Lecture 3 discourse analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    1/17

    The Relationship between Coherence & Cohesion

    Types of Coherence

    Types of Cohesion

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    1

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    2/17

    2

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    The Relationship between

    Coherence & Cohesion

    Widdowson (1978) makes a distinction between cohesion andcoherence. According to him,

    - Cohesion refers to how sentences and parts of sentences are

    combined by using overt lexico-grammatical signals to ensure

    that there is propositional development in the discourse.

    - Coherence has to do with the relationship between

    illocutionary acts (the intended meaning of the utterance by the speaker)

    and their function.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    3/17

    3

    Halliday and Hasan (1976):

    -Cohesion refers to the linguistic devices by which the speaker

    can signal the experiential (ideational) and interpersonal

    coherence of the text, and is thus a textual phenomenon.

    - Coherence is in the mind of the writer and reader: it is a

    mental phenomenon and cannot be identified or quantified in

    the same way as cohesion.

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    4/17

    4

    John (1986) distinguishes between two types of Coherence:

    -Text-based coherence and reader-based coherence.

    -Text-based coherence is seen as an internal feature of text:

    how sentences are linked (cohesion) or how propositions in the

    text are related to each other (sticking to the points).

    Text-based coherence has to meet the following conditions:

    1. Unity of ideas (each idea is related to the main idea).

    2. Organization of points (logical sequence of points).

    3. Link and reference (cohesion).

    Types of Coherence

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    5/17

    5

    Reader based coherence does not reflect the internal

    structure of the text but it is related to the meaningful aspect of

    writer-reader interaction via the text.

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    6/17

    6

    My father once bought a Lincoln. He did it by saving every

    penny he could. That car would be worth a fortune today.

    However, he sold it to help pay for my college education.

    Sometimes, I thinkId rather have the Lincoln;

    My father bought a Lincoln. The car driven by the police was

    red. Red doesnt suit her. She wrote three letters. However, a

    letter isnt as fast as an e-mail message and, you know, my

    mailing box is full of spam.

    Read the following and discuss them

    in terms of cohesion and coherence:

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    7/177

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    Many Linguists like Widdowson, Brown, Yule and Cook hold

    the view that coherence can be achieved even in the absence

    of cohesion, as is the case in the following example:

    Speaker A: Thats the telephone.Speaker B: Im in the bath.

    Speaker A: O.K. (Widdowson 1978:29)

    Can coherence be achieved in

    the absence of Cohesion ?

    Widdowson suggests that we are able to recognize this text as

    coherent by creating a context and then identifying the functions

    that each utterance fulfils within that context. Most native speakers

    would create a domestic situational context in which the following

    functions are assigned to each utterance:

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    8/178

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    Utterance FunctionA: Thats the telephone. Request

    B: Im in the bath. Excuse

    A: Ok. Acceptance of excuse

    Thus in creating a meaningful context and identifying the

    functions of each utterance, coherence is established.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    9/179

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    Types of Cohesion

    Halliday and Hassan (1976) categorized cohesion into two

    cohesive devices: Lexical cohesion and Grammatical cohesion

    1. Lexical cohesion: They are divided into reiteration and

    collocation

    a. Reiteration: the occurrence of the lexical item for a second time

    in a text.

    i. Repetition of the same word.

    - There was a horrible explosion in Boston last month. The explosion

    claimed the life of many people.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    10/1710

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    ii. The use of synonymy or near-synonymy.

    -The man reached the top of the mountain. The peak was covered

    with snow.

    iii. Superordinator .

    - I bought a new Mercedes. The car cost a lot of money.

    iv. General word.

    - Mosquitoesand flies are hated by all people. These creatures are

    harmful.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    11/1711

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    b. Collocation: words that tend to occur together in a text.

    -At night, people usually sleep. But, during the daythey stay awake.

    - In the morning, Huda went to the library, There she read a book and a

    journal.

    2. Grammatical cohesion: They are divided into reference,

    substitution, ellipses and conjunction

    a. Reference:

    i. anaphoric & cataphoric

    Anaphoric reference is a backward pointing in a text.

    - Maher is married. He has got two kids. (personal pronoun)

    - I visitedAden. There I met my old friend, Adnan.) (adverb of place)

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    12/17

    12

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    cataphoric reference is a foreward pointing in a text.

    -The story goes like this.Ali attacked the thief but the thief stabbed him .

    I dont believe it. Nawals jewels have been stolen.

    ii. Demonstrative reference

    - The demonstrative pronouns (this, that, these, those)

    I dont like tigers. These are wild animals.

    - The Definite article (the)

    Saeed bought a new car. The car attracts everyone.- The adverbs (here, there, now, then)

    Asma visited Jeddah last month. She met her fatherthere.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    13/17

    13

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    iii. Comparative reference

    - The boy had a car accident yesterday. He broke his leg. The other

    problem is that he got a fracture in his arm. Such problems mean that

    he would stay in hospital for several weeks. A differentproblem is that

    he damaged his car. Something else happened to him. He broke the

    lenses of his pair of glasses.

    -A: Would you like this seat.

    B: No thanks, Id preferthe otherone.

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    14/17

    14

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    b. Substitution: refers to the process of replacing one element by another

    in the text. (one, ones, so, not, the same, do)

    i. Nominal

    -My car is very old. I should buy a new one.

    -The man bought a raincoat. His wife bought the same.

    ii. Verbal

    - A: Did you visit the zoo in Al-Baha? B: Yes, I did.

    - A: Do women like gossiping? B: Yes, they doiii. Clausal

    - A: Has the dean finished the meeting. B: Yes, I think so.

    - A: All the students got few marks in the test. B: I hope not.

    l

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    15/17

    15

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    c. Ellipsis: refers to the process of replacing one element by nothing in the text.

    i. Nominal

    ii. Verbal- A: Will you go to the shop and buy

    some biscuit?

    B: Hameed will ..

    iii. Clausal

    -- A:The market is full of varieties

    of oranges.

    B: Lets buy some ..

    -- A: Were you reading Syntax

    yesterday?

    B: Yes,I was ..

    -- A: I bought two pens.

    B: Could you lend me one ..

    A: Yes, of course.

    - A: Why are many students absent

    today?

    B: I dont know why ..

    -- A: Will you help me make tea?

    B: Of course ..

    A l

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    16/17

    16

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    e. Conjunction: deals with the logical and semantic relation in the text.

    (then, but, similarly, as a result, next, in addition, however, therefore)

    i. Additive: indicates additional information in the text.

    -The child broke a glass. He also damaged a plate.

    -Hana studied hard last month. Similarly, Sarah spent her time reading in the

    library.

    ii. Adversative: shows a contrast between two portions of the text.

    - I went for a walk with my friend Belal yesterday. When it began raining I took

    , Belal preferred to walk in the rain.Howevera taxi home.

    , she didnt pass.YetArwa worked very hard for the exam.-

    Di A l i

  • 7/29/2019 Lecture 3 discourse analysis

    17/17

    17

    Dr. Hameed Al-ZubeiryDiscourse Analysis

    iii. Causal: shows cause and effectrelation in the text.

    , they wereAs a resultTwo students were fighting in the class yesterday.-

    dismissed from the college.

    , Classes wereBecause of thisLast week it rained heavily in Baljurashi.-

    suspended.

    iii. Temporal: shows a sequential time link or chronological order in the

    text.

    , put it onThenfill a kettle with some water.firstIn order to make a cup of tea,-

    , add some sugar, tea and milk.After thatfire till it boils.