Upload
roger-williams
View
74
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lessons from Two Companies Executing a Joint Global Strategy
Roger Williams, Yahoo!
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• 2010 - Yahoo!-Microsoft signed internet search dealo Bing Search and Ads platform to replace Yahoo!
platformso Premium advertisers managed by Yahoo!; SMB by
Microsoft
• 22 markets transitioned to form Yahoo! Bing Network
• Transition = technical cutover and business transition
• 300m keywords, 50k accounts, $$ millions
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
What Does That Look Like?
Search results(from Bing)
Search ads(from Bing Ads)
Yahoo! search page
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
1. Team Leadership and Reporting
2. Keeping the Team Aligned
3. Keeping the Companies Aligned
4. Managing the Global Distribution of Work
5. Managing across Company Cultures
6. Managing across Regional Cultures
7. Governance and Escalation
Seven Lessons
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
1 – Team Leadership & Reporting
(AP Photo/Karel Prinsloo)
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
Virtual Team StructureMicrosoftYahoo!
Joint Track
Joint Track
Joint Track
Joint TrackAdvertiser Migration Sales/Service/Marketing
Publisher Systems Supply Engineering
Marketplace Marketplace
etc… etc…
All-Up TrackPM PMO
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Form Virtual Track Teams- Map functions to work jointly, with identified leads
• Distribute Ownership to Tracks- Empower tracks to make and report decisions jointly
• Establish Forums for Cross-Track Coordination- Look for dependencies, match to rhythm of business
• Define Escalation Paths- Track leads can get issue-attention in either company
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
2 – Keeping the Team Aligned
(photo: Hot Spot Media)
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Weekly Track Leads’ meetings- Each track lead reports top issues for discussion- Each track updates master plan
• Weekly Leadership Forum- Pre-work issues, discuss policy, difficult decisions
• Daily Standups through rest of week- Leads and next-level meet on phone, 15 minutes
• Communications past leads to whole team- Emails and All-hands reach into org, past leads
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
4 – Keeping the Companies Aligned
(photo: defense.gov)
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Identify functional Points of Contact- Orgs and roles probably don’t map directly
• Establish a rhythm of Joint Status Reviews- Track leads from both companies report together- Frequent enough to minimize conspiracy-theorizing
• Use daily Control Rooms during peak periods- Keep technical teams coordinated during execution- Phone bridges, IM-chat, web-conferencing work
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Ensure Plans of Record are available - Make plans/decisions instantly, globally accessible - Use network repositories: Sharepoint, Drive, twikis
• Get Together Regularly (at least some of teams)- Buy-in to plans is best obtained in person - Problem-solve on issues crossing multiple functions- Conceptual discussions can’t be done remotely- 2 months not meeting: “those people” become jerks
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
3 – Managing the Global Distribution of Work
9am 4pm 9:30pm 12am
“We’re on holiday!”
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Operate on Global Time- Spread the burden of out-of-hours calls- Schedule work against a global work-week- Every day is a holiday somewhere
• Use Collaboration Technologies- Key technologies: phone & web-conferencing- Supporting technologies: preparation, taking notes
• Ensure People are not just email addresses- Dependent teams need established relationships
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Kickoff New Projects Face-to-Face- Establish relationships with new teams- Understand market-specific conditions- Gain commitment to plans- Transfer knowledge from other regions- Critical people to visit may not be most senior
• Celebrate! (if you can)- No good solutions we found- Everyone celebrating from home isn’t a real party
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
5 – Managing across Company Cultures
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
Companies in the same business have a lot common• Commitment to making it work• Technical competence• Quality processes
But don’t be fooled by appearances…• Segmentation of responsibilities is a function
of size• Communication efficiency is function of
organization• Norms for agreement, consensus and ritual
may differ
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
6 – Managing across Regional Cultures
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
Local culture does impact team interaction:• Problem-solving – approaches vary• Hierarchy – varying needs to respect/defer• Directness – comfort with “straight talk”
varies
But normal work constraints are as important…• Task Focus – is the strongest aligning factor• Language – weakest user may be in any
team• Organizational – need to please local and
corp mgmt• Situational – internal team rivalry
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
7 – Governance & Escalation
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
• Formal Channels- Ensure escalation paths are widely known- Enforce adherence to channels established- Weekly leadership calls for work-in-progress - Bi-monthly Governance for transitioned markets- Monthly Executive Clearing House- Bi-annual CEO meetings
• Informal Channels- Twice-weekly PMO sync-ups- Over time increasing use of established relationships
The Strategic Execution Conference, April 24-25, 2013
Thank You
Roger Williams, SCPMSenior Director, Program Management, [email protected]