Learning Outcomes – from Theory to Practice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    1/44

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    2/44

    Learning Outcomes fromtheory to practice

    Workshop within the frame of the projectINARM

    Veronika Nitsche (WUS Austria)

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]://www.wus-austria.org/mailto:[email protected]://www.wus-austria.org/http://www.wus-austria.org/http://www.wus-austria.org/http://www.wus-austria.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    3/44

    WP 4Learning outcomes for MA and BA

    Duration: 9 months (month 14-22)

    Lead partner: KNU

    Role of EU partners:(according to the proposal)

    The EU partners will participate in the development of

    the learning outcomes for BA and MA, organizepeer-review of the learning outcomes, feedback onthe methodology for LO development and feedbackon the national versions of the LOs. The EU partnerswill travel to the PCU to jointly develop the LOs.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    4/44

    Description of WP 4 (I)

    4.1 Intended learning outcomes for MA and BA: Thenext step of the project would be to design and developintended LOs drawing on the SQFs for informatics and

    management. The academic staff involved in the SQFDevelopment Committee will embark on the developmentof LOs drawing on the Tuning methodology. []

    4.2 Peer-review by EU partners: To ensure the LOs are

    comparable with the European ones peer-review by EUpartners and external experts will be undertaken. Drawingon the peer-review results, the learning outcomes for BAand MA in informatics and management will berevisedand refined. []

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    5/44

    Description of WP 4 (II)

    4.3 Methodology of developing LOs: To ensure widerapplication of the methodology, guidelines on the LOdevelopmentwill be developed. The guidelines will be

    translated into native languages and will be produced inArmenian, Russian, Ukrainian and English.

    4.4 Adapted versions of the LOs for MA and BA:Drawing on the general versions of the learning outcomes

    for BA and MA in informatics and management the PCuniversities will embark on the adaptation to the localneeds. The adapted versions will be circulated among thestakeholders for feedback, the LOs will be refinedandprepared for publications.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    6/44

    Objectives for this Workshop

    It is the overall objective for this session to

    - generate a common understanding on how touse LO,

    - share experiences, and

    - (if applicable) to decide on how to proceed inWP 4.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    7/44

    Session Outline

    The bigger picture theBologna ProcessRecalling the key

    features of learningoutcomesWhere and how to uselearning outcomes

    Learning outcomes andassessmentHow to proceed in WP 4

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    8/44

    Bologna process - shift in

    paradigm:

    from input-oriented to output-oriented

    What do you associate with the Bologna Process?

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    9/44

    The bigger picture (I)

    The Bologna Process, launched with theBologna Declaration of 1999, is one of themain voluntary processes at Europeanlevel; it is today implemented in 47 states,which define theEuropean Higher

    Education Area (EHEA).

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    10/44

    The bigger picture (II)

    The three overarching objectives of the

    Bologna process : introduction of thethree cycle system(bachelor/master/doctorate), qualityassurance and recognitionof

    qualifications and periods of study.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    11/44

    The bigger picture (III)

    Detailed priorities for 2010-2020:

    1. Ensuring a qualityhigher education system

    2. Adopting a two- or three-cycle system of study (BA, MA, PhD)

    3. Promoting the mobilityof students and academic and administrativestaff

    4. Introducing a credit system(ECTS) for the assessment of studyperformance

    5. The Recognition of levels: adopting a system of easily identifiable andcomparable levels

    6. The Active involvementof higher education institutions, teachers andstudents in the Bologna Process and student participation in themanagement of higher education (> teaching and learning experience)

    7. Promoting a European dimensionin higher education

    8. Promoting the attractiveness of the European higher education area

    9. Lifelong learning

    10. A European higher education area and a European research area twopillars of a society based on knowledge

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    12/44

    The bigger picture (IV)

    Status quo:

    HE across the EHEA countries looks

    substantially different from 10 years ago Large difference in the speed of

    implementation and varying levels ofcommittment

    Lack of resources and expertise to guide thedomestic policy process in some countries

    Short-term credit mobility > degree mobility(east>west)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    13/44

    The bigger picture (V)

    Challenges/outlook:

    LO is a controversial topic

    Linking allocation of credits to studentworkload

    No common understanding ofmodularisation

    Integrating the social dimension

    Recognition of prior learning

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    14/44

    The bigger picture (VI)

    LearningOutcomes/Competences

    Teachingmethods/learning

    experience

    ECTS/curriculumdevelopment

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    15/44

    Shift in paradigm:from input-oriented to output-

    oriented

    The princial question asked of the

    student/graduate will no longer be

    what did you do to obtain the degree?but

    what can you do now that you have obtainedyour degree?

    ( Purser, Council of Europe, 2003)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    16/44

    FROM THEORY

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    17/44

    Learning Outcomes

    ... are a statement of what a learner isexpected to know, understand, or able to doat the end of a learning process.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    18/44

    From the definition of LearningOutcomes we see

    ... an emphasis on the learner and an emphasis onthe learners ability to do something.

    Focus on teaching aims and objectives anduse of terms like know,understand, be familiar

    with.

    Focus learning -outcomes: what wewant the student to beable to do - use of terms

    like define, list, name,recall, analyse,calculate, design, etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    19/44

    How do I write Learning

    Outcomes?

    Writing Learning Outcomes is aProcess not an Event (Bloom)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    20/44

    Benjamin Bloom(1913 1999)

    He looked on learning as a processwe buildupon our former learning to develop more

    complex levels of understanding Carried out research in the development of

    classification of levels of thinking behaviours inthe process of learning;

    Worked on drawing up levels of these thinkingbehaviours from the simple recall of facts at thelowest level up to evaluation at the highest level.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    21/44

    Blooms Taxonomy ofEducational Objectives

    Blooms taxonomy (1956) is a very useful aid towriting learning outcomes.

    The taxonomy consists of a hierarchyof

    increasingly complex processes which we wantstudents to acquire.

    It provides a structurefor writing learningoutcomes

    Blooms Taxonomy is frequently used by teachersin writing learning outcomes as it provides a readymade structure and list of verbs.

    The taxonomy has been edited a few times sinceits establishing.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    22/44

    Bloom (1956) proposed that knowingis composed of six successive levels

    arranged in a hierarchy.

    6.Evaluation

    5. Synthesis

    4. Analysis

    3. Application2. Comprehension

    1. Knowledge

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    23/44

    Blooms Classification ofCognitive Skills

    Category Definition Related Behaviors

    Knowledge recalling or remembering something withoutnecessarily understanding, using, or changing it

    define, describe, identify, label, list, match, memorize,

    point to, recall, select, state

    Comprehension understanding something that has been

    communicated without necessarily

    alter, account for, annotate, calculate, change, convert,

    group, explain, generalize, give examples, infer, interpret,

    paraphrase, predict, review, summarize,

    Application using a general concept to solve problems in a

    particular situation; using learned material in new

    and concrete situations

    apply, adopt, collect, construct, demonstrate, discover,

    illustrate, interview, make use of, manipulate, relate,

    show, solve, use

    Analysis breaking something down into its parts; may focus

    on identification of parts or analysis of relationships

    between parts, or recognition of organizational

    principles

    analyze, compare, contrast, diagram, differentiate, dissect,

    distinguish, identify, illustrate, infer, outline, point out,

    select, separate, sort, subdivide

    Synthesis creating something new by putting parts of different

    ideas together to make a whole.

    blend, build, change, combine, compile, compose,

    conceive, create, design, formulate, generate,

    hypothesize, plan, predict, produce, reorder, revise, tell,

    write

    Evaluation

    judging the value of material or methods as they

    might be applied in a particular situation; judging

    with the use of definite criteria

    accept, appraise, assess, arbitrate, award, choose,

    conclude, criticize, defend, evaluate, grade, judge,

    prioritize, recommend, referee, reject, select, support

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    24/44

    Some examples ...

    At the end of the course students will be able to:- Identifyand consider ethical implications of scientific investigations.

    - Differentiatebetween civil and criminal law

    - Selectand employ sophisticated techniques for analysing theefficiencies of energy usage in complex industrial processes.

    - Compareand contrast the different electronic business models- Proposesolutions to complex energy management problems both

    verbally and in writing

    - Predictthe effect of change of temperature on the position ofequilibrium.

    What do you think of this categorisation anddescription by Bloom?

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    25/44

    Benefits and potential problems

    of Learning Outcomes?

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    26/44

    The benefits of LearningOutcomes

    Help to explain more clearly to students what isexpected of them and thus help to guide them in theirstudies.

    Help teachers to focus more clearly on what exactly

    they want students to achieve in terms of knowledgeand skills.

    Help teachers to define the assessment criteria moreeffectively.

    Help to provide guidance to employers about theknowledge and understanding possessed by graduatesof programmes.

    Help to start discussion on teaching and learning inthird level institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    27/44

    Potential problems withLearning Outcomes

    Could limit learning if learning outcomes writtenwithin a very narrow framework lack ofintellectual challenge to learners.

    Learning outcomes should not be reductionist butrather expansive and intended to promote thehigher order thinking skills.

    Danger of assessment-driven curriculum if

    learning outcomes too confined. Could give rise to confusion among students and

    staff if guidelines not adhered to when drawingup learning outcomes, etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    28/44

    Learning Outcomes(summary)

    Discussions at European and national level

    highlight the need for common ground withrespect to LO this does not imply thattheir need to be a common approach todefining and using LO.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    29/44

    Where LO can be found

    LearningOutcomes

    Occupational

    standards

    Assessmentcriteria

    QualificationsQualificationsframework

    Curricula

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    30/44

    TO PRACTICE

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    31/44

    What is your experience/theexperience of your university

    with learning outcomes?

    Have learning outcomes being

    introduced at your university?

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    32/44

    Practical advice for writing

    learning outcomes (I) Begin each learning outcome with an action verb.

    Use only one verbper learning outcome.

    Avoid vague terms like know, understand, learn, be familiar with,be exposed to, be acquainted with, and be aware of. These terms

    are associated with teaching objectives rather than learningoutcomes.

    Avoid complicated sentences. If necessary use more one thanone sentence to ensure clarity.

    Ensure that the learning outcomes of the module relateto the

    overall outcomes of the program. General recommendation: 5 8 learning outcomes per module.

    The learning outcomes must be observableand measurable.

    Ensure that the learning outcomes are capable of beingassessed.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    33/44

    Practical advice for writing

    learning outcomes (II) Timescale: ask yourself if it is realistic to achieve the LO within

    the time and resources available.

    Assessment: How will you know if the student has achieved theselearning outcomes? Very broad LO may be difficult to assess

    effectively. With very narrow LO, the list of learning outcomesmay be too long and detailed.

    Before finalizing the learning outcomes, ask your colleagues andpossibly (former) students if the LO make sense to them.

    When writing LO for students at levels beyond first year, try toavoid overloading the list with learning outcomes which are drawnfrom the bottom of Blooms taxonomy.

    It is vital that learning outcomes are clearly written so that theyare understood by students, colleagues and external examiners.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    34/44

    Checklist for writing learning

    outcomes for modules Have I begun each outcome with an active verb?

    Are my outcomes SMART: specific, measurable,acceptable, realistic, time-limited?

    Do all the outcomes fit within the aims andcontent of the module/program?

    Bloom recommends to avoid terms like know,understand, learn, be familiar with, be exposed

    to, be acquainted with, be aware of andappreciate

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    35/44

    GROUP WORK

    Writing Learning Outcomes

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    36/44

    ASSESSMENT

    -> STEPS involved in linking LearningOutcomes, Teaching and Learning Activities

    and Assessment

    Clearly define the learning outcomes.

    Select teaching and learning methods that arelikely to ensure that the learning outcomes areachieved.

    Choose a technique or techniques to assess the

    achievement of the learning outcomes.

    Assess the learning outcomes and check to seehow well they match with what was intended

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    37/44

    Linking Learning Outcomesand Assessment Criteria

    Learning outcomes imply the assessmentcriteria!

    Assessment criteria may be developed from thelearning outcome or from the assessment task

    but in either case they should relate to thelearning outcome

    Assessment criteria should test, assess orrelate to the learning that is mentioned in

    the learning outcome. e.g if you say studentsmust write something, you should not testthem orally.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    38/44

    What forms of assessment

    (tests/exams)do you use?

    When the student has passed eachcourse can you be sure that he/she

    also achieved the Learning Outcome(s)of the programme?

    (QANU)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    39/44

    Testing your assessment

    - Statistics (test the tests)

    - Four eyes- applied to construction of the test as well as theassessment

    - External reviewers, not the teachers themselves butindependent reviewers

    - Answer models that describe what kind of answer youexpect on an essay question, what elements should be partof it, which concepts should be named and how you weighthese aspects in the final mark

    - Assessment forms to be used for theses, reports etc.

    (QANU)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    40/44

    Sum up

    - Back to the question: How to assess if the studentshave reached the LOs of the whole programme?

    - What if all the courses are assessed by multiple choice

    exams?

    - What if all the courses ask the students to give an oralpresentation and never a paper or another kind ofwritten report?

    - How to assess group work?

    (QANU)

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    41/44

    Sum up

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    42/44

    Further reading

    Jenny Moon, Exeter University: Linking Levels, LearningOutcomes and Assessment Criteria.

    http://www.aic.lv/bolona/Bologna/Bol_semin/Edinburgh/J_Moon_backgrP.pdf

    Kennedy, D. et.al.: Writing and Using LearningOutcomes: a Practical Guide.http://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdf

    John Biggs: Aligning teaching and assessing to courseobjectives. Teaching and Learning in HigherEducation: New Trends and Innovations. University ofAveiro, 2003

    http://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdfhttp://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdfhttp://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdfhttp://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdfhttp://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdfhttp://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdf
  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    43/44

    Next steps in WP 4?

    4.1 Intended learning outcomes for MA and BA: The nextstep of the project would be to design and developintended LOs drawing on the SQFs for informatics andmanagement.

    4.2 Peer-review by EU partners

    4.3 Methodology of developing LOs: To ensure widerapplication of the methodology, guidelines on the LOdevelopmentwill be developed.

    4.4 Adapted versions of the LOs for MA and BA: PCuniversities will adapt the LO to the local needs. The adaptedversions will be circulated among the stakeholders forfeedback, the LOs will be refinedand prepared forpublications.

  • 8/13/2019 Learning Outcomes from Theory to Practice

    44/44

    Thank you for your attention!