Lecture 2a- Relationships

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    1/26

    Lecture 2a

    Relationships

    1

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    2/26

    Relationships

    RM theory suggest that relationships add quality to marketing

    transactions (Mitchell 2001, p.33).

    Real human exchange is much richer than market exchange

    They not only exchange money for goods, they share ideas, opinions,information and insights

    They have a say. They tend to form affections, bonds, ties of loyalty, feelings ofobligation and so on.

    They share and exchange values

    The people whose values are most in tune with those around them tend to formthe strongest, most supportive bonds (attachment / link /friendship) with otherpeople.

    2

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    3/26

    Relationships Forming

    Are consumers equally interested in building and

    sustaining relationships as companies?

    Two characteristics must be present for an exchange

    situation to be described as relationship (Barnes andHowlett 1998, p.16):

    The relationship is mutuallyperceived to exist and

    is acknowledge as such by both parties

    The relationship goes beyond occasional contact

    and is recognized as having some special status

    3

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    4/26

    Relationships Forming

    -

    Contd

    According to Palmer, regardless of what m

    arketing

    strategies are implemented by the supplier, buyers

    frequently have no wish to enter into a relationship

    with a company.

    It is probable that situations exist where the seller

    may want to develop relationship whereas the

    customer is happier with a transactional approach

    (Bund-Jackson, 1985, p.34)

    4

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    5/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Organizational relationships

    Can an individual customer have relationships with

    organizations or relationships must always be interpersonal?

    Although social relationships are always between

    individuals (employees) but the customersupplier

    (company) relationships (of whatever level or closeness)

    frequently continue despite the loss of any organizational

    personnel initially involved.

    5

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    6/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Organizational relationships (Contd)

    If an employee leaves then human capital is lost. Embedded

    knowledge, however, is part of structural (construction/organization)

    capitalthat does not disappear with the employee and is, in effect

    owned by the company. E.g. clubs or charities

    In the case of football clubs individual fans may be deeply

    attached to a particular player until they leave for another club.

    6

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    7/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Learning relationships

    Are relationships built on knowledge?

    When customers tell a company something about themselves,

    then it is the responsibility of the company to customize its offeringto that customer. From that point the relationship has started

    The more the customer tells the company, the more valuable

    they become provided the company continues to adapt its product

    or service to meet the more and more specific customer needs.

    Developing competitive advantage identifies relationship

    learning as an important way to create differential advantage

    7

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    8/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Motivational Investments

    Four types of active relationships in addition to no

    exchange:

    Bilateral relationships (both parties are motivated highly enough toinvest in a relationship)

    Seller-maintained relationships

    Buyer-maintained relationships

    Discrete exchanges (are low-involvement, purely transactionalrelationships)

    8

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    9/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Higher-level relationships

    Higher level and closer relationships are more common

    in business to business environments.

    We shall discuss in detail when we are studying

    chapters 8 and 9.

    9

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    10/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Relationship loyalty

    The phrase loyalty marketing is frequently used

    interchangeably with RM. It is used for developing

    sustainable competitive advantage.

    Assumption:

    loyalty translates into an unspecified number of

    repeat purchases from the same supplier over a

    specified period (Kendrick, 1998)

    10

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    11/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Defining loyalty

    A more comprehensive definition of loyalty may be:

    The biased (i.e.-random) behavioral response (i.e.re-visit), expressed over time, by some decision-

    making unit with respect to one (supplier) out of a set

    of (suppliers) which is a function of psychological

    (decision making and evaluative)processes resulting in

    brand comm i tment (bloemer and de Ruyter, 1998,

    p.500)

    11

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    12/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Antecedents (past history) to loyalty

    Read text book page 41

    Both customer loyalty models described in page 41

    suggested that customer satisfaction sustains loyalty.

    12

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    13/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty-Type Behavior

    Three ways of considering customer re-patronizing

    behavior (Uncles 1994, p.342):

    Switching behavior (The customer turns against you)

    Promiscuous behavior (The customer flits among an array ofalternatives)

    Polygamous behavior (The customer may be more or less loyal toyour brand than any other)

    13

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    14/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty Schemes

    Customers actively seek an involving relationship with their

    brand which in turn offers psychological reassurancesto the

    buyer and creates a sense of belonging.

    The proposed benefit of loyalty schemes,for loyal and

    heavy or frequent customers, is having this sense of

    belonging reinforced(Uncles,1994, p.341).

    Switching behavior (The customer turns against you)

    14

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    15/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty Schemes (Contd)

    Goal of loyalty programs (Bolton et al, 2000, p.95):

    to establish a higher level of customer retention

    to increase customer satisfaction

    to add value to customers

    15

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    16/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty Schemes (Contd)

    Motives for setting up loyalty schemes (Hart et al, 1999, p.

    546):

    Building lasting relationships with customers by rewardingthem for their patronage

    Gaining higher profits through extended product usage

    and cross-selling

    Gathering customer data (and development into

    information)

    16

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    17/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty Schemes (Contd)

    De-commodifying brands (i.e. differentiate from the

    crowd)

    Defending market position (against a competitors

    loyalty schemes)

    Pre-empting (anticipate/block) competitive activity

    17

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    18/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty Schemes (Contd)

    Would companies do something intelligent with the

    information they collected from customers?

    When a company hand a customer a loyalty card, the

    company immediately create the expectation in the

    mind of the consumer that the company is now going to

    study their behavior and that, in return, they expect thesupplier to do something intelligent with that information

    (Kelly, 2000, p.263).

    18

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    19/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Loyalty in Context

    Do costs outweigh advantages in loyalty programs?

    According to OMalley, loyalty programs:

    arenot much more than sophisticated sales

    promotion

    According to Ward et al., 1998,p.85:are reinforcing mechanisms

    they reward the already loyal rather than anyone

    else

    19

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    20/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Unrealistic Relational Development

    Why would a buyer avoid having a

    relationship with the supplier?

    Unrealistic customer relationship development:

    According to Palmer (1996,p.20), a number of unrealistic customer

    scenarios exist:

    where there is no reason why, or little likelihood that, a

    buyer will purchase again from a supplier.

    20

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    21/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Unrealistic Relational Development (contd)

    where buyers want to avoid a relationship as it may lead to

    dependency on a seller

    where buying processes are formalized in a way that prevents

    either party development relationships based on social bonds

    where a buyers confidence lowers the need for risk reduction

    where the costs associated with a relationship put the buyer at a

    cost disadvantage in a price-sensitive market.

    21

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    22/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Low Likelihood of Repurchase

    A buyer who is unlikely ever to re-patronize a supplier

    will:

    see no benefit from relationship formulation and

    be annoyed by the tactics associated with it (e.g.

    data capture)

    22

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    23/26

    Categorizing relationships

    - Dependency Avoidance

    - Formalized Contracts

    - Low-risk situations

    -Price-sensitive markets

    Read text book page 47 - 48

    23

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    24/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Unrealistic Supplier Relationship Development

    Why would suppliers avoid

    developing relationship with buyers?

    Scenarios whereby suppliers are avoiding a relationship:

    where there is no reason why a seller would ever see

    a buyer again

    where a seller seeks to avoid a relationship in which

    it becomes dependent on a buyer

    24

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    25/26

    Categorizing relationships

    Unrealistic Supplier Relationship Development(Contd)

    where buying processes become formalized in a way that

    prevents either party developing relationships based on social

    bonds

    where the seller has little opportunity to develop relationships

    due to the undifferentiated nature of the market

    where the ethos of the industry makes relationship-building

    inappropriate

    25

  • 8/11/2019 Lecture 2a- Relationships

    26/26

    Categorizing relationships

    - Low likelihood of repurchase

    - Dependency avoidance

    - Formalized contracts

    -Undifferentiated markets

    -Price-sensitive markets

    Read text book page 48 - 49

    26