Upload
sanchay-saxena
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
1/15
"#$%&'()*'(+#& +# ,*'%-(*.-%,+$*. ,%/0*#(&,& (# .*&%-
*1.*'(+# +2 ,%'*.&3+4-&% 5-+6%/'7 89 ::;
?*,%&0 @> A(#)0
B%C*-',%#' +2 8%/0*#(/*. 9#)(#%%-(#)
""D EF8EGH
DG I A0*#'*#4 5*4.?('%&0 @0(/0*=(* J KKLKLLLLK
M(&0*= A0*0 J KKLKLLLLN
A*#/0*O A*P%#* J KKLKLLLL:
?*6 B+&0( J KKLKLLLLQ
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
2/15
!"#$%
1) Abstract2) Introduction of the problem undertaken3) Machine and workpiece specifications4) Literature review5) Experimental Analysis6) Conclusions7) Future scope8) References
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
3/15
&'()*&+)
The present study is an effort to understand material removal mechanism in laser
ablation of metals by focusing on laser drilling. The change in material removal
mechanism with variation in power density of laser was studied.
Experiments were conducted to study the effect of input power on MRR and the
sample was then analyzed under a 5X microscope to find entry hole diameter, exit
hole diameter and taper angle in continuous and pulsed laser drilling of titanium.
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
4/15
!")*-#.+)!-" -/ )0$ 1*-'2$3 ."#$*)&4$"
The basic concept of laser involves providing the lasing material (in our case glass
fibre) with energy so as to excite electrons to higher energy states and when these
electrons come back to their ground state they emit photons. These photons arereflected back and forth by the mirrors at the two ends of glass fibre thus exciting
more electrons. Finally, photons with sufficient energy escape through the end
producing a narrow laser beam.
Laser ablation is the process of removing material from a solid surface by
irradiating it with a laser beam. Usually, laser ablation refers to removing material
with a pulsed laser, but it is possible to ablate material with a continuous wave
laser beam if the laser intensity is high enough.
In this paper we have tried to investigate laser ablation by focusing on laser drilling
in continuous-wave and pulsed forms of the laser. The approach was as follows:
Understanding basic material removal mechanism in laser drilling and variousfactors affecting it by performing a literature review for the same.
Further studies were conducted by referring to published papers to know theaffect of machine parameters such power, frequency and duty cycle on process
parameters such as MRR, taper of drilled holes etc.
Experiments were conducted to verify the results of the referred journals.
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
5/15
3&+0!"$ &"# 5-*41!$+$ (1$+!/!+&)!-"(
MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS:Glass fibre laser
Max power: 100 WMax frequency: 100 kHz
Pulse width: of the order of s
Intensity type: Gaussian
WORKPIECE SPECIFICATIONS:Workpiece material: TitaniumWorkpiece thickness: 500 m
Specific heat (C) : 560 J/kg.K
Latent heat of melting : 360 kJ/kg
Melting temperature: 1950 K
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
6/15
2!)$*&).*$ *$6!$5
MATERIAL REMOVAL MECHANISM
Laser drilling is based on the absorption of the laser energy by the workpiecematerial and the conversion of the photon energy into thermal energy. When the
temperature exceeds that of the melting and/or vaporization, the workpiece
material changes phase and the hole geometry is formed. If the laser irradiance is
kept below a certain threshold (typically 106 W/cm2 for steels) the workpiece
material is melted and not vaporized. In that case, the hole is formed due to
ejection of the melted material with the use of an assisting gas jet. For laser
irradiance values beyond the threshold value, the material is removed mainly due
to vaporization.
MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE IN CW LASER DRILLING
In continuous-wave laser drilling, as power increases more energy is provided to
the surface and melting temperature is attained faster. Thus, it is obvious that with
increase in input power, material removal rate (MRR) in CW laser drilling
increase.
NO. OF PULSES REQUIRED TO DRILL IN PULSED LASER DRILLING
In case of pulsed laser, rather than MRR, number of pulses for melting the sampleis a better measure. A fixed amount of energy needs to be supplied for drilling to
occur .If we assume that cooling can be neglected then, at a fixed duty cycle and
frequency, as power increases the number of pulses required for drilling will
decrease.
HOLE ENTRANCE DIAMETER
We are using a Gaussian beam in this experiment, which has an intensity equation:
! ! !!!!
!!"#!!
!!!!!
!!
!
where P=power and r2=x
2+y
2
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
7/15
The rise in temperature at point (x,y,z) using such a beam in drilling if laser is
located at (0,0,0) is given by:
! ! !! ! !!!"# !!"
!"!!! ! !!!!!!!
!! ! !!
!! ! !!
!
!"#!! !!!!! ! !!
!! ! !!
!
!
!!
!!!! ! !!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!
Hence, when power is increased a larger area attains sufficient temperature above
melting temperature and therefore as power increases hole entry diameter
increases.
HOLE TAPER
Holes drilled using lasers are not perfect and have taper present in them. This is
due to the fact that as laser beam penetrates the material the energy is conducted tosurrounding metal and a smaller area attains a temperature greater than that of
melting. Therefore, laser drilled holes are tapered.
dent=entry diameter, dexit=exit diameter
!= Taper angle, t=thickness of material
At high input power, time required for laser to go through and through the
workpiece decreases and hence very less amount of heat spreads to the surroundingmaterial. Thus, the taper angle decreases with increase in input power.
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
8/15
$%1$*!3$")&2 *$(.2)(
The machine and workpiece specifications have been already mentioned. The
following experiments were carried out to verify the literature review given in the
previous section:
! CONTINUOUS WAVE LASER DRILLING Material Removal Rate VS Power
Laser drilling was carried out on the workpiece (titanium) and time for
drilling was measured. After each drilling operation workpiece weight was
taken. Using difference of weight after respective drills, density of titanium
and time measured, MRR was calculated.
Frequency => 10 kHz
SR. NO. POWER (W) MRR (mm3/min)
1. 40 3.25
2. 60 3.35
3. 80 4.00
4. 100 4.24
N
N>R
:
:>R
Q
Q>R
R
L NL QL SL ;L KLL KNL
3**7889:8;?@A 75=
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
9/15
Hole entry diameter VS PowerThe drilled hole was observed under 5X microscope and hole entry
diameter was measured.
Frequency = 10 kHz
SR. NO. POWER (W) ENTRY DIA. (m)
1. 40 29.55
2. 60 32.01
3. 80 38.49
4. 100 43.22
Taper VS PowerHole entry and exit diameters were measured by observing the drilled hole
under 5X microscope and following formula was used to find taper angle:
!"#$%!!"#! ! !"#!! !!"#$%!!!"#$!!!!!"#$%&&
!
!"#
!
Frequency = 10 kHz
SR. NO. POWER (W) Entry dia. (m) Exit dia. (m) Taper (deg.)
1. 40 29.55 15.22 0.82
2. 60 32.01 20.63 0.65
3. 80 38.49 29.77 0.5
4. 100 43.22 36.60 0.38
L
R
KL
KR
NL
NR
:L
:R
QLQR
RL
L NL QL SL ;L KLL KNL
0>B@@?@A 75=
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
10/15
!PULSED LASER DRILLING No. of pulses to melt VS Power
Holes are drilled using pulsed laser and time is measured. Then, using the
frequency of machine number of pulses are calculated.
Frequency = 100 Hz , Duty cycle = 50%
SR. NO. POWER (W) TIME (s) No. of Pulses
1. 10 145.22 14522
2. 20 42.9 4290
3. 40 10.68 10684. 60 3.85 385
5. 100 0.94 94
L
L>K
L>N
L>:
L>QL>R
L>S
L>T
L>;
L>U
L NL QL SL ;L KLL KNL
)FI@A&?@A 75=
L
NLLL
QLLL
SLLL
;LLL
KLLLL
KNLLL
KQLLL
KSLLL
L NL QL SL ;L KLL KNL
">G>KILBM@M
1>?@A 75=
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
11/15
Hole entry diameter VS PowerIt is performed in the same way as described in the CW laser drilling
section.
SR. NO. POWER (W) ENTRY DIA. (m)1. 20 58.21
2. 40 61.91
3. 60 64.02
4. 80 65.33
Taper VS PowerUsing the same formula as in the CW case;
SR. NO. POWER (W) Entry dia. (m) Exit dia. (m) Taper (deg.)
1. 20 58.21 27.00 1.79
2. 40 61.91 34.18 1.59
3. 60 64.02 40.07 1.37
4. 80 65.33 46.29 1.09
RT
R;
RU
SL
SK
SN
S:
SQ
SR
SS
L KL NL :L QL RL SL TL ;L UL
0>B@@?@A 75=
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
12/15
L>LL
L>NL
L>QL
L>SL
L>;L
K>LL
K>NL
K>QL
K>SL
K>;L
N>LL
L KL NL :L QL RL SL TL ;L UL
)FI@A7E@JG=
1>?@A 75=
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
13/15
+-"+2.(!-"( &"# 1-)$")!&2 -.)+-3$( -/ )0$ 1*-N$+)
As predicted from theory, with increase in input power, MRR increases since more
amount of material gets the minimum threshold energy required for laser drilling.
At constant duty cycle, with increase in input power, the number of pulses required
to melt the material for laser drilling decreases which is obvious since more
amount of energy is contained in each pulse at high input power. Ideally, the graph
of number of pulses vs. input power should be hyperbolic but some energy is lost
because of cooling of material between the pulses. Hence, the number of pulses
required at low input power is quite high.
As the laser beam strikes the surface, the material on surface absorbs the energy
and melts and provides a way for laser to go further deep, thus creating a hole onthe surface. With increase in input power, more material gets melted and thus the
entry-hole diameter increases.
As the laser goes further deep in the workpiece, its energy spreads into the
surrounding material and hence, less amount of material gets the minimum
threshold energy required for melting and so, the hole diameter decreases resulting
in slightly tapered hole (1 ~ 2 degrees).
The trend of taper angle is also in agreement with literature read.
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
14/15
/.).*$ (+-1$
More insight into laser ablation can be obtained by:
1) Study of heat affected zones.
2) Using uniform circular/rectangular laser beam instead of Gaussian circular beam
3) Study of the effect of duty cycle on MRR.
4) Performing laser cutting instead of laser drilling.
5) Study of machined surface using interferometer.
6) Performing experiment with varying laser beam diameter.
7) Study of the impact of melting and boiling temperature of workpiece on MRR.
8/13/2019 Laser Machine Project
15/15
*$/$*$"+$(
1.A theoretical and experimental investigation on limitations of pulsed laserdrilling-
Konstantinos Salonitis, Aristidis Stournaras, George Tsoukantas, Panagiotis
Stavropoulos, George Chryssolouris
2. Comparative statistical analysis of hole taper and circularity in laserpercussion drilling
M. Ghoreish, D.K.Y. Low, L. Li
3.Laser drilling of high aspect ratio holes in femtosecond, picosecond andnanosecond pulses
A. Weck, T.H.R. Crawford, D.S. Wilkinson, H.K.Haugen, J.S. Preston
4.A study of thermal and mechanical effects on materials induced by pulsedlaser drilling A. Luft, U. Franz, A. Emsermann, J. Kaspar
5.Parametric study to improve laser hole drilling process-B.S. Yilbas
6.Notes on laser micromachiningProf. Ramesh Singh