Upload
kelley-beasley
View
220
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Laura Porter, DSHS ACE PartnershipsMarch 6, 2013
Adverse Childhood Experiencein Washington
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
Brains to Fit the Life We’ll LiveWHY IT WORKSUnder the worst conditions, such as war & famine, both the individual & the species survive.
INDIVIDUALcharacteristics & traits
• Competitive• Impulsive• Hyper vigilant• Hyper reactive• Focused – hard to
shift gearsOR
• Withdrawn• Emotionally Detached• Numb
Toxic Context
INDIVIDUALcharacteristics & traits
• Laid back• Relationship-oriented• Reflective• Shift focus - seize
opportunity• “Process over power”
WHY IT WORKSBy striving for cooperative relationships, individual & species live peacefully & survive.
Protective Context
Predictable Patterns: Electrical & Chemical
Functioning; Brain Mass &
Gene Expression
Neutral Start then…
brains adapt to experience
Dissonance between biological expectations
& social reality fuels psychiatric disorders
The Neurobiology of Toxic Experience
See for example: “Neurobiological and Behavioral Consequences of Exposure to Childhood Traumatic Stress” Stress in Health and Disease; Arnetz & Ekman (eds); Teicher et. al.; 2006“Scars that Won’t Heal: The Neurobiology of Child Abuse” Scientific American; Teicher; March, 2002, pp. 68-75.“Childhood Experience and the expression of Genetic Potential: What Childhood Neglect Tells Us About Nature and Nurture”; Brain and Mind 3:79-100; Perry; 2002
Type of Experience
Gender
Age – Sensitive Periods
Premature BirthFetal Death
Post-partum DepressionAttachment Challenges
Reduced Brain MassDifficult to Sooth
Stress/Hormone Dis-regulationRelationship Challenges
Pre-Natal
Toxic Stress is Hard-Wired Into Biology
Early ChildhoodEmotional Reaction
Verbal MemorySpatial Memory
Judgment Self MonitoringSelf Awareness
Motivation
Right-Left Brain Communication
Social CuesInsight
Movement Language & Math
Visual Memory/Meaning
Middle Childhood
Pre-puberty - Adolescence
AttentionLong Term Memory
Mental Health Goal-oriented ActionRegulating movement through environment
COGNITIVE
SOCIAL
MENTAL HEALTH
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
PHYSICAL AGILITY
SAFETY
CHRONIC DISEASE
PRODUCTIVITY
STATUS
Enduring Effects
Adverse Childhood Experience Study
Largest Study of its Kind
Over 17,000 participants
Both Retrospective and Prospective
Over 100 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
Shifting the Paradigm
Helps Us Understand Drivers of Population Health and Wellbeing
Adverse Childhood Experiences are Interrelated
Abuse1. Child physical abuse 2. Child sexual abuse3. Child emotional abuse
Neglect4. Physical Neglect5. Emotional Neglect
Indicators of Family Dysfunction6. Mentally ill, depressed or suicidal person in the home7. Drug addicted or alcoholic family member8. Parental discord – indicated by divorce, separation, abandonment9. Witnessing domestic violence against the mother10. Incarceration of any family member
87%
with 1 ACE have
another
ACEs Have Cumulative Effect: ACE Score = Number of Categories of ACEs (1-10)
ACEs are Common Among Washington Adults
62% have at least one ACE category
26% have ≥ three
5% have ≥ six
Dose-Response RelationshipHigher ACE Score Reliably Predicts Prevalence of Health Problems
Higher ACE Score
Resp
onse
get
s bi
gger
The size of the “dose”— the number of ACE categories
Drives the “response”— the occurrence of health, social, workforce problems & early death
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
A Significant Portion Of Risk for Disease Is Attributable to ACEs…
Smoking
Heavy Drinking
Binge Drinking
Drinking and Driving
Had a Drug Problem
Addicted to Drugs
Ever Injected Drugs
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 80
5
10
15
20
25
30
10.413.2
11.1
16.3
20.8
28.5
Current Smoking- Wash-ington
Number of ACE CategoriesPerc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on C
urre
ntly
Sm
okin
g
0 1 2 3 4 ≥50
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1.33
3.95
7.5
12
Ever Had a Drug Problem
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on w
ith P
robl
emOriginal ACE Study
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
A Significant Portion of Chronic Disease is Attributable to ACEs
Cardio Vascular Disease
Cancer
Diabetes
Asthma
Auto Immune Disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Ischemic heart disease
Liver Disease
4.95.6
6.75.6
9.4
8.1
0123456789
10
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 8
% o
f Pop
ulati
on w
ith C
-V D
isea
se
Number of ACE Categories
Cardio Vascular Disease
1.3
33.9
5
7.5
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 ≥5
% o
f Pop
ulati
on w
ith A
sthm
a
ACE Score
Asthma
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
A Large Portion of Mental Illness Is Attributable to ACEs…
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 80
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1.92.8
5
7
8.8
15
Anxiety
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on
Depression
Serious and persistent mental illness
Frequent mental distress
Nervousness
Suicide attempts
Emotional problems that restrict activities
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 80
5
10
15
20
25
30
7.311
14 15.519.3
24.5
Treatment for Mental Health Condition
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on
A Large Portion of Mental Illness Is Attributable to ACEs…
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 80
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1.92.8
5
7
8.8
15
Anxiety
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on
Depression
Serious and persistent mental illness
Frequent mental distress
Nervousness
Suicide attempts
Emotional problems that restrict activities
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 80
5
10
15
20
25
30
7.311
14 15.519.3
24.5
Treatment for Mental Health Condition
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on
A Significant Portion of Disability & Disability-Related Barriers to EmploymentIs Attributable to ACEs…
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
0 ≥ 3 ≥ 60
5
10
15
20
25
4
9
20
Number of ACE Categories
% o
f Peo
ple
Mis
sing
≥ 1
0 W
ork
Day
s in
Pas
t Mon
th
Missing Work Due to Disability
0 1 2 3 4 or 5 6,7, or 8
0
4
8
12
16
5.2 5.2 6.48.6
11.3
14.8
Health Problems Requiring Special Equipment
Number of ACE Categories
Perc
ent o
f Pop
ulati
on
Some ACE-Attributable Disabilities are Invisible
ADHDAnxiety Disorders
AsthmaBipolar Disorder
Chronic PainSleep disorders
DepressionDiabetes
HypoglycemiaMajor Depression
Metabolic SyndromePersonality Disorders
Primary ImmunodeficiencyPsychiatric disabilities
ArthritisSchizophrenia
ACEs and Ability to Engage in Work/Life Activities
Attributable to ACEs:
Disability-Related Days when Can’t Do Usual Activities
Worker Injury
Work-related Illness
Drugs/Alcohol
Hopelessness
Health Limits Activity
Serious Job Problems
Serious Financial Problems
0 ≥ 3 ≥ 60
5
10
15
20
25
4
9
20
Missed Work
Number of ACE Categories
% M
issi
ng ≥
10
Wor
k D
ays/
Mon
th
0 1 2 3 4, 5 6,7, 80
2
4
6
8
10
12
3.65
76.1
8.910.1
Work-Related Injury or Illness in Past Year
Perc
ent w
ith In
jury
/Ill
ness
29.7% of the Working Age Population (Age 18-64) has 3 or more ACEs
ACEs in WA High Schools
Graphic by Northwest Children’s Fund, 2012
In the average Washington classroom:
·6 students have no ACE
·5 students have 1 ACEs
·6 students have 2 ACEs
·3 students have 3 ACEs
·7 students have 4-5 ACEs
·3 students have 6+ ACEs
Knowing the prevalence of ACEs and how they affect brain development, it’s clear to see why so many students struggle to focus in an academic environment.
Multiple Mental, Physical,
Relational, &/or Productivity
Problems
Adverse Childhood Experience
Adverse Peer &/or School Experience
Adverse Adult Experience
WA Data Shows Cascade of Experiences …Societal Response Matters
ACETransmission
Risk
Elementary Children12% ≥ 3
ACEs1. Health,
attendance, behavior
2. Academic failure
Court-Involved Youth
Higher ACE ScoresAmong those with ≥4:
51% special ed. (vs. 33% 0-1)
74% below 2.0 GPA (58%)
85% suspended by 2nd (71%)
33% re-offend in 2 years (13%)
Adult AdversityIncarceration
Victim of Intimate Partner Violence
Drug/Alcohol Mental Illness
Divorce
Parenting Adultswith ≥5 ACE14 TIMES
more likely to have two or more conditions that make
ACEs for kids
Work injury- illnessHomelessness
DisabilityPoverty
Health limits activity
Unemployment
In Washington….
High School Youth
42% ≥ 3 ACEs
“Understanding Adverse Childhood Experiences can open doors for the future you would like for yourself and for future generations.”
Dr. Ronald Voorhees, MD, PhDChief Office of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Allegheny County Health Department
(c) DSHS PPA ACE Partnerships, 2013
CAPABILITY ATTACHMENT & BELONGING
COMMUNITY, CULTURE,
SPIRITUALITY
• Bonds with parents and/or caregivers
• Positive relationships with competent and nurturing adults
• Friends or romantic partners who provide a sense of security & belonging, help with emotion coaching
• Intellectual & employable skills
• Self regulation – self control, executive function, flexible thinking
• Ability to direct & control attention, emotion, behavior
• Positive self view, efficacy
• Faith, hope, sense of meaning
• Engagement with effective orgs – schools, work, pro-social groups
• Network of supports/services & opportunity to help others
• Cultures providing positive standards, expectations, rituals, relationships & supports
Resilience definition: Iris HeavyRunner
Three Systems For Promoting Resilience
KEY COMPONENTS OF RESILIENCE AS A DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESS
CAPABILITY
ATTACHMENT & BELONGING
COMMUNITY, CULTURE,
SPIRITUALITY
Resilience Index:Hope, Positive View, Social/Emotional Support
Capacity Building Process:Opportunities for Everyone to HelpComing Together – See the Truth ClearlyLearning Together – ReciprocityResults-Based Decisions – Desired Future
Washington Measures
High-Leverage Solutions
Moderate ACE Effects Among Parenting Adults:
Build on Strengths; Improve Functioning &
Coping
81
Prevent ACE accumulation
in next generation
Virtuous CycleFewer ACE
effects
Mercer Isle/Point CitiesIssaquah/Sammamish
Capitol Hill/EastlakeSoutheast King County
NE SeattleBallard-Fremont-Greenlake
RentonN. Seattle/Shoreline
Tukwila/SeaTacRedmond/Union Hill
BellevueBeacon & SE Seattle
KirklandBurien/Des Moines
AuburnQueen Anne/Magnolia
Bothell/WoodinvilleWhite Center/Boulevard Pk
Downtown & CentralCascade & Covington
Lower Valley & Upper SnoqualmieVashon IslandFederal Way
W. Seattle/DelridgeKent
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
Geographical Differences In Prevalence of 3 or more ACEs Among Health Planning Areas In King County
For Adults In Households With Children
Community Variation
In Some King County Communities…41% of Parenting Adults have an ACE Score of ≥ 3
In Other Communities…6% of Parenting Adults have an ACE Score of ≥ 3
(Washington State Prevalence among all adults is just over 26%)
Preliminary Analysis, BRFSS Data 2009-2011
W. Seattle/DelridgeTukwila/SeaTac
Mercer Isle/Point CitiesBeacon & SE SeattleBurien/Des Moines
Federal WayQueen Anne/Magnolia
BellevueCapitol Hill/Eastlake
Downtown & CentralCascade & Covington
KirklandRedmond/Union Hill
Southeast King CountyBothell/Woodinville
Issaquah/SammamishKent
NE SeattleN. Seattle/Shoreline
Lower Valley & Upper SnoqualmieWhite Center/Boulevard Pk
RentonAuburn
Ballard-Fremont-GreenlakeVashon Island
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Always or usually receive needed emo-tional support
Percent of adults in households with children
Heal
th P
lann
ing
Area
s
ACEs Are… Not The Whole Story
Some Communities with High ACE
Prevalence Also Have High Levels of
Social/Emotional Support
SOCIAL/EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AS A RESILIENCE FACTOR
Cardiovascular Diabetes Receive Treatment for Mental Illness0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
7.50%
10.40%
15.70%
7.00%
9.10%
8.20%
5.70%
7.20%
1.40%
Rarely/Never Sometimes Always/Usually Have SupportRarely/Never Receive Support Sometimes Receive Support Always/Usually Have Support
Support, Positive View & Hope Improve Housing Stability
Low Resiliency High Resiliency0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
19
2.6
Resiliency Score: Social-Emotional Support, Positive View/Narrative, Hope
Perc
ent W
ho M
oved
≥4
Tim
es in
Pas
t Yea
r
Moved ≥ 4 Times in Past Year
Unemployment: ACEs by Resilience
0 ACEs 1 ACE 2 ACES 3 ACEs 4-5 ACEs 6-8 ACEs0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
High Resilience Low Resilience
% U
nem
ploy
ed
Resilience Measures: Social/Emotional Support, Positive View, Hope
Individual
Family
National, Global, Ecosystem
RESILIENCE OCCURS AT ALL LEVELS
The natural human capacity
to navigate life well.
(HeavyRunner & Marshall, 2003)
Community
Efficacious Community
What Helps?1. Opportunities for Everyone to Help – to Co-Lead
2. Coming Together – Focus on Matters of Importance
3. Learning Together – Reciprocity
4. Results-Based Decisions – Acting from Desired Future
THE POWER OF COMMUNITY CAPACITYLESS DEPRESSION & SERIOUS PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS
Ages 18-34
Serious Mental Illness Mentally Ill Depressed 0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
16.10%
22.70%
43.00%
4.40%
8.20%
28.50%
Ages 18 – 34 with 3-8 ACEs
Significant differences after controlling for age, education, income, race/ethnicity, and ACE score.
High Capacity
High Capacity
Severe Depression
High Capacity
Reduced Prevalence of High ACE Scores Among 18-34 Year Olds
In Communities using Community Capacity Development (CCD) Model
Source: Strength, Stress, Work, Hope; Technical Appendix, in press; Washington Family Policy Council; 2012
Percent with ≥3 ACEs
ACE REDUCTION
Reliably Predicts Improved
HEALTH
WELL-BEING
PRODUCTIVITY
Population Attributable Risk for ACE–related problems ranges from 20% to 70%
“For every ACE that we can prevent or
mitigate…We are improving a child’s chances for a
healthy future.”NW Children’s Fund Annual Report, 2012