Click here to load reader
Upload
ragad3199
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Monte Neil Stewart
STEWART TAYLOR & MORRIS PLLC LAWYERS
12550 W. Explorer Drive, Suite 100
Boise, ID 83713
Telephone (208) 345-3333
Facsimile (208) 345-4461
Monte Neil Stewart
Craig G. Taylor
Thomas C. Morris
Daniel W. Bower
Gabriel M. Haws
Chad E. Bernards
Richard S. Bower
Ammon C. Taylor
May 6, 2014
Via CM/ECF Electronic Filing System
Molly C. Dwyer, Clerk of the Court
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Re: Sevcik v. Sandoval, Case No. 12-17668;
Appellee Coalition for the Protection of Marriage’s Rule 28(j) citation
of supplemental authority: Town of Greece v. Galloway, No. 12-696
(U.S. May 5, 2014), slip opinion attached
Dear Clerk:
Yesterday’s opinion of the Supreme Court in Town of Greece supports the
Coalition’s showing that Nevada’s man-woman definition of marriage is consistent
with any proper reading of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In upholding the town’s practice of beginning town council meetings with
prayer, the Court made several statements indicating that the First Amendment’s
Establishment Clause, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth
Amendment, should not be interpreted in a way that renders invalid a practice—
like prayer in public meetings—that was well established at the time the First and
Fourteenth Amendments were adopted. For example, referring to the Court’s
earlier decision in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983), the Court said:
Marsh stands for the proposition that it is not necessary to define the
precise boundary of the Establishment Clause where history shows
that the specific practice is permitted. Any test the Court adopts must
acknowledge a practice that was accepted by the Framers and has
withstood the critical scrutiny of time and political change.
Slip Op. at 8. So too here: Any “test the Court adopts” for determining Fourteenth
Amendment limitations on a State’s authority to define marriage ought likewise
Case: 12-17668 05/06/2014 ID: 9084929 DktEntry: 201-1 Page: 1 of 2
Ninth Circuit Clerk
May 6, 2014
Page 2
respect “a practice”—namely, the man-woman definition of marriage—that was
universally “accepted by the Framers” of the Fourteenth Amendment. See
Coalition Answering Br. at 88-89, 99-100 (Dkt. No. 110-3).
Also, speaking of the “purpose and effect” of the town council prayer in
Town of Greece, the Court went on to hold that “[t]he inclusion of a brief,
ceremonial prayer as part of a larger exercise in civic recognition suggests that its
purpose and effect are to acknowledge religious leaders and the institutions they
represent, rather than to exclude or coerce nonbelievers.” Slip Op. at 23. So too
here: Nevada’s protection of the man-woman definition of marriage as part of “a
larger exercise” directed at maximizing the number of children raised by both a
mother and a father likewise shows that the “purpose and effect” of that definition
are not to harm gays and lesbians or their families. See Coalition Answering Br. at
34-48, 99-100.
Respectfully submitted,
___/s/___
Monte Neil Stewart
Counsel for Appellee Coalition for the
Protection of Marriage
Attachment
Case: 12-17668 05/06/2014 ID: 9084929 DktEntry: 201-1 Page: 2 of 2