Large Filing Separator Sheet...Deoth to Saturated Soil: 5(* r'WcC^ (in.) Remarks; ftlh j4/«^ Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated Z^aturated in Upper 12" X Water

Large Filing Separator Sheet

Case Number: 07-171-EL-BTX

File Date: 9/28/07

Section: 5 of 5

Number of Pages: 131

Description of Document: Application for certificate Volume 2

Alt \hJO\'\

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION

(1^7 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

Project / Site: j A i U k m ^ Applicant / Owner: Jjrf^'^r^M Investigator: "^' f ^ i i ^ U J k ^ (Uk JUfAjj^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes K No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ^ Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No "K

(explain on reverse If needed)

Date: S^-^^-Q^ County: ^ w j < State: ^ H

Community ID: P*-^ Transect ID: P \ o t \ D : i l ^ - O t U

VEGETATION

Dominant Ptant Species

1. Lpfn\ J ^ y - - * ^ 2. /J.Kfc^.^; A ? O M J H I 3. gjMiV AUKK

5. Qf BiUw ^ )^rt/ife^TvT 6. 7. 8.

stratum Indicator

pl. filÂiV i

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

9._ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). / <?

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other

No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations:

Depth of Surface Water: (in.)

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)

Deoth to Saturated Soil: ^ i ^ f W ^ (!„.)

Remarks:

ftHlî'S iiti*r^ */<//»i»»A

Wetland Hydrology Indicators

Primary Indicators: Inundated

><Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Unes Sediment Deposits

X Drainage Pattems in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: , Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" ^ Water-Stained Leaves

Local Soil Survey Data ><r FAC-Neutral Test

Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No,

Profile Description: Depth (Inches) Horizon

QHV A "

Maîx Colors (Munselt Moistl

Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist)

Mottle Abundance/Contrast

Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. lire, etc.

idH si i r a * i

Hydr ic So i l I nd i ca to r s :

Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime

^Reduc ing Conditions X 'G leyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks :

WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present?

yes\r Yes >v Yes x

No No No

Is the Samp l i ng Po in t W i th i n a Wet land? Yes AT No

Remarks:

I^l^-I - NAJOl^ UPC


(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

Project / Site: t f ^ i i ^ V M i Applicant / Owner: TTW-Erftf/x*! Investigator: ^ ^ f^h f t

Date:__£:Q2^ County: State: / ) z

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes N O V Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No > r "

(explain on reverse if needed)

Community ID: i F ^ Transect ID: Plot I D : J ? M ^ ? r ~

VEGETATION

Dominant Ptant Species Stratum Indicator

1. /^nui s U u J r VhClk 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Domirrant Plant Species

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). _

stratum Indicator

0 Remarks:

^\zM^ fi)^ fi^^yK/vs^^

HYDROLOGY


^ No Recorded Data Available

Field Observattons:



Depth to Saturated Soil: _ l ^ O _ ( i n . )



Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

SOILS

Map Uni t Name (Ser ies a n d Phase):_ Dra inage Class :

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : C o n f i r m Mapped Type? Yes No .

Profile Description: Depth (inches}

O-lfc Horizon

IT" Matrix Cotors (Munselt Moist)

Mottte Colors (Munsell Moist)

Mottle Abu ndance/Contrast

Texture, Concretions, structure, etc.

Hydr ic Soi l Ind ica to rs :

Histosol Histic Epipedon Sul f id icOdor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils

.Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils

.Listed On Local Hydric Soils List

.Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks :


Hydrophy t i c Vegeta t ion Presen t? Yes No V Wet land Hyd ro l ogy Present? Yes No "X^ Hydr ic Soi is Present? Yes _ 5 r No

Is the Samp l ing Po in t W i th i n a We t l and? Yes N o V

Remarks :

^[ f .ôÔ



Project/Site Applicant / Owner: Investigator:,

: m^M M^^01

M { s j j r 1?^ fcpjry

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes V Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No No K No yc-

Date:_5l i :^ County: ^fJ^d*^ State: ' ^

Community ID Transect ID: Plot i O J i f ^ W ^

•îil^^h Pof o^

VEGETATION

Dominant Ptant Soecies Stratum indicator

1 . LOnvftJ Ptr>Ô^^fx\ ^-> ^ t £ i v

5. (^(i^y 5/ r 1 f 6. n . . , U ' ^ S M J P U K i V M M /

8.

Dominant Plant Species S

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

tratum Indicator

Percent of Dominant Soecies that are OBL, FACW. or FAC excludina FAC-). ^ k

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observattons:


Deoth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)

Deoth to Saturated Soil: 5(* r'WcC^ (in.)

Remarks;

ftlh j4/«^



Z ^ a t u r a t e d in Upper 12" X Water Marks XTOrift Lines

Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper

_ X ^ Water-Stained Uaves } ^ Local Soil Survey Data

" ^ FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

12"

SOILS

Map Uni t Name 11 (Ser ies a n d Phase): f \ 0 Dra inage Class: .

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : . C o n f i r m Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description: Depth (inches) Horizon "ncnesi Horizoi

Matrix Cotors fMunsell Moist)

Mottle Colors (Munselt Moist)

Mottie ^^lundance/Contrast

Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.

1 1 ^ K ^ V 0 mt^s

Hydr ic So i l I nd i ca to rs :

Histosol Histic Epipedon

_ ^ Sulfidic Odor _ X Aquic Moisture Regime > d ^ Reducing Conditions )C_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

. Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils




Remarks :


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes k No Wetland Hydroloov Present? Yes >c No Hydric Soils Present? Yes V No

Remarks: i / / / i

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetiand? Y e s ^ No

fM+ -w^3-0 UpC



Project / Site:. IDMM m Applicant / Owner: f J w T f i a g ^ , Investigator: fAtjk u J S ^ M iL f j k - ^

No Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X' Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No >C Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No V


Date: tv: M

S^-^7'^ County: g ^ f t l ^ State: O i i ^

Community ID Transect ID

: H T O T

P\otlD:_0miiMj-

VEGETATION


X X-

4-i L

Dominant Plant Species stratum Indicator

9 . -10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). jL^

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:


Depth to Free Water in Pit: Qn.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: ^ g ^ .(In.)

Remarks:

Wetiand Hydrology Indicators

Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12' Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain In Remarks)

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class:.

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No.

Profile Description: Depth Matrix Colors Mottte Cotors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munselt Moist) (Munselt Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

0-5 A / a i M i - - - \>/f- /^tf/>."

Hydric Soii Indicators:

H istosol Concretions Histic Epipedon H^h Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No K Is the Sampling Point „ ^^ Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes N o . ^ Hydric Soils Present? Yes

No No No

kr -^ v^

Remarks

^ f c Jî/^ gi^ / w U /

j ^ ( ^ ^ - v O 0 V l



Project / S i t e : / ! ^ ^ ^ ^ Applicant / Owner: h<^^'*^> I nvestigator: MffJh L* i i Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes N O X Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ^ No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No V ^


Date: S~^~0'^ County: Of^^*ti^ State: (>^ ^

Community ID: J F f ^ Transect ID: Plot ID:_6wî05i_

VEGETATION

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:


Depth to Free Water in Pit: {in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: Si/rti«t (in.)

Remarks:



V Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Unes Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12'

X Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain In Remarks)


1. PU^v iW (S^-Ujii I-l Pfi M/ 1 2. ^

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW

Dominant Planl Soecies S

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

tratum indicator .

. or FAC exdudinq FAC-). 1 1

Remarks:

SOILS


Taxonomy (Subgroup):. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No.

Profile Description: Depth (inches) Horizon

Q-J6 y

Matrix Colors (Munseii Moist)

Mottte Colors (Munsell Moist)

Mottie Abundance/Contrast

tf^y


Hydric Soil Indicators:

Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions

V Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concrett'ons High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils

Ôrganic Streaking in Sandy Soiis .Listed On Local Hydric Soils List .Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present?

Yes V Yes X Yes V

No No No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetiand? Yes A No

Remarks:

k rfa4^ % l 3 W ir4f , '^^ d^J-^rJ i^^*'^ dm^^^^^ p ^ ^ ^ ^

f^l j^y^0>\ UPL.



MMM^ Project / Site: Applicant / Owner Investigator: MfUf T i J £ Do no rma l c i r cums tances ex is t on the s i te? Yes. Is t he site s ign i f i can t i y d i s tu rbed (Atyp ica l s i tua t ion)? Yes_ Is the area a potent ia l p rob lem area? Yes_

(expla in o n reverse if needed)

No_ No. NO

K _VL

Date :_£Vl^ County: Of/u<^ State: A l l ^

Community \D: aid f j f^l Transect ID: Plot lD:fif/U-6f^

VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator

1. ^ M o &lh^hft^/r^>JfJ c, M m 2. 7 ^nfff>^ fj ariof^n ^ a pACiA 3. TR-yW i>^Âj.-----ifriA ^ p s / n 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.


Dominant Plant Species

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

or FAC excluding FAC-).

stratum

0

Indicator

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY


No Recorded Dala Available

Field Observations:

Depth of Surface Water:

Depth to Free Water in Pit:

Depth to Saturated Soil:

,(in.)

iin.)

7/J .(In-)

Remarks :

Wet land Hydro logy Ind ica tors

Pr imary Ind ica tors : Inundated

Saturated In Upper 12" Water Marks

„ Drift Lir»es Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems in Wetiands

Secondary Ind ica tors : Oxidized Roots Charmels in Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

Map Uni t Name (Ser ies a n d Phase): . Dra inage C lass :

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : . C o n f i r m Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description: Depth iJDches) Horizon

Matrix Colors (IXIunselt Moist]

Mottte Cotors (Munselt Moist)



^ - / o IS I t - ^k^h

ctiye. etc. t[irr\

v / f / f ? a ^

Hydr ic So i l Ind ica to rs :

Histosol ^ Histic Epipedon .Su l f i d i cOdor

Aquic Moisture Regime , Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

. Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils


.Listed On Local Hydric SoUs List


Remarks :


Hydrophy t i c Vegeta t ion Present? Yes No ^ _ Wet land Hyd ro logy Present? Yes No i ^ Hydr ic So i ls Presen t? Yes No X

Is the Samp l i ng Po in t W i th i n a Wet land? Yes N o J ^

Remarks :

/I /)^4r S. '1 &r^H J -K - ^ ^.fÂ

[\(f -vM<^^>

D A T A F O R M

R O U T I N E W E T L A N D D E T E R M I N A T I O N

(1987 C O E W e t l a n d s D e t e r m i n a t i o n M a n u a l )

er: f m r ^ A T / Project / Site: Applicant / Owner: pJ Investigator: 0 ay uM.

Date: S"'3"0'^ County: J t * l ± ^ ^ State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes V^ No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No

(explain on reverse if needed) - ^

Community I D : r ^ M Transect ID: Plot XDIJJMZM.

VEGETATION


1. Tf l ik fH^rô^lS

3. Pi\hsti^h ftîWo

o. 6. 7. 8.

Percent of Dominant Spectes

stratum

h i-

- ^

that are

Indicator

ML

Dominant Plant Species S

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).

tratum Indicator

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:



.(in.)

i in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: ^**trrf-C fin.)



_>£Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits

_>CDrainage Patterns in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12'

X Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

y FAC-Neutral Test Other {Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

ptrtnMsi lVf*i^ iW/* '^* ' '

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):. Drainage Class:.

Taxonomy (Subgroup):, Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No.


0-18 ZZK l l l o _SL

Matrix Colors (Munsell Moist)

Mottie Cotors (Munselt Moist)

Mottle Abu ndance/C ontrast

Texture, Concretions, struct

S' r.etc.

Sf TP



t Reducing Conditions K Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Y e s V No

Remarks:

Pay &<r(K / / o r j U ^ C^^'J^^

f\C-f"voi>» UPL



Project / Site: Applicant / Owner:. I n vesti gator;

M^jeSR SEE^^

WM^ Do no rma l c i r cums tances ex is t o n the s i te? Yes ^ Is the si te s ign i f i can t l y d i s t u rbed (Atyp ica l s i t ua t i on )? Yes Is t he area a potent ia l p r o b l e m area? Yes

(expla in on reverse if needed)

No_ No_ No

^

V

£^^ziA Date:

County: _ ^ j 5 * l A . State: j f H ^

n

Community ID : ^ * " ^ Transect ID: Plot ID: fimA'-ffi'

VEGETATION


1. fivwj A S ^ j T TfCU.

3. Pat a n r ^ > r „ i ^ f J Pft/«( 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Dominant Ptant Soecies

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).

Stratum Indicator

3 1

Z^kt^lL pl^rU p i ^ ^C/^ "^ i^^^r^J

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe tn Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other


Field Observations:




(in.)

Iin.)

Û .(in.)

Remarks :

Wet land Hydro iogy Ind icators

Pr imary Ind ica to rs : Inundated

Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits

____ Drainage Patterns In Wetiands

Secondary Ind ica to rs : Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS


Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No.

Profile Description: Depth Matrix Cotors Mottte Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munselt Moisti (Munselt Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. I incnesi norizon iMunseii Moisti tMunseii moist) Abunoance;i;onTrasi atrocture.

5^)0 / W '> ipyP^?^ f\f' c^Sk


Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor ^__Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List

y i Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ^ Is the Sampling Point Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N o ^ X ^ Within a Wetland? Yes No ^ Hydric Soils Present? Yes xT" No

Remarks:



iiH"^Vv)0^"S

fViiM^M Project f Site: Applicant / Owner: f i i . ^ ^ Investigator:

3r: fTirrlfwr/s'f

^

Date: -0-7 County: (M>u State: W ~ ^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes )C Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No NoK" No^JT

Community I D : P ^ Transect ID: Plot ID: f t f tW-(?^

VEGETATION


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

So(fdi»jJ !/!; p^ •T>*B) C

.-A *#ruLL

' ^ j dîjjfectfg^

Str;

• . •

M / •

tum Indicator

T^C P^W

f 5?«t


9._ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Domtnant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). It'O

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauqe Aerial Photographs Other


Field Observations:

Deoth of Surface Water: fin.)


Depth to Saturated Soil: ^ ' ^ On.)

Remarks:


Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated In Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Unes

, Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

12"

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):, Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup):. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description: Depth I inches) Horizon. nzpr

TT

Matrix Colors (Munselt Moist).

Tm^Zp

Mottle Cotors (Munsell Moist


Texhire, Concretions, Structure, etc. 5tructur<


Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

, Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils


.Listed On Local Hydric Soils List ,Llsted on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes \ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Z ^ No Hydric Soils Present? Y e s ^ L No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes >C No

Remarks:

U ^ - Y J O > 1 UR^



/ i \ ^M i Project / Site:, Applicant / Owner: Investigator:,

fvfjj^fi^Y / ^ ^ ' L f i ^ M ^ / . . j ^

Date:J^2lfl County: v ^ * State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes V Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No Nor No K.

Community ID: J 3 Transect ID: Plot lD:f/tfU-<7^ff

VEGETATION


1. /"r^/^.u) s/>. S ^ ^

3. / r r t i M Ot^^thm^Hoy H ^<Û 4. 5. 6. 7-8.


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.


Stratum Indicator

0

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:



Depth to Saturated Soii:

.(in.)

iin.)

^ / < ^ .(in.)


Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems In Wetlands


Remarks:

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):. Drainage Class:


Profile Description: Depth (inches) Horizon_

t-to. JL





S5 J.W n-




Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No

Remarks:

Ai4^>/^03^4



MEM Project / Site: .,- , Applicant / Owner: f ^ ^ ^ ' f f t V i lnvest igator :_/V)At t ' ' ^ '' X. i A ^ f / ^ R

Date: S'd-O'^ County: (r^î4tt\ State: C> i ^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No "v Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ^


Community m.fMl l^^ Transect ID: Plot ID:/?IHh^-<?>^

VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum

1. Cfj/AnJ amffuft\ S

3. iV n^^v H 4. j ry.^fr . i^^N M ^ ^

6.

Indicator

7. 8.

Percent of Dominant Species that are 1

OBL, FACW


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.


stratum Indicator

/ ( I i i

Remarks:

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photoqraphs Other


Field Observations:



Depth to Saturated Soil: JuJ'fhd nn.)

Remarks:

^ f (T( *W'N ^ K ' & h ^ ^ ' ' ^



jS.Saturated In Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits

X Drainage Patterns in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: X Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper

y Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survev Data


12"

SOILS

Map Unit Name ^ (Series and Phase): r rO Drainage Class:.

Taxonomy (Subgroup):. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No_

Profile Description: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Cotors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Indies) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.


Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List

'b<^ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point Wetland Hydrology Present? yesjK No Within a Wetland? Y e s / ( No, Hydric Soils Present? Ye

Remarks:



^H^vOO^H t i a

Project / Site: H H I M M S Applicant / Owner: TvîfpHij'i Investigator: / ^y fi^

Date: 5 ' - ^ ^ ^ ^ County: ^ ^ v j ^ State: d H

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes K Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No, No, No

Community ID: F ^ Transect ID: Plot ID: pP)a-a>\

VEGETATION


3. J f \ iV } i f ; 4 . - f y t ^ ^ n j i /}1t»ry^)î»nft

5-—IftVk^ Â^ 6. ^

stratum

T - t

<r _£

Indicator

^ t -

ua. T ^ W ' Lt/?l-


9 -10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Stratum Indicator

Percent of Dominant Spectes that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). ^0

Remarks:

^ 0 / y ^ b I d K j ^ i / "

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:




.(in.)

i in.)

> ^ ( in.)

Remarks:

Wettand Hydrology Indicators

Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12' Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-f»(eutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):. Drainage Class:^

Taxonomy (Subgroup):. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No,

Profile Description: Deptii (inches) Horizon

M6 _A iin'h j y


Mottie Colors (Munsell Moist)

Mottte Abundance/Contrast




, Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils




Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydroiogy Present? Hydric Soils Present?

Yes Yes Yes

No>^ No >r No \

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes HoX

Remarks:

JjJ jy)//l ^'^f î)fJ^ ' '^' ^ 7 ^ -fr\fn i^zM^r^f

PVi f ^vOC)^^



Project / Site: ^ \ ^ i h M a Applicant / Owner: T » r i : ' f>*r\i Investigator: fÔiJr l ^ ^ m ^ ^ ad kîk

% Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No V Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No V '


'Z'j-(n Date: Countv: Oîfij^ State: 0 ^

Community ID: I^Ô Transect ID: Plot ID:/gmV-0>0

VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum

1. \Û^) 0mma^9, " T 2. / \ c C i - ^ f / t f l w f l u m i 3. ^v^ji^nitJ />1*^ - ^ { \ ) IK

r -4. j?K/»i.r^ ' I ^ . J K :S 5. ' ^L i fnX >^>*^ H 6. " '

Indicator

^ ? c o i l '

7. 8.

Percent of Dominant Species that are ~ —n OBL, FACW


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

, or FAC excluding FAC-)-

Stratum Indicator

im Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:

Depth of Suriace Water: ' (in.)

Depth to Free Water in Pit: Qn.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)

Remarks:

Wetiand Hydrology indicators

Primaiy Indicators: X Inundated

I^Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12*

^ Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

"X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS



Profile l3escriPtion: Depth (inches) Horizon

n-fe ZK Matrix Colors (Munsell Moisti

m It MOISTI



i^-im (\ j d W h / J V m. Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.

•



Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils .Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils .Listed On Local Hydric Soils List .Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ^ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ^ ^ No Hydric Soils Present? Yes V " No

Is the Sampling Point ^ ^ Within a Wetland? Y e ^ T No

Remarks:

^ i t - ^0'^ ^



Proiect/Site: j ^ l m Applicant / Owner: Investigator:

^*3fFr>faft-J M»* L ! J & ' kA Pjj^tK

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? YesV Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No

No_>SL-No X

Date: S""3-C"1 County: (rf* <f fc. state: Oih ^

Community ID: fiÔ Transect ID: Plot ID:^f l^3*: i^2;3_

VEGETATION


1.A / >^ hirttk»i^^\ 2. f tnytnw y w ^ r ^ W ^ u v 3. i/^L.^v^'^ n t ^ f ^ J ^ ' ^

^•Zt-Kf±Jlt»l jM fJ n/'-t 6. 7. 8.

Stratum

T ,T J :>

- 4 ^

Indicator

TWV m w f^f.fc^ fvv^

. m j ^

Dominant Plant Species Sb-atum Indicator

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). f ^ t

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:

Depth of Suriace Water:

Depth to Free Water in Ptt:

.(in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: J ^L -l-. iin,)

iin.)

Remarks:


Primary indicators: inundated

~^^Saturaied in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetiands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"

y^Water^Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

V^ FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

Map Uni t Name (Ser ies a n d Phase) : Dra inage C lass :

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : Con f i rm Mapped Type? Yes No,


0''"^ ZA 1 1 ^ n





J i hA m £h±. f-


Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulf idicOdor Aquic Moisture Regime

; ^ ^ Reducing Conditions X" Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors


___Organic Streaking in Sandy SoUs ^Listed On Local Hydric Soils List


Remarks :

a LrnpT c h ^f-t ' î r /^^ ck ^ ^ ; ' i f UlTK


Hydrophy t i c Vegeta t ion Present? Yes V* Wet land Hyd ro l ogy Presen t? Yes X Hydr ic So i ls Presen t? Yes

No No No

Is t he Samp l i ng Po in t W i th in a We t l and? Y e s ^ No

Remarks :

p,['\- AÔb~(J U p l ^



Project / Site: I^M^^j^ i i^ Applicant / Owner: "f-/ r ^ r F A l / y 7 Investigator: " ' '^^

2 i^L^ M

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No N o V No V

Date: 5'}-n County: (r f f^^y state: ^ 4

Community ID: J^J Transect ID: Plot lD : i nUzz^2JL

VEGETATION


2. t^\rtf*^J /iI»*Ai- li *r.v*. J Vn-Ci 3. ytKK»rs>ri M^tifcî^ i 0^C 4. >. .* .^4«.^ ^ K c i i ^ M W U f L 5. 6. 7. 8.

Dominant Plant Soecies

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.


Stratum Indicator

fO

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:




an.)

2m-(in.)

Remarks:



Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Unes Sediment Deposits

_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12' Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data

_. FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS





ih/k_ _&. iibja.

jmAiL



l<iU K /a1<? Sfi. F ( 0


zhzf.


Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture RegirYie Reducing Conditions

X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Suriace Layer in Sandy Soiis .Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils .Listed On Local Hydric Soils List .Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

dp' ^p ir^fp^^


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes

N o v No > r

:gZ No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No > <

Remarks:

ShrJo y.Ak^j iJwM'r^ P™ *' y ^ ^ ^ f i^ l f t { m /fi^<^ f j 7

p^^-f.^vOO>7



Project / Site: Appl icant /Owner Investigator:

Madklnkl / M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ g County: 0^*vX*\

state: rfVH^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No V Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes X^_ No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No S ^


Community ID: ^ ^ ^ Transect ID: Plot I D : A i ^ ^ ' 0 4 ^

VEGETATION

Dominant Ptant Soecies Stratum

1. /^ft^'lfk^) G f ^ r h l ^ i t t l , H 2 . ^ 3- y 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

olt^ftftk <i?ft«v4*e. J

u ^ y ^ ^ /-t t V ^ ^ ^ M . . . _ _ p i

Percent of Dominant Species that are

Indicator

pAt fft/U


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).

stratum Indicator

GL

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:



Depth to Saturated Soji:

i in.)

Su ffk^t.

i in.)

iin.)

Remarks:



I^Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks

. Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12' Water-Stained Leaves Local Soii Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

Map Uni t Name (Ser ies a n d Phase): . Dra inage Class: ,

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : . Con f i rm Mapped Type? Yes No .

Profile Description: Depth finches)

ft" 6 . Horizon

A 0

Matrix Cotors (Munsell Moist

%

Mottle Colors fMunsell Moist)

Mottte Abunda nce/Contrast


Imsk M lo JV r r fofkt\

k

Hydr ic So i l I nd i ca to rs :


_V Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soiis Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ^Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks :

lytKp ir^fp*'


Hydrophytic Veqetation Present? Yes V No Wetland Hydroloov Present? Yes >C No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No

Remarks:

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Y e s X No

y n ^ f r ^ ^



:t / Site: îdJikmU :ant / Owner: f \ n \ - R ^ r*\ T ioator: /^<cf j j i h t H U ;

Project Applicant Investigatoi ^g County: i^«4^&

S t a t e : _ a E _ _

Yes_ No Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes \ No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X^


Community ID:JViy Transect ID:.

J M

Plot ID:J?»litMi-

VEGETATION


I.JpYViLi^ tfir«.^4»n^*'•^ 2. l - t m t ^ A.î^S'f^^ff*.

4 . ii?rrs>c*{(fl»-% ^ m f - T ^ M 5. 6. 7. 8.

stratum Indicator Dominant Ptant Snecies

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-)-

Remarks:

r/,- - "ê- /^

Stratum Indicator

^ 5

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge

._.. Aerial Photographs Other


Field Observations:


Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in,)

Depth to Saturated Soil: " ^ ^ 0 (in.)



Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: „ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"

Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remark^:

SOILS

Map Unit Name (Ser ies and Phase) : , Dra inage C lass : .

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : Con f i rm Mapped Type? Yes No,


Q-G _A


iM^




X '&&rrs

k f


. Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulf id icOdor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions

V Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils Ust Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks :

^ b t ^ c l ^ S /(hjsr-

•


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes " ^

1 Remarks:

NoV-No X No

lîiwtPin

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No ^

Pfi^ if J (Usj j h - ^ ^

f^[^ '^^)0^t

DATA FORM

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION

(1987 COE Wetlands Determinat ion Manual)

Project / Applicant Investigator:

Site: / W I M I / M I A t / O w n e i T ~ _ £ ^

1 ^ 1 ^ kf^.ît"^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes NO^ Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No V


D a t e - . S z J j L L County: Tr* * - <t State: fivl ^

Community ID: fi^^ Transect ID: Plot ID: R f Z l i i i J .

VEGETATION


3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.


Stratum Indicator

lo6

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photoqraphs Other


Field Observations:

Deoth of Surface Water: (in.)


Deoth to Saturated Soil: ^ ^flXt^. (|n,^

Remarks:



X ^ Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Pattems in Wetlands


><- Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data


SOILS


Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No,


Matrix Cotors (Munsell Moist)

Mottie Colors (Munselt Moist)

Mottle /^)un dance/Contrast

Q-tv> Jk \im''^>-Imi s tAo




Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain In Remarks)

Remarks:


Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ^ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ZL Hydric Soils Present? Yes >

No No No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ^ No

Remarks:



: fÛ\M Project/Site. , .— .v -^" Applicant / Owner: F " V I F K I nvestigator: /V\<iif- • 'Wlr^. ~MZ Jtff»iN

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Nr No „ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No_V Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No_V


Date:_SlVL^ County: (r-ûû State: S^r ^ _

Community ID: Transect ID

.S5

Plot ID:RiVâ,"-n?

VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Soecies

1. iflbtJA û \ \> lW

3 . '\A<S.fc^c. o<.ftv\<*v

5. 6. 7 . ^ _ _ 8.

^

stratum

S <> \^ w v

Indicator

f^lKK y^{>K

û -


9-_ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). ' 3 ' S

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:


Depth to Free Water in Ptt: (in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: I v iin.)

Remarks:


Primdry Indicators: Inundated

X Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands


SOILS

Map Unit Name (Ser ies and Phase) : , Dra inage C lass :

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup) : . C o n f i r m Mapped Type? Yes No .


A- [ K ikiiov . 6

Matrix Cotors fMunsell Moist)




iiitJ a^w^ iinfi?V m ^

Hydr i c Soi l I nd i ca to rs :


V ^ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors





Remarks :

;V)riJr ffyp* •


Hydrophytic Veqetation Present? Yes No ^ Is the Samplinq Point Wetland Hydroloov Present? Yes >c No Within a Wettand? Yes Hvdric Soils Present? Yes -?< No

NoV

Remarks: «

4,.i> Ui .^ y ^ ^^ - ^ CU. jUr±-



[VH-'V<)6^^V

m\UA Project / Site:. Applicant / Owner: fiJ^âAJ Investiaator: / V W L ^ f f ^ ^ ' i oV / t y >

^

Date: S ^ ^ - Q ' ^ County: f f ^ * " * ) ^ State: - ^ ^ (S

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No K Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X


Community I D : ^ £ _ Transect ID: ^ Plot ID:gw>*V-o"9ft

VEGETATION


2. Cjf^t o t . /-

5. 6. 7. 8.



9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.


stratum Indicator

lod

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauqe Aerial Photographs Other


Field Observations:

Deoth of Suriace Water: (in.)

Deoth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: Su^^Ttf'^ (in.)

Remarks:



><:lSaturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Unes

V Sediment Deposits V Drainaoe Pattems In Wetlands


> < Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data X FAC-Neutral Test

Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS

M a p Unit Name

(Ser ies a n d Phase) : Dra inage C lass : .

T a x o n o m y (Subgroup ) : C o n f i r m M a p p e d Type? Yes N o .

Profile Description: Depth (inchest _ Horizon

Q-H A

Matrix Colors (Munselt Moist)




m


Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor

y Aquic Moisture Regime \ Reducing Conditions

^ s Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Ôrganic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain In Remarks)

Remarks :


Hydrophytic Veqetation Present? Yes '>S No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ^ No Hydric Soils Present? Yes ^ No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Y e s A No

Remarks: ; i

m \^^ CQÂ. u ^

^



Proiect f Site: N\î AU^d Applicant/ Owner: B^)h^*^r^^ Investiqator: l >*Jk L ^ t J - Â i^jV^K

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ts the area a potential problem area? Yes


= X

s

No No >^

No "1^

VEGETATION


£%^ j / ichfr)f^ i f i i

^X'"*^ lifirrAtC

Str^ûm

J

^

Indicator

F ti


9 _ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Date: 5^~J-0^ County: (-^^.wj State: /rU

Community ID:_j^_ Transect ID: , Plot ID: Re^^-Hh

stratum Indicator

Percent of Dominant Spectes that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). W Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:




i in.)

i in.)

>50 (in.)



Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12' Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

S O I L S

Map Unit Name (Series and Phase):. Drainage Class:.

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No_


k A

Matrix Colors (Munselt Moist)




r/ Th




Remarks:



No K

No X^

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetiand? Yes No >

Remarks:

pvH--vM036

•



^m\M Project / Site: Applicant / Owner: h t j V ^ f ^ i Investigator: ) % ^ W tM- h ^ k^'j^^

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? Yes


No No > N o _ ^

Date:4±ri County: 0 *; } State: /)Vl

Community ID :£?£ . Transect ID: PlotlD:f?ft>^^î~>

VEGETATION


1. K^f^ \Kllll«'"hsAWS T f - K W 2. h t . ^ 5A..^-^^..^^^ S T M W 3. \I.W.. ^ . ^ ^ ^ S 9^Lvi 4. C-K^^.w ^,(^ S m ^ 5. 6. 7. 8.


9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

•


stratum Indicator

-^b

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY



Field Observations:


Depth to Free Water in Pit: {in.)

Depth to Saturated Soil: rb^Xt-c (in.)



J^Saturated in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12*

V Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data


Remarks:

SOILS



Profile Description Depth (inches) Horizon

Matrix Cotors (Munsell Moist)



E ructure, j

cU


Histosol Histic Epipedon SulfidicOdor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions

'V Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:



V y ^ y

No No No

Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Y e s X No_

Remarks:

APPENDIX B

OfflO EPA OfflO RAPID ASSESSMENT METHOD (ORAM) FOR WETLANDS V5.0 FORMS AND GRAPH

\

ISite: tf\\ W F W |Rater(s): MflL I Date: W-j^-^"1 |

I ^ I > I Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). ^ ^ u c 6 pts sublolal

f^tAW-Oal f][t^ÔO[

\ ^ \ " ?

s

max W pts. subtotal

s:

s:

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2!â) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres {4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <:10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pte) 0.3 to <3 acres {0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 awes (0.04ha) (Opts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average butter vridth. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average 50m (I64fl) or more around wetland perimeler (7) MEDIUM. Suffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <a2ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32n) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double chectc and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growtti or older forest, prairie, savannaii, wildlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (> 10 years), shorbiand. young second growth forest. (5) A MODERATELY HiGH.^^jggntJak fenced pasture, park, consen/ation lillage, new fallow field. (3) C c A f i j ^ y y ^ HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction, (1) J

\ \\ I [\> I Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pis. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. 3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply.

A 9

1 9 laM max 20 pts. subtoi^

1 ^ H l

Higti pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/Intermittent surface waler (3) V

100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other fiuman use (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Perennial surface water {lake or stream) (5) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. 3c. Maximum water depth. Select one.

l iL

>0.7(27.6in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 lo 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1) x

Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3) Seasonaily inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

^

None or none apparent (12) Check alt disturbances observed Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

X^ ditch tile dike weir stormyNax&r input

Ipoint source (nonstormwater) ; > : J tilting/grading

1 1

road bed/RR track dredging

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

• x

None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Hat}itat devetopment Select only one and assign score.

[ ^

Exceltent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and averse.

X

None or none apparent (9) Check ail disturbances observed Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1) V

mowing grazing clearcutting selective ryo irrg woody debris removal toxic pollutants V

shoib/sapling removal herbaceousyaquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging fanning nutrient enrichment

subtotal this page ORAIvl v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s); Dati

nn sublols) this page

I " U H

max ZOpts. subtotal

s

f >\»Tvii)y>«?-?\

(^n\W-oii\

max 10 pts. subtolal

i

1 ^ 1 ^ C

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Check all that apply and score as indicated. Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetland (5) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrotogy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 5 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale Score ali present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic t>ed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudflats Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low (1) None (0) 6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM long fonn for list. Add or deduct points for coverage Extensive ^75% cov^ (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score afl present using 0 lo 3 scale. Vegelated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6ln) Standing dead >26cm (IOin) dbh Amptiibian breeding pools

I JJLL IGRAND T O T A L ( m a x 100 p t s )

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetland's 1 vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of iow quaiity Present and either comprises significant part of vretland's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality _ _ ^ _ Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's 3 vegetation and is of high quafity

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quaiity Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or low disturtiance tolerant native species Naiive spp are dominant component of the vegetation, mod although rv^nnative and/or disturtiance tolerant native si;:^ can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generaityw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp to A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp high and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, tfireatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality Absent <Q.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very smaii amounts or if more common of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality

Present in moderate or greater amounts

and of highest quality

|^s->-MHUf 'T l i iRater(s): M L i Date: M - jcrr^

( ( I ~\ i Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). l^lAW-oog- AC+-woo>

1 x6pts sublOl^

^ 1 H

^

max 14 pts. subtolal

• ^

V

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres {>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pEs) 10 lo <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 lo <4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm {164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m lo <25m (32fl to <82ft) around welland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of ^jrroundjng land use. Select one or double check and averaîe. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 years), shnjbland. young second grov»rth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, consen/ation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

I n I i\ I Metric 3. Hydrology-max 30 pts. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwaier (3)

X ^ Precipitation (1)

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year fioodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other iwman use (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), comptex (1)

^ < p a r t of riparian or upland corridor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- lo permanentiy inundated/saturated (4) Reguiariy inundated/safejrafed (3)

^ ^

Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) PerKinial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum water depth. Select one. >0.7(27.6in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1) 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regnne. Score one or doutê check and average. None or none apparent (12) Check atl disturbances observed Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recwit or no recovery (1)

J X Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30mi (12in) (1)

ditch tile dike weir stormwater input

><

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging

1 ^ 1 i u I Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. subtolal

h

4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average. None or ^ Qne s^parent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (g) Check ail disturbances observed

'Ssbfub/sapling removal Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

subtotal this page ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

S mowing

grazing clearcutting selective cutling

V^woody debris removal "^""^ toxic pollutants

herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentafton dredging farming nudlent enrichment

^Jte:

rm subtotal this page

|Rater(s): I Date: v_-=

I 0 I >Hl Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max lopts, subtatal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetland (5) Lake Erie coastaf/tributary wetfand-unrestrfcted hydrdogy (10) Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Known occurrence slate/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Questk)n 5 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20pts. sublolal 6a. Wetland Vegetation Comnnunities. Vegetalton Community Cover Scale nn 1"3-

Score alt present using 0 to 3 scate. Aquaiic bed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudflats Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan vievtf) Interspersion. Setect only one. High (5) Moderately hlgh(4) Moderate <3) Moderalely tow (2) Low(1)

^ N o n e (0) 6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduct pointy for coverage Extensive >75% cover (-5)

" 2 Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score atl present using 0 to 3 scale. Vegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) Standing dead ^25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

IL

l i

I i " > - |GRAND TOTAL(max 100 pts)

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wefland's 1 vegetation and Is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low quality Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a smalt part and is of Ngh quality . Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's 3 vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or k)w disturbance tolerant râtive species Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, mod although nonnative and/or disturbance toterant native spp can also be present, and species diversity modâte to moderately high, but generailyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp to A predominance of naiive species, with nonnative spp high and/or disturbance tola^nt native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always. the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 lo <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very small amounts or if more common of marginal qualily Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality



ISite: fV\iUufiiiA |Rater(s): /T\gL i Date: ^-p-^n \

p S I ^ I Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). 6 pts subtotal

r^TTT max 14 pts. subtotal

[jnn max 30 pts. subtolal

/^^-Ô f\[i^vÔ0'h

IS

: i ^

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Bufters average 50m (164ft) or more around wetiand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around welland perimeler (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32fl to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<:3aft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd ôwth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, ete. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, paric, conservatton tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology.

'XT " ^

3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum water depth. Selectone.

^

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4toD.7m{15.7to27,6in)l2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1) 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic reginr

—^ • ^

None or norte apparent (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

••

i l

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part ot riparian or ufdand corridor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to pennanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3)

^ Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (I2in) (1)

Check all disturbances observed

^ diteh tile dike weir stomnwater input

point source (nonstonnwater) ••^filting/grading

road bed/RR track dredging other

I 10 1 ^ ^ I nax 20 pis. subtotal

S

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4)

^ F a i r ( 3 ) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or doubte check and average. None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

s

EH subtotal this page

X

Check all dtsturbances observed mowing grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic |x>iiuiants :>£.

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic kwd removal sedimentation dredging farming nutnent enrichment

ORAM V. 6.0 Field Fonn Quanlitative Rating last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

[Site: |Rater(s): IDate:

USD subtotal this page

^t!\W'GV3

max 10 pts. st^total

0 I ^ I Metric 5- Special Wetlands. Check all tliat apply and score as indicated. Bog (10) Fen <10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wettand (5) Lake Erie coastal/tributaiy wetland-unrestricted hydrotogy (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydnalogy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet PraiiBS (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 5 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Conununities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale

nuR tnax20pts. subtotal

^

S

> ^

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shnjb Foresl Mudflats Open water Other _ ^ 6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0) 6c. Coverage of Invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM tong fonn for list. Add or deduct points for coverage Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-26% cover (-1) Nearty absent <S% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate. Vegetated hummucks/tossucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) Standing dead >25cm (1(Mn) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetland's 1 vegetation and is of moderate c^jatity, or comprises a significant part but is of low quality Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's 3 vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegetation QuaUty

Low spp diversity andfrx predominance of nonnative or low disturbance tolerant native species Native spp are dominant component of tine vegetation, mod although nonnative and/or disturtiance toterant native spp can also be present, emd species diversity moderate to moderately high, txit generallyw/o presence of rare threatened or endar>gered spp to A predominance of native species, with rtonnative spp H ^ arKl/or disturtiance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Class QuaHty Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2,47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

I - \ ^ IGRAND TOTAL(max 100 pts)

High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very small amounts or if more common of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality



ISite: t^g.vSLxx |Rater(s); ^ ^ 1 DateH^?()-7^

I O- I 'V I Metric 1. Wetiand Area (size). p^li -W<ÔÎ 6 pis subtolal

'S<

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 lo <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1tia) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha)(1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

^rnW-OOM

I 1> I 5 I Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. subtotal

"5

I O i iw

2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERV NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of sunounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. ete. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 years)jjhaând, young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Blîdentlat^ fenced pasture, pari<, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction, (1)

max 30 piS- sublotal

^

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Per^nial surface water (lake or stream) (5> 3c. Maximum water depth. Select one. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6(0} (2) <0.4m(<15.7ln)(1)

Ik:

:>c

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of vjretiand/uptand (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part of riparian or upland conidor (1) 3d. Duration inundatton/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regularty inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

: ^ ditch tile dike weir stormwaler input

1 ^ 6 I \'\-^ I Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. sublet 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat development Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(l) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average.

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dred^ng

^ . > p t

subtotal

1 \' ^

IS None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

subioi mis page ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Ghed< all disturbances observed mowing

grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentaticxi dredging farming nutrtent enricnment

ISite: Rater(s): I Date:

UEH subiot^ this page ^mY/'OO^

I Cs I Y T \ Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growrth forest (10) Mature forested wetland (5) Lake Erie coastalrtributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetiand-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered spedes (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 5 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. /nax20pis. sub!ot3f 6a. We t l and Vegeta t ion Commun i t i es . Vegetation Community Coyer Scale i -M I '^^

^

fU\ *nV K.

fpff r^^^ .-W-

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudflats Open vrater Other 6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select onty one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(i) None (0) 6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM long fonn for list. Add or deduct points for coverage Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Vegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15an (6in) Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetiand's 1 vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low quality Presenl and either comprises significant part of wetland's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality . ^ _ _ ^ ^ _ ^ Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's 3 vegetation and is of high quality

Narrathre Description of Vegetation Quality Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or low disturbance lolerant native species _ _ ^ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ _ Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, mod although nonnative and/or disturtiance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp to _ _ ^ _ _ _

»

A predominance of native species, vi/ith nonnative spp high and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, tiireatened, or ^dangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Ciass Quality Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

I \ g . 3 IGRAND TOTAL(max 100 pts)


Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very small amounts or if more common of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality



j s i t e : Mt 'JJlg^'^^ Rater(s): M L Date: ^ -20-on

2 jMet r i c 1. Wetland Area (size). f\|^H-^VAjOCS

fnaxBpis,

H ]

Selectone size dass and assign sc<»6. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (12 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

I m ^ ^ ^ ^

[Q IMetric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pte. 2a. Calculate average bufler width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WlOE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around weUand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 2Sm to <50m (82 to <164fl) aroimd wettand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average lOm to <25m (3211 to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m(<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2r^ growtii or okjer fbrest prairie, savannah, witdlife area, etc (7) LOW. OM fiekl (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth forest (5) M03ERATELY HIGH, ftesidwitel. fenced pasiure, partt. corêrvatkin tillage, new faUow field, (3) HIGH. LM)an, Industrie, open pasture, row cropping, mining, constructicm. (1)

0 1 1^ jMetric 3. Hydrology. max 30 Ms. subtotal 3b.

3d.

Sources of Watw. Sc(»e^lthatsqoi:^ Hi£^ pH groundwater (5) Other grounc^water (3)

y i Precipitation (1) V Seasonal/lntennittent surface water (3)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maxjnum water depth. Select only one and assign score

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) ,<0. Y\ (<15.7in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrdogic fegime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) I Recovered (7) Recovering (3)

IRecent or no recovery (1)

Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) B^weOT stream/lake and other human iê (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. torest), complex (1)

^>? Part of ripsian or uptand oonido- (1) Duratton inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

Semi- to pemianentiy Inundated/saturated (4) ^ ^ F ^ i i a r i y inundated/saturated (3) ">^Seasona8y mtâted (2)

Seasonally saturated in upper 30Gm (12in) (1)

Ched( ail dtsturt)ances obsen/ed ditch tile dike weir stormwater input

point source (n<Histonnwater} fOllng/grading road bed/RR ti'ack dredging

other

11 11 Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. 4a.

4b.

4c.

Sidsstrate dislurtjance. Score one or double check and average-None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

Hafcttat devetopment. Select only one and assign score. Exceltent (7) Very good (6> Good(S) Moderately good (4)

X [Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor{1)

Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average.

m

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

sutHOt&tttii&page

Check alt disturtiances observed 2 ] mowing

grazing clearcutting selective cutting wtrady det>ris removal toxic pollutants

shrub/sapling removal iierbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentatbn dredging farming nutilent enrichment

(acf fav.'lcf^^ 1 F s i h o m " ' Onn i

|Site: Rater(s): IDate:

^ ^

0

'^m^'O^fP ^ ^ IMetric 5. Special Wetlands.

maxiOpts- subutai

s

Check all that apply and score as Indtoated.

0Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Okt gnswth forest (10)

Mature forested wetiand (6)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary weUand-unrestricted hydrology (10)

l ake Erie coastal/tributaiy wetland-rsstricled hydrotogy (5)

Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Rettet Wet Praires (10)

Known occunence stateffederal threatened or endangered species (10)

BSignfficant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Qualitalive Rating (-10)

3V Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20 pta suwoiai 6a. WeUand Vegetatton Communities. Vegetation CowwrnmHy Covwr S c ^ e

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale.

Aquatic bed

_ / Emeiîent

_-3 Shn*)

f=orest

Mudflats

[Open water

OUier

& i . horizontal (plan view) Intorspersfon.

Setect only one.

High (5)

Moderately Ngh(4)

Moderate (3)

^ Moderately low (2)

Low( i )

None(0)

6c. Coverage of inv£»ive plants. R e f ^

t oTab le l ORAM tong fomi for l ist Add

or deduct pants for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-S)

Moderate 25-75% cover (-3)

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1)

Neariy absenl <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)

Microtopography.

Score all present using 0 to 3 scaie.

Vegetated hummucks/tossucks

Coarse woody debris >1 Scm (Bin)

Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh

Ampiiibian breeding pools

Absent or comprises <Q.lha (0.2471- acresycontiauous area

Present and eittier comprises small part of weUand's

vegetation and is of modeiate qttality, rx comprises a

signHtoant part but Is of low quality ^ _

Present and eittier comprises significant partof wetiand's

vegetation and is of nradeiate quality or comprises a small

part and is of hiqh quality

Present artd comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's

v e ^ ^ f a m and is of high quatfty

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality

low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or

dlstuibanca toterant native species

Native spp are dominant component of ttie vegetation,

although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp

can also be present, and species cBversity moderate to

moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare

threatened or oTKianQefed spp

A predominance of native species, wiUt nonnative spp

and/or distort)ance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

the presence of rare, threatened, or endanqered SDP

6d.

T

til

Mudnat and Open Water Class Quality

0 1 2 3

Microtopoqraphv Cove

0 1

2

3

Absent <0.1 ha (0.247 acres)

LowO.l to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)


r Scale

Absent

Present very small amounts or if more common

of marginal quality

Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality



GRAND TOTAL(max 100 pts)

Reler to t ^ most recent ORAM Score C^brat ion Repon for th« scoHng breakpoint between weHand categories ^ tîe follawlng address: hlip://www.ep3.state.oh.us/(]5w/401/401 .html

lacT ra(/i«<xrl 1 r'Ahri<;3n/ "XXtW iim

http://www.ep3.state.oh.us/(%5d5w/401/401

jSite: /tfV^^j}^Jl |Rater(s): il iDate.'M-.v-o''? I

I \ I ( I Metric 1. Wettand Area (size). A(Lt'v0^0 6? pis sublotal

X

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <a3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha} (1 pt) <0.i acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

^!Ay^-o05

I ^ I M I Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. subtotal

1 \0 1 1

^

2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <:164ft) araund wetiand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around welland perimeter (1)

^ g V E R Y NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlffe area, ete. (7) LOW. Old fiekl (>10 ye^) ,^h«ub l^d , young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HlGH.(§esidentiaU'enced pasture, pask, consen/ation tillage, new fallow fiekl. (3) HIGH, Urtsan, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, constmction. (1)

max pts- subtotal

1

S

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Perennial surtace water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum water depth. Select one. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m (<:15.7in) (1)

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Betwe^ stream/take and other human use (1) Part of wettand/upiand (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2)

" ^

Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1) 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or dout>Ie check and average. None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

ditch I I point source (nonstonnwater) tite dike weir stomiwater input

Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Receni or no recovery (1) g filling/grading

road bed/RR track dredging otiier

f 1 I ISHI Metric 4- Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 plS- subtotal

1 \

4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat develc^ment Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average.

subtotal this page


ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating last revised 1 Febmary 2001 jim

^

^

Check all distorbances observed mowing I x

grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody det>ris removal toKk; pottutants s

shmb/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal secfimentation dredging famiing nutrient enrichment

ISite:

[IE subtotal Uiis paga

I " 1 ^ I

max 20pl$. sublotal

X

X

|Rater(s): {Date:

i \ ( \ \ lAJ'06^ ^

max 10 pts. $ubtc»at

1 ->l 1

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Check all that apply and score as indicated. Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetiand (5) Lake Erie coastal/ti'ibulary wetiand-unrestricted hydnstogy (10) Lake Erie coastal/tiibutary wetland-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wei Praires (10) Known occunence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Welland. See Question 5 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetldnd Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shmb Forest Mudflats Open water Other 6b. horizontal ^ lan view) Intersp^îon. Select only one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0) 6c. Covera9e of invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM long fomi for list. Add or deduct points kw coverage Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-26% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Vegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm {&n) standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Absent or comprises <Q.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and eittier comprises smalt part of wettand's 1 vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but Is of low quality Present and eittier comprises signifteant part of wetiand's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's 3 vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or bw disturbfflTce toterît native species Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, mod altiiough nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species cKversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp to A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp tugh and/or disturisance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water aass Quality 0 1 2 3

Absenl <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderale 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

I lU IGRAND TOTAMmax 100 pts)

Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very small amounts or if more comnrxin of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of Nghest quality or in small amounts of highest quality



v^rvniit «. it.v r ic iu ru t i n vituoiiuiauw rvatiiiy

Site: Rater(s): Date:

•

7^ j^{^)n/-S6lo ^l \ -s ,^0Ol

subtotal this page

r> IMetric 5. Special Wetlands. maxiQpts. sid»toiai Ctied(^J[that apply and scwe as indicaled.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested weUand (5) Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-re^ricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbad/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

X 45- Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20 pis. sutrtot^

•s

6a. Wettand Vegetation Communities. Score alt presenl using 0 to 3 scale.

/Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudflats Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Seiert onty one.

High (5) Moderately hi9hf4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2)

^ L o w ( l ) None (0)

Vegetation Community Cover Scale 0 1

2

3

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiauous area Present and either comprises small part of wefland's

vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of iow quatitv

Present and eitiier comprises significani part of weiland's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Description of VegetatiOTi Quali^ low

mod

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long fomi for list. Add or deduct points for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (O) Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scale.

Vegetated hummudts/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) Standing dead >25cm (I0in) dbh

high

Low ^ p diversi^ and/or predominance of nonnative or

disturi>ance toterant native species Native spp are dominant component of ttie vegetatk^n,

although nonnative and/or disturbance toterant native sjn^ can also be present, and species dix^rsity moderate to moderately high, but generaltyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native spedes, witii nonnative spp and/or distorbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp div^sity and often, but not always. the presence of rare, ihreatened. or endangered spp

J l lAmphibian breeding pools

Mudflat and Open Wafer Class Quality 0 1

2 3

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha {2.47 to 9.68 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Mfcrotopography Cover Scafe 0 1

2

3

/Vbsent Present very small amounts or if more common

of marginal quaiity Present in moderale amounts, but not of Nghest

quality or in small amounts of higher quality Present in moderate or greater amounts


GRAND TOTAMmax 100 pts)

Ftefer lo the most receni ORAM Score Calibration Report lor a e scoring brealqôims between welland categoi1e& al the lollowing address; htlp/fwww ep^state oh us/dswMOIMOI.hlml

vrrvnivi v. 9.u r i t ^ tu r i . / i i i i u tue i i i i i te iuw ixat i i i

Sitei Ml U\t'fv^^ Rater(s): M L Date: T - H " *

max 6 pts.

^ H

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <5D acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 lo <l0.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 tO <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pis)

^mj-on

max 14 pts.

lO- IC

Metric 2. Uptand buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Seled only one and assign score. Do not double ched<:.

WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164fl) or more arcHjnd wettand perimeler (7) MEDIUi^. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wettand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <26m (32ft to <82ft) around wettand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding larKl use. Setect one or doubfe checl< and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, witdlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>1D yeai^)jShrubland, young second growtii forest. (S) MOOERATELY HIGH. l^êrffiaT^nced pastore, parii, conservation tittage. new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, indusMat. o ^ pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. maxsopts- 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.

I^gh pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3)

2 Precipitation (1)

3c.

3e.

Seasonal/Intermittent suri'ace water (3) Perennial surface water (talte or stream) (5)

Maximum water depth. Setect only one and assign score >0,7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m {15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

2<0.4m(<15.7in)(1) Modifications to natural hydrotogic

None or none apparent (12)

3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score all tiiat apply. 100 year floot^lain (1) Between stream/lal<e and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), comptex (1)

> f Part of riparian or uptand conidor (1) (Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

Semi- to permanentiy inundated/satijrated (4) Regulariy inundated/saiurated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated h upper 30cm (12in) (1)

' < ' Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

1 ^ ^

regime . Score one or double check and i average.

Check all distorbances observed 1

1 ditch tile dike weir stomiwater input

5 B

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track j drecîng | otiier

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Devetopment. max 20 pts.

W^ 3

subtotal tfiis page

4a. Sub^rate disturbance. Soore one or double dieck and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3)

^ Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Setect onty one and assign score. Exceiieni (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor (1)

4c. Habitet alteration. Score one or double dieck and average.


1 Check all disturbances observed

W-F r

mowing grazing dearculting seledive cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

>

' i

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nulrieni enrichment

c T v m n V. a.u r i e i u r u i m b tuaut iw i i i vB n a i m i j

Mi AWjutJ Site: Rater(s): M L Date: 5"-/-(?'^

^

3 Y

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Seted one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2tia) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres {10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 lo <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12lia) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

f \ i f - \A)o^:i^

f^ftsWao'^

Metric 2. Uptand buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. 2a.

2D.

a /

Calculate average buffer width. Seled only one and assign score. Do not double dieck. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wettand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m io <50m (^2 to <164fit) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buflers average 10m to <:25m <32ft to <82ft) around wetiand perimeter (1)

"SSVERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wettand perimeter (0) Intensi^ of surrounding land use. Seted one or doubfe check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or oWer forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 yeai;^..^hrubland, young second growtti foresl. (5)

><j1 flODERATELY HIGH. ^smenU^ fenced pasiure, park, conservabon tillage, new faltow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, indusbial/dperr^ture, row cropping, mining, constnjction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pis! subttrtai "33. SouTces Of Water. Score all that apply.

^ High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3)

^ Predpitallon(l) 1 ? Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3)

Perennial surface water (lake or sêam) (5)

3b.

3d. 30-

36.

Maximum water deplh. Seted only one and assign score. g>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0,4 to 0.7m (15.7 lo 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or doubfe check

None or none apparent (12}

Connedivity. Score all that apfrfy. 100 year ffeodptain (1) Between stream/take and other human use (1)

.Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) > ^ Part of riparian or upland corridor (1) Duration inundatkin/saturaiion. Score one or ctt}) ctecft.

Semi- to permanenUy inundated/saturated (4) ^ ^ Regulariy irundated/saturated (3)

Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

Recovered (7) V Recovering (3)

Receni or no recovery (1)

n max 20 pts.

^ ] subtotal

and average.

Check all disturbances observed ^ ] ditch

tife dike

weir slormwater input

2« ^

point source (nonstormwater) lling/grading

road bed/RR track dredging other __

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development.

2

si^total litis page

4a- Substrate distintance. Score one or doi^le check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b- Habitat devetopment. Select only one and assign score. ExceHen!(7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor{l)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or doubte ctieck and average

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recwit or no recovery (1)

Check atl disturi)ances observed |

> .

..^

•5

mowing grazing clearcutting setective cutting woody debris removal toxic pottutants

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimenlation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

V. 0.V ritftu r u t i n uudi i i i ia i ivt : rvattittj


D l subtotal Ibis page

0 5^3 Metric 5. Special Wetiands. max 10 pts- subtotal Cfieck all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10)

Old growth foresl (10) Matore forested wetland (5) Lake Erie coastal/tributery wetfend-unrestrided hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetfend-restricted hydrotogy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relid Wet Praires (10)

Known occunrence state/federal threatened or endangered spedes (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitet or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Oualitetive Rating (-10)

3 a Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20 pts. sublolal

H

6a. Wetfend Vegetation Communittes Score atl present using 0 to 3 scale.

Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudfials Open water Olher

6b. horizontal (plariNnew) interspersion. Seled only one.

[High (5) ^ _ Moderately high(4) ___ Moderate (3)

Moderately low (2) ^ Low(1) ^ None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Tabte 1 ORAM long fomi for list. Add or dedud poinls for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) I earty absent <5% cover (0) Absenl (1)


2

3

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 aaes) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low quality

Present and either comprises significant p ^ of wetland's vegetetion and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quaBty

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's vegetation and is of high quatity


low

mod

h^h

Low spp di\«rsity and/or predominance of nonnative or distorbance loterani native spedes

Native spp are dominanl comptment of Uie vegetation, altiiough nonnative andfor distorbance toterant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately liigh, but generaltyw/o presence of rate tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native spedes, with nonnative spp and/or disturbance toterant naiive spp absent or virtoally absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, tile presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp


G Vegeteted hummucks/tussucks ^ Coarse woody debris >15cm (Oin) a Standing dead >26cm (IOin) dbh ^ Amphibian breeding pools

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality 0 1 2 3

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale

^ ^

Absent PresKil very smalt amounts or if more common

of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest

quaiity or in small amounts of highest quatity

Presem in moderate or greater amounts and of highest quality


• to Bia most recanl ORAM Score Calibration Report tor the scoring breakpoints between wetland categories at the lollowing address: tirip «Www.epa.slate.oh.us/dsw«01«01.blml

http://Www.epa.slate.oh.us/dsw�01�01.blml

ISite: lAÛ].iU |Rater(s): ~;;a' I Date: ^^h^n I

I o , I ^ "1 Metric 1. Wetland Area (size).

•

3

ftC+'VjOO^ subtotal

Z

m"

(^(v^W'0<?'

max 14 pts. sLtblotal

S

K

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 lo <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <:l.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select onfy one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m lo <25m {32ft lo <:S2ft) around weMand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older foresl, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrubland, young second growOn torest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, parit, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, rctw cropping, mining, construction. (1)

I 1 ^ I ^ 0 ^ 1 Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pts. sublotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3)

^ 2 Predpitetion (1) Têasonal/lntermittent surface water (3)

Perwiniai surface water (take or slream) (5) 3c. Maximum virater depth. Select one. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

3b. Connectivity. Score sdl that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. torest), complex (1)

^

^ ^ P a r t of riparian or upland corridor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbi check. Semi- to pennanentiy inundated/saiurated (4)

^

' V Regulariy inundated/satorated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

^ ^ d i t c h I Ipoint source (nonstormwater) ' ' ^ ^ t i l e

dike weir stormwater input

Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

2 < filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging

I \ \ I ^ ^ I Metric 4- Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. sut>iotal

^

4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

> C Moderately good (4) ' ^ F a i r (3)

Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) P g Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

1

subtotal this page ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

:2s:

Check all disturbances observed mowing

grazing clearcutting

"X* selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutents

shmb/sapling removed herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

ISite: |Rater(s): I Date:

EH sublotBt this page

CHS

^fmlÔO^ I o j ^ H I Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max lOpis. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growtii forest (10) Mature forested wetiand (5) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetiand-unresttlcted liydrology (10) Lake Erie coastel/tributery wetiand-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Known occun-ence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitel or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 5 Qualifative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communit ies. Vegetation Community Cover Scaie max 20pls. subtest

2 i

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shnib Forest Mudflate Open water Other

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and eittier comprises small part of wetland's 1 vegetetion and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but Is of low quality Present and eitiier comprises significant part of wetiand's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Selecl only one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3)

><1 Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0) 6G. Coverage of invasive p l ^ t s . Refer Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduct points for coverage Exten^ve >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) &d. IMicrotopography. Score all presenl using 0 to 3 scale. Vegeteted hummucks/lussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6tn) Stending dead >25cm (10in) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of vratland's 3 vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or tow distorbance lolerant native species Native spp are dominant component of the vegetetion, mod altiiough nonnative and/or distuitiîce tolânt native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generaltyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp to

A predominance of native species, with nonnattve spp high and/or distori3ance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always. tiie presence of rare, threatwied, or endangered spp

u 0

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quaiity /Mjsent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) LowO.l to <1ha (0.247 to2.47acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

I i^tj IGRAND TOTAL(max 100 pts)


Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Prênl very smal! amounis or if more common of marginal quality „ _ _ _ _ ^ Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality



wr\^^nt v, o.v r i a u r u i i i i v.(u«)ii i iu)uv« rvdi t i iy

(^.J^liW^ Site: Rater(s): fVl L (Date: S' M '

^ ^ ^ H a x £ pis.

^

1 1


>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2iia) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pls) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

%l^ -w o\ o

s i^[)J-oo^

max 14 pts.

\ ^ 7^

IVIetric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. EDo not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wettand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164fl) around wetiand perimeter (4)

^NARROW. Buffers average 10m to •=25m (32lt lo <82fl) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2h. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select tme or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, witdlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field {>10 years), shnjbland, young second growtti forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. ^SlSentiaTlfenced pastore, paric, consen/ation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Uriaan, industi ialTSpBrrpagluie, row cropping, minbig, construction. (1)

max SQ pis

^XZ

Metric 3. Hydrology. sutitotai 3a. Sources of Water. Sa)re all that apply. 3b.

High pH groundwater (5) Otiier groundwater (3)

•><- Precipitation (1) Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Perennial surfece water (lake or stream) (5) 3d.

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

I JC <0.4m (<15.7in) (1) i i s j c a ^ y . . 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Srore one rx doifele check and average.

None or none apparent (12) ' X J Recovered (7)

Recovering (3) Receni or no recovery (1)

Connectivity. Score alt that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/take and other human use (1)

_Part of wettand/upiand (e.g. forest), complex (1) >• Part of riparian or uptand conidor (1)

Duratton inundation/saturation. Score <ê or 6i)t chedc. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

- ^ Regulariy inundated/saiurated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

W' ' ^ h

\ Check alt distort)ances observed

-

\ \ ^

ditch tile dike weir stormwater input

^ ^

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. 4a. Subsâte disturbance. Score one or double check and average,

one or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Receni or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Setet^ onty one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(l)

4c. Habitet alteration. Score one or double check and average

^ S

.None or none apparent (9) ' 2 Recovered (6)

Recovering (3) Reoeru or no recovery (1)

subtotal this page

CheOt alt disturioances Observed |

^

i;4

mowing grazing clearcutting setective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutents

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrictimenl

u r v m n v. o .u r t t ^ iu r u i i i l w u a i i u u i t i v e r \a i i i f y


in-5 dtKfÔII fix

D

pag

T> 5 max 10 pis.

IV <A\^ 20 pts.

^ ' S

pi^v^/- 00 Metric 5. Special Wetlands Chedt all tiiat apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Matore forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastel/tributary wetiand-unrestricted hydrotogy (10) Lake Erie coastel/tributary wetiand-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) RetictWet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federat threatened or endangered species (10) Significani migratory songbird/water fowl habitet or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitetive Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetiand Vegetation Communities. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

Aquaiic bed h Emergent

_ 2 Shmb ^ Forest

Mudflats Open water Olher_

6b. fiorizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one.

High (5) Moderately fvgh(4)

5 < Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Law(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Reter to Tabte 1 ORAM long form lor list. Add or deduci pdnls for coverage

Extensive >7S% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Nearly absenl <5% cover (0)

X Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scê.

(^ Vegeteted hummucks/tossucks A- Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) 1 Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbti (\ Amphibian breeding pools

Vegetation Community) 0 1

2

3

Cover Scate Absent or comprises <0.1 ha (0.2471 aaes) contiguous area Present and either comprises smafl part of wetland's

vegetetion and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of tow quaiity

Present and eilher comprises signiftcant part of wefland's vegetation and is of moderate quality OT comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wefland's vegetetion and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quaiity

(ow

mod

high

Low app diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or distorbance toterant native spedes

Native spp are dominant component of toe vegetation, altiiough ncmnative and/or disturbance tc^rant native spp can also t>e present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare Itireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native spedes, with nonnative spp and/or distorbance tolerant native spp absait or \nrtualty absent, and liigh spp diversity and often, but not atways, tiie twesence of rare, tiireatened. or endangered spp


Microtopography

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Cover Scale 0 1

2

3

Absent Present very smalt amounts or If more common

of marginal quality Present in moderate amounte, but nol of highest

quality or in small amounts of highest quatity Present in moderate or greater amounts

and of highest qualily


Reler to me most recent ORAM Score Calibraiion Report for tne scoring breakpoints between weU«md categories at the following address: tiitpy/www.epa.state,on,us/dsw/40l/4or html

http://www.epa.state,on,us/dsw/40l/4or

\./rv/M*i V. 9.U riesiu r u i i i i t , {ua i i ( i tauve (\aLiity

Site: M I W J W A Rater(s): /^L bate: 5 ' - l ^

a a »x 6 pts. sutitotal

max 14 pts.

max 30 pts.

Ti ly max 2D pis.

3 ^


>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 lo <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 lo <25 acres (4 to <:10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pls) 0.1 fo <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0,1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

iMt'ôW

s

l^fh^pl' 6 \ o

1^ 31

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use, 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Setect only one and assign score. Do not doubfe check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetiand perimeter (7) IwlEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetiand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average IQm to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around weUand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growtii or oWer forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7) LOW. OW field (>10 yeare}^shrubland, young second growtii foresl. (5)

^^MODERATELY HIGH. (gSentialTjjnced pasture, park, consen/ation tiltege, new fallow fieW. (3) HIGH. Urban, industoalT^pen^Kisttire, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

IS 2b.

Metric 3. Hydroiogy. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score alt that apply.


^ Precipilation (1) X Seasonat/tntemiittent surtece water (3)

Pererviiat surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score

>0.7(27.6in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27,6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic


3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between streamHake and other human use (l) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

2

\ f Part ofriparian or uptand corridor (1) Duration trutndatfon/saturatton. Scaê one ordW check.

Semi- to permanentiy inundated/saturated (4) ^ Regulariy inundated/satorated (3)

Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally satorated in upper 30cm (I2in) (1)

y Recovered (7) 3 ^ Recovering (3)

Recent or no recovery (1)

regime

1 Che . Score one or doubte chedt and average.

ck all disturbances obsen^d 'ditch tite dike weir stomiwater input

i _ j ^ ^ ^ ~ _

point source (nonstonnwater) lilting/grading road bed/RR track dredging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a.

4b.

4c.

Sut)5trate disturbance. Score one or doubte check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

Habitat development. Select or^y one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4)

^ F a i r ( 3 ) Poor to fair (2) Poor (1)

Habitet alteration. Score one or doubte ctteck and average.

' ^ >

: ^

subKrial t ^ page


Che

r

M

:;k all disturbances observed mowing igrazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal loxic pollutents

shmb/sapting removal herijaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging fanning nutrient enrichment

u n m « w. 9.V r n j i u r u i i i i UUdi i i i ic i t iVB rva i i i i y


V? subtotal this page

0 V5 (inwAtoô

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pis. subtotal

max 20 pts.

-^'i

5 3<f

Check atl that apply and score as indicated. Bog (10) Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetiand (5)

Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrotogy (10) Lake Erie coastat/tributary wettend-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/Water fowl habitet or usage (10) Category 1 Welland. See Question 1 Qualitetive Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

^

6a. Wettand Vegetation Communities. Score ail present using 0 lo 3 scale.

Aquatic bed Emergent ShhJb Forest Mudflats Open water Otiier _

Vegetation Community Cover Scale

6b. horizontel (plan view) Inlersperston. Select only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately tow (2)

12 Low (1) ^ | N o n e (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduci points for coverage

Extensive >76% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3)

5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score alt present using 0 to 3 scale.

Absenl or comprises <0.1ha (02471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetiand's

vegetation and is of moderate quatity. or oomprises a significant part but is of tow quality

Present and eilher comprises significant part of wetiand's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's vegetation and is of high quality

Nan^hre Descriptton of Vegetatton Quality low

mod

high

1-Ow spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or distoriiance tolerant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetetion, although nonnative and/or distorbance toterant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generatlyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species, witii nonnative spp and/or distorbance toterarit native spp absent or virtoally absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, tiireatened, or endanqered spp

Vegeteted hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality D 1

2 3 '^

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scate 0 1

2

3

Absent fêsem very small amounts or if more common

of marqinal quatity Present hi moderate amounts, bul not of highest

quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality Present in moderate or greater amounte

and of highesi quality


Refer lo the most recent ORAM Score Calibration Report for the scoring breakpoints beiween wetland categories at »ie folloirirg address: http:/Aftww,epa.siaie.oti.us/dswMOlHOl html

v r v ^ m V. 3.W r i B i u r u i i i i VriUctllUUtlivt^ rSdUiiy

i(V\,M%IMA Rater(s): / V ) ^ L v . m ^ Site: bate: -C-/ -(T^

^ ^ ^ • n a x pts.

^

' (0.


]>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pis) ^ 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) " 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1tia) (4 pts)

2 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 lo <3 acres (0,12 to <1.2ha) (2pts)

" 0,1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0.12ha) (1 pt) " <0.1 acres {0.04ha) (0 pts)

R-t-wO^V

(^PAW'OÎ

Metric 2. Uptand buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. subtotal 2a.

2b.

Calculate average buffer widtii WIDE

Select only one and assign score. [)o not double check. Bufters average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7)

n a

y MEDIUM. Bufl'ers average 25m to <5Qm (82 to <:164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <32fl) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

Intensify of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older torest. prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

2 LOW. OW field (>10 yeare), shrutând, young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pastore. parit, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Uri an, industrial, open pasiure, row ao|:îng, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pts. 3a.

3c.

3e.

Sources of Water. Score att tiiat apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwat^ (3)

> d Precipitation (1) X Seasonal/Intermittent surtace water (3)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) Maximum water depth. Setect onty one and assign score

?0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 lo 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) «:Q.4m(<15.7in)(1)

odifications to natural hydrologic

_ None or none apparent (12) y Recovered (7)

Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score aH lhat apply. 100 year fioodptain (1) Beiween sbeam/iake and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part ofriparian or uptand conidor (1)

5^

Duration inundation/saluraljc»i. Score one or dt^ check. Semi- to pemianenUy inundated/saiurated (4) Regulariy inundated/satorated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (I2in) (1)

"5?

1 ^ I f ^

regime

Che

. Score one or doubte check and averaqe.

ck all disturbances obsen/ed 'ditch tHe dike weir stormwater input

^

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging otiier

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one ordoubte check and average.

None or none apparent (4) ^ Fiecovered (3)


4b. Habitat development. Select onty one and assign score. n Excellent (7) " Very good (6) " Good (5)

^ Moderately good (4) _ Fair (3) " Poor to fair (2) " Poor(1)

4c. Habitet alteration. Score one or double check and average.

t one or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

M l subtotal this page

1 Check all disturbances observed

_

\z^

' 1

mowing grazing clearcutting setective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutenls

1 1

X

1—1

^rub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentetion dredging fanning nutrienl enrichmenl

v>rv> ivi V. a.<j r ie iu 1-1.11111 wuaiiiiuitive ruiiiiijj

Site: Rater($): Date:

•« '5 -sublotal this page

6 V I Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10)


Lake Erie coastelAributary wetland-unrestocted hydrcôgy (10) Lake Erie coastel/tributary welland-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occunence stete/federal tiireatened or endangered species (10) Significam migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wettand. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

3 max20pts-

5^3- Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Score all present using 0 to 3 scale.

Aquatic bed Emergent Shmb

O, forest Mudflats Open water

Other__

6b. horizrmtal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one.

High (5) IWoderateiy h^h(4) Moderate (3)

•< Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plante. Refer to Tabte 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduct points for coverage

_^_ Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderale 25-75% cover (-3)

Y Sparse 6-25% cover (-1) __ Neariy absent <6% cover (0) ~]/\bsent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score all present using o to 3 scaie.

^Vegetated hummucks/lussucks

^Coarse woody debris >15cm (6ln) I Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh

j jAmphib ian breeding pools

Vegetetion Communitv 0 1

2

3

Cover Scate Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises smaN part of wetiand's

vegetetion and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low quafity

Present and eilher comprises significant part of wettand's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's vegetetion and is of high quatity

Narrative Descriptton of Vegetation Quality low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or disfuri[>ance tolerant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, although nonnative and/or disturijance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, bul generatlyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species. wiUi nonnative spp and/or dIstoriDance toterant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversily and often, but not always, tiie presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality

Absent -gQ-Iha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <lha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.8S acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

5>

Microtopogrephy Cover Scate 0 1

2

3

Absent Present very small amounts or If more common

of marqinal quatity Present in moderate amounts, bul not of highest

quality or in small amounts of highest quatitv Present in moderate or greater amounts

and of tiighest quaiity


Refer to the most recent ORAIi,! Score Calibraiion Report for (he scoring breakpoints beiween weSand categories at the foaowmg address: htBi://www epa state ohus/dswrtOlHOI .html

v/r\>M«i V. o.v r t v n j r u t i n u u d i i t i u i u v t ; rvoimi i

Isite: ifWiMltf iJA Rater(s): / V l ^ L J A ^ jPate: ^ - I - Q I

0-^ ^ ^ ^ k a x

?? Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). m- ^ '

^ 11

subtoiat Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 26 IQ <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25acres(4to<101ha)(4pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to ^1.2ha) (2pls) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <(J.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04113) (0 pts)

f^fAW-00

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. 2a.

2b.

S

n 9

Calculate average buffer wkjfh. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE, Suffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetiand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wettand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m ID <25m (32fl to <S2ft} around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m <<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. VERY LOW 2nd growth or older forest prairie, savannah. witcUife area. elc. (7)

3 ^ 0 W . Old fteld (>10 years), shrubland. young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Resktential. fenced pasiure, park, conservaticm tillage, new faltow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pis

2<

3a. Sources of Waler. Score atl that apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/intermiitent surtace water (3) Perer\ni3l surface water (lake or stream) (5)

3c. Maximum water deptti. Select only one and assign score. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

°>?l<0.4m(<15.7in)(1) 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic

3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and otiier human use (1) Part of wettand/upiand {e.g. foresO- complex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundatton/satiKatton. Score one or dbl check. Semi- lo permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturaled (3) Seasonally inuntjated (2) SeasonaHy saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

5 ^

^

.None or none apparent (12) y Recovered (7)


r> <'3~

regime . Score one or doubfe check and average

Cfieck alt disturbances obsen/ed i

"S

y

(Jitch lite dike

weir

stormwaler input

^

poinl source (nonstormwater)

fitting/grading road bed/RR track

dredging

other

max 20 pts.

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or doubte check and average.

None or none apparent (4) y ^ Recovered (3)


4b. Habitat devetopment. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Hôderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to teir (2) Poor(1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or doubte check and average.

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent orno recovery (1)

m subiotai l ' i 'Spage

Check all disturbances obsen/ed

S:

mowing grazing clearcutting

selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

X

^rub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging terming nulrient enrichment

w n m i i V. o.v r i d u ri . f i i i i %<(uciiuiuiuw r\oii i iy

Site: Rater(sV. Date:

'^'5^ sublotal Ihis page

6 ' ^ 1 Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pt& subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated-

Bog (10) Fen (10)


Lake Erie coastalAributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coaslal/tributary wetland-restricled hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10} Significant migratory songbird/waterfowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Qualitalive Rating (-10)

9 ^ ^ Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopograpliy. max 20 pis. Wetland Vegetation Communities.

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub


^ Foresl Mudflats Open water Other

horizontel (plan view) Interspersion. Selecl only one.

High (5) Moderately higti(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants, Refer to Table 1 ORAM tong form for list. Add or deduct points for coverage


Y Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)

6d. Microlopography. Score atl present using 0 lo 3 scate.

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh

^ Amphibian breeding pools

0

1

2

3

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) conliguous area

Present and either comprises smalt part of wetiand's

vegetation and is of moderate quatity, or comprises a

significant pari but is of low quality

Present and erther compnses signiticant part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quatily or comprises a small

part and is of high quatitv

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's

vegetetion and is of high qu^lly

Nan-arive Description of Vegetetion Quality

low

mod

high


disturt)ance tolerant naiive species

Native spp are duminant component of tiie vegetation,


can also be present, and species diversity moderate to

moderately high, but generatlyw/o presence of rare

threatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp

and/or dislurbance toterant native spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always.

the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

eatlp

ffi;


0

1

2

3

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1 ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)


Hiqh 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scate

5y

0 1

2

3

Absent

Presenl very small amounts or if more common

of marginal quality

Present in moderate amounis, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality


andof hiqhesl quality


Reler to ihe mosL feceni ORAM Score Calibraiion Repon for Ihe scoring breaKpoinis between welMntl categories al Ihe following address imp /- www epa slale oh iis/dswMOlMOl hlml

•L>r\Mwi V. 9.V rtviM ru i i i i idiUciiiiiMiiw r>auMtj

îUV(M(!i /Vl^ U J i Site: Rater(s): [Date: ^ - j - O ^

zy ^ ^ H h a x 6

^

^ I i;x

M e t r i d . Wetland Area (size) Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) {5 pts) 10 \o <25 acres (4 to <1Q.1ha) (A pte) 3 to <10 acres ( 1 1 to <4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 lo <1.2ha) {2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0.12ha) (1 pO <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

fl U- - vOON

z (^(>AW'C}\

tVletric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts 2a.

2b.

o \n

Calculate average buffer width. Selecl onty one and assign score. Do nol doubte ctieck. WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeler (7)

2 IÊDIUM. Buffers average 25m lo - SOm (82 to <164fl) around wettand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around welland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <lOm (<32ft) around wetland perimeler (0)

tniensity of surrounding land use. Selecl one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

2 LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residenlial. fenced pasture, parit, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construclion. (1)

max 30 pts.

^

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score att that apply. 3b

High pH graurtdwater (5) Olher groundwater (3)

> d Precipitation (1) 2 5 Seasonai/imermittent surtace water (3)

Perennial surtece water (lake or stream) (5) Maximum water deptii. Setect only one and assign score.

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m (-=15.710) (1)

odifications to natural hydrotogic regime. Score one or double check arid average.

3c

Connectivity. Score ail ttiat apply. IOQ year floodplain (1) Between stream/take and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

^ X Part of riparian or uptand corridor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbt check.

Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in} (1)

^

3e

2 None ornone apparent (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

1 ^ ^

Check all disturbances observed "Vfaitch

tile dike weir

stormwater input

^

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed^R track

dredging

other

rnax 20 pis

4b

sublotal iivs page

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development 4a. Substrate dislurtjance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4) V ; Recovered (3)


Habitat development. Select onty one and assign score. Exceltent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

X Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1)

4c. Habitet alteration. Score one or double check and average.



::2<

mowing gra2ing clearcutting setective cutling woody debris removal toxic pollutants

. 1

X

shrub/sapling removal heri?aceous/aquatic bed removaJ sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

v/r\Min V. o.v n c i u r u l i i i wueiMiiiauvc r\c)Liii\j

Site: Rater(s): Dat^:

* ' ^ pap'

' 1 ( 1 . NIetric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 Pts subtoi Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested weitand (5) Lake Erie coaslal/tributary wetland-unreslricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coaslal/tributary wetland-reslricted hydroksgy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Knomi occurrence slate/federal Itveatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/waterfowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand, See Question 1 Qualitalive Rating (-10)

a ? ^ Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopograpliy. max 20 pts. 6a. Wetiand Vegetation Communities.

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub FOTest Mudfials Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan view} Interspersion. Setect only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderale (3) Moderalely low (2) Low(l) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduct points for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Nearty absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)


KVegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6inJ Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Vegetetion Community Caver Scate

0

1

2

3

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Presenl and eilher comprises small part of wetiand's

vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a

significant part but is of low quality

Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderale quality or comprises a small

part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's

veget^kjn and is of hkjh quality

Narrative Description of Vegetetion Quality

low

mod

X

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or disturbance tolerant native spedes

Native spp are dominant componenl of ttie vegetalbn, although nonnative and/or disturbance toterant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generatlyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp _____

A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp and/or disturbance tiMerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and otien, but nol atways, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

5>

n/ludflat and Open Water Class Quatity

0

1

2

3


Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)


Higt\ 4ha (9.88 acres) or more


0

1

2

3

Absent

Present very smalt amounts or if more common

of marginal quality

Present in moderate amounts, but not of higtiest quality or in small amounts of highest quaiity




Relulcttê most recent ORAM Score Calibration Report lor Ihe sconng breakpoinls beiween wetland caiegones stine lollowing address tiiip*/wvm epa state ohus/flswMQlMOl html

ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating l,\W-voO\S

Isite: MiAi[1t0J Rater(s): yU L. Date: 5-1-01

^ 3 max 6 pl&

S S

^(«\W'01 ^

^3 3i


__ >50 acres (>20 2ha) (6 pts) [ 25 to <50 acres {10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) ' 10to<25acres(4lo<10,1ha)(4pts) [ 3 to <10 acres (1 2 to <4ha) (3 pis) \ 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1,2ha) (2pts) [o.Uo<Q3acres(0.04 to<0 12ha)(1 pt) ' <Q.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pis]

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use, 23. Calculate average buffer wkith. Select oniy one and assign score Oo not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM- Buffers average 25m lo <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4}

^ NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wettand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers averse <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

3b- Intensity of surrounding land use Select one or doubte ched^ and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older foresl. prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7) ^ C LOW Old fteld (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth foresl. (5) \ ; MODERATELY HIOH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservatkm tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HIGH, Urt)an. industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

max 30 pts-

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Olher groufHiwater (3) Precipitatkin(l)

3d. 3c.

3e.

V Seasonal/Intermittent sur^ce waler (3) y Perenniat surface water (take or slream) (5)

Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score |>0.7(27.6in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

"Sr <Q,4m(<t5,7in)(1} lulodilications lo natural hydrotogic regime. Score one or doubte check and average

None or none apparent (12] Recovered (7) RecovCTng (3) Recall or no recovery {\]

3b. Connectivity. Score ail tlial apply. • ^ 100 year floodplam (1)

Between streamflake and other human use (1) Part of wetland/upland (eg. forest), complex { i ) Part of riparian or upland corndor [ 1)

2 ^ jr Duration inundafion/saturation, Soore one or (to! check.

Semi- to permanenlly inundated/saturated (4) Regularly inundated/saturated (3)

' V ^ SeascMially inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (I2in){l)

^.5- ^V '5

Check ail disturt>ances observed ditch tile dike

weir

stormwaler input

point source {nonstormwater) ^filling/grading

^ ^ road bai/RR fe-ack

dredging . , i ^ o J h e r C h i ^ p J s v i f T ^ ^

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development max 20 pis. suMoial 4 a .

4b.

4c.

Substrate dislurtjance. Score one or doubte cêck and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Receni or no recovery (1)

Habilal develc^ment. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

3 ? Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor (1)

Habitat alteralion. Score one or doubte check and average.

i^.b wbtoial «MS page

None or oor e apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3 J Recent or no recovery (1)

1 Check a/f cfistufbances crfjssrved |

: i ^

y

mowing grazing clearcutting $eteclive cuuing woody debris removal toxic pollutants

^ m m m t

shrub/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

last revised 1 February 2001 /jm

ORAM V. SO Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: |Rater(s): Date:

m Si/blolai thi& page

0 mo Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max topts sublolal CtiQC^ sti that apply ar d score as indicated

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (S)

Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetiand-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastatAributa^ wetland-reslricted hydrology (5)


Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10}

Significant migratory songbird/Waler fowl habltal rx usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Ratkig (-10)

} 0 <^>Z> Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. m&x20pi5 &a. Welland Vegetation Communities

Score alt present using 0 to 3 scale.

Aquatic t>ed

Emergent

S^ Shmb

Forest

Mudflats

Open water

Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion.

Setecl only one.

High (5)

Moderately hi9h(4)

Moderate (3)

Moderately low (2)

Low(l}

None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer

to Tabte 1 ORAM king form for lisl. Add

or deduct points for coverage

Extensive >7$% cover (-5)


Sparse 5-25% covw (-1)

Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)

Vegetation Communitv

0

1

2

3

Cover Scate

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiouous area

Present and either comprises smalt part of wetiand's

vegetation and is of moderate qu^rty. or comprises a

significant part bul is of low quality

Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small

part and is of high qualitv

Present and comprises significani part, or more, of vrettand's

vegefalion and is of high quaiity

^

Nan-alive Description of Vegetation Qualily

bw

mod

high


distuibanoe tolerant naiive speaes Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,


can also b& present, and species diversity moderate lo

moderately high, but generatfyw/o presence of rare

threatened or endanqered spp

A predominance of native species, with nonnative $r^

andtor dislurbance toterant native spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not atways.


6d. Microlopography.

Score all present using 0 lo 3 scale.

Vegelated hummucks/tussucks

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)


Amphibian breeding pools

545


0

1

2

3

Absent <0,lha (0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 lo 2.47 acres)

Moderale 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.B8 acres}

High 4ha (9.6S acres) or more

IWicrotopographv Cover Scate 0 1

2

3

Absent Present very small amounts or if more common

of marginal quality

Preser\t In moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highesi qualily




Refer (a the mosi feceni ORAM Score Calibraiion Report for {he sconng breakpoinls between tvelland G9ieQ0ii«s al the Follounng address hllp:/<vAw^,epa.stale cA us/dsw/401M01 hlml

last revised 1 February 2001 jim

le: jA ^Mt Ui Rater(s): i ^ LJ%i ^^ iDate: 5 5" "

0 0 âxSptG. subtolal

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Ofi\]iO'-d\1 H f " ^ ^ ^

^ 13

Selectone size class and assign score >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <2D.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pls)

K0.12ha) (1 pt) ipts)

_.. 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1 " [ 0 . 1 to <0,3 acres (0.04 lo V J O - I acres (0.04ha) (0 pts

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 ^ t . subtcrtal 2a .

2b.

11 1

Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and a s ^ n score. Do not double chectc. WlOE. Buffers average SOm (164fl) or more around wetland perfmefeer (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m lo<25m {32ft to <82ft) around wetiand perimeter (1)

^ VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around welland perimeter (0)

Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or dotd)le check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older foiest prairie, savannah. witdlHe area, etc. (7) LOW. Otd field {>10 years), shrubland. young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new faUow fieW. (3) HtGH. Urban, irKfusdial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

max30p& subtotal

•

Metrics. Hydrology. 3a. Smircas of Water. Score sUt ttiat ^3 f^ .

High pH groundwaier (5) Other groundwater (3) Precipitation (1) Seasonal/lntennttlent surface water (3) Perennial surface water (take or stream) (5)

3c. Maxtafwan water deptti. Select o i % one and assign score >0.7 (27.6in) <3) 0.4 to 0.7ffl (15.7 lo 27.6ln) (2) •=0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

3e

3b. ^nnectlvi ty. Score all Uut apply. 100 year floodplain <1) Between stream/lake and otiier ftuman use (1) Part of wetland/uptand {e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or up4v^ contdor (1)

3d. Duration inundalion/saluratton. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanentty Inundated/saturated (4)

X ^ Regiiarty inundated/saturated (3) _ Seasonally imindated (2)

_ ^ Seasonatty saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1) ifications to n ^ ^ l hydrotogic regime. Score one or doiAte check and avsiage.

None or none apparent (12) | Check all disturbances observed Recovered (7)

X iRecover ing (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

^ \ ^

ditch tile dike

war

stormwater input

point source (nonstormvrater) 2 filling/grading " X road bed/RR track

dredging

ottier

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pis.

Jfebit

Substrate <tisturbance. Score one or dout)le check and average. None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat devetopment. S ^ c t only one and assign score. • Exceltenl (7)

Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor( l )

Habitat alteration. Score wie or doutê check and average. 4c.

n s

sublolal inis page


Check ail disturbances observed mowing grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants


lacl raii\c£iH i C ^ K n i a m O n m iim

Site: Rater(s): IPate:

z

0 sutitotai this page

n max 10 pts.

L^ \ ^ max 20 pts.

IA

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Chedc allthat apply and score as indicated

I^BogOO) Fen (10)

Otd growth fbrest (10)

Mature forested wettand (5)

take Erie coastal/bttHitary wettand-unreslrteted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetland-restffctad liydiok}gy (5)

^ L a k e Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relet Wet Praires (10)

aKncMKi occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbirdAMater fof#A habitat or usage <10>

Category 1 Wettand. See Question 1 Qualitative Rattng (-10)

t-

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography, 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities.

Scope all present using 0 to. 3 scale.

Aquatk: bed

h Emergent

Shmb

Fewest

Mudflats

Opa i water

Ottier

6b. hrxizontal (plan view) lntersp»sk>n.

Select only one.

High (5)

Moderately high(4)

Moderate (3)

Moderately tow (2)

Low(1)

" ^ None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plante. Refer

to Table 1 ORAM k>ng form for list. Add

or deduct potnis fw coverage

^ Extensive >75% cover (-5)

_ Moderate 25-75% cover (-3)


___ Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

> ^ Absent (1)

6d. Microtopograpliy.


0 Vegetated hummucks/tussucks

ft Coarse woody debris >15cm (6*in)

© Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh

U Amphibian t^reeding pools

Vegetation ConrnHinHy Cover Scale

. . 0 -

1

2

3

Absent or comprfses <0.1ha (0.2471 ac»5)'conttguous area

Prasent and etther comprises smaH pai l of wettand^

vegetatton and Is of nraderate qualily, or comprises a

significant part but is of tow quality

Prasent and ^ttter comprises signifteant part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderatfi qualty or comprises a smaH

i part and is of mgh ouatitv

IPresertf and comprises significant part, or moi«. of wettand's

vegetation and ts of high qualitv

Narrative Description of Veaetation Quality

low

mod

high

disturt>ance tolerant nattve species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

atttiough nonnative and/or cUsturbance tolerant nattve spp

can also be present, and species cHversHy moderate to

moderately high, but generallyw/b presence of rare

ttireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of nattve spectes, vidtti nonnattve spp

and/br disturbance toterant nattve spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but rtot always,


e



Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)



Microtopoqrephv Cover Scate

0 1

2

3

Absent

Present very smaii amounts or if more common

of marginal qua^tv

Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest qualily ot in small amounts of behest quality




Refer to His most recent ORAM Score CaStvaiion Report for ma sccrbig t]reakpolnts tjelwsen wetiand categories at Ihe foAowing 3<k}ress: httpi/wwu(.epa.state.oh.us/dsw(4QlM<11 JtHnl

\a<a rau'iKO/i 1 PAhni^ in/ 90/11 i im

m ^\AJ^*7 ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Wid^^ /^ iZTT^ Site: RaterCs): IÂM [Date: f - J - o n

^ ^ max S pl^'

M 5

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Select cffie size class and assign score.

>60 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts] 25 to - 50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts} 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

5 ? 0 3 lo <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 lo <0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.i acres {0.04ha) (0 pts)

, |t/^W-0(^

max 14 pis.

(< ^ 1

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average bufler wdlh. Select only one and assign score. Do not double chedt.

WIDE. Buffers average SOm (lB4ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) HflEDlUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <1B4ft) around wetland perimeter ( l) NARROW. Buffers ava^ge tOm to <25m (32fl to <32fl) around wetland perimeter (1)

^ 3 ^ R ' ^ NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wettand perimeter (0) 2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select c»ie or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, sav^nah, witdlife area. etc. (7) J-0\N. Old field (>10 yeareL^mjbland, young secx>nd growth forest. (5)

" V M O D E R A T E L Y HIGH. ^ 5 B ^ 5 fenced pasture, parte, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, cpen pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. (nax 30 pis. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.


3c.

3e.

5 Z Precipitation (1) "St •Seasonai/lntBrmittenI surface water (3)

' ^ ""Perermial surface water (take or stream) (5) Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score

>0,7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

3b

3d,

Conr>ecttvily. Score alt that apply. 100 year floodfriain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

.Part of wetland/upland {e.g. forest], complex (1) j P Part of riparian or inland corridor (1) Duration inundation/saluraUon. Soore one or dbl chetdt.

Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saluraled (3)

S^<0.4m(<15.7in)(1) Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one ordoubte

^ Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (I2)n) (1)

ched< and average.

rocii)jfXi h%hj^

None or none EqDparent (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Receni or no recovery (1)

O 33

Check all disturbances observed ><r ditch

tile dike

weir

storniwaier input

^ "

point source (nonstormwater) filling/gradhg oad bed/RR xtack

dredging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development max ao pis sublets 4a. Sub^rate disturbance. Score one or double ched( and average.

^ ^ None ra- none apparent (4) Sj^ Recovered (3)

_ Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat devetopment. Sdect only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderalely good (4)

2|Fa"M3) Poor to fair (2) PoQr(1)

4a Habitat atteralkm. Score one or double check and average

^ ^

1 subuiBl Ihis p ^ e

None or none apparent (9) Recowsned (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no t^covery (1)

Check all disturbancee observed | mowing grazing cleaTCutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

shnjb/teapling removal 1 herbaceous/aqualic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment 1

lasl revised 1 February 2001 jjm

ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating


il st^toiai ih's page

0 IZ> Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pis subtolal Check alt thai apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old grovrth forest (10)

tâture forested M^land (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tribulary wefland-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-reslricted hydrotogy (5)

t^ke Plain Sand Prairies (Oal<: Openings) (10)

RelictWet Praires(10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered êctes (10)

Significant migratory songbkrt/v/ater fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 v^ttand. See Question 1 Qualitative RaSng (-10)

-> I JO IMetric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography max 20 pts Wetland Vegetation Communities.


Aquatic bed

Emergent

Shmb

^ ^ Forest

Mudllals

Open water

Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) interspersion.

Select only one.

_ High (5)

^ n^sderately high(4)

t^floderate (3)

Moderalely low (2)

2LOW(1) None (0)


lo Tabte 1 ORAIVI long form for list. Add


Extensive >75% cover (-5)

^ _ ^ Moderate 25-75% cover (-3)

? V Sparse 5-25% cover (-1)

Neariy absent <5% oover (0)

Absent (1)

Vegetation Community Cover Scate

0

1

2

3

Ai>sent or comorises <0.1 ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quaNty. or comprises a

signincant part but is of low qualily

Present ^ d either comprises significant part of wetland's


part and is of Ngh quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetlands

vegetation arui is of ht$^ quality

Narrative Oescrtption of Vegetation Quality

(ow

mod

high

Low spp divaîty and/or predonUnance Of nonnative or

disturtiance tolerant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

although nonnative and/or disturtiance tolerant native spp

can also be present, and spedes diversity moderate to

moderately high, but generattyw/o presence of rare


A jiHedominance of nattve species, with nonnative spp

and/or disturtwnce tolerant naiive spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, ttut not always,

the presence of rare, threatened. <x endangered spp

6d. Microtopography.


_ Vegelated hummucks/tussucks

_ Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)

^ _ ^ Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh

0 AmpNbian breeding pools

3?

Mudflat and Open Water Ciass Qualitv

0 _ 1

2

3

Absent <0. Iha (0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Moderale 1 to <4h9 (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

High 4tra \9.B8 BCSBS) or mor^

Microtopographv Cover Scaie 0 1

2

3


of marginal aualitv

Present in moderate amounis, but nol of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality


and of highest auaiity

GRAND T0TAL(max 100 pts)

Reler lo »\B most receni ORAM Score CalibratJon Report for the sconng breakpoinls tMlwaen wetland categories al Ihe follgwing address: Mtp:/A«ww.epa.slate.oh.U5/dSWM01/401 .tiUnl

last revised 1 February 2001 ijm

ISite: ^ÛViLii |Rater($): / ) } ^ l , J ^ IDate: T - y - g l |

I <]^ I 0 ~ I Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). ^ ^ 6 6 pts ûblctal

X

Select one size class and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10,1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 aaes (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 aaes (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 aaes (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

ftlf-wOlT

f «* - fll 5

I ^ I _^ I Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pts. subtotal

^

EZinn s

2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average ZSm to <50m <82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) IMARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m {<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double cfieck and average. VERY LOW. 2nd grovrth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 yearsi^hrubland, young second grovrth foresL (5) MODERATELY HlGH^RSidenttSii, fenced pasture, pari<, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row aopping. mining, construction. (1}

max 30 pts. suOtoiai

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precîtation(l)

^Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) "^Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5)

3c. Maximum water depth. Select one. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

X

- ^

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland con'Idor (1) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Reguterly inundated/saturated (3)

^ Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

s:

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or douUe check and average. None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

3 < Recovered (7) y P Recovering <3)


"><t(]itch tile dike weir stomiwater input

point source (nonstormwrater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging

I IT) I ^"H I Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pis. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

Istone or none apparent (4) Recovered (3)

^^êcover ing (2) Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. Habitat development Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) 4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. None or none apparent (9) Check ail disturtaances observed Recovered (6) ZxC mowing Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

:s

S : ^

S

grazing ^^Clearcutting

selective cuiting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

siirub/sapfing removal tierbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging fanming nutrient enrichment

sufticua) this page ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

jSite: Rater(s): I Date:

nm subtotal this paga

I Q I g-^ I Met r ic 5. Spec ia l We t l ands . max 10 pts. sublolal ChecK all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested urefland (5) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydnjiogy (10) l_ake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 5 Qualitative Raling (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. maxzopte. sutMoiai 6a. Wet land Vegeta t ion Commun i t i es . Vegetation Community Cover Scale

Score ail present using 0 to 3 scale.

rr-rv

SL

Aquatic tsed Emergent Shrub Forest l\ûdflat$ Open water Other

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguQUS area Present and either comprises smal) part of weUand's 1 vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant pan ixit is of low quality Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 2 vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a smaii part and is of high quality ^___

y M ^

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one. High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately tow (2) Low(1)

"XlNone (0) 6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer Table 1 ORAM long fomi for list. Add or deduct pointe for coverage Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Nearly absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1) 6d. Microtopography. Score afl present using 0 to 3 scale. Vegetated hummucks/tussucks Coarse woody detwis >15cm {6'm) Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wettarwl's 3 vegetation and is of high quality


2

Low spp diversity and/or predoninance of nonnative or low disturbance tolerant native species Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, mod although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp to A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp high and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and 6tter\, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

n

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality /Masent <0.1ha (0.247 ages) LowO.l to <1ha(0.247 to 2.47ages) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 aaes)

\ 'S<S IGRAND TOTAMmax 100 pts)


Microtopography Cover Scale Absent Present very small amounts or if more common of marginal quality Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality



fVli'ô\^ ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: rAviAUili'J Rater(s): |<\^ l . J k ^ Date: ^ - 3 - 0 ^

l ^ Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). max 6 pM

I l>

Select one size dass and assign score. >60 acres {>20.2ha) (6 pts) 2510 <50 acres (10,1 to <20.2ha) (5 pis) 10 to <25 acres (4 lo <10.lha) (4 pts) 3 to <1Q acres {1.2 lo <4ha) (3 ptS) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to «;l.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to<0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0.i2tia) ( i pt) <0.1 ao-es (0.04ha) (0 pts)

ppMA/-0

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a

2b.

^^ i

Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Oo not doubte check. ^WIDE. Buflers average 50m (I64ft) or more around wetiand perimeter (7)

"$< MEDIUM. Buffers average 2Sm to ^SOm (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeler (4) NARROW Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wettand pwimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeler (0)

Inlensily of surrounding land use. Selecl one or double checlt and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, witdlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 years), shn^land, young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. ResidwrtBt. fenced pasture, pari^, conservation tillage. f\ew faHow fieki. (3) HIGH Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction, (1)

:Z2L

[ 30 pis.

Metrics. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score atl that apply.


3 < Precipitatron(l) yC SeasonaJ/lntermittent surfece water (3)

_ ^ Perennial surfece waler (lake or stream) (5) Mffi«mum watffl- depth. Sêct onty one and assign score.

>D.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.410 0.7m (15.710 27.6in) (2) <0.4mf<15,7in)(1>

3b

3d.

Score alt that apply. 100 year floodplain (1)

Conneciivity

^ Between stream/lake and other human use (1) ^ 1

3c.

Part of wetland/upland (e.g. fbrest), complex (1) ^ Part of riparian or upland corridor { i)

Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbt dieck. Semi- to permanenUy inividated/saturaled (4) Regut^y inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30an {t2in) (1)

3e. Modifications to nalural hydrotogic regime. Score one or double chedt and average.

None or none apparel (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

i n

Check all disturt)ances observed ditch tile dike

weir

stormwaler input

point source (nonstormwater) X filling/grading V road bed/RR track

dredging

ottier

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. tram 20 pts. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3} Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. HatMtat development Select only one and assign score Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

2 Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor lo fair (2) Poor(1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double checit and average.

H'\

S None or none apparent (9) (Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

Che

s ^

=k all disturi>ances observed mowing grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants


last revised 1 February 2001 jim

ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating


^1 suMOial this page

0 H<i max 10 pis.

max 20 pts.

fii (linpK

4f*r'\ ir '*^

n

Metric 5. Special Wetlands.

S P

Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

_^_ Old growth fore« (10)

^ Mature forested wettand (S)

t^ke Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestrided hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tritiutary wetland-restricted hydrotogy (5)


Relict Wet praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10}

Significant migratory songbird/water fow) habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 WeUand. See Questton 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, Interspersion, microtopography. 6a. vyettand Vegetation Communilies.

Score all present using 0 lo 3 scate.

Aquatic bed

Emwgent

Shnjb

FcH^st

Mudflats

Open water

Other

6b. horizcmtat (plan view) Intersperaon.

SeteÔTly one.

High (5)

Moderately high(4)

Moderate (3)

Moderately low (2)

^ L o w d )

None (0)


to Table 1 ORAIW long form for list. Add

or deduct poinls for coverage




t teariy absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)



Vegetated hwnmudtsftussucks

Vegetation Community

0 1

2

3

Cover Scate

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) conliquous area

Presenl and eilher comprises small part of wettand's

vegetation ar d is of moderate quality, or comprises a

significant part but is of tow quality

Present and either comprises signiticant part of wettand's

vegetalicMi and is of modête qualily or comprises a smaH

part and is of high quaNty

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wettand's

veoetalion and is of high qualily


low

mod

high


disturbance tolerant native species

Illative spp are dominant oomponerrt of the vegetation,

alôugh nonnative and/or disturiiance lol«^nt native spp


moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare


A predominance of naiive spedes, wilh nonnafive spp

and/or disturbance tolerant nattve spp absent or virlu^ly

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,


O Coarse vroody debris >1 Scm (6in)


fi I Amphibian breeding pools


0

1

2

3

Absent <a.1haC0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Moderate 1 lo <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

Hiflh 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale 0

1

2

3


of marginal quatity

Presenl in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest quality




Refer to the most recent ORAM Score Calibretton Repon (or (he scoring breakpoinls between welland categories al the following address; http://wi1vw.epa.5lat6.oh.Li5/dswMOIMOI hlml

last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

http://wi1vw.epa.5lat6.oh.Li5/dswMOIMOI

)QvL-{- - w O ^ O ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative fa t ing

mik^J Site: |Rat6r(s): l t \^ UMy^ Date: JT'^j-O'l

111 max 6 pt&.

^1 n

M e t r i d . Wetland Area {size). Select one size dass and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts)

j VJ IO to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pis) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 aaes (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) j<0.1 acres (0,04ha) (Opts)

/^/^y^- O ) ' ^

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. max 14 pis. 2a.

2b.

^VS ' 3.5

Calculate average buffer width. Select onty one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more araund wettand perimeter (7) •MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <l64ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW, Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <lOm (<32ft) around wetland perimeler (0)

Inlensily of surrounding land use. Select one or double chedc and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7)

^ t O W . Old field (>70 years), shrubland. young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tiHage. new faltow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row aopping. mining, conslrudion. (1)

Metrics. Hydrology. max 30 PIS. subtotti 3a. Sources of V\tater. Score alt that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) ^ ^ Other groundwater (3) f J 7 Predpilation (1)

3c.

3e.

|_^46easonal/tntermittent surface water (3) I VrPerennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score

3b.

3d.

|V|>07(27.6 in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(i)

Modifications to natural hydrotogic

[ ^ N o n e or none apparenl (12)

Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between slream/lake and olher human use (1)

f Part of wettand/upiand (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part of riparian or upland corndor (1)

Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. [Semi- to permanentiy inundated/saluraled (4) Regularty inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

^6 51

regime

Ch©

. Score one or double check and averaqe.

:k atl disturbances observed ditch tile dike

weir

stormvrater input

S point source (nonstormwater) fiHing/grading ' • road bed/RR track dredging othftr

max 20 pts.

4b

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development 4a. Substrate disturtaance. Score one or double check and average.

^ None or none apparent (4) y ^ Recovered (3)


Habitat developmenl. Setecl only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(l)

4o HabHat alteralion Score one or double check and average.

[p1 suMotal Ihis page

None or none appansnt (9) Recovered (6> Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)


^

^

mowing grazing clean=utling setective cutting vroody debris removal toxic pollutants

1

i<

y

shrub/sapling removal herit)aceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging fanning nutrient enrichment


ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s>: Date:

5^ suWoiai Ihts page

0 <i topis

J ^ I",

15

1^ 1 5

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Ched< ali lhat apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Oid growth forest (10)

Mature forested wettand (5)

Latte Erie coastat/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydnatogy (10)

Lake Erie oiastal/lribulary welland-restrided hydrotogy (5)


Relid Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

^ni f tcant mtgratory songbirdAvater fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 V^ttand. See Question 1 QuaHtative Raling (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities.

Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

Aquatic bed


ra 1

3 Emergent

Shrub

Fewest

l\Audftats

OJOpen water

Other

horizontal (plan view) Inla'sperston.

Setect only one.

High (5)

^ Moderately higlH4)

Moderate (3]

Moderately tow (2)

Low(1}

None (0)


to Table 1 ORAM long torm for list. Add


Extensive >75% cover (-5}



Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)


Score att present using 0 to 3 scale.

Vegetated hummud<s/lussudfs

Coarse woody debris > 15cm {6in)



0

1

2

3

Absent or comprises <0.1 ha (0.2471 acres) conliguous area

Present and eitha- comprises smalt part of wetland's

vegelation and Is of moderate quaiity. or comprises a

significant part bul is of tow quaUly

Present and either comprises significant part of wettand's

vegetation and is of moderate qualily or comprises a smaH

part and is of high qualily

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's

vegetation and is of high quatity

s

Narrative Description d Vegetation Qualitv

tow

mod

high


disturbance lolerant native spedes

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetatkm.

although nonnative and/or disturtaance tderant native spp

can also be presenl. and spedes diversity moderate to

moderately high, but generaltyw/o presence of rare


A predominance of native species, wilh nonnative spp

and/or disturtiance toteranl nadve spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not atw^s,


Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality 0

1

2

3


Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)



Microtopography Cover Scate

0 1

2

3

Absent Presenl vary smalt amounts or if more common

of marginal quality

Presenl in mnrtArate amounis. but not of highest quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality

Present in morierate or greater amounts



Refer to the most recent ORAM Score Calibraiion Reporl (or the scoring breakpoinls between wetland CBl«gorie3 al the followhs address: hllp://www.epa.state.oh.u5/dsw/401/401.hti7ii


http://www.epa.state.oh.u5/dsw/401/401.hti7ii

wrunivi V. n.v r i c i u r u i i i i w u d i i u L a i i v c ixnt i i iy

Site: TPfrti Rater(s): /4tM" 1 PlA Date: 5-9 '^ '^

^

max 14 pts.

max 30 pts.

max 20 pis.

1

•V ct

M e t r i d . Wetland Area (size), Select one size dass and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <5Q acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <1Q.1 ha) (4 pis) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 lo <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 aaes (D.04ha) (0 pts)

At-f-wiOdO

(f(\\J-o)^

^ 13

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Seled only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (1646) or more around wedand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4) NAf ROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32fl to <S2ft) around wetland perimeter (1)

^ 3 ^ R Y NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perrneter (0) 2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Setecl one or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW. Otd field (>1D years), shrubland, young second growth forest. (5)

2 MODERATELY HIGH. Residenlial, fenced pasture, park, conservation Ifllage, new fallow field. (3) IHIGIH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row C70pping, mining, construction. (1)

^

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Precfpftafion (1) Seasonat/tntemiittent surface water (3) Perennial sur^ce water (lake or stream) (5)

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only (»ie and assign score

@>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

Modtfications to natural hydrologic

None or none apparent (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3)

\ ^ Recent or no recovery (1)

3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score att lhat apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wettand/upiand (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundafion/safurab'on. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to pemianentiy inundated/saiurated (4)

^ ^ Regulariy inumiated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e

2 L J :

regime

Che

. Score one or double check and average.

:k all disturi>ances observed ditch tite dike weir stormwater input

i point source (nonstonnwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging olher

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development 4a. Substrate disturt)ance. Score one or doubte check and average.

None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2)

y I Recent or no recovery (1) 4b. KaSitat development. Select only one and assign score.

ExceHenl (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poortofafr(2)

4c. HSât Poor (1)

alteration. Score one or double ched< and average.


Subtotal this page

Check all disturiaances observed

V : ^

1—

mowing grazing deareutting seiective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants 1 1


vyrvMiM V. o.\J ritîu r u i i i i Muai iu iauw r\aiiiiy


/ ( • subtotal this page /!/v)^/-î^

0 10 Metric 5. Special Wetlands, max 10 pts. subtotal Check

1 '^ 1%

that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old grovrth foresl (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

l^ke Erie coastat/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrotogy (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrotogy (5)

Lê Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relid Wei Praires (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitalive Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

pi

fnax 20 pts. subtotal

tViji^Mj

6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities.


-L

—

Aquatic bed

Emeiênt

Shrub

Forest

Mudflats

Open water

Other

6b. horizonlal (plan view) Inlerspersion.

Seted only one.

!

.k

[High (5)

Moderately high(4)

Moderate (3)

Moderately low (2)

Low(1)

None (0)

6G. Coverage of invasive plarrts. Refer

to Table 1 ORAM long frwm for list. Add


K Extensive >75% cover (-5)



Neariy absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)


Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

J l i l 5

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks

Coarse woody debris >15cm (Sin)




0

1

2

3

Cover Scale

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderale quality, or comprises a

significant part but is of low quaHty

Present and either comprises significant part of wettand's


part and is of high quality


vegetation and is of high quality


low

mod

high


disturbance toterant naiive spedes

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetatton,

although nonnative and/or disturban<^ toterant native spp




A predommance of native species, with nonnative SJ:^

and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or \flrtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always.


a


0

1

2

3


Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2,47 acres)



Microtopography Cover Scale \

0

1

2

3

Absent

Present very small amounts or if more common

of marqinal qualitv

Present in moderate amounts, but not of liighesl

qualitv or in small amounts of highest quality


and of highest quatity


Referto me most recent ORAM Score Calibration Report for the scaring breakpoints between weiland categories at ifie loBcrwrtng address; tittp:/ANww.epa.siate.oh,usWswH01M01 html

wrvMim v> it.xi r t B i u r u i m w u a i i i i L a u v i ; rxauuy

/vlfMltfM^ Site: Rater(s): Û( Uv.my" Date: ^ - ^ - o l

3

S g


>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <:20.2ha) (5 pts)

.10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) " ^ 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to •:0.12ha} (1 pi) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

H f -^K>0^^

guiW'O''^

max 14 pis. sublolal

5^5 js^"

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double <: eck.

WIDE. Bulfers average 50m (164fi) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around welland perimeter (4) 'NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY IMARROW. Buffers average <1 Om (<32ft) around weUand perimeter (0)

intensity of surrounding land use. Setect one or doubte check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

P Z LOW. Old fiekl (>10 years), shrubland. young second growth forest. (5) 5 ? lyiODERATELY HtGH. Re^dential. fenced pasture, parit, conservation tiHage, new fallow fieW. (3) ^ _ HtGH. Urtian, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

2b

max 30 pts. sutriotal

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) OUier groundwater (3)

"xC-r r r . J ' ^ .

^ Precipitation (1) Seasonal/lntermittertt surface water (3)

• y Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score.

"n>0.7(27.6in)(3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

^<0.4m(<15.7in)-(1) rications to nalural hydrologi<


3b.

3d.

1 Connectivity. Score all that apply.

100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/take and other human use (1) Part of wetland/uptand (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of ripân or iH land conidor (1}

Duration inunda1ion/satv?ation. Score or^ or dfcil chec^. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

><;

X ^ Regularty inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cn) (12in) (1)

/5 UiS

regime

Che

. Score one or double check

A ali disturbances observed ditch tite dike weir stormwater input

and<

: ^

average.

point source (nonstormwater) filting/grading road bedfl R track dredging 1 other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 pts. 4a.

4b.

4c.

Substrate dishjrbance. Scor^ one or doubte cêdt and average. None or none apparent (4)

? r Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

Habitat development, Selecl onty one and assign score. Exceltent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

K Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(l)

Habitat alteration. Score one or doubte cêck and average.

LH-^

^

stAtotal this page


Check all disturtiances obsen/ed |

JC

mowing grazing dearculting sêctive cuttirtg woody debris renioval toxic poHutants


urxMiw V. a.u r i t f iu r u i i i i uuaiit iMuve r^^Liiiy


k-^f sid}totai mis page

0 v-^n max 10 pts.

^TTsTT max 20 pis.

pLj- k

PO\n/

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unresb-icted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetiand-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) RelictWet Praires (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant migratory songbinMvater fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wettand Vegetation Communities. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

Aquatic bed _ 2 Emergent

Shmb f) Forest

Mudflats Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) interspersion. Setect only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long form lor list. Add or deduct poinls for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) (hearty absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)

6d. MiCTOtopography. Score aH present using Q to 3 scale.

Vegetated hummucks/lussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)

Q Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools

Jl

Vegetation Communitv 0 1

2

3

Cover Scale Absent orcompnses <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quatity, or comprises a significant part but is of low quatity

Present and eilher comprises significant part of wetland's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's veqetation and is of high quality

2S.

Narrative Description of Vegetation (âltty low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominarK% of nonnative or disbjriTance tolerant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant naiive spp can also be presenl, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp

A predontinance of native species, witti nonnative spp and/or disturbance toterant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

5^/


Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low Q.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale 0 1

2

3


of marginal quality Present in moderate amounte, but not of highest

quality or in small amounts of highest quatity Present In moderate or greater amounts

and of highesi quality


Reter to the most receni ORAM Score Calibration Reporl for the scoring breakpoinls between wetland categories at the following address: Mlp:flWww epa staie.oh.us/asw/401/401.ntml

http://staie.oh.us/asw/401/401.ntml

^./r\^M«i V. a.w r i t ^ iu r u i i i i k t u a i i n u i u v c n a u i i y

iRater(s): P\^ U S > Site: /^friMU^ bate: S'V-C?^

^

l^^^naxepts.

3 suDtotal

5 ^

/f/HN^-'~o09

max 14 pts. siôtal

M e t r i d . Wetland Area (size), Select one size class and assign score.

3^50 3^^^ (>20.2ha) {6 pts) ' 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) " 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pte) J 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pte) [ 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1,2ha) (2pts) ' 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) " <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do nol double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m lo <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeler (4)

^ NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetiand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2b. Iritensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average. __ VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older foresl, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, elc. (7) X LOW. OW fiekl (>10 years), shrubland, young second growtti forest. (5)

^ MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urtsan, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

f^l\-^MOy^

P3 ^ / Metric 3. Hydrology. max 30 pts. subtotal 3a.

3c.

3e.

Sources of Water. Score alt ttiat apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3)

>;[ Precipitation (1) >^ Seasonal/intermittent surface water (3) >C Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5)

Majanum water depth. Select only one and assign score. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.410 0.7m (15.7 to 27.Bin) (2)

2]<0.4m(<15.7in)(1) Modifications to natural hydrologic regime^

3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stieam/take and oVnsx human use (1) Part of wetiand/bpland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

3d-

X Sc Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dU check. Semi- to permanentiy inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) SeasonaHy saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1) S


) 3 HH

Score one or double check and average.

Oieck all disturbances observed ditch tite dike

weir stoimwater input

X

point source (nonstonnwater) ^ filling/grading

road bed/RR b^ck dredging other ,

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 20 fUs. 4a.

4b.

4c.

Substrate disturiDance. Score one ordmjbte chedc and average. None or none apparent (4)

5 ? Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

Habitat devetopment. Select only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

2 Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1)

Habitat atteratk>n. Score one or double check and average.

1

z

subtotal lîs page

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Receni or no recovery (1)

Check ail disturbances observed

1 ^

mowing grazing clearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

shmb/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrictimenl

H. O.V r i c iu ru i i i i uUdiiiiiciuw rvdiiiiy


^1 subtotal this

0 pap'

fH Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Otd growth forest (10) Matijre forested wetiand (5) Lake Erie coastalAributary wetiand-urêstricted hydrology (10) l.^ke Erie coastal/tributary wetland-reslricted hydrotogy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) RetictWet Praires (10)

Known occuri'ence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10) Significant moratory songbird/waterfowl fiabitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitetive Rating (-10)

n 5) Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

pi

max20pts. subtotal 6a. V\fetland Vegetation Communities. Score all presenl using 0 lo 3 scate.

Aquatic bed Emergent

I Shaib I Forest

Mudflats Open water Otiier

6b. horizontel (plan view) Inlerspersion. Select only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately tow (2) Low(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Tabte 1 ORAM long form for list. Add or deduct points for coverage

Extensive >76% cover (-5) Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Nearty absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography, Score all present using 0 to 3 scale.

/ Vegetated hummucks/tussucks / Coarse woody debris >1Scm (6in) f\ Standing dead >25cm (1 Oin) dbh Q Amphibian breeding pools


2

3

Absenl orcompnses <0.lha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetiand's

vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low q u a ^

Present and either comprises significant part of wetiand's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's vegetation and is of high quality

Nanrative Description of Vegetatton Quality low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or disturiDance tolerant native species

Native spp are dominant civnponent of the vegetetion, altiiough nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species, wilh nonnative spp and/or distijrt}ance toterant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, tiireatened. or endangered spp

51


Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha {0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2,47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.83 acres) or more


2

3

Absent Present very snfiall amounts or if more common

of marginal quaiity Present in moderate amounts, but not of Nghest

quaiity or in small amounts of highesi qualitv Present in moderate or greater amounts

and of highesi quaiity


Refer lo the mosi recent ORMfl score Calibrôn Report tor ihe scorirtg breakpoints betweer wetland caiônes at ihe followKig address: http://www epastale.oh usA)svir/40l/401 html

http://www

wr \M in V. o.v r r e i u r u i i i i wuo i i i i Lduvo râi i i iy

Site: /îM)*M |Rater(s): p/)^4- l&^dA^ [Pate: 5^-e^-J '7

^ ^ ^ ^ a x pts.

-b

14 pts. subtatal

max 30 pts.

max 20 pts.

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Setect one size dass and assign score.

f\L\'v.iO^^

H 1

?50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <W.1ha) (4 pte) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) 0.3 lo <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <:0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

KfO^ -02 )

OA V

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 lo <164ft) around wettand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m lo<25m(32ft to <82ft) around wetiand perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Setect one or doubte check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or okJer fbrest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc (7) LOW. Otd fteld (>10 years), ^rubland, young second growtii forasL (5) MOOERATELY HIGH, i^^nenti^^nced pasiure, park, conservation tillage, new faBow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construcôn. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a.

3c.

3e.

Sources of Water. Score all tiiat apply. High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) precH3itatk>n (1) Seasonal/intermittent surface water (3)

V^Perennial surface water (lake or slream) (5) Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score.

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2)

3b.

3d.

y^ ^

yf<0.4m(<15.7in)(1) Mc^cations to natural hydrotogic regime.

None or none apparent (12) ^ 2 Recovered (7)


Connectivity. Score atl that appty. ^ 100 year floodplain (1)

Betiveen stream/lake and otiier human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanentiy inundated/saturated (4)

3^- Regulariy inundated/saturaled (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

V) HS

Score one or double dieck and average.

Check atl disturbances observed dtich tile dike weir

stormwater input

5 s

point source (nonstwmwater) filling/grading road t>ed/RR track dredging other Sfli 'b 'Tjrw*^ /Wm t>v /yJ r^ 'T>* j

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development

HH

X

subtotal this page

4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or doubte check and average. None or none apparent (4)

] 2 Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitet develt^ment. Setecl only one and ass^n score. Exceltent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to teir (2) poor(1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovwy (1)

1 —t Check all disturt}ances obsen/ed |

i i

H

mowing grazing ctearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants

shrob/sapllng removal herbaceous/aquatic t)ed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichmenl j

UfVMivi V. o.v r i t f l u r u i l i i Wucii iULativt: rvaitui}


vm sLAtatal this page

0 ^M

^ f ^ W '03-)

Metric 5. Special Wetlands, subtotal Check alt

w s a

that apply and score as indicated, 'Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetland-unreslricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tributary w^land-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relicl Wet Praires (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered spectes (10) Signilicanl migratory songbird/Water fowl habitet or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20 pts. 6a. Wetiand Vegetetion Communities.

Score atl present using 0 to 3 scate. _ Aquatic bed

0 - Emergent % Shrub Q Forest

_ Mudflats _ Open water

Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one.

^ H i g h (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3)

X I Moderately low (2) Low (1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive Fânts. Refer to Table 1 QRAM tong form for list Add or deduct points for covâge


/ < Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absenl <5% cover (0) Absenl (1)

Micôtopci raphy. Score all present using 0 to 3 scale.

\ Vegetated hummudcs/tussucks Q. Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)

, ^ Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh ^ Amphibian breeding pools

Vegetation Community 0 1

2

3

Cover Scate Absent or comprises <0.1 ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and efther comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quaiity. or comprises a significant part but is of low quality

Present and either comprises significant part of wefland's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high qualitv

Present and comprises sigritficanl part, or more, of wetland's vegetation and is of high quatity

Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or disturtiance toterant native spectes

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, although nonnative and/or disturbance toterant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generaltyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species, witii nonnative spp and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absenl or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

6d

^


Absent <0.1 ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Microtopography Cover Scale Q 1

2

3

Absent Present very sma» amounts or If more common


qualitv or in small amounts of highest quaHty Present in moderate or greater amounte



Refer to Ihe most recent ORAM Score Calibration Report for the scoring breakpoints between wetland categories at the following address: htlp:WWww.epa.stale.oh,us/dswM0i/401 html

http://Www.epa.stale.oh,us/dswM0i/401

wrv/în V, o.v r iw iu r u i i i i w u d i i u i o i i w r\ci l i i iy

J7 Site: MKI/IWJ Rater(s): / M - L Date: 5" J-O'^

^ 0 ax 6 pis.

S 2

M e t r i d . Wetland Area (size), Select one size dass and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pte) 26 to <50 acres (10.1 to <:20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 lo <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <:10 acres (1.2 to •=4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 lo <3 acres (0.12 lo <1.2ha) (2pls) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

A:l+-W)0V5

:K

^(f)Y)/ ' 0 ^ ^

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. inax 14 pts. 2a.

2b.

X

n 55

Calculate average buffer width. Seled onty one and assign score. Oo not doubte check. WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetiand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to •=25m (32fi to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1) VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft> around wetiand perimeter (Q)

Intensity of surrounding land use. Setect tme or doubte check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7)

OW. Old field (>10 years), shmbland. young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. Ftesidential, fenced pasture, park, consen/ation tittege, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, industiial, open pasture, row cropF»ng, mining, constiuction. (1)

V

Metrics. Hydrology. max 30 pts. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all tti^ apply.

High pH groundwaier (5) Other groundwater (3) Precîtation(l)

^ p Seasonal/intermittent surface water (3) Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5)

3c. Maximum water depth. Seiect only one and assign score. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0,7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0,4m(<15.7in)(1)

3e. FiTladifications to natural hydrologic

3b. Connectivity. Score att that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl diedt. Semi- to pennanently inundated/saturated (4)

"5? Regularly inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (I2in) (1)

None ornone apparent (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

i3>5 - b l ^

regime . Score one or doubte check and averaqe.

Check ali disturbances observed j

^ ^ m

1

ditch tile dike

weir stormwater input

i . _

point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track

dredging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. max 2D pts. '^- Substrate disturbance. Score one or doubte check and average.

X None or none apparent (4) y Recovered (3)


4b. IHabitat development. Select onty one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

S ^ Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1)

4a Habitat alteration. Score one or double died; and average


-b^.5 subtotal this page

Check att disturtsances observed ||

:2L

'—i

mowing grazing ctearcutting seiective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutants 1 i

shnjb/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

.-rrvMin «. o.v r i e i u r u i i i i w u a i i u u i i i v e rva i i i iy


m subtotal Ihis page

0 3«.>^ Metric 5. Special Wetiands. max 10 pts. Check

1 %$

that apply and score as indicated. Bog (10) Fen (10) Otd growth foresl (10) Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastat/tributary wetiand-unresti-lcted hydrotogy (10) Lake Erie coastel/tributary wetland-restricled hydrology (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered spedes (10) Significant migratory songbird/waterfowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 2 0 1 ^ 6a. Wetiand Vegelalion Communities.

Score all presenl using 0 lo 3 scale. Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub Foresl Mudflats Open water Otiier_

0 1 ^

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. Select only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Uw(1) None (0)

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Tabte 1 ORAM long form for list Add or deduct pointe for coverage


> < Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <5% cover (0) Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scaie.

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks

Vegetation Community 0

> 1

2

3

Cover Scale Absenl or comprises <0.1 ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

vegetation and is of moderate quaUty, or comprises a significant part but is of low qualfty

Present and eittier comprises significant part of wetland's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's vegetation and is of high quality

Narrative Descriptton of Vegetation Quality tow

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or disturbance toterant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation, aflhough nonnative and/or dislurtjance tolerant native spp can also be present, and species diversity moderate to moderately high, but generaltyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native spedes. with nonnative spp and/or disturbance toterant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diveraity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, tiireatened, or endangered spp

j [ Coarae woody debris >15cm (6in) i Standing dead >25cm (IOin) dbh

(\ Amphibian breeding pools

HAudflat and Open Water Ciass Quality 0 1 2 3

Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2,47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more


%.')

0 1

2

3



quality or in small amounte of highest quatity I=>re5ent In moderate or greater amounte


GRA^4D TOTAL{max 100 pts)

Refer to the most receni CffiAM Score Calibration Report for the scoring tweakpoinis beiween wetland categories at the following address: http:/fwww.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/4O1/401 .html

http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/4O1/401

wrvnm v. o.v nxsiv r u i m uuciiitutiuvt; rvduit^j

ll^0tiUi Site: Rater(s): /W wf l ^ / ^ Date: S~3~a-^

^ ^ ^ • a x G p t K .

a

max 14 pts.

max 30 pts.

3 33 max 20 pis.

^1

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size), )[^.tf-vooV^

3 ^

Setecl one size dass and assign score. >50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 lo <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pis)

V 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <:1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0.12ha) (1 pt) <0 1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

^(hvl/-o^3

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a.

2b.

Calculate average buffer width. Seled only one and assign score. Do not double check. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetiand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around weHand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m(32fl to <82ft) around wetiand perimeter (1)

^ VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0) Intensity of surrounding land use. Setect one or doubte chec:k and ava'age.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth orolderforest, prairie, savannah, wildlite area, etc. (7) LOW. Okt field (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth foresL (5)

1^ ao V ^ MODERATELY HIGH.C^JSiaehtiahsfenced pasture, park, consen/ation tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HtGH. Urt)an, sidustrial, open pasture, row aopping. mining, constnjction. (1)

Metrics. Hydrology. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score ali that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwal^ (3)

" l ^ Precipitation (1) > q Seasonal/lntermitlent surface water (3)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3c. Maximum waler depth. Seled only one and assign score.

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4to0.7m(16.7to27.6in)(2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

3b. Connectivity. Score all ttiat apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between slream/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundation/saturatkin. Sa)re one or dbl check. Semi- to permanentiy inundated/satorated (4) Reguterly inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally satorated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3d, IS

Z 3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) Recovered (7) Reravering (3) Recent orno recovery (1)

Check all disturbances observed ^ d i t c h

tite dike weir stormwater input

poinl source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4) Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent tx no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score. 1 Excelienl (7)

Very good (6) " Good (6) ^ Moderately good (4) 1 Fan- (3) 1 Poor to fair (2) " PDor(1)

4a Habitet alteralion. Score one or double check and average.

. None or none apparent (9) 2 i ecovered (6)


subtotal this page

Check all disturbances observed |

^

'

mowing grazing clearcutting setective cutting woody debris removal toxic poHutants

shrob/sapling removal herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nutrient enrichment

uruni'i V. o.v THsiu r u i i i i vuai iuui i ive r\«tuiiy


1>3 subtotal this page

O 3>3 max 10 pts.

max 20 pts. subtotal

£K

19

^ f A l ^ '

< Z)^

Metric 5. Special Wetlands. Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growth forest (10) Matore forested weUand (5) Lake Erie coastal/ti-ibutary wetiand-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erie coastal/tr&utary wetland-restricted hydrology (5) Lake Plaffi Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) Relict Wet Praires (10) Knovm occunence stete/federal tiireatened or endangêd species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitet or usage (10) Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

0^3

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

Aquatic bed Emergent ShnO) Forest Mudflats Open wat^ Other

6b. horizontel (plan vnew) Interspersbn. Select iwily one.

High (6) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3)

• Moderatdy tow (2) 2 Low(1)

None (0)

6c. Coverage of in\rasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long form for list, Add or dedud points for coverage

Extensive >75% cover (-5) - Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) X Sparse 6-25% cover (-1)

Neariy atisent <5% caver (0) Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

C) Vegetated hummucksAussud(s f Coarse woody debris >15cm (Oin) UStanding dead >25cm (IOin) dbh


2

3

Cover Scale Absent or comprises <0,1 ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Presenl and either comprises smal part of wefland's

vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a stqnJficant part but is of low quality

Present and either comprises significant part of wefland's vegetation and is of moderate quatity or comprises a smalt part and is of h^h quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wefland's veqetation and is of high quality

Narrathre Descripticm of Vegetation Quafity

low

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or distorbance tolerant native spedes

Native spp are dominant component of tiie vegetation, altiiough nonnative and/or disturtsance tolerant native spp can also be present, and spedes diveraity moderate to moderately high, but generallyw/o presence of rare threatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species, witii nonnative spp and/or distort)ance tolerant native spp absent or virtoally absent, and high spp diveraity and often, but not always, the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Class Quaiity 0 1 2 3

Absent <0,1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) Hiqh 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

jÂmphibian breeding pools Microtopograptiy Cover Scale



quality or in smalt amounts of highest quality Resent in moderate or greater amounts



Refer to the most receni ORAM Score Calibration Report lor the scoring breakpoints between wetland categories at me following afit&ess: hiip:;/www.epa.statft.oft.us/dsw/401M01 .html

http://www.epa.statft.oft.us/dsw/401M01

\ j t \ M m V. o-v r i e r u r u i i i t Uua i i u tauwB ndLi . .y

Isite: !^M)fild\ Rater(s): f M U f i k ^ Date: T^?-^"^

X

max 14 pts

u max 30 pts.

tnax20pts.

ILS

^f(\y-Q^'i

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size), Seled one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10,1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

" ^ 0 . 3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <D.12ha) (1 pt) <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculate average Uiffer width. Seted only cuie and assign score. Do not doubte check.

WIDE. Buflers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetiand perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to •=25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeler (1)

3 ^ VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetiand perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of suirounding land use. Setect one or double check and average. VERY LOW, 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7) LOW. Old field (>10 year^^^gjcufetend. young second growth forest (5)

?^MODERATELY HIGH. (^Siden^fenced pastore, park, conservation tiltege, new fallow field. (3) HIGH. Uit)an, industiial, open pasture, row aopping, mining, consloidten. (1)

fvtf - vdoyi

s

Metric 3. Hydrology. sublolal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all tiiat apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Other groundwater (3) Predpftalion (1) Seasonat/tntemiittent surfece water (3) Perennial surfece water (lake or stream) (5)

Majdmum water depth. Seted only one and assign score. "^>0.7(27.6in)(3)

0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) ^<0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

3c.

3b.

3d.

Connectivity. Score all lhat apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Beiween shâm/lake and other human use (1) Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. forest), comptex (1) Part ofriparian or upland corridor (1)

Duration inundaticMi/saturation. Score one or db) dieck. Semi- to permanently Inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy inundated/saturated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally satorated in upper 30cm {12in) (1)

2

3e. Modifications to natural hydrotogic


S a)

regime . Score one or double check and averaqe.

1 Check at) disturbances observed | s ditch tile dike weir stormwaler input

3 point source (nonstormwater) filling/grading road bed/RR track dredging other

1 —

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development 4a.

4b.

4c,

Sub^rate disturbants. Score one or doubte check and average. ^None or none apparent (4)

V^Recovered (3) t ^ f J r t v ^ / W n / O ^ j O f ^ j ^ M s Recovering (2) I Recent or no recovery (1)

HatMtat development. Setect only one and assign score Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5) Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to feir (2)

^ P Q o r ( l ) Habitat alteration.

7

Score one or doutrfe dieck and average.

^ \

2

suE>toiai this page

None or none apparenl (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no reco\«ry (1)


Z :><:

"V

mowing grazing deareutting selective cutting woody debris removal loxic pollutants

1 S shrub/sapling removal

herbaceous/aquatic bed removal sedimentation dredging farming nulrieni enrichment

wr\Mni V. o.v rit?iu r u i ' i i vuaiiuiciiivi? r\<iiiiiy


?ii subtotal this page

Q 9 Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pts. subtotal Ched< all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10) Fen (10) Old growtti forest (10) Matore forested wetiand (5)

t^ke Erte coastat/tributary wetiand-unrestricted hydrology (10) Lake Erte coastal/tributary wetland-restricled hydrotogy (5) Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10) RelKt Wet Praires (10)

Known occunence state/federal threatened or endangêd species (10) Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10) Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

- ^ H nriaxZOpte. siAtotal

1

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. 6a. Wetiand Vegâtion Communittes. Score all present using 0 to 3 scate.

Aquatic bed Emergent Shrub Forest Mudfiate Open water Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interepersion. Select only one.

High (5) Moderately high(4) Moderate (3) Moderately low (2) Low(1)

V None (0) 6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer to Table 1 ORAM long fonn for list. Add or deduct points for coverage

- Extensive >75% cover (-5) A Moderate 25-75% cover (-3)

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) Neariy absent <:5% cover (O) Absenl (1)


Vegetated hummudts/tussucks Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)

0 Standing dead >25cm (1 Oin) dbh Amphibian breeding pools


2

3

Cover Scale Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area Present and eitiier comprises smafl part of wefland's

vegetatton and is of moderate quality, or comprises a significant part but is of low qualitv

Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small part and is of high quality

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetiand's vegetation and is of high qualitv


low

mod

high

Low ^ p diver^ty and/or predominance of nonnative or disturbance toterant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetatton, although nonnative and/or distorbance tolerant native spp can also be present, and spedes diveraity moderate to moderately high, but genâllyw/o presence of rare tiireatened or endangered spp

A predominance of native species. wiUi nonnatisre spp and/or disturbance toterant native spp absent or virtually absent, and high spp diversity and of t^ , but not sdways, flie presence of rare, threatened, or endanga'ed spp

Ul


Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres) Low 0.1 lo <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres) Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres) Hiqh 4ha (9.88 acres) or more


2

3

Absenl Present very small amounts or if more common


quality or in small amounts of hiqhest quality Present in moderate or greater amounts



Refer lo the most recent ORAM Score Calibration Report for the scoring breaKpoints between wetland categories at the following address http:r/www epa.stale,oh.us/dsw/40l/40l mm!

ORAM V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating p^l^-^C^t

Isite: mÂklnJI^ Rat6r(s): / V ) ^ U Date: 5 ^ - 5 - c r j

^ - > max 6 pts

3 C max 14 pis.

max 30 pts.

max 20 pis.

y\

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Select one size dass and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to «20.2ha) (5 pts) 10 to <25 acres (4 lo <10.1ha} (4 pis)

V 3to<l0acres(1.2to<4ha){3pts) r ^ 0.3 to <3 acres (0 12 to <1.2hai (2pte)

0.1 lo<D.3 acres (0.04 lo<0,l2ha)(1 pt) <0,1 acres (O.CWha) (0 pts)

j lC[\)^^0^^

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a.

2b.

15 5^

Cateulale awrage buffer widlh. Setect onty one and assign score. Do not double chedi. WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wettand perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <S0m (82 to <164ft} around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers avwage 10m lo<25m{32fI to <62ft) around wetland F«rimeter(1)

^ J v E R Y IMARROW. Buffers average <:iOm (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

Intensity of surrounding land use. Seted one or double chedc and average. V^RY LOW. 2nd growth or dder forest, prairie, savanr^. wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW, Otd fteld (>10 years), shrubland, young second growth forest, (5)

/MMODEFtATELY HIGH. I^!^9ent^tenced pastore, paric. conservation tillage, new fallowfiekJ. (3) HIGH. Urban, industrial,^JefrpaSlure. row cropping, mining,-constnjction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a.

3c.

Sources of Water. Score all tiiat apply. High pH groundwater (5)

Other groundwater (3) >f Precipitation (t)

Seasonal/lntennittent sur^ce waler (3) Perenruai surtece water (lake or stream) (5)

Maximum water deplti. Seled onty one and as^gn score. >0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 lo 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(l)

3b. ConnectivKy, Score all that apply 100 year floodplain ( i) Between stream/lake and other human use (1} Part of wetiand/upland (e.g. fbrest), complex (1) Part of riparian or upland conidor (1)

Duratton inundation/satoration. Score one or dbl check. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4) Regulariy mundaled/saturated (3) Seasonaily inundated (2) Seasonally satorated In upper 30cm {12in) (1)

3d t ^

3e. Modificalions to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double dieck and average.

21 None or none apparenl (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

5 ^ M

Chedc atl distui^nces (Served

: ^ ditch tite dike

wen-

stomiwater input

i point source (nonstormwater)

^^Jfitling/grading road bed/RR trade ck^ging other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a. Sut>strate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

^ None or none a(H>arenl (4) y Recovered (3)

Recovering (2) _^^ Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat devetopment. Seted only one and assign score. Excellent (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

2 Moderately good (4) ^ Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1)

4c, Hatstet alleratton. Score one or double check and average.

None or none ^parenl (9) S ^ I Recovered (6)


subtotal Ihis page

Check all disturtiances observed I

• ^

^

mowing grazing clearcutting . ^ : selective cutting '• woody debris removal toxic pollutants

shmb/safrfing removal

sedimentetion dredging farminp nutrienSt enrichment


QRAAA V. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rateris): Date:

?)4 subtotal Ihis page

0 i 4 10 pts

t . Hti

Metric 5. Special Wetiands. Check all lhal apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Otd growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/lributary wetland-unrestrided hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrdt^gy (5)



Known occurrence slate/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitet or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualilayve Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. Vegetation Communitv Cover Scate

5'

max 20 pts. sublotal

dtrt /«^^ i*'"*-''

^^/nJ ^ ' i ^

6a, Weitand Vegetetion Communities,


2d

Aquatic bed

Emergent

Shaib

Forest

Mudfials

Open water

Other

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion.

Seted only one.

X

High (5)

Moderately high(4)

iVlDderate (3) Moderately tow (2)

Low(l)

None (0)

6c. Coverage ol invasive plants. Refer

to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add


—

^




Nearly absent <S% cover (0)

Absent (1)

6d. Microtopography. Score at[j)resent using 0 to 3 scale.

^

•

Vegelated hummucks/tussucks

Coarse woody debris > 1 Scm (6in)


Amphibian breeding pods

Absenl orcomprTses<0-1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Present and either con^rises small part of wettand's

vegetetton and is of moderate quality, or comfxises a

signilicanl part but is of low quatity

Present and either comprises signiftcarit part of wetland's

vegetatkvi and is of mcxterate quat^ or <x>mprises a smaH

part and is of high quaBty

Prssent and comprises significant part or more, of lA^ttend's

vegetatton and is of high quality


tow

mod

high


distoriMHce tderant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetetion.

atthough nonnative and/or disturiDance tolerani native s |^


moderately high, but generattyw/o presence of rare


A predominance of native spectes. with nonnalive spp

and/or distorbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

absenl and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

the presence of rare. Ihreatened. or endangered spp

Mudflat and Open Water Ciass Qualitv

40

0

1

2

3

Absent <o.lha (0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Moderate 1 lo <4ha (2.47 lo Q.SS acres)


Microtopography Cover Scale 0 1

2

3

Absent Present very smalt arrwunts or if more common

of marginal quality

Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest qualily

Present in moderate or greater amounis



Refer lothe most recent ORAM Score Calibfaiion Report lor the scoring breakpoints between wetland categories at the (oUwwing address' hWp./fwww.Bpa.Staie.oh.MSWsw/WtMtn.tilml

last revised 1 February 2001 iJm

http://www.Bpa.Staie.oh.MSWsw/WtMtn.tilml

ORAM V. $.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

sitel f^Mlellii Ratef(s): / W U

^ 3 max 6 pis

max 30 pis.

rriEix 20 pts.

5 J-

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). Seled one size class and assign score.

] > 5 0 acres (>30.2ha) (6 pts) "_ 25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (6 pts) " 10to<25acres(4to<10.1ha)(4pts)

S F 3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts) _ 0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <l.2ha) (2pts) [ 0.1 to <0,3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt) " <0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

1^1^ 'o i

50 as

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a, Calculate average bufter width. Seled rmly one and assign score. Oo not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average SOm (164fl) or more around wettend perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Bulfers average 25m lo <50m (82 to <l64ft) around weitand perimeler (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wettand perimeter (1) yERy NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around welland perimeter (0)

2b tniensity of surrounding land use. Sded one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd grcnvth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW. Okl field (>10 years), shnjlând. young sea>nd gn>wth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH.. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation lillage, new fellow M d . (3) HtGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, constnJdion. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) Otfier groundwater (3) Predpilation (1) Seasonal/lntemiittent surfece water (3) Perenniat surtace water (lake or slream) (5)

3c- Mawmum water depth. Seted onty one and assign score >0.7 (27.6ln) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 lo 27.6tn) (2) <0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

ficalions lo natural hydrotogit


3b.

3d.

ponnectivily. Score aff that appfy--lOOyearfloodplain(l) Beiween stream/lake and other human use (1)

>QJ Part of welland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1) ? < Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Duraticffi inundatton/saturation. Score one or dbl dieck. Semi- to permanenlly inundaled/saturated (4)

"5? Regularly inundated/saiurated (3) Seasonally inundated (2) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) ( i)

2 Recovered (7) V Recovering (3)


13 H)

regime . Score one or doubte chedc and averaqe. 1 "^^-^"^—'^— l i 1 (êck atl disturbances observed |

\ ^ ditdi life dike

vreir

stonnwaler inpul

.k

point source (nonstormwater) filing/grading road bed/RR trade

dredging

other

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4a.

4b.

Substrate disturbance. Score one OT double check and average. None or none apparenl (4)

H\

4C. Habit

2

subtolal this page

^ Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Recent or no recovery (1)

ijabitat development. Seted onty one and assign score, ExceHenl (7) Very good (6) Good (5)

1 2 Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair (2) Poor(1) at alteration. Score c»ie or doubte check and average.

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Rec^ t or no recovery (1)

Check all dislurtjances observed |

yi

mowing grazing ctearcutting selective cutting woody debris removal toxic pollutents

shrub/sapling removal hert>aceous/aqualic têd removal sedimentalton dredging farming nutrient enrichmenl

1


ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: |Rater(s): IDate:

H\ jP iny - ^^ ' ^ subtotal Ihis paga

0 ^1 Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max to pts. suptoiat Check atl that apply and score as indicaled.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth torest (10)

Mature foreêd wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributery wetland-unrestrided hydrdogy (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributery welland-restrided hydrotogy (5)



Known occurrence state/tederat threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbtrdâter fowl hat»tet or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetiand. See Question 1 QuaNtatJve Rating (-10)

e n Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. mat: 20 pts. sgbtolal 6a, Welland Vegetation Corr m unities.

Score all presenl using 0 lo 3 scate.

2. I

Jl

—

Aquatic bed

Emergent

Shrub

Forest

Mudflats Open water

Other

6b, horizontal (plan view) Interspersion.

Sêct orty one.

X

High (5)

Moderately high(4)

Moderate (3)

Moderately low (2)

Low(1)

None (0)


to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add

or deduct poinls for coverage

—

X




Neariy absent •=5% cover (0)

Absent (1)


0

1

2

3

Cover Scate

Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiôus area

Present and either comprises smalt part of wettand's

vegntation and is of moderale quality, or comprises a

significani part but is of tow quality

Present and eilher comprises signiftoant part of wetland's


part and is of high quatity


vegetaliwi and is of high quality

Narrative Descr^tion of Veqetation Quality

low

mod

high

Low spp diver»ty and/or predc»ninance of nonnative or

distoriiance tderant native species

Native spp are dominant component of the vegetetion.

although nonnative and/or disturbance tderant native spp

can also be present, and species diversity moderate to

moderately high, t>ut generaltyw/o presence of rare


A predominance of naiive spedes. wiUi nonnative spp

and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

absenl. and high spp diversily and oftea but not always,

the presence of rare, Ihreatened. or endangered spp

6d. MIcrdopography.


Vegetated hummucl^/tussuct<^

Coarse woody debris >15cm (Bin)

Stending dead >2San (IOin) dbh

Amphibian breeding pools i

H'\

Mudffet and Open Water Class Quality

0 1

2

3

Absent <i0.1 ha (0.247 acres)

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)


High 4ha [9.88 acres) or more

Microtopoqraphy Cover Scate

0 1

2

3

Absenl Present very small amounts or if more common

of margirial qualitv

Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest quatity or in small amounts of hiqhest quality

Present in moderate or greater amounis

and of highest qualily


Refer to the most recent OPM/l Score CalibraUon Repoit lor the scoring breahpalnis between wetland categofies at Ihe foBowing address: http:i/mvw.epa 5fate.otvus/dsw/40lAoi.htfnr


fe^

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating ^C4--vN^3c

Rater(s): /A^ U iDate: S ' -M^ \

Z> 3 Metric 1. Wetland Area (size). max 6 pis subtoisi Sefect One size dass and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts) 25 to <50 acres (10 1 to <20.2ha) (5 pis) 10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts) 3 to <10 acres (1.2 lo •:4ha) (3 pis) 0.3 to <3 acres (0 12 to <1.2ha) (2pts) 0 1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 lo <0-12ha) ( i pi)

' c max 14 pts.

max ^ (ris

; 20 pts.

'bH

(lf^¥-o i ^

<0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

15- 'ai

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use. 2a. Calculaie average buffer width. Seled cmly one and assign score. Do not double chedc.

VWDE. Buffers average SOm (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7) MEDIUM. Buffers average 2&m to <50m (82 to <164fl) around wetland perimeter (4) NARROW. Buffers average 10m to<25m(32ft to <82lt) around wettand perimeta-(1)

^ VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetfend perimeter (0)

2b- Intensity of surrounding land use. Selecl one or double check and average. VERY LOW. 2nd growth or dder forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area. etc. (7) LOW. CMd fidd (>10 y e a ^ , shrubland. young second growth forest. (5) MODERATELY HIGH. < ^ i a e m ^ . fenced pastore, pari<, conservation tillage, new fellow field. (3) HIGH. Urban, induslrfet. open pasiure. row cropping, mining, conslnjction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology. 3a. Sources of Waler Score atl ttiat ^p ly .

Higfi pH groundwater (5) ^ Other groundwater (3)

X Predpitetion (1) JK^ Seasonal/lnteTmittent suriace water (3)

Perennial surfece water (lake or stream) (5) Maximum water depth. Seted only one and assign score.

^0.7 (27.6in) (3) 0.4 to 0.7m (15,7 to 276in) (2) e0.4m(<15.7in)(1)

Modifications to natural hydrdogic regime. Score one or double check

3b.

3d 3c

Connectiwty. Score att that apply. 100 year floodplain (1) Between stream/lake and other human use (1) PartofwetlandAiplarKl (e.g. foresl), comfêx (1) Part of riparian or uptand coiridor (1)

Duration inundation/saturation. Soore one or dbl check. Sern\- to permanentty inundated/saturated (4} Regulariy inundated/saluraled (3)

El

y ^ Seasonally inundated (2) saturated inuFêr3Dcm(12in)(1)

36

None or none apparwit (12) Recovered (7) Recovering (3) Recent or no recovery (1)

5 •ZH

and average.

Check att disturtiances observed ditch tite dike

weir

stormwater input S

point source (nonstormwatef) niNng/grading road bed/RR track dradgii

other. M } ^ tyiOi'J

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development. 4d.

4b.

4C,

Substrate disturbance. Score one or doubfe check and average None or none awarenl (4)

2 Recovered (3) Recovering (2) Receni or no recovwy (1)

tetwtat development. Seled only one and assign score. ExceHent(7) Very good (6) Good (5)

>< Moderately good (4) Fair (3) Poor to fair {2} Poor (1)

Habitat alteration. Score one or doubte check and average.

None or none apparent (9) Recovered (6) Recovering (3) Recent or no reixvery (1)

ajblotal this page

Check att disturiaances observed

.Vc

mowing grazing . deareutting setective cutting woody debris removal toxic pdlulants

1

k

shnjb/sapting removal herbaceous/aqualk: bed removal sedimenteticm dredgpng fanning nulrient enrichment


ORAM V. S.O Field Form QuantUative Rating

Site: |Rater(s): Date:

^ 4 gi^vi/'O^'^ • stilBol^ tftis page

0 1>H Metric 5. Special Wetlands. max 10 pis subictai Ctiectt all that aj^ty and score as indicaled.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth torest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5}

t_ake Erie coastal/tributary viretland-unreslricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/lrit>utery wettand-restrided hydrology (5)

L^<e Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relict Wet Praires (10)

Known occurrence slate/federat threat^ted or erKlangered spedes (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fovtrf hatiifet or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitetive Raling (-10)

k "h^ Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography. max 20 pts. 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities.

Score ail present using 0 lo 3 scafe.

Aquatic bed

Emergît

Shrub

Forest

Mudflats

Open water

aher

3

6b. horizontal (plan view) Intersperôn.

Seled or^y one.

High (5)

Moderately htgh(4)

Moderate (3) Moderately low (2)

Low(1)

V None (0)


to Tabte 1 ORAM tong form for lisl. Add

°^ deitoct points for (xiverage




^ Neariy absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1)


0 1

2

3

Cover Scafe

Absent or comprises <:0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Present and eHher conprises small part of wettend's

vegetation and is of moderate quatity, or comprises a

significant part but is of low quality

Present and either ccHnprises significant part of wetland's

vegetetton and is of moderate quality or comprises a small

part and is of high quaNty

Present and comprises significant part, or more, of weiland's

vegetetion and is of high quality

Narrative Description of Vegelation Quality

tow

mod

high

Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnartive or

disturt)ance tolerant naiive species

Naiive spp are dominant component of tfie vegetetion,

atthough nonnative and/or disturbance toterant native spp

can also be present, and spedes diveiîty moderate to



A predominance erf native spedes, with nonnative spp

and/or dislurtjance toterant native spp absent or virtually

absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not atways,


6d. Microtopoâfrfiy.


Lai Vegetated hummucks/tussucks

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in)


/^phibian breeding pools

'hi


0 1

2

3

Absent <0,1 ha (0.247 acres]

Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Moderate 1 to <4ha [2.47 to 9.86 acres)

Hiqh 4ha (9.68 acres) or more

Microtopoqraphv Cover Scale

0 1

2

3


of marginal quality

Present in moderate amounts, bul not of highest quatily or in smatt amounts of highesi quatity

Presenl in moderate or greater amounts

and of highest quaHty


Refer to ins most recdnl ORAM Score Calibration Report lor me scoring breakpoints betweer wetiand categories at ihe lonowinQ address: hl4}7fwww.spa.sl3fe.oh.usMswMfl'V401 .litml

test revised 1 February 2001 jjm

http://www.spa.sl3fe.oh.usMswMfl'V401

APPENDIX C

QUALITY HABITAT EVALUATION (QHEI) STREAM CHANNEL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND TABLE

•

(]^l+-$O\0 Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index and Use Assessment Field Sheet QHEI Score:

stream & Location: ^ ^ s \ Bi^^^*-^ Ci/v^^Kjjfi. ^ ^ t / ^ - R ^ i ' O \ 0 R M : ,_ Date:Q5Jd_iJ ^ 0 1

Scorers Full Name & Afniiation: fÂii L - ^ ^ i ^ KJI-A S _ River Code: - - STORBT^: Lat/Long.: lo " " "^ — ^ * ^ — (NAD_83^decimal°l ' — ^ ^ ^ — ' * * — •

Office verified f-. location U

1] S U B S T R A T E Check OWLKTwo substrate TYPE BOXES, estimate % or note every type present

BEST TYPES D D BLDR/SLABS [10] • a BOULDER [9] D • CbBBLE [8] 130'GRAVEL [71

D D ÊPROCK [53

POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE n a HARDPAN [4J n n DETRITUS [3] • D MUCK [2] nasiLT[z] -ô to D D ARTIFICIAL [0]

(Score natural substrates; ignore N U M B E R O F B E S T T Y P E S l Q i o " " Tôê [2] s'"dge from point-sources)

Comments >3ôriess[0]

Check ONE {Or 2 & average) ORIGIN QUALITY

n LIMESTONE [1] D HEAVY [-2] a TILLS [1] D MODERATE [-1] Substrate D WETLAiypS [OJ ''**-' â«ORMAL [Oj 1 ? ^ " • HARDPANWJ DFREEJiJ I \ A BÂND?:CCÊ fO], "^Da:"""[J§XTENSiVgi:2I I J ^ URiPlfiAmi f ^ ^^^JWbDERATE[-1] M ^ m D LACC^TITRINE (OJ M ^^^^PIORMAL [0] ' ^ ^J^^ " ^ DSHAtE [ - i j ; n NOSE n l n COAL FINE? M

21 INSTREAM COVER Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal AMOUNT •* quality;2-Moderateamounts, but not of highest Quality or ir small amounts of highest „^ , -,»,_,« „ „

^ ' ^ CheckONE(Or2&avefa5te) quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large diameter log that Is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools. ,,• UNDERCUT BANKS [1] PQGL§t ;70Gifi [2] OXBOWS,BACKWATERS[1]

f - OVERHANGING VEGmATION [1] KCWPSWAQS [ i | AQUATfC MACROPHYTES [1] I SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1] BOULDIRS [1] I LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1] { ROOTMATS f1]

Comments

3] CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average) SINUOSITY DEVELOPMENT CHANNELIZATION STABILITY

tHieH[4] D ^CELLpNt.fj] n NOJslE[6] ^ HIGH^l

MODERATE [3j D GOOD [^ 'J2;;REC0VERED [4] J!BrMPDE( >!TE [2] U LOW [2] Sri'AIR[3] D REC0VERINGt31 Q 'lX>Wt\] D NONE [1] G POOR [1] D RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1j Comments

• EXTENSIVE >75%.{113

fMpPERATE 25-75% 17] SPARSE 5-<25% t3]

n NEARLY ABSENT <5%[1]

Channel Maximum

20

4] BANK EROSION AND RIPARIAN ZONE Check ONE in each category for EACH BANK {Or 2 per bank & average) River right looking downstream RIPARIAN W I D T H

* o i ^ E . - ^ ^ ' ' * ^ ® ' ^ ' ^ t l 6 WIDP > 50rn [4] ^^QBTTONE / LITTLE [3J Nn Q MODERATTE IQ-SOm [31

n n MODERATE [2] n'S*hARR5W'^5-10ml23 D D HEAVY/ SEVERE [1] D D VERY N/BiRROW < 5m Jl]

D O NONE [0] Comments

FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY FOREST, SWAMP [3q,'" • D SHRUB Of OLD F | ^ { 2 ] Q Qf

D a<||s|pEgrfiAiîw^?iFiELitt] • D l P ^ ^ ^ ^ i i n D PJEf|CE0l>^Ty>l&tlf " Indicate predominant land use(s} U D OPEN PASTURE, R6WCRGP [0] past 100m riparian. Riparian

5] POOL / GLIDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUALITY MAXIMUM DEPTH CHANNEL WIDTH Check ONE {ONLY!) \ ^ Check ONE (Or 2 & average) n > 1 m [6] J H P O O L WipjH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2\ D'0.7-<1m[4} D POOL WIDTHS RIFFLE WIDTH [1] D 64-<0.7m pS] n POOL WIDTH < RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

'^^J!-<0.4m [1] n V 0.2m [0]

Comments

CURRENT VELOCITY Check ALl-Jhat apply

n TORRENTIAL [-1] fe^LOy/ [1] ^ ^ a VERY FAST^pl D IHTERSTITI^ H ] ' ^ =AST PI " D iNT^RMITTEJirr [-2]

iODERATE [1] DJEDDIES ( M Indicate for reach - pools and nffles.

Recreation Potential Primary Contact

Secondary Contaci \ * IfWft

Pool / Current

Maximum 12

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population o f r i f f l e -ob l iga te s p e c i e s : Check ONE {Or 2 & average). DNO RIFFLE [metric=

RIFFLE DEPTH D BEST AREAS >10bni [2] D ^ S t AÊAS S-106fn{1]

^ ^ ^ E S t AREAS <5cnfi > ^ [metricsO]

Comments

RUN DEPTH RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEODEDNESS DMAXIMUM >5ppm [2] nSTABLE (e.g.,Cobble, Boulder) [2] DNONE[2]

^P5^BAXIliflliM < SObm [1] D MOD. STABLE (e.g., Laiê Gravel) [1] D LOW [J] "SJlNSTABLE (e.g.. Rne Gravel, Sand) [0] "' -pHTODERATE [0]

D EXTENSIVE [-1] Riffle h

Run Maximum

6] GRADIENTf^ y e ft/mi) DRAINAGE AREA

U VERY LOW-L0W [24]

D HliGH - EF^ HIGH [10^^

%POOL:( L p ) %GLIDE: (> t> ) Gradient

%RUN: ( " x o ) % R I F F L E : C v ^ ) Maximum

10

EPA 4520 06/16/06

fVl4'S0\4 v) ^

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation ln(dex Field Sheet QHEI Score:! (j? River Code: Date: Locatio.

Stream: I J j r^ff- ffMiS- O i ^

Scorers Ful l N a m e : j l ^ L 1: Affiliation: ol^S 1] SUBSTRATE (Check ONLY Two SubstrateTYPE BOXES; Estimate % present TYPE POOL RIFFLE POOL RIFFLE SUBSTRATE ORIGIN Da-BLOR/SLBSf10l '^Kt-GRAVEL (7] ^ O D D-BOULDER [9] " S M A N D [6] 9 5 -

nn-C0BBLE[81 _ £ _ ! £ n&BEDROCKlS] D D-HARDPAN [4] _ _ ^ D D-DETRITUS[31 DaMUCK[2] a n-ARTlF!ClAL[01 _ • n . C f i T ro i ^>rt NOTE Ignote Sludge Of^nafing

U-i>\l~ I l^J _iSW. _ p ^ ^ p^ j ^ Sources

SUBSTRATE QUALITY Check ONE (OR 2 & AVERAGE)

D-SILT HEAVY [-2] NP-SILT MODERATE [-1] ^ - S I L T NORMAL [0]

NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES: D-4 or More [2] (High Quality Only, Score 5 or >) " T O or Less [0]

i&Check ONE (OR 2 & AVERAGE)

H O a -LIMESTONE [1 ] SILT _ ^ a--nLLS[i] Z> a -WETLANDS[0]

D-HARDPAN [0] D-^LTFREEfl j_ •^^f-SAi^STOlÊ [OJ EMBEDDED D-E)a-ENSIVE [-2] D -RIP/RAP [0] NESS: D -MODERATE [-1] n -LACUSTRINE [0] N J ^ Q R M A L [0]

•-SHALE [-1] D-NONE [1] _PC0AL FINES [-2]

Substrate

IX Max 20

COMMENTS 21 INSTREAM COVER (Give each cover type a score of 0 to 3; see back for instructions)

(Structure) TYPE: Score All That Occur

I UNDERCUT BANKS [1] ^ P 0 0 L 5 > 70 cm [2] OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1] ÔVERHANGING VEGETATION [1 ] ^ROOTWADS {1 ] AQUATIC WACROPHYTES [1J _!LSHALL0WS (IN SLOW WATER) [1] ^BOULDERS [1] /LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

AMOLfMT: fCheck OI^LY One or

ROOTMATS [1] COMMENTS: 3] CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY: (Check

SINUOSITY DEVELOPMENT CHANNELIZATION D - HIGH [4] a - EXCELLENT [7] O - NONE [6] D - MODERATE [3] D - GOOD [5]

" ^ L O W [2] ^ F A I R [3] D-N0NE[1] a-POOR [1]

check 2 and AVERAGE) n-EXTENSIVE > 75% [11] • - MODERATE 25-75% [7]

^llBc SPARSE 5-25% [3] n - NEARLYA6SENT< 5%{1J

ONLY One PER Category OR check 2 andAVERAGE ) STABIUTY MODIFICATIONS/OTHER D-HIGH [3] D-SNAGGING D

Cover

{Vlax20

Channel

IMPOUND. ^ - RECOVERED [4] ^^J^ÔDERATE [2] • - RELOCATION Q - ISUNDS jHfRECOVERING [3] D - LOW [1 ] • • CANOPY REMOVAL Q - LEVEED D - RECENT OR NO O - DREDGING Q - BANK SHAPING RECOVERY [1) n - ONE SIDE CHANNEL ATOOtnCATIONS

Max 20

COMMENTS: 4]. RIPARIAN ZONE AND BANK EROSIOKcheck ONE box per bank or check 2 and AVERAGE per bank) ? River Right Looking Downstream P

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PUIN QUALITY (PAST tOO Meter RIPARtAN) BANK EROSION L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant Per Bank) D D - WIDE > SOm [4] D D-FOREST, SWAMP [3] D^MOOERAT^ 10-50m [3] O ^ H R U B OR OLD HELD [2] D P - NARROW 5-10 m [2] *^D-REStDENTIAL,PARK,NEW RELD [ I ]

' p p - VERV NARROW <5 mff j O D-FENCED PASTURE EH DD-NONE[0] COMWENTS:

L R L R (Per Bank) Ripanan

OQCONSERVATION TILUGE (1] ^JS^-NONE/LITTLE [3] f ^ " a a -URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0] U D-MODERATE [2] o L l M D • OPEN PASTURE,ROWCR0P [0\ U n-HEAVY/SEVERE[1^3^ ""^ a a-MINtl*3/CONSTRUCnON [OJ

5.IP00UGLIDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUAUTY

> $

MAX. DEPTH (Check 1 ONLY!) D - >1mt6] n - 0.7-1m[43

)HCo.4-D.7m[2] b - 0.2-0.4m [1] a - <0.2m[POOL=01 COMMENTS:.

MORPHOLOGY (Check 1 or 2 & AVERAGE) OOL WIDTH > RlFaE WIDTH [2]

• -POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1] a -POOL WIDTH < RIFFLE W. [0]

CURRENT VELOCITY f POOLS & RIFFLES!] (Check AH That Apply)

D -EDDIES[1] D -T0RRENTIAL[-1] 'FAST[1 ] D -lNTERSTmAL[-l]

)DERATE (1] n-INTERMITTENT[-2] .aw 11] D -VERY FAST[t]

Pool/ Current

Ql Max 12

RIFFLE DEPTH D-"eest Areas > 10 cm [2]

^ Best Areas 5-10 cm[1] D - Best Areas < 5 cm

[RIFFLE=D] COMMENTS:

CHECK ONE OR CHECK 2 AND AVERAGE RUN DEPTH RIFFLE/RUN SUBSTRATE RIFaE/RUN EMBEDDEDNESS • -MAX>50[2J O-STABLE (e.g.,Cobbte, Boulder) [2] D-NONE [2]

•^RfMAX < 50[1] )*MOD. STABLE (e.g.,Large Gravel) [1] " " ^ L O W [1] )^NSTABLE (Fine Gravel.Sand) [0] D - MODERATE [0]

D-E>aENSIVE[-1] a - NO RIFRE [Metric=0)

Riffle/Run

3.5 MaxB

Gradient

6] GRADIENT (fUmi): %(/^.DRAINAGEAREA{sq.mi.> : 0 r \ %POOL: 1 16 I %GUDE

% R I F F L E P ^ ^ % R U N : \ ~ S W

Max 10

EPA 4520 06/24/01

^^J3d DDDD DDD D D ^ D D D n

ispe

cted

Sou

rce

heck

All

Tha

t A

p N

o U

^dw

s\i

LIve

stc

Siiv

icult

Con

stru

ct

Urb

an R

un

CS

S

ubur

tjan Im

pa

Min

C

hann

ellz

at

Rip

aria

n R

emo

Land

l N

atL

Dai

he

r F

low

Alte

rat

her;

5 0 0 0 oB

IS a E

1 LU

^ z

1 ^

• ^

fll

J i

d)

D.

•2

1 DC o> c

E <5§ ^

c o a. 0

>. (0 0

1 CO

t 0 .2

i

c

0

s 0

to a.

P u- a.

E 5

ll LO

J =

g o £ ' • = P 01 r O.C:

il 1^ S 5

1"" C {0 £ <D

III raCQ

J 5 5

i E

g Q

0 ]

11 | o < Su:

c 0

J

^ - i

i

1

""*"

4 = lls=,„f 1 ffl C O ' 1

*- - 1^ 1 ^s 1 f ^ l ( S ^ 1

1 "" ^ II

mi ] Jj" 1 3 |

If i 1 1 % 8

l l 1 i ^ 1 t ! ^

.2 0

h -

1 £ £• S c' " i_-<5-a (D n £ « gl >, g u . ipU.

«S S I J2I

M D D n n n

2

1 2 > i

i c

. 0

S ta

n n

v^

^ If -sO\5 ^ u } ^ ^

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Field Sheet QHEI Score S' River Code: Date:

RM: ^ LqcaponLMi

Streatn:! K ^ S - t ^ ? ^ »^hJp:} ( ^ t A ^ i M i

Affiliation: IMR 5 Scorers Full Name 1] SUBSTRATE (Check ONLY Two SubstrateTYPE BOXES; Estimate % present

TYPE POOL RIFFLE POOL RIFFLE SUBSTRATE ORIGIN

D D-BLDR /SLBSI10]

D D-BOULDER [9]

D £ ^ : O B B L E ( 8 ] I i i a 6-HARDPAN [4] dn-MUCK[21

SILT [21 5K-

SUBSTRATE QUALITY

Check ONE (OR 2 ft AVERAGE)

D-SILT HEAVY [-2]

^&< ILT MODERATE [-1] Substrate

D -SILT NORWIAL [0] '

> ^ '

NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES: (High Qpality Only, Score 5 or >)

COMMENTS

DtS-GRAVEL [7J Q 0 _ Check ONE (OR 2 a AVERAGE)

D ^ ^ N D [ 6 i ai3_ D-LIMESTONE [1 ] SILT DaBEDR0CK[5] D-TILLS [1] D DDETRITUSP] D -WETLANDS[0] DaARTIRaAL[01___ D-HARDPAN [0] ° i l ^ I f ' ' I E XI] _ F ^ P S ^ J ! ^ ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ' ' ' ^ ^-SANDSTONE [0] EMBEDDED O-EXTENSIVE [-2]

D-RIP/RAP [0] NESS: fckMODERATE [-1] D4 or Atore [2] D -LACUSTRINE [0] D -NORMAL [0]

or Less [0] O -SHALE [-1] D -NON E [1] P-COAL RNE5 [-2]

^ , Max 20

2] INSTREAM COVER (Give each cover type a score of 0 to 3; see back for instructions) I (Structure) TYPE: Score All That Occur /

UNDERCUT BANKS [IJ * PQOLS> 70 cm [2] " OXBOWS. BACKWATERS [ t ]

.ROOTWADS [1]

.BOULDERS [1]

X AQUATIC AAACROPHYTES [1]

JJ-LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

AMOUNT: fCheck ONLY One or

. check 2 and AVERAGE)

)B(Ê)a£NSIVE>^%[ff]

Cover

D-MODERATE 25-75% [7] D-SPARSE 5-25% [3] D - NEARLY ABSENT < 5%[1]

ONLY One PER Categoiy OR check 2 andAVERAGE )

90 Max 20

Channel

ÔVERHANGING VEGETATION [1 ] X-SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1] XROOTMATS [1 ] COMA ENTS:

31 CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY: {Check SINUOSITY DEVELOPMENT CHAhS EUZATlON STABIUTY MODIFICATIONS/OTHER

Jl^HIGH [4] D-EXCELLENT [7] D-NONE [6] ^ P C H I G H [3] D-SNAGGING D-IMPOUND D - MODERATE [3] "p^GOOD [5] ^ f RECOVERED [4] D - MODERATE [2] D - RELOCATION D - ISUNDS D - LOW [2] " D - FAIR [3] D - RECOVERING [3] D - LOW [1 ] • - CANOPY REMOVAL D - LEVEED n - NONE [1 ] • - POOR [1 ] D - RECENT ORNO D - DREDG ING D - BANK SHAPING

RECOVERY [1 ] D - ONE SIDE CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS COMMENTS: 4], RIPARIAN ZONE AND BANK EROSIOKcheck ONE box per bank or check 2 and AVERAGE per bank) ? River Right Looking Downstream ?

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PUIN QUALITY fPAST 100 Meter RIPARIAN) BANK EROSION L R (Per Bank) L R (/Wost Predomirânt Per Sank) L R \ K ^ ^ ^^®'" '^'^^ DD- WIDE > SOm [4] D POOREST, SWAMP [3] D D IONSERVATION TILUGE [1] )M[ÔNE/LITTLE t 3 j [ n , ^ DtlyMODERATE 10-50m [3] D DSHRUB OR OLD HELD [2] D D -URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0] D D -MODERATE [2]

Max 20

Riparian

'^^f-VARROW5-10m[2] ^^J^RESIDENTIAURARK.HEW FIELD [1] D D-OPEN RASTURE,ROWCROP [1)| D D-HEAVY/SEVEREII]^^^ ""O D D - VERY NARROW <5 m[1] t l D-FENCED PASTURE [1] D D-MINING/CONSTRUCTION [0] DDNONEIO] COAWAENTS:

5. ]P00UGLIDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUALITY

_MAX. DEPTH

(Check 1 ONLYI)

D ' >1nn[6]

• ^ 0.7-1 m [4]

^ ' 0.4-0.7m[2]

D ' 0.2-0.4m [1J

D ' < 0,2m [POOLÔ] COMMENTS:

MORPHOLOGY

(Check 1 or 2 & AVERAGE)

SiJ^-POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

Tl-POOL WIDTH = RlFaE WIDTH [1]

D -POOL WIDTH < RlFaE W. [OJ

CURRENT VELOCITY f POOLS & RIFFLES!]

(Check All That Apply)

D -EDDtESfl] D-T0RRENTIAL[-1]

D -FAST[1] D -INTERSTrnAL[-1]

^p^MODERATE [1] a-INTERMITTENT[-2)

^ ^ O W f l J a-VERY FASTfl]

CHECK ONE OR CHECK 2 AND AVERAGE

Pool/ Current

1 Max 12

Riffle/Run

RjFFLE DEPTH n-*Best Areas >10 cm [1] D-Best Areas 5-10 cm[1]

>0^ Best Areas < 5 cm [RIFaE=0]

COMMENTS: V \ ^

RUN DEPTH

D-MAX > 50 [2]

" • ^ M A X < 50[1]

M^}

RIFFLE/RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE/RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

D-STABLE (e.g.,Cobble, Boulder) [Z] D-NONE [2]

D-MOD. STABLE (e.g.,Large Gravel) [1] D - LOW [1]

^pi^JNSTABLE (Fine GraveLSand) [OJ D - MODERATE [Oj

D-EXTENSIVE [-1]

J 5 ? j NO RIFFLE [MetricÔJ

MaxB

Gradient

6 ] GRADIENT (ft/ml) DRAINAGE AREA (sq.mi.) M '-a«BHFMSnW»H»)WB#<IIOtf9)H

%POOL: l i ^ O %RIFFLEr

%GLIDE:| %RUN:

^ O WlailO

Mb

EPA 4520 06/24/01

c

• Q .

X UJ

Ti £ CQ

I I ?

c (0

I a: m 0)

CC Ol

a

i CO

o

^ « ^ O m

<B f K "K _S is O

> .£* fli c a> t j a o i_ c •— ^ S

E . ^ « 0 m^-

•

Ai-f -<gO\L:

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Field Sheet QHEI Score: V^5 RM: River Code:

Date: Location:^ fv Scor&rs Full Name t l Â L>^ m ^

Stream: rfc?

(Mk ^~QW ^-^:. .-^

: • . : # •

,-:4

Affiliation: \A^S 1] SUBSTRATE (Check ONLY Two SubstrateTYPE BOXES; Estimate % p rên t TYPE POOL RIFFLE ^^*^*- ^'FFLE SUBSTRATE ORIGIN

X c ^ ^ f ' A V E L ' p l ? ^ 9 ^ 5 — C ^ e c k ONE (OR 2 a AVERAGE) SUBSTRATE Q

T M nP-BLDR/SLBS[101 D D -BOULDER [9] _ D ^ O B B L E [8] % _ H Q L D D-HARDPAN [4] aD-MUCKl2]

^ ^ S t L T [ 2 ] kLQ.

D D-SAND I6| D DBEDR0CKI5] D D-DETRITUS[3] DD-ARTlFtCIALlOL

^5 S I L T

NOTE: Ignore Sludge Originaling From Point Soirees

NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES; (High CluaUty Only, Score 5 or >)

COMMENTS

^ 5 or More [21 D 3 or Less [0]

D -LIMESTONE [1 ] . D-TILLS [1] . D -WETLANDS[0]

D-HARDPAN 10] . "^-SANDSTONE [0] EMBEDDED - D-RIP/RAP [0] NESS:

D-LACUSTRINE [0] D-SHALE [-1] _DCOALFINE5[-2]

Check ONE (OR 2 a

D-SILTjy[E53i^

« ^ T N D-SILT

D-A«)DERAT^--i3' ;^-NQIÂL [Oij D - | # I E [1]

Max 20

AMOUNT: fCheck ONLY One or 2] INSTREAM COVER (Give each cover type a score of 0 to 3; see back for instructions) (Structure) TYPE: Score All That Occur check 2 and AVERAGE)

UNDERCUT BANKS [1] POOLS> 70 cm [2] OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1j D - EXTENSIVE > 75% [11] ÔVERHANGING VEGETATION [1) ROOTWADS [1 ] A Q U A T I C MACROPHYTES [1] '> l | ^ - MODERATE 25-75% P ]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1] BOULDERS [1] _2.L0GS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1] D - SPARSE 5-25% [3] J^ROOTMATS [1] COMMENTS: • - NEARLY ABSENT < 5%[13 3] CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY: (Check ONLY One PER Category OR check 2 andAVERAGE )

SINUOSTTY DEVELOPMENT CHANNELIZATION STABIUTY MODIFICATIONS/OTHER D - HIGH [4] D - EXCELLENT [7] Q - NONE [6] D - HIGH [3] D • SNAGGING D - IMPOUND.

V ^ MODERATE [3] " t a j GOOD [5] ^ RECOVERED [4] ) a ^ MODERATE [2] D - RELOCATION D - ISUNDS ^ ^ L O W [2] yEC- FAIRt33 D - RECOVERING [3] D - LOW [1] ^ C A N O P y REMOVAL D - LEVEED

D - NONE [1] D - POOR [1] D - RECENT OR NO D - DREDGING D - BANK SHAPING

Cover

i l Max 20

Channel

115 Max 20

RECOVERY [1] D - O t^ SIDE CHAHt4EL MODIFICATIONS COMMENTS: 4], RIPARIAN ZONE AND BANK EROSION:check ONE box per bank or check 2 and AVERAGE per bank) ? River Right Looking Downstream P . RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PUIN OUALITY IPAST 100 Meter RIPARIAN) BANK EROSION

L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant Per Bank) L R L R (Per Bank) D D - WIDE > 50m [4] Xp-FOf^ST, SW4MP [3] D DCONSERVATION TILUGE [1] ^^^rtlONE/LITTLE [3] [ f \

Riparian

D D -URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0] D D -MODERATE [2] " ^ D - MODERATE 10-50m [3 ] ' D 1 } < H R U B OR OLD HELD [2] D p ^ NARROW 5-10 m [2] D DRESIDENT1AL,PARK,NEW FIELD [1] D D -OPEN PASTURE.ROWCROP [OJ D D -HEAVY/SEVEREEI]'"* ^° DD-VERlf NARROW <5m[13 DD-NONE[0] COMMENTS:

D D-FENCED PASTURE [1] D D-MINING/CONSTRUCTION [0]

5.]P00L/GUDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUALITY MAX. DEPTH

(Check 1 ONLYI) D- >lm[6] D- 0.7-1 m [4]

X ' 0.4^.7m [2] D- 0.2'0.4m [1] D- < 0.2m [POOL=0]

MORPHOLOGY (Check 1 or 2 & AVERAGE)

^yC-POQl WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2] D -POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1J D -POOL WIDTH < RlFaE W. [0]

COMMENTS:,

CURRENT VELOCITY r POOLS & RIFFLES!] (Check All That Apply)

D-EDDIES[1] a-T0RRENTIAL[-1] ^-FAST[1] D-IHTERSTrnAL[-1] ^MODERATE [1] D-INTERMITrENTI-2] P^LOW [1] D -VERY FAST[1]

Pool/ Current

22 Max 12

RIFFLE OEPTH D -'Best Areas >10 cm [2]

^ - Best Areas 5-10 cm[1] D - Best Areas < 5 cm

[RIFFLE=0] COMMENTS:

CHECK ONE OR CHECK 2 AND AVERAGE RUN DEPTH RIFFLE/RUN SUBSTRATt RIFFLE/RUN Eft\BEDDEDNESS D-^MAX>50[2] ^ ^ T A B L E (e.g.,Cobble, Boulder) [2] D-NONE [2]

p M O D . STABLE (e.g.Ûrge Gravel) [1] ^ " ^ n ^ V t [1] D-UNSTABLE (Fine Gravel.Sand) [0] D-MODERATE [0]

D-EXTENSIVE [-1] D - NO RlFaE [Atetric«01

Riffle/Run

' ^ A ^ A X < 50[1]

H5 MaxB

Gradient

6] GRADIENT (ft/ml): ^ 0 .DRAINAGE AREA (sq mi.) ai '"BtSttf»aai>^'stlMlmsBanaHglHaaiipfiort»popiiUti9ilottM»-^llaa»tptcUa

%POOL: r W l % G U D E | % R I F F L E ^ ^ % R U h l no

m Max 10

EPA 4520 06/24/01

L >43aDDDDEinnb:DDDDDDD . j l

:ed

Sou

rces

o'

All

Tha

t App

ly

Non

e In

dust

rial

WW

TP

Live

stoc

k S

ilvic

ultu

re

Con

stru

ctio

n U

rban

Run

off

CS

Os

irtia

n Im

pact

s M

inin

g

hann

eliz

atio

n ria

n R

emov

al

Land

fills

N

atur

al

Dam

s lo

w A

ltera

tion

s^ 1 " a ^ J S"Jc w 0 ^ 1 «9. 5 o b : <o O • «

•(0 ns S o .

£

j UJ

1

S" £ fD

^ n> 1

1 o. ^ j r

QZ.

E 00 J2

1

1 c

a o

l l i o 1

1

f o ^ 1

8 c ra •5 b

ra

S ' (A

1 ^ ^

CO

. - >

.c

i-£i5 UJ

f l i f< ra 2 x : 3-S

IS

ill E g j

§£

li 5 E ^ JZ

l l ffl

?i |S ffl

-?

J

£ 3 -

- 1

£ o

Vr>.

"T

Tl " ^

IP S • ^ 1 §^ 1

^^ 1

r-T —

" 1 5 «i

Jjco 1 M

If o « c-So. E

i S _ T3

E>. OJ c £ O LU O

£&• w o £>• ffl o

E

c o O

55

D D D D

O >

ffi CO

t„ k. P - — —

"i;; X i £ = 3 ^ 4 : ; I ffl m (0 I g,.g

> .P" fll C ® tT i

Soofsfs I illIf îllll ^ OS c c - s S $

S2 c S -o ^-o .£

o o

•

AH-son ,.

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Field Sheet QHEI Score ^5-^

m/.o\ River Code: __ RM:__ S\ Date: LocationL pi\tl Scorers Full Name:. J l m ^ J d J M Affiliation: 1] SUBSTRATE (Check ONLY Two SubstrateTYPE BOXES: TYPE POOL RIFFLE POOL RIFFLE SUBSTRATE ORIGIN

"uftr;;; Estimate % present

DO^RAVELl?! t ^ 55_Check ONE (OR Z a AVERAGE)

D 9«AND [6] / ^ 2 $ D -LIMESTONE [1 ] SILT: DDBEDR0CK[5)^::: D-TILLS[1] D DDETRfTUS[3] D -WETLANDS[0] Da-ARTIFICtALIOL__ D-HARDPAN [0] S f p S ' S i S S ^ ' ^ ' ^ ' * " ^ ^-SANDSTONE [0} EMBEDDED ^XTENSIVE [-2]

J D-RIP/RAP [0] NESS: DÔDERATE [-1] NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES: y t or More [2]., D -LACUSTRINE [0] D -NORMAL [0]

D D-BLDR SLBS|10| DD-B0ULDER[9] . ^ ^ DD-COBBLE[8] ' b ^ f ) • D-HARDPAN [4 i DD-MUCK[2]

S1LTI2J " ~ p y ^ ^

(High Quality Onty, Score 5 or >)

SUBSTRATE QUALITY CheckpNE (OR I & AVERAGE) ^^SsSILTHEAVYR]

D-SILT MODERATE [-1] D-SILT NORMAL [0]

_ D:SILTFR_EE£1J

Substrate

Max 20

COMMENTS 2] INSTREAM COVER

(Structure)

JD-COAL FINES [-2]. (Give each cover type a score of 0 to 3: see back for instructions)

TYPE: Score All That Occur AMOUNT: fCheck ONLY One or

UNDERCUT BANKS |1] LOVERHANGING VEGETATION [1] LSHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) (1] _R00TAWiTS [1] COMMENTS:,

POOLS> 70 cm [2] ROOTWADS [1] BOULDERS (1]

3] CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY: (Check SINUOSITY DEVELOPMENT D - HIGH [4] D - EXCELLENT [7] D - MODERATE [3] • - GOOD [5]

^;p:^L0W[2] ^ FAIR [3] D-N0NE[1] 9 < P 0 0 R [ 1 ]

COMMENTS:

check2and AVERAGE) OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [I) D - EXTENSIVE > 75% [11] AQUATIC MACROPHYTES (1] D - MODERATE 25-75% [7]

I LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS (IJ "^«0PARSE 5-25% [3] D - NEARLY ABSENT < 5%[1 ]

ONLY One PER Category OR check 2 andAVERAGE ) CHANNELIZATION STABILITY MODnCATIONS/OTHER D - NONE [6] D - HIGH [3] D - SNAGGING D - IMPOUND.

' i S ^ RECOVERED [4] D - MODERATE [2] D - RELOCATION D - ISUHDS D - RECOVERING [3] N j ^ L O W [T] D - CANOPY REMOVAL D - LEVEED

Cover

m Max 20

Channel

5 Max2lJ

D - RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

DREDGING • - BANK SHAPING ONE SIDE CHANNEL MODIRCATIONS

4). RIPARIAN ZONE AND BANK EROSIOKcheck ONE box per bank or check 2 and AVERAGE per bank) f River Right Looking Downstream ? RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY [PAST 100 Meter RIPARIAN) BANK EROSION

L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant Per Bank) L R L R (Per Bank) Riparian

D DCONSERVATION TILUGE [1] "^^ t fNONE/LITTLE [3] D D -URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0] ^T^^ÔOERATE [2]

•> D D - WIDE > SOm [4] D DFOREST, SWAMP [3] D 9 < M 0 D E R A T E 10-50m [3] D S H R U B OR OLD FIELD [2]

VqT3-NARROW 5-10 m [2] * ^ DRESIDENTIAL.PARK.NEW FIELD [1] D D OPEN PASTURE.ROWCRQP (Cf) D D-HEAVY/SEVEREfl]'^^'* ""^ • D- VERY NARROW <5 m[1] • D FENCED PASTURE (1] D D-MINING/CONSTRUCTION [0] n o - N O N E [0] COMMENTS:

5.]P00L/GLfDE AND RIFFLE/RUN OUALITY MAX. DEPTH

(Check 1 ONLY!) D - >1m[6] D - 0.7-1 m [4] D - 0.4-0.7m [2]

^ 0 . 2 - 0 . 4 m [1] D - <0.2m[POOL=0]

MORPHOLOGY V (Check 1 or 2 & AVERAGE) JSÔOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2] D-POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1) D -POOL WIDTH < RIFFLE W. [0]

CURRENT VELOCITY r POOLS & RIFFLES!] (Check All That Apply)

n -EDDIESff ] D -TORRENTIALf-tJ ^ F A 5 T [ 1 ] U -IMTERSTITl AL[-1 ]

^MODERATE [1] D-INTERMITTENT{-2] " ^ S L O W [1] D -VER^ FASTCI]

COMMENTS:.

Pool/ Current

ffl Max 12

RIFFLE DEPTH D -'Best Areas >10 cm [2] n - Best Areas 5-10 cm[1]

' ^ - Best Areas < 5 cm [RIFFLE=01

COAWENTS:

CHECK ONE OR CHECK 2 AND AVERAGE Riffle/Run

RUN DEPTH D-MAX > 5012]

"^d-AWX<50[1]

RIFFLE/RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE/RUN EMBEDDEDNESS DSTABLE (e.g.,Cobble, Boulder) [2] D-NONE [2] DMOD. STABLE (e.g.,Large Gravel) [1] D-LOW [1]

^^NSTABLE (Fine Gravel,Sand) [0] D - MODERATE [0] Nqj*EXTENSIVE [-1]

D- NO RlFaE [Atetric=0]

^ Max 8

Gradient

, : ^ _ 6] GRADIENT (ft/mi): 0 ^ DRAINAGE AREA fsq.mi) : h . ? ) ^ %POOL: r i ^ n % G L I D E : r p O n Max 10

%RIFFLEf|F~| %RUN: [[

EPA 4520 06/24/01

^>.:.Da DDDD DDD fi'DDDDDa

^ e ^ ^ t o r a c - g o ^ S r a

ra C O o o

is Q. X LU

>-l 2

CO

C 0) 10

Q.

,E "a £ ffl

CO

c c ra ro O ra

IE

5 OJ

<

«} «

OO

s. a>ra

UJ

u.

i| o « u K

ra CQ

w ^ ra

E ra

raT>

5

II O rt c-

mer

al (n

ty

dam

p

pstre

am

^g f a . 1 . 01 UJ o % E £• 5 i-

1 8

"K

.. i_' S-o a.<5 ffro

Is S

tre

tota

lly

Is th

er

How

F

Is T

he

How

F

U O D D D D

§

o 5 ^ O

Q

D D

^

§5 R •D

•55 > ^ ^ ^ ^

O 0) g ffi (DiS

III • - ' s : "B -

• c«^ c iS E ^

> .S* nj c 0) L--1

I - t H- S O m t_

iTJiJ P.Z. £ *- "S o fe" iillfl c ^ 8 Jt= t c to

§ T 3 S ^ . .Sg-

t3 s c c j i ^ ffl

AW-sC)^> Ui tl

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Field Sheet QHEI Score: >i River Code: Date :A i l -<^

RM: Locatjoa: f h ^ S f

Stream: i K / ^ - O ^ X

Scorers Full Name: flt^ u J k ^ Affiliation: UR.^ 1] SUBSTRATE (Check ONLY Two SubstrateTYPE BOXES; Estimate % present TYPE POOL RtFFt^ POOL RIFFLE SUBSTRATE ORIGIN D D-BLDR/SLBSF101 XID'-GRAVEL (TJ 2 i ^ 25-Check ONE (OR 2 & AVERAGE) DD-BOULDERJ91 J E 5 1^p!ÂNDI6] V > 5_0 D-LIMESTONE [1 ] SILT D D-COBBLE [8] J H M S D D-BEDROCKfS] D TILLS [1] D D-HARDPAN [4] D D-DETRITUS[31 2 ^ D -WETLANDS[0] DD-MUCK[21 aQ-SILT[2]

SUBSTRATE QUALITY Check ONE (OR 2 a AVERAGE)

D-SILT HEAVY[-2] D-SILT MODERATE [-1]

" ^ - S i L T NORAWL [0]

Substrate

^ i a . D D-ARTIFICIALIOL NOTE: Ignore Sludge Originating From Poim Sources

NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES: S g j or More [21 (High Quality Onty, Score 5 or >) Q-? or Less [0] COMMENTS ^ _ ^

. D-HARDPAN [0] 9 i lL I fREE l U _ ^-SANDSTONE [0] EMBEDDED D-EXTENSIVE [-2] . D-RIP/RAP [03 NESS: D-MODERATE [-1]

D -UCUSTRINE [0] "^-NORMAL [0] D-SHALE[-1] D-NONE [1] Jl-C0ALFINES[-2].

15 Max 20

2] INSTREAM COVER (Give each cover type a score of 0 lo 3; see back for instructions) (Structure) TYPE: Score All That Occur

. UNDERCUT BANKS [1 ] POOLS* 70 cm [2] ÔVERHANGING VEGETATION [1] ROOTWADS [1] _L_SHAaOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1] BOULDERS [1] i_R0OTMAT5 [1] COMMENTS:

AMOUNT; fCheck ONLY One or

OXBOWS. BACKWATERS [1] ^^QUATIC I CftOPHYTES [1] SZLOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS 11]

3] CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY: (Check ^NUOSITY DEVELOPMENT v CHAtWEUZATK)N W H I G H [ 4 ] D - EXCELLENT [7] J^H^NONE [6] D-MODERATE [3] D-LOW [2] D-NONE [13

COMMENTS:

^ G O O D [5] D-FAIR [3] D-P00R[1]

check 2 and AVERAGE) W E X T E N S I V E > 7 5 % [ 1 1 ]

* • - MOISRATE 25-75% [7] D-SPARSE 5-25% [3] D- NEARLY ABSENT < 5ilS(1]

ONLY One PER Category OR check 2 andAVERAGE ) STABIUTY M(g)inCAT10NS/OTHER

^:l^HIGH [3] D - SNAGGING D - IMPOUND.

Cover

ao Max 20

Channel

D-RECOVERED [4] D-RECOVERING [3] D - RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

MODERATE [2] LOW [1]

D- RELOCATION D- (SUNOS D - CANOPY REMOVAL D - LEVEED D - DREDGING D - BANK SHAPING D - ONE SIDE CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS

)2 Max 20

4]. RIPARIAN ZONE AND BANK EROSIOKcheck ONE box per bank or check 2 and AVERAGE per bank) 9 River Right Looking Downstream P RIPARIAN WIDTH

L R (Per Bank) DD-WIDE >50m[4] D D - MODERATE 10-50m [3]

. DD-NARROW 5-10 m [2] \ (2^VERY NARROW <5 m[1]

DD-NONE[0] COMMENTS:

aOOD PULN OUALITY (PAST 100 Meter RIPARtAN) I R (Most Predominant Per Bank) L R D DFOREST, SWAMP [3] D DCONSERVATION TILUGE [1] D DSHBtJB OR OLD HELD [2] D D -URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

BANK EROSION L R (Per Bank) DD-NONE/UTTLE [3] D D-MODERATE [2]

Riparian

^ IDEhrB L.PARK.NEW FIELD f l l D D-OPEN PASTURE.ROWCRQP [Cg D D-HEAVY/SEVERE[1] '' 1 ^

D D-FENCED RfcSTURE [1] D D-MINING/CONSTRUCTION [0]

5.]POOL/GLIDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUALITY MAX. DEPTH

(Check 1 ONLY!) p - >1m[6] D- 0.7-1 m [4]

Na< 0.4-0.7m [2] D- 0.2-0.4m[1] p - <0.2m[PlDOL»0] COMMENTS:.

MORPHOLOGY (Check 1 or 2 & AVERAGE)

D -POOL WIDTH > Rin=LE WIDTH [2] ' 'yiÔDL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

D -POOL WIDTH < RIPaE W. [OJ

CURRENT VELOCITY f POOLS & RIFFLES!] (Check All That Apply)

D-EDDIES[1] D-T0RRENTIAL[-1] ^ ^ F A S T f l ) D-INTERSTITIALX-I]

^P^DERATE [1] D-INTERMITTENT[-2] "QifLOWtll D-VERYFASTtU

Pool/ Current

E Max 12

RIFFLE DEPTH D -*Best Areas >10 cm [2]

" ^ Best Areas 5-10 cm[1] • - Best Areas < 5 cm

[RIFFLE=0] COMMENTS;

CHECK ONE OR CHECK 2 AND AVERAGE RUN DEPTH RIFFLE/RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE/RUN EMBEDDEDNESS D-MAX>50[2] D-STABLE (e.g.,Cobble, Boulder) [2] D-NONE [2]

"ÔfMAX < 50[1] " ^ 9 4 ^ 0 . STABLE (e.g.,Urge Gravel) [1] " ^ LOW [1] aUNSTABLE (Fine Gravel.Sand) [0] B - MODERATE [0]

D-EXTENSIVE [-1] D- NO R»FFL£ [Metric=OJ

Riffle/Run

K MaxB

Gradient

6] GRADIENT (ft/mi): ^

^

.DRAINAGE AREA (sq.mi.) 0M% largm aimugh (n s t^ io i t a popalulm ot niB».0CW» gpaclM

%POOL: I j ^ I %GLIDE:| % R I F F L E f ^ ~ | %RUN

I£ Max 10

LM. ePA4520 06/24/01

sÂ^DDDDDCianâaDDDa , 1|

iPil^liPsf I l l l l i l »H - -'S5g| § p <

l l 1 "S EJ 55 go f l S a. £

h

UJ

!!=

2

^ £ ffl

CO 0)

33

o S

Q .

Q: 1 c ^ E

eg »

^ :

:

;

^ 1 1

*l

' •

Q-O ,

>t 1

§• c ra O

li 1 \f

\i

8

1

L: ra o 1

(0

^ Q.

•g E* i l ^ 1

j w 5

1

1° S"-S Is UJ OtJZ

l l '1 u.< iS s_

cCl ra

If Wjs j , £

il 11^

5' E 1

I* toQ S

<a O.C

1 g-1 <u

i m

^ "

i —-~

£ • ^

.n . . „ .

i i - f i li° °i 1"== 1

S ^ 1 "a^ 11 s^. II

1 ^ 1'^ Ol'

• ^VT1

-./ l rs c o t ^ I I rg-ra^ _j 1

M mJ KH y ^ B

-7"

. ' r:)

JSS; 2 9ig To

nope

p

spo

m?

Dow

n

11 1 E > ' Q. . C O i_

ffi-a ri< (D

1 u !t)

.

Stre

ta

lly

then

The

>w

F

J£S i 2 l J£X

fan D D D D

c.. 2

1 f 5 -3

1-i2

D D

^

^

^

I J

f

81 T3

O) a .

o >

s > ^ 5^= S.££„ff l§ 1- * - _ D _

—s ^ *rf "S *^ S

o ' o c X » 3

£•5 illi O 01 • -

£ I , ^ n o ffl •_ Joog-^-go

. C O ^Ê-S,o| i — .10

L. (0 ^ £ = - = : s (i> £os=-K§5-o

E'

m o-"*:. 0-.Q c

„ „ <o tt » OS c c . - *- -

Js: o <a (O o > c

A / ^

stream & Location: j^<A?~^^^

Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index r i u a c and Use Assessment Field Sheet ^ ^ ^ ' ^*^^''^' (p-

RM: D a t e : ^ J g_lf 0 ^ 1

Scorers Full Name & Affjllatlon-Jf^^ ^.-w/T^*^ C / ^ j * ^/Ver Cod^* STORET »: . \r^: i ôpg-

WAD 83 - declmil °1 /8 Office veri^Bd f-. location LJ

|M

1] S U B S T R A T E Check O/VL/Two substrate TYPE BOXES; estimate % or note every type present

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE D D BLDR/SLABS [10] D D BOULDER [9] _ I O M a ^ O B B L E [8] 3 0 ; 5 2 L a&;0fiAVEL[7i , 5 5 1 2 k n

" 0 0 SAND[6]. >' 5 '^ \V n n BEDROCK[5] *

OTHER TYPES D n HARDPAN [4] D D DETRITUS [3] nnM.ucK[2] Pn*?ltir[2i n n ARTIFICIAL

POOL RIFFLE

IZE

Comments

(Score natural substrates; ignons O

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) ORIGIN QUALITY

D LIMESTONE [1] Q HEAVY [-2] D TILLS [11 D M O D E R A T E I - I ] Substrate nWETLA|iDS[03 ^ " - ' \ g * IORMAL[01 njVVRDp^.K] ^?-^-^J 'J

^ » " N U M B E R OF B E S T T Y P E S ^ f e i t t * e m ^'"^^^ '"*"* point-sources) g # C l & T I % l N § | p i w

nC9^LflNESHI

^ % niiioDFrArr[ • 'î5BôRinAL[03

nN0NE[1J

Maximum 20

2] I N S T R E A M C O V E R Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal quality; 2-Moderate anwunts. but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep well-defined, functional pools

ÛfclDpRCUT BANKS [1] F00LS^>7pcmT23 t OVERHANGirÔ VEGETATI0N.[1] ROOTWADS [1]

1 SHALLOWS (Ifcfc^LOW WATfeR) [1] 2 - BOULDERS [1] I ROOTMATS [11

Comments

CpCBOKiKS, BAOKWATERSil] AQUA11G,$ACKQBHYT^ [d] LOGS OR WO'C^DYDEBRIS 11]

AMOUNT Check ONE {Or 2 & average)

• rXTFNSIVE '75 M l ^ p "^WODERAIE 2^ ""» I » | 'QbPARSE' - *? ' - [" ^ '^" Q NCARLV ADSCST ••

Cover Mata'mum

20

3] CHANNEL M O R P H O L O G Y Check ONE in each category {Or 2 & average) SINUOSITY D E V E L O P M E N T CHANNELIZAT ION STABIL ITY

® f c D E R A T & [ 3 ] ^ $ Q % W K ^0>ECO\?EBE0.MI ^ t ^ l ^ ^ J B ^

D m^^ [1] n POOR [1] n SBceNT bR NO RECOVERY [i] Comments

Channel Maximum

20

4] B A N K E R O S I O N A N D R I P A R I A N Z O N E Check O N E in each category for EACH BANK (Or 2 per bank & average) RlvrrishtlooWna downstream R IPARIAN W I D T H FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY

EROSION n fi|i|DjE>î^|;« L lSjOREST;SWAMBra;^.^^^ ' : D n M p f e R V A T I O N TILLAGE [1] J M p l ^ t l ^ ; -^D S ^ & R / C f l E j f g ^ | 3 ] nmHBOpOROCEfeF lE fegh l ^ i ' D D ^ ^ O R INDUSTRIAL[0]

:/5EVf]g^«nnpfY^ÂBI«&* ' indicate predominant land use(s} U npJNE ' I ra " D noP£N'PASTpRE,ROWeR0P[6]- past 100mriparian. Wparianm,^

C o m m e n t s Maximum l [ \

um

5] POOL / GLIDE AND RIFFLE/RUN QUALITY MAXIMUM DEPTH Check ONE {ONLYf) a > i t t i [ 6 ]

^0$,4xo.7m[23 n 02-<0,i*m [1] n < 0 . 2 m [ 0 ]

Comments

CURRENT VELOCITY Check ALltJha^pply

CHANNEL WIDTH Check ONE {Or 2 & average)

_ | S R ! i w i ! | » | j p ^ ._.._ . _^ niE^BWWMWiiWi^^Q ^ niNTiR&nrT f2t

'^ÔDERATEEir DEDtyteEfr Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

nn;0RRElSJTjAL[:,13 Q ^ L O W [ t l DVERYFASTtlJ' Dl^r^STlTriCtlf^fj

Recreation Potential Primary Contact

Secondary Contact (circfe one and comment on bach)

Pool/ Cunent

Maximum 12

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population _ o f r i f f le -ob l iga te s p e c i e s : Check ONE {Or 2 & average). L I N O RIFFLE [metric=0]

RIFFLE DEPTH RUN DEPTH RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS nÊSTAREAS > 10cm [2] QMAXIMUW > 50cm [21 ^ T A B L E (e.g., Cobble,.Boii!.der) [2] n MON^^pj]

^ ^ B E S T AREAS 5-10crn[1] "jgjWAXIMUM < SO'em [ir^j&MOD. STABLE (e.g., Laê Grdv^l) [1] S l O W [1 ] ' DBEST AREAS < Scm U UNSTABLE<e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand)[0] Q M Q D E R A T E [0] ^ ^ ^ i , „ ^

comments " " " " " ^ D B X T E N 3 . V E H J , _ « - | | ^ 5

G] GRADIENT ^ DRAINAGE AREA

( OM)

ftfmi) n VERY LOW - LOW [2-4] n MODERATE [6-10] v

mJZ) 'P^y^jGH-VERY HIGH [10-6] i /

%POOL:( ) %GLIDE:( )

%RUN: ( )%RIFFLE:( )

Gradient Maximum

EPA 4520 06/16/06

12

I uj ^ a - c s

Ul

o ^ <

S I

.^ m

•a "3

— 3 " o Z • ^ " ^ T l Jtf ^ - ^

ra ^,

o

tx JM E IX .Q ? A C

•gfc i I ^ I.

nnnnDnnnnn

SDDDDn tt .J

aDDDD X

I E 5g

o Y h- p o « o o * UJ V C4 ^ A «

annnn

"ssed?

I

l i j •"" ^ i j i ls z UJ Z OS i t ^

CO

UlTM Z U» CJ ^ ^ H o o o o O

lU

Y Y ^

z Ul

O tf>

s? Y A i n n ^ j r y V

DDDJEP

APPENDIX D

SELECTED PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo 1. Wetland Alt-004 Typical PEM

Photo 2. Wetland Alt-w002 Typical PEM/PFO

Photo 3. Wetland Alt-w022 Typical PEM/PSS

Photo 4. Wetland Alt-023 Typical PFO

Photo 5. Wetland Alt-wOI 1 Typical PFO/PSS

Photo 6. Wetland Alt-w013 Typical PSS

Photo 7. Wetland Alt-w006 Typical PSS/PEM

Photo 8. Wetland Alt-w020 Typical PSS/PEM/PFO

Photo 9. Wetland Alt-wOlO Typical PSS/PFO

Photo 10. Wetland Alt-w013 Typical PSS/PFO/PEM

Photo 1. Stream Alt-s017 Typical Poor Warmvi'ater Habitat

Photo 2. Stream Alt-s015 Typical Good Warmwater Habitat

Photo 3. Stream Alt-s022 Typical Excellent Warmwater Habitat

Photo 4. Stream Alt-s021



Documents

Large Filing Separator Sheet...Deoth to Saturated Soil: 5(* r'WcC^ (in.) Remarks; ftlh j4/«^ Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Inundated Z^aturated in Upper 12" X Water