81
AECOM Barangaroo Remedial Action Plan – Barangaroo South Stage 1B Waterfront Public Domain Commercial-in-Confidence 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Limited – ABN: 15 127 727 502 Appendix C Lend Lease Development Plans

Lend Lease Development Plans

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lend Lease Development Plans

AECOM Barangaroo Remedial Action Plan – Barangaroo South Stage 1B Waterfront Public Domain Commercial-in-Confidence

09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Limited – ABN: 15 127 727 502

cAppendix C

Lend Lease Development Plans

Page 2: Lend Lease Development Plans

AECOM Barangaroo Remedial Action Plan – Barangaroo South Stage 1B Waterfront Public Domain Commercial-in-Confidence

09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Limited – ABN: 15 127 727 502

dAppendix D

Ex-Situ Remediation Works

Page 3: Lend Lease Development Plans

Appendix D

P:\602X\60247139\4.RAP\14 ORWN RAP\4. Delivery\6.1 Reports\1 Draft\ORWN PD RAP\Draft 2\App D ex situ\Appendix D 9Sept2015.docx Revision – 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease – ABN: NA

1

1.0 Ex-Situ Remediation Works

1.1 Introduction As described by Section 8.0, CIM has not been identified within the Site based on the previous intrusive investigations undertaken within the Site. Section 21.7 present contingency actions that will be implemented in the event that:

- CIM requiring remediation is identified as an outcome of the additional validation works in Area A as detailed in Section 16.4.1; and/or

- treatment of excavated material as necessary to facilitate disposal to landfill.

This Appendix describes, in addition to the general excavation and materials management outlined in Section 13.0 this section outlines the proposed additional controls that will be implemented to manage materials that require treatment at the Site as well as outlining the proposed treatment methodology.

1.2 Remediation Enclosure and Emissions Control System It is proposed that ex-situ treatment of material excavated during the remediation works (if required by the additional validation sampling) will be conducted by an appropriately licenced off-site facility prior to disposal to landfill (refer to AECOM, 2015 for further details). In the unlikely event that on-site treatment is preferred, an on-site treatment facility (potentially including an RE and associated ECS, if required) will be established in a central location (approved by the BDA) and potentially coordinated with the remediation works to be undertaken within the adjacent Block 4 (as described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013a).

Operation of the RE (and ECS if required) would be in accordance with operation and maintenance management systems developed on completion of the final system design. An overview of the controls to be designed as part of the RE and ECS system is provided in Section 1.4.3 below.

1.3 Ex-situ Stabilisation Trials The following section describes bench scale trials that were undertaken for the purpose of assessing the suitability (or otherwise) of ex-situ stabilisation for treatment of gasworks related impacted material from the Barangaroo site.

1.3.1 Introduction

Enviropacific Services Pty Limited (EPS) conducted a series of Ex-situ Stabilisation Trials to assess the feasibility of treating the PAH and TPH impacted material from the Site to a standard which would facilitate either disposal to landfill or reuse at Headland Park. These works are detailed in the Ex-situ Stabilisation Trials – DECC Declaration Area, Barangaroo (Enviropacific Services, 2012).

The stabilisation trials were conducted on bulk soil samples obtained from test pits excavated in Blocks 4 and 5 and a coal tar collected from the offsite Hickson Road tar tank (BH53) in February 2010. The test pits were excavated in areas identified by historic investigations as containing gasworks contamination.

Four types of material were targeted for the Ex-situ Stabilisation Pilot Trial based on field observations:

- Lightly impacted material (LI);

- Moderately impacted material (MI);

- Heavy impacted material (HI); and

- Coal tar material (CT).

The main contaminants of concern considered by the trial were PAH and TPH. PAH, including benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), and TPH are also the contaminants on which waste classification of the material is determined as per the Waste Classification Guidelines (NSW EPA, 2014).

Page 4: Lend Lease Development Plans

Appendix D

P:\602X\60247139\4.RAP\14 ORWN RAP\4. Delivery\6.1 Reports\1 Draft\ORWN PD RAP\Draft 2\App D ex situ\Appendix D 9Sept2015.docx Revision – 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease – ABN: NA

2

1.3.2 Methodology

After collection, the bulk soil samples within each material type were composited, air-dried and mechanically mixed in order to achieve a homogeneous starting material for the stabilisation trials.

The laboratory analysis (total concentrations) indicated that all untreated material (LI, MI, HI and CT) would be classified as hazardous waste, according to the Waste Classification Guidelines (NSW EPA, 2014). This classification is based largely on exceedances of the specific contaminant concentration 2 (SCC 2) criteria of 23 mg/kg for BaP. The material types were identified as: LI = 29.6 mg/kg, MI = 70.6 mg/kg, HI = 234 mg/kg, CT = 194 mg/kg). The analytical results indicate that total BaP concentrations in the coal tar sample are lower than in the highly impacted material, which may be a result of the higher water content of the coal tar sample.

Leachate tests were also performed on the untreated soil samples. The leachate tests included:

- Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP);

- Australian Standard Leaching Procedure (ASLP); and

- Multiple Extraction Procedure (MEP).

The four material types were subjected to a range of treatment regimes. The treated samples were then subject to leachate testing (TCLP, ASLP and MEP) as well as being assessed for unconfined compressive strength (UCS).

1.3.3 Discussion of Results

The general effect of treatment on contaminant leachate concentrations (compared to untreated soil leachate concentrations) and UCS are summarised following:

- Addition of Portland cement (PC) - leachate contaminant concentrations either showed no reduction or an increase. The UCS showed an increase to > 1 MPa with 5% PC (LI, MI) and with 10% PC (HI);

- Addition of 10% fly-ash - no significant effect on leachate concentrations was reported. An UCS of 3.1 MPa was achieved with the addition of 10% PC (the UCS was not determined on the fly-ash alone treatment); and

- Addition of the chemical fixative, RemBind-FO1 - a significant reduction in leachate contaminant concentrations was reported (5% RemBind-FO achieved an 80% reduction in ASLP concentrations and a 50% reduction in TCLP concentrations). The UCS of the RemBind-FO/PC blend was significantly lower than PC alone (HI material treated with 5% RemBind-FO 10% PC had a UCS of 0.4 MPa compared to a USC of 1.1 MPa for HI material treated with 10% PC alone).

The treatment trials indicated that the optimum pre-treatment with respect to leachate contaminant reduction would be the addition of 5% RemBind-FO. RemBind-FO treatment was only trialled on the HI material, however, a reduction in leachate concentrations would be expected similarly with the LI and MI material.

Conversely, the optimum pre-treatment for achieving the NSW EPA General Immobilisation Approval specification for UCS of greater than 1 MPa would be 5%PC for LI and MI materials and 10%PC for HI material.

1.3.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

Waste can be disposed of to a NSW EPA Licensed Landfill subject to classification of the material in accordance with the Waste Classification Guidelines (NSW EPA, 2014). Based on the SCC BaP criteria the material would be classified as Hazardous Waste, however, the NSW EPA General Immobilisation Approval # 2005/14 (IA) provides specific requirements for the stabilisation of coal tar contaminated soil for the purpose of disposal to an off-site NSW EPA licensed landfill facility.

The IA specifies that if the total concentrations are within specified criteria and a UCS of greater than 1 MPa is achieved, the treated soil can be assessed on TCLP leachability alone. Of the key contaminants of concern, the waste guidelines include a TCLP leachability criterion for BaP only. Based on the TCLP BaP concentrations (below the analytical detection limit for all material), the material (LI, MI, HI and CT) would be classified as General Solid Waste, providing the minimum UCS requirement is met. A UCS of greater than 1 MPa, could be achieved by the following treatments:

1 RemBind-FO is a proprietary product developed by Ziltek Pty Ltd for the chemical fixation and stabilisation of hazardous waste.

Page 5: Lend Lease Development Plans

Appendix D

P:\602X\60247139\4.RAP\14 ORWN RAP\4. Delivery\6.1 Reports\1 Draft\ORWN PD RAP\Draft 2\App D ex situ\Appendix D 9Sept2015.docx Revision – 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease – ABN: NA

3

- Material classified as LI and MI: 5% cement;

- Material classified as HI: 10% cement; and

- Material classified as CT: 40% - 80% fly-ash, 10% cement.

As described above, the TCLP BaP concentrations were all reported below the laboratory LOR. Therefore, these treatments would also be expected to achieve the required leachate criteria prescribed by the Waste Classification Guidelines (NSW EPA, 2014).

The final fly-ash percentage for the treatment of coal tar impacted material will depend on the consistency of the material and the amount of fly-ash required to achieve a spadeable consistency. EPS anticipated that the UCS requirement for CT would likely be met with a 40% -50% fly-ash treatment.

1.4 Treatment Operations – Ex-situ Stabilisation 1.4.1 Background

The contingency actions described by Section 20.7 include nomination of ex-situ stabilisation as the preferred remedial technologies for ex-situ treatment of material (including SPGWT / CIM) which requires treatment prior its offsite disposal (if required).

This section describes the methodologies to be employed for preparing and treating materials using ex situ stabilisation onsite (if required, refer to Section 1.2). Materials requiring treatment may also be treated at an offsite facility in accordance with applicable regulations and NSW EPA requirements.

1.4.2 Pre-Treatment of Materials

If onsite treatment works are conducted, pre-treatment works, if required, will be undertaken in two stages.

- Initially, the excavated material may be blended at the excavation face to make the material ‘spadeable’ (as detailed in Section 13.7.3); and

- Material requiring treatment will be transported to the RE, where further screening and testing of this material will take place.

The material will be stockpiled in the RE using a front end loader before undergoing secondary screening through a screen to achieve a grade of 40 mm minus. This is the minimum size requirement for material to feed into a pug mill. All screened overburden material will be set aside into type for potential crushing/recycling. The screening of the contaminated material will achieve a relatively homogenous feed material prior to being loaded into the feed hopper of the pug mill and minimise the quantity of material which requires treatment.

1.4.3 Remediation Enclosure and Emission Control System

As described by Section 1.2, ex-situ stabilisation equipment may be enclosed within a RE. The purpose of the RE is to control emissions during remediation treatment activities and ensure these emissions are vented to atmosphere through an ECS. Operation of the RE and associated ECS will be in accordance with operation and maintenance management systems developed on completion of the final design of the system. An overview of the controls to be designed into the system is provided below:

- The RE will be a clear span shed constructed of a steel frame with metal sheeting (or equivalent). The building will be sized to contain a screen and pugmill and have sufficient room for truck access, machinery and stockpiles. It will include doors, lights, electrical, adjustable louvers and other ancillary facilities that are required for safe and efficient operation.

- The building will contain approximately a 2-3 day working inventory of feed soil plus a sufficient buffer for soil curing and other pre-treatment activities. This inventory volume is designed to provide adequate storage capacity to feed the treatment plant during periods when unforeseen conditions interfere with normal excavation activities.

- ECS will consist of a ductwork system, induced draft fan, particulate control device, activated carbon adsorption system and stack. The ECS would be designed with sufficient capacity to provide a safe working environment within the RE.

Page 6: Lend Lease Development Plans

Appendix D

P:\602X\60247139\4.RAP\14 ORWN RAP\4. Delivery\6.1 Reports\1 Draft\ORWN PD RAP\Draft 2\App D ex situ\Appendix D 9Sept2015.docx Revision – 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease – ABN: NA

4

- The final design of the RE will be developed prior to the start of the remediation works. The structure is likely to include a negative pressure working enclosure with an air-lock doorway and an air extraction system for the control of odours and diesel exhaust.

- The air exhausted from the RE will first pass through a particulate control device (bag-house or pleated paper filter system) to remove fugitive dust. The particulate control system will include a system to remove particulates from the filter media. Dust removed will be collected in enclosed drums or hoppers.

- After the exhaust gas exits the particulate filter, it will pass through an activated carbon adsorption system. The activated carbon system will be equipped with a number of monitoring ports. A monitoring protocol will be developed for the various ports along the activated carbon adsorption system. This protocol will form the basis for deciding when activated carbon beds need to be replaced. Air would be exhausted to the atmosphere via a stack.

- Emissions from the ECS stack will be required to be licensed as part of the EPL for the Barangaroo site (refer to Section 12.1.1).

1.4.4 Pug Mill Treatment Plant

Ex situ stabilisation is intended to be accomplished by using a pugmill fed by a loader/excavator. The nature and quantity of agents used for stabilisation was the subject of a stabilisation trial.

The pugmill mixing chamber and computer controlled weight cells will allow the complete mixing of the additives with the soil matrix. A pugmill has been selected in recognition that the NSW EPA prefers aggressive mixing techniques (such as a pugmill) because they provide for complete mixing of the materials.

Analytical results will be used to demonstrate that the treated material is suitable for disposal to an appropriately licensed off-site landfill (in accordance with the Waste Classification Guidelines (NSW EPA, 2014).

Pug mill plants typically have a rated capacity of 600-1,000 tons per hour. This rate will vary depending on the physical properties of the soil, amount and type of additive, and the desired production rate.

The type of treatment plant will be based on the final design by the treatment contractor. Below is a description of the potential major components that may comprise a plant system.

Self-erecting Silo

The silo is filled pneumatically from bulk tankers. Additives such as cement, fly ash, lime and bentonite are blown into the silo.

The silo is equipped with a dust control system.

Material feed hopper

This hopper is fed with the soil(s) to be processed. It may be divided so as to accommodate two types of soil or aggregate. The hopper and may be fed one of three ways. First, a front-end loader can feed the hopper directly by building a ramp perpendicular to the hopper. Second, material may be conveyed into the hopper. Third, a screen can process directly into the hopper.

Twin shaft paddle pugmill

The pugmill is designed to achieve a violent mixing action throughout its length resulting in a well-mixed homogeneous product. This type of mixing, with no slump or low moisture products, is more effective than a drum type mixer that merely folds the product.

Hydrostatic cleated belt additive feeder

The additive is fed to the pugmill at the beginning of the mixing operation by means of the computer controlled cleated belt. Accuracies of better than plus/minus 2% of the design proportioning of the additive are achieved.

Page 7: Lend Lease Development Plans

Appendix D

P:\602X\60247139\4.RAP\14 ORWN RAP\4. Delivery\6.1 Reports\1 Draft\ORWN PD RAP\Draft 2\App D ex situ\Appendix D 9Sept2015.docx Revision – 09-Sep-2015 Prepared for – Lend Lease – ABN: NA

5

Water tank

The water requirement is determined by the mix design and the native water in the material to be mixed. Water is fed from an outside source into the plant’s onboard water tanks. This water is fed at the design rate into the mixing chamber by two hydraulic pumps which are computer controlled.

Discharge belt

The mixed product is discharged from the pugmill on this conveyor belt. The finished product is continuously and cumulatively weighted on a Ramsey belt scale.

Gob Hopper

The gob hopper is utilized to interrupt the continuous flow of mixed material allowing trucks to enter and exit the loading area. If trucks are used to transport the mixed material away from the plant, the direction of travel of the trucks should be with the driver’s side closest to the plant so that he/she may see the plant operator. The gob hopper maybe left open continuously so that a conveyor may be used to remove the finished product from the mixing plant.

Particulate Additive

Fine particulate additives such as cement, fly ash, lime and bentonite are pneumatically transferred from bulk tankers and stored in the self-erecting silo. If more than one type of additive is required, an optional self-erecting auxiliary silo may be set up next to the plant. The silos are equipped with negative pressure dust control systems, which filter and evacuate the pressurized air entering the silo. This process maintains constant silo pressure so as not to affect the consistency of the feeder.

Mixing Chamber

All ingredients enter simultaneously at the beginning of the mixing chamber allowing them maximum mixing time. The mixing chamber houses an interlaced twin shaft variable speed paddle pugmill designed to achieve a violent mixing action throughout its length resulting in a well-mixed homogeneous product. This type of mixing, with no slump or low moisture products, is greatly more effective and efficient than a drum type mixer that merely folds the product.

Control System

The Programmable Logic Controller and colour active matrix Operator Interface is directed by control software. Designed for harsh industrial environments, this versatile and reliable system has extensive self-diagnostics and is completely modular, making diagnosing and repairing problems as easy as plugging in a new module.

The software provides fully automated plant control and monitoring of all plant systems including engine, flow meters, sensors and switches. Displays indicate all flow rates, set points, feeder speeds, totals and status of all feeds and processes. All critical mechanical systems are monitored to alleviate damage and prevent down time. Inventory of fine particulate and admixture are computed and tracked.

1.4.5 Treated Soil

The RE will have a base capacity to stockpile between 2-3 days of treated soils from the pug mill. Treated materials stored in this area will undergo validation testing and classification to determine whether the treatment process has been effective. Materials that have not been treated to an acceptable level will be retreated.

Stockpiles would be then moved outside of the RE to a main stockpile area. Where required, stockpiles will be managed in accordance with the requirements of Section 13.7.7.

Page 8: Lend Lease Development Plans

19 of 22

Attachment 3: AECOM (2016b) Watermans Quay RAP

Addendum

Page 9: Lend Lease Development Plans

AECOM Australia Pty LtdLevel 21, 420 George StreetSydney NSW 2000PO Box Q410QVB Post Office NSW 1230Australiawww.aecom.com

+61 2 8934 0000 tel+61 2 8934 0001 faxABN 20 093 846 925

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx Ref: 60336060_LT07

Mark BurnsEnvironment Manager, Barangaroo SouthLend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Ltd30 The Bond, 30 Hickson Road, Millers Point

19 April 2016

Dear Mark

VMP/Block 4 Remedial Action Plan Addendum - Part Stage 1B Public Domain (Watermans Quay),Hickson Road, Millers Point, Barangaroo South

1.0 Introduction

This Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Addendum has been prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Limited (AECOM) forLend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease) in relation to that portion of the proposed Watermans Quaylocated between Stage 1A and the southern alignment of the proposed Stage 1B basement groundwaterretention wall. The proposed Watermans Quay has previously been referred to as ‘Globe Street’ (a term nolonger used). This area of land is variously referred to as the ‘Block 4 Services Zone’ and the Stage 1BBasement Stormwater Construction Area. It is noted that the southern portion of the proposed Watermans Quayis located above the Stage 1A basement.

For the purpose of this letter, the area between the Stage 1A and Stage 1B basements is referred to as ‘StudyArea’ – refer to the Figure 1 provided in Attachment 1 which is based on Figure F5 from the Remedial ActionPlan, NSW EPA Declared Remediation Site 21122 and Block 4 (Stage 1b) Development Works, Barangaroo,Millers Point, NSW (AECOM, 2013c) (here-in referred to as the VMP/Block 4 RAP). The area to which theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) applies is referred to as ‘the Site’.

1.1 Background

The Remediation and Landforming Works Development Application SSD 5897-2013 sought consent forremediation of Block 4 of Barangaroo South, including construction of retention wall systems and associatedstormwater diversion works. In particular, SSD 5897-2013 sought consent for the remediation works to becompleted in accordance with the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) subject to the following changes:

- The alignment and depth of the proposed Block 4 basement would be different to that described in theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c); and

- The Block 4 Remediation Works would be completed prior to remediation in Block 5 and Hickson Road(within the NSW EPA Declared Remediation Site 21122).

These changes were considered by the letter Remediation and Landforming Works Development Application(SSD 5897-2013), Adjustment in Block 4 Basement Area and Remediation Staging – Barangaroo, Hickson Road,Millers Point, NSW (AECOM, 2013c) (here-in referred to as the Block 4 Adjustment Letter) - refer toAttachment 2. The Block 4 Adjustment Letter (AECOM, 2013d) concluded (among other things), that:

- the proposed changes to the alignment and depth of the Block 4 basement could be suitably managed bythe contingency measures detailed in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c); and

- the proposed staging of the remediation works could be suitably managed by the existing provisions of theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c).

The proposed changes to the alignment and depth of the Block 4 basement that were described bySSD 5897-2013 included movement of the southern alignment of the Stage 1b basement groundwater retentionwall approximately 8 m north of the alignment anticipated by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) such that astrip of land will remain outside the basement groundwater retention wall systems between the Stage 1a andStage 1b basements. Under the scope of work proposed by SSD 5897-2013, the Study Area would beremediated to a standard suitable for the EPA Declaration to be revoked (that is to a standard suitable for thecurrent land use).

The Block 4 Adjustment Letter (AECOM, 2013d) noted that Section 23.12.4 and 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c) described contingency measures that should be undertaken if the Study Area is to be

Page 10: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx2 of 15

remediated to a standard suitable for a particular future land use. However, the Block 4 Adjustment Letter(AECOM, 2013c) concluded that because the Study Area was not proposed to be remediated to a standardsuitable for a future land use under SSD 5897-2013, this was not required as part of the development application.

Section 1.6 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) states that:

if the final development design is changed in a way which affects the assumptions of the DeclarationSite HHERA (AECOM, 2011) and Declaration Site HHERA Letter (AECOM, 2012b) and this RAP, anAddendum will be prepared, as required, and submitted to the NSW EPA Accredited Site Auditor forapproval.

It is understood that Lend Lease now requires that the Study Area between the Stage 1A and Stage 1Bbasements (including soil and groundwater that would remain outside the southern Stage 1B retention wall, referto Figure 1) be remediated for the proposed future land use. Hence, this Addendum has been prepared to:

- Implement of the contingency measures described by Section 23.12.4 and 12.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c); and

- Assess whether the Block 4 VMP Remediation Works recommended in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM,2013c) is also protective of the proposed future land use within the Study Area and the environment.

1.2 Proposed Remediation Works

The remediation works described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) include:

- the VMP Remediation Works - which are those works required such that the NSW EPA’s declaration of theDeclaration Area as a Remediation Site (Declaration Number 21122; Area Number 3221) can be revoked;and

- the Block 4 Development Remediation Works - which are those works required to remediate the Site(including the Study Area) to a standard suitable for the proposed development works (i.e. construction of abasement and overlying land uses [including commercial, retail, high density residential and public openspace]).

It is noted that the VMP Remediation Works (and the HHERA - VMP Remediation Works Area [Addressing theNSW EPA Remediation Site Declaration 21122 Millers Point] [AECOM, 2012c] on which it is based) are based onconsideration of the Chemicals of Potential Concern (CoPC) listed in the NSW EPA Declaration (DeclarationNumber 21122; Area Number 3221). These CoPC are:

- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs);

- benzene, toluene, ethylene and xylene (BTEX);

- total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH);

- ammonia;

- phenol and

- cyanide.

In contrast the Block 4 Development Remediation Works are based on the CoPC developed by the DeclarationSite HHERA (AECOM, 2011) in relation to the proposed future land use. The ’Additional CoPC’ considered by theDeclaration Site HHERA (AECOM, 2011), over and above those considered for development of the extent of theVMP Remediation Works are:

- Aniline;

- Dibenzofuran;

- 2-Methylnaphthalene;

- 3&4-Methylphenol;

- Phenol;

- Styrene;

- 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene; and

- Asbestos.

Page 11: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx3 of 15

It is noted that the VMP HHERA (AECOM, 2012c) did not consider asbestos as a CoPC because:

- from the perspective of the VMP Remediation Works, the CoPC assessed were limited to those definedwithin the NSW EPA Declaration (as agreed with the NSW EPA) (as above); and

- From the perspective of the Block 4 Development Remediation Works, it was assumed that all unsaturatedsoils would be removed from the Site as part of the development and as such, assessment of asbestos inthe unsaturated soils was not required.

2.0 Objectives

The objectives of this letter are to confirm whether the remediation works proposed at the Study Area as part ofSSD 5897-2013 (i.e. VMP Remediation Works):

- will achieve a standard suitable for the proposed future land use; and

- will also be suitably protective of the environment (i.e. groundwater within the Study Area’s fill material) inthe context of the future development use.

3.0 Scope of Works

To meet the objectives of this letter, the following scope of work was undertaken:

- Confirmation of the future land uses proposed at the Study Area and whether they are consistent with theland uses contemplated by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) in relation to the:

· VMP Remediation Works; and

· Block 4 Development Remediation Works.

- Review of any additional groundwater analytical data from monitoring undertaken by Lend Lease (i.e. inassociation with dewatering operations for the Stage 1a basement) that might be considered representativeof groundwater quality within the Study Area;

- Review of the available soil and groundwater analytical data, for contaminants of concern not contemplatedby the NSW EPA Declaration (as discussed in Section 2.0), within (or considered to be representative of)the Study Area and consideration of whether the reported concentrations are likely to represent:

· An unacceptable risk to the environment based on:

§ Comparison of relevant groundwater analytical results to the Marine Water Quality Criteria (asdefined by the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013c]);

§ Consideration of the results of leachate analysis (if available) and the potential for soilcontamination to impact groundwater;

§ Consideration of the distribution of reported soil contamination relative to marine sediment, thesaturated and unsaturated zones and the nearest sensitive receptor; and

§ Consideration of the potential for contaminant flux based on the Groundwater Discharge Study(AECOM, 2010), Contaminant Mass Flux Study (AECOM, 2012) and Additional GroundwaterMonitoring Study (AECOM, 2013a) as described by Section 6.6.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c).

· An unacceptable risk to human health based on:

§ Comparison of relevant soil and groundwater analysis results with the relevant Site SpecificTarget Criteria (SSTCs).

- A preliminary review of the available soil and groundwater results for the presence of Separate PhaseGasworks Waste and Tar (SPGWT) adjacent to the southern Stage 1B Perimeter Retention Wall (PRW);and

- Confirm whether the VMP Remediation Extent within the Study Area, as described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c), is considered to be protective of the proposed future land use and the environment.

Page 12: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx4 of 15

4.0 Overview of Proposed Development

The development works contemplated by SSD 6960 within the Study Area are summarised as follows (refer toFigure 1, Attachment 1):

- construction of services including excavation to a depth of less than approximately 2.7 m below groundlevel (bgl, as required for the provision of services from Stage 1A to the proposed Stage 1B basement andconstruction of a new stormwater pipe - see below); and

- future land uses within the Study Area including:

· public open space in the form of the Watermans Quay roadway built on grade; and

· a new stormwater pipe line constructed beneath the Watermans Quay roadway (running from HicksonRoad to Stage 1C (located west of Block 4), refer to Figure 1).

It is understood that:

- the southern Stage 1B PRW will have the same design and performance as the other Stage 1B PRWs andwill comply with the key assumptions detailed in Section 7.2.3 of theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c). As such, the Stage 1B PRW will effectively isolate soil andgroundwater contamination from north of the Study Area; and

- material used to backfill around the proposed stormwater pipe will comprise Suitable Fill (as defined inSection 5.13.3 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c]) compacted, as appropriate, to support the pipe.As such, construction of the stormwater pipe is not considered to represent a future preferential pathway forthe movement of groundwater through the Study Area.

5.0 VMP/Block 4 Remedial Action Plan

The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) was previously prepared to describe (among other things) remediationworks required to facilitate the proposed Block 4 Development Works which include the Stage 1B Basement (i.e.the Block 4 Development Remediation Works).

The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) also describes VMP Remediation Works required to facilitate removal ofthe current EPA Declaration from (among other areas) Block 4 (including the Study Area).

The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) was approved under delegation by the Minister of Planning as part ofDevelopment Application SSD 5897 (dated 10 November 2014).

5.1 Proposed Land Uses (Block 4 Development Area)

Section 4.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) describes the Block 4 development land uses asincorporating a mixture of commercial, retail and high density residential and public open space (incorporatingroads, community and related land uses) overlying the Block 4 basement. On this basis, construction of theproposed Watermans Quay roadway (built on grade) within the Study Area is not consistent with the proposedBlock 4 future land uses envisaged by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c).

Section 1.6 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) describes the land uses on which the VMP RemediationWorks are based as of limited use with the majority of the Area being vacant, paved open space area.Section 4.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) describes the land use scenarios adopted fordevelopment of the VMP Remediation Extent as paved recreation, unpaved recreation and intrusive maintenanceworker. On this basis, construction of the proposed Watermans Quay roadway (built on grade) within the StudyArea is consistent with the land uses on which the VMP Remediation Works envisaged by the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c) are based.

However, as noted by Section 1.2, the CoPC considered as the basis of the VMP Remediation Works does notinclude all CoPC considered applicable to the proposed future land uses. Therefore, an assessment of whetherthe reported soil and groundwater concentrations of the additional COPCs represent a risk to human health orthe environment is required.

5.2 Contingency Actions

Sections 23.12.4 and 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) describe contingency actions designedto assess the suitability of fill material and groundwater that would remain outside the southern Stage 1Bretention wall in the event that the alignment of the Block 4 basement is changed.

Page 13: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx5 of 15

As described by Section 1.1, the alignment of the southern Block 4 basement wall (as originally included in SSD5897-2013) was moved from that described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) . Section 7.0 of thisRAP Addendum implements the contingency measures referenced above and, in particular, considers whetherthe material that will remain outside the southern Stage 1B retention wall will present an unacceptable risk to thehuman health and the environment. In particular, the contingency measures outlined in Sections 23.12.5 of theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) have been implemented to assess whether:

- The proposed VMP Remediation Works proposed for the Study Area are appropriately protective of theenvironment; and

- Confirmed Impacted Material (CIM) is present within the Study Area which would warrant remediation.

6.0 Remediation Goals

The following sections summarise development of the SSTC for soil and groundwater which are specific to:

- the proposed land uses at the Study Area as detailed in Section 4.0; and

- the Additional CoPC detailed in Section 1.2.

6.1 Land Use Scenarios Applicable to the Study Area

The land uses which are considered to be relevant to the proposed landuses at the Study Area (as described inSection 4.0) are:

- Scenario 3 - unpaved public domain / open space;

- Scenario 4 - paved public domain / open space; and

- Scenario 6 - short term ground-intrusive maintenance.

6.2 Derivation of SSTCs for the Study Area

The soil analytical results (unsaturated and saturated) at the Study Area and in adjacent areas are presented inTable T1, Attachment 3. As required by the Declaration Site HHERA (AECOM, 2011), the unsaturated soilresults have been compared to a hybrid criteria based on adoption of the lowest of the SSTC for the threeapplicable land use Scenarios as described in Section 6.1. That is, where more than one SSTC is applicable,the lowest SSTC has been adopted to derive the hybrid criteria for the Study Area.

The same approach has also been undertaken for the derivation of appropriate hybrid groundwater criteria basedon adoption of the lowest of the SSTC for the three applicable land use Scenarios (refer to Table T2,Attachment 3.

Asbestos SSTCs which were derived in the ORWS Asbestos HHERA (AECOM, 2013d) will also be implementedfor the unsaturated soils in the Study Area. Asbestos reported to be present in soils within the ORWS Areacomprised predominately bonded Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) and the potential for asbestos fibre (AF)generation was considered to be minimal. It has been assumed that asbestos which may be present within theStudy Area is likely to be similar – that is predominantly bonded ACM.

The asbestos SSTCs are summarised by Table 1 below. The asbestos SSTCs are to be applied in addition toother applicable SSTCs (as discussed above).Table 1 Summary of Asbestos SSTC

Exposure Scenario Asbestos Site Specific Target Criteria

Intrusive Maintenance Worker 2 0.05 % w/w 1

Suitable Fill 3 No Visible AsbestosNotes:

1) To be measured in accordance with the methodology described by Schedule B2 of the NEPM (NEPC, 2013);2) The intrusive maintenance worker exposure scenario is applicable to soil in areas used for paved or unpaved public

domain / open space at depths:a) below the 0.5 m thick Suitable Fill;b) up to approximately 3.0 m below the final development level (which is understood will be at least 1 m above

the current ground surface); andc) above the groundwater table.

3) ‘Suitable Fill’ of 0.5 metres will be placed in open space areas. All Suitable Fill will be imported to the Study Areaand is defined as:a) virgin excavated natural material (VENM);

Page 14: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx6 of 15

b) soil which contains contaminant concentrations below the Terrestrial Soil Criteria (developed for themaintenance of plant health and human health); and

c) Soil which is visually free of bonded ACM.

6.3 Marine Water Quality Criteria (MWQC)

As discussed in Section 7.1.3 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c), the Marine Water Quality Criteria(MWQC) have been adopted at the down hydraulic gradient Declaration Area boundary as suitable screeningcriteria that are protective of the environment including: groundwater dependant ecosystems which may bepresent down-hydraulic gradient of the Declaration Area boundary currently or in the future; and, ultimatelyDarling Harbour. Consequently, the Remediation Goals detailed in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c)included removal / remediation of soil, to the extent practicable such that groundwater quality within fill materialleaving the Declaration Area (measured at the down hydraulic gradient Declaration Area boundary) approachesthe MWQC.

7.0 Review of Available Contamination Data

7.1 Distribution of Separate Phase Gasworks Waste and Tar (SPGWT)

No SPGWT has been identified to be present in the fill material within the Study Area. As such, and based onconsideration of contaminant mass flux (as discussed in Section 6.6.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM,2013c]), SPGWT is not considered to represent an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment at theStudy Area.

As detailed in the Table 8 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c), SPGWT was identified to be present withinthe underlying natural marine sediments at sampling location BH408 (located adjacent to the Study Area to thenorth) at a depth ranging between 8.0 and 9.4 metres below ground level (bedrock was encountered at thislocation at a depth of 9.4 m bgl). These impacts appear to be localised as they were not identified atneighbouring borehole locations BH114 and BH409 (refer to Figure 1).

Based on the presence of SPGWT in the BH408 area at relatively shallow depths, the SPGWT impacts in theBH408 area were included within the ‘VMP Remediation Extent’ (refer to Section 8.5.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP[AECOM, 2013c]) and will be remediated as part of the VMP Remediation Works.

As per Section 7.2.3 of VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c), it is assumed that tar will be removed from theimmediate vicinity of outer basement walls to the extent practicable. An assessment of whether SPGWT ispresent adjacent to the eastern, northern and western Stage 1B PRWs is included in Section 9.2.2.3 of theVMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c). The alignment of these three sections of the Stage 1B PRW remainunchanged from the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c). A preliminary review of the soil and groundwateranalytical data adjacent to the southern Stage 1B retention wall has been undertaken as follows. The samplingdensity across the Study Area is considered adequate for preliminary review purposes although some data gapsof up to 30 m are present in the western area.

- Sampling location BH36 - a tarry odour was also noted in natural marine sediments at a depth of14.5-15 m bgl (Relative Level -12.25-12.75 m Australian Height Datum) at sampling location BH36 (bedrockwas present at 15 m bgl). This observation may be indicative of SPGWT. No odours were observed in thefill material overlying the natural marine sediments. While this impact (if present) would be at a depth belowthe proposed VMP Remediation Works (remediation to 10 m bgl), it would coincide with the approximatedepth of the base of the proposed Stage 1B basement excavation (RL -13.65 m AHD or approximately 16 mbgl). However, it is noted that this excavation level includes the lower basement slab thickness, with the topof the lower basement slab being RL-11.2 m AHD. Accordingly, the potential SPGWT at BH36 appears tobe deeper than the slab level of the lowermost basement floor (approximately 2.5 m thick including the mainslab, drainage layers and wearing course), and so is potentially not adjacent to the outer southern Stage 1Bretention wall; and

- Sampling location BH408 - as described above, the SPGWT identified at this location would beappropriately removed as part of the as part of the VMP Remediation Works and would not present anunacceptable risk to the Stage 1B basement occupants.

It is recommended that, in the absence of any additional data, that the presence or absence of SPGWT in thevicinity of the southern Stage 1B PRW in the western portion (i.e. west of the VMP Remediation Extent) beverified by additional assessment undertaken as part of future validation works by the Stage 1B validationconsultant. This further assessment would include relevant information obtained during construction of thesouthern Stage 1B retention wall.

Page 15: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx7 of 15

7.2 Soil Analytical Results

7.2.1 Protection of Human Health (Soil)

The unsaturated and saturated soil results from the Study Area have been compared to the risk basedremediation (SSTC) criteria developed for the Study Area (refer to Table T1, Attachment 3) for CoPC other thanasbestos. There is considered to be a sufficient soil analytical data to appropriately characterise (both laterallyand vertically) CoPC concentrations within the Study Area’s fill material.

The soil analytical results indicate that all CoPC concentrations are significantly less than the SSTC. In particularall Additional CoPC concentrations were reported to be less than the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) with theexception with one phenol result (0.01 mg/kg) in sample BH409_3.7-4.0. Consequently, the soils at the StudyArea are considered to be suitably protective of human health for future users of the Study Area (based on theproposed future land uses described in Section 4.0).

7.2.2 Protection of Human Health (Asbestos in Soil)

Based on review of the available analytical data within the Study Area, it is considered that there is insufficientdata to characterise the presence (or absence) of asbestos in unsaturated soils. Therefore, it is recommendedthat validation testing be conducted to assess the presence (or absence) of asbestos within the unsaturated soilsat the Study Area (in that portion which won’t be excavated by the stormwater construction works) and tofacilitate comparison against the asbestos SSTCs for the purpose of assessing risk to human health. Refer toSection 8.0 for further details.

7.2.3 Protection of the Environment (Soil)

Table 2 presents a summary of the Additional CoPC concentrations reported in fill materials (which may remainas an ongoing source of contamination to groundwater quality at the western edge of the Study Area). Table 2includes analytical data for:

- fill materials only (based on negligible flux from the underlying natural marine sediments, refer to Section6.6.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c); and

- the Additional COPCs as discussed in Section 1.2 (with the exception of asbestos that does not representa risk to the environment).

Table 2 Soil Analytical Results - Summary of the Additional COPCs in the Study Area’s Fill Materials

CoPC(mg/kg)

Number Concentration Mean (StandardDeviation)Results Detections Min Max

Aniline 1 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

Dibenzofuran 1 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

Phenol 8 1 <0.01 0.01 0.19 (0.11)

2-methylnapthalene 4 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

3&4-methylphenol 6 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 1 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

Styrene 1 0 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 (0)

Based on the mean concentrations summarised in Table 2 it is considered that fill materials within the Study Areahave not been significantly impacted by the Additional CoPC and are considered unlikely to impact groundwaterquality at the down-hydraulic boundary.

7.3 Groundwater Analytical Results

The groundwater analytical data assessed herein is based on that presented in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM,2013c). Whilst more recent groundwater analytical data was generated in association with dewatering for theStage 1A basement construction, this additional data was not considered to be of suitable quality to allow specificassessment of groundwater conditions within the Study Area. As such, it is not assessed further herein.

Page 16: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx8 of 15

7.3.1 Protection of Human Health (Groundwater)

The groundwater results considered representative of the Study Area have been compared to the groundwaterSSTC in Table T2, Attachment 3 (refer to Section 6.2). This included the groundwater results from monitoringwell locations MW22, MW45 and MW209. The well construction details for these wells are provided in Table T2,Attachment 3. The results indicate that all CoPC were reported a concentrations significantly less than thegroundwater criteria and typically less than the laboratory Limit of Reporting.

It is further noted that groundwater concentrations from groundwater monitoring wells across the DeclarationArea (as detailed in Table T10 and T11 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013c]) were also generally less thanthe groundwater SSTC. The only exception to this is those groundwater monitoring wells that were installedwithin the areas of historic gasworks infrastructure (where SPGWT is known to be present).

The groundwater results in Table T2 indicate that all reported contaminant concentrations for the AdditionalCoPC are reported to be significantly less than the groundwater SSTC.

7.3.2 Protection of the Environment (Groundwater)

The groundwater results in Table T2 indicate that all reported contaminant concentrations for the AdditionalCoPC are reported to be less than the laboratory LOR and less than the corresponding MWQC criteria. The onlyexception to this is at MW209, which was screened within both the fill materials and the natural marinesediments/bedrock and therefore is not considered representative of groundwater quality within the fill material..

7.4 Contaminant Mass Distribution

Based on the available borehole data obtained from the previous site investigations, the volume of fill materialpresent within the Study Area, and which will remain in situ at completion of the VMP Remediation Works, isestimated to be in the order of 6,200 m3. In the context of the contaminant mass calculations detailed inSection 6.4 of the VMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b), the volume of fill (and contaminant mass) atthe Study Area, which could represent a potential ongoing source of impact to the environment, is relatively minorwhen compared to the volume of fill (and contaminant mass) which was estimated to be present between theDeclaration Area and Darling Harbour (i.e. will remain in place following completion of the VMP RemediationWorks).

The estimated volume of fill that will remain in-situ outside the Declaration Area following completion of the VMPRemediation Works (referred to by Section 6.4.2 of the VMP Remediation Extent report [AECOM, 2013b] asZone 3 and 41) was estimated to be in the order of 423,000 m3. As such, the additional volume of fill materialwhich will remain in situ outside the Stage 1B PRW represents an approximate increase of 1.5% of the fillmaterial located to the west of the Declaration Area.

The contaminant mass for key COPCs2 naphthalene and TPH C10-C14 estimated to be present in the StudyArea’s fill material is compared to the contaminant mass estimated to remain in the Zone 3 and 4 fill materials inTable T3, Attachment 3. The calculations have been undertaken using the same approach as adopted in theVMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b) and indicate that:

- The estimated contaminant mass of naphthalene present in the Study Area’s fill material (which wouldremain in situ outside the Stage 1B PRW) represents an approximate 0.07% increase of the naphthalenecontaminant mass in the Zone 3 and 4 fill materials; and

- The estimated contaminant mass of TPH C10-C14 present in the Study Area’s fill material (which wouldremain in situ outside the Stage 1B PRW) represents an approximate 0.3% increase of the TPH C10-C14

contaminant mass in the Zone 3 and 4 fill materials.

The above calculations indicate that the increase in contaminant mass within the Study Area fill material that willresult from the changed Stage 1B basement alignment is negligible in the context of the contaminant masspresent in the Zone 3 and 4. Consequently, remediation of the Study Area, over and above that already requiredas part of the VMP Remediation Work would provide a negligible increased protection to the environment.

The VMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b) demonstrated that if the remediation works described bythe VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013b) are completed, the residual gasworks related contamination that will

1 Zone 2 (the area within the Declaration Area that is outside the VMP Remediation Extent) has been conservatively excludedfrom the calculations on the basis that it will be contained within the Stage 1B basement and therefore not accessible to theenvironment.2 The VMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b) concluded that naphthalene and TPH C10-C14 were the key CoPCs atthe Site as they were estimated to have the largest volume of contaminant mass at the Site and the groundwater resultsindicated that naphthalene and TPH C10-C14 concentrations generally exceed the Marine Water Quality Criteria by the largestorder of magnitude across the Site.

Page 17: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx9 of 15

remain in situ down-hydraulic gradient of the Declaration Area (i.e. the Zone 3 and 4 fill materials discussedabove) will not represent an unacceptable risk to the environment.

Consequently, given the relatively small volume of fill material and contaminant mass present at the Study Areaand located outside the Stage 1B PRW, the Study Area is unlikely to have a significant future impact ongroundwater quality migrating from the Declaration Area and ultimately discharging to Darling Harbour (followingcompletion of the VMP Remediation Works).

7.5 Change to the Groundwater Flow Regime

Based on the available historical investigation data for the Study Area (as provided in various reports by AECOM,ERM and others), the movement of groundwater within the Study Area, between the Stage 1A and Stage 1Bbasements, is not considered to present a significant contamination risk to the proposed future land use anddown-hydraulic gradient areas because:

- The area located to the east of the Study Area (within Hickson Road) is not within the VMP RemediationExtent and the groundwater in this area does not require remediation.

- Bedrock east of the Study Area is known to be very shallow (approximately 0.6 m bgl at TBH09, refer toFigure 1). Therefore, groundwater flow at the eastern end of the Study Area (i.e. adjacent to the TBH09area) is likely to be low and restricted to relatively minor flows through the relatively impermeable sandstonebedrock and is not likely to produce significant groundwater flows through the Study Area (i.e. groundwaterflows from east to west);

- The area of the Study Area is relatively small (approximately 920 m2 compared to a total area of 21,000 m2

Declaration Area) and therefore the potential contaminant mass flux through this area would be small; and

- Terrestrial groundwater flow across the Study Area from the east will be low as a result of the up gradienturban catchment for groundwater recharge (i.e. comprising generally impermeable hard stand urban areas)and the underlying sandstone bedrock. In particular, the majority of rainfall becomes surface water runoffdue to the presence of pavements and buildings, leaving little water to infiltrate and recharge thegroundwater system at the Study Area.

It is anticipated that the Additional CoPC concentrations will continue to decrease over time once the VMPRemediation Works are completed and Stage 1B Basement is constructed (as required for completion of theBlock 4 Development Works). As illustrated by the contaminant flux modelling (AECOM, 2013a), undertaken insupport of the VMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b]), the reduction in contaminant mass that isexpected to occur as a result of the proposed VMP Remediation Works will result in a significant improvement togroundwater quality in the fill material (between 250% and 380%).

8.0 Validation Works

8.1 Southern Stage 1B PRW Alignment

To further assess the potential SPGWT impacts in the BH36 area (as discussed in Section 7.1), future validationinvestigations are recommended in the western portion of the Stage 1B PRW as it will not be possible to visuallyassess the presence/absence of SPGWT in the materials behind the Stage 1B PRW following construction. IfSPGWT is confirmed to be present during these works, the following Contingency measures of the VMP/Block 4RAP (AECOM, 2013b) will be implemented as required:

- Section 23.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013b) - if SPGWT is identified outside and/or below theproposed VMP Remediation Works, an assessment of whether the SPGWT represents an unacceptablerisk and can be practicably remediation will be undertaken; and

- Section 23.11 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013b) - if SPGWT is identified to be present in thebedrock various engineering mitigation measures will be considered.

8.2 Asbestos in Unsaturated Soils

As described by Section 7.2.2, additional validation sampling of the unsaturated soils that will remain within theStudy Area following development is required to characterise the presence (or absence of asbestos) and confirmthat any asbestos present does not represent an unacceptable risk to human health.

The additional validation sampling of unsaturated soils will involve:

Page 18: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx10 of 15

- Collection of validation soil samples at a sampling density of one sample location per 20 m grid interval:

- Soil samples will be collected from test pits to allow the collection of bulk samples as required for analysis ofthe gravimetric content of bonded ACM;

- Soil samples will collected from within the unsaturated zone at depths of approximately 0.5 and 1.5 m bgl;

- Soil samples will be biased toward those zones considered most likely to be impacted based on fieldobservations (including visual/olfactory observations and PID readings); and

- All soil samples will be analysed for asbestos based on measurement of the gravimetric content of bondedACM in soil as described by Schedule B1 of the NEPM (NEPC, 2013), to allow appropriate comparison tothe asbestos SSTCs (refer to Section 6.2).

Based on the results of the additional validation sampling, an assessment of whether CIM is present within theunsaturated soils within the Study Area will be undertaken based on comparison of the reported concentrationsagainst the asbestos SSTC. These works will be undertaken in consultation with the NSW EPA Accredited SiteAuditor and will be detailed in a Progressive Validation Report to be issued to the NSW EPA Accredited SiteAuditor.

If CIM is identified by the additional validation sampling based on the presence of asbestos at concentrationsgreater than the asbestos SSTC, additional delineation works may be required to appropriately characterise thevertical and horizontal extent of the impacts and to define remediation requirements. If required, thesedelineation and remediation works would be conducted in consultation with the NSW EPA Accredited SiteAuditor.

The above validation works will be further detailed in a Validation SAQP to be prepared in accordance withSection 19.2.3 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c).

9.0 Conclusions

In conclusion, AECOM considers that:

- Soil and groundwater data from within and in the vicinity of the Study Area is adequate for assessment ofwhether the fill materials and groundwater are suitable for the proposed future land use and are adequatelyprotective of the environment. The only exceptions to this are:

· Future validation data is required to confirm the absence of SPGWT adjacent to the new alignment ofthe southern Stage 1B basement wall in the western portion (i.e. west of the VMP RemediationExtent). Additional validation (as discussed in Section 8.0) is recommended to address this data gap;and

· Insufficient asbestos in soils analytical data in unsaturated soil within the Study Area. Additionalvalidation testing (as discussed in Section 8.0) is recommended to address this data gap.

The scope of work required for these additional validation works will be detailed in a Validation SAQP to beprepared in accordance with Section 19.2.3 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c).

- The land uses considered for the VMP Remediation Works are consistent with the proposed land useswithin the Study Area and therefore, the Study Area is considered protective of human health and theenvironment for those CoPC assessed by the VMP HHERA (AECOM, 2012c) (refer to Section 1.2);

- Further assessment of whether the concentrations of the Additional CoPC assessed by the Declaration SiteHHERA (AECOM, 2011) are similarly protective of human health and the environment has been undertakenas part of this Addendum in accordance with the contingency measures described by Sections 23.12.4 and23.12.5 of the VMP HHERA (AECOM, 2012c) and VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013b);

- Protection of human health:

· Comparison of the Additional CoPC soil and groundwater analytical results considered representativeof the Study Area to the soil and groundwater SSTCs relevant to the proposed future land uses,indicates that all Additional CoPC concentrations are less than the relevant SSTCs.

· Therefore, pending the results of the future validation sampling (refer to Section 8.0), soil andgroundwater concentrations at the Study Area are not considered to pose an unacceptable risk tohuman health in the context of the proposed future land uses.

Page 19: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx11 of 15

- Protection of the environment - the fill material and groundwater that will remain within the Study Areaafter completion of the VMP Remediation Works (as described in Section 7.0) are considered to beprotective of the environment based on the following:

· SPGWT has not been identified to be present in the Study Area fill material;

· The concentrations of Additional COPCs reported in the Study Area fill material are less than the soilSSTC and are not considered to be representative of an ongoing source of groundwater contaminationwhich would present a significant ongoing risk to the environment;

· The concentrations of Additional COPCs reported in groundwater within the Declaration Area weregenerally either less than the laboratory LOR or less than the corresponding MWQC criteria;

· It is anticipated that the Additional CoPC concentrations will continue to decrease over time once theVMP Remediation Works are completed and Stage 1B Basement is constructed. Contaminant fluxmodelling (AECOM, 2013a) previously undertaken, demonstrated that the reduction in contaminantmass that is expected to occur as a result of the proposed VMP Remediation Works will result in asignificant improvement to groundwater quality in the fill material (between 250% and 380%);

· The volume and contaminant mass of key COPCs (naphthalene and TPH C10-C14) that is estimated toremain within the Study Area fill material relative to that which will otherwise remain followingcompletion of the VMP Remediation Works (i.e. within Zone 3 and 4 fill materials as defined by theVMP Remediation Extent report [AECOM, 2013b]) is very small and unlikely to impact on theenvironment;

· Based on the available historical investigation data for the Study Area, the movement of groundwaterand associated contaminant flux within the Study Area is small and will not present a significantcontamination risk to the proposed future land use and the environment in down-hydraulic gradientareas; and

· The proposed development works at the Study Area will involve the partial excavation of the StudyArea’s fill materials to a depth of 2.7 m bgl and backfilling around the stormwater pipe with Suitable Fillvalidated in accordance with the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013b). The use of Suitable Fill at theStudy Area will further reduce the contaminant mass at the Study Area which will ultimately improvegroundwater quality ultimately migrating to the west (across the down-gradient hydraulic DeclarationArea boundary).

Based on the above information, it is concluded that:

- Validation sampling is required to:

· Confirm the absence (or otherwise) of SPGWT adjacent to the new alignment of the southern Stage1B PRW; and

· Characterise asbestos concentrations within unsaturated soil in the Study Area and facilitate anassessment of resultant risk to human health.

- Subject to the outcome of the above validation sampling, completion of the proposed VMP RemediationWorks within the Study Area (as detailed in Section 6.8.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013c]) willrender the Study Area:

· suitable for the proposed future land uses within the Study Area as described by SSD 6690(specifically paved recreation landuse as a publically accessible roadway); and

· protective of the environment.

- The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013c) is appropriate to manage the VMP Remediation Works includingremediation of the Study Area and does not require amendment;

- The contingency measures detailed in Sections 23.12.4 and 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP(AECOM, 2013c) have been appropriately implemented via the preparation of this RAP Addendum; and

- Subject to the outcome of the above validation sampling, additional remediation of the Study Area (i.e. inaddition to the VMP Remediation Works) is not required for the proposed development land uses describedin Section 4.0.

Page 20: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx12 of 15

10.0 References

AECOM, 2010. Groundwater Discharge Study, Stage 1 Barangaroo Development. 3 November 2010.

AECOM, 2011. HHERA, Declaration Site (Development Works) Remediation Works Area - Barangaroo. 9 June.

AECOM, 2012a. Contaminant Flux and Discharge estimations for natural residual soil and marine sediments,EPA Declaration Area 21122 and adjacent areas of Barangaroo South and Barangaroo Central. 14 March.

AECOM, 2012b. HHERA - Declaration Site, Barangaroo. Assessment of the Implications of the RevisedBasement Design. 3 July.

AECOM, 2012c. HHERA – VMP Remediation Works Area (Addressing the NSW EPA Remediation SiteDeclaration 21122 Millers Point). 25 October.

AECOM, 2013a. Additional Groundwater Modelling to Supplement Contaminant Flux and Discharge Estimatesfor Natural Soils and Marine Sediments for EPA Declaration Area 21122. 12 March 2012.

AECOM, 2013b. VMP Remediation Extent, VMP Remediation Works Area, (Parts of Barangaroo and HicksonRoad), Millers Point, NSW. 23 July 2013.

AECOM, 2013c. Remedial Action Plan, NSW EPA Declared Remediation Site 21122 and Block 4 (Stage 1b)Development Works, Barangaroo, Millers Point, NSW. 24 July.

AECOM, 2013d. Remediation and Landforming Works Development Application (SSD 5897-2013), Adjustmentin Block 4 Basement Area and Remediation Staging – Barangaroo, Hickson Road, Millers Point, NSW. 10September.

AECOM, 2013d. Addendum to Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment. Other Remediation Works(South) Area, Barangaroo. 16 October.

AECOM, 2015. Draft RAP, Barangaroo South Stage 1B Waterfront Public Domain. 23 July.

Yours faithfully,

Andrew Rolfe Michael JonesPrincipal Scientist Technical Director - [email protected] [email protected]

Mobile: +61 418 601 363 Mobile: +61 428 532 255Direct Dial: +61 2 8295 1149 Direct Dial: +61 2 8934 0397

Attachment 1: Site Plan

Attachment 2: Block 4 Adjustment Letter (AECOM, 2013d)

Attachment 3: Summary Tables:

Table T1 - Applicable ORWN Services Zone and Block 4 Services Zone Soil Analytical Results

Table T2 - Applicable ORWN Interim Public Domain Soil Analytical Results

Table T3 - Comparison of Study Area contaminant mass to Zone 3 & 4 (Fill Material only)

Page 21: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx13 of 15

Attachment 1: Site Plan

Page 22: Lend Lease Development Plans

3.00

3.00

CONC.

CONC.

ME

T AL

RO

OF

ME

T AL

RO

OF

3

HICKSON ROAD

BARANGAROOCENTRAL

(PART)

BLOCK 4

BLOCK 5

ORWN AREA

ORWS RAP AREA

VMP / BLOCK 4 RAP, BARANGAROO

EXTENT OF LEND LEASE

STAGE 1B BASEMENT

VMP / BLOCK 4 RAP (AECOM,

2013) BOUNDARY - RED DASHED

LINE

STAGE 1B SEPP 55 LETTER, BARANGAROO

FIGURE 1

Figure 1

APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF VMP REMEDIATION

WORKS

'THE STUDY AREA' -

Watermans Quay

MONITORING WELL DISCUSSED IN LETTER TEXT

Page 23: Lend Lease Development Plans

Datum 0.0

SSL 0.000Basement B1

SSL -2.300Basement B2

SSL -5.300Basement B3

SSL -8.250Basement B4

SSL -11.200

Basement B0

SSL 0.500

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300GROUND FLOORRL 3.500

CONCRETE SLAB AS BASE FORLANDSCAPE AREARL 2.200

SET DOWN FOR PROPOSEDROAD SERVICES ANDINFRASTRUCTURE ZONE

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

SERVICES ZONE REFER TOCIVIL ENGINEERINGCONSULTANTS

BARA

NGAR

OO S

OUTH

SIT

E BO

UNDA

RY

INDICATIVEROCK LEVEL

EXTENT OF EXISTING KERB LINE

SSL -16.000

REFER PROJECTAPPLICATION MP10_0023

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Graham Jones16.07.2015Approved:Stephanie Smith16.07.2015

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

16 July 2015 A_PA2_A300STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

SECTION 01

Page 24: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx14 of 15

Attachment 2: Block 4 Adjustment Letter (AECOM,2013d)

Page 25: Lend Lease Development Plans

AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 21, 420 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box Q410 QVB Post Office NSW 1230 Australia www.aecom.com

+61 2 8934 0000 tel +61 2 8934 0001 fax ABN 20 093 846 925

10 September 2013

Mark Burns Environment Manager Barangaroo South | Lend Lease 30 The Bond, 30 Hickson Road, Millers Point, NSW

Dear Mark

Remediation and Landforming Works Development Application (SSD 5897-2013), Adjustment in Block 4 Basement Area and Remediation Staging - Barangaroo, Hickson Road, Millers Point, NSW

1.0 Introduction

This letter has been prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Limited (AECOM) for Lend Lease (Millers Point) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease) to support the Remediation and Landforming Works Development Application (DA SSD 5897-2013) prepared by Lend Lease. SSD 5897-2013 seeks consent for remediation of Block 4 of Barangaroo South and some associated stormwater diversion works.

The remediation of Block 4 will be undertaken in accordance with the Remedial Action Plan, NSW EPA Declared Remediation Site 21122 and Block 4 (Stage 1b) Development Works, Barangaroo, Millers Point, NSW (RAP, AECOM, 2013) (here-in referred to as the VMP/Block 4 RAP). With respect to the VMP Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2103), it is noted that:

- the alignment and depth of the proposed Block 4 basement area described by DA SSD 5897-2013 has been adjusted from that described in the VMP Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2103). These adjustments are described in Section 2.0; and

- the Block 4 Remediation Works are proposed to be undertaken prior to the remediation work in Block 5 and Hickson Road (within the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority [NSW EPA] Declared Remediation Site 21122 [here-in referred to as the EPA Declaration Area]). The proposed staging of remediation works is described in Section 3.0.

The objective of this letter is therefore to confirm that:

- the proposed adjustments to the Block 4 basement area (i.e. the basement groundwater retention wall system and the basement excavation depth) as described by DA SSD 5897-2013 can be suitably managed by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013).

- staged remediation of Block 4 followed by Block 5 and Hickson Rd (within the EPA Declaration Area):

is consistent with the approved VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) and can be suitably managed by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013);

will not adversely affect groundwater migration from the area up hydraulic gradient of Block 4 (including within Hickson Road).

- amendment of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) is not required to facilitate the proposed adjustments to the Block 4 basement area and the proposed staging of remediation works in Block 4, Block 5 and Hickson Road.

With respect to the remediation works described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013), DA SSD 5897-2013 will seek consent for:

- Remediation of Block 4 such that the NSW EPA Declaration can be revoked (also referred to by the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013] as the ‘VMP Remediation Works’); and

- Remediation of the area of the proposed Block 4 basement (i.e. within the retention wall system proposed by DA SSD 5897-2013) to a standard that is suitable for the proposed development (also referred to by the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013] as the ‘Block 4 Development Remediation Works’).

Page 26: Lend Lease Development Plans

2 of 6

2.0 Proposed Block 4 Basement Adjustments

The proposed adjustments to the Block 4 basement design (relative to the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013]), as detailed in the Lend Lease development plans DA SSD 5897-2013 (refer to Attachment 1), are:

- the southern Block 4 retention wall system will be constructed approximately 13 m to the north of the location noted in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013). The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) envisaged that the wall would be constructed adjacent to the adjacent Stage 1a basement groundwater retention wall; and

- excavation for the Block 4 basement will extend to a depth of approximately 18 m below ground level (bgl) or Relative Level (RL) -15.6 m Australian Height Datum (AHD). The VMP/Block 4 RAP envisaged that the typical depth of the Block 4 basement would be approximately 8 m bgl (RL -5.6 m AHD).

Figure 1 (attached to this letter) shows:

- the adjusted alignment of the southern Block 4 perimeter retention wall;

- the adjusted basement excavation depth; and

- the proposed extent of remediation within saturated soils required to facilitate revoking of the NSW EPA Declaration (as presented in the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013]) (the VMP Remediation Extent).

The remediation works contemplated by DA SSD 5897-2013 are:

- Block 4 Development Remediation Works to be undertaken in accordance with the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) within the adjusted footprint of the Block 4 basement (as shown on Figure 1); and

- VMP Remediation Works to be undertaken in accordance with the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) within Block 4.

3.0 Proposed Staging of Remediation Works

It is proposed that the remediation works to be undertaken within Block 4 as described by DA SSD 5897-2013 will be undertaken prior to the remediation work in Block 5 and Hickson Road (within the EPA Declaration Area).

Separate Development Applications will be prepared with respect to:

- Remediation for potential future land uses (if required), of the area Block 4 to the south of the adjusted footprint of the Block 4 basement; and

- Remediation of those parts of Block 5 and Hickson Road that are within the EPA Declaration Area.

4.0 VMP/Block 4 RAP

4.1 Contingency Measures Applicable to Basement Design Changes

The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) acknowledges that, at the time of writing, the Block 4 basement and retention wall system were subject to ongoing refinement and development as part of the Lend Lease design process. In recognition of this, the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) includes contingency measures/responses which should be implemented in the event that the Block 4 basement design is modified from the assumptions in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013). In particular, the following sections of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) are relevant to the design adjustments described by Section 2.0:

- Section 23.12.1 contemplates a potential increase in basement excavation depth (refer to Section 4.1.1); and

- Section 23.12.5 contemplates changes to the lateral alignment of the southern Block 4 basement groundwater retention wall system which may result in material remaining within Block 4 but outside the retention wall system (refer to Section 4.1.2).

The following sections implement the contingency measures/responses required by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013), as described above, based on the basement design adjustments described by Section 2.0. Reference is also made to Sections 19.5.3 and 19.5.4 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) which describe the soil validation requirements associated with the Block 4 Development Works.

Page 27: Lend Lease Development Plans

3 of 6

4.1.1 Increase in Basement Depth

Section 23.12.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) states that increasing the depth of the Block 4 basement will not affect the extent of remediation required or the preferred remediation strategy.

It is noted that, based on available borehole and analytical data in Block 4, the adjusted (increased) basement excavation depth will require excavation of the majority of fill material and natural marine sediments and will likely extend into bedrock. Separate Phase Gasworks Waste and Tar (SPGWT1) has been identified to be present at depth in the western portion of Block 4 below the depth of the previously proposed basement (refer to Table 8 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP [AECOM, 2013]). Remediation of these impacts was not considered warranted because the SPGWT was reported within marine sediments (which have been demonstrated to have negligible contaminant flux with the overlying fill) and/or was present at depths significantly below the proposed basement. The increase in basement excavation depth will result in excavation of these SPGWT impacts and therefore result in a greater contaminant mass being removed from the Site than anticipated by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013).

Implementation of the validation requirements detailed in Section 19.5.3 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) will ensure that SPGWT is not present in proximity to the base of the Block 4 basement. In the event that SPGWT impacts are present in the bedrock base of the adjusted (deeper) Block 4 basement, the contingency measures described by Section 23.11 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) would be implemented.

4.1.2 Changes to the Alignment of the Southern Block 4 Basement Groundwater Retention Wall System

The change in alignment of the southern Block 4 retention wall system (as described in Section 2.0) will result in material remaining within Block 4 outside (south of) the alignment of the retention wall system.

Section 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) states that if the southern Block 4 retention wall system is off-set from the existing Stage 1a northern retention wall, the measures described by Section 23.12.4 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013), in relation to changes to the alignment of the northern Block 4 wall, would be undertaken. The measures described by Section 23.12.4 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) include development of additional remediation criteria for material remaining within Block 4 outside the alignment of the retention wall system.

Section 23.12.4 and Section 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) describe contingency measures that should be undertaken if the area remaining within Block 4 outside the alignment of the retention wall system is to be remediated to a standard suitable for a particular future land use. However, the following is noted:

- DA SSD 5897- 2013 includes remediation of areas to a standard suitable for future land use within the Block 4 retention wall system only (in addition to remediation to a standard suitable for the EPA Declaration to be revoked); and

- DA SSD 5897-2013 includes remediation of the area within Block 4 that is outside the retention wall system only to a standard suitable for the EPA Declaration to be revoked (that is to a standard suitable for the current land use). This portion of land is not proposed to be remediated to a standard suitable for future land use as part of DA SSD 5897-2013.

As such, the contingency measures described by Section 23.12.4 and Section 23.12.5 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) are not relevant to DA SSD 5897-2013.

The extent of remediation that will be undertaken within the area of Block 4 that is outside the retention wall system will be consistent with the VMP Remediation Works extent of remediation as shown on Figure 1.

1 For the purposes of this letter, SPGWT refers to: - Tar Containing Materials (TCM) which are defined as described below; and - Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs). The presence or otherwise of TCM is based on comparison of observed site conditions and analytical data to the following criteria: - Greater than 10% visible coal tar (where coal tar is a phase separated hydrocarbon by-product from coal gasification);

and/or - Contaminant concentrations exceeding the following limits:

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): 2,000 mg/kg; or Benzo(a)Pyrene (B(a)P): 150 mg/kg.

Page 28: Lend Lease Development Plans

4 of 6

Remediation, if required, of the area outside the Block 4 retention wall system for future land use will be the subject of a separate Development Application.

Section 19.5.4 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) acknowledges that it will not be possible to directly validate that materials remaining in the Block 4 basement excavation walls are free from SPGWT due to the presence of excavation retention cut-off walls that will be required to support the excavation. Section 19.5.4 of VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) also demonstrates that SPGWT identified by previous investigations in the vicinity of the wall does not represent an unacceptable risk to human health.

With respect to the area within Block 4 outside the alignment of the retention wall system, SPGWT has been identified outside the adjusted wall alignment at the following location:

- BH408 - SPGWT was observed within the natural marine sediments between a depth of 8.0 and 9.4 m bgl (the depth of the underlying bedrock).

As detailed in Section 8.5.1 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013), the SPGWT in the vicinity of BH408 will be removed as part of the VMP Remediation Works that will be undertaken within this area under DA SSD 5897-2013.

4.2 Staging of the Remediation Works

The VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) contemplated that the required remediation works might be staged to occur sequentially as part of the progressing development works. In particular, Section 1.8 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) anticipated that the development and construction sequence and methodology may require that:

- remediation of key site areas (for example Block 4, Block 5 and Hickson Road) be completed and validated (including the preparation of Site Audit Statements) separately, in sequence; and

- remediation within key site areas (for example within Block 4) may be staged.

The following sections of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) are relevant to the management of staged remediation works described by Section 3.0:

- Section 19.2.1 specifically describes the principles for the validation of staged remediation works including the preparation of a Validation Sampling Analysis and Quality Plan(s) (SAQP) and staged preparation of Site Audit Statements;

- Section 19.2.3 mandates the requirement for preparation of a Validation Sampling Analysis and Quality Plan (SAQP) that is specific to each stage of the remediation works. The Validation SAQP will describe the specific requirements for demonstrating that the remediation works have been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013);

- Section 19.5.4 provides specific contingency measures to be implemented to facilitate validation of the Block 4 basement walls in the vicinity of the 1870 gasholder annulus in the event that remediation and validation of Block 4 is required prior to remediation and validation of Hickson Road. These contingency measures are further discussed in Section 4.2.1 and

- Section 23.10 contemplates the potential for changes to the Barangaroo development strategy to affect the proposed remediation works as described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013). The proposed staged remediation as described by Section 3.0 does not constitute a significant change to the Barangaroo development strategy and will not change the remediation works as described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013). As such, the contingency measures described by Section 23.10 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) are not considered relevant to DA SSD 5897-2013.

4.2.1 Validation of the Block 4 Basement Wall

As described by Section 3.0, the proposed staged remediation will result in remediation of Block 4 prior to remediation of Hickson Road. It is noted that the alignment of the proposed Block 4 basement wall passes through the inferred location of the 1870 gasholder annulus. As a consequence, it is possible that part of the 1870 gasholder annulus within Hickson Road may not have been remediated prior to construction of the Block 4 Basement Wall. In consideration of this, the following contingency measures are proposed by Section 19.5.4 of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013):

1) Remediation of SPGWT within the 1870 gasholder in Hickson Rd prior to validation of Block 4; or

Page 29: Lend Lease Development Plans

5 of 6

2) Further assessment of whether the presence of SPGWT within the 1870 gasholder in Hickson Road represents an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. This assessment would be undertaken in consultation with the Site Auditor and may consider:

the outcomes of additional investigations undertaken to more accurately delineate the presence of SPGWT within the gasholder and the gasholder design (for example, the gasholder is thought to consist of an annulus excavated into rock); and,

the design and construction methodology of the retention wall (including how the retention wall will be constructed within the gasholder annulus).

As described by Section 3.0, remediation of Hickson Road (including that portion of the 1870 gasholder within Hickson Road) (and Block 5 within the EPA Declaration Area) will be the subject of a separate DA. Therefore, it is anticipated that further assessment work will be undertaken as part of remediation validation works, in consultation with the Site Auditor, to assess whether the presence of SPGWT within the 1870 gasholder in Hickson Road represents an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. This further assessment will be undertaken prior to final validation of the remediation work to be undertaken within Block 4.

5.0 Up-hydraulic Groundwater Conditions

Based on the available data for the EPA Declaration Area (including Hickson Road which is located up-hydraulic gradient of Block 4), it is considered that the proposed staged remediation works (refer to Section 3.0) will not adversely impact on the groundwater regime within other areas of the EPA Declaration Area (Block 5 and Hickson Rd). This conclusion is based on the following considerations.

- Groundwater flow in and around the proposed Block 4 basement (and the adjacent Stage 1a basement) is tidally influenced. The amount of seawater infiltrating into the site twice per day with the incoming tide is far greater than the amount of terrestrial groundwater flowing onto the site from up gradient areas in the fill material, natural sediments and sandstone bedrock. Terrestrial groundwater flow around the proposed Block 4 basement (and the adjacent Stage 1a basement) from Hickson Road will be low because of the following limiting factors:

the nature of the up gradient urban catchment for groundwater recharge. That is, the majority of rainfall becomes surface water runoff due to the presence of pavements and buildings, leaving little water to infiltrate and recharge the groundwater system; and

the relatively impermeable nature of the sandstone bedrock which restricts groundwater flow.

- The highest concentrations of groundwater contamination currently present within the EPA Declaration Area are present within the proposed Block 4 basement. As such, they will be subject to remediation in accordance with the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) as described by Section 3.0. Therefore, the groundwater quality within the EPA Declaration Area would be expected to improve as a consequence of the proposed remediation works; and

- The migration of groundwater contamination in Block 5 and those areas of Hickson Road that are up-hydraulic gradient of Hickson Road will not change significantly because of the construction of the Block 4 basement for the following reasons:

Overall groundwater flow is towards Darling Harbour, not towards the proposed Block 4 basement; and

Although terrestrial groundwater flow around the proposed Block 4 basement may flow into the Block 5, the flux will be low as discussed above. Therefore, this flow will not result in an appreciable additional migration of contamination.

6.0 Conclusions

Based on the information described above, the following conclusions can be made:

- The proposed Block 4 basement area included in DA SSD 5897-2013 is contemplated by and can be suitably managed by the contingency measures detailed in the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013);

- The proposed staging of the VMP Remediation Works is consistent with and can be suitably managed by the existing provisions of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013);

- The proposed staging of the VMP Remediation will not adversely affect groundwater migration from the area up-hydraulic gradient of Block 4; and

Page 30: Lend Lease Development Plans

AECOM

Notwithstanding the proposed adjustments to the Block 4 basement area (relative to the VMP/Block 4 RAP ([AECOM, 2013]) and staging of the VMP Remediation Works:

• implementation of the VMP Remediation Works described by the VMP/Slock 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) within Block 4 will facilitate revoking of the NSW EPA Declaration from Block 4; and

• implementation of the Block 4 Development Remediation Works described by the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) within the adjusted Block 4 basement in DA SSD 5897-2013 will facilitate the proposed future land use within the adjusted Block 4 basement area.

Based on these conclusions, it is out opinion that amendment of the VMP/Block 4 RAP (AECOM, 2013) is not required for DA SSD 5897-2013.

Yours faithfully

Michael Jo s Brad Eismen Technic D ector - Environment Technical Director - Environment michae [email protected] [email protected]

Mobile. 1 428 532 255

Mobile: +61 410 431 637 Direct Dial: +61 2 8934 0397

Direct Dial: +61 2 8934 0231 Direct Fax: +61 2 8934 0001

end: Figure 1 Attachment 1 - Lend Lease development plans (26 August 2013)

of 6

Page 31: Lend Lease Development Plans

BARANGAROOCENTRAL

(PART)

BLOCK 4

BLOCK 5

ORWN AREA

ORWS RAP AREA

3.00

3.00

CONC.

CONC.

ME

T AL

RO

OF

ME

T AL

RO

OF

HICKSON ROAD

REMEDIATION AND LANDFORMING WORKS, BARANGAROO

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Page 32: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 33: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 34: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 35: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 36: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 37: Lend Lease Development Plans
Page 38: Lend Lease Development Plans

p:\603x\60336060\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\1 stage 1b da studies\11 watermans quay addendum\draft 4\60336060_lt07_stage1b_sw_19april16.docx15 of 15

Attachment 3: Summary Tables

Page 39: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Location BH035 BH035 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41Sample Field ID BH035_ 0.3-0.5 BH035_ 4.0-4.5 BH33_0.75-0.85 BH33_5.0-5.2 BH36_1.0-1.2 BH36_2.5-2.9 BH36_4.0-4.4 BH36-0.07-0.1 BH37_0.06-0.1 BH37_2.5-2.7 BH37_5.5-5.7 BH41_0.07-0.1 BH41_1.0-1.4 BH41_4.0-4.4Sample Depth (m) 0.3-0.5 4.0-4.5 0.75-0.85 5-5.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.9 4-4.4 0.7-0.1 0.06-0.1 2.5-2.7 5.5-5.7 0.07-0.1 1-1.4 4-4.4Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalArea Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 ServicesSample Date 18/05/2006 18/05/2006 2/12/2010 2/12/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 19/02/2010 17/02/2010 17/02/2010 18/02/2010 19/02/2010 4/03/2010 4/03/2010

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 <5 <5 <5 6 <5 - <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 7 <5Barium mg/kg 10 - - - - 10 - 30 20 20 <10 30 20 510 20Beryllium mg/kg 1 - - - - <1 - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Chromium mg/kg 1 180,000 2 16 8 10 8 - 7 2 2 5 8 2 11 7Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 950 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 -Cobalt mg/kg 2 - - - - <2 - <2 12 12 <2 3 13 13 4Copper mg/kg 1 212 10 264 12 <5 - <5 256 225 23 <5 356 11 <5Iron mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - - - - 8730 - 38,400 -Lead mg/kg 1 1800 15,000 7 18 6 36 17 - 9 6 6 9 20 7 17 8Manganese mg/kg 5 - - - - 43 - 73 753 768 9 125 852 682 215Mercury mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Nickel mg/kg 1 6 33 10 12 <2 - 2 7 7 <2 5 11 21 5Vanadium mg/kg 5 22,000 - - - - 12 - 12 119 125 8 15 127 22 10Zinc mg/kg 1 48 38 50 77 14 - 17 51 47 11 28 54 94 34CPAH (TEF) mg/kg 67 - - - <1.21 <1.21 - <1.11 - - - <1.21 - <1.21 <1.21PAH (ESDAT TOTAL) mg/kg - - - <8 <8 - <7 - - - <8 - <8 <8PAH (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kg - - - <8 <8 - <7 - - - <8 - <8 <8Sum of 10 PAHs mg/kg - - - <5 <5 - <4 - - - <5 - <5 <5Sum of 5 PAHs mg/kg - - - <3 <3 - <3 - - - <3 - <3 <32-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 5400 - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 <0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg - - - <4 <4 - <3 - - - <4 - <4 <4PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.53-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5 - - - <1 <1 - <0.5 - - - <1 - <1 <13-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.54-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Phenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Phenolics Total mg/kg - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TPH C15-C36 mg/kg <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 - <200 - - - <200 - <200 <200TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - <10 - - - <10 - <10 <10TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 90,000 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 - <50 - - - <50 - <50 <50TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 - <100 - - - <100 - <100 <100TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 - <100 - - - <100 - <100 <100TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - <10 - - - <10 - <10 <10TPH+C10 - C36 (Sum of total)mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 - <50 - - - <50 - <50 <50Tetrachloroethene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Trichloroethene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -cis-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Vinyl chloride mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Asbestos fibres - 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -weight of sample g 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -PID ppm - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Sample Recovery % - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SPT Blows blows - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - <1 - - - <1 - <1 <1Benzene mg/kg 0.2 190 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Toluene mg/kg 0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

Borehole

TPH

1. CAHs

Phenols

PAHs

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 1 of 12

Page 40: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Location BH035 BH035 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41Sample Field ID BH035_ 0.3-0.5 BH035_ 4.0-4.5 BH33_0.75-0.85 BH33_5.0-5.2 BH36_1.0-1.2 BH36_2.5-2.9 BH36_4.0-4.4 BH36-0.07-0.1 BH37_0.06-0.1 BH37_2.5-2.7 BH37_5.5-5.7 BH41_0.07-0.1 BH41_1.0-1.4 BH41_4.0-4.4Sample Depth (m) 0.3-0.5 4.0-4.5 0.75-0.85 5-5.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.9 4-4.4 0.7-0.1 0.06-0.1 2.5-2.7 5.5-5.7 0.07-0.1 1-1.4 4-4.4Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalArea Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 ServicesSample Date 18/05/2006 18/05/2006 2/12/2010 2/12/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 19/02/2010 17/02/2010 17/02/2010 18/02/2010 19/02/2010 4/03/2010 4/03/2010

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Metals Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Cyanides Cyanide (WAD) mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Herbicides Diallate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -

Ammonia as N mg/kg 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - - <1 - - - - - - - - - -Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - - - - - <1 - - - <1 - <1 <1pH (Final) pH 0.1 - - - - 4.8 9.5 - - - - 4.8 - 7.4 - 4.9 - 9.5 -pH (Initial) pH_Units 0.1 - - - - 9.2 - - - - - 5.4 - 9.3 -Moisture PERCENT_WW0.1 - - 4.2 15.4 8.1 - 14 9.1 8 26.4 18.3 8.7 9.2 22.4Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)% 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -pH (Lab) pH_Units 0.1 - - - 7.8 8.9 - - - - - 5.4 - 8.5 -pH (after HCL) pH 0.1 - - - - 1.7 - - - - - 1.6 - 1.8 -Sulphate mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOC % 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.8 <0.5Weak Acid Dissociable Cyanidemg/kg 1 - - - <1 - - <1 - - - - - <1 <14,4-DDE mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -a-BHC mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -b-BHC mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -cis-Chlordane mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -d-BHC mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -DDT mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg - - - - - - <2 - - - - - - -Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Endrin mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-chlordane mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbophenothion mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -cis-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Diazinon mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dimethoate mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Ethion mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Ethyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Fenthion mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Malathion mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Methyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Monocrotophos mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Pirimphos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Prothiofos mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Safrole mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -trans-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Plasticiser Compounds mg/kg - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Scheduled chemicals (NSW Waste 2008)mg/kg - - - <2 <2 - <10.5 - - - <2 - <2 <2Organic Matter % 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.5 0.6Total BTEX mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Pesticides (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kg - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <4 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Demeton-S-methyl mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Fenamiphos mg/kg 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Parathion mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Polychlorinated BiphenylsPCBs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Acid Reacted Calcium % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -acidity - Acid Reacted Calciummole H+/t 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesiummole H+/t 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfurmole H+/t 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ANC Fineness Factor - 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Calcium in Peroxide % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SPOCAS

Organophosphorous Pesticides

other

Pesticides

Organochlorine Pesticides

Inorganics

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 2 of 12

Page 41: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Location BH035 BH035 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41Sample Field ID BH035_ 0.3-0.5 BH035_ 4.0-4.5 BH33_0.75-0.85 BH33_5.0-5.2 BH36_1.0-1.2 BH36_2.5-2.9 BH36_4.0-4.4 BH36-0.07-0.1 BH37_0.06-0.1 BH37_2.5-2.7 BH37_5.5-5.7 BH41_0.07-0.1 BH41_1.0-1.4 BH41_4.0-4.4Sample Depth (m) 0.3-0.5 4.0-4.5 0.75-0.85 5-5.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.9 4-4.4 0.7-0.1 0.06-0.1 2.5-2.7 5.5-5.7 0.07-0.1 1-1.4 4-4.4Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalArea Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 ServicesSample Date 18/05/2006 18/05/2006 2/12/2010 2/12/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 19/02/2010 17/02/2010 17/02/2010 18/02/2010 19/02/2010 4/03/2010 4/03/2010

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Metals KCl Extractable Calcium % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -KCl Extractable Magnesium% 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Liming Rate kg CaCO3/t 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Magnesium in Peroxide % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Net Acidity (acidity units) mole H+/t 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Net Acidity (sulfur units) %S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -pH (KCl) pH Unit 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -pH (Ox) pH Unit 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium% S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium%S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity%S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity%S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity%S 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Sulfur in Peroxide % 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Titratable Actual Acidity mole H+/t 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzenemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1-naphthylamine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2-(acetylamino) fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2,4,5-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52,4,6-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52,4-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -2,6-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.52,6-dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -2-chlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -2-hexanone (MBK) mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -2-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -2-Picoline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -3,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -3-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -4-(dimethylamino) azobenzenemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-aminobiphenyl mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-bromophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-chloroaniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-chlorophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2-methyl-5-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracenemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Aniline mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Azobenzene mg/kg 1 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ethermg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Carbazole mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chlorobenzilate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dibenzofuran mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Diethylphthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dimethyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Di-n-butyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Di-n-octyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Hexachlorocyclopentadienemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <2.5 - - - - - - -Hexachloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Hexachlorophene mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Hexachloropropene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Methapyrilene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Nitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-Nitrosodiphenyl & Diphenylaminemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -N-nitrosodiethylamine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-nitrosodi-n-butylamine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-Nitrosomethylethylaminemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-nitrosomorpholine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-nitrosopiperidine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -N-nitrosopyrrolidine mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -Pentachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Pentachlorophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - <2 <2 - <1 - - - <2 - <2 <2

SVOCs

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 3 of 12

Page 42: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Location BH035 BH035 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41Sample Field ID BH035_ 0.3-0.5 BH035_ 4.0-4.5 BH33_0.75-0.85 BH33_5.0-5.2 BH36_1.0-1.2 BH36_2.5-2.9 BH36_4.0-4.4 BH36-0.07-0.1 BH37_0.06-0.1 BH37_2.5-2.7 BH37_5.5-5.7 BH41_0.07-0.1 BH41_1.0-1.4 BH41_4.0-4.4Sample Depth (m) 0.3-0.5 4.0-4.5 0.75-0.85 5-5.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.9 4-4.4 0.7-0.1 0.06-0.1 2.5-2.7 5.5-5.7 0.07-0.1 1-1.4 4-4.4Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalArea Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 ServicesSample Date 18/05/2006 18/05/2006 2/12/2010 2/12/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 19/02/2010 17/02/2010 17/02/2010 18/02/2010 19/02/2010 4/03/2010 4/03/2010

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Metals Phenacetin mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1,1-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1,2-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,1-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2,3-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2,3-trichloropropane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2,4-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2,4-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 370 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropanemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2-dibromoethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,3,5-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,3-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,3-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -1,4-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -2-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -4-Methyl-2-pentanone mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Bromobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Bromoform mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Bromomethane mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Carbon disulfide mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Carbon tetrachloride mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chlorodibromomethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chloroethane mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Chloroform mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Chloromethane mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -cis-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dibromomethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Hexachlorobutadiene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Iodomethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Isophorone mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -n-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -n-propylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Pentachloroethane mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -p-isopropyltoluene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -sec-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Styrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -tert-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -trans-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -trans-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butenemg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -Vinyl acetate mg/kg 5 - - - - - - <5 - - - - - - -

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct ContactSample collected from natural marine sedimentsHighlighted COPC - a corresponding MWQC relates to this COPC (refer to Table T2)

COPC Highlighted COPC - an 'Additional COPC'Highlighted samples - indicates indicative material to be partlyremoved as part of excavations to 2.7 m bgl

VOCs

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 4 of 12

Page 43: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5Chromium mg/kg 1 180,000Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 950Cobalt mg/kg 2Copper mg/kg 1Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 15,000Manganese mg/kg 5Mercury mg/kg 0.1Nickel mg/kg 1Vanadium mg/kg 5 22,000Zinc mg/kg 1CPAH (TEF) mg/kg 67PAH (ESDAT TOTAL) mg/kgPAH (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgSum of 10 PAHs mg/kgSum of 5 PAHs mg/kg2-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 54003-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kgPAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C15-C36 mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 90,000TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2TPH+C10 - C36 (Sum of total)mg/kg 50Tetrachloroethene mg/kg 0.5Trichloroethene mg/kg 0.5cis-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5Vinyl chloride mg/kg 5Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01PID ppmSample Recovery %SPT Blows blowsTotal Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 190Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2Toluene mg/kg 0.2Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

Borehole

TPH

1. CAHs

Phenols

PAHs

BH109 BH109 BH113 BH113 BH114 BH114 BH159 BH159 BH211 BH211 BH211 BH408 BH409 BH409BH109 0.3_0.5 BH109 3.0_3.45 BH113 1.5_1.95 BH113 3.0_3.45 BH114 0.3_0.5 BH114 3.0_3.45 BH159_0.25-0.35 D1408-8 BH211_14 - 14.45 BH211_15.5 - 15.6_26/03/2008BH211_16.05 - 16.15_26/03/2008BH408_2.0-2.4 BH409_3.7-4.0 BH409_5.0-5.30.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45 0.25-0.35 14-14.45 15.5-15.6 16.05-16.15 2-2.4 3.7-4 5-5.3Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Clayey Sand Natural Sandstone Fill Fill Natural SandNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 28/06/2006 14/08/2006 14/08/2006 26/03/2008 26/03/2008 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 14/02/2011

<5 <5 <5 5 <5 6 - - <5 11 <5 <5 <5 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <13 41 10 33 4 37 - - 6 13 21 8 15 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

225 20 <5 12 198 12 - - <5 <5 <5 36 <5 <5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12 14 9 17 15 15 - - 8 5 7 10 6 <5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.16 8 4 8 5 7 - - 5 <2 2 8 <2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -53 34 21 52 54 47 - - 28 <5 12 30 8 7

<1.21 <1.21 <1.21 0.878 2.225 <1.21 <1.21 <1.11 - - - 9.097 <1.21 0.06<8 <8 <8 9.2 15 <8 <8 <7 <8 19.45 <8 74.5 <8 56.7<8 <8 <8 9.2 15 <8 <8 <7 <8 19.45 <8 74.5 <8 56.7<5 <5 <5 6.8 14 <5 <5 <4 - - - 62.2 <5 3.6<3 <3 <3 2.4 1 <3 <3 <3 - - - 12.3 <3 53.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5.6<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.9 <0.5 2.2 <0.5 2.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.4 <0.5 3.5 <0.5 1.9<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 6.2 <0.5 0.6<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 1.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 6.3 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 2 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - 7.1 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - 3.1 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 5.2 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 2.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2 <0.5 12.6 <0.5 1.2<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.2<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 33.8<4 <4 <4 3.2 9.2 <4 <4 <3 <3 <3 <3 36.7 <4 0.6 - - - 9.2 24.2 - - - - - - 111.2 - 57.3

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <0.5 6.6 <0.5 6.8<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 2.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 <0.5 12.9 <0.5 1.8 - - - - - - - - <0.5 0.6 <0.5 0.03 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<200 130 <200 1010 340 980 1230 280 - - - 450 <200 180<2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <10 <10 19 <10 <10 <10 12<50 <50 <50 70 <50 60 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 150<100 <100 <100 540 130 620 270 <100 <100 <100 <100 190 <100 180<100 130 <100 470 210 360 960 280 <100 <100 <100 260 <100 <100<2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 12

<250 130 <250 1080 340 1040 1230 280 <250 <250 <250 450 <50 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 318 274 - - - - - - - - - - - 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33 - - - -

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 0.3 <1.5 - 0 - 5.1 - <1 <1 2.9<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 3.4 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 1.8<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.5<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 5.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.3 <1 <0.5 3.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.1

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 5 of 12

Page 44: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2Cyanides Cyanide (WAD) mg/kg 1Herbicides Diallate mg/kg 0.5

Ammonia as N mg/kg 20Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1Cyanide Total mg/kg 1pH (Final) pH 0.1pH (Initial) pH_Units 0.1Moisture PERCENT_WW0.1Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)% 1pH (Lab) pH_Units 0.1pH (after HCL) pH 0.1Sulphate mg/kg 100TOC % 0.5Weak Acid Dissociable Cyanidemg/kg 14,4-DDE mg/kg 0.05a-BHC mg/kg 0.05Aldrin mg/kg 0.05Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kgb-BHC mg/kg 0.05cis-Chlordane mg/kg 0.05d-BHC mg/kg 0.05DDD mg/kg 0.05DDT mg/kg 0.2DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kgDieldrin mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05Endrin mg/kg 0.05Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.2trans-chlordane mg/kg 0.05Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.05Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05Carbophenothion mg/kg 0.05Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg 0.05Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.05Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg 0.05cis-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5Diazinon mg/kg 0.05Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.05Dimethoate mg/kg 0.05Ethion mg/kg 0.05Ethyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5Fenthion mg/kg 0.05Malathion mg/kg 0.05Methyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2Monocrotophos mg/kg 0.2Pirimphos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05Prothiofos mg/kg 0.05Safrole mg/kg 0.5trans-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5Plasticiser Compounds mg/kgScheduled chemicals (NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgOrganic Matter % 0.5Total BTEX mg/kg 1Pesticides (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgDemeton-S-methyl mg/kg 0.05Fenamiphos mg/kg 0.05Parathion mg/kg 0.2

Polychlorinated BiphenylsPCBs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.1Acid Reacted Calcium % 0.02acidity - Acid Reacted Calciummole H+/t 10acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesiummole H+/t 10acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfurmole H+/t 10ANC Fineness Factor - 0.5Calcium in Peroxide % 0.02

SPOCAS

Organophosphorous Pesticides

other

Pesticides

Organochlorine Pesticides

Inorganics

BH109 BH109 BH113 BH113 BH114 BH114 BH159 BH159 BH211 BH211 BH211 BH408 BH409 BH409BH109 0.3_0.5 BH109 3.0_3.45 BH113 1.5_1.95 BH113 3.0_3.45 BH114 0.3_0.5 BH114 3.0_3.45 BH159_0.25-0.35 D1408-8 BH211_14 - 14.45 BH211_15.5 - 15.6_26/03/2008BH211_16.05 - 16.15_26/03/2008BH408_2.0-2.4 BH409_3.7-4.0 BH409_5.0-5.30.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45 0.25-0.35 14-14.45 15.5-15.6 16.05-16.15 2-2.4 3.7-4 5-5.3Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Clayey Sand Natural Sandstone Fill Fill Natural SandNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 28/06/2006 14/08/2006 14/08/2006 26/03/2008 26/03/2008 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 14/02/2011

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.7 4.9 - 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.8 - - - - - - - - 2 - - - 12.7 - 12.8 16.7 - 17 31.24.7 8.9 8.2 11.3 3.5 11 2.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.6 -

<100 130 <100 320 150 160 210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.03 <0.03 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.3 <0.1 - - - <0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 6 of 12

Page 45: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals KCl Extractable Calcium % 0.02KCl Extractable Magnesium% 0.02Liming Rate kg CaCO3/t 1Magnesium in Peroxide % 0.02Net Acidity (acidity units) mole H+/t 10Net Acidity (sulfur units) %S 0.02Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur % 0.02pH (KCl) pH Unit 0.1pH (Ox) pH Unit 0.1sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium% S 0.02sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity%S 0.02Sulfur in Peroxide % 0.02Titratable Actual Acidity mole H+/t 21,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzenemg/kg 0.51,3,5-Trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,3,5-Trinitrobenzene mg/kg 0.51-naphthylamine mg/kg 0.52-(acetylamino) fluorene mg/kg 0.52,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4,5-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4,6-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.52,6-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,6-dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.52-chlorophenol mg/kg 0.01Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/kg 52-hexanone (MBK) mg/kg 52-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.52-Picoline mg/kg 0.53,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/kg 0.53-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.54-(dimethylamino) azobenzenemg/kg 0.54-aminobiphenyl mg/kg 0.54-bromophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.54-chloroaniline mg/kg 0.54-chlorophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.54-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.54-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide mg/kg 0.52-methyl-5-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.57,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracenemg/kg 0.5Aniline mg/kg 0.5Azobenzene mg/kg 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemg/kg 0.5Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ethermg/kg 0.5Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/kg 0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Carbazole mg/kg 0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/kg 0.5Dibenzofuran mg/kg 0.5Diethylphthalate mg/kg 0.5Dimethyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Di-n-butyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Di-n-octyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadienemg/kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/kg 0.5Hexachlorophene mg/kg 0.01Hexachloropropene mg/kg 0.5Methapyrilene mg/kg 0.5Nitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5N-Nitrosodiphenyl & Diphenylaminemg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodiethylamine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodi-n-butylamine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/kg 0.5N-Nitrosomethylethylaminemg/kg 0.5N-nitrosomorpholine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosopiperidine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosopyrrolidine mg/kg 0.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachlorophenol mg/kg 0.01

SVOCs

BH109 BH109 BH113 BH113 BH114 BH114 BH159 BH159 BH211 BH211 BH211 BH408 BH409 BH409BH109 0.3_0.5 BH109 3.0_3.45 BH113 1.5_1.95 BH113 3.0_3.45 BH114 0.3_0.5 BH114 3.0_3.45 BH159_0.25-0.35 D1408-8 BH211_14 - 14.45 BH211_15.5 - 15.6_26/03/2008BH211_16.05 - 16.15_26/03/2008BH408_2.0-2.4 BH409_3.7-4.0 BH409_5.0-5.30.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45 0.25-0.35 14-14.45 15.5-15.6 16.05-16.15 2-2.4 3.7-4 5-5.3Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Clayey Sand Natural Sandstone Fill Fill Natural SandNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 28/06/2006 14/08/2006 14/08/2006 26/03/2008 26/03/2008 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 14/02/2011

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <2 <2 <2 <0.01 <0.01 -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 7 of 12

Page 46: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals Phenacetin mg/kg 0.51,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,1-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,2-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.51,2,3-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2,3-trichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,2,4-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2,4-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3701,2-dibromo-3-chloropropanemg/kg 0.51,2-dibromoethane mg/kg 0.51,2-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,3,5-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.51,3-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,3-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,4-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.52,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.52-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.54-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.54-Methyl-2-pentanone mg/kg 5Bromobenzene mg/kg 0.5Bromodichloromethane mg/kg 0.5Bromoform mg/kg 0.5Bromomethane mg/kg 5Carbon disulfide mg/kg 0.5Carbon tetrachloride mg/kg 0.5Chlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5Chlorodibromomethane mg/kg 0.5Chloroethane mg/kg 5Chloroform mg/kg 0.5Chloromethane mg/kg 5cis-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene mg/kg 0.5Dibromomethane mg/kg 0.5Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/kg 5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/kg 0.5Iodomethane mg/kg 0.5Isophorone mg/kg 0.5Isopropylbenzene mg/kg 0.5n-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5n-propylbenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachloroethane mg/kg 0.5p-isopropyltoluene mg/kg 0.5sec-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5Styrene mg/kg 0.5tert-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butenemg/kg 0.5Trichlorofluoromethane mg/kg 5Vinyl acetate mg/kg 5

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct ContactSample collected from natural marine sedimentsHighlighted COPC - a corresponding MWQC relates to this COPC (refer to Table T2)

COPC Highlighted COPC - an 'Additional COPC'Highlighted samples - indicates indicative material to be partlyremoved as part of excavations to 2.7 m bgl

VOCs

BH109 BH109 BH113 BH113 BH114 BH114 BH159 BH159 BH211 BH211 BH211 BH408 BH409 BH409BH109 0.3_0.5 BH109 3.0_3.45 BH113 1.5_1.95 BH113 3.0_3.45 BH114 0.3_0.5 BH114 3.0_3.45 BH159_0.25-0.35 D1408-8 BH211_14 - 14.45 BH211_15.5 - 15.6_26/03/2008BH211_16.05 - 16.15_26/03/2008BH408_2.0-2.4 BH409_3.7-4.0 BH409_5.0-5.30.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45 0.25-0.35 14-14.45 15.5-15.6 16.05-16.15 2-2.4 3.7-4 5-5.3Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Clayey Sand Natural Sandstone Fill Fill Natural SandNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 28/06/2006 14/08/2006 14/08/2006 26/03/2008 26/03/2008 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 14/02/2011

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 8 of 12

Page 47: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5Chromium mg/kg 1 180,000Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 950Cobalt mg/kg 2Copper mg/kg 1Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 15,000Manganese mg/kg 5Mercury mg/kg 0.1Nickel mg/kg 1Vanadium mg/kg 5 22,000Zinc mg/kg 1CPAH (TEF) mg/kg 67PAH (ESDAT TOTAL) mg/kgPAH (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgSum of 10 PAHs mg/kgSum of 5 PAHs mg/kg2-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 54003-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kgPAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C15-C36 mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 90,000TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2TPH+C10 - C36 (Sum of total)mg/kg 50Tetrachloroethene mg/kg 0.5Trichloroethene mg/kg 0.5cis-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5Vinyl chloride mg/kg 5Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01PID ppmSample Recovery %SPT Blows blowsTotal Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 190Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2Toluene mg/kg 0.2Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

Borehole

TPH

1. CAHs

Phenols

PAHs

TBH01 TBH01 TBH01DUP 01 TBH01_0.43-0.5 TRIP010.43-0.5 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5Fill Fill FillField_D Normal Interlab_DBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services5/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011

<5 <5 2.4 - - - - - -<1 <1 <0.516 12 10 - - - - - -12 11 31 - - -71 103 120 - - -

<0.1 0.2 <0.14 4 <5 - - -24 30 25

<1.21 2.22 1.1541.4 16.5 6.21.4 16.5 6.21.4 14.8 6.2<3 1.7 <3 - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - -

<0.5 0.5 <0.5<0.5 1.9 0.8<0.5 1.7 1 - - 1.7

<0.5 1.8 -<0.5 0.6 0.7<0.5 0.7 -<0.5 1.4 0.7<0.5 <0.5 <0.50.7 3.1 1.3<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 0.6 0.6<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<4 8.7 3.81.4 25.2 7.9<0.5 1.2 <0.50.7 3 1.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<200 <200 <200<10 <10 <10<50 <50 <50<100 <100 <100<100 <100 <100<10 <10 <10<50 <50 <100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<1 <1 <0.15

<0.2 <0.2 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <1

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 9 of 12

Page 48: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2Cyanides Cyanide (WAD) mg/kg 1Herbicides Diallate mg/kg 0.5

Ammonia as N mg/kg 20Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1Cyanide Total mg/kg 1pH (Final) pH 0.1pH (Initial) pH_Units 0.1Moisture PERCENT_WW0.1Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)% 1pH (Lab) pH_Units 0.1pH (after HCL) pH 0.1Sulphate mg/kg 100TOC % 0.5Weak Acid Dissociable Cyanidemg/kg 14,4-DDE mg/kg 0.05a-BHC mg/kg 0.05Aldrin mg/kg 0.05Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kgb-BHC mg/kg 0.05cis-Chlordane mg/kg 0.05d-BHC mg/kg 0.05DDD mg/kg 0.05DDT mg/kg 0.2DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kgDieldrin mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05Endrin mg/kg 0.05Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.2trans-chlordane mg/kg 0.05Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.05Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05Carbophenothion mg/kg 0.05Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg 0.05Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.05Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg 0.05cis-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5Diazinon mg/kg 0.05Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.05Dimethoate mg/kg 0.05Ethion mg/kg 0.05Ethyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5Fenthion mg/kg 0.05Malathion mg/kg 0.05Methyl methanesulfonate mg/kg 0.5Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2Monocrotophos mg/kg 0.2Pirimphos-ethyl mg/kg 0.05Prothiofos mg/kg 0.05Safrole mg/kg 0.5trans-Isosafrole mg/kg 0.5Plasticiser Compounds mg/kgScheduled chemicals (NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgOrganic Matter % 0.5Total BTEX mg/kg 1Pesticides (total, NSW Waste 2008)mg/kgDemeton-S-methyl mg/kg 0.05Fenamiphos mg/kg 0.05Parathion mg/kg 0.2

Polychlorinated BiphenylsPCBs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.1Acid Reacted Calcium % 0.02acidity - Acid Reacted Calciummole H+/t 10acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesiummole H+/t 10acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfurmole H+/t 10ANC Fineness Factor - 0.5Calcium in Peroxide % 0.02

SPOCAS

Organophosphorous Pesticides

other

Pesticides

Organochlorine Pesticides

Inorganics

TBH01 TBH01 TBH01DUP 01 TBH01_0.43-0.5 TRIP010.43-0.5 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5Fill Fill FillField_D Normal Interlab_DBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services5/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13.4 12.4 - - - 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 10 of 12

Page 49: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals KCl Extractable Calcium % 0.02KCl Extractable Magnesium% 0.02Liming Rate kg CaCO3/t 1Magnesium in Peroxide % 0.02Net Acidity (acidity units) mole H+/t 10Net Acidity (sulfur units) %S 0.02Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur % 0.02pH (KCl) pH Unit 0.1pH (Ox) pH Unit 0.1sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium% S 0.02sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity%S 0.02sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity%S 0.02Sulfur in Peroxide % 0.02Titratable Actual Acidity mole H+/t 21,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzenemg/kg 0.51,3,5-Trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,3,5-Trinitrobenzene mg/kg 0.51-naphthylamine mg/kg 0.52-(acetylamino) fluorene mg/kg 0.52,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4,5-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4,6-trichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,4-Dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.52,6-dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.012,6-dinitrotoluene mg/kg 0.52-chlorophenol mg/kg 0.01Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/kg 52-hexanone (MBK) mg/kg 52-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.52-Picoline mg/kg 0.53,3-Dichlorobenzidine mg/kg 0.53-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.54-(dimethylamino) azobenzenemg/kg 0.54-aminobiphenyl mg/kg 0.54-bromophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.54-chloroaniline mg/kg 0.54-chlorophenyl phenyl ethermg/kg 0.54-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.54-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide mg/kg 0.52-methyl-5-nitroaniline mg/kg 0.57,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracenemg/kg 0.5Aniline mg/kg 0.5Azobenzene mg/kg 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemg/kg 0.5Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ethermg/kg 0.5Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate mg/kg 0.5Butyl benzyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Carbazole mg/kg 0.5Chlorobenzilate mg/kg 0.5Dibenzofuran mg/kg 0.5Diethylphthalate mg/kg 0.5Dimethyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Di-n-butyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Di-n-octyl phthalate mg/kg 0.5Hexachlorocyclopentadienemg/kg 0.5Hexachloroethane mg/kg 0.5Hexachlorophene mg/kg 0.01Hexachloropropene mg/kg 0.5Methapyrilene mg/kg 0.5Nitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5N-Nitrosodiphenyl & Diphenylaminemg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodiethylamine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodi-n-butylamine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/kg 0.5N-Nitrosomethylethylaminemg/kg 0.5N-nitrosomorpholine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosopiperidine mg/kg 0.5N-nitrosopyrrolidine mg/kg 0.5Pentachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachloronitrobenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachlorophenol mg/kg 0.01

SVOCs

TBH01 TBH01 TBH01DUP 01 TBH01_0.43-0.5 TRIP010.43-0.5 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5Fill Fill FillField_D Normal Interlab_DBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services5/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 11 of 12

Page 50: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1Soil Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName outputunit

EQL ASC NEPM(NEPC, 2013) EIL

Hybrid Criteria,Declaration SiteHHERA (2011)

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160Metals Phenacetin mg/kg 0.51,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,1-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1,2-trichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.51,1-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.51,2,3-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2,3-trichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,2,4-trichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2,4-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3701,2-dibromo-3-chloropropanemg/kg 0.51,2-dibromoethane mg/kg 0.51,2-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,2-dichloroethane mg/kg 0.51,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,3,5-trimethylbenzene mg/kg 0.51,3-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.51,3-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.51,4-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.52,2-dichloropropane mg/kg 0.52-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.54-chlorotoluene mg/kg 0.54-Methyl-2-pentanone mg/kg 5Bromobenzene mg/kg 0.5Bromodichloromethane mg/kg 0.5Bromoform mg/kg 0.5Bromomethane mg/kg 5Carbon disulfide mg/kg 0.5Carbon tetrachloride mg/kg 0.5Chlorobenzene mg/kg 0.5Chlorodibromomethane mg/kg 0.5Chloroethane mg/kg 5Chloroform mg/kg 0.5Chloromethane mg/kg 5cis-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene mg/kg 0.5Dibromomethane mg/kg 0.5Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/kg 5Hexachlorobutadiene mg/kg 0.5Iodomethane mg/kg 0.5Isophorone mg/kg 0.5Isopropylbenzene mg/kg 0.5n-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5n-propylbenzene mg/kg 0.5Pentachloroethane mg/kg 0.5p-isopropyltoluene mg/kg 0.5sec-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5Styrene mg/kg 0.5tert-butylbenzene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,2-dichloroethene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,3-dichloropropene mg/kg 0.5trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butenemg/kg 0.5Trichlorofluoromethane mg/kg 5Vinyl acetate mg/kg 5

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct ContactSample collected from natural marine sedimentsHighlighted COPC - a corresponding MWQC relates to this COPC (refer to Table T2)

COPC Highlighted COPC - an 'Additional COPC'Highlighted samples - indicates indicative material to be partlyremoved as part of excavations to 2.7 m bgl

VOCs

TBH01 TBH01 TBH01DUP 01 TBH01_0.43-0.5 TRIP010.43-0.5 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5Fill Fill FillField_D Normal Interlab_DBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services5/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Data Entry:Data Review:AECOM Table T1 Services Zone soil.xlsm

24/03/2016Page 12 of 12

Page 51: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T2Groundwater Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Field_ID D01_120508 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 FILTRATE MW22 MW22 MW22 MW45Location_Code BH209 BH209 BH209 BH209 BH209 BH116 BH116 BH116 AECOM_BH45Well MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW22 MW22 MW22 MW45Sampled_Date_Time 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 16/03/2010 28/02/2011 28/02/2011 17/07/2006 7/05/2008 15/03/2010 19/03/2010Sample_Type Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalLab_Report_Number 37583 ES0806635 ES1004956 ES1104220 ES1104220 ES0608744 ES0806416 ES1004782 ES1005244

Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL MWQC Hydrid criteria, PDA HHERA (2012)

Pronamide µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2PAHs CPAH (TEF) µg/L <22.2 <4.356 3.2 0.9 <0.192 <1.92 <1.92 <4.44 <4.44

PAH (ESDAT TOTAL) µg/L 267 281.3 753 26.6 2 14.9 <15.5 <28 8PAH (total, NSW Waste 2008) µg/L 177 281.3 753 26.6 2 14.9 <15.5 <28 8Sum of 10 PAHs µg/L <80 6.7 15 4.8 <0.95 <9.5 <9.5 <16 <16Sum of 5 PAHs µg/L 177 274.6 738 21.8 2 14.9 <6 <12 82-chloronaphthalene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <22-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 2.1 38,000 - - 14 - <0.1 - - <2 <23-methylcholanthrene µg/L 0.1 - - <2 - <0.1 - - <2 <2Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 5.8 <10 8.1 7 1.8 <0.1 1.2 <1 <2 <2Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 5.8 57,000 37 50 26 6.2 <0.1 1.1 <1 <2 <2Acetophenone µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Anthracene µg/L 0.1 0.01 <10 5.6 4 1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Benz(a)anthracene µg/L 0.1 0.01 570,000 <10 <1.8 2 1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Benzo(a) pyrene µg/L 0.05 0.1 <10 <1.8 3 0.8 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <2 <2Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene µg/L 4 0.01 <20 - <4 - - - - <4 <4Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 0.01 - <1.8 - <1 <0.1 <1 <1 - - Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/L 0.1 0.001 <10 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 0.01 - <1.8 - <1 <0.1 <1 <1 - - Chrysene µg/L 0.1 0.001 <10 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/L 0.1 0.1 <10 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 1 <10 3.2 4 1.2 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Fluorene µg/L 0.1 3 17 18.9 10 <1 <0.1 1.4 <1 <2 <2Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene µg/L 0.1 0.01 <10 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 70 30,000 108 175 677 10.8 2 9.9 <1 <2 8Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 0.6 15 17 14 2 <0.1 1.3 <1 <2 <2Pyrene µg/L 0.1 0.025 <10 3.5 6 1.8 <0.1 <1 <1 <2 <2PAHs (Sum of total) µg/L 2 177 - 753 - - - - <2 8

Phenols 2,4-dimethylphenol µg/L 0.1 2 720,000 697 466 10 1.2 0.4 - <1 <2 <22-methylphenol µg/L 0.1 13 4,900,000 1230 591 6 <1 0.6 - <1 <2 <22-nitrophenol µg/L 0.1 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.2 - <1 <2 <23-&4-methylphenol µg/L 2 13 270,000 618 328 <4 <2 - - <2 <4 <43-Methylphenol µg/L 0.1 13 - - - - 0.5 - - - - 4-chloro-3-methylphenol µg/L 0.05 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 - <1 <2 <24-methylphenol µg/L 0.1 13 - - - - <0.2 - - - - 4-nitrophenol µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.2 - - - - Phenol µg/L 0.1 400 23,000,000 234 115 <2 <1 1.1 - <1 <2 <2Phenolics Total mg/L 2.779 - - - - - - - - TRH C6-C9 mg/L 0.02 1400 5.4 8.15 1.38 0.1 - 0.03 0.03 <0.02 <0.02TRH C10-C14 mg/L 0.05 0.04 21 5.39 7.98 2.23 0.1 - 0.09 0.1 <0.05 <0.05TRH C15-C28 mg/L 0.1 220 1 1.9 1 0.22 - 0.4 0.2 <0.1 <0.1TRH C29-C36 mg/L 0.05 250 0.7 <0.05 0.16 <0.05 - <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05TRH C10-36 (Total) mg/L 0.05 7.09 9.88 3.39 0.32 - 0.49 0.3 <0.05 <0.05

1. CAHs Tetrachloroethene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Trichloroethene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5cis-1,2-dichloroethene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Vinyl chloride ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Benzene ug/L 1 700 3400 2780 2370 772 56 - 5 2 <1 <1Ethylbenzene ug/L 2 80 210,000 123 118 149 15 - <2 <2 <2 <2Toluene ug/L 2 180 760,000 1520 1700 48 5 - 4 <5 <5 <5Xylene (m & p) ug/L 2 75 372 380 76 8 - 2 <2 <2 <2Xylene (o) ug/L 2 75 657 275 104 10 - <2 <2 <2 <2Total Xylene (ESDAT) ug/L 1029 655 180 18 - 2 <4 <4 <4

Inorganics Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/L 1 - 230 280 - - - 233 191 44Ammonia as N mg/L 0.01 0.91 15,000 13.1 12 7.48 - - - 1.24 2.7 <0.1Anions Total mg/L 0.01 - 506 567 - - - 544 627 524Bicarbonate mg/L 1 - 230 - - - - 233 - - Bicarbonate as CaCO3 mg/L 1 - - 280 - - - - 191 44Alkalinity (Bicarbonate as CaCO3)mg/L 1 - - 280 - - - - - - Alkalinity (Carbonate as CaCO3)mg/L 1 - - <1 - - - - - - Carbonate mg/L 1 - <1 <1 - - - <1 <1 <1Cations Total meq/L 0.01 - 459 568 - - - 515 632 556Chloride mg/L 0.5 18,600 15,800 18,500 - - - 17,300 20,500 17,000Cyanide (Free) mg/L 0.004 0.004 - - <0.004 <0.004 - - - - <0.004Cyanide Total mg/L 0.004 0.004 0.8 0.469 - - - 0.014 <0.004 - - Ferrous Iron mg/L 0.05 - - 9.52 - - - - 3.56 - Fluoride mg/L 0.02 - - - - - - - - 0.4Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/L 1 - <1 <1 - - - <1 <1 <1Ionic Balance % 0.01 - 4.89 0.12 - - - 2.8 0.37 3.03Nitrate (as N) mg/L 0.01 - - 0.1 - - - - <0.01 0.03Nitrite (as N) mg/L 0.01 - - <0.01 - - - - <0.01 <0.01Nitrogen (Total Oxidised) mg/L 0.01 - - 0.1 - - - - <0.01 0.03pH (Lab) pH_Units 0.01 - - 7.1 - - - - 7.24 6.25Reactive Phosphorus as P mg/L 0.01 - - - - - - - - <0.01Sulphate mg/L 0.5 2160 2690 1900 - - 2140 2480 2220 2100Sulphur as S mg/L 1 - - 645 - - - - - 588TOC mg/L 1 - - 9 - - - - 3 3Hardness as CaCO3 mg/L 1 - - 5530 - - - - - - Weak Acid Dissociable Cyanidemg/L 0.004 - - <0.004 <0.004 - - - - <0.004

Metals Aluminium (Filtered) mg/L 0.01 - - - 0.01 - - - - - Antimony (Filtered) µg/L 0.5 - - - <0.5 - - - - - Arsenic (Filtered) µg/L 0.5 2.3 380,000 <25 <0.5 2.9 1.1 - <1 0.5 <0.5 1.1Barium (Filtered) mg/L 0.001 - - 0.083 0.048 - - - 0.061 0.062Beryllium (Filtered) µg/L 0.1 - - 0.2 0.1 - - - <0.1 0.1Cadmium (Filtered) µg/L 0.1 0.7 15,000 <1 0.2 0.4 0.5 - <0.1 0.6 <0.2 11.5Calcium mg/L 1 441 380 - - - - 412 - - Calcium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - - 383 - - - - 412 588Chromium (Filtered) µg/L 0.5 27.4 8,400,000 <5 <0.5 10.2 <0.5 - <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium (hexavalent) mg/L 0.002 0.0044 7.6 - - 0.005 - - - - <0.002 <0.002Cobalt (Filtered) µg/L 0.2 1 260,000 - - 1.3 0.3 - - - <0.2 8Copper (Filtered) µg/L 1 1.3 <10 <1 <1 <1 - <1 <1 <1 <1Iron (Filtered) mg/L 0.05 - - 10 - - - - 3.3 187Lead (Filtered) µg/L 0.2 4.4 1,100,000 <1 <0.2 17.6 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 0.2 0.2Magnesium mg/L 1 1200 1080 - - - - 1120 - - Magnesium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - - 1110 - - - - 1230 1120Manganese (Filtered) mg/L 0.0005 2400 - - 0.0492 0.018 - - - 0.269 4.89Mercury (Filtered) µg/L 0.1 0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Nickel (Filtered) µg/L 0.5 70 350,000 38 60.9 20.6 55.7 - 4 47.4 <0.5 36Potassium mg/L 1 383 418 - - - - 274 - - Potassium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - - 353 - - - - 357 259Selenium (Filtered) µg/L 2 - - - <2 - - - - - Silver (Filtered) µg/L 0.1 - - - 0.3 - - - - - Sodium mg/L 1 9590 7830 - - - - 9080 - - Sodium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - - 10,300 - - - - 11,500 9850Vanadium (Filtered) µg/L 0.5 100 960,000 - - 22.8 1 - - - <0.5 <0.5Zinc (Filtered) mg/L 0.005 0.015 <0.02 0.009 0.613 0.006 - 0.024 0.011 0.008 0.014

Inorganic Alkalinity mg/L 5 230 - - - - - - - - Electrical conductivity *(lab) uS/cm - - - - - - - - -

SVOCs 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <21-naphthylamine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <22-(acetylamino) fluorene µg/L 0.1 - - <2 - <0.1 - - <2 <2

Screened within fill, sand and rock to

12.7m

Monitoring well screening details Screened within fill, clay and bedrock to 8.7m Screened within fill only to 9m

TPH

BTEX

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T2 Services Zone groundwater.xlsm

18/11/2015Page 1 of 2

Page 52: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T2Groundwater Analytical Results

Stage 1B Stormwater Corridor AreaVMP/Block 4 RAP Addendum

Barangaroo South

Lend LeaseStage 1B Stormwater Corridor Area

Field_ID D01_120508 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 FILTRATE MW22 MW22 MW22 MW45Location_Code BH209 BH209 BH209 BH209 BH209 BH116 BH116 BH116 AECOM_BH45Well MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW209 MW22 MW22 MW22 MW45Sampled_Date_Time 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 16/03/2010 28/02/2011 28/02/2011 17/07/2006 7/05/2008 15/03/2010 19/03/2010Sample_Type Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalLab_Report_Number 37583 ES0806635 ES1004956 ES1104220 ES1104220 ES0608744 ES0806416 ES1004782 ES1005244

Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL MWQC Hydrid criteria, PDA HHERA (2012)

Screened within fill, sand and rock to

12.7m

Monitoring well screening details Screened within fill, clay and bedrock to 8.7m Screened within fill only to 9m

2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.2 - - - - 2,4,5-trichlorophenol µg/L 0.1 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.2 - <1 <2 <22,4,6-trichlorophenol µg/L 0.1 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.2 - <1 <2 <22,4-dichlorophenol µg/L 0.1 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.2 - <1 <2 <22,4-Dinitrotoluene µg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <42,6-dichlorophenol µg/L 0.1 - <1.8 <2 <1 <0.2 - <1 <2 <22,6-dinitrotoluene µg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <42-chlorophenol µg/L 0.05 <20 <1.8 <2 <1 <0.1 - <1 <2 <2Methyl Ethyl Ketone µg/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <502-hexanone (MBK) µg/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <502-nitroaniline µg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <42-Picoline µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <23,3-Dichlorobenzidine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <23-nitroaniline µg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <44-(dimethylamino) azobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-aminobiphenyl µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-bromophenyl phenyl ether µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-chloroaniline µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-chlorophenyl phenyl ether µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-nitroaniline µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <24-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <22-methyl-5-nitroaniline µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <27,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthraceneµg/L 0.1 - - <2 - <0.1 - - <2 <2Aniline µg/L 2 980,000 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Azobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Benzo(e)pyrene µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.1 - - - - Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate µg/L 20 - - 20 - - - - <20 <20Butyl benzyl phthalate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Carbazole µg/L 2 - - 4 - - - - <2 <2Chlorobenzilate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Coronene µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.1 - - - - Dibenzofuran µg/L 2 3.7 - - 3 - - - - <2 <2Diethylphthalate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Dimethyl phthalate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Di-n-butyl phthalate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Di-n-octyl phthalate µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Hexachlorocyclopentadiene µg/L 10 - - <10 - - - - <10 <10Hexachloroethane µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Hexachlorophene µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.2 - - - - Hexachloropropene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Methapyrilene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Nitrobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-Nitrosodiphenyl & Diphenylamineµg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <4N-nitrosodiethylamine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-nitrosodi-n-butylamine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-Nitrosomethylethylamine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-nitrosomorpholine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-nitrosopiperidine µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2N-nitrosopyrrolidine µg/L 4 - - <4 - - - - <4 <4Pentachlorobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Pentachloronitrobenzene µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Pentachlorophenol µg/L 0.05 22 <100 <3.7 <4 <2 <0.1 - <2 <4 <4Perylene µg/L 0.1 - - - - <0.1 - - - - Phenacetin µg/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <21,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1,1-trichloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1,2-trichloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1-dichloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1-dichloroethene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,1-dichloropropene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2,3-trichlorobenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2,3-trichloropropane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2,4-trichlorobenzene ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <21,2,4-trimethylbenzene ug/L 5 - - 36 - - - - <5 <51,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2-dibromoethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2-dichlorobenzene ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <21,2-dichloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,2-dichloropropane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,3,5-trimethylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,3-dichlorobenzene ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <21,3-dichloropropane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <51,4-dichlorobenzene ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <22,2-dichloropropane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <52-chlorotoluene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <54-chlorotoluene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <54-Methyl-2-pentanone ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Bromobenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Bromodichloromethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Bromoform ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Bromomethane ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Carbon disulfide ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Chlorobenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Chlorodibromomethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Chloroethane ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Chloroform ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Chloromethane ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50cis-1,3-dichloropropene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Dibromomethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Iodomethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Isophorone ug/L 2 - - <2 - - - - <2 <2Isopropylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5n-butylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5n-propylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Pentachloroethane ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5p-isopropyltoluene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5sec-butylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Styrene ug/L 5 72 88,000 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5tert-butylbenzene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5trans-1,2-dichloroethene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5trans-1,3-dichloropropene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/L 5 - - <20 - - - - <5 <5Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50Vinyl acetate ug/L 50 - - <200 - - - - <50 <50

VOCs

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T2 Services Zone groundwater.xlsm

18/11/2015Page 2 of 2

Page 53: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T3 - Comparison of Study Area contaminant mass to Zone 3 & 4 (Fill Material only)RAP Addendum - Stage 1B Public Domain (Watermans Quay)Lend lease

Site Area COPCAve. concentration (mg/kg)

Estimated volume (m3)

Weight (T) Weight (kg) Total contaminant mass (mg/kg)

Total contaminant mass (kg)

% of total contaminant mass in Zone 3, 4 and the Study Area's fill material

Naphthalene 5.5 53,920 107,840 107,840,000 593,120,000 593.1 13.9%TPH C10 - C14 61 53,920 107,840 107,840,000 6,578,240,000 6,578.2 22.9%

Naphthalene 41 8,800 17,600 17,600,000 721,600,000 721.6 16.9%TPH C10 - C14 38 8,800 17,600 17,600,000 668,800,000 668.8 2.3%

Naphthalene 1.2 309,920 619,840 619,840,000 743,808,000 743.8 17.4%TPH C10 - C14 30 309,920 619,840 619,840,000 18,595,200,000 18,595.2 64.7%

Naphthalene 22 50,400 100,800 100,800,000 2,217,600,000 2,217.6 51.8%TPH C10 - C14 25 50,400 100,800 100,800,000 2,520,000,000 2,520.0 8.8%

Sub-total Naphthalene 4,276.1 Sub-total TPH C10 - C14 28,362.2

Naphthalene 0.25 6,200 12,400 12,400,000 3,100,000 3.1 0.07%TPH C10 - C14 29 6,200 12,400 12,400,000 359,600,000 359.6 1.3%

Naphthalene 4,279.2 TPH C10 - C14 28,721.8

Notes: The Zone 3 and 4 volume and contaminant mass calculations are taken from the VMP Remediation Extent report (AECOM, 2013b)

Sum of Zone 2, 3 and the Study Area Sum of Zone 2, 3 and the Study Area

The Study Area (including upper and lower fill materials)

Zone 3 - Off Site upper fill within 20m of Declaration Area

Zone 3 - Off Site lower fill within 20m of Declaration Area

Zone 4 - Off Site upper fill outside 20m of Declaration Area

Zone 4 - Off Site lower fill outside 20m of Declaration Area

Page 54: Lend Lease Development Plans

20 of 22

Attachment 4: Lendlease Development Plans

Page 55: Lend Lease Development Plans

Drawing:

Date: Revision:

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A000STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

TITLE SHEET

ONE SYDNEY HARBOURBARANGAROO SOUTH

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSBB2 _PA2_A000 TITLE SHEETBB2 _PA2_A001 AERIAL LOCATION PLANBB2 _PA2_A002 SURVEY PLANBB2 _PA2_A003 DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION & SERVICES ZONE PLANBB2 _PA2_A100 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B0BB2 _PA2_A101 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B1BB2 _PA2_A102 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B2BB2 _PA2_A103 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B3BB2 _PA2_A104 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B4BB2 _PA2_A105 BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B5BB2 _PA2_A300 SECTION 01BB2 _PA2_A301 SECTION 02BB2 _PA2_A302 SECTION 03BB2 _PA2_A303 SECTION 04BB2 _PA2_A400 BUILDING ELEMENTS - GROUND FLOORBB2 _PA2_A401 BUILDING ELEMENTS - PODIUM P1BB2 _PA2_A402 BUILDING ELEMENTS - PODIUM P2BB2 _PA2_A501 BUILDING ELEMENTS - ELEVATIONS

Stage 1B Basement SSD6960Development Application

Page 56: Lend Lease Development Plans

NSW ARB 9512

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated Architect

Lend Lease Design

NSW ARB 6480

Stephanie Smith | Nominated Architect

Millers Point, NSW, 2000

30 The Bond, 30 Hickson Road,

ABN 97 000 098 162

11:17:51 AM19/05/2016pxv01$FILE$ LLdesign

0 50M50M0

Scale 1:2000 @ A3Scale 1:1000 @ A1

Date: Revision:

Drawing:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - ItalyRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP

RPBWPRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT: Checked:

19.05.2016

Milan Busina

Approved:

19.05.2016

Stephanie Smith

BB2_PA2_A001STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

AERIAL LOCATION PLANB

SITE BOUNDARYBARANGAROO SOUTH

BOUNDARYCONSTRUCTION SITE

INFRASTRUCTURE ZONEINDICATIVE SERVICES AND

CENTRAL BARANGAROO STAGE 1A

BASEMENTEXTENT OF

INFRASTRUCTURESERVICES AND INTERIM PUBLIC DOMAIN,

19 May 2016

Page 57: Lend Lease Development Plans

NSW ARB 9512

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated Architect

Lend Lease Design

NSW ARB 6480

Stephanie Smith | Nominated Architect

Millers Point, NSW, 2000

30 The Bond, 30 Hickson Road,

ABN 97 000 098 162

11:19:53 AM19/05/2016pxv01$FILE$ LLdesign

Date: Revision:

Drawing:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - ItalyRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP

RPBWPRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT: Checked:

19.05.2016

Milan Busina

Approved:

19.05.2016

Stephanie Smith

REV. DATE AMENDMENTS

0

REFERENCE No. PLAN No. DATE SHEET No.

CLIENT

LOCALITY

SURVEYOR DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED

OF SHEETS

L.G.A.

NOTES:

1

1

REDUCTION RATIO @ A1

CONTOUR INTERVAL :

ORIGIN OF LEVELS :

DATUM :

THIS TITLE BLOCK AND NOTES FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE PLAN

AND MUST BE REPRODUCED IN ANY USE, DUPLICATION OR AMENDMENT.

SUBDIVISION | STRATA PLANS | STRATUM SUBDIVISION | LEASE PLANS | TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS | GPS

SURVEYS | 3D MODELLING | RACECOURSE DESIGN | PROJECT MANAGEMENT | SUN SHADOW DIAGRAMS

SURVEYING SINCE 1893

ABN 61 001 204 897

Rygate & Company Pty Limited

P.W. Rygate & West

S U R V E Y O R S

Suite 904 Level 9, 89 York St

Sydney NSW 2000

+61 2 9262 6800

+61 2 9262 6843

[email protected]

rygate.com.au

a

p

f

e

w

PLANNO PART OF THIS PLAN MAY BE REPRODUCED,

COMMUNICATED, STORED IN A RETRIEVAL SYSTEM OR

TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN

PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER EXCEPT AS

PERMITTED BY THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1968. ANY PERMITTED

DOWNLOADING, ELECTRONIC STORAGE, DISPLAY, PRINT,

COPY, REPRODUCTION OR COMMUNICATION OF THIS SURVEY

SHOULD CONTAIN NO ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE

ORIGINAL SURVEY.

60

600

Darling Harbour

S.S.M. 46693

R.L. 2.454 A.H.D.

AUSTRALIAN HEIGHT DATUM BARANGAROO

CITY OF SYDNEY

LEND LEASE

76691 16/12/14

SHOWING DETAIL & LEVELS

HICKSON ROAD

BARANGAROO

AC & SG SK, GD & TM TM TM

NOTES:

AREAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND BEING USED

FOR CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURES ARE INDICATIVE

ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN CHECKED FOR CURRENCY

SERVICES MAY NOT BE CURRENT AND IT IS THE

RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL CONTRACTORS AND

CONSULTANTS TO CONFIRM CURRENT SERVICES

ONSITE AND BY DIAL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG SERVICES SEARCH

PRELIMINARY

2.7

3

2.5

6

2.7

32.7

3

2.2

7

2.5

5

2.5

6

2.5

9

2.5

9

2.5

8

2.5

7

2.7

5

2.6

2

2.6

2

2.6

0

2.6

3

2.6

22.6

7

2.7

0

2.6

4

2.5

0

2.5

1

2.6

7

2.6

02.6

1

2.6

5

2.6

2

3.4

8

2.1

5

2.1

4

2.1

3

2.2

4

1.7

3

2.2

5

2.4

4

2.3

6

2.5

1

2.6

1

2.6

1

2.6

7

2.5

5

2.4

6

2.4

5

2.6

2

2.8

1

2.9

3

2.5

6

3.4

2

3.6

4

3.5

0

3.2

1

3.2

3

3.1

9

3.1

43.0

1

3.2

0

3.2

63.4

3

3.6

2

3.7

0

3.5

6

3.6

5

3.7

8

3.8

8

3.7

4

3.8

2

3.9

74.0

0

3.9

9

3.9

5

3.8

8

3.8

6

3.8

3

3.7

0

3.8

3

3.7

4

3.6

13.6

8

3.5

5

3.7

4

3.5

93.5

8

3.5

7

3.4

5

3.4

2

3.4

6

3.4

5

3.4

5

3.5

2

3.5

3

3.5

2

3.5

2

3.5

0

3.4

83.4

7

3.4

7 3.4

8

3.4

8

3.4

9

3.5

2

3.4

0

3.3

9

3.4

0

3.4

0

3.3

7

3.3

6

3.3

2

3.3

2 3.3

2

3.3

3 3.3

4

3.3

5

3.3

8

3.1

33.2

1

3.1

0 2.8

6

2.7

8

2.9

4

2.7

2

2.7

32.7

4

2.7

8

3.9

5

2.1

7

2.1

6

2.1

7

2.8

1

3.2

5

3.3

4

3.4

5

3.3

6 2.6

4

2.6

0

2.6

0

2.5

5

2.5

0

2.8

3

2.5

6

2.9

6

3.0

0

3.0

8

3.1

1 3.2

1

3.2

0

3.2

7

3.3

9

3.2

6

2.5

7

3.1

0

2.5

9

3.4

9

2.9

5

2.9

42.8

5

2.9

0 2.7

7

2.7

02.8

1

2.8

3

2.6

7

2.8

1

2.7

92.6

2

2.6

12.7

5

2.7

6

2.6

4

2.6

82.8

0

2.8

92.7

7

2.7

9

2.9

2

3.0

5

3.0

4

3.0

53.0

4

3.0

4

3.0

2

3.0

1

2.9

22.9

1

2.9

0

2.8

8

2.8

7

3.0

7

3.1

1

2.9

8

2.9

8

3.1

1

3.0

92.9

6

2.9

4

3.0

7 3.0

9

2.9

12.8

0

2.8

8

2.7

5

2.7

82.6

5

2.7

72.6

1

2.6

8

2.8

22.8

22.9

3

2.9

62.7

3

2.7

32.8

9

2.6

7

2.7

8

3.4

9

2.8

3

2.6

9

2.6

7

2.6

92.5

82.5

4

2.5

42.6

02.7

0

2.8

6

2.7

92.7

5

2.7

5

2.8

5

2.7

92.7

4

2.7

2

2.4

7

2.6

0

2.5

7

2.5

7

2.6

42.4

8

2.6

9

2.6

92.7

2

2.7

9

2.6

0

2.6

7

2.6

9

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

PAINTED

ROAD MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

PAINTED

ROAD MARKING

PAINTED

ROAD MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKINGLANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

PAINTED

ROAD MARKINGPAINTED

ROAD MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKINGLANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LANE MARKING

LA

NE

MA

RKIN

G

D.P. 813557

1

D.P. 431471

3

D.P. 873158

M.H.W.M. (VIDE D.P.876514)

D.P. 873158

2

D.P. 873158

1

3

D.P.876514

5

D.P.876514

6

D.P.876514

PM 177

E 333 804.7

02

N 6251 392.4

04

E 333550

N 6251350

E 333600

N 6251350

E 333800

N 6251350

E 333850

N 6251350

E 333550

N 6251400

E 333600

N 6251400

E 333800

N 6251400

E 333550

N 6251450

E 333600

N 6251450

E 333800

N 6251450

E 333550

N 6251500

E 333600

N 6251500

E 333800

N 6251500

E 333550

N 6251550

E 333600

N 6251550

E 333650

N 6251550

E 333700

N 6251550

E 333750

N 6251550

E 333800

N 6251550

E 333550

N 6251600

E 333600

N 6251600

E 333650

N 6251600

E 333700

N 6251600

E 333750

N 6251600

E 333800

N 6251600

E 333550

N 6251650

E 333600

N 6251650

E 333650

N 6251650

E 333700

N 6251650

E 333750

N 6251650

E 333800

N 6251650

E 333550

N 6251700

E 333600

N 6251700

E 333650

N 6251700

E 333700

N 6251700

E 333750

N 6251700

E 333800

N 6251700

E 333550

N 6251750

E 333600

N 6251750

E 333650

N 6251750

E 333700

N 6251750

E 333750

N 6251750

E 333800

N 6251750

E 333750

N 6251800

SSM 7

5636

SSM 1

7563

7

19.4

6

2.2

8

2.1

8

2.7

7

2.3

7

2.0

6

2.1

9

22.9

9

20.5

319.7

8

19.5

8

19.5

4

19.4

6

2.51

2.6

4

5.8

8

5.3

3

2.53

2.5

3

2.52

2.5

2

2.5

6

19.2

9

19.6

820.4

9

2.8

4

2.6

8

2.7

2

2.3

5

19.4

3

19.3

9

2.7

9

2.7

1

2.5

6

2.58

8.7

210.8

7

11.8

8

12.4

0

18.14

13.51

14.25

15.06

15.93

16.84

17.04

17.05

16.06

16.21

16.44

16.56

16.72

16.82

17.01

17.34

17.45

18.59

17.55

16.45

13.40

13.05

12.74

11.90

12.49

13.2313

.78

14.49

15.19

16.2517

.26

16.25

16.29

16.53

16.62

16.78

16.93

17.11

17.44

17.56

17.63

18.62

19.09

16.48

17.39

12.07

12.06

12.10

12.11

11.98

17.18

16.15

15.45

14.46

13.78

13.20

13.18

13.42

13.42

15.00

15.10

15.38

13.76

13.65

14.40

15.23

16.0316

.37

18.48

17.62

17.58 17

.51

17.04

16.84

16.72

16.58

16.22 1

6.08

17.73

17.65

17.54

17.22

17.0

2

16.94

16.80

16.67

16.47 1

6.35

16.35

18.31

18.39

18.65

16.32

16.47

16.49

16.77

17.39

17.48

18.22

18.52

18.79

13.94

17.82

14.74

13.29

15.38

16.18

16.20

16.56

16.90

17.54

16.95

17.00

16.44

2.75

2.75

2.71

2.74

2.68

2.65

2.61

2.57

2.48

2.43

2.41

2.70

2.98

2.57

2.53

2.69

2.68

2.672.

67

2.64

2.63 2.

65

2.66 2.

67

2.65

2.65

2.56

2.65 2.

65

2.63

2.64

2.60

2.65

2.63

2.78

2.86

2.94

3.00

3.04

2.54

2.41

JENKINS STREET

2.52

16.52

20.57

17.99

17.97

19.0916

.13

16.19

16.21

17.32

17.41

17.43

17.85

17.62

17.5617

.6718

.05

TOP OF CONC. KERB 150mm HIGH

OF

CO

NC.

KE

RB

STEEL

MESH

FENCE

OLD STONE WALL

VEHICLE CROSSING VEHICLE CROSSING

VEHICLE CROSSINGVEHICLE CROSSING

FLOOR

LEVE

L

17.735

2.49

2.50

2.49

11.2

0

21.1

219.6

3

19.6

1

19.5

4

19.3

9

19.5

6

19.4

5

20.0

719.8

3

19.8

0

20.0

019.7

8

19.9920.07

20.3

5

20.0

2

20.03

20.82

20.76

20.4

5

19.8

8 20.0

0

20.0

3

20.5

0

20.0

219.6

9

21.2

4

20.3

0

21.9

021.9

7

22.0

2

22.1

9

20.1

0

19.3

2

19.5

3

19.8

2

15.3

7

15.3

7

11.1

6

19.3

9

19.48

19.4

9

19.5

3

19.5

3

19.6

019.5

819.6

6

20.25

20.15

20.1

6

11.1

7

19.62

2.7

5

19.6

4

19.9

1

19.9

9

20.0

7

20.1

0

11.1

6

11.1

6

21.8

9

20.6

120.6

620.4

4

19.0

5

19.9

1

19.9

26.08

gutter

16.8

5

16.49

17.0

1

17.07

17.2

7

17.5

8

17.6

6

17.7

4

stepsSTEPS

steps

BITUMEN

OLD CHIMNEY

FENCE

LANDING

24.8

6 gutter

28.7

0 ridge

29.0

8 para

pet

22.8

5 balc

ony

RET

WALL

RET.

WALL

CO

NC

RETE

GR

AS

S

NIG

HTS

OIL LAN

E

7.07

16.72

5.41

5.054.

68

4.39

4.07

3.70

3.58

3.51

3.49

3.31

3.15

2.99

2.74

3.44

3.74

OF

KERB

VE

HIC

LE

CR

OSSIN

G

7.4

6

8.0

4

10.1

7

10.6

9

11.9

5

12.9

0

12.0

8

10.8

1

12.4

0

11.8

7

10.4

0

9.5

4

13.34

13.35

10.4

6

9.6

8

8.1

7

10.3

2

7.5

4

7.1

4

11.3

9

11.3

5

11.5

2

12.7

7

10.1

8

10.1

8

5.0

9

4.6

2

4.2

34.2

9

3.9

54.0

7

4.0

43.8

53.8

3

3.4

9

3.2

2

2.7

9

6.3

0

9.5

7

9.4

6

8.7

0

9.2

7

8.6

9

8.3

4

8.2

1

11.6

8

12.0

5

12.7

0

12.6

4

12.5

8

20.7

6

20.7

7

20.6

9

20.7

0

12.2

2

9.6

1

11.3

7

ROAD

HIG

H

ST

RE

ET

SUSSEX STREET

OF

No.32 STOREY BRICK

TERRACE

OF

VEHICLE CROSSING

TOP

OF

KER

B

19.4

6

2.0

3

2.0

4

2.0

5

1.9

9

1.9

8

1.9

5

2.3

9

2.3

6

2.3

6

2.2

1

2.2

0

2.3

7

2.4

0

2.4

9

2.3

2

2.3

3

2.5

9

2.5

5

2.6

1

2.47

2.6

2

2.5

4

2.5

2

2.4

9

2.67

2.6

9

2.562.8

3

2.6

7

2.5

32.5

2

2.56

2.6

3

2.6

1

2.5

4

2.89 2

.35

3.3

5

3.4

93.4

2

3.3

93.4

6

2.5

2

2.4

1

2.4

2

2.53

2.5

5

2.4

9

2.52

2.482.48

2.48

2.49

2.5

1

2.5

22.5

2

2.5

22.5

1

2.4

9

2.6

0

2.6

42.6

3

2.6

2

2.4

6

2.4

6

2.3

9

2.3

92.3

8

2.3

8

2.5

1

2.4

4

2.4

0

2.4

1

2.9

3

2.65

2.5

9

2.47

2.6

0

3.4

5

3.4

73.4

7

2.7

6

2.7

3

2.6

7

2.6

0

2.6

5

2.5

8

2.6

0

2.4

1

2.5

3

19.9

020.7

522.5

422.3

8

TREE TREE0.45D 10H 10S TREE

0.55D 10H 10STREE

0.4D 10H 8S

TREE0.45D 10H 10S

TREE0.4D 8H 8S

TR

EE

0.3

5D 8

H 8

S

TR

EE

0.4

D 10

H 10S

TR

EE

0.7

D 15

H 16

S

TR

EE

0.8

D 15

H 20

S

2.1

9

2.2

1

2.2

3

2.5

6

2.5

8

2.3

9

2.4

1

2.4

1

2.4

2

1.0

3

2.4

9

2.2

12.2

1

2.1

9

2.2

7

2.2

7

2.3

52.3

5

2.3

0

2.3

0

2.3

0

2.3

0

2.1

0

2.3

3

2.3

3

2.3

3

2.4

1

2.4

0

2.2

2

2.2

3

2.1

6

2.1

7

2.1

6

2.4

2

2.4

2

2.3

2

2.3

3

2.5

4

2.2

9 2.2

9

2.2

8 2.2

7

2.5

7

2.5

42.6

0

2.6

1

2.3

7

2.1

6

2.1

42.1

4

2.1

4

2.1

1

2.1

1

2.2

42.2

4

2.3

8

2.3

0

2.3

8

2.3

62.3

42.3

4

2.05

2.35

2.3

3

2.3

42.3

2

2.3

0

2.2

9

2.2

8

2.3

2

2.3

3

2.3

7

2.3

7

2.4

12.3

9

2.3

8

2.3

7

2.32 2.

31

2.3

32.3

3

2.2

7

2.2

42.2

4

2.2

3

2.2

4

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.5

0

2.4

6

2.4

4

2.4

5

2.4

5

2.3

3

2.3

8

2.4

2

2.3

2

2.3

2

2.4

4

2.4

4

2.05

2.3

3

2.04

2.2

9

2.3

3

2.3

42.3

5

2.3

6

2.3

0

2.3

0

2.3

5

2.3

3

2.4

8

2.5

3

2.5

52.5

5

2.4

7

2.4

5

2.4

0

2.0

8

2.0

6

2.0

9

2.0

6

2.0

6

2.0

5

2.0

4

2.0

5

2.0

7

2.0

5

2.0

5

2.0

1

2.0

32.4

82.6

7

2.6

92.7

4

2.7

3

2.6

0

2.5

2

2.1

32.1

4

2.5

2

2.7

1

2.3

02.2

6

2.6

8

2.1

6

2.1

5

2.1

92.1

6

2.1

6

2.1

7

2.1

6

2.1

4

1.5

1

1.4

91.3

5

1.3

7

1.3

60.8

3

2.3

4

2.2

8

2.3

4

2.3

2

2.3

2

2.3

2

2.3

2

2.3

5

2.2

4

2.5

12.3

52.6

0

2.5

9

2.2

4

2.4

7 2.5

7

2.5

7

2.5

7

2.5

5

2.5

6

2.5

6

2.5

4

2.4

4

2.3

4

2.3

5

2.3

2

2.3

1

2.3

6

2.3

7

2.1

1

2.1

6

2.1

5

2.2

3

2.1

1

2.2

2

2.2

6

2.1

2

2.2

6

2.3

2

2.3

0

2.3

0

2.3

1

2.3

32.2

9

2.1

7

2.0

4

2.1

4

2.3

9

2.2

0

2.1

6

2.2

0

2.3

0

2.3

5

2.1

3

2.1

4

2.1

6

2.1

4

2.1

2

2.1

2

2.1

5

2.1

42.2

6

2.2

62.1

6

2.1

7

2.1

8

2.2

2

2.2

1

2.3

8

2.3

9

2.4

0

2.3

7

2.3

9

2.3

8

2.4

9

2.5

2

1.3

6

1.3

6

2.2

92.3

3

2.3

42.3

0

2.5

1

2.4

6

2.5

1

2.5

2

2.4

8

2.4

8

2.3

2

2.3

5

2.3

8

2.3

9

2.5

3

2.4

9

2.4

9

2.4

6

2.3

8

2.4

1

2.3

9

2.1

9

2.2

6

2.2

9

2.2

3

2.3

1

2.3

8

2.3

0 2.3

2

2.4

7

2.4

72.4

9

2.4

8

2.2

52.4

6

2.4

62.2

9

2.2

52.4

8

2.4

82.2

4

2.9

4

2.9

5

2.8

3

2.6

1

2.2

4

2.2

6

2.3

62.4

42.3

32.3

92.3

72.3

6

2.3

52.3

5

2.3

22.2

62.3

52.4

02.4

02.4

22.4

3

2.4

4

2.2

1

2.37

2.2

52.2

22.2

02.2

2

2.2

5

2.2

92.2

72.1

9

2.1

72.2

8

2.3

42.3

3

2.2

32.2

0

2.3

3

2.3

52.2

02.1

3

2.4

2

2.4

3

2.4

4

2.4

4

2.4

32.5

7

2.6

3

2.6

1

2.5

9

2.5

0

2.4

5

2.5

3

2.5

3 2.4

52.2

2

2.1

6

2.3

2

2.1

3

2.5

5

2.0

8

2.1

3

2.1

8

2.1

8

2.1

8

2.1

7

2.1

9

2.1

9

2.0

22.0

1

2.2

2

2.2

3

2.2

4

2.1

8

2.1

9

2.1

8

2.1

7

2.1

7

2.1

6

2.1

4

2.1

5

2.1

8

2.1

8

2.1

5

2.1

4

13.6

2

14.4

2

2.1

8

2.1

72.1

9

2.1

8

2.2

9

2.5

5

2.5

5

2.0

32.0

4

2.0

4

2.0

32.0

3

2.07

2.09

2.4

8

2.5

0

2.3

12.3

3

2.3

22.3

3

2.05

2.05

2.02

2.03

2.2

8

2.3

02.2

9

2.3

12.3

1

2.3

3

2.6

2

2.4

8

2.3

52.4

6

2.3

6

2.3

6

2.3

4

2.3

3

2.3

5

2.3

3

2.3

8

2.5

1

2.4

5

2.4

6

2.4

8

2.4

9

2.4

8

2.3

6

2.4

0

2.5

1

2.4

42.4

2

2.4

2

2.2

9

2.3

9

2.4

3

2.29

2.3

2

2.4

5

2.5

6 2.4

8

ROOF RIDGE R.L.24.7ROOF RIDGE R.L.24.7

RO

OF

RID

GE

R.L.2

3.1

2

RO

OF

RID

GE

R.L.2

3.7

4

7.65 R

OOF

R.L.3

8.4

5

LEVEL 8 PARAPET R.L.34.63

RO

OF

R.L.3

4.6

2

19.4

6

2.2

8

2.1

8

2.7

7

2.3

7

2.0

6

2.1

9

19.5

9

20.8

8

21.3

0

20.0

8

19.6

519.5

619.5

419.5

4

19.4

2

19.6

019.6

920.5

721.6

8

20.6

521.6

5

2.5

2

19.4

6

2.2

8

2.1

8

2.7

7

2.3

7

2.0

6

2.1

9

2.5

1

2.4

8

2.4

9

2.4

5

2.5

2

19.4

6

2.2

8

2.1

8

2.7

7

2.3

7

2.0

6

2.1

9

19.4

0

19.0

7

19.1

0

2.4

6

2.26

3.11 3

.97

3.82

3.87

3.82

4.09 4.25

4.22

4.06 4

.14 4

.35

5.36

5.48

5.44

5.44

5.53

8.85

8.83

8.87

8.88

9.38

9.26

9.64

9.57

12.44

11.16

9.95

9.429.36

9.12

9.10

9.12

PIT9.23

9.16

PIT 9.46

9.28

9.37

9.40

9.39

9.42

9.46

9.45

9.62 9

.78

9.81

10.02

10.16

10.12

9.74

WATER

9.99 GAS1

0.0

3

26.02

6.58

7.93

7.98

SV3.95

HYD

3.85

38.4735.45

2.44

2.43 2.45

2.53

2.53

2.55

2.54

2.58

2.57

2.58

2.59

2.60

2.59

2.55

2.62

2.73

2.77

HYD

18.88

20.48

20.5

0

22.66

21.93

21.92

16.58

16.54

ELEC

LIGHT POLE 2.67

LIGHT

POLE

2.57

2.65

2.70

3.412.61

2.73

2.72

2.73

3.35

3.36

3.39

3.52

3.59

3.84

3.82

3.44

3.35

2.69

2.70

3.08

3.42

3.6

7

3.35

3.34

3.25

3.28

3.50

3.55

3.55

3.56

3.55

3.48

3.51

3.52

3.84

3.85

2.632

.63

2.61

3.5

2

3.53

3.303

.30

2.70

2.71

2.71

3.46

3.46

3.45

3.45

3.45

2.51

2.48

ELEC

LIGHT POLE2.52

2.53

2.55

2.55

2.55

3.74

PIT

3.48

3.4

9

3.50

2.62

2.97

3.50

3.50

3.4

6

3.44

35.48

16.58

2.83

2.81

2.80

2.61

2.82

2.89

2.89

3.05

3.14

3.05 3

.13

3.14

3.33 3

.38

3.36

3.30

3.29

3.27

3.23

3.16

TELSTRA3.10

3.09

3.06

3.07

3.05

3.00

2.77

2.76

2.54

2.52

2.37

2.37

3.26

3.29

3.30

3.24

3.243.223

.20

3.16

3.04

2.99

3.14

3.15

3.07

3.10

3.09

3.073

.05

3.19

3.21

3.22

3.22

3.21

2.94

2.90

3.04

3.07

3.08

3.09

3.06

3.34

3.323.333.27

3.26

3.28

3.13

3.13

3.12 3

.17

3.19

3.19

3.24

3.27

3.15

3.08

3.13

3.16

3.21

3.20

3.163.01

3.06

3.07

3.03

2.99

2.94

3.42

3.77

3.73

3.70

3.7

2

3.75

3.62

3.60

3.62

3.65

3.47

3.52

3.50

3.45

3.48

3.273.29

3.2

9

3.40

3.36

3.343

.34

3.20

3.25

3.19

3.15

3.19

3.14

3.24

3.17

3.11

2.972.94

3.05

3.093

.08

3.04

3.00

2.96 3.01

3.10

3.08

3.08

3.11

3.10

3.11

3.13

3.11

3.14 3.15

3.14

3.12

3.11

3.12

3.123

.10

2.86

2.82

2.85

2.88

2.902

.802

.77

2.72

2.71

2.70

2.71

2.75

2.73

2.65

2.67

2.63

2.61

2.56

8.79

9.13

4.195.42

3.42

2.90

2.93

9.07

7.10

4.1

3

3.01

2.802.79

2.76

2.69

2.652

.70

3.09

2.90

2.93

2.87 2

.84

2.77

2.82

2.82

2.83

2.67

2.71

2.68

2.67 2

.65

2.63

2.70

2.78

2.72

2.67

2.34

2.36

2.34

2.35

2.34

2.37

2.36

2.25

2.26

2.19

2.43

2.46

2.38

2.45

2.48 2.48

2.46

2.45

2.53 2.47

2.40

2.30

2.28

2.43 2

.40

2.40

2.63

PIT

2.66

2.66 2

.67

2.68

PIT

2.21

2.23

2.19

2.47

2.58

2.59

PIT

2.55

2.56

PIT

2.60

2.60

2.53

2.53

2.84

2.69

PIT

PIT

26.14

26.50

26.81

TREE

0.6D 10H 14S

TREE0.1D 6H 2S

TREE

TREE0.5D 12H 8STREE

0.5D 15H 12STREE

0.5D 12H 8S

TREE

0.5D 12H 8S

TREE

0.3D 10H 8S

TREE

1.5D 20H 30S

18.85 GUTTER

18.85 GUTTER

DOOR

3.57 F.L.

DOOR

3.57 F.L.20.65 GUTTER

12.53 GUTTER

DO

OR

3.5

3 F.L.

DO

OR

3.5

3 F.L.

DO

OR

3.5

3 F.L.

DO

OR

3.5

3 F.L.

DOOR

3.53 F.L.

DO

OR

3.5

4 F.L. D

OO

R

3.5

4 F.L.

DO

OR

3.5

4 F.L.

DOOR

2.60 F.L.

DOOR

2.59 F.L.

DOOR

2.57 F.L.

DOOR

2.57 F.L.38.38 ROOF

DOOR

9.54 F.L

.

DOOR

9.93 F.L

.

DO

OR

9.9

4 F.L.

DO

OR

9.8

5 F.L.

DOOR

9.11 F.L

.

DOOR

3.30 F.L.

DOOR

3.36 F.L.

CO

NCRETE

TR

AFFIC

ISL

AN

D

COLUMN

STEP

STEP

GRATE

PLANTER

CO

NCRETE

KERB

BIT

UM

EN

BITUMEN

CONCRETE

RETAINING

WALL

CO

NC

RETE

BITUMENBITUMEN PATH

AWNING6.45 AWNING

METAL S

UPP

ORT

CONCRETE

AWNING

6.47 AWNING

PLANTER

CONCRETEBITUMEN

BITUMEN

PIT

TELSTRA

PIT

BRICK PAVED

CONC.

2.79

BITUMENCONC.

LOW CONCRETE WALL

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

BITUMEN

CONCRETE

5 STOREY BRICK

& SANDSTONE BUILDING

DO

OR

DO

OR

DO

OR

DO

OR

GAS METER ROOM

FIRE DOOR

SPRINKLER

BOOSTER CONNECTION

HYDRANT

BOOSTER CONNECTION

DO

OR

3.8

4 F.L.

CONCRETE

DRIVEWAY

BITUMEN

STONE RETAINING

WALL

PARKING

TICKET

MACHINE

PAR

KIN

G

METE

R

PARKING

METER

PARKING

METER

"THE SUSSEX"

4 & 5 STOREY BRICK

BUILDING

"THE GRAFTON BOND"

No.36

"THE BOND"

MULTI-STOREY RESIDENTIAL

BUILDING

No.3

0

"T

HE

BO

ND"

MU

LTI-

ST

OR

EY

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L

BUIL

DIN

G

BL

DG.

OV

ER

BITUMEN

2.4

9

2.16

2.2

8

2.3

6

2.3

9

2.6

3

2.4

7

2.5

5

2.6

1

2.5

2

2.5

9

2.5

92.5

8

2.5

72.5

8

8.3

0

5.3

3

2.8

7

2.7

0

2.7

6

2.5

6

2.7

1

2.6

7

2.6

7

2.5

9

4.9

1

5.7

9

7.2

3

8.1

7

2.6

6

2.4

8

2.41

2.7

4

2.6

7

2.8

9

2.4

1

2.8

8

3.6

5

6.5

4

8.7

2

8.1

8

7.4

5

6.3

3

5.67

5.6

8

6.8

6

8.2

2

9.1

3

10.1

1

10.8

7

11.8

8

12.4

0

18.14

12.52

12.98

13.51

14.25

15.06

15.93

16.84

17.70

17.04

17.05

16.06

16.21

18.59

2.52

12.94

13.27

17.55

16.45

13.40

13.05

12.74

11.90

12.49

13.2313

.78

14.49

15.19

16.2517

.26

17.64

16.25

16.29

18.62

19.09

2.61

16.4916

.44

16.21

16.30

16.49

17.18

17.59

17.45

12.58

12.21

13.30

12.98

13.11

12.83

12.78

12.78

12.84

12.85

12.84

12.76

12.70

12.27

12.20

12.82

12.94

12.94

13.06

12.33

12.88

12.77

12.78

12.84

12.84

12.83

12.76

12.69

12.47

12.24

12.07

12.06

12.10

12.11

11.98

17.18

16.15

15.45

14.46

13.78

13.20

13.18

13.42

13.42

15.00

15.10

15.38

13.76

13.01

13.65

14.40

15.23

16.0316

.37

16.83

17.80

18.14

18.48

16.22 1

6.08

16.47 1

6.35

16.35

18.31

18.39

18.65

16.32

18.22

18.52

18.79

7.01

13.94

13.18

16.38

14.74

13.29

13.74

15.38

16.18

16.20

17.22

17.16

17.82

STONE BUILDING

SANDSTONE BUILDING

2.58

2.54

2.59

2.59

2.55

2.58 2.

54 2.81

2.95

2.29

2.72 2.

71

2.43

2.46

2.98

2.65

2.63

2.78

2.86

2.94

3.04

2.56 2.

64

2.68

2.67 2.

68

2.62

2.75

2.76

2.76

2.79

2.80

2.78

2.91

2.94 2.

98

2.92

2.97

2.97

2.93

3.09

3.08

2.51

2.69

2.79

2.49

2.59 2.

622.48

2.54

2.63

2.67

2.42

2.77

2.79

2.83

2.97

2.41

2.41

2.53

HICKSON ROAD

JENKINS

STREET

20.57

17.99

17.97

19.0916

.13

16.19

16.21

17.32

17.41

17.43

17.85

17.62

17.5617

.6718

.05

TOP OF CONC. KERB 150mm HIGH

TOP

OF

CO

NC.

KE

RB

TOP OF KERB 150mm HIGH

STEEL

MESH

FENCE

STAIRS

STAIR

SSTAIR

S

2.5

2 2.40

2.4

4

16.38

16.49

2.42

2.82

3.30 3.

383.28

3.16

2.85

3.073

.093

.13

3.23

3.44

3.85

5.30

5.41

5.05

4.68

4.39

4.07

3.70

3.58

3.5

0

3.43

3.51

3.15

2.74

3.74

4.17

4.55

5.04

5.48

TOP

OF

KERB

LIP OF GUTTER

VE

HIC

LE

CR

OSSIN

G

PR

AM

CR

OSSIN

G

7.4

6

8.0

4

9.5

2

10.1

7

10.6

9

9.259.2

39.

24

10.24

11.5

8

12.6

0

11.9

5

10.6

9

12.9

0

12.0

8

10.8

1

9.0

0

6.8

4

12.4

0

11.8

7

10.4

0

9.5

4

13.34

13.35

10.4

6

9.6

8

8.1

7

10.3

2

7.5

4

7.1

4

11.3

9

11.3

5

11.5

2

12.7

7

10.1

8

10.1

8

10.1

8

5.0

9

4.6

2

4.2

3

4.2

9

3.9

54.0

7

4.0

43.8

53.8

3

3.5

8

3.4

9

3.3

7

3.3

0

3.22

3.3

6

2.7

9

2.7

8

2.7

9

2.7

2

2.6

8

2.6

8

2.6

6

2.6

9

2.6

6

2.7

4

6.3

0

2.7

6

2.7

7

2.7

8

9.5

7

9.4

6

8.7

0

9.2

7

8.6

9

8.3

4

8.2

1

11.6

8

12.0

5

12.7

0

12.6

4

12.5

8

9.6

1

11.3

7

NAPOLEON

ST

RE

ET

TOP OF

KERB

KERB

TOP

OF

VEHICLE CROSSING

TOP

OF

KER

B

TOPOF

KERB

STONE

PAVING

2.32

3.023.

012.3

8

2.3

1

2.3

2

2.0

8

3.1

2

2.5

5

2.64

2.4

8

2.6

2

2.5

9

3.4

9

3.17

2.9

8

3.50

3.0

3

3.3

8

2.44

2.632.65

2.68

2.6

3

2.6

3

2.4

1

2.8

3

3.19

2.9

5

3.19

2.3

6

2.3

1

2.3

5

2.86

3.3

5

3.4

93.4

2

3.3

93.4

6

3.0

4

2.9

1

3.2

0

2.7

0

2.6

42.6

3

2.6

2

2.23

2.4

4

2.4

3

2.4

5

2.30

3.09

3.09

3.03

2.9

72.4

42.4

5

2.4

5

2.4

5

2.4

3

2.4

3

2.3

9

2.4

52.4

5

3.3

1

3.2

8

3.0

6

3.3

4

3.4

9

3.1

9

3.1

2

2.9

3

3.00

3.3

33.3

3

3.35

3.2

7

3.45

3.47

3.47

3.1

2

3.40

2.9

6

3.1

7

3.0

7

3.0

3

3.1

3

3.3

3

3.5

0

3.09

2.7

7

3.0

9

3.4

2

2.3

7

3.2

0

3.2

4

3.3

1

3.3

6

2.90

TREE

0.5D 10H 10S

TREE

0.7D 15H 16S

TREE

0.5D 12H 12S

TREE TREE0.4D 12H 12S

TREE0.7D 12H 12S

TREE0.15D 5H 4S

TREETREE

0.6D 10H 12S

TREE0.3D 8H 6S

TREE

TREE

0.2D 6H 4S

TREE0.3D 8H 6S TREE

0.3D 8H 5S

TREE0.3D 8H 5S

TREE0.3D 8H 6S

TREE

0.2D 8H 6S

TREE0.3D 6H 6S

TREE0.6D 10H 10S

TREE

0.5D 10H 10S

TREE0.15D 4H 3S

2.6

0

2.6

22.7

5

2.3

4

2.49

2.3

3

2.0

9

2.30

2.65

2.6

7

2.7

4

2.7

1

2.5

7

2.5

42.6

0

2.6

1

2.6

5

2.6

4

2.5

1

2.4

9

2.8

6 2.67

2.3

7

2.1

8

2.2

0

2.2

9

2.5

6

2.6

0

2.6

0

2.00 2.00

2.0

5

2.2

6

2.2

1

2.2

0

2.4

1

2.3

0

2.4

1

2.4

8

2.6

1

2.4

4

2.4

3

2.3

5

2.7

3

2.5

8

2.19

2.19

2.492.53

2.77

2.5

2

2.9

8

2.70

2.4

3

2.5

1

2.5

2

2.4

3

2.4

4

2.3

9

2.2

6

2.1

5

2.4

1

2.6

3

2.4

4

2.7

1

2.5

9

2.6

9

2.8

5

2.56

2.54

2.6

1

2.6

0

2.6

3

TREE

0.6D 12H 14S

TREE

0.6D 12H 14S

TREE

0.4D 8H 8S

TREE

0.3D 6H 6S

TREE

0.5D 8H 8S

ROOF RIDGE R.L.24.7ROOF RIDGE R.L.24.7

RO

OF

RID

GE

R.L.2

3.1

2

RO

OF

RID

GE

R.L.2

3.7

4

3.36 3.36

3.1

4

2.4

9

2.76

TOP OF KERB

20.70 GUTTER20.76 GUTTER

9.4

6

SINGLE STOREY

CONCRETE

CONCRETE

CONCRETE

2.22

VEHICLE CROSSING

GA

RD

EN

2.4

8

PARAPET

19.55

ROOF 22.15

PAR

AP

ET

23.4

8

PARAPET

26.72PARAPET

25.56PARAPET

24.43PARAPET

23.30PARAPET

22.1322.35 PAR

APET

23.45 PAR

APET

22.35 PAR

APET

23.60 PAR

APET

23.60 PAR

APET

25.50 PAR

APET

22.80 PAR

APET

22.75 PAR

APET

23.60 PAR

APET

24.40 PAR

APET

25.45 PAR

APET

24.35 PAR

APET

23.55 PAR

APET

22.82 PAR

APET

22.75 PAR

APET

23.55 PAR

APET

25.45 PAR

APET

23.55 PAR

APET

98.45 TO

P OF

GLAS

S

98.45 TOP OF GLASS131.40 TOP OF GLASS

"AON"

MULTI STOREY

BUILDING

"SYMANTEC"

MULTI STOREY

BUILDING

102.43 ROOF

102.43 ROOF

20.18 PAR

APET

20.18 PAR

APET

20.70 PAR

APET

22.72 PAR

APET

22.72 PAR

APET

22.95 PAR

APET

22.7

2 P

AR

AP

ET

22.9

5 P

AR

AP

ET

22.7

2 P

AR

AP

ET

19.55 PAR

APET

DOOR

2.78 F.L.

TOP OF STONE

KERBTOP OF STONE KERB 0.15 HIGH

KERB

20.70 GUTTER

6.85 TOP OF SANDSTONE BASE

0.15 HIGH

3.15

2.56

2.77

3.48

16.42

16.41

13.82

11.72

9.59

7.50

5.45

6.23

4.00

3.94

3.87

MANHOLE

4.28

5.38

5.53

5.31

5.16

3.30

3.29

3.34

27.37

29.51

2.51

1.91

2.68

2.48

2.48

AWNING

6.02 AWNING

6.40 GUTTER

STREET

NAPOLEON

LIF

T

AW

NIN

G

167-197KENT ST.

BITUMEN FOOTPATH

2.4

8

2.52

3.40

2.47

2.59

2 STOREYBRICK BUILDING

5 STOREY

BALCONY

PUMPING STATION

SP1129

EMERGENCY

STORAGE TANK

(NOT SURVEYED)

EASEMENT FOR SEWAGE

PUMPING STATION

EA

SE

ME

NT

FO

R

DR

AIN

AG

E

1.2

2

WID

E

S S S S S SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

S

S S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

WW

WW

WW

WW

W

W

W WW

W W W W W

W

W

W

W

W

SS

SS

SS

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

S

S

S

S

S

S

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

SSW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SWSW

SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW

SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

T

T

T

T

T

EE

EE

E

E E E E E E E

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

E E E E E

E

EE

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E E E E E E E E EE

EEE E E E E E E E E E E E

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

EE

E E E

E E E E E E E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

E

E

E

EE E E E E E E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

G G G G G G G G GG G

GG

GG

GG

GG

G

G G G G G

GG

G

G

G

G

G

W W W W W W W WW

WW

WW

WW

W W W W W W W W W W

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W

W W W W W W

S

S

S

S

S

S

T TT T T T T

T T T T T T T T T T T TT

T

E

E

E

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W

SS

SS

S

G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GG

GG

G

G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

E

E

E

E

E E E E

E

E

E

E

E

S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

SW

SW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW SW

SW

SW

SW

SS

SS

S

W

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SWSWSWSWSWSWSWSW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW SW SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW SW SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

S

W W W W W W

WW

WW

W W W W W W W W

W W W W W W W WW W

W W W W W W W

W

T

T

T

T

TTTTTTTT

TT

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T T T T T T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

TT

TT

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T

TT

TT

TT

TT

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

T

TTTTTTTT

T T T T T T T T T

T

T

T

TT

TT

TT

T

T T T T T T T T T

T T T

TT

TT

TT

TT

TT

T

T

T T T T T

T T T T T T T

T

TT

T

T T T T T T T T T T T T T

T

TT

TT

TT

TT

E E E E EE

EE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

EE

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E E E E E E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

EE

E E

E

E

EE

E

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

E

E

E

E

E

G

G

G

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

GG

GG

GG

GG

GG

GG

G

GG

GG

GG

GG

GG

GG

TT

TT

T

APP

RO

X

LO

CATIO

N

OP

TUS

CAB

LES

T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T

PARKING

METER

KERBTOP OF KERBTOP OF CONC. KERB

VEHICLE CROSSINGVEHICLE CROSSINGVEHICLE

CROSSING

2.47

2.54

2.45

2.64

2.64

2.59

2.46

2.47

2.75 2.

82

2.84

2.91 2.

99

3.06

3.143.22 3.31

2.89

2.83

2.87

2.83

2.60

2.40

2.69

2.32

3.28

3.33

2.62 2.

352.39

2.36

2.40

2.402.41

2.37

2.39

2.39

2.40

2.372.34

2.26

2.51

3.03 3.

10

3.13

2.41

3.34

2.39

2.38

2.43

2.65

2.52

2.55

2.77

2.49

2.48

2.63

2.62

2.49 2.49 2.

50

2.35

2.35

2.46

2.4

5

2.51

3.38

3.28

3.21

3.12

3.08

2.762.

80

2.79

2.35

2.32

2.32

2.182.17

2.302.

38

3.09

3.2

1

2.51

2.50

3.21

3.30

3.38 3.

50SIGN

SIGN

SIGN

2.4

1

2.46

2.36

2.36

2.68

2.58

2.67

2.59

2.55

2.57

2.82

2.8

9

2.88

2.43

2.58

2.51

2.51

2.44

2.37 2.39

2.51

2.48

2.49

2.50

2.62

2.682.

15

2.49

2.47

2.45

2.672.73

2.45

2.37

2.42

2.40

2.39

2.39

2.34 2.33 2.

40

2.35

3.30

3.30

3.28

2.422.43

2.50

2.50 2.51

2.41

2.65

2.632.56

2.64

2.60

2.64 2.69

2.77

2.85 2.97 3.03

2.48

2.35

2.77

2.632.

692.69

2.67

2.76

2.89 2.

96

SIGN2.

54

SIG

N

2.5

0 SIGN2.39

3.26

3.17

3.11

3.012.952.88

2.78

2.82

2.502.

50

2.48

2.53

2.52

2.52

2.51

2.59

2.50

2.52

2.47 2.38

2.50

2.52

2.46

3.4

9

2.52

2.5

1

2.5

6 2.51 2.

52

3.3

43.203.14

2.65

2.5

2

2.63

2.63

2.59

2.59

2.56

2.59

2.602.

62

ELEC

LIG

HT P

OLE

2.46

2.91

2.20

3.28

2.42

2.452.51

2.84

3.4

3

2.90

2.94

2.93

2.90

2.40

3.38

3.263.18

3.113.04

2.952

.87

2.782.

71

2.69

2.60

2.62

2.63

2.57

2.54

2.39

2.49

2.75

2.46

2.58

2.642.67

2.63

2.40

2.41

2.55

2.48

2.51

2.57

2.59

2.53

2.47

2.43

2.432.41

2.44

2.64

2.37

2.39

2.56

2.75

2.64

SIGN2.

58

2.61

2.49

2.62

2.54

2.56 2.53

2.46

2.73

2.74

2.69

2.76

2.58

2.57 2.55

2.66

2.66

2.38

2.57 2.62

2.64

2.71

2.74

2.65

2.59

2.552.56

2.61

2.60

2.28

2.21

2.16

2.372.56

2.62

2.662.

722.722.

76

2.50

2.67

2.64

2.65

2.66

2.40

2.39

2.67

2.77

2.81

2.80

2.76

2.72

2.63

2.482.59

2.54

2.5

8

2.382.452.

48

2.69

2.70 2.

71

2.72

2.66

2.64

SIGN

SIGN

SIGN

SIGN2.

60

2.3

3

2.24

2.30

2.34

3.13

3.15

3.25

3.36

2.752.65

2.58 2.

52

2.63

2.63

2.37

2.372.352.

372.44

2.44

2.44

2.50

2.57

2.54

2.47

2.45

2.80

2.73

2.73

2.72

SIGN2.

50

2.51

SIGN2.

49

SIGN2.

67

2.37

2.50 2.

48

2.43

2.39 2.41

2.41

2.38

2.43

2.43 2.41

2.40

2.42

2.41 2.

43 2.51

2.55

2.55 2.

542.59 2.

55

2.58

2.64 2.66 2.

592.55

2.42

2.38 2.78

2.72

2.67

2.62

2.66

2.49

2.742.65

2.69

2.61

2.63 2.

652.61

2.48

2.51

2.61

2.58

2.60

2.44

2.43

2.42

2.36

2.362.

362.42

2.51

2.41

2.392.

42

2.32

2.40

2.50

2.48

2.68

2.55

2.65

2.73

2.78

2.93

3.02

3.08

3.43

2.552.50

2.54

2.43

2.55

2.39

2.35

2.17

2.24

2.48

2.74

2.65

2.43 2.

522.56 2.

58

2.42

2.36

2.37

2.42

3.2

2

3.183.05

2.922.

85

2.45

2.60

2.61

2.52

2.522.512.52

2.53

2.55

2.55

2.51

2.53 2.

59

2.56

2.41

2.38

2.54

2.57

2.3

1

3.03

2.95

2.87

2.80

2.77

2.72

2.76

2.74

2.63

2.61

2.62

2.62

2.63

3.113.03

2.98

2.92

2.88

2.66

2.73

2.83

2.90 2.97 3.043.11

3.23

2.69

2.69

3.48

3.54

3.57

3.30

3.41

2.63

2.72

2.58

2.52

2.67

2.54

2.50

2.52

2.52

2.54

2.35

2.403.08

2.972.

912.852.80

2.85

2.892.63

2.65

2.65

2.65

2.60

2.56

2.69

2.65

2.66

2.67

2.67

2.66

2.67

2.64

2.66

2.672.

66

2.64

2.62

2.612.

65

2.71 2.

842.78

2.71

2.60

2.57

2.53

3.1

1

2.55

2.40

TREE

0.5D 4S 6H

TREE

0.5D 4S 6H

TREE

0.5D 4S 6H

TREE

0.2D 8S 6H

TREE

0.2D 6S 6H

TREE

0.2D 4S 6HTREE

0.2D 8S 6H

TEL.

3.00

3.00

GARDEN

CONC.

CONC.

PARKING

MET

ER

VEHICLE CROSSING VEHICLE CROSSING

VEHICLE CROSSING

PAR

KIN

GM

ETER

VEHICLE

CROSSING

PARKING

MET

ER

MESH FENCE

LOW CONC HOB

"GATE 6"

ROADHICKSON

CONC FOOTPATH

0.4D 8H 8S

EE

EE

EE

S

IGN

SIGN

S

IGN

S

IGN

WW

WW

0.2D 7H 5S

S

IG

N

SIGN

SIG

N

SIG

N

0.3D 12H 6S

S

IG

N

PAR

KIN

G

METE

RG G G G G G G G

E E E E E E E E E

SIG

N

S

IG

N

0.2D 6H 8S

TREESIG

N

FIRE HYDRANT BOOSTER

FIRE SPRINKLER BOOSTER

FOOTPATHBITUMEN

PARKING

METER

CONC. PRAM

CROSSINGCONC. PRAM

CROSSING

OPTUS

PITBITUMEN FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

CONCRETE

CONC

DRIVEWAYCONC

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

SIGN SIGN SIGN

SIGN

5.9

0 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.90 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.9

0 TOP

5.99 TOP

5.94 TOP

3.46 F.

L.

3.44 F.L.

5.92 TOP

3.4

4 F.L.

5.7

7

TOP

5.92 TO

P

STEPS

LANDIN

G

LANDING0.6D 6H 12S

5.09 TOP 5.09 TOP 5.08 TOP 5.13 TOP

LOW CONC WALL 0.15 HIGH

3.2

1

2.4

8

2.3

5

3.3

1

2.6

2

2.4

4

2.4

7

2.5

0

2.5

2

2.3

9

2.3

92.6

32.2

41.9

7

3.4

6

2.50

2.5

0

2.50

2.50

2.502.52

2.512.502.52

2.50

2.50

2.492.51

2.512.50

2.5

1

2.5

1

2.51

2.10

2.83

2.5

8

2.56 2.53

2.24

2.28

2.36

2.382.34

LIGHTPOLE

MANHOLE

2.16

2.16

2.14

2.14

LIGHTPOLE

2.21

2.27 PIT

2.28

2.29

2.23

2.24

2.17

MANHOLE

2.142.

132.14

2.14

2.2

12.2

2

PIT

2.2

3

2.2

82.2

8

PIT

2.2

82.2

9

MANHOLE

2.43

2.9

2

MANHOLE

2.42

MANHOLE

2.17

2.14

2.15 2.

17

2.3

82.3

9

PIT

MANHOLE

2.18

2.17

2.15

2.20

2.3

62.3

7

2.3

9

MANHOLE

MANHOLE

MANHOLE

2.31

PIT

PIT

2.232.

23

2.23

2.2

8

PIT

2.2

9

MANHOLE

2.77

SE

WER

2.73

2.61

GAS

2.52PIT

2.67

2.69

2.70

GAS

2.6

2

3.473.47

PIT

PIT

FE

NC

E

GRATED DRAIN GRATED DRAIN

GRATED DRAIN

GRATED DRAIN

GR

ATE

D

DR

AIN

COL.

3.4

7 F.L.

DO

OR

TOP 5.6

6

2.54 F.L.

DOOR

4.57 T

OP

8.1

0U/S

RO

OF

DOOR

ROLLER DOOR6.20 TOP2.10 F.L.

LOUVRES

9.07 TOP8.12 U/S

5.29 TOP

DOORS

2.58 F.L. 2.57 F.L.

5.29 TOP

DOOR

DOOR

5.57 TOP

2.50 F.L.

LOUVRES

5.57 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.57 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.57 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.82 TOP

5.28 BOT.

DOOR

5.58 TOP

2.51 F.L.

LOUVRES

5.58 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.58 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.58 TOP

4.27 BOT.

LOUVRES

5.79 TOP

5.27 BOT.

2.57 F.L.

5.29 TOP

DOOR

DOOR

DOOR

5.58 TOP

2.50 F.L.

METAL

LOW WALLCONC WALL CONCFENCE ON

EDGE OF

TREE CANOPY

EDGE OF

TREE CANOPY

EDGE OF

TREE CANOPY

ELE

C.

KIO

SK

RL 2.50

TOP OF CONC

RL -5.28 APPROX

SLOPING CONC FLOORRL -7.53

CONC FLOOR

450mm

DIA S

EWER

PIPE ABOVE GROUND

CENTRE-LINE RL 3.10

INV RL -2.09400mm DIA SEWER

PVC VENT PIPE

ATTACHED TO WALL

INV RL -5.23

INV RL

-5.20

LIGHT

E E E

EE

E

E EE E

E

E

E E

EE E

W

W

T

T TT

T

T

T

GU

AR

D

RAIL

DECCW

Declaration Area

N21122

TTTTOF

OFOF

OF

EEEE

EEEE

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

S

W

E

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

375 DIA RISIN

G

MAIN

SS

S

S

S

S S

S

S

SS

SRA

SRA

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRAE E E E E

DIS

US

ED

SE

WE

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

SEWER

MANHOLE

S

450mm

DIA. S

EWER

375mm

DIA. S

EWER

450mm

DIA. S

EWER

WEIR CREST

RL 1.40450

mm

DIA

INV

RL 1.1

7

225mm DIA

INV RL 1.27

INV RL 1.17

225mm DIA

225

mm

DIA

INV

RL 1.7

0

INV RL 0.05

600mm

DIA.

225mm DIA

INV RL -3.40

INV RL -3.40225mm DIA

225 DIA

INV RL

-3.68

225mm DIA225mm DIA

INV RL -3.10INV RL -3.10

INV RL -3.10

INV

RL -

0.4

5

150mm DIAINV RL 1.57

H

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

HYD SVW

E E E E E E E E E E E E

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

INV RL -2.40INV RL -2.40

225mm DIA

INV

RL -0.1

0 INV

RL 0.3

5

SV

450mm DIA

INV RL

-3.99450mm DIA

225

mm

DIA

SRA

SRA

SRA

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

SRA

SWSW

SW

INV

RL

-3.518

SW

SW

SW

GG

GG

GG

G G G

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS S S S S

G

SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SWSW

SWSW

SW SW SW

150mm DIA 150mm DIA

S

S

150

mm

DIA

150

mm

DIA

450mm DIA

450mm DIA

E E E E E E E

30/9/2010

E E E E E E E

T

T T T T T

E E E E E E EE E E E E E

DE

CO

MMIS

SIO

NE

D

PU

MP

ST

ATIO

N

SP0059

DIS

USE

D SE

WE

R

LIN

E S

S

S

S

W W

W

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S

APPROX LOCATION SEWER

MARCH 1900

APPROX LOCATION SEWER

MARCH 1900

APPROX LOCATION SEWERMARCH 1900

APPROX LO

CATIO

N SEW

ER

MAR

CH 1900

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

1923 PLAN S/

O 40747

150

mm

DIA

(NO

W

GO

NE)

S S S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

S

225 DIA. CONC. ENCASEDIN

V RL

-2.67

INV

RL

-3.43

SWC PLAN14807WW

23/7/2004

SW

C

WAE SK9 28/10/2004

SW

C H

YDRA

375

mm

DIA

RISIN

G

MAIN

SW

C

WAE S

K9 28/10/2004

SW

C

HY

DR

A

30/9/2010

600mm DIA

STORMWATER

PIPE

225mm CI

300mm CICL

BOREHOLE

PIT

INV

RL 0.3

6IN

V

RL 0.3

6

INV RL 0.36

INV RL 0.36

INV

RL 1.1

1

INV RL 0.76

INV

RL 0.7

6

INV RL 0.76

INV RL -1.52

INV RL -1.53

INV

RL -1.43

INV RL -1.27SWC LONG SECTIONSP1129 RM2

INV RL -1.37

SWC DRAWING

SP1129 RM2

(LONG SECTION)

INV RL -1.95

RISING MAIN

SWC SP1129 RM2

(LONG SECTION)

RISING

MAIN

INV RL -

4.56

450 DIA

INV RL -3.99

INV RL -3.99

INV RL -3.518 INV RL -3.518

450mm DIA 450mm DIA

SP1129-SK2

INV

RL -3.68

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E EINV

RL -4.22

INV RL -4.27

INV RL -4.29

INV

RL

UN

KN

OW

N

EM

ER

GE

NC

YR

ELIE

F

LIN

E

INV

RL

UN

KN

OW

N

INV

RL 1.2

3

INV

RL 2.2

1

STO

RM

WATE

R

INV

RL 2.2

2

STO

RM

WATE

R

INV

RL

UN

KN

OW

N

CONC

SSS

SSSSSSS

ASSUMED DIRECTION SWC PLAN SP1129-SK5 SWC PLAN SP1129-SK5

INV RL

0.78

APPROX

INV RL 1.58APPROX

3.2

9

INV RL -0.16

APPROX

900mm DIA

INV RL

UNKNOWN

IN

V

RL

UNK

N

O

W

N

INV

RL

U

NK

NO

W

N

IN

V

RL

0

.34

APP

R

O

X

600m

m DIA

INV RL

1.34

S S S S S S S S S S S S S

PIT

INV

R

L

U

N

KNO

W

N

S

S

S

INV RL -0.16INV RL 0.43

(SP1129-SK3)

(S/O 40611)(S/O 40611)

(SP1129-SK3)(S/O 40611)

INV RL 1.02

MANHOLE SHOWN ON

SWC PLAN S/O 40611

NOT SURVEYED

INV RL 2.28

CONC

INV RL 2.13

S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

INV RL 8.50

INV RL 4.80

(INTERPOLATED)

INV RL 1.41

INV RL 0.81

INV

RL

UN

KN

OW

N

INV

RL

UNKNO

WN

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON SYDNEY WATER

WORK AS EXECUTED PLAN

SP1129 - 10/6/2004

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON SYDNEY WATER

WORK AS EXECUTED PLAN

SP1129 - 10/6/2004

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

SRA

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRASRA

SRASRA

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

B76097 - 19/9/1963

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

B76097 - 19/9/1963

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

B76097 - 19/9/1963

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

B76097 - 19/9/1963

0.76m COVER

Extent of

Lend

Lease

(Millers Point)

Develo

pm

ent

PROPOSED SEWER

OVERFLOW STORAGE

SWC PLAN 119297WW

PR

O

P

OSED

MAN

H

OLE LID

RL 2.5

0

PR

O

P

OSED

OVERFLO

W PIP

E

60

0

mm

DIA

SRMSRM

SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM SRM

SR

M

SRM

SR

M

SRM

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

PROPOSED INLET

INV RL -5.15

SWC PLAN 119297WW

PROPOSED LINE 1

450mm DIA

SWC PLAN 119297WW

PROPOSED OUTLET

INV RL -4.72

SWC PLAN 119297WW

PROPOSED SEWER RISING MAIN

150mm DIA

WARREN SMITH & PARTNERS

PLAN 3589_EW-WSP-H-1012

PROPOSED CONCRETE RAMP

TO RL 2.99 OVER

150mm DIA RISING MAIN

PROPOSED SEWER RISING MAIN

ABOVE GROUNDPROPOSED

INV RL 2.62

"PIT 1"

INV

RL

1.1

2

150

mm

DIA

SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW

INV

RL -

0.4

8

INV

RL

1.4

0

INV RL -0.27

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

S

CO

NFIR

ME

D 5/

2/

11

"PIT 2"

INV PIT RL 0.75

CONFIRMED 5/2/2011

"PIT 3"

INV PIT RL -1.50

CONFIRMED 5/2/2011

CONFIRMED 5/2/2011

INV PIT RL 0.23

CONFIRMED 5/2/11

"PIT 4"

INV PIT RL -4.00

CONFIRMED 5/2/11

"PIT 5"

INV PIT RL -2.24

CONFIRMED 5/2/11

"PIT 7"

INV PIT RL -3.07

CONFIRMED 5/2/2011

CO

NFIR

ME

D

5/

2/

11

CO

NFIR

ME

D 5/

2/

11

"PIT 6"

INV PIT RL 1.25

CONFIRMED 5/2/11INV VALVE RL 1.40

CONFIRMED 5/2/2011

2.93

2.2

9

2.3

9

2.4

42.4

4

2.6

02.5

92.5

4

2.6

8

2.2

8

2.3

0

2.2

5

2.2

3

2.3

0

2.2

9

2.2

8

2.3

0

2.3

4

2.2

6

2.5

62.4

32.4

52.4

2

WA

LK

WA

Y

WA

LK

WA

Y

CONCRETE

SLAB

SITE

SHEDS

COVERED AREA

SRA

SRA

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

1.39m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

0.76m COVER

(1963 PLAN)0.64m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

0.79m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

0.91m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

0.83m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

0.99m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

1.04m COVER

(1963 PLAN)0.94m COVER (1963)

0.76m COVER

(1963 PLAN)

SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA SRA

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

ISSUED - 16/4/2011

STATE RAIL ELECTRICAL CABLES

SHOWN ON RAILCORP PLAN

ISSUED - 16/4/2011

LANE MARKING

AREA CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

STRUCTURES IN THIS AREA

BSURVEY PLAN

STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BB2_PA2_A002

19 May 2016

Page 58: Lend Lease Development Plans

REFER TO PROJECTAPPLICATION MP10_0023

WAT

ERMA

N'S

QUAY

BART

ON ST

REET

BARANGAROO AVENUE

30 THE BOND 36 THE BOND GRAFTON ROAD

HICKSON ROAD

TREES REMOVED DUETO PROPOSED ROAD

TREES REMOVED DUETO PROPOSED ROAD

BARANGAROO STAGE 1ABARANGAROO STAGE 1BCENTRAL

BARANGAROO

EXISTING SAND FILLEDCAISSON SEA WALL TO BEDEMOLISHED TO ALLOWBASEMENT CONSTRUCTIONWHERE REQUIRED(SUBSEQUENT TOCONSTRUCTION OF NEWBASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

LEGEND

INTERIM KERB / ROADLINES

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:1000 @ A3

R4A PORTE CONCHEREENTRY DOCUMENTED BYSEPARATE DA SUBMISSION

ROAD AND SERVICESCONNECTION ZONE

EXTENT OF HARD STANDDEMOLITION

POTENTIAL ADDITIONALROCK/SOIL EXCAVATIONBEYOND SSD5897

PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

SERVICES ZONE

EXTENT OF BASEMENT

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 500 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A003STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION & SERVICES ZONE PLAN

Page 59: Lend Lease Development Plans

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

EXCAVATION OF ROCK TOFACILITATE FUTURE BASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

CENTRALBARANGAROO

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

VOID

LEGEND

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A100STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B0

Page 60: Lend Lease Development Plans

CAR

WAS

H

CAR WASH

ELEC.BOARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC.

BOARD

SERV

ICE

SERV

ICE

SERV

ICE

RETA

IL

RETA

IL

SERV

ICE

RETAIL

SERV

ICE

CENTRALBARANGAROO

R5 RESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

R4BRESIDENTIALTOWER CORELOADING DOCK

SSL -2300RESIDENTIALCARPARKING & LOADINGDOCK ENTRY & EXIT

R4ARESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

WASTERECYCLEAREA

SERVICES ZONE REFER TOCIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

RESIDENTIAL CARPARKING SSL -2.300TOTAL CAR PARKING (INCLUDING TANDEM) 135TOTAL TANDEM 6

EXCAVATION OF ROCK TOFACILITATE FUTURE BASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

26m2

RS

RS

RS

RS

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

RSRS

EXIT

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

BASEMENT GFA

LEGEND

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A101STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B1

Page 61: Lend Lease Development Plans

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC.

BOARD

R4BRESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

CENTRALBARANGAROO

R5 RESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

RESIDENTIAL PARKING RAMP DOWNTO CONNECT LOWER LEVELS

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

RESIDENTIAL CARPARKING SSL -5.300

TOTAL CAR PARKING (INCLUDING TANDEM) 219TOTAL TANDEM 18

R4ARESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

EXCAVATION OF ROCK TOFACILITATE FUTURE BASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

RS

RS EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

LEGEND

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A102STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B2

Page 62: Lend Lease Development Plans

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC.

BOARD

CENTRALBARANGAROO

R5 RESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

RESIDENTIAL PARKING RAMP DOWNTO CONNECT LOWER LEVELS

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

RESIDENTIAL CARPARKING SSL -8.250TOTAL CAR PARKING (INCLUDING TANDEM) 220TOTAL TANDEM 19

R4ARESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

EXCAVATION OF ROCK TOFACILITATE FUTURE BASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

R4BRESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

LEGEND

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A103STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B3

Page 63: Lend Lease Development Plans

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

ELEC.

BOARD

ELEC

.BO

ARD

R5 RESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

RESIDENTIAL PARKING RAMP DOWNTO CONNECT LOWER LEVELS

CENTRALBARANGAROO

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

R4ARESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

RESIDENTIAL CARPARKING SSL -11.200TOTAL CAR PARKING (INCLUDING TANDEM) 222TOTAL TANDEM 19

EXCAVATION OF ROCK TOFACILITATE FUTURE BASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

R4BRESIDENTIALTOWER CORE

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

EXIT

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

LEGEND

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A104STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B4

Page 64: Lend Lease Development Plans

CENTRALBARANGAROO

1_PA2_A300

1_PA2_A300

2_PA2_A301

2_PA2_A301

3_PA2_A302

3_PA2_A302

4_PA2_A303

4_PA2_A303

R4A RESIDENTIAL TOWER CORE SSL -16.900

R4B RESIDENTIAL TOWER CORE SSL -16.200

R5 RESIDENTIAL TOWER CORE SSL -16.000

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

PERIMETER RETAININGWALL DOCUMENTATIONCOVERED UNDERSEPARATE SUBMISSION NO.SSD5897

CONCRETE IN-SITURETAINING WALL

FITOUT OF ROOMS SUBJECT TO DESIGNDEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ISSUE CC.

PARKING IS INDICATIVE & SUBJECT TOFUTURE BUILDING APPROVALS.

ALL STRUCTURE IS FOR APPROVAL.LAYOUT, INCLUDING GFA, IS INDICATIVEAND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE& FACILITIES

LEGEND

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A105STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BASEMENT PLAN LEVEL B5

Page 65: Lend Lease Development Plans

Datum 0.0

SSL 0.000Basement B1

SSL -2.300Basement B2

SSL -5.300Basement B3

SSL -8.250Basement B4

SSL -11.200

Basement B0

SSL 0.500

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300GROUND FLOORRL 3.500

CONCRETE SLAB AS BASE FORLANDSCAPE AREARL 2.200

SET DOWN FOR PROPOSEDROAD SERVICES ANDINFRASTRUCTURE ZONE

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

SERVICES ZONE REFER TOCIVIL ENGINEERINGCONSULTANTS

BARA

NGAR

OO S

OUTH

SIT

E BO

UNDA

RY

INDICATIVEROCK LEVEL

EXTENT OF EXISTING KERB LINE

SSL -16.000

REFER PROJECTAPPLICATION MP10_0023

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A300STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

SECTION 01

Page 66: Lend Lease Development Plans

Datum 0.0

SSL 0.000Basement B1

SSL -2.300Basement B2

SSL -5.300Basement B3

SSL -8.250Basement B4

SSL -11.200

Basement B0

SSL 0.500

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

GROUND FLOORRL 3.500

CONCRETE SLAB AS BASE FORLANDSCAPE AREARL 2.200

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

HICKSON ROAD

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

BARA

NGAR

OO S

OUTH

SIT

E BO

UNDA

RY

FOOTPATH

INDICATIVEROCK LEVEL

POTENTIAL EXTENT OF EXCAVATION SSL -18.950

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A302STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

SECTION 03

Page 67: Lend Lease Development Plans

Datum 0.0

SSL 0.000

Basement B1

SSL -2.300Basement B2

SSL -5.300Basement B3

SSL -8.250Basement B4

SSL -11.200

Basement B0

SSL 0.500

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

CONCRETE SLAB AS BASE FORLANDSCAPE AREARL 2.200

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

BASEMENT PERIMETERRETENTION SYSTEM

HICKSON ROAD

BARA

NGAR

OO S

OUTH

SIT

E BO

UNDA

RY

POTENTIAL EXTENT OFEXCAVATION

INDICATIVEROCK LEVEL

FOOTPATHGROUND FLOORRL 3.500

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A303STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

SECTION 04

Page 68: Lend Lease Development Plans

BART

ON S

TREE

T

LIFT LOBBY

LIFT SHAFT

FIRE CONTROL ROOM

BASEMENT EXIT

CAR PARK AIRSUPPLY

WAT

ERMA

N'S

QUAY

CAR PARKAIR EXHAUST

LOADING DOCKAIR EXHAUST

BASEMENT EXIT 1BASEMENT EXIT 2

SUBSTATION 10 EXIT 1

LIFT LOBBY

LIFT SHAFT

SUBSTATION 10 EXIT 2

BARANGAROO AVENUE

CAR PARKAIR SUPPLY

LIFT SHAFT

LIFT LOBBY

BASEMENTEXIT

HICKSON ROAD

FIRE BOOSTER VALVES

CAR PARKROLLER SHUTTER

DIESELGENERATOR

RS

KEY PLAN

LEGEND

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3

ROAD LAYOUT INDICATIVE ONLY

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

INTERIM KERB / ROADLINES

R4A PORTE CONCHEREENTRY DOCUMENTED BYSEPARATE DA SUBMISSION

TEMPORARY BUILDINGELEMENTS

PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A400STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BUILDING ELEMENTS - GROUND FLOOR

Page 69: Lend Lease Development Plans

CAR PARKAIR EXHAUST

LOADING DOCK AIR EXHAUST

ROOF SLAB

SUBSTATIONEXIT 2

SUBSTATION 10

SUBSTATION 10 EXIT 1

MAIN SWITCH ROOM SUBSTATION 10

LIFT OVER RUN

ROOF SLAB OVER

LIFT OVER RUN

BASEMENTAIR SUPPLYSHAFT

LIFT OVER RUN

ROOF SLAB

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

TEMPORARY BUILDINGELEMENTS

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A401STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BUILDING ELEMENTS - PODIUM P1

Page 70: Lend Lease Development Plans

ROOF SLAB

ROOF SLAB OVER SUBSTATION 10

ROOF SLAB OVERBASEMENT AIRSUPPLY

TRANSFORMER HATCH

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

BARANGAROO SOUTHSITE BOUNDARY

TEMPORARY BUILDINGELEMENTS

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A402STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BUILDING ELEMENTS - PODIUM P2

Page 71: Lend Lease Development Plans

Podium P1

SSL 8.300

Podium P1

SSL 8.300

Podium P2

SSL 12.800

Podium P2

SSL 12.800

R4A L01

FFL 17.800

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

R4B L01

FFL 17.800

R5 L01

FFL 17.800

RENDERED BLOCKWORKPAINT FINISH

ALUMINIUM POWDER COATEDGRILLED ROLLER SHUTTER

SUBSTATION 10 VENTILATIONALUMINIUM POWDER COATEDLOUVRES AS PER 'AUSGRID'STANDARD

CONCRETE IN-SITU COLUMNS LIFT LOBBY- RENDERED

BLOCKWORK WITH GLAZEDENTRY DOOR AND AWNING(WEATHER PROTECTION) OVER

CONCRETE PAINT FINISH

LIFT OVERRUN

LID OVER AT PODIUMP2 SLAB LEVEL

CAR PARK AIR SUPPLYALUMINIUM POWDERCOATED LOUVRES

RENDEREDBLOCKWORK PAINT

RENDERED BLOCKWORKPAINT FINISH

FIRE CONTROL ROOMBASEMENT EXIT

BASEMENT STAIR AIRPRESSURISATIONALUMINIUM POWDERCOATED LOUVRES

FIRE BOOSTER VALVES

MAIN SWITCH ROOM VENTILATIONLOUVRES ALUMINIUM POWDER COATED

SUBSTATION 3m 2 HOUR FIRE RATEDEXCLUSION ZONE

SUBSTATION 6m AIR SUPPLY/OPENING EXCLUSION ZONE

Slab over Substation 10 SSL 13.950

Substation 10 SSL 9.500

Podium P1

SSL 8.300

Podium P2

SSL 12.800

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

CAR PARK & LOADING DOCKEXHAUST ALUMINIUM POWDERCOATED LOUVRES

BASEMENT STAIR ANDCORRIDOR AIR PRESSURISATIONALUMINIUM POWDER COATEDLOUVRES

BASEMENT EXITS SUBSTATION 10 EXITS CONCRETE IN-SITUCOLUMNS

TRANSFORMER AIR EXHAUSTLOUVRES/ ACCESS PANELS AS PER'AUSGRID' STANDARD

RENDERED BLOCKWORKPAINT FINISH

BASEMENT EXIT RAMP BEYONDRENDERED BLOCKWORK PAINTFINISH

SUBSTATION 6m AIR SUPPLY/ OPENINGEXCLUSION ZONE

Slab over Substation 10 SSL 13.950

Substation slab SSL 9.500

SUBSTATION 3m 2 HOUR FIRE RATEDEXCLUSION ZONE

Podium P1

SSL 8.300

Podium P2

SSL 12.800

Ground Floor

SSL 3.300

LIFT OVERRUN

CONCRETE PAINT FINISH

LID OVER AT PODIUM P2SLAB LEVEL

RENDEREDBLOCKWORKPAINT FINISH

BASEMENT EXIT

BASEMENT STAIR AIRPRESSURISATION ALUMINIUMPOWDER COATED LOUVRES

CAR PARK AIR SUPPLYALUMINIUM POWDERCOATED LOUVRES

LIFT LOBBY - RENDEREDBLOCKWORK WITH GLAZEDENTRY DOOR AND AWNING(WEATHER PROTECTION) OVER

01

02

03

KEY PLAN

Drawing:

Date: Revision:0 25M

BB2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Scale 1:500 @ A3PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: EXECUTIVE ARCHITECT:

RPBWRENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOPVia P.P. Rubens 29, 16158 Genova - Italy

Emanuela Baglietto | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 9512

Lend Lease DesignABN 97 000 098 16230 The Bond, 30 Hickson RoadMillers Point, NSW, 2000

Stephanie Smith | Nominated ArchitectNSW ARB 6480

Checked:Milan Busina19.05.2016Approved:Stephanie Smith19.05.2016

TEMPORARY BUILDINGELEMENTS

Scale 1 : 250 @ A1

19 May 2016 B_PA2_A501STAGE 1B BASEMENT SSD6960

BUILDING ELEMENTS - ELEVATIONS

1 : 250WATERMAN'S QUAY ELEVATION2

1 : 250BARANGAROO AVENUE ELEVATION3

1 : 250HICKSON ROAD ELEVATION1

Page 72: Lend Lease Development Plans

21 of 22

Attachment 5: Table T1 - Applicable ORWN Services

Zone Soil Analytical Results

Page 73: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

Location AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH01 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH33 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH36Sample Field ID BH01_0.3-0.4 BH01_1.0-1.2 BH01_2.0-2.2 BH01_4.0-4.1 QC01 QC02 BH33_0.75-0.85 BH33_5.0-5.2 BH36_1.0-1.2 BH36_2.5-2.9 BH36_4.0-4.4Sample Depth (m) 0.3-0.4 1-1.2 2-2.2 4-4.1 1-1.2 1-1.2 0.75-0.85 5-5.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.9 4-4.4Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Field_D Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalArea ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 ServicesSample Date 12/02/2009 12/02/2009 12/02/2009 12/02/2009 12/02/2009 12/02/2009 2/12/2010 2/12/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010 3/03/2010

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <1 <5 6 <5 - <5Barium mg/kg 10 20 40 70 40 30 15 - - 10 - 30Beryllium mg/kg 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 - <1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 - <1Chromium mg/kg 1 2 7 18 10 6 6 8 10 8 - 7Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600 - - - - - - - - - - - Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000 12 3 5 6 2 1 - - <2 - <2Copper mg/kg 1 240,000 331 17 44 92 11 6 264 12 <5 - <5Iron mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - - - - - Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500 6 19 30 16 14 11 6 36 17 - 9Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000 725 152 329 355 105 78 - - 43 - 73Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1Nickel mg/kg 1 6000 6 4 8 5 2 2 10 12 <2 - 2Vanadium mg/kg 5 106 16 32 51 16 11 - - 12 - 12Zinc mg/kg 1 400,000 46 38 2070 42 26 16 50 77 14 - 172-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 1.9 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05 - - - 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2 - - - - - <1 - - - - <1Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - 1.2 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 - - Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - 0.7 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 - - Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 1.4 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 4.9 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900* - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40 - - - 7.5 <4 <3 - <4 <4 - <3PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000 - - - - - 0 - - <0.5 - - Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 5.3 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - - 4.4 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.52,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.52-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.52-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.53-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <1 <1 - <0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - 4-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.54-methylphenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - 4-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - Phenol mg/kg 0.01 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Phenolics Total mg/kg - - - - - - - - - - - TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100* - - - <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - <10TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800* - - - <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 - <50TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300* - - - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 - <100TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400* - - - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 - <100Asbestos fibres - 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - weight of sample g 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15 - - - <1 <1 <1.5 - 0 <1 <1 <1 - <1Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120* - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300* - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000* - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000* - - - <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 1 of 6

Page 74: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900Chromium mg/kg 1Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 1 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 1 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 1 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

AECOM_BH36 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH37 AECOM_BH38 AECOM_BH38 AECOM_BH39 AECOM_BH39 AECOM_BH39 AECOM_BH39 AECOM_BH40BH36-0.07-0.1 BH37_0.06-0.1 BH37_2.5-2.7 BH37_5.5-5.7 BH38_0.15-0.25 BH38_2.5-2.7 BH39_0.15-0.25 BH39-2.5-2.7 BH39-20.5-20.7 BH39-4.0-4.2 BH40_1.0-1.20.7-0.1 0.06-0.1 2.5-2.7 5.5-5.7 0.15-0.25 2.5-2.7 0.15-0.25 2.5-2.7 20.5-20.7 4-4.2 1-1.2Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services19/02/2010 17/02/2010 17/02/2010 18/02/2010 18/02/2010 19/02/2010 18/02/2010 23/02/2010 24/02/2010 24/02/2010 18/02/2010

<5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <520 20 <10 30 30 30 20 110 10 110 20<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <12 2 5 8 4 6 2 8 4 10 9 - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - 12 12 <2 3 13 <2 13 3 <2 3 3256 225 23 <5 231 15 247 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - 8730 - - - - - - - 6 6 9 20 11 31 6 6 <5 7 10

753 768 9 125 864 185 819 156 <5 206 181<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

7 7 <2 5 7 3 7 3 <2 3 4119 125 8 15 128 14 139 10 <5 11 1351 47 11 28 50 57 52 18 <5 16 20 - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <4 - - - - <3 <4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <1 - - - - <0.5 <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <10 - - - - <10 <10 - - - - <50 - - - - <50 <50 - - - - <100 - - - - <100 <100 - - - - <100 - - - - <100 <100 - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - 20.2 - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - <1 <1 - - - - <0.2 - - - - <0.2 <0.2 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 2 of 6

Page 75: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900Chromium mg/kg 1Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 1 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 1 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 1 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH41 AECOM_BH46 AECOM_BH46 AECOM_BH46 BH017 BH017 BH017 BH049 BH049BH41_0.07-0.1 BH41_1.0-1.4 BH41_4.0-4.4 BH46-1.0-1.2 BH46-4.0-4.2 QC56 BH017 0.5-0.6 BH017 1.5-1.95 BH017 3.0-3.45 BH049_0.3-0.5 BH049_3.0-3.450.07-0.1 1-1.4 4-4.4 1-1.2 4-4.2 1-1.2 0.5-0.6 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Field_D Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services19/02/2010 4/03/2010 4/03/2010 23/02/2010 23/02/2010 23/02/2010 8/05/2006 8/05/2006 8/05/2006 25/05/2006 25/05/2006

<5 7 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <520 510 20 270 50 300 - - - - - <1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <12 11 7 20 8 11 5 35 19 3 3 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - 13 13 4 5 5 5 - - - - - 356 11 <5 7 8 5 150 49 32 262 <5 - 38,400 - - - - - - - - - 7 17 8 11 6 12 30 21 18 6 8

852 682 215 285 130 352 - - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.111 21 5 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 2127 22 10 13 11 14 - - - - - 54 94 34 29 24 34 71 56 40 54 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <4 <4 <4 - <4 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 - <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <10 <10 <10 - <10 - - - <2 - - <50 <50 <50 - <50 - - - <50 - - <100 <100 <100 - <100 - - - <100 - - <100 <100 <100 - <100 - - - <100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 - <1 - - - <0.4 - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - <0.2 -

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 3 of 6

Page 76: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900Chromium mg/kg 1Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 1 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 1 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 1 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

BH109 BH109 BH113 BH113 BH114 BH114 BH116 BH116 BH116 BH116 BH143BH109 0.3_0.5 BH109 3.0_3.45 BH113 1.5_1.95 BH113 3.0_3.45 BH114 0.3_0.5 BH114 3.0_3.45 BH116 1.5_1.95 BH116 1.5_1.95 BH116 3.0_3.45 BH116 3.0_3.45 BH143 1.5_1.950.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 0.3-0.5 3-3.45 1.5-1.95 1.5-1.95 3-3.45 3-3.45 1.5-1.95Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillNormal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalBlock 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services ORWN Services27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 28/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 27/06/2006 28/06/2006 10/07/2006

<5 <5 <5 5 <5 6 - <5 - <5 <5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - <1 - <1 <13 41 10 33 4 37 - 9 - 31 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

225 20 <5 12 198 12 - 30 - 18 11 - - - - - - - - - - - 12 14 9 17 15 15 - 23 - 14 6 - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 - <0.1 <0.16 8 4 8 5 7 - 4 - 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - 53 34 21 52 54 47 - 38 - 28 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 - 0.6 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 1.7 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 2 <0.5 0.7 - 0.7 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.3 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 2.3 <0.5 0.9 - 1.3 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <4 <4 <4 3.2 9.2 <4 0.7 - 1.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 1 <0.5 <0.5 - 1 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 2.5 <0.5 0.9 - 1.1 - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 - <2 - - - <50 <50 <50 70 <50 60 - <50 - - - <100 <100 <100 540 130 620 - 350 - - - <100 130 <100 470 210 360 - 410 - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 - <0.4 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - -

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 4 of 6

Page 77: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900Chromium mg/kg 1Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 1 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 1 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 1 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

BH143 BH159 BH159 BH408 BH409 BH409 TBH01 TBH01 TBH01BH143 3.0_3.45 BH159_0.25-0.35 D1408-8 BH408_2.0-2.4 BH409_3.7-4.0 BH409_5.0-5.3 DUP 01 TBH01_0.43-0.5 TRIP013-3.45 0.25-0.35 2-2.4 3.7-4 5-5.3 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5 0.43-0.5Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Sand FillNormal Normal Interlab_D Normal Normal Normal Field_D Normal Interlab_DORWN Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services Block 4 Services10/07/2006 14/08/2006 14/08/2006 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 14/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011 5/02/2011

<5 - - <5 <5 22 <5 <5 2.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.510 - - 8 15 7 16 12 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 - - 36 <5 <5 12 11 31 - - - - - - - - - 14 - - 10 6 <5 71 103 120 - - - - - - - - -

<0.1 - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.18 - - 8 <2 3 4 4 <5 - - - - - - - - - 43 - - 30 8 7 24 30 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.2 <0.5 2.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - - - - - -

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.5 <0.5 1.9 <0.5 0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 6.2 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 1.9 0.8<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 6.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.7 1 - - <1 - - - - - 1.7

<0.5 <0.5 - 7.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.7<0.5 <0.5 - 3.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.4 0.7<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 12.6 <0.5 1.2 0.7 3.1 1.3<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 33.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<4 <4 <3 36.7 <4 0.6 <4 8.7 3.8 - - 0 - - - - - 7.9

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 6.6 <0.5 6.8 <0.5 1.2 <0.5<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 12.9 <0.5 1.8 0.7 3 1.1 - - - 0.03 <0.01 - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - 0.02 <0.01 - - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - - - - - - <0.01 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - <2 <2 <10 <10 <10 12 <10 <10 <10<50 <50 <50 <50 <50 150 <50 <50 <50<100 270 <100 190 <100 180 <100 <100 <100<100 960 280 260 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

<0.4 0.3 <1.5 - 0 <1 <1 2.9 <1 <1 <0.15<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 1.8 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5<0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5<0.2 0.3 <1 <0.5 <0.5 1.1 <0.5 <0.5 <1<0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 5 of 6

Page 78: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T1ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_Group ChemName output unit

EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC 2013) HILD D

Arsenic mg/kg 4 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 0.5 900Chromium mg/kg 1Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 1 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 1 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 1 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 1 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.05Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1Fluorene mg/kg 0.1Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.5 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1Pyrene mg/kg 0.12,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.012-methylphenol mg/kg 0.012-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.013-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.53-Methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-methylphenol mg/kg 0.014-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.01Phenol mg/kg 0.01Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg 0.15Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

BTEX

Metals

Asbestos

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results

Number of Detects

Minimum Concentration

Minimum Detect

Maximum Concentration

Maximum Detect

Average Concentration

Median Concentration

Standard Deviation

Number of Guideline Exceedances

Number of Guideline Exceedances

48 6 <1 2.4 22 22 3.2 2.5 3 0 025 24 <10 10 510 510 73 30 118 0 025 2 <1 1 1 1 0.54 0.5 0.14 0 048 0 <0.1 ND <1 ND 0.49 0.5 0.074 0 048 48 2 2 41 41 11 8 9.6 0 02 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0 025 20 1 1 13 13 5.6 4 4.7 0 048 36 <5 5 356 356 69 12 104 0 02 2 8730 8730 38400 38400 23565 0 048 46 <5 6 120 120 18 11.5 23 0 025 24 <5 9 864 864 338 206 298 0 047 1 <0.05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.053 0.05 0.022 0 048 43 <2 2 21 21 5.4 5 3.5 0 025 24 <5 8 139 139 42 14 48 0 048 47 <5 7 2070 2070 78 34 294 0 02 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0 05 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 02 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0 030 1 <0.5 5.6 5.6 5.6 0.43 0.25 0.98 0 030 2 <0.5 2.2 2.8 2.8 0.4 0.25 0.58 0 02 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0 030 5 <0.5 0.5 3.5 3.5 0.48 0.25 0.68 0 030 8 <0.5 0.6 6.2 6.2 0.65 0.25 1.1 0 030 6 <0.5 0.7 6.3 6.3 0.62 0.25 1.2 0 05 1 <1 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.74 0.5 0.54 0 025 7 <0.5 0.7 7.1 7.1 0.75 0.25 1.4 0 030 5 <0.5 0.6 4.5 4.5 0.47 0.25 0.79 0 025 4 <0.5 0.7 3.1 3.1 0.43 0.25 0.58 0 030 6 <0.5 0.7 5.2 5.2 0.56 0.25 0.94 0 030 1 <0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.27 0.25 0.082 0 030 10 <0.5 0.7 12.6 12.6 1.2 0.25 2.4 0 030 1 <0.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.32 0.25 0.36 0 030 5 <0.5 0.5 3.6 3.6 0.42 0.25 0.62 0 030 1 <0.5 33.8 33.8 33.8 1.4 0.25 6.1 0 030 9 0.6 0.6 36.7 36.7 3.7 2 6.6 0 06 3 0 7.9 7.9 7.9 1.4 0.25 3.2 0 030 7 <0.5 1 6.8 6.8 0.98 0.25 1.8 0 030 10 <0.5 0.7 12.9 12.9 1.2 0.25 2.4 0 013 1 <0.01 0.03 <0.5 0.03 0.21 0.25 0.087 0 013 1 <0.01 0.02 <0.5 0.02 0.21 0.25 0.089 0 013 0 <0.01 ND <0.5 ND 0.21 0.25 0.092 0 011 0 <0.5 ND <1 ND 0.45 0.5 0.1 0 02 1 <0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.0125 0 013 0 <0.01 ND <0.5 ND 0.21 0.25 0.092 0 02 1 <0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.0125 0 02 0 <0.01 ND <0.01 ND 0.005 0 013 1 <0.01 0.01 <0.5 0.01 0.21 0.25 0.091 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 031 1 <2 12 12 12 3.9 5 2.4 0 031 3 <50 60 150 150 32 25 24 0 031 7 <100 130 620 620 112 50 144 0 031 8 <100 130 960 960 136 50 194 0 01 1 0 ND 0 ND 0 0 01 1 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2 0 031 4 <0.15 0.3 2.9 2.9 0.46 0.5 0.48 0 031 1 <0.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.16 0.1 0.31 0 031 1 <0.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.31 0.25 0.6 0 031 0 <0.2 ND <0.5 ND 0.2 0.25 0.071 0 031 2 <0.2 0.3 1.1 1.1 0.26 0.25 0.19 0 031 1 <0.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.25 0.25 0.3 0 0

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T1 Services Zone.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 6 of 6

Page 79: Lend Lease Development Plans

22 of 22

Attachment 6: Table T2 - Applicable ORWN Interim

Public Domain Soil Analytical Results

Page 80: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T2ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

Location AECOM_BH46 AECOM_BH46 AECOM_BH47 AECOM_BH56 AECOM_BH73 BH021 BH054 BH063 BH143Sample Field ID BH46-1.0-1.2 QC56 BH47-1.0-1.2 BH56_2.5-2.7 BH73_2.5-2.7 BH021 1.5-1.95 BH054-1.5-1.6 BH063-1.5-1.65 BH143 1.5_1.95Sample Depth (m) 1-1.2 1-1.2 1-1.2 2.5-2.7 2.5-2.7 1.5-1.95 1.5-1.6 1.5-1.65 1.5-1.95Matrix Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill Fill FillSample Type Normal Field_D Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal NormalAreaSample Date 23/02/2010 23/02/2010 22/02/2010 4/03/2010 2/03/2010 9/05/2006 29/05/2006 1/06/2006 10/07/2006

Chem_GroupChemName output unit EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) HIL D

Arsenic mg/kg 5 160 3000 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Barium mg/kg 10 270 300 120 80 20 - - - - Beryllium mg/kg 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - Cadmium mg/kg 1 900 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Chromium mg/kg 2 20 11 8 11 8 22 8 8 8Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600 - - - - - - - - - Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000 5 5 3 3 <2 - - - - Copper mg/kg 5 240,000 7 5 19 25 <5 24 6 6 11Iron mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - - - Lead mg/kg 5 1800 1500 11 12 164 290 26 70 24 46 6Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000 285 352 137 214 28 - - - - Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Nickel mg/kg 2 6000 6 6 4 5 2 21 4 3 4Vanadium mg/kg 5 13 14 21 13 8 - - - - Zinc mg/kg 5 400,000 29 34 177 118 18 65 20 30 182-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - 2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - 3-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 1.1 - Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 1.1 - Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 3.2 - Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - 0.5 - - - 8.1 - Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 8.8 - Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - 0.6 - - - 10.4 - Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 6.3 - Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 3.6 - Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 7.8 - Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 1.1 - Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - 0.9 - - - 18.3 - Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 1.6 - Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 4.8 - Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 370 1900* <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - 0.7 - CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40 <4 <4 - 1.1 - - - 50.9 - PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 4000 - - - - - - - - - Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - 0.6 - - - 9.1 - Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - 1 - - - 18.9 - 2,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - 2-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - 2-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - 3-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5 <1 <1 - <1 - - - - - 4-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - Phenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - - - - Phenolics Total mg/kg - - - - - - - - - TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100* <10 <10 - <10 - - <2 <2 - TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800* <50 <50 - <50 - - <50 <50 - TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300* <100 <100 - <100 - - <100 420 - TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400* <100 <100 - <100 - - <100 400 - Asbestos fibres - 0.1 - - 0 - - - - - - weight of sample g 0.01 - - 49.9 - - - - - - Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kg <1 <1 - <1 - - <0.4 <0.4 - Benzene mg/kg 0.2 120* <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - - <0.2 <0.2 - Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300* <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.2 <0.2 - Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000* <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.2 <0.2 - Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000* <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.2 <0.2 - Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.2 <0.2 -

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

Metals

Asbestos

BTEX

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T2 Interim PD.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 1 of 2

Page 81: Lend Lease Development Plans

Table T2ORWN Services Zone

Stage 1B SEPP 55 LetterBarangaroo South

Lend Lease

LocationSample Field IDSample Depth (m)MatrixSample TypeAreaSample Date

Chem_GroupChemName output unit EQL ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) EIL

ASC NEPM (NEPC, 2013) HIL D

Arsenic mg/kg 5 160 3000Barium mg/kg 10Beryllium mg/kg 1Cadmium mg/kg 1 900Chromium mg/kg 2Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 3600Cobalt mg/kg 2 4000Copper mg/kg 5 240,000Iron mg/kg 50Lead mg/kg 5 1800 1500Manganese mg/kg 5 60,000Mercury mg/kg 0.1 730Nickel mg/kg 2 6000Vanadium mg/kg 5Zinc mg/kg 5 400,0002-chloronaphthalene mg/kg 0.52-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.53-methylcholanthrene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5Acetophenone mg/kg 0.5Anthracene mg/kg 0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(b)&(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 1Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Chrysene mg/kg 0.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5Fluorene mg/kg 0.5Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 370 1900*CPAH (ESDAT) mg/kg 40PAHs (Sum of total) mg/kg 4000Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5Pyrene mg/kg 0.52,4-dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.52-methylphenol mg/kg 0.52-nitrophenol mg/kg 0.53-&4-methylphenol mg/kg 0.54-chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg 0.5Phenol mg/kg 0.5Phenolics Total mg/kgTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 2 5100*TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 3800*TPH C15-C28 mg/kg 100 5300*TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 7400*Asbestos fibres - 0.1weight of sample g 0.01Total Xylene (ESDAT) mg/kgBenzene mg/kg 0.2 120*Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.2 5300*Toluene mg/kg 0.2 18000*Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 15000*Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.2

NOTES: EIL - Ecological Investigation LevelHIL - Health Investigation Level* CRC Care (2011) Health Screening Level - Direct Contact

Metals

Asbestos

BTEX

TPH

Phenols

PAHs

Statistical SummaryNumber of Results

Number of Detects

Minimum Concentration

Minimum Detect

Maximum Concentration

Maximum Detect

Average Concentration

Median Concentration

Standard Deviation

Number of Guideline Exceedances

Number of Guideline Exceedances 9 0 <5 ND <5 ND 2.5 2.5 0 0 0

5 5 20 20 300 300 158 120 122 0 05 0 <1 ND <1 ND 0.5 0.5 0 0 09 0 <1 ND <1 ND 0.5 0.5 0 0 09 9 8 8 22 22 12 8 5.5 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 05 4 <2 3 5 5 3.4 3 1.7 0 09 8 <5 5 25 25 12 7 8.6 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 09 9 6 6 290 290 72 26 95 0 05 5 28 28 352 352 203 214 127 0 09 1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.056 0.05 0.017 0 09 9 2 2 21 21 6.1 4 5.7 0 05 5 8 8 21 21 14 13 4.7 0 09 9 18 18 177 177 57 30 55 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 04 1 <0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.46 0.25 0.43 0 04 1 <0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.46 0.25 0.43 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 04 1 <0.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 0.99 0.25 1.5 0 04 2 <0.5 0.5 8.1 8.1 2.3 0.375 3.9 0 04 1 <0.5 8.8 8.8 8.8 2.4 0.25 4.3 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 04 2 <0.5 0.6 10.4 10.4 2.9 0.425 5 0 04 1 <0.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 1.8 0.25 3 0 04 1 <0.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 1.1 0.25 1.7 0 04 1 <0.5 7.8 7.8 7.8 2.1 0.25 3.8 0 04 1 <0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.46 0.25 0.43 0 04 2 <0.5 0.9 18.3 18.3 4.9 0.575 8.9 0 04 1 <0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 0.59 0.25 0.68 0 04 1 <0.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 1.4 0.25 2.3 0 04 1 <0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.36 0.25 0.23 0 04 2 1.1 1.1 50.9 50.9 14 2 25 1 10 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 04 2 <0.5 0.6 9.1 9.1 2.6 0.425 4.4 0 04 2 <0.5 1 18.9 18.9 5.1 0.625 9.2 0 03 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 03 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 03 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 03 0 <1 ND <1 ND 0.5 0.5 0 0 03 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 03 0 <0.5 ND <0.5 ND 0.25 0.25 0 0 00 0 99999 ND 0 ND 0 05 0 <2 ND <10 ND 3.4 5 2.2 0 05 0 <50 ND <50 ND 25 25 0 0 05 1 <100 420 420 420 124 50 165 0 05 1 <100 400 400 400 120 50 157 0 01 1 0 ND 0 ND 0 0 01 1 49.9 49.9 49.9 49.9 49.9 0 05 0 <0.4 ND <1 ND 0.38 0.5 0.16 0 05 0 <0.2 ND <0.2 ND 0.1 0.1 0 0 05 0 <0.2 ND <0.5 ND 0.19 0.25 0.082 0 05 0 <0.2 ND <0.5 ND 0.19 0.25 0.082 0 05 0 <0.2 ND <0.5 ND 0.19 0.25 0.082 0 05 0 <0.2 ND <0.5 ND 0.19 0.25 0.082 0 0

Data Entry: Data Review: AECOM Table T2 Interim PD.xlsm

20/08/2015Page 2 of 2