42
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing

GISC-3325

5 February 2009

Page 2: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Update

• Next class and lab will be on OPUS and GPS processing using OPUS.

• First exam on 12 February 2009.– Chapters 1-4 and all lectures and labs.– Will take place during Lab period at CI229

• Lab 3 – Automated GPS processing and review due on 10 February 2009.

Page 3: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Reminder

• You are responsible for the material listed as REQUIRED ADDITIONAL READING in the Class 5 section of the web page.

Page 4: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer

Page 5: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 6: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 7: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 8: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Earth’s Gravity Field from Space• Satellite data was

used for global models– Only useful at

wavelengths of 700 km or longer

• Shorter wavelength data from terrestrial or marine gravity of varying vintage, quality and geographic coverage

Terrestrial and marine gravity data in NGS data base.

Page 9: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Note the discontinuity at the shoreline.

Page 10: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 11: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GRAD-D

Page 12: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 13: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 14: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Gravity

• Static gravity field – Based on long-term average within Earth

system

• Temporally changing component– Motion of water and air– Time scale ranges from hours to decades.

• Mean and time variable gravity field affect the motion of all Earth space vehicles.

Page 15: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 16: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

• Is the vector sum of gravitational and centrifugal acceleration.

• The actual acceleration of gravity varies from place to place, depending on latitude, altitude, and local geology.

• By agreement among physicists, the standard acceleration of gravity gn is defined to be exactly 9.80665 meters per second per second (m s-2), or about 32.174 05 feet per second per second.

Gravitational Attraction

Page 17: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

• Magnitude of the potential is the work that must be done by gravity to move a unit mass from infinity to the point of interest.

• Is dependent on position within the gravitation field.

Gravitational Potential

Page 18: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

• Surface having constant gravity potential NOT constant gravity.– Also known as level surfaces or

geopotential surfaces.

• Surfaces are perpendicular at all points of the plumb line (gravity vector).

• A still lake surface is an equipotential surface. – It is not horizontal but curved.

Equipotential Surfaces

Page 19: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Geoid

• The equipotential surface of the Earth's gravity field which best fits, in a least squares sense, global mean sea level.

Page 20: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Image from Featherstone, W, “Height Systems and Vertical Datums” Spatial Science, Vol 51 No. 1, June 2006

Page 21: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

• They are closed continuous surfaces that never cross one another.

• They are formed by long radius arcs. Generally without abrupt steps.

• They are convex everywhere.

Properties of equipotential surfaces

Page 22: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Geopotential Number

• C (geopotential number) – is a value derived from the difference in gravity potential between an equipotential surface of interest and the geoid.

• Represents the work required to move a 1kg mass from the geoid to the geopotential surface at the point of interest.

• C is numerically similar to the elevation of the point in meters.

Page 23: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Leveling Issues

• Height – The distance measured along a perpendicular

between a point and a reference surface.

• Raw leveled heights– Non-unique. Depending on the path taken a

different height will be determined for the same point. They have NO physical relevance.

Page 24: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 25: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 26: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Equipotential Surfaces

HCHA

Reference Surface (Geoid)

HAC hAB + hBC

Observed difference in orthometric height, H, depends on the leveling route.

AC

B Topography

hAB

h = local leveled differences

Leveled Height vs. Orthometric Height

= hBC

H = relative orthometric heights

Page 27: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

• Vertical distance from the geoid to the point of interest. (along curved plumb line).

• Orthometric height (H) may be determined from H = geopotential number / mean gravity along plumb line– We use assumptions about mass density to

estimate mean gravity.

Orthometric Height

Page 28: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Geopotential Numbers

• Geopotential numbers– Unique, path-independent– Geopotential number (C) at a point of interest

(p) is the difference between the potential on the geoid and potential at the point.

• C = W0-Wp

Page 29: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 30: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Review of Height Systems• Helmert Orthometric• NAVD 88

• local gravity field ( )• single datum point• follows MSL

g

HC

g

C

g H

g gh

G H

0 0 4 2 41

23

.

Page 31: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

How are they computed?

Page 32: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Dynamic Heights

• Takes the geopotential number at a point and divides it by a constant gravity value.

• The constant value used in the US is the normal gravity value at 45 degrees N latitude – 980.6199 gals

Page 33: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

CC area Dynamic Heights

NAVD 88 and dynamic heights differ by only 1 mm at this station.

Page 34: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Dynamic Heights

NAVD 88 = 2026.545 m

DYN Hght= 2023.109

Difference = 3.436 m

Page 35: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 36: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Error condition: input position is inconsistent with predicted one.

Page 37: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 38: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Dynamic Height Problems

• Dynamic height corrections applied to spirit-leveled height differences can be very large (several meters) if the chosen gravity value is not representative for the region of operation.

Page 39: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Orthometric correction

• Occurs because equipotential surfaces are not parallel.

• In general, not parallel in a N-S direction but they are parallel in an E-W direction.

• It is computed as a function of mean orthometric height and latitude of section.

Page 40: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

Leveled v Ortho. Height Diffs

• Due to non-parallelism of level surfaces the differences between published NAVD 88 points do not correspond to the leveled height difference.

• Therefore the subtraction of the published NAVD 88 heights on the NGS datasheets will NOT agree with the leveled difference.

• This is problem mostly in high elevations.

Page 41: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009
Page 42: Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC-3325 5 February 2009

An example from Colorado

• The difference between published NAVD 88 heights is 402.156 m.

• The leveled difference is 402.085 m.