Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    1/29

    Dynamic Soil Properties

    Part - I

    Lecture-21

    1

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    2/29

    There are several types of geotechnical engineering problems associated

    with dynamic loading, examples include:

    wave propagationmachine vibrationsseismic loadingliquefaction and cyclic transient loading

    The mechanical properties associated with dynamic loading are termeddynamic soil properties and are listed below.

    Density ( ) : mass per unit volumeshear wave velocity (V s): At ground surface, most energy arrives in the

    form of vertically propagating shear waves. Velocity of these waves insoil is measured from field/laboratory studies.

    Shear modulus (G): ratio of shear stress to shear strainDamping ratio (D): ratio of actual damping coefficient to the critical

    damping coefficient.Poissons ratio (n): ratio of lateral strain to longitudinal strain

    Important Dynamic Properties of Soils

    2

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    3/29

    Measurement of Dynamic Properties of Soils

    Dynamic properties of soils can be measured from in-situ as well aslaboratory tests.

    The Field or in-situ tests have the advantage that the state of stress isinherently included in the procedure. However, laboratory tests need toconfine and consolidate the soil sample back to the state of stress to

    replicate field conditions. Also getting undisturbed samples for loosesoils is almost impossible and the in-situ structure of the soil getsdisturbed in lab tests. Also there are sample size effects in lab tests.

    Laboratory tests are particularly useful when the responses undercontrolled conditions are needed, creating which is not possible in field.

    Also to study the influence of different parameters on the response, labtests are conducted.

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    4/29

    Dynamic Properties of Soils: v s

    Shear wave velocity (V s) is the most commonly usedparameter used in soil characterization. It is used tocalculate several other parameters like density and shear

    modulus in the elastic range of soil behavior.The importance in its utility is that the particle of motiontravels perpendicular to the direction of wave propagationand we are able to measure the shear properties of the soil

    skeleton and not the fluids that cannot take shear.

    4

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    5/29

    Dynamic Properties of Soils: GShear Modulus (G) is a calculated parameter based on the V s using thesimple elastic relationship

    Gmax = Vs2

    The mass density is often estimated or measured by a nearby subsurfacesampling or using correlations.

    Advanced correlations to estimate the value of the dynamic shearmodulus are available based on the standard penetration test, AtterbergLimits (plasticity index) and grain size distributions. The shear modulus isused to perform more advanced soil modeling, and dynamic response ofthe soil-structure interactions.

    Shear modulus at low strain levels as measured by geophysicaltechniques will provide the elastic parameter for machine foundationanalysis or earthquake engineering.

    G can be used as a varying parameter with respect to strain, making thesoil response represent the real modulus degradation in soil behavior.

    This parameter is used in defining the stiffness matrices for finiteelement analysis of earth structures and foundation soils. 5

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    6/29

    Dynamic Properties of Soils: D

    Damping Ratio (D) is used in several dynamic analysis procedures to providea realistic motion attenuation. This ratio is based on the material dampingproperties.

    The damping ratio vs. shear strain relationships for cohesionless andcohesive soils are provided by many researchers.

    Since damping ratio is also shear strain dependent, it is required to haveseveral values with strain. Dynamic analysis results are also influenced bythe damping ratio. The effects of soil-structure interaction also influence thedamping of the system making it an area where recent research has focused.

    The utility of this parameter is based on the ability of the system to absorbdynamic energy and how this will affect the duration and modes ofvibration.

    6

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    7/29

    Dynamic Properties of Soils:

    Poissons Ratio ( ) is a fundamental parameter that is difficult to measure and it isusually estimated in engineering calculations.

    The ratio of horizontal to vertical strain is required to relate moduli and strains in asolid body. A suggested range of values for Poisson's ratio for soils is from 0.2 to 0.5,less common values may be as low as 0.1 for loess deposits.

    This ratio can be calculated [ n = E/(2G-1)] based on laboratory tests at low strains if Gand E are obtained from torsional and longitudinal vibration respectively.

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    8/29

    Important Field tests for measuring dynamicproperties of soils

    Low strain testsSeismic Reflection Test

    Seismic Refraction Test

    Suspension Logging Test

    Steady-State-Vibration TestSpectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) Test

    Cross-Hole Test

    Down-/Up-hole Test

    High strain tests

    Seismic Cone Penetration Test

    Standard Penetration Test

    Dilatometer Test

    Pressuremeter Test8

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    9/29

    Important Laboratory tests for measuring dynamicproperties of soils

    Element Tests

    Resonant Column Test

    Ultrasonic Pulse Test

    Piezoelectric Bender Element TestCyclic Triaxial Test

    Cyclic Simple Shear Test

    Cyclic Torsion Test

    Model Tests

    Shake Table Test

    Centrifuge Test

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    10/29

    Field Tests: Low Strain Test

    (a) Vert ical Im pact (b) Shallo w Explo sive,

    (c) Horizont al Im pact (d) Frequen cy-Con tro lled Surface Waves.

    A source produces a pulse of waves, whose times of arrival aremeasured by receivers. The commonly used sources are hammer blowand explosive charges.

    10

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    11/29

    Field Tests: Low Strain Test

    Consideration of ground water table is very important for properinterpretation of results from these tests.

    P-waves travel through ground water and soft saturated soils at almost samevelocity, hence making the detection of ground water very difficult

    Failure to consider ground water effects results in overestimation of soilstiffness.

    If the impulse wave generated is S wave, this problem is solved because, Swaves can not travel through fluids and the propagation of S waves belowGWT is only through soil skeleton, thus making proper estimation of soilproperties possible.

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    12/29

    Field Tests: Low Strain Test

    Vertical hammer blows and explosive charges produce waves rich in p-wave content. Shear waves are produced by horizontal impact.

    The resolution of S-waves could be improved by using reverse polarity.This can be achieved by striking a beam tightly pressed against theground surface in opposite directions and measuring the amplitudes.

    Since the polarity of p-waves is not reversed, subtracting the reverserecord from the original will diminish the p-wave amplitude andenhance the S-wave amplitude.

    Presence of ground water table may sometimes give inaccurateresults if p-wave velocity is considered. This can be avoided by using S-

    waves which can not pass through water.

    12

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    13/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Reflection Test

    An impulse wave (rich in P-waves) is produced at the source SThe arrival time of P-wave is measured at receiver

    The impulse produces stress waves that radiate away from the source in alldirections

    Two waves are received at the receiver R1. Direct wave, which travels in direct path from S to R

    2. The other wave travels downward and reflects back after striking theinterface of two layers

    13

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    14/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Reflection Test

    2 i

    S R

    H

    x

    vp1

    Wavefront

    vp2

    14

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    15/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Reflection Test

    2 i

    S R

    H

    x

    v p1

    Wavefront

    v p2

    2 i

    S R

    H

    x

    v p1

    Wavefront

    v p2

    Time taken for direct wave to reach the receiver = t d

    Time taken for reflected wave to reach the receiver= t r

    td = x/v p1

    1

    22

    1

    2

    2

    1

    422

    velocity

    distance

    2tan

    p pr

    v

    x H

    v

    x H

    t

    H x

    i

    15

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    16/29

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    17/29

    Seismic Reflection

    By measuring x and t r and knowing v p1 from direct wave calculations, thickness ofupper layer (H) can be determined.

    If the layering is not horizontal, multiple measurements with receivers on either sideof the source are to be made to determine the layer thickness at one point and layerinclination.

    22

    1

    2

    1

    22

    2

    1

    4

    xvt H

    v x H t

    pr

    pr

    17

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    18/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    The seismic refraction method is similar to the reflection method in that the sameinstruments and shock wave sources are used and the travel time of p or s waves ismeasured at receivers placed along the ground surface at different distances from thesource.

    The advantage of refraction test over reflection test is that in refraction test, arrival time offirst wave is recorded, regardless of its path.

    18

    ill

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    19/29

    Seismic Refraction

    Vertical Geophones

    Source(Plate)

    Rock: V p2

    Soil: V p1

    oscilloscope

    x1x2x3x4

    t1t2

    t3t4

    zR

    Determine depthto rock layer, z R

    19

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    20/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    Snells law:

    The directions of all waves generated are related to the direction ofincident wave.

    When the angle of incidence is i c, the refracted wave will be parallel tothe interface. This angle i c is called critical angle of incidence

    ic = v1/v 2

    20

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    21/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    x

    Sxc

    v1

    v2

    Head waves

    Direct waves

    All receivers placed at distances greater than x c receive head waves before directwaves.

    xc is the distance at which the angle of incidence of wavefront at the interface is i c.

    21

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    22/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    22

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    23/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    i c

    S R

    H

    xn

    v1

    v2

    i c

    xn > xc

    Determine H in terms of v 1, v2 and x c

    23

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    24/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    i c

    S Rxn

    v1

    v2

    i c

    For a receiver placed at x n= xc,, thn = xc/v 1

    12

    12

    2 vv

    vv x H c

    ci

    H

    cos

    xn 2H tan i c

    2

    2

    2

    12

    121

    112

    21

    sin

    costan2

    cos

    vv

    H

    v

    xt

    vv

    i

    iv H

    vi H x

    iv H

    t

    nhn

    c

    c

    cn

    chn

    ci

    H

    cos

    24

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    25/29

    Seismic Refraction: Travel time-distance diagram

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    T r a v e

    l T i m

    e ( s e c o n

    d s

    )

    0 10 20 30 40 50Distance From Source (meters)

    Horizontal Soil Layer over Rock

    Vp1 = 1350m/s

    1

    Vp2 = 4880m/s

    1z x

    2 V V

    V Vc

    c p2 p1

    p2 p1

    Depth to Rock:

    zc = 5.65 m

    xc = 15.0 m

    x values

    t v a l u e s

    25

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    26/29

    Field Tests: Seismic Refraction Test

    For multiple horizontal layers, travel time-distance diagram will have more than

    one break in slope.The distances corresponding to break in slope and the slopes are used todetermine the thickness of layers and wave velocities in different layers.

    For the case of multiple layers,

    1

    122

    1

    221

    221

    1

    1

    2

    k

    j k k

    jk k jk k

    j

    j

    k k

    k k ck k

    vv

    vvvvvv

    v

    H

    vvvv x

    H

    26

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    27/29

    Seismic Refraction Test: Limitations

    The travel time distance curves are not exactly straight lines for realsituations of soil layers, where velocity of wave is not constant within alayer, as assumed.

    Insufficient thickness of some layers may cause difficulties in detectingthem, causing blind zones

    When velocity of top layer is high, refraction is not suitable.

    27

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    28/29

    Inclined layers: Reverse profiling

    When the boundaries between layers are not horizontal, refraction study isdone in two directions to get the thickness of layers and the inclinations.This is called Reverse Profiling

    28

  • 8/12/2019 Lecture21 Dynamic Soil Properties Part1

    29/29

    29

    Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.

    Braja M. Das, Ramana G.V. (2010) Principles of soil dynamics, C L Engineering.

    Prakash, S. (1981) Soil Dynamics, McGraw-Hill.

    Kearey P., Brooks, M. Hill I. (2002) An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration,

    Wiley-Blackwell.

    Burger H.R, Sheehan A.F., Jones, C.H. (2006)Introduction to Applied Geophysics:

    Exploring the Shallow Subsurface, W. W. Norton & Company.

    http://civil.iisc.ernet.in/~madhavi/ce202/lecture3.pdf

    References

    http://civil.iisc.ernet.in/~madhavi/ce202/lecture3.pdfhttp://civil.iisc.ernet.in/~madhavi/ce202/lecture3.pdf