Lecture 1 - Asia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    1/29

    Asia Pacific BusinessLECTURE 1

    Ishtiaq P. MahmoodNUS Business School

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    2/29

    What is Asia? What dowe mean by Asianbusiness?

    Why do we want to learnabout business in Asia?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    3/29

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    4/29

    Emerging Asia vs. Re-emerging Asia?

    India accounted for 33% of the world economy in

    1 AD. Indias share was three times the share of Western Europe and was much larger than that of the Roman Empire as a whole (21.5%). In otherwords, India was by far the worlds economicsuperpower at that time.

    In 1000 AD, Chinas economy was 23% of theworld economy. By 1500 it was the same size asIndias and thereafter has always remainedsignificantly larger.

    Angus Madison

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    5/29

    Asia in historical context

    33%75%Asia

    45%15%W. EU, US, Aus,Canada

    1992

    19%66%Asia

    56%17%W. EU, US, Aus,Canada

    1950

    58%66%Asia

    25%14%W. EU, US, Aus,Canada

    1820

    Income Population RegionYear

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    6/29

    Japan, The dragons, China, India, Southeast Asia What is driving Asias dynamism?

    Free market /Government tinkering (Ghana vs. Korea) Big business/ Networks of SMEs (Korea vs. Taiwan)

    Will Asia be able to sustain its economiccompetitiveness?

    Working hard (perspiration) vs. working smart (inspiration) The Asian Financial Crisis/ Sub-prime Crisis Is economic competitiveness is the only thing to care about?

    Asia-Pacific has been the most dynamic part of the world since the 1960s

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    7/29

    Productivity

    Innovative Capacity

    Competitiveness

    Innovation is more than just scientific discovery

    There are no low-tech industries , only low-tech firms

    Prosperity

    What is competitiveness?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    8/29

    What makes countries competitive?

    Solid macro-foundation Trade regime: Ghana vs. S. Korea FDI regime: Is FDI always good? FPI regime: Is free movement of capital a good

    thing?

    How about Free movement of labor?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    9/29

    But ultimately countries are competitive

    because the companies in those countries arecompetitive

    What makes firms competitive? Internal: firm competence and resources

    Does competence that work in one context also work in another context? (Guanxi)

    External competition: the structure of theindustry in which the firms operate

    Multi-domestic vs. global business (role of

    government)

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    10/29

    LONG TERM INDUSTRY PROFITABILITY

    G o v e r n m e n tPol icy

    I M PACT OF GOVERNM EN T ON

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    11/29

    Strategy is about how to align the internal

    competence with the external rules of the game

    How universal are the strategic wisdoms wetake for granted?

    Samsung vs. Sony

    Diversification vs. focusCentralized leadership vs.

    decentralization

    Family ties vs. professionalmanagers

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    12/29

    A quick recap

    If countries are competitive because thefirms are competitive, what makes firmscompetitive?

    Firm strategy and resources Industry structure Macro-economic foundations Also, the location of the firms (the clusters)

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    13/29

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    14/29

    Messo: Clusters & Competitiveness

    Firms are more competitive if they are partof clusters What will it take for Asia to develop successful

    bio-tech clusters/ education clusters/ moviesclusters, etc.?

    Should government be the one to initiatecluster-development? Does the govt. have the ability to pick winners?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    15/29

    Specialization of Regional EconomiesSelect U.S. Geographic Areas

    BostonAnalytical InstrumentsEducation and Knowledge CreationCommunications Equipment

    Los Angeles Area

    ApparelBuilding Fixtures,

    Equipment andServices

    Entertainment

    ChicagoCommunications EquipmentProcessed FoodHeavy Machinery

    Denver, COLeather and Sporting GoodsOil and GasAerospace Vehicles and Defense

    San DiegoLeather and Sporting GoodsPower GenerationEducation and KnowledgeCreation

    San Francisco-Oakland-San JoseBay AreaCommunicationsEquipmentAgriculturalProductsInformationTechnology

    Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WAAerospace Vehicles andDefenseFishing and FishingProductsAnalytical Instruments

    HoustonHeavy Construction ServicesOil and GasAerospace Vehicles and Defense

    Pittsburgh, PAConstruction MaterialsMetal ManufacturingEducation and Knowledge

    Creation

    Atlanta, GAConstruction MaterialsTransportation and LogisticsBusiness Services

    Raleigh-Durham, NCCommunications EquipmentInformation TechnologyEducation andKnowledge Creation

    Wichita, KSAerospace Vehicles and

    Defense

    Heavy MachineryOil and Gas

    Note: Clusters listed are the three highest ranking clusters in terms of share of national employmentSource: Cluster Mapping Project, Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    16/29

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    17/29

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    18/29

    Process of Economic ReformThe Reinforcement of Macro and Micro Reforms

    Macroeconomicreform

    Microeconomicreform

    Create opportunityfor productivity

    Required to achieveproductivity

    Productivity growth allowseconomic growth without inflation,

    making macroeconomic stability

    easier to achieve

    Stability and confidence supportinvestment and upgrading

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    19/29

    But clusters dont develop out of nothing, contexts matter

    Macroeconomic contexts provide the hardinfrastructure Is free market the way to go to develop

    competitiveness?

    Culture provides the soft infrastructure

    Can Asians think? Does political freedom matter for

    competitiveness?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    20/29

    The 5C

    Competence (firm) Competition (industry)

    Cluster (location) Context Culture

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    21/29

    RecapWEEK 14

    Southeast AsiaWEEK 13

    IndiaWEEK 12

    ChinaWEEK 11TaiwanWEEK 10

    KoreaWEEK 9

    JapanWEEK 8INDIVIDUALCOUNTRY CASES+ VIDEOS

    InnovationWEEK 7

    Diversification& Groups

    WEEK 6MICRO

    Culture& Politics

    WEEK 5

    InternationalFinance

    WEEK 4

    FDIWEEK 3

    TradeWEEK 2MACROINSTITUTIONALCONTEXT

    IntroWEEK 1

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    22/29

    China: Some Mind-benders

    1. Exactly, how well has China done? Howsustainable is Chinas growth?

    2. What does China need to do in order tosustain its dynamism?

    3. Can China open up economically withoutopening up politically?

    4. Can other emerging economies emulatethe Chinese miracle?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    23/29

    Can India overtake China?

    1. Is India rising?

    2. Why was India left behind?3. What explains Indias recent

    competitiveness in IT?4. Can the service sector lift India out of its

    poverty?

    5. Can the US lose its dominance in IT thesame way it did in electronicsmanufacturing? Andy Grove

    6. Can India overtake China?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    24/29

    Japan: Some issues to ponder 1. What explains the immense popularity of

    Japanese pop culture across the globe (Japaneseanime, hello kitty, TV drama, J-pop). How can asociety so bound by norm and discipline such asJapan still come up with innovative concepts (cup

    noodle, karaoke)?2. Are the problems confronting todays Japanuniquely Japanese? Can Japan beat off low costcompetition from China and other emergingeconomies?

    3. Can Japan maintain its technological edge with itscurrent immigration policy?

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    25/29

    Geographic Influences on Competitiveness

    Broad Economic Areas

    Groups of NeighboringNations

    Regions

    Clusters

    Nations

    World Economy

    Economicdevelopmentis acceleratedby concertedaction at allfour levels

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    26/29

    Warning

    The outline and case sequence may change slightly due toAvailability of new case/ article/ videos, etc.

    You should regularly check the course platform

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    27/29

    Class Process: What to Expect A course about ideas

    The answer is less important than thethinking process

    interdisciplinary approach to a complex subjectmeans that you have to get used to a lessstructured approach

    Preparation Readings (E-reserves)

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    28/29

    Source: US Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov). Authors analysis.

    Annual U.S. patentsper 1 million

    population, 2001

    Compound annual growth rate of US-registered patents, 1990 - 2001

    International Patenting Output

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

    Australia

    Canada

    Germany

    Japan

    South Korea

    New Zealand

    Singapore

    Sweden

    Taiwan

    UK

    Israel

    = 10,000patentsgranted in2001

    US

    Finland

    Switzerland

    NetherlandsNorway

  • 7/31/2019 Lecture 1 - Asia

    29/29

    US Patents Granted to Country's Inventors: 1970-99The main numbers indicates the number of US patents granted for inventions made in

    these countries in the indicated time period. The number in brackets indicates the number

    of these patents that are owned by domestic entities for the country in question.

    56(49)

    15(13)

    11(9)

    7(5)

    3(1)

    4(4)Thailand

    89(45)

    43(20)

    13(7)

    6(5)

    13(10)

    2(2)Malaysia

    18(12)

    26(19)

    10(7)

    5(4)

    5(4)

    19(6)Indonesia

    332(263)

    239(211)

    129(112)

    7(6)

    2(2)

    61(52)China

    316(237)

    126(74)

    64(33)

    40(24)

    67(37)

    83(37)India

    Emerging Asian Economies

    499

    (287)

    148

    (59)

    47

    (39)

    20

    (15)

    9

    (5)

    21

    (10)Singapore

    570(469)

    279(237)

    177(149)

    113(94)

    75(61)

    59(45)Hong Kong

    11,366(11,278)

    2,890(2,865)

    424(418)

    91(87)

    43(36)

    24(20)South Korea

    12,366(12,148)

    5,271(5,179)

    1,772(1,738)

    397(386)

    176(170)

    1(1)Taiwan (ROC)

    Newly IndustrializedEconomies

    1995-991990-941985-891980-841975-791970-74Recipient Countries