19
Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union The Mansfield Pacific Retreat Abyd Karmali 27 August 2003

Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

  • Upload
    noma

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union. The Mansfield Pacific Retreat Abyd Karmali 27 August 2003. Key Messages. Governments across the European Union are increasingly experimenting with market-based mechanisms to address environmental problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

The Mansfield Pacific Retreat

Abyd Karmali27 August 2003

Page 2: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

2

Key Messages

Governments across the European Union are increasingly experimenting with market-based mechanisms to address environmental problems

EU will shortly launch world’s first international emissions trading market for greenhouse gases

EU-based companies have been encouraging a shift from command-and-control to more market-based approaches but are only now appreciating unanticipated impacts

Page 3: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

3

Outline of Presentation

Overview of EU Market-Based Mechanisms

Case Study: EU Emissions Trading Scheme

Lessons Learned

Page 4: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

4

Helping clients manage the

world’s natural,

physical,economic

resources in asustainable

way

Asset Acquisition & Deployment

• Wholesale power market and renewables energy analysis

• Transmission and interconnection assessment

• Asset valuation• Due diligence• Asset & portfolio optimisation

A global environment, economics, and energy consulting firm

Network Analysis

• Regulatory strategy• Network benchmarking• Network valuation• Value of transmission

Environment and Climate Change Management

• Regulatory analysis• Environmental strategy• Value-at-stake analysis• Emissions trading

analysis• Market mechanisms

design • Corporate Responsibility

Other Services

• Transport sector analysis• Energy efficiency• Information management

systems• Economic & community

development• Emergency management• Strategic communications

Page 5: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

5

Overview of EU Market-Based Mechanisms

Page 6: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

6

Agencies in EU increasingly using market mechanisms

Tradable permit systems– France: tradable development rights for land preservation

– Netherlands: tradable fishery quotas

Deposit-refund systems– Austria: electric bulbs

– Denmark: beverage containers and lead batteries

Environmentally motivated subsidies– Sweden: grants for bio-fuels

– UK: enhanced capital allowance for energy efficient technology

Page 7: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

7

Heterogeneous policies used across EU for green energy

Providing direct financial incentives• Investment-based: subsidies on green

investments, tax rebates, and incentives

• Output-based: feed-in tariffs or preferential rates

Setting green energy quotas• Tradable: certificates for green electricity produced

• Not-tradable: generators bid for capacity or are set portfolio quota

Page 8: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

8

Case Study: EU Emissions Trading Scheme

Page 9: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

9

EU ETS relies on ‘cap-and-trade’ approach

Limits are set on allowed emissions, the corresponding allowances can be freely traded amongst participating companies, so that:

Imposes direct cap on aggregate emissions – the source of the problem

Efficiency emerges from free trading Market-based, lowest-cost ‘price of carbon’

emerges from the trading market Also includes “baseline and credit” mechanism

Page 10: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

10

Overview of EU Emission Trading Scheme

Government (Member states determine allocations)

Absolute Target Holders

(>20MW generators)

Verification

ReportingApproval

Projects(JI, CDM)

Market

Page 11: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

11

Strong underlying rationale for an emissions trading scheme

-0,4

-30,7

-9,3

-8,4

-1,1

-0,3

-0,2

5,7

6,1

7,3

8,5

8,8

10,2

13,5

16,3

16,5

-40,0 -30,0 -20,0 -10,0 0,0 10,0 20,0

EU-15

Luxembourg

Germany

United Kingdom

Finland

Sw eden

France

Greece

Belgium

Italy

Austria

Netherlands

Portugal

Denmark

Ireland

Spain

Distance to target indicators (DTI): difference between (linear) targets and trends in 1999:

Page 12: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

12

Typical company abatement cost curves highlight benefits

• Q1 = total negative cost level of emissions abatement;

• (1) = total cost savings to company

• Q2 = total cost-effective level of emissions abatement and

• (2) – (1) = net financial cost to company

Cost/Price(£/tonne CO2

e)

Level of GHG abatement

(1)

(2)

US$10 (market price of GHG in trading system)

QN QC

Tonnes CO2

e

Page 13: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

13

EU ETS provides significant boost to the CDM markets

The Clean Development Mechanism provides companies opportunity to generate additional revenue

First two projects recently had their methodologies approved by the CDM Executive Board– Korea HFC emissions reduction project

– Brazil landfill gas management project

CDM credits can be sold into the EU ETS starting in 2008

Page 14: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

14

Lessons Learned

Page 15: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

15

Short-term drivers of value for EU based-companies

Markets for project-based

reductions

Governmentpolicies

Stakeholder Concerns

New revenuestreams

Operating costsProduct prices

Cashflows

SalesCost of capital

Key drivers

Value impacts

Can value impact be assessed?

Can be quantified and

compared against

transaction costs

Can be quantified and

competitiveness impacts analysed

Indirect, anecdotal data

only

Page 16: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

16

Impact on UK power plant asset value from choice of allocation method

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

ReferenceCase

Va

lue

In

de

x (

Re

fere

nc

e V

alu

e =

10

0)

Page 17: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

17

Impact of market-clearing price on a German power plant asset value

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Low Price Mid Price High Price

Incremental energy value Incremental emissions value Net incremental impact

Page 18: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

18

Summary of Lessons Learned

Market-based mechanisms provide a new driver of value for companies operating in the EU

The critical interface between governments and companies relates to the method for allocating new forms of property rights– Companies need to be meaningfully engaged in the

debate

Companies are only now realising the level of analysis required to fully appreciate the implications on their competitiveness

Page 19: Lessons Learned Market-Based Approaches: European Union

19

For More Information

Abyd Karmali

Director, ICF Consulting

Hamilton House

Mabledon Place

Bloomsbury, London

WC1H 9BB United Kingdom

+44.(0).20.7554.8752

[email protected]