Lawsuit v. Burton Katz, Miami, FL

5/26/2018 Lawsuit v. Burton Katz, Miami, FL

1/208


2/208


3/208

3

his proprietary information technology platforms, designs, and programming created for IBM,

and effectively claimed them as their own.

Katz and Smyth are now threatening to completely dispossess Santilli of the fruits of his

hard work and investment. Only this Court can protect Santilli from suffering irreparable harm

from the misappropriation and disclosure of Santillis and IBMs trade secrets

misappropriation and disclosure that leaves Santilli with no adequate remedy at law in that, once

a trade secret has been disclosed, it is as good as lost.

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, ANDVENUE

1. Plaintiff Joseph Santilli is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

2. Defendant Burton Katz is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

3. Defendant Jonathan Smyth is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

4. Defendant Charles Ohana is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

5. Defendants John Doe, John Roe, Jane Doe and Mary Roe are, on information and

belief, residents of Miami-Dade County, Florida who, at all times relevant, aided and abetted,

participated in, and/or conspired to effect one or more of the wrongs alleged herein.

6. Defendant Boomerang International, LLC, is a Nevis limited liability company

with its principal place of business in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

7. Defendant Brightstation International, LLC, is a Nevis limited liability company


8. Defendant License America Holdings, LLC is a Nevis limited liability company


9. Defendant License America Management LLC is a Delaware limited liability

company with its principal place of business in Miami-Dade County, Florida.


4/208


5/208


6/208


7/208


8/208


9/208


10/208


11/208


12/208


13/208


14/208


15/208


16/208


17/208


18/208


19/208


20/208


21/208


22/208


23/208


24/208


25/208


26/208


27/208


28/208


29/208


30/208


31/208


32/208


33/208


34/208


35/208


36/208


37/208


38/208


39/208


40/208


41/208


42/208


43/208


44/208


45/208


46/208


47/208


48/208


49/208


50/208


51/208


52/208


53/208


54/208


55/208


56/208


57/208


58/208


59/208


60/208


61/208


62/208


63/208


64/208


65/208


66/208


67/208


68/208


69/208


70/208


71/208


72/208


73/208


74/208


75/208


76/208


77/208


78/208


79/208


80/208


81/208


82/208


83/208


84/208


85/208


86/208


87/208


88/208


89/208


90/208


91/208


92/208


93/208


94/208


95/208


96/208


97/208


98/208


99/208


100/208


101/208


102/208


103/208


104/208


105/208


106/208


107/208


108/208


109/208


110/208


111/208


112/208


113/208


114/208


115/208


116/208


117/208


118/208


119/208


120/208


121/208


122/208


123/208


124/208


125/208


126/208


127/208


128/208


129/208


130/208


131/208


132/208


133/208


134/208


135/208


136/208


137/208


138/208


139/208


140/208


141/208


142/208


143/208


144/208


145/208


146/208


147/208


148/208


149/208


150/208


151/208


152/208


153/208


154/208


155/208


156/208


157/208


158/208


159/208


160/208


161/208


162/208


163/208


164/208


165/208


166/208


167/208


168/208


169/208


170/208


171/208


172/208


173/208


174/208


175/208


176/208


177/208


178/208


179/208


180/208


181/208


182/208


183/208


184/208


185/208


186/208


187/208


188/208


189/208


190/208


191/208


192/208


193/208


194/208


195/208


196/208


197/208


198/208


199/208


200/208


201/208


202/208


203/208


204/208


205/208


206/208


207/208


208/208

Documents

Lawsuit v. Burton Katz, Miami, FL