
3 Bi influences a little stronger than Bj One contributes a little more than the other
5 Bi influnces stronger than Bj One contributes more than the other
7 Bi influnces apparently stronger than Bj One contributes apparently more than the other
9 Bi influnces absolutely stronger than Bj One contributes absolutely more than the other
2,4,6,8 Bi and Bj’s influence ratio
between above adjacent hierarchy The interpolation of above adjacent hierarchy
1,1/2,…,1/9 Bi and Bj’s influence ratio The inverse of Bj
The judgment matrix meets the following condition: Bij=1/Bji>0,Bii=1.The judgment matrix of
secretion Bi-Cj and Ci-Dj can be established using the same approach. And the quantitative value is
determined by experts. The absolute data is the average of experts’ evaluation.
Establish a judgment matrix according to hierarchy. Single ordering sorts data according to
the importance of k + 1 hierarchical element to k (C hierarchical element to B or B hierarchical
element to A).The relative distance of data defines the order. And the relatively important data of Bi
for A can be represented by vector or be calculated by Square Algorithm. The vector’s represented
formula is as followed:
W={W1, W2, , Wm┄ } (1)
Consistency checking. To insure the effectiveness of single ordering, we shall conduct
consistency checking. It is evaluated by CR here, if CR < 0.1, it meets condition.
Firstly, calculate consistency index (CI), its formula is as followed:
CI = (λmax - n)P( n - 1) (2)
In the formula, λmax refers to the largest Eigen value of the judgment matrix’s refers to order;
Second we can calculate RI on the basis of n. Combining A-B and B-C judgment, we can
calculate consistency ratio (CR), and the formula is as followed:
CR=CI/RI=∑Wci(CI)i/∑Wci(RI)i (3)
Wci refers to the weight criterion hierarchy relates to target hierarchy.
The total hierarchical sequencing. It refers to the sorting based on the importance A hierarchy
relates to the last hierarchy.
The References Section
The building of customer satisfaction’s evaluation index system. Customer satisfaction degree is
a dynamic system which includes a lot of elements. It is structured according to the problems of
CSD and the features of AHP.
Figures 1 CSD’s three-hierarchy
W
11V 12V
⋅⋅ ⋅
11nV
1U
…
21V 22V
⋅⋅ ⋅
22nV 1mV
2mV ⋅⋅ ⋅
mmnV
2U mU
Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 109 643
Target hierarchy:the target of CSD;
Criterion hierarchy: using the main elements which influence CSD to evaluate;
Element hierarchy: the main elements which influence CSD.
CSD index system is the core of online customer’s satisfaction. To a large degree, it tells us
whether the evaluation results are feasible and reliable or not. The criterion system designed by my
research is as followed. The measurement of information refers to many research papers at home
and abroad and is amended and integrated according to the experts’ opinions.
Table -3 Customer satisfaction evaluation index system weights
Web design
Clarity and friendliness of the page (0.27)
Simple operation (0.12)
Comprehensive search function (0.55)
System is running fast (0.06)
Product
Information
Commodity prices and discounts (0.22)
Logistics costs (0.03)
the presentation of the types of goods (0.18)
Sales of goods and assessment of the situation (0.34)
Product introduction and use (0.05)
Compare the price of the same commodity (0.06)
Commodity information which the customer can refer to (0.12)
Individual
Information
Shopping guide information (0.08)
Dynamic design of product(0.52)
Product experienced information (0.20)
Exchange platform between the customer (0.20)
Quality of
service
Response speed and attitude towards service
staff service level (0.26)
The customer experience and communication skills
Trading
standards
Payment types and process (0.08)
Privacy protection measures (0.37)
Online payment security and reliability (0.48)
System failure rate (0.07)
Logistics and
distribution
Speed and accuracy of delivery destination (0.29)
Customers can track the delivery process (0.08)
The extent of damage in the logistics process (0.63)
Commodity
Inspection
quantity of goods received is consistent with the purchase (0.15)
Description of the goods are consistent with the received (0.55)
Whether businesses solve quality problems that can be solved
(0.24)
The surprise gift (0.06)
Service
Communication channels (0.23)
The clarity of the process of returning (0.08)
The attitude of businesses dealing with the returning (0.45)
Timeliness of complaint handling (0.24)
Corporate
image
Integrity (0.63)
Brand awareness (0.09)
Corporate reputation and consistent level of performance (0.28)
644 Emerging Systems for Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing
To take secondary index for example, using 1-9 methods of scale to take alternative comparison
for the elements in Table 1,if equally important, all take 1;if one is a little more important than the
other, the former takes 3,the latter takes 1/3;if one is apparently more important than the other, the
former takes 5,the latter takes 1/5;if one is especially more important than the other, the former
takes 7,the latter takes 1/7;if one is absolutely more important than the other, the former takes 9,the
latter takes 1/9;those intermediate these shall be valued 2,4,6,8 and their corresponding inverse, and
they establish a weight matrix A.
We can work out the Eigen value of matrix A: λmax=10.1119,and their corresponding
eigenvector are 0.07,0.15,0.04,0.18,0.58,0.28,0.63,0.32,0.10.With the normalization of eigenvector
Wi=Wi/ΣWi, (4)
we can get the standard weight:
W = (0.03, 0.06, 0.02, 0.08, 0.24, 0.12, 0.26, 0.14, 0.04) (5)
As a result of objective complexity and human’s subjectivity, every consequence can not be
exactly consistent. So we shall take consistency checking with extent to insure the rationality of the
evaluation result. If CI= (λmax-n) / (n-1) (n is the order of comparison matrix) values greater, the
more it deviates complete consistency. In the other hand, if CI values lower, the more it closes to
complete consistency.
Recommendations for improving CSD
This paper has found out that product information, logistics and distribution, trading standards and
service are the main factors which influence CSD mostly.
The enterprises which hope to keep the advantage in e-commerce condition and increase
customers’ repurchase rate shall learn how to improve CSD, So this paper put forward the following
recommendations:
Actively explore new logistics and distribution model. In the angle of logistics, because of long
delivery time, there lie a lot of complains. And long-range delivery damaged packaging, loss of
goods and north-south imbalance charges have contributed to customers’ complains too, there is no
doubt that these will lower CSD. In order to reduce the negative influence to min and find a
appropriate logistic model, enterprises shall work hard to improve logistics and distribution
according to its economic statue and logistics management level. It is quotable that alibi has already
built its own logistic system related to its own management and service.
Take efforts to explore the issue of the new e-commerce secure payment technology and model.
The Privacy security shall spare customers more information so that sellers have to reposition the
value of goods to let customers feel substantial. In result, we shall think over to cut down cost, and
on the base of low cost, we shall reward customers.
Supply abundant species and favorable price.
Establish consummate customer service system and speed up web response.
References
[1] Hu Yonghong, He Enhui. Comprehensive evaluation method [M] Beijing: Science Press, 2000
[2] Yin Yanling, zengqi, Pan Qidong. Based on artificial neural networks on Customer Satisfaction
Study [J] Value Engineering 2006-10-18
[3] Dong Simeon satisfaction index system and evaluation of e-commerce model [J]. 2007-09-25
Information Development & Economy
[4] Xudong Lei, C2C E-Commerce Customer Satisfaction Analysis [N]. Anhui University 2010-
04-0
Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 109 645
Emerging Systems for Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.109 LAHP-Based Theory of Building e-Commerce Customer Satisfaction Degree Index System 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.109.641