41
Law & Economics: This is Water, Too ___ Three? ^ Stephen J. O'Brien, Ph.D. Partner, St. Louis +1 314 259 5904 [email protected]

Law & Economics - Dentons

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Law & Economics - Dentons

Law &

Economics:

This is Water, Too___ Three?

^Stephen J. O'Brien, Ph.D.

Partner, St. Louis

+1 314 259 5904

[email protected]

Page 2: Law & Economics - Dentons

Month Day, Year 2

Page 3: Law & Economics - Dentons

"…the most obvious, important realities are often the ones that are

hardest to see and talk about."

3

Page 4: Law & Economics - Dentons

4

Page 5: Law & Economics - Dentons

5

Law & Economics

^

Page 6: Law & Economics - Dentons

6

Page 7: Law & Economics - Dentons

7

Page 8: Law & Economics - Dentons

Ph.D's in top law schools

8

27%

Economic

Ph.D's 7%

Page 9: Law & Economics - Dentons

Ph.D's in private practice

9

2.6%

Economic

Ph.D's 0.026%

Page 10: Law & Economics - Dentons

10

Page 11: Law & Economics - Dentons

11

L&E is

everywhere

Page 12: Law & Economics - Dentons

So let's play!

12

Page 13: Law & Economics - Dentons

13

Page 14: Law & Economics - Dentons

14

Damages Statistics

Supreme Court

Expert Witnesses

Page 15: Law & Economics - Dentons

15

Supreme Court

Page 16: Law & Economics - Dentons

Within the current term through May 30, 2019, the two justices who have voted together the most (majority/concurring, or dissent) are:

A. Thomas and GorsuchB. Ginsberg and SotomayorC. Kavanaugh and GorsuchD. Thomas and Alito

16

Page 17: Law & Economics - Dentons

17

Thomas Ginsberg Breyer Alito Sotomayor Kagan Gorsuch Kavanaugh

Roberts 75.00% 73.33% 74.42% 86.36% 74.42% 79.07% 71.11% 91.43%

Thomas 60.00% 63.64% 88.64% 59.09% 63.64% 84.09% 82.86%

Ginsberg 88.89% 66.67% 97.78% 93.33% 68.89% 74.29%

Breyer 72.09% 90.70% 95.35% 67.44% 80.00%

Alito 65.91% 70.45% 86.36% 82.86%

Sotomayor 95.35% 69.77% 71.43%

Kagan 67.44% 77.14%

Gorsuch 77.14%

Kavanaugh

Kagan 80.22%

Kavanaugh 79.64%

Breyer 79.07%

Roberts 78.14%

Sotomayor 77.78%

Ginsberg 77.62%

Alito 77.42%

Gorsuch 74.03%

Thomas 72.12%

Page 18: Law & Economics - Dentons

18END

Page 19: Law & Economics - Dentons

19

Damages Statistics

Supreme Court

Expert Witnesses

Page 20: Law & Economics - Dentons

Month Day, Year 20

Damages

Page 21: Law & Economics - Dentons

Alex values his Picasso at $2M, but Barry offers him $2.1M and they agree. Before Barry pays and takes possession, Carol offers $2.5M and Alex sells it to her instead. Barry’s expectation damages are:

A. $0B. $400,000C. Barry’s personal value less $2.1MD. $2.5M

21

Page 22: Law & Economics - Dentons

22

P

QQ*

P*

Page 23: Law & Economics - Dentons

23

P

QQ*

P*

D (?)

D’ (?)

Page 24: Law & Economics - Dentons

24

P

Q

D

D’

Q*

Page 25: Law & Economics - Dentons

25

P

QQ1

P*

Q2

END

Page 26: Law & Economics - Dentons

26

Damages Statistics

Supreme Court

Expert Witnesses

Page 27: Law & Economics - Dentons

Month Day, Year 27

Statistics

Page 28: Law & Economics - Dentons

In December 2018, BMJ published the first randomized controlled trial of parachute use and found that death and major trauma after jumping from an aircraft were

A. no different between parachute use and the control B. statistically significant and lower than the control C. higher than the control but not statistically significant

Month Day, Year 28

Page 29: Law & Economics - Dentons

Month Day, Year 29

Page 30: Law & Economics - Dentons

Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, 563 U.S. 27 (2011).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mavis Discount

Tires, Inc., 129 F. Supp. 3d 90 (S.D. N.Y. 2015).

In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Products Liability

Litigation, 26 F. Supp. 3d 449 (E.D. Pa. 2014).

30

Page 31: Law & Economics - Dentons

31END

Page 32: Law & Economics - Dentons

32

Damages Statistics

Supreme Court

Expert Witnesses

Page 33: Law & Economics - Dentons

Month Day, Year 33

Expert Witnesses

Page 34: Law & Economics - Dentons

According to a 2016 George Mason study of 1,017 federal lawsuits, defendants winning a Daubert motion

A. makes settlement more likelyB. makes settlement less likelyC. has no effect on settlement

34

Page 35: Law & Economics - Dentons

Recent study by James Cooper

(George Mason University)

2,127 rulings

from 1,017 cases

in 91 federal districts

from2003-201435

Page 36: Law & Economics - Dentons

36

Page 37: Law & Economics - Dentons

37

Page 38: Law & Economics - Dentons

38

Plaintiff’s Daubert wins affect

Plaintiff’s win rate

Defendant’s win rate not affected by

Daubert results

Page 39: Law & Economics - Dentons

39

Defendants’ Daubert wins

entrench the parties,

discouraging settlement.

Reason: Defendants win on SJ

84% of time (regardless of success on

Daubert motion)

Page 40: Law & Economics - Dentons

40

Damages Statistics

Supreme Court

Expert Witnesses

END

Page 41: Law & Economics - Dentons

Thanks for playing!

41