Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive agriculture assets to make agriculture profit-making & sustainable Vol V

JANAKALYAN Shantinagar, R H Colony No.4 Sindhanur–584128 Raichur District

Karnataka, India www.jankalyan.in

email: [email protected]

Livelihood Improvement by

Leveraging NREGA funds to

create productive agriculture assets

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Supported a

Final Report Volume V

JANAKALYAN has initiated an innovative intervention with the support of Sir Dorabji Tata Trust in 17 villages of Sindhanur taluk to create productive agriculture assets by leveraging NREGA funds through community capacity building and complementing the efforts of government machineries

February 2010 – March 2011 5/4/2011

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives . 2

Final Report

Index

Chapter Particulars Page No.

Raichur District & NREGA at a glance 3 Journey of Janakalyan through NREGA 5 Problems of tail-end farmers and solutions through NREGA 6

Chapter I Progress during reporting period 1.1 Sensitization Campaign for 3 tiers PRI members 8 1.1.1 District Level Workshop 8 1.1.2 Taluk Level Workshop 8 1.1.3 Gram Panchayat Level Workshops 10 1.2 Empowering communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning

tools 11

1.2.1 Gram Sabha in villages 12 1.2.2 Situation Analysis 12 1.2.3 Micro Planning 14 1.3 Implementation of shelf of works to generate employment and create

productive agriculture assets through communities 17

1.3.1 Promote Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG) 19 1.3.2 Facilitation of asset building activities 22 1.3.3 Implement SRI 35 1.3.4 Implement LEISA with IIFS 37 1.3.5 Supplement income by growing High Yielding Varieties 38 1.3.6 Introduce Collective Purchase of inputs and sale of produces 42 Chapter II Learning from Field 2.1 Major Problems faced in implementing the activities 43 2.2 Solutions to the problems 45 2.3 How these could have been better implemented 46 2.4 Learning 47 Chapter III Action Plan 3.1 Plan of Action for next 3 years to make it a replicable model 50 3.2 Strategies to implement the program 52 3.3 Anticipated Problems 52 3.4 Strategies to ensure participation of all stakeholders 53

Additional Information from the field Annex 1 Gram Sabha Details 55 Annex 2 Situation Analysis Detail 56 Annex 3 List of WEG members 57 Annex 4 List of AIG members 66 Annex 5 NREGA shelf of work execution details 73 Annex 6 Vegetable cultivation details 85 Annex 7 List of Gram Panchayat members 89 Annex 8 Field Team 90

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur

Final Report (February 2010 – March 2011) .

3

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Raichur District & NREGA at a Glance

Raichur is the most backward (last ranked) district in Karnataka as per HDI and thus Government of India considered implementation of NREGA in the very first phase of 200 districts brought under the umbrella of this ambitious scheme in India. Fortunately, Government of Karnataka assigned the responsibility of preparing 5-year Perspective Plans of all 34 Gram Panchayats (281 out of 830 villages) in Sindhanur taluk of Raichur district in this first phase to Janakalyan. The demographic details about the district is provided in the table below-

Blocks Area

(S

q. K

m)

Male

Popu

latio

n

Fem

ale

Popu

latio

n

Tota

l Pop

ulat

ion

Rura

l Pop

ulat

ion

Urba

n Po

pulat

ion

SC P

opul

atio

n

ST P

opul

atio

n

No. o

f vill

ages

No. o

f GP

No o

f ho

useh

olds

Lite

racy

(Male

)

Lite

racy

(fem

ale)

Lite

racy

(Tot

al)

Deodurga 1508 112245 110212 222457 200463 21994 44349 74910 173 28 36709 51.73 27.20 39.56 Lingasugur 1948 162628 158414 321042 247478 73564 68412 51332 186 35 54074 66.28 36.27 51.39

Manvi 1791 166063 164656 330719 293106 37613 62239 77956 164 36 59904 54.79 30.71 42.78 Raichur 1541 220675 214705 435380 208976 226404 82649 52129 147 31 81205 66.28 45.45 56.05

Sindhanur 1598 180229 179935 360164 298902 61262 59630 46715 160 34 65763 65.46 37.81 51.56 Total 8386 841840 827922 1669762 1248925 420837 317279 303042 830 164 297655 62.02 36.84 49.54 % 50.42 49.58 74.80 33.70 19.00 18.15

Raichur district lies in the north-eastern part of the state and falls in ‘North Dry Agro climatic Zone’. It is 7th largest district in Karnataka and consists of 5 taluks. It is facing drought due to erratic rainfall for several years. It is predominantly agrarian with not many major / medium industrial units. The total geographical area is 6827 sq. km with 1.579% covered by forests. The district has 5 taluks with 830 inhabited villages; Population (2001 Census) is 16.70 lakh with 12.49 lakh in rural areas; average population density is 245 per sq. km. It is known for rice crop with a total area of 1.6 lakh ha under the crop. Sorghum and sunflower are other important crops. Raichur is last ranked district in the state mainly due to educational backwardness and health services and employment generation and industries as per the HDI.



The following tables provide the details about the block-wise data on job cards, demand for employment, employment provided, number of person-days of employment generated along with the details on families completed 100 days of works, disabled beneficiaries, land reform/ IAY beneficiaries, etc. The table also gives the caste-wise bifurcation on job cards as well as employment generated during the fiscal year 2009-10.

Employment generated during the financial year 2009-2010 (up to March 2010) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 a b c d

Cum

ulat

ive N

o. o

f HH

de

man

ded

empl

oym

ent

(Till

the r

epor

ting

mon

th)

Cum

ulat

ive N

o. o

f HH

prov

ided

empl

oym

ent

(Till

the r

epor

ting

mon

th)

No. o

f HH

work

ing

unde

r NRE

GA

du

ring

the r

epor

ting

mon

th

a b c d e

S.No

Bloc

k

Cumulative No. of HH issued job cards (Till the

reporting month) Cumulative Person-days generated

(Till the reporting month)

Cum

ulat

ive N

o. o

f HH

c om

plet

ed 10

0 day

s (T

ill th

e rep

ortin

g m

onth

)

No. o

f HH

which

are b

enef

iciar

y of

land

refo

rm/IA

Y

No. o

f Disa

bled

be

nefic

iary i

ndivi

duals

SCs STs Others Total SCs STs Others Total Women

1 DEVADURGA 5249 11846 17913 35008 34086 33247 4650 302903 737435 1121172 2161510 987932 2828 330 167 2 LINGSUGUR 5071 4025 22718 31814 29922 29320 4072 240619 218936 1513003 1972558 747893 1262 22 69 3 MANVI 9889 11498 27610 48997 46984 45240 1999 558997 584813 1537867 2681677 1114715 1535 673 1228 4 RAICHUR 5854 6114 15299 27267 24364 23830 2223 263144 263718 714982 1241844 567975 1089 157 163 5 SINDHNUR 6223 5538 19038 30799 40587 40002 1457 438814 391811 1429817 2260442 822719 3959 1377 111 Total 32286 39021 102578 173885 175943 171639 14401 1804477 2196713 6316841 10318031 4241234 10673 2559 1738 Percentage 19% 22% 59% 98% 17% 21% 61% 41% 6%

It is clear from the table that about 19% SC and 22% ST households have received the job cards which is proportionate to the total SC (19%) and ST (18%) population in the district. However, participation in works has slightly reduced to 17% for SC and 21% for ST and that for women is 41% as compared to men. The important aspect to be noted that only 6% families have completed 100 days of works during the reporting period. Similarly, the table below provides the information block-wise data on number of households demanded for job cards and the number of job cards issued; similarly, demand for employment vis-à-vis employment offered and provided to the families. One can also find the person-days of employment generated during the fiscal year 2009-10 and up to 30th June 2010 along with number of persons actually worked under NREGA.

Employment Generated during the Year 2009-2010 up to the Month of June 2010 State : KARNATAKA District : RAICHUR

Blocks

No. of Registered Job

Card Issued

Employment demanded

Employment offered Employment Provided No. of

filled Muster

Roll

No. of Families

Completed 100 days

On going works House

Hold Persons House Hold Persons House

Hold Persons House Hold Persons Person-

days DEVADURGA 37051 151869 35008 34086 140474 34086 140474 33247 136591 2161510 5328 2828 3136 LINGSUGUR 33096 122477 31814 29922 116217 29911 116177 29320 113357 1972558 3469 1262 2220 MANVI 50170 207489 48997 46984 213366 46984 213366 45240 204383 2681677 6707 1535 5244 RAICHUR 27869 101494 27267 24364 86835 24364 86835 23830 84801 1241844 2845 1089 1619 SINDHNUR 32568 107909 30799 40587 136077 40587 136077 40002 133491 2260442 5131 3959 2973 Grand Total 180754 691238 173885 175943 692969 175932 692929 171639 672623 10318031 23480 10673 15192




5

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Journey of Janakalyan through NREGA

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 has been considered across the globe as one of the best plan ever made by Indian planners; one can see the physical as well as financial progress on the government website exclusively meant for it. But the reality is something else remained as open-secret that nobody is ready to talk about. There are many questions that arise in one’s mind- Are the objectives set by it achieving? Are the benefits reaching to the real target groups? What are the practical problems in making it fruitful? What are the feelings of implementing authorities? What the newly elected Gram Panchayat members are expecting from NREGA? What the communities feel about this beautifully designed project? How the officers are making undue advantages from the project? And several other questions

are bothering everybody but remained unanswered. Efforts have been put to find answers to some of these questions while implementing the SDTT supported “Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive assets for the farming communities” project in 3 GP of Sindhanur taluk of Raichur district. This report is prepared at the end of the project period and documented the progress achieved during February 2010 to March 2011. Objectives of the project: With the support of SDTT, Janakalyan initiated an intervention in 3 GP of Sindhanur taluk to leverage NREGA funds for creation of productive assets to secure livelihoods of farming communities in February 2010. Objectives of this innovative intervention is to- a. To empower community skills to articulate their needs (issues), demand for deserved rights

under NREGA, prepare plan (using micro-planning tool) and lead its implementation to help themselves

b. To support community action to make effective use of NREGA funds for creation of irrigation and soil health improvement assets through community capacity building initiatives

c. To make agriculture profit-oriented to make the lives and livelihoods of communities Sustainable



Problems of tail-end farmers and Solutions through NREGA

Raichur is an agriculturally predominant district and almost 73% of the total working population is directly dependent on agriculture as their source of livelihoods. At the same time, the asset-base of the district is very poor, especially the productive assets required to improve the agricultural productivity. The following table gives some basic information about the dependency of the district on agriculture for their livelihoods.

AGRICULTURE DEPENDENCY Major Occupations / livelihood Options of the People of Raichur District

Non-working

population

Working Population Total Population Cultivator Agricultural

laborers Household activities

Other Services

937000 206680 328491 14473 183118 1669762 56% 28% 45% 2% 25%

On one hand, the livelihood analysis of demographic data depicts that about 45% of total population of Raichur is agricultural wage-earners, who needs additional employment (1st objective of NREGA) while another 28% of the population is cultivators, who needs the durable and productive agricultural assets to secure their livelihoods (2nd objective of NREGA). On the other hand, the NREG Act, 2005 set the dual objectives to address both these issues of providing additional employment as well as creating durable productive assets using the same amount of funds as under- 1. To provide livelihood security to the households in rural areas by providing not less than 100 (one

hundred) days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household, whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled and manual work.

2. Creation of durable assets and strengthening the livelihood resource base of rural poor. This means, a penny spent shall bring double benefits to the people for whom the scheme is meant for. The wage-earners shall get employment while the farmers shall get the durable productive assets to improve agriculture productivity. However, the tail end farmers have some peculiar problems to optimize their productivity. These problems are of special cadre and thus need special attention to resolve. To state some of these problems are- 1. Inadequate Irrigation water: Hardly 20% of the land is irrigated and 15% land is used intensively (more than

one crop per year) which is very bad in the present context (after green revolution). 2. Salinity & alkalinity: About 10-20% of the land in the low-lying areas is saline & alkaline, where nothing can be

grown. Choking of drainage line & use of water from the drainage lines (which drains the water from upper reach farms – leached out water) are the major reasons for salinity & alkalinity.

3. Chemical-heavy farming leading to degraded soil fertility and thus least productivity: Overdoses of chemicals left the residues in the soil degrading the soil fertility over a period of time. Therefore, the productivity has gone down to any extent. Lack of biomass and litters in the farms has also contributed to soil degradation.

4. Undeveloped land: There is still lot of lands belonging to the bottom strata of the society which have not been developed so far.

5. Lack of connectivity: Physical connectivity of the land to the residential areas is very poor causing problem for timely transportation of inputs (causing reduction in yield) as well as produces (causing post harvest losses). Further, the farmer cannot even think of going for high-income crops which are perishable in nature.




7

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Now, if we look at the priorities of NREGA as stated below, all these above 5 problems of tail end farmers could easily be addressed by NREGA. The focus of the Scheme shall be on the following works in their order of priority: 1. Water conservation and water harvesting. 2. Drought proofing (including afforestation and tree plantation). 3. Irrigation canals, including micro and minor irrigation works. 4. Provision of irrigation facility to land owned by households belonging to the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes or to land of beneficiaries of land reforms or that of the beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojana of the Government of India program

5. Renovation of traditional water bodies including de-silting of tanks. 6. Land development 7. Flood control and protection works, including drainage in waterlogged areas. 8. Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access. 9. Any other work, which may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with the State

Government. In order to ensure that the adequate investments under Employment Guarantee Scheme are channelized for plantation programs, a minimum of 20% of the value of works taken up in a Village shall be on plantation program. Roads can be taken up as last priority not exceeding 10% of the value of all the works.

A comparative statement below shows how the problems of tail end farmers could be addressed by NREGA priorities. Sl. No.

Problems of Tail end farmers NREGA priorities which can address the issues of tail end problems

1 Inadequate irrigation water Water conservation and water harvesting (Priority-1) and Provision of irrigation facility (Priority-4): By excavating farmponds to store rainwater during rainy season and use for life-saving irrigation during peak season

2 Salinity and alkalinity Drainage in waterlogged areas (Priority-7): Sub-surface drainage as well as open drainage and widening / deepening of natural drainage canal could resolve this problem

3 Chemical-heavy farming leading to degraded soil fertility and thus least productivity

Drought proofing including afforestation and tree plantation (Priority-2): By increasing biomass contents of the soil, the fertility could be improved.

4 Undeveloped land Land Development (Priority-6): Develop all undeveloped land using NREGA funds for the poor farmers

5 Lack of connectivity Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access (Priority-8): Make/repair the connecting roads to the land to transport the inputs as well as produces to make agriculture profit-making

The above table clearly depicts that NREGA could be a boon to the tail end farmers, especially for the farmers of this part of the country, provided the scheme is implemented in its true spirit. What is happening in reality is something different and in this context, Janakalyan initiated this intervention with a hope to sensitize the PRI members, government officers and communities to make its best use.



Part I Progress Achieved

(February 2010 – March 2011) This document is prepared at the end of the project period and documented the efforts of Janakalyan through NREGA (February 2010 to March 2011). Efforts have been made to report as per the budget line items from the approved program list in the subsequent sections of the report. 1.1 Sensitization Campaign for 3 tiers PRI members:

It is an important activity in order to make the program successful; unless and until the implementing authorities are convinced about the importance of these asset-building activities, it would become extremely difficult. Therefore, utmost care is taken to implement these set of activities and many rounds of scheduling and rescheduling is being done to see to it that, the team does not complete the activities for the sake of completing these tasks and achieving the target. Yet, there are few activities which have been postponed time and again for the want of suitable time so that it bears desired impacts on the target groups for whom the activities are planned for and finally completed all the planned tasks with an additional time of 2 months.

1.1.1 District Level Workshop: This was planned to be the first activity in the sequence but due to

several reasons, it has remained as an incomplete activity, though planned several times during the reporting period. The major reasons are illustrated below- Ear-end Target: The project was launched in February 2010 and all the district, block and village

level officers including CEO, PD, DS etc were busy with achieving the March-end targets of exhausting their available budgets and thus they remained engaged throughout February, March and April 2010.

Election Code of Conduct: Soon after completing the ear-ending target achieving activities, government declared election code of conduct and suspended all the activities. All the officers become busy with election process and engaged themselves until end of election process.

Therefore, the sensitization workshop for these officers is kept on postponing and finally the strategy was changed to meet each of them individually to orient and convince them about the complementary approach to make NREGA provisions used for productive agriculture assets.

1.1.2 Taluk Level Workshop: Several efforts were initiated to convene the taluk level workshop during the year but due to the same reasons as stated above, this task also remained incomplete till mid-year; however, with similar strategies, we could took the PRI members and officers into confidence in addition to the local MLA. But in the month of February 2011, a big event was organized at Janakalyan Samarthya Soudha on 17th February 2011 wherein the Executive Officer, Taluka Panchayat participated along with all his line departments and PRI members. More than 300 farmers from the project villages also participated in the program. A Government-Community Interface was created between the officers and farmers and there were huge number of questions posed to the PRI members as well as government officers. Finally, the EO had to agree to incorporate the asset building activities in the Annual Action Plan. Orientation to the newly elected PRI members: It was planned to expose the Gram Panchayat members who really want to do some good works under NREGA to few Gram Panchayats where




9

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

extraordinary works have been done by the GP members with cooperation of communities; but lately realized that there is hardly any such GP where productive agriculture assets have been created by PRI members initiative. However, several training has been conducted during the quarter in order to keep their tempo on. The details are furnished in the table below-

Sl. No

Gram Panchayat GP members of these villages Dates of Training

No of participants

1. ALABANUR Alabanur, Belagurki, Kannari, Maladinni Camp, R.B. Camp 27-8-2010 29 2 BADARLI Haretanur, Gonniganur, Valabellary, Hedaginal, Badarli,

Timmapura, R.H.No-5, Ginaivar 2-9-2010 16

3 MADASIRWAR Budihal, Madasirwar, Udbal EJ, Gomarci 5-9-2010 14

Orientation to government staffs at various levels: Government officials play an important role in making the program successful & therefore several rounds of training and orientation has been conducted to take the government officers into confidence. Several rounds of one-to-one interactions have also been done during the quarter.

Sl. No GP Level Venue Dates of

Training 1. Secretary & PDO Taluk Panchayat

Sindhanur 4-10-2010

2. JE, AE, AEE, EO & CEO & other staff responsible for NREGA implementation

Zilla Panchayat Raichur 4-10-2010 & 16-10-2010

One-to-One interactions Sl. No.

Meeting with Janakalyan staff Date of

meeting Outcomes

3 MLA Basavarajaiah & Pranab Bala

7-9-2010 & 23-9-2010

Agreed to resolve the problems shortly and Discuss the matter calling the taluka level staff & ensure works are started soon.

4 CEO Basavarajaiah & Pranab Bala

3-9-2010 & 5-9-2010

Told about pressure coming from people and from their Principal secretary, shown the staff allocation status & promised to start work urgent.

5 PD Basavaraj & Ms.Manjushree

8-10-2010 & 9-11-10

Agreed to start work & shown the budget copy

6 EO Basavarajaiah Pranab & Ms.Manjushree

3-11-2010, 5-12-2010, 2-2-2011

Agreed to visit our GPs shortly along with PDO and start works. Resolve all problems.



Newly elected GP members’ training

1.1.3 Gram Panchayat Level Workshop: The newly elected Gram Panchayat members’ orientation

program was conducted on 27.6.2010 at Janakalyan Office wherein about 49 newly elected Gram Panchayat members from 17 villages of 3 Gram Panchayats participated in the orientation meeting. The day- long meeting introduced the salient features of NREGA followed by the issues of tail end farmers and how these could be addressed through the involvement of PRI members. The contents of the training in brief are listed below while the detailed power point presentation could be viewed following the link.

Major topics covered are- 1. Orientation on NREGA and its salient features:

a. Objectives of NREGA 2005 and its relevance to our present context. b. Five non-negotiable in execution of the Act c. Thirteen RIGHTs and Entitlements of the wage-earners and farmers provided under the

Act d. Procedure for registration and issue of job cards e. Procedure for application and allotment of works f. Procedure to claim for unemployment allowance g. Permitted TYPEs of works in their order of priority and how these could create durable

productive assets for farmers in addition to creating employment for the wage-earners. h. Planning of shelf of works and its approval as well as execution procedure with responsible

officers.

2. Orientation on the Project: at the end of the day, we have- a. established the fact that our communities are solely dependent on agriculture using the

government data and how provisions of NREGA could help us to improve our livelihood conditions.

b. analyzed the factors contributing to make agriculture loss-making in our context, discussed about the alternate options available and how provisions of NREGA could overcome all these factors with their active participation.

c. set the objectives of our intervention and defined the roles that each of the stakeholders (including PRI members) need to play in order to secure the livelihoods using best use of the NREGA provisions.

3. Way out and role of PRI: At the end of the day, the participants also agreed the following-

a. The PRI members including the Presidents/ Vice-presidents present in the workshop convinced that lack of political will among the elected representatives is the sole reason for present status of the scheme.




11

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

b. Though, all the members had their own reservation about the project, finally they agreed to

work as per our plan at least for year and if they get desired results / response, they would continue in future too.

c. Each of the present members then agreed to take up at least few asset-creating during the year as per our priorities and set a target for themselves.

Questions of GP members: All the members have same set of questions which were asked repeatedly during the orientation workshop; some of them are listed below- If you implement NREGA activities

through people, how about our percentage share?

The amount that we have already spent in getting elected as GP members, how do we recover the same?

If you don’t allow us to use machineries in executing the works, it would be difficult for us to recover our investment in next one year.

All these questions were answered and the newly elected GP members were requested that you have been elected for 5 years; use the 1st year for the cause of the communities and if the community does recognize your service, next 4 years you can recover your investment. Let’s invest this one year to make our GP as model GP in the state so that others recognize our efforts. The members were then convinced and finally each GP member agreed to take up at least 4-5 activities under our heads in the next one year.

1.2 Empowering communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning tools:

This set of activities is the most important activities in whole project and therefore due care is taken care while implementing these activities. Since, the orientation activities for the government functionaries and elected representatives were not possible in the 1st quarter of the program,

Newly elected GP members of Alabanur GP

Newly elected GP members of Badarli GP

Newly elected GP members of Madasirwar GP



community empowerment activities were completed during 1st quarter itself to facilitate asset building activities through people’s participation.

1.2.1 Gram Sabha in villages: Apart from the 1st set of gram sabha that were conducted to orient the communities about the project in the beginning of the project, the team has conducted many rounds of gram sabha in each of the project villages. These gram sabha were to discuss various issues arouse from time to time in implementing the project activities and come up with the solutions to the respective issues. Though, there are still issues in bringing the whole community together on this issue, but we have succeeded to create a small pressure group among the villagers. Subsequent rounds of gram sabha in the villages also discussed many issues related to NREGA and its implementation. Janakalyan team also created AIG (Agriculture Interest Groups) in these villages and WEG (Wage Earners Group) to create pressure groups for the government as well as PRI members. The details of these gram sabha are annexed to this report as Annex-I.

1.2.2 Situation Analysis: Situation analysis is an exercise done with the participating farmers to understand their own village scenario (especially the agriculture scenario) using participatory tools. An effort was put to understand the village situation and context in which we are intervening to make agriculture profit-making through NREGA support. The summary is furnished in Annex-II.

Gram Sabha




13

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Problems in growing crops in these villages: The Janakalyan team has also tried to understand the factors contributing failure of crop or bottlenecks in cultivating various crops in these villages through situation analysis exercise. Major among these are- 1. intermittent dry spells between 2 rains 2. lack of connectivity with the lands 3. inadequate irrigation water available for these farmers 4. over dozes of chemical fertilizers and pesticides has degraded soil fertility to any extent 5. salinity and alkalinity caused due to water logging condition of the soil 6. recent flood has broken the farm bunds, deposited silt and eroded the top fertile soil from the

land in the river banks 7. lack of proper marketing facility 8. inefficient functioning of Krishi Vigyan Kendra and Raita Sampark Kendra caused inadequate

percolation of information to the farmers 9. migration of laborers to the nearby cities in search of employment 10. lack of complete scientific & latest knowledge about any crop among the farmers

Whether NREGA can address these issues? Most of the above problems could be addressed, if the NREGA is implemented in a systematic manner. 1. drainage of waterlogged, saline and alkaline areas; 2. farm pond to harvest runoff and resolve irrigation issue; 3. de-silting of land, bunding, flood control measures, etc. to bring land to the original condition; 4. providing connecting road to the land 5. promotion of AIGs in the villages and making them aware about scientific know-how about the

crops 6. implementation of labor-oriented activities to bring migrated population back to the villages 7. sensitizing the newly elected PRI members to take up productive assets creating activities



1.2.3 Micro Planning: Micro-planning is an exercise to empower the communities to identify their issues

related to farming, preparing proposal in NREGA terms to get these issues resolved, approving it in the gram sabha and submitting these proposals to GP to get sanctioned under NREGA. Actual implementation of the project starts with micro-planning. The details of the micro-planning exercise completed during the reporting period are furnished in the table below-

Sl. No.

Name of the village Participants in the micro-planning exercise Number of works Male Female SC ST Opinion

Leaders GP

member Farmer Labors

1 Alabanur 56 - 5 10 10 2 30 18 40 2. Belagurki 41 02 10 9 2 3 20 25 78 3. Kannari 41 02 10 9 2 3 20 25 78 4. Maladinni Camp 20 06 - 07 2 1 17 17 40 5 Gonniganur 22 00 7 4 5 1 20 10 25 6 Valaballary 35 00 10 12 5 3 25 20 88 7 Hedaginal 96 00 35 20 8 3 50 60 144 8 Madasirwar 26 01 7 10 4 1 20 22 82 9 Udbhal 24 00 10 - 5 1 20 10 38 10 Budihal 41 03 25 4 6 - 35 20 90 11 Gomarsi 50 - 20 - 3 3 36 14 60 12 Ginivar 45 - 18 08 2 3 24 21 65 13 BR Camp 30 - 02 02 2 2 20 10 30 14 RH No5 50 - - - 5 3 30 20 40 15 Haretanur 40 - 20 10 2 2 20 20 50 16 Badarli 40 - 15 08 3 3 30 10 60 17 Timmapur 50 - 15 10 3 2 30 20 45

Process followed in conducting micro-planning: A day-long training to the employees was conducted to orient them how to do micro-planning in the villages. A set of formats were developed to identify various works to be taken up under NREGA in the villages and also a reporting format




15

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

for micro-plan report. The following methodology was adopted in each village to complete the micro-planning exercise.

Day 1

Meeting opinion leaders, PRI & SHG members, youths & others in village 8.00 - 10.00 General information collection – transect walk 10.00 - 16.00 Introduction of NREGA, our project and gram sabha 17.00 - 19.00 Planning for tomorrow 19.00 - 20.00 Selection of Agriculture interested people 08.00 - 09.00

Day 2

Social Map 07.00 - 10.00 Resource Map 10.00 - 12.00 FGD to identify the needs and classification 12.00 - 13.30 Estimated budget preparation 15.00 - 17.00 Draft action plan preparation 17.00 - 19.00 Approval of draft action plan in the gram sabha 19.00 - 21.00



Productive agriculture asset creating activities: The following table provides the information regarding the farmers those who wants productive agriculture assets out of NREGA funds-

Sl. No. Village Date of micro-

planning All Works

requested by villagers

Number of works identified Farm pond Drainage Plantation Flood

control Land Bund

1 Alabanur 22,23-04-10 80 3 33 4 28 10 2 Belagurki 24,25-04-10 82 54 4 6 16 7 3 Kannari 30,01-05-10 43 8 22 2 10 3 4 Maladinni Camp 26,27-04-10 28 1 27 2 - 2 5 R.B. Camp 29,30-04-10 18 2 6 7 - 4 6 Budihal 27,28-04-10 92 5 39 2 14 15 7 Madasirwar 25,26-04-10 107 2 41 2 22 4 8 Udbal EJ 20,21-04-10 44 5 10 8 13 1 9 Gomarsi - - - - - 10 Haretanur 02,03-05-10 41 17 07 17 8 - 11 Gonniganur 22,23-04-10 22 1 13 14 - 4 12 Valabellary 20,21-04-10 80 6 60 3 3 3 13 Hedaginal 18,19-04-10 123 13 100 10 30 3 14 Badarli 29,30-04-10 45 19 18 4 54 2 15 Timmapura 01,02-05-10 60 32 17 7 6 7 16 R.H.No-5 03,04-05-10 17 - 12 6 1 8 17 Ginaivar - - - - -

Major types of works: The major works identified by the team during the micro-planning exercise in the villages are furnished below- Sl. No.

Village Farm pond Drainage Plantation Flood control Road No Amtount No Amount No Amount No Amount Km Amount

1 Alabanur 3 150000 33 3000000 2000 800000 28 8000000 19 2280000

2 Belagurki 54 2700000 4 600000 600 24000 16 1024000 12 1680000

3 Kannari 8 384000 22 1800000 800 320000 10 1000000 6 720000

4 Maladinni Camp 1 48000 27 2100000 200 80000 - - 2 240000

5 R.B. Camp 2 96000 6 800000 1000 400000 - - 8 960000

6 Budihal 5 240000 39 3800000 300 120000 14 1600000 28 3360000

7 Madasirwar 2 96000 41 42000000 200 80000 22 2200000 9 1080000

8 Udbal EJ 5 240000 10 1200000 3000 1200000 13 1400000 1 300000

9 Gomarci - - - - -

10 Haretanur 17 816000 07 800000 4000 1600000 8 100000 -

11 Gonniganur 1 48000 13 1100000 700 280000 - 8 960000

12 Valabellary 6 288000 60 55000000 500 200000 3 500000 6 720000

13 Hedaginal 13 624000 100 80000000 1200 480000 30 10000000 7 840000

14 Badarli 19 912000 18 22000000 600 200000 54 15000000 4 480000

15 Timmapura 32 1536000 17 20000000 2000 800000 6 800000 14 1680000

16 R.H.No-5 - 12 12000000 800 320000 1 80000 16 1920000

17 Ginivar - - - - - Total 168 8178000 409 246200000 17900 6904000 205 41704000 28 17220000

There was huge demand for the asset-creating activities by the farmers when they realized this is the only scheme which can really secure their livelihoods. It was really difficult by Janakalyan team




17

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

to manage the demands of the farmers. The work estimates crossed few millions while the provision per fiscal year cannot cross hundred thousands rupees. Reactions of elected representatives: Though the communities expressed their happiness to our project but the PRI members are not so happy. However, we could mobilize their supports in some of the villages; most of them participated because their period is over and they are not sure that they will again get elected in the present election.

1.3 Implementation of shelf of works to generate employment and create productive agriculture

assets through communities: Achievement of the project objectives could be possible only with this set of activities. While most of the planning and preparatory activities were completed in 1st and 2nd quarters of the project period, the 3rd quarter was completely dedicated for execution NREGA shelf of works and demonstration of farm based activities. The team had an apprehension that the agricultural operations and monsoon might come in their way in execution of these shelf of activities while never calculated the big hurdle that government might suspend implementation of all NREGA activities during 3rd quarter.



Plan of action to create productive agriculture assets: The micro plans prepared by the Janakalyan team with the communities was reorganized as per the requirement of the government in the prescribed format and got the approval of the newly elected Gram Panchayat members and then placed before the government for approval. The Taluk (Intermediate) Panchayat has also recommended this shelf of works to District Panchayat and the District Panchayat has withhold its approval citing a reason that the Annual Action Plan had already been approved by the Government; however, at the end of the year, if any of the activities form the approved lists is dropped, then these can be taken up. Further, the CEO also suggested that many of these activities proposed in our microplans have also are common in the government approved list, which can be implemented immediately with Janakalyan cooperation. CEO told that payment for many of the works completed last year to mitigate flood affects were pending due to lack of funds and also incomplete NMR; all such works have been included in the current Annual Action Plan which have been approved and have been uploaded in MIS.

Preparation at Higher level: in order to execute the shelf of works several efforts are made throughout the project period to convince the government officers at GP, TP and ZP levels that our intervention is to create productive assets for the farmers by leveraging funds from NREGA. The workshops at GP, TP and ZP levels yielded no results. The action plan approved by the government for 3 GP of our operational area could be summarized as presented in the table.

Though, these works were approved by government for 2010-11, with all our efforts and coordination with the executing authorities at Gram Panchayat and Intermediate Panchayat, we failed to take up a single work under NREGA till December 2010. The communities were on toes but we failed to meet their expectations too. The major reasons cited by the government officer are- 1) During the last (2009-10) year flood, lot of activities have been executed in all the Gram

Panchayat of Raichur district which were not approved in last year Action Plan (beyond the approved budget by the Government of India); these activities have been officially approved during current year action plan and decided to make payment to the old GP Members during the current financial year while the newly elected GP members want to take up new works. Therefore, they are not taking up any work during the current but entering last year figures in the website.

2) The new GP members want to implement all the approved works as per the action plan while the old GP members, since they have invested in these works want their payment reimbursed

Sl. No. Work approved as per NREGA priorities Budget Approved for 2010-11

Alabanur Badarli Madasirwar Total 1 Water conservation and water harvesting 12.00 0.00 22.80 34.80 2 Drought proofing (including afforestation and tree plantation) 25.15 11.00 19.44 55.59 3 Irrigation canals including micro and minor irrigation works 00.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 4 Provision of irrigation facility to SC/ST/IAY beneficiaries 10.50 0.00 0.00 10.50 5 Renovation of traditional water bodies including de-silting of tanks 19.80 17.00 0.00 36.80 6 Land development 01.20 11.00 13.60 25.80 7 Flood control & protection works including drainage in waterlogged areas 31.00 43.00 18.40 92.40 8 Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access 20.10 66.00 19.50 105.60 Grand Total 125.75 154.00 93.74 373.49

Sl. No.

Name of Gram Panchayat

Budget Approved (in Lakh)

1 Alabanur 125.75 2 Badarli 154.00 3 Madsirwar 93.74

Total 373.49




19

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

by the officers. Both the groups are right as well as wrong because most of the works have not been implemented by the old members but are claiming for payment, thus the old members are at fault; similarly, some of the works have been implemented but was not paid and hence the new members are at fault. In this fight, the labor groups are the sufferers.

3) The conflict between old and new GP members is a problem difficult to resolve. One of the reasons is that most of the works which the old GP members are claiming for payment are either incomplete or not executed at all while there are some genuine cases also. The new GP members want to conduct a systematic scrutiny and then make payment to the genuine works.

4) Election code of conduct was cited as the reason till last quarter while now their statement has changed.

This problem exists not only in our project area but in all 164 GPs of Raichur districts. In fact the situation is too worst in few other GPs. Several rounds of public hearing and people protests at taluk and district level has been conducted by NGOs and people institutions.

1.3.1 Promote Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG): In order to execute the shelf of works systematically, we planned to promote AIGs in each of the project villages. The execution plan at the community level was modified as per the contexts arouse from time to time as under- 1) AIG: Initially it was planned that the work would be executed in the leadership of AIG and thus

an AIG in each village was promoted with the farmers (who shall create productive assets in their farms), wage-earners who must get 100 days of work from the NREGA activities. The information about these AIGs has already been provided in previous volumes of our reports. Several rounds of capacity building interventions have been done for their empowerment in all respects of NREGA. The focus was on complementary approach.

2) WEG: When we realized that the complementary approach might not yield expected results during the year, the team decided to form Wage Earners Group (WEG) involving 50 wage-earners from each village to create pressure groups for the government. About 9 such WEG has been promoted in 9 out of 17 villages. All the members of these WEG have been made aware about various aspects like job rights, benefits available under NREGA, roles of various stakeholders under NREGA and the Act itself through meetings, awareness camps and trainings. Pamphlets regarding NREGA and the list of works already approved in all the 3 GPs

WEG Meeting



in our project area along with budget details are also shared with these WEG members to provide clear knowledge, information and also to create demand for works. Some of these WEG has already submitted their job requests to respective GP.

3) Job Cards: In the month of August 2010, the government declared that all job cards registered

till 31.3.2010 as null and void and as a consequence the bank accounts and all other related documents became useless. The reason cited by the government was that these job cards were made by GP members / staffs and therefore the families have never engaged themselves in NREGA works till 31.3.2010. Hence, to estimate real demand for NREGA works, government invited community to register themselves for job cards; they deleted registrations of all job cards and bank account, etc. from MIS. Therefore, Janakalyan team had to spent maximum time to provide hand holding support to the communities for registration of labors for job cards, open bank accounts, etc. because, without this basic ground work, labor groups can not demand for the jobs from GPs under NREGA. The interesting point to be noted here is that the job enrollment movement was supported by PRI members as well as GP officials because it complements their target achievement. Following is the data regarding new job card registration-

Sl. No. Villages No. of Registered SCs STs Others Male Female HH Persons HH Persons HH Persons HH Persons 1 ALBANOOR 459 1173 78 195 58 146 323 832 622 551 2 BELGURKI 360 1164 106 346 109 360 145 458 562 602 3 GONNIGNOOR 119 297 4 10 14 39 101 248 167 130 4 KHANNARI 206 569 18 45 31 88 157 436 290 279 5 MALDINNI 49 118 2 4 12 29 35 85 61 57

Total: 1193 3321 208 600 224 662 761 2059 1702 1619 6 BADARLI 453 1809 34 140 220 860 199 809 915 894 7 GINIWAR 638 2287 71 249 33 101 534 1937 1131 1156 8 HARATNUR 728 2092 29 97 256 861 443 1134 1100 992 9 HEDAGINAL 364 1756 124 508 69 360 171 888 869 887

10 TIMMAPUR 330 1416 52 219 85 387 193 810 689 727 11 VALA BALLARY 404 1840 34 166 76 320 294 1354 928 912

Total: 2917 11200 344 1379 739 2889 1834 6932 5632 5568 12 BUDIHAL 492 1494 75 215 25 67 392 1212 740 754 13 GOMARSI 373 1048 50 123 0 0 323 925 573 475 14 KAGGAL (D) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 MADA SIRWAR 408 1141 97 286 7 21 304 834 604 537 16 UDBAL (J) 151 416 36 107 0 0 115 309 213 203

Total: 1424 4099 258 731 32 88 1134 3280 2130 1969 GRAN TOTAL 5534 18620 810 2710 995 3639 3729 12271 9464 9156




21

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Strengthening AIG and preparing them to execute the planned activities: To empower the AIG members on their rights and entitlements, several rounds of meeting and trainings are conducted during the reporting period; in addition, the team has also conducted in-house as well as out door technical training for the participating farmers. The details are presented in the table below- Sl. No. Name of the AIG Village Dates of Meeting for each AIG Date of Training

1 Nandi Basava Krishi Samiti Alabanur 06-08-10 20-08-10 10-09-10 4-10-2010 2 Sri Devi Krishi Samiti Belagurki 07-08-10 21-08-10 11-09-10 4-10-2010 3 Sri Rama Krishi Samiti Kannari 09-08-10 22-08-10 12-09-10 4-10-2010 4 Sri Maruthi Krishi Samithi Maladinni Camp 10-08-10 23-08-10 13-09-10 4-10-2010 5 Sri Gajanana Krishi Samithi R.B. Camp 11-08-10 24-08-10 14-09-10 4-10-2010 6 Sri Nagalinga Krishi Samiti Budihal 06-08-10 20-08-10 10-09-10 5-10-2010 7 Netravathi Krishi Samithi Madasirwar 07-08-10 21-08-10 11-09-10 5-10-2010 8 Sri Basava Krishi Samiti Udbal EJ 09-08-10 22-08-10 12-09-10 5-10-2010 9 Sri Someshwara Krishi Samiti Gomarci 10-08-10 23-08-10 13-09-10 5-10-2010 10 Sangamanatha Krishi Samiti Haretanur 06-08-10 20-08-10 10-09-10 6-10-2010 11 Sri Maruthi Krishi Samithi Gonniganur 07-08-10 21-08-10 11-09-10 6-10-2010 12 Channa Basava Krishi Samiti Valabellary 09-08-10 22-08-10 12-09-10 6-10-2010 13 Tunga Bhadra Krishi Samiti Hedaginal 10-08-10 23-08-10 13-09-10 7-10-2010 14 Sri Ayyappa Krishi Samiti Badarli 11-08-10 24-08-10 14-09-10 7-10-2010 15 Sri Shakthi Krishi Samiti Timmapura 12-08-10 25-08-10 15-09-10 7-10-2010 16 Sri Durga Krishi Samiti R.H.No-5 13-08-10 26-08-10 16-09-10 6-10-2010 17 Hasiru Krishi Samiti Ginaivar 14-08-10 27-08-10 17-09-10 7-10-2010

In addition to the AIGs, the team has also promoted Wage Earners (labor) Groups (WEG) in 9 out of these 17 villages (meetings held but group yet to be formed in other villages); these labor groups were used as a tool to fight against the government as the complementary approach did not yield any results. The details of these labor groups are furnished in the table below and the list of members (group wise) is furnished in annexure-III. Sl. No. Village # of groups Total Members Date of formation # of meetings

Male Female Total 1 Alabanur 2 20 30 50 14-9-2010 2 2 Belagurki 1 23 27 50 20-9-2010 2 3 Kannari 16-9-2010 3 4 Maladinni Camp 1 17 15 35 23-10-2010 1 5 R.B. Camp 17-10-2010 1 6 Budihal 17-9-2010 2 7 Madasirwar 1 7 2 9 14-9-2010 2 8 Udbal EJ 1 0 26 26 23-9-2010 3 9 Gomarci 1 16 14 30 24-9-2010 2

10 Haretanur 1 25 25 50 19-9-2010 2 11 Gonniganur 1 29 21 50 15-10-2010 1 12 Valabellary 6-10-2010 1 13 Hedaginal 12-9-2010 4 14 Badarli 2 22 28 50 2-10-2010 2 15 Timmapura 4-10-2010 1 16 R.H.No-5 11-10-2010 1 17 Ginivar 27-9-2010 2

Thus, we have an additional force in each of these villages as pressure group for the government; both AIG and WEG would put pressure on the executing authorities for initiating work execution and provide employment.



1.3.2 Facilitation of asset building activities:

As stated in the previous volumes of Quarterly Progress Reports that the project commenced in February 2010 and completed 14 months by now. The total project period is shown below for your reference-

Feb 2010

Mar 2010

Apr 2010

May 2010

Jun 2010

July 2010 Aug 2010

Sep 2010

Oct 2010

Nov 2010

Dec 2010

Jan 2011

Feb 2011

Mar 2011

Ground works like promotion

of AIG, microplan to identify the

needs

GP election Code of Conduct; no

developmental work implementation: ALL

WORK EXECUTION SUSPENDED

THROUGHOUT KARNATAKA

NREGA implementatio

n system changed:

recruitment of PDOs in place of Secretary

Conflict of old and new GP members

regarding work executed during

2009-10; suspended all

new work execution

EXECUTION OF NREGA SHELF OF WORKS

TP/ZP election Code of conduct;

SUSPENEDE ALL WORK EXECUTION

EXECUTION OF NREGA SHELF OF WORKS

GP election: 8.5.2010

President/VP election: 24.6.2010

TP/ZP election: 26.12.2010 President election: Jan 2011

Effectively we had only 4 months (October-November 2010 and again February-March 2011) for execution of shelf of works approved by government for 2010-11 as clear from the above table. The major reasons- 1) February- March: The ground works were carried out to form AIG, prepare microplans to

assess the needs of the communities. 2) April-June: Gram Panchayat election announced till election of GP President and Vice-

president: election code of conduct and hence suspended all works. 3) July: Government announced new system to replace Secretaries by PDO (Panchayat

Development Officers) in each Gram Panchayat; due to handing-taking over the charges by newly recruited PDOs, no work execution took place.

4) August-September: The old GP members, who had lot of works in February-March in additional budget as flood measures but could claim payment in April due to announcement of election, submitted their claims. But the newly elected GP body declined their payment alleging that these works were either not executed or partially executed by the old GP members. The conflict was in whole Karnataka state and took lot of time to resolve the issue by the intervention of state level bureaucrats and finally resolved in September end.

5) October- November: Execution of approved shelf of works initiated and completed few works as furnished in the subsequent sections of the report.

6) December- January: The Intermediate and District Panchayat election announced and thus execution of works suspended due to election code of conduct again.

Despite all these hurdles, the team could achieve most of the agreed tasks and the details are provided in the subsequent sections of the report. Budget Approved: Total approved budget of all 3 Gram Panchayat put together is Rs.3,75,48,800 while that for 4 asset-creating works is Rs.2,75,08,800 whereas our target is only Rs.2,02,50,000. Therefore, we were pretty sure of accomplishing our target. The highest budget is approved for Badarli Gram Panchayat

Earmarked Budget for different categories of works Sector Alabanur Badarli Madasirwar

Tree Plantation 2515000 1100000 1943800 Connecting roads 2010000 6600000 1950000 Land Development 120000 1100000 1360000 Water harvesting 4230000 2300000 2280000 Other Works 3800000 4300000 1940000

Total Budget 12675000 15400000 9473800




23

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

(Rs.1,54,00,000) followed by Alabanur GP (Rs.1,26,75,000) and lowest is for Madasirwar GP (Rs.94,73,800). The budget approved by the government for the year 2010-11 is grouped in 5 categories for our reporting convenience; 4 sectors representing the needs of the farmers to create productive agriculture assets and all other priorities of NREGA are grouped as ‘other works’. The maximum budget is earmarked for tree plantation in Alabanur GP, approach roads in Badarli GP, Land development in Madasirwar GP and water harvesting structures in Alabanur GP. The least fund is earmarked for tree plantation in Badarli GP, approach roads in Madasirwar GP, land development in Alabanur GP and water harvesting in Madasirwar GP.

GP wise work allocation: The allocation of works in all these 3 Gram Panchayat of Sindhanur taluk are furnished in the table above and discussed as under. Alabanur: Maximum funds is earmarked for water harvesting structures (Rs.42,30,000)

followed by tree plantation (Rs.25,15,000) and connecting road (Rs.20,10,000) and the least investment is for land development activities. About Rs.38,00,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA.

Badarli: Similarly for Badarli GP, the maximum funds is earmarked for connecting road (Rs.66,00,000) followed by water harvesting structures (Rs.23,00,000) and Rs.11,00,000 each for land development and tree planning activities. About Rs.43,00,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA.

Madasirwar: For Madasirwar GP, the maximum funds is earmarked for water harvesting structures (Rs.22,80,000) followed by connecting roads (Rs.19,50,000) and Rs.19,43,800 for tree planning while Rs.13,60,000 for land development activities. About Rs.19,40,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA.

Completed Works: With an additional time of 2 months (February-March 2011), Janakalyan team could complete almost all agreed tasks by mobilizing the communities; due to several reasons as stated above, the team failed to complete all the agreed tasks within the project period and thus sought an extension for 2 months (February-March 2011). The team is thankful to SDTT for providing an additional time to complete all the agreed tasks without any additional funding



support. The summary of the completed shelf of works are tabulated below while details are annexed to this report in Annex-V.

Summary of Works Completed under different target areas as per our commitment Sl. No Categories Alabanur

Rs. Badarli

Rs. Madsirwar

Rs. Total Rs.

I Completed Works A Tree Plantation 0 0 0 0 B Connecting roads 1710000 6350000 1650000 9710000 C Land Development 10000 1100000 1140000 2250000 D Water harvesting 2000000 2300000 2280000 6580000

Sub total - Completed works 3720000 9750000 5070000 18540000

II To be completed by end of the project A Tree Plantation 2515000 1100000 1943800 5558800

B Connecting roads 300000 250000 300000 850000 C Land Development 110000 0 220000 330000 D Water harvesting 2230000 0 0 2230000

Sub total - to be completed works 5155000 1350000 2463800 8968800

III Other works (not related to Janakalyan target)

1 Completed works 2800000 4300000 1440000 8540000 2 To be completed 1000000 0 500000 1500000

Sub total - Other works 3800000 4300000 1940000 10040000

GRAND TOTAL - ALL WORKS 12675000 15400000 9473800 37548800

The work-wise details are attached in worksheets as Annex V to this report




25

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



From the above table, it is clear that about Rs.1,85,40,000/- (91.56%) of the total target of Rs.2,02,50,000/- is accomplished despite all these hurdles during the project period. Though, we must agree that Janakalyan team could not involve physically in implementing all these works as many parallel work execution took place in each GP while we have only 1 GPO per GP; however, the planning was done by Janakalyan and the AIG / WEG members participated in these works, wherever our staff failed to make it. Many works have been implemented by direct supervision of our GPO in collaboration with GP members.

Analysis of the works taken up under NREGA in 2010-11: It is clear from the following table that out of total works executed during the year under NREGA, more than 68% works are to create productive agriculture assets (water harvesting, land development, plantation and connecting roads) proposed by Janakalyan while rest 32% is for other works. Similarly, from the works those are approved by government and would be executed, the major share (about 86%) is again to create productive agriculture assets while only 14% would be related to other works.




27

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Analysis of the works keeping total budget of all 3 GP as the base during 2011

Sl. No. Categories Alabanur

Rs. Badarli

Rs. Madsirwar

Rs. Total Rs.

I Completed Works A Tree Plantation 0% 0% 0% 0% B Connecting roads 26% 45% 25% 36% C Land Development 0% 8% 18% 8% D Water harvesting 31% 16% 35% 24%

Sub total - Completed works 57% 69% 78% 68%

II To be completed by end of the project period A Tree Plantation 41% 81% 66% 53%

B Connecting roads 5% 19% 10% 8% C Land Development 2% 0% 7% 3% D Water harvesting 36% 0% 0% 21%

Sub total - to be completed works 84% 100% 83% 86%

TOTAL - JANAKALYAN WORKS 70% 72% 80% 73%

III Other works of GP (not related to Janakalyan target) 1 Completed works 43% 31% 22% 32%

2 To be completed 16% 0% 17% 14%

Sub total - Other thank Janakalyan works 30% 28% 20% 27%

Similarly, the above table depicts that only 27% of the total GP budget is earmarked for other works while 73% of the works are approved to create productive agriculture assets. Detailed study shows that about 80% of total approved budget is earmarked for asset building activities in Madsirwar while that in Badarli is 72% and in Alabanur is 70%.

Analysis of the works for each GP: Similarly, if we analyze the works for each GP, we find that maximum works have been implemented in Badarli GP (63%) followed by Madsirwar (54%) and least is in Alabanur (29%); the total works completed so far in these 3 GPs for creating the productive agriculture assets is 49% while for other works is only 23%.



Analysis of the works keeping total GP budget as the base during 2011 Sl. No. Categories Alabanur

Rs. Badarli

Rs. Madsirwar

Rs. Total Rs.

I Completed Works A Tree Plantation 0% 0% 0% 0% B Connecting roads 13% 41% 17% 26% C Land Development 0% 7% 12% 6% D Water harvesting 16% 15% 24% 18% Sub total - Completed works 29% 63% 54% 49% II To be completed by end of the project period A Tree Plantation 20% 7% 21% 15% B Connecting roads 2% 2% 3% 2% C Land Development 1% 0% 2% 1% D Water harvesting 18% 0% 0% 6% Sub total - to be completed works 41% 9% 26% 24%

III Other works of GP (not related to Janakalyan target)

1 Completed works 22% 28% 15% 23% 2 To be completed 8% 0% 5% 4% Sub total - Other works 30% 28% 20% 27%

The maximum works undertaken for land development activities is in Madsirwar GP (12% of their completed works), for water harvesting activities is in Madsirwar GP (24% of their completed




29

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

works) and for connecting road is in Badarli GP (41% of their completed works). However, out of the completed works of all 3 GPs, the highest investment has gone for connecting roads (26%) followed by water harvesting structures (18%) and least is for land development (6%). Tree plantation has remained zero because the work execution started after the monsoon and thus still none of the works have yet been taken up under this category; however, as per the official records, all these activities have been completed and payment has been made.

As discussed in the earlier paragraphs, Janakalyan has identified 4 areas of productive agriculture asset creation by leveraging funds from NREGA. The following figure depicts that, tree plantation has not been taken up at all (0%) as it is a seasonal intervention but the



period when this activity shall have been taken up (July-Sep) was spent in the conflict between the old and new GP members. It is also clear from the figure that maximum investment has gone into approach road from the village to the farms in all the 3 GPs. Water harvesting structures have also been created but relatively less than other works while investment for land development is least among all 4 components.

Works yet to be executed: If we analyze the works that are already approved and remained incomplete, we find maximum investment would be for tree plantation followed by water harvesting structure and then connecting roads while land development would find least investment.




31

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



GP-wise work execution: The GP-wise execution could be analyzed using the following pie charts. It is clear from all the 3 GPs that maximum investment has gone into connecting roads followed by water harvesting structures.

Conclusion: To conclude the above discussion one can say that, total commitment of Janakalyan during the project period was about Rs.2,02,50,000/- while we have already accomplished Rs.1,85,40,000/- (91.56%) despite several hurdles during the reporting period. The team is very happy with the achievements during the reporting period despite all these hurdles but has learnt lots of lessons from experiences / hurdles, which shall be our assets for the future period of intervention. Moreover, all the elections starting from lower tier of PRI to District PRI, MLA/MP are completed during the year and therefore we will not face any such difficulties in the next 3 years. Therefore, keeping the learning in mind, we are sure to do more good works to create productive agricultural assets for the farmers of the region and come up with a replicable model to leverage NREGA funds for the benefits of the farming communities.

Major problems encountered in executing planned works: Execution of approved NREGA works by Janakalyan team is not an easy task in the present environment and systems adopted by the government in implementation of the activities. The elected representatives as well as government machineries have their own stakes in execution of these shelves of works and




33

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

therefore don’t entertain interference by any external persons/institutions like ours. Some of the problems we have faced while executing these sets of shelves of works under NREGA are – The communities themselves are not interested to get the works done in their field (especially

the individual benefits like water harvesting structure, land development works or tree plantation) but simply want the amount paid to them (whatever amount they get after paying the percentage of share to all persons associated in finalizing the bills and getting it released).

The newly elected PRI members, who have invested lot of funds to get elected this year, have so far not been able to get any works implemented due to various reasons stated in our previous volumes of the reports; also part of the approved budget has been shared with the old PRI members and therefore, initially showed reluctance in implementing the works, especially with the cooperation of Janakalyan since our team insists for true implementation. However, finally agreed to cooperate for the works which directly benefits the farmers to create productive assets only.

The concerned officers at various levels though express their full support whenever our team meets them, but creates all sorts of difficulties while making payment for the executed works to discourage the farmers / wage-earners. This was the major problem as if the payment for one activity is delayed then our team finds extreme difficulty in mobilizing the wage-earners / farmers to participate in subsequent works.

Our anticipation in the beginning of the program about the policy level problem as a hurdle to

complete the works in time was the most important cause for failure to initiate execution of the works. The government took a decision to reject all old job cards and requested people for fresh registration for job cards with their family and individual photos of all who wants to work under NREGA. With this decision coming into force, we had no eligible labors as per the Act and thus had start from zero with facilitation of the labor groups for job card registration and



bank account opening. This consumed our whole quarter for entire team with negligible results as the community has really lost faith in the scheme.

When we engaged ourselves in this ground work, the conflict between OLD & NEW GP members reached peak. The old group wants their payment for approved (executed in last financial year) works while the new group demands for execution of all works as per the approved plan. Finally, none of the works has been implemented in any of the GP till September 2010.

The micro-plans prepared by Janakalyan team involving all sections of the community and old GP members was withhold at ZP level, the interest of AIG members and other people to whom we had trained started diminishing. The team failed to sustain the motivation level of these trained people despite several efforts.

The wage rate of project area in agriculture operations is very high compared to that of NREGA and thus getting labor during crop-season (July-February) is difficult; however, in off-season (March-June) the labors are available in plenty.

Strategies adopted to execute NREGA works: The notable strategies adopted in order to get these works executed to create productive agriculture assets are- Complementary approach adopted to ensure the planned activities are implemented with

their cooperation. Taking the elected representative into confidence and implementing the shelf of works in their

leadership. A meeting of all the officers from all 3 tiers of PRI system in the chairmanship of the local MLA

to give them an impetus is conducted in August 2010; it was expected that this would help us to get the support and cooperation of the elected representative as well as PRI members.

AIG / WEG were the central force to implement the shelf of activities planned under NREGA. Labor groups are made aware by organizing meeting, training & sharing materials. The works approved for 2010-11 is shared among all labor groups and made aware about the

works planned in NREGA during this year. Labor groups are facilitated to register for job cards and apply for job allotment to GPs. Lot of pressure is created through labor groups at taluka and district level by NGOs and labor

unions and other people institutions. Many rounds of individual interactions with the beneficiaries for whom the works have been

approved followed by focused group discussion to make them understand the importance of these productive agriculture assets with the following reasoning- With these productive assets, they would derive the benefits for years and also for their next

generations, in terms of increased productivity. The benefits would be multiplied year after year.

If they do not create these assets this time but simply get percentage of money, they would never be able to create these assets in future, as government would not allow them to get the same benefits in future.

PRI members are convinced to cooperate with the concept that If you support the farmers to create these productive assets, they would remember you as

long as the structure remains with them while for the common infrastructure like village road, etc. nobody recognizes you.

The approved budget for the productive agriculture assets is part of the total budget where we are seeking your cooperation and not for all other activities.




35

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

In the whole nation, nobody has done work on this model of productive agriculture assets creation with NREGA funds and thus whole nation would recognize this model and also all of you once we prove this as a replicable model.

The officers of various levels responsible for execution of the NREGA works are convinced with the motivating factors like- Out of 164 GPs of the district (34 in Sindhanur taluk), we are requesting you all to support us

to create these 3 GPs as model GP so that we can give a model to the whole nation; definitely, as executing agency, the officers like you will be recognized by whole nation.

1.3.3 Implementation of SRI: As clear from our previous quarterly progress reports (Volume I,

II, III & IV), all these asset creating works have been implemented only during October-November & February-March due to election code of conduct and conflict between old and new GP members. As per our original plan, the demonstration of agriculture components should have been taken up with the farmers for whom the agricultural assets such as irrigation tank, drainage, land leveling is undertaken by the project. Since, our efforts were concentrated on such asset creating works, we lost few months of kharif season and then realized that the asset creation might go beyond the kharif crop. Therefore, the team identified interested farmers among AIGs who have assured sources of irrigation at least for part of their farm and initiated the demonstration of agricultural technologies such as SRI, IFS and high yielding crops. Therefore, though we will not be able to measure the exact outputs and outcomes of the project for agriculture components, the expenditure, yield and income data are documented from time to time which are furnished here.



Though, these demonstrations do not exhibit the benefits of the assets created by leveraging funds from NREGA, but since these are complete in themselves, the farmers have realized the importance of such technologies. It is worth mentioning here that without assured irrigation, we can neither demonstrate the benefits of SRI nor the vegetable cultivation; but even then the farmers have got good yield and realized that SRI, vegetable cultivation and IFS are very relevant systems of cultivation in the present context for this region. There was lot of hesitation towards adoption of SRI and thus there was very poor response too in the beginning; however, some of the participating farmers have now realized its importance and are ready to adopt it during next cropping year too. They found nothing important in IFS as many of the farmers has been doing it for years; however, the IFS package that Janakalyan propagates is tank-based and thus the farmers did not realize its importance during the year. It would be demonstrated again with the farmers having tanks in the next cropping year. Vegetable cultivation was a new addition to this area and farmers have got the taste during the year and we are sure they would definitely adopt it in the years to come as part of their regular farming activities.




37

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Though we have documented details about the expenditures, yield and return from these demonstration plots, but we don’t have any benchmark to compare the results as this is the first year we have introduced the program with these farmers. Therefore, we do not have the records of their previous year and hence cannot compare the data of the year with that of previous year. However, we can definitely make analysis of the data against the expenditures that with the return. Further, some of the farmers have also shared that the yield is more than that of previous year, but there are few others who have also mentioned that the return has reduced from that of previous year. The details of these experiments are tabulated below for your ready reference.

Sl. No.

Name of the farmer Village Gram

Panchayat Crop grown Area (ha)

Data from Demonstration Plot Net Profit Expenditure Yield Rate Return

1 Venkatesh Hediginal Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4700 3.5 3200 11200 6500 2 Allabhaksha Hediginal Badarli Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2775 2.5 3500 8750 5975 3 Mallikarjuna Valabellary Badarli Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2900 3.0 3000 9000 6100 4 Mudakappa Giniwar Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4800 4.0 3100 12400 7600 5 Channabasava Badarli Badarli Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2400 3.0 2900 8700 6300 6 Chidanandappa Haretanur Badarli Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2650 3.0 3000 9000 6350 7 Basappa Goniganur Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4000 4.0 2900 11600 7600 8 Yamanapp Goniganur Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4100 3.5.0 3000 10500 6400 9 Adeppa Thimmapur Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4250 4.0 2800 11200 6950

10 Pralladh RH C No.5 Badarli Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4250 4.0 3000 12000 7750 11 Girija Udbal Mad-Sirwar Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2500 3.0 3200 9600 7100 12 Veeresh Udbal Mad-Sirwar Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2500 4.5 2900 13050 10550 13 Basavanagouda Gomarci Mad-Sirwar Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2650 3.0 2800 8400 5750 14 Mali Earanagouda Gomarci Mad-Sirwar Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4050 4.0 3100 12400 8350 15 Murada Basappa Budiwal Mad-Sirwar Sorgham/Bengal gram 0.4 2600 4.5 2900 13050 10450 16 G Hanmanthappa Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Bengal gram/Sorgham 0.4 4200 3.0 2900 8700 4500 Total 6.4 55325 56.5 48200 169550 114225 Average 0.40 3458 4.0 3013 10597 7139 Per acre 1.00 8645 9.0 7531 26492 17848

It is clear from the table above that, by investing an amount of Rs.8645 per acre, the farmer has received a net return of Rs.17848 by adopting SRI approach during the year.

1.3.4 Implement LEISA with IIFS: Some of the AIG members have taken up IIFS activities in their farms i.e. diversified cropping system during the kharif season. But, all the components of the IIFS were not possible during the current year as the farmers do not have the farm ponds. Regular field visits by the staffs as well as providing all necessary technical supports from time to time to the farmers was important strategy during the year.



The expenditure, yield, return and net profit is documented in the following table-

Sl. No.

Name of the farmer Village Gram


Data from Demonstration Plot Net Profit Expenditure Yield Rate Return

1 Ramachandra Hediginal Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 9000 27 950 25650 16650 2 Naganagouda Valabellary Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.2 5050 12.5 980 12250 7200 3 Earanna Giniwar Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.2 5200 11.5 1050 12075 6875 4 Amaregouda Badarli Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 11600 28 1010 28280 16680 5 Rajashekhar K Haretanur Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 12350 29 1000 29000 16650 6 Devendrappa Thimmapur Badarli paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 11400 26 940 24440 13040 7 Girija Veeresh Udbal Mad-Sirwar paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 10700 28 960 26880 16180 8 Basavanagouda Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 11500 28 1010 28280 16780 9 Mali Earanagouda Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 11600 28 975 27300 15700

10 Muradabasappa Budiwal Mad-Sirwar paddy-Sona masuri 0.2 5300 14 1030 14420 9120 11 G. Hanmanthappa MadaSirwar Mad-Sirwar paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 9750 27 970 26190 16440 12 Chidanandappa Alabanur Alabanur paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 10700 27.5 990 27225 16525 13 Srikantha Gouda Belagurki Alabanur paddy-Sona masuri 0.4 11450 28 1000 28000 16550 Total 4.6 125600 314.5 309990 184390 Average 0.35 9662 24.19 989.6 23846 14184 Per acre 1 27304 68.37 67389 40085

It is clear from the table above that, by investing an amount of Rs.27304 per acre, the farmer has received a net return of Rs.40085 by adopting IFS approach during the year.

1.3.5 Supplement income by growing High Yielding Varieties (HYV): About 47 farmers have come forward to demonstrate high yielding varieties of vegetable cultivation during summer and the project has supported their intervention in terms of inputs as well as technical supports. The list of 37 farmers who have successfully completed the demonstration among these 47 farmers are provided below-

Sl. No. Name of the farmer Village Gram


Data from Demonstration Plot Net Profit Expenditure Yield Rate Return 1 Amreshappa Alabanur Alabanur

Bend

i, Pun

di, P

alak,

Mulla

ngi, E

re,

Thup

re, B

ringe

l, Lad

y-fing

er, M

enthr

e Pa

lle, K

otham

bre e

tc.,

1.00 9605 33500 23895 2 Yankappa Alabanur Alabanur 1.00 6550 26200 19650 3 Ambanna Alabanur Alabanur 0.20 5930 25500 19570 4 G.Veeresh Alabanur Alabanur 0.27 9210 35000 25790 5 Amresh Kannari Alabanur 0.20 2760 7450 4690 6 Basappa Kannari Alabanur 0.30 3010 15000 11990 7 Dodda Ambanna Kannari Alabanur 0.10 3690 8000 4310 8 Vishwanath R Kannari Alabanur 0.10 1850 5000 3150 9 Bimal Sarkar Indranagar Alabanur 1.20 13940 70000 56060

10 Amal Sarkar Indranagar Alabanur 1.10 10365 32100 21735 11 Abanna Nayak Giniwar Badarli 0.05 2150 7500 5350




39

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No. Name of the farmer Village Gram


Data from Demonstration Plot Net Profit Expenditure Yield Rate Return 12 Kumar swamy P Giniwar Badarli 0.05 2010 8500 6490 13 Tippanna Giniwar Badarli

Bend

i, Pun

di, P

alak,

Mulla

ngi, E

re, T

hupr

e, Br

ingel,

Lady

-finge

r, Me

nthre

Pall

e, Ko

thamb

re et

c.,

1.00 7140 25000 17860 14 Devanna M Giniwar Badarli 0.20 5930 25500 19570 15 karilingappa Giniwar Badarli 0.20 6430 25500 19070 16 yankoba Giniwar Badarli 0.20 6530 25500 18970 17 yankoba Giniwar Badarli 0.20 6330 25500 19170 18 Ambresh Giniwar Badarli 1.00 4520 17000 12480 19 Saraswathi M RH C No.5 Badarli 2.00 9250 42000 32750 20 Madhusudhan RH C No.5 Badarli 0.20 11980 47200 35220 21 Bishwanath Bar RH C No.5 Badarli 0.20 5930 25500 19570 22 Khadu Mandal RH C No.5 Badarli 0.20 3900 18500 14600 23 Jagadish bawali RH C No.5 Badarli 0.20 6720 8000 1280 24 Suresh biswas RH C No.5 Badarli 0.05 3690 18000 14310 25 Sharanappa Haretanur Badarli 0.20 3800 7500 3700 26 Amresh Haretanur Badarli 0.20 6230 14500 8270 27 Shiwangouda Haretanur Badarli 0.20 6230 20500 14270 28 Hanumanthappa Madsirwar Madsirwar 0.20 4600 14400 9800 29 Shankrappa Madsirwar Madsirwar 0.20 6230 16500 10270 30 Kariyappa Madsirwar Madsirwar 0.30 4110 12500 8390 31 Mahadevappa Gomarsi Madsirwar 1.00 5000 23500 18500 32 Pampapati Udbal EJ Madsirwar 0.20 4600 17000 12400 33 Gangappa Udbal EJ Madsirwar 0.20 4020 14100 10080 34 Veeresh Udbal EJ Madsirwar 0.10 6720 8000 1280 35 Shivarayappa Budihal Madsirwar 0.10 3900 15250 11350 36 Mallappa Budihal Madsirwar 0.10 3900 18500 14600 37 Virupanna Budihal Madsirwar 0.20 5330 10500 5170 Total 14.42 214090 0 0 769700 555610 Average 0 5786 0 0 20803 15016 Per acre 14847 53377 38531



The same can be better understood from the following table; a rupee invested in SRI fetches a return of Rs.3.06 with a net return of Rs.2.06 while that in the case of vegetable is Rs.2.47 & Rs.1.47 and for IIFS is Rs.3.60 and Rs.2.60 respectively. It demonstrates that IIFS remained more beneficial crop during the year.

Demonstration Investment Return Net Profit SRI 1.00 3.06 2.06

Vegetables 1.00 2.47 1.47 IIFS 1.00 3.60 2.60




41

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Technical Training: Further, the farmers were taken to University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur wherein 54 farmers and all project staffs participated in a day-long exposure cum training on IFS at KVK, Raichur on 24-9-2010 to gain knowledge about the activities to be adopted with the irrigation tanks. This training mainly focused on IIFS, horticulture crops, animal husbandry, agriculture extension practices for rabi crops, fish cultivation, etc. Dr. A. R. Kurubar, Horticulture Specialist and Dr. B. K. Desai, Specialist for IFS and Mr. Mohanchandra Chawhan and 3 professors from KVK and UAS, Racihur were involved during this training program.



1.3.6 Introduce Collective Purchase of inputs and sale of produces: The concept of Collective

Purchase and Marketing through AIG is introduced among the farmers and one of the AIG has already started practicing by procuring all the inputs through collective purchasing process. The inputs purchased by the Sri Basaveshwara AIG, Haretanur from KVK Raichur for about 100 farmers and distributed in small quantity to these farmers are – 1) Ticoderma 2) Rhysobium 3) Azatobacter 4) Azospirlam 5) PSB culture 6) All types of seeds for all demonstration




43

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Chapter II Learning from Field

(February 2010 – March 2011) Social projects are implemented to learn from the experiences and a project of this nature has a broader goal for learning for wider application. NREGA has attracted the attention of global planners and more so if productive assets creation is possible leveraging funds from this very important & large scale project. At the end of the project period, Janakalyan team has learnt many things, some of which are recorded below in the following sequence- 2.1 Major Problems faced in implementing the activities: Problems are bound to come and we are there to overcome all such problems is the basic

understanding of Janakalyan team. An effort to put all these problems in this chapter is not to discourage the readers but to help them not to repeat the same. Learning comes if problems are encountered while implementing activities in field and therefore, problems are recorded first followed by learning. The major problems encountered by the team while implementing the activities are- Villages belong to a particular Gram Panchayat while the land of the farmers falls in the boundary of

another revenue village. Which village microplan shall cover the farmer? Many farmers are requesting to take up productive asset creating works in their farm only; how to

prioritize and whom to leave? During rainy season, it would be difficult to get labors for the works like drainage line, farm pond

excavation, etc. Lack of participation of PRI members in the gram sabha as well as micro planning exercise. If the land falls under Tungabhadra command area, then farm pond cannot be excavated, the GP

secretary says. Farmers do not sit in the gram sabha throughout the discourse to deal with the issues related to

farming. Most of the farmers are interested to show their own land during the transect walk; they don’t walk to

others’ land due to hot sun in this summer. Many of the farmers do not have job cards; how to get is an issue for the farmers. Difficult to get 50 members in each AIG especially in the small villages. Election of Gram Panchayat has created difficulty in completing the microplanning exercise and also

the estimate; similarly approval of the plan was also difficult until the election completed. Communities have negative attitude towards social development initiatives and government

functionaries, especially anything related to Gram Panchayat. Lack of cooperation by Gram Panchayat Secretary and PRI members. Some of the farmers still do not know about NREGA and its provisions. Reluctance of communities about NREGA activities as well as Gram Panchayat members was the

foremost obstacle in implementing the project activities; it is difficult to change the mindset of communities about NREGA & GP members.

The rights and entitlements of communities under prestigious NREGA were not known to the communities; they only knew that NREGA is for the GP members, they need to give their job cards to the GP members for implementing the works.



GP members considered themselves as the contractors to implement NREGA activities as planned by the GP secretary. The GP secretary also fixes the target and timeline that the said amount MUST be spent within a prescribed time limit without even bothering the agricultural operations.

Election process for lower tier of PRI i.e. GP members and subsequently election of Presidents and Vice-presidents delayed implementation of all NREGA activities.

Demand of each farmer to take up his/her land for excavation of farm ponds / drainage in waterlogged areas / plantation of trees/ construction of roads, etc was another major difficulty before the team to finalize the microplans.

Many duplicate job cards have been created to draw funds after carrying out the activities using machineries.

In every village, duplicate bank accounts have been created in the names of the wage-earners without their notice and amount has been drawn from their accounts with fake signatures / thumb impressions.

Action Plan not prepared in Gram Sabha but by the GP members without even consulting the stakeholders and such prepared action plans are not being approved in time for proper implementation.

Labor-oriented works are not being taken up in almost 98% cases. Almost all works are carried out by machines and materials; however, in the documents they have

maintained the 40:60 ratio of materials: labors. NREGA wage is less than the market wage rate in irrigated areas; there is huge demand for raising

the wage-rate as per the market rate. Technical staffs are not recruited by ZP but outsourced causing delay in payment and work

execution. No systematic documentation at GP level delaying the payment process up to 6 months in several

cases. Mates are not recruited at GP level; those who have been recruited by labor group is also not

accepted by the GP/departments. Worksite facilities to the wage earners are not provided at all; wage-earners are not aware of such

entitlements. Continuous 15 days works not given to any group in GP. Insurance is not being provided to any workers who have completed 50 days of works. Injured workers are not provided with hospital benefits as per the provision of NREGA. Our anticipation in the beginning of the project about the policy level problem as a hurdle to

complete the works in time was the most important cause for failure to initiate the works. The government took a decision to reject all old job cards and requested people for fresh registration for job cards with their family and individual photos of all who wants to work under NREGA. With this decision coming into force, we had no eligible labors as per the Act and thus had start from zero with facilitation of the labor groups for job card registration and bank account opening. This consumed our whole quarter for entire team with negligible results as the community has really lost faith in the scheme.

When we engaged ourselves in this job card mobilizing and bank account opening kind of ground work, the conflict between OLD & NEW GP members reached peak. The old group wants their payment for approved (executed in last financial year) works while the new group demands for execution of all works as per the approved plan. Finally, none of the works has been implemented in any of the GP.

The micro-plans prepared by Janakalyan team involving all sections of the community and old GP members was withhold at ZP level, the interest of AIG members and other people to whom we had




45

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

trained started diminishing. The team failed to sustain the motivation level of these trained people despite several efforts.

Lack of personnel at the GP level is another big hurdle; there is only single post i.e. Panchayath Development officer (PDO) to look after about 15-20 schemes of GP along with NREGA. Further each PDO is made responsible for 2-3 GP. Even taking care of 1 GP by 1 PDO itself is a heavy to bring outputs. In our project GPs too, full time PDO was not till date but after several protests, the government has appointed only 2 PDO in 3 GPs.

The wage rate of project area in agriculture operations is very high compared to that of NREGA and thus getting labor during crop-season (July-February) is difficult; however, in off-season (March-June) the labors are available in plenty.

During the last (2009-10) year flood, lot of activities have been executed in all the Gram Panchayat of Raichur district which were not approved in last year Action Plan (beyond the approved budget by the Government of India); these activities have been officially approved during current year action plan and decided to make payment to the old GPMembers during the current financial year while the newly elected GP members want to take up new works. Therefore, they are not taking up any work during the current but entering last year figures in the website.

The new GP members want to implement all the approved works as per the action plan while the old GP members, since they have invested in these works want their payment reimbursed by the officers. Both the groups are right as well as wrong because most of the works have not been implemented by the old members but are claiming for payment, thus the old members are at fault; similarly, some of the works have been implemented but was not paid and hence the new members are at fault. In this fight, the labor groups are the sufferers.

The conflict between old and new GP members is a problem difficult to resolve. One of the reasons is that most of the works which the old GP members are claiming for payment are either incomplete or not executed at all while there are some genuine cases also. The new GP members want to conduct a systematic scrutiny and then make payment for genuine works.

Election code of conduct was cited as the reason till last quarter while now their statement has changed.

2.2 Solutions to the problems:

Most of the issues are resolved through discussion and debate among the farmers themselves. Various types of stakeholders such as youths, leaders, farmers and wage earners are involved in these meetings. Lot of discussions about NREGA and Janakalyan approach to make it successful with the cooperation of farmers helped resolving most of the unhappiness among the farmers. How Janakalyan is different from Gram Panchayat and government functionaries was clarified to address these issues. Government is taking all kinds of measures to rectify the misappropriations that has taken place in

past while implementing NREGA and therefore, you can expect good results in the days to come” was a kind of assurance that Janakalyan team has given to the communities in order to remove their reluctance attitudes.

Several rounds of training and awareness activities to the AIG members and wage-earners and potential farmers have made them aware about the Rights & Entitlements under NREGA along with all salient features of the said Act, which are in favor of the communities / wage-earners and farmers.



Taking PRI members into confidence by involving them in each and every activity under the project was another strategy to bring them on track.

Convincing the farmers that each of them will get the benefits from NREGA once it is streamlined as per the provision of the Act; they must cooperate to initiate few activities under these heads and thereafter, they will exercise their own rights to get the benefits for excavation of farmponds, plantation, drainage or road.

The concept of “Model GP” has motivated the newly elected GP members and other elected representatives as well as frontline functionaries to involve themselves in the project activities.

“Use 1st year for these asset creation activities and if the community does not recognize their service, then next 4 years they can use to get their investment back” has worked to bring the GP members on track.

Facilitated the process of getting their new job cards from the authority on case to case basis. Action Plans are prepared in Gram Sabha for the 1st time in the history of NREGA using microplan

tool and efforts are on to get these approved by the government. Of late, started promoting labor groups in each of our operation villages and decided to link these

groups with labor union in the district. Participated in 3 rounds of protests exclusively to change the situation of NREGA programs at

district level in association with other institutions/associations operative in the district to create pressure on the government.

Initiated an action to involve all NGOs and other networks around the issue and conducted a district level hunger strike and AHORATRI DHARANA on 15.8.2010 day at Ambedkar circle, Raichur.

Compelled the Principally Secretary, Department of RDPR, Government of Karnataka to intervene at district level to initiate the execution of shelf of works with immediate effect.

AIG and WEG members met twice in the last 5 months to discuss about permanent PDO to be posted to Madsirwar and Badarli Panchayat. MLA discussed with EO, taluka panchayat and arranged PDOs for both the GP during last month.

In all the 3 GPs already Gram Sabha conducted to start works under NREGA immediately. We facilitated about 1000 families already for registration of job cards and to obtain job cards and to

open SB accounts as during the reporting period. Helped the communities to take the photos and other documents to get job cards.

2.3 How these could have been better implemented:

To make these activities more effective, following should have been adopted- Little more time shall have been provided to make these plans more effective and interactive. Election and paddy harvesting hindered the process of participation; it would have been more

effective, had it been done little later. Presence of Gram Panchayat members as well as secretaries could have been ensured in

microplans after another 15-20 days (after completion of election process). The project that has commenced in February 2010 should have been commenced little earlier than

this, i.e. during September-October 2009, as proposed in our proposal; this could have helped us to finalize the shelf of works using micro-planning tool before December 2009 and submitted to the government for its approval. Now that the government has already approved an action plan for 2010-11, they are assigning the same reason and not accepting the plan prepared by the community to take up asset building activities. This being the major problem, we could have avoided by submitting the action plan before the due date.




47

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

We have planned for asset creating activities whereas the implementing authorities are neither equipped nor interested even in implementation of the project activities through labors. At the same time, the wage-earners are also not willing to take part in labor-oriented works due to various factors of NREGA implementation. We should have addressed these basic issues first before taking up larger issues like asset-building activities. At least 1 year should have been earmarked for the awareness building and community empowerment works in these GP before initiating asset-creating activities.

While most of the issues related to NREGA are complex in nature and beyond the control of small scale intervention and thus demands large scale intervention. However, project commencement and duration is also a hurdle in our way which could be resolved by extending it for few more months. But, to make this program a successful event in future, it shall be taken up at least for 3 years period as described in the learning section of this report.

2.4 Learning:

The major learning during the reporting period are- Microplan is an important tool to bring communities to the same platform. Farmers have greater needs for productive assets creating activities but are not aware about the

provisions of NREGA. Farmers have very negative attitude towards Gram Panchayat and are reluctant to participate any

activities in the name of Gram Panchayat. Farmers have their own reservation against SRI, IFS and vegetable cultivation and might become

difficult to implement these activities in these villages. Janakalyan team has lot of apprehensions about the new set of Gram Panchayat members going

to get elected on 8.5.2010; success of the project mostly depend on these sets of PRI members as implementation of NREGA activities are directly undertaken by this lower tier of PRI.

Communities have very raw ideas about NREGA, its objectives, their rights and entitlements, how they can get benefits from NREGA, how it could help them to resolve all agricultural needs.

Community feels that NREGA is meant for the GP members and they are the contractors to execute this shelf of works.

Community does not see any role in implementation of NREGA shelf of works; neither they know who to plan the works and for whom?

Communities have made to understand by the PRI members as well as government functionaries that they are supposed to hand over their job cards to the GP members.

The innocent men / women from the rural areas have now learning corruption because of NREGA; they engage themselves in their farm-works while hand over their job-cards to the GP members @ 15-30% of the wage-rate.

Janakalyan should not have planned the asset-creating activities for the 1st year rather it should have taken up awareness, capacity building and empowerment activities during the 1st year; the asset-building activities should have been taken up in the subsequent years.

Project should commence in accordance with the NREGA cycle as per the government norms so that the micro-planning is completed in November and shelf of works is submitted in December to the government for approval.

This kind of project shall be taken up in larger areas (more number of GPs) to create pressure on government. The intervention in small areas might not create the desired pressure on both political as well as administrative system.



Policy level advocacy at district and state levels is equally important to make the project successful in parallel to the field level interventions.

Demonstration of agricultural practices shall be planned only after creation of durable productive assets in the farms leveraging funds from NREGA. Without creating of assets neither SRI nor IIFS or vegetable cultivation is possible. For all these, we need to ensure availability of irrigation water on regular basis.

The project concept is well taken by the communities and all of them are participating wholeheartedly as this can really make their livelihood secured in long run; the only issue is the duration of the project should have been at least 3 years to implement all these planned activities is their suggestion.

One must predict all the possible obstacles well ahead of initiating the concept; e.g. in this case, we had never thought about the upcoming GP election which has direct relation in implementation of NREGA activities. Similarly, the case of project commencement and period.

We have learnt from our experience that a program of this nature shall be initiated in July-August for a minimum of 3 years period. Preplanning Phase (July-October): All the preplanning activities (AIG promotion,farmer

election, microplanning, etc.) shall be completed before October and actual implementation (excavation of irrigation tanks) shall commence immediately after harvesting of the crops. Because, the land become free from crops during this period and also government accepts the shelf of works in December. This period could be effectively be used in building relationship with various line departments for possible collaboration to leverage funds from developmental projects.

Planning phase (November-December): In consultation with GP, executing authorities and labor groups the work execution plan shall be prepared during November- December.

Execution Phase (January-June): Execution of shelf of works including irrigation tanks should be done between January-June. This is the very right time to complete all farm pond excavation, bund strengthening, drainage in water-logged areas and other similar works.

Demonstration Phase (July-March): Immediately after execution and with the commencement of monsoon in July, we can introduce crop & water related experiments in the field to demonstrate the benefits of IIFS package of Janakalyan. Field days, Result sharing program, internal exposures for neighboring farmers, etc shall also be conducted during this period to bring more farmers under the umbrella.

Post Implementation Phase (April-June): This is the period when planning shall be done for next phase of activities based on the performance in previous project period. This is how we have planned to use the learning form the project to incorporate in next project phase. Complementary approach is the best approach and would be successful in a way we are proceeding ahead in due course of time.

Complementary approach is the best approach as against the right-based approach for a program like NREGA to ensure real benefits to the farmers.

Complementary approach, as practiced in this project, is slow but steady and is a sustainable intervention in long run while the right-based approach might bring immediate results but wipe out at the end of the intervention.

Institution building at the grass root level for the wage-earners as well as farmers is essential component of the project to create productive agriculture assets which acts as pressure groups for the PRI members as well as government functionaries.

Microplanning is the only tool to mobilize communities by making them realized their needs and the possibilities of getting these needs met through the NREGA.




49

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Information is power and thus the communities made aware about the facts and figures related to

NREGA on day to day basis, it would make them active in deriving the benefits from the national flagship program like NREGA; a kiosk at Gram Panchayat may help a lot to achieve this goal.

Though it is not that easy to motivate the elected representatives and government functionaries towards selfless works, but the team is now ready with several strategies to ensure that they create productive agricultural assets in the subsequent years.

There are many farmers for whom the productive agriculture assets have been sanctioned under NREGA but are not interested to execute these works instead wants to get some percentage of the earmarked budget without creating the structures; this is because they do not have proper knowledge about these structures and also the importance of such structures and the impacts that these structures would bring in long term. Our efforts have changed mindsets of many farmers to execute the works in their farmers during the year.

The labors are also hesitating to participate in execution of the works as they are not able to meet the output criteria and thus minimum wage per day; instead if they go for agriculture operations, they can earn more money than NREGA with lesser efforts and energies. Therefore, many of the works have been implemented using machines in the places where labors were not available.

Chapter III Action Plan

(April 2011 – March 2014) 3.1 Plan of Action for next 3 years to make it a replicable model:

Based on the learning from pilot phase, Janakalyan proposes that interventions which it has initiated in February 2010 shall be taken forward with the following activities for next 3 years commencing from April 2011 with the support of SDTT. This being a unique approach of Janakalyan, nowhere in the country it has been implemented. Upon successful of the intervention, it would become a National Model and could be adopted in all districts across the country. If, using this complementary model, we can reduce the corruption even by 20-30% form the present level, it would be huge contribution to the country if we consider the amount of funds the government is investing in this particular program. The following activities have been planned for next 3 years keeping the learning in mind.

Sl. No. Activities to be Completed Justification / Descriptions about the activities Target Quarters

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th11th12th

I Developing the skills and empowering the communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning tools, shelf of works and labor budget under NREGA for their Gram Panchayat and get it approved in the Gram Panchayat and subsequently include in the district level plan

1 Task Force Committee (TFC) formation in each of our operational villages for NREGA.

Education about NREGA is very important among communities; they must realize how public funds are not used for the purposes it is meant for in the present system of NREGA implementation and what their role to implement all works with 100% efficiency and transparency. To create a cadre of people in the villages who would take active role of vigilance to review the activities proposed under NREGA, its implementation, motivating labor groups to take part in the work execution

40 TFC

2 Promotion of Women Groups, Wage Earners Group (WEG) and Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG)

To ensure their participation in implementation of NREGA shelf of works to create productive agricultural assets and providing employment to needy families.

50 institutio

ns

3 Strengthening Women Groups / SHGs in each village through capacity building training

To motivate them to take part in implementation of shelf of approved productive asset creating works instead of letting all the works being implemented by the GP members.

1000 member

s

4 Ensuring effective conduct of Gram Sabha and preparation of action plans in the gram sabha

Efforts shall be put to ensure that the Action Plans preparation and beneficiary selection shall be in gram sabha using micro-planning tools only and the final list must be displayed in prominent places of the villages. The practical & felt needs of the communities shall be reflected in the Annual Action Plans prepared under NREGA giving more emphasis on labor-oriented productive assets creating works/ activities.

40 micropla

ns

II Sensitization Campaign for (3 tiers) PRI members with special focus on Gram Sabha members to sensitize the importance of irrigation tanks, plantation, drainage and physical connectivity of the land and the scope of covering these under NREGA

5 PRI members must be given NREGA is not only meant for labors but also for whole communities as it helps creating lot of 300 PRI




51

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No. Activities to be Completed Justification / Descriptions about the activities Target Quarters

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th11th12th

motivational, personality development and life skill development training to imbibe high level principles in their lives.

public assets in the rural area. It allows GP members to take up all kinds of rural development activities to create basic facilities & required amenities; thus PRI members can create their self-respect, positive image and moral value in the eyes of local public. Through this training if we can bring positive development attitude among at least 2-3 PRI members from each village, it would be a great achievement and definitely we will achieve the expected changes in the villages through them.

members and

government

officers

6 Workshop to sensitize bureaucrats as well as elected representative

To orient them about the importance of productive agricultural assets under NREGA for making the agriculture sector profitable in long run.

5 worksho

p

III Implementation of sanctioned shelf of works to generate employment opportunities for their fellow villagers; at the same time, create water harvesting structures (irrigation tanks), improve connectivity, improve soil health and plant biomass generating species in the farms. Supplement these activities with demonstration of IIFS package to make agriculture sustainable.

7 Execution of productive agricultural assets creating activities in project villages

Creating water harvesting structures, soil health improvement systems (drainage), land development, plantation and other such productive assets by leveraging funds from NREGA through Community Driven Development Approach

200 works

8 Demonstration of latest agricultural technologies with farmers

To demonstrate judicious utilization of water and other natural resources created leveraging NREGA funds

50 demonst

ration

IV Facilitation of knowledge building by providing access to information through knowledge center establishment as well as community magazine introduction in the villages 9 Wall Magazine to display

NREGA works related information on weekly / monthly basis in every village

Transparency shall be brought in implementation of NREGA shelf of works by ensuring that the GP displays the information on works approved, work allotted to SHG/ institution/ department for implementation, works under progress, works completed, etc., on the notice board and it is to be updated and uploaded to GP website regularly.

144 Number

s

10 A Kiosk with internet connection shall be put in each GP head quarter

To provide updated information to the communities on every project, every village with approved budget and its utilization on day to day basis; this will help public to know all information from time to time and raise questions for prevention of corruption to a large extent. This Kiosk shall also provide latest amendment to the NREGA implementation and all relevant forms for labor communities. It would also assist the stakeholders to apply for employment, unemployment allowance, insurance, work site facilities, medical benefits, etc.

8 kiosks

3.2 Strategies to implement the program: In future, the following strategies to be adopted to effectively implement the proposed activities- Sensitizing the elected PRI members immediately about the needs of the farmers and how they

can contribute towards their village development. Taking these elected representatives into confidence and implementing the shelf of works in their leadership.

Take the PRI members for an exposure to a place where the elected representative has done an excellent work under NREGA.

Orienting the front line functionaries to take up asset-building activities under NREGA. A meeting of all the officers from all 3 tiers of PRI system in the chairmanship of the local MLA to give them an impetus, which would help us to get the support and cooperation of the elected representative as well as PRI members.

Empowering AIG & Wage-earners to demand for asset-building activities under NREGA. AIG/WEG would be the central force to implement the shelf of activities planned under NREGA. Empower the labor groups (WEG) and submit demand for works to respective GP as per approved shelf of works.

Complementary approach would be adopted to ensure the planned activities are implemented with their cooperation; if it does not work, then the right-based approach through these AIGs would be initiated because by then our AIGs would also become enough strong through our capacity building initiatives.

Pursue with government for approval of micro-plans prepared by the community for next financial year (2011-12) as this is the right time for submission to the government for approval.

We ensure the members from all WEG and AIGs attend the monthly KDP meetings convened by EO at taluka level to share their concerns.

We would invite the Taluka level NREGA nodal officers to the respective GPs to resolve the conflicts arise from time to time and to give immediate solutions in the field itself at GP level, if necessary at respective village level too.

We continue to organize labor community and form WEGs and educate them and help them for registration for job cards, bank account opening and to submit job demand application to GP.

Help GP to conduct WEG members meeting every month to discuss about works on going, works completed and works yet to be taken up and to develop action plans involving all WEG members for successful implementation of works by maintaining coordination among all levels. This kind of regular monthly meeting will certainly help to ensure works execution in time, proper monitoring and documentation so that payments also will be credited to their account in time.

3.3 Anticipated Problems:

Some of the anticipated problems which might come in the way of implementing these activities are - Seasonal agricultural operations might come in the way of implementing the NREGA activities;

shortage of labor in time would be a constraint. Approval of the shelf of works (prepared using microplan tool) by government would be a

constraint. This would become the major constraint in achieving our target of leveraging funds from NREGA for asset creating activities.

Failure of monsoon would be a constraint in demonstrating the agricultural packages such as IFS, SRI and high-income crops.

Delay in completing asset building activities would bear an impact on the demonstration activities, as these are directly related with the proposed assets such as drainage in waterlogged areas & excavation of farm ponds.




53

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

The elected GP members might also become a constraint in the way of taking up asset creating activities under NREGA, if they are not self-driven.

Policy level decisions by the government/ policy makers in relation to NREGA would become the major constraint in achieving the objectives.

Shortage of labor might be another issue as there is a chance that many works start simultaneously in all the GPs to complete government targets before closure of the financial year; thus use of machines might be more than expected.

Our labor groups might not get more opportunities to work as they won’t be able to participate in parallel works.

Transfer of PDOs may be a great hurdle to achieve progress in time. 3.4 Strategies to ensure participation of all stakeholders:

The strategies those would be adopted to ensure participation of all the stakeholders in the project execution would different for different groups as stated below- Plan to ensure people’s participation: Without participation of the wage-earners and farmers, this project is a day-dream; the major strategies would remain- AIG is the central strategy to ensure wage-earners while demonstration of agricultural

demonstration Taking up asset-building activities would ensure participation of farmers in the project Regular meeting of AIG, Need-based training to the farmers and Routine gram sabha in all villages would ensure participation of the community in the project

activities. Bring more and more families under the umbrella of WEG / AIG

Plan to ensure PRI members participation: Participation of PRI members, especially the lower tier is essential component to make the activities implemented through NREGA. The major advantage we have is the new set of GP members, who have yet not been polluted by the polluted administrative and political practices. The major strategies that we plan to adopt to convince this PRI members are- One to one contact with these elected GP members to motivate them towards social cause, Exposure trip for them to the MODEL GP in the country where good NREGA works have taken

place; take all the PRI members to a GP where extraordinary works have been done by elected representative to motivate these PRI members.

Motivational training on regular basis would help us to bring the PRI members on track. Implementation of all activities under their leadership, Requesting them to chair all community functions, Exposing them as the person who has been responsible for making the activities successful would

be some of the major strategies to motivate the PRI members. Help the PRI members in engaging labors for the shelf of works they want to execute in their

constitutions thereby providing jobs to our labor groups and implementing asset creating activities for the farmers.

Provide all possible support in documentation and other execution related activities through our GPOs.



Honoring these PRI members in functions organized in the villages and giving all credits before the communities that whatever good works are happening in their villages are because of these PRI members.

Plan to ensure government staff involvement: Government functionaries are also important stakeholders in making the project successful; though, most of them have their own hidden agenda behind the scheme but still all of them also like to do some good works in their lifetime. However, they are driven by the context and thus can’t translate this into action. Further, they also lack in man power and political will. Given an environment, we strongly believe they will cooperate and support our intervention and contribute significantly in making the project successful. The major strategy convincing strategy would be- Do in your own way in all GP leaving only 3 GP for us to make these GP as “model GP” in making

the objectives of NREGA achieved with your great cooperation and support. The government staffs will cooperate only when they feel that our interventions are complementing

in achieving their targets and therefore the following strategies would be adopted in future- 1) Providing all assistance to the GP and TP level staffs in completing the approved activities in

time through our AIG/WEG. 2) Assisting the government staffs to complete documentation of the activities through our GPOs. 3) Honoring the government staffs in public meetings organized in the villages and giving all

credits before the communities that whatever good works are happening in their villages are because of these officers who are committed for the development of the communities.

The major problems encountered and the lessons learnt are recorded in this chapter of the report and planned to use the above strategies in completing the planned activities in future.

Annex 1 Gram Sabha Details

Sl. No

Village Date of Gram 1st Sabha

Participants in 1st Gram Sabha Total No of Gram sabha Male Female SC ST Tot

al Number of

GS Average

Participants 1. Hedaginal 06-04-2010 42 - 20 10 42 3 60% 2. Udbhal EJ 06-04-2010 11 3 15 - 24 3 50% 3. Gomarsi 07-04-2010 18 - 10 - 18 3 40% 4. Haretnur 07-04-2010 18 - 07 10 18 3 60% 5. Alabanur 08-04-2010 33 - 10 1 33 3 45% 6. Gonniganur 08-04-2010 14 01 02 10 25 3 50% 7. Badarli 09-04-2010 36 - 10 15 36 3 40% 8. Kannari 09-04-2010 22 - 10 4 22 3 50% 9. Budihal 10-04-2010 18 2 2 3 18 3 55% 10. Maladinni

Camp 10-04-2010 27 06 02 03 27 3 70%

11. B R Camp 11-04-2010 14 02 04 08 16 3 54% 12. Valaballary 11-04-2010 28 - 10 10 28 3 60% 13. Belagurki 12-04-2010 26 - 10 8 26 3 55% 14. R H Colony

No.5 12-04-2010 23 - - 23 3 40%

15. Madasirvar 15-04-2010 25 - 6 10 25 3 55% 16. Giniwar 16-04-2010 26 - 10 5 26 3 60% 17. Timmapur 16-04-2010 34 - 8 4 34 3 45%



Annex 2

Situation Analysis Detail

Sl. No. GP Village Total

Population Crops Grown Works taken up under NREGA Proposed activities

1

Alab

anur

Alabanur 2065 Paddy, cotton, Sorghum, Bengal gram,

sunflower

Farm pond, road repair, village drain, jungle

cutting

Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm pond, plantation, flood control measures,

road repair 2 Belagurki 1858 Paddy, cotton,

Sorghum, Bengal gram, sunflower

Farm pond, road, village drain, jungle cutting

Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm pond, plantation, flood control measures

3 Kannari 850 Paddy, cotton, Sorghum, Bengal gram,

sunflower

road repair, village drain, jungle cutting


4 Maladinni Camp

100 Paddy, cotton Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting


5 B R Camp 939 Paddy, cotton, sorghum Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting, canal

desilting


6

Bada

rli

Badarli 1447 Paddy, cotton, sorghum, sunflower bengalgram,

Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting


7 Haretnur 953 Paddy, cotton, sorghum, sunflower bengalgram



8 Gonniganur 145 Paddy, Cotton, sunflower, sorghum,

bengalgram


Bunding, subsurface drainage, farm pond, plantation, flood control measures

9 Giniwar 2400 Cotton, paddy, sorghum, bengalgram, sunflower

Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting, canal

desilting

Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree plantation, flood control measures

10 Valaballary 1515 Cotton, Paddy, sunflower, bengalgram

Road repair, village drain, canal desilting, jungle

cutting


11 R H Colony No.5

1100 Paddy, cotton, sunflower, bengalgram



12 Hedaginal 2298 Paddy, cotton, sunflower, bengalgram



13 Timmapur 1550 Paddy, sunflower Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting


14

Mada

siraw

ar

Madasirawar

1740 Paddy, cotton, sorghum, bengalgram, sunflower

Road repair, jungle cutting, village drain

Sub surface drain, farm pond, tree plantation, flood control measure

15 Udbhal 840 Paddy, sunflower, cotton Road repair, village drain, jungle cutting

Sub surface drain, farm pond, plantation, flood control measures, road repair

16 Budihal 1100 Paddy, cotton, sunflower, bengalgram


Sub surface drain, farm pond, bunding, flood control measures, road repair

17 Gomarsi 1749 Paddy, cotton, sunflower, bengalgram


Sub surface drain, farm pond, bunding, flood control measures, road repair




57

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Annex 3 List of WEG members

Sl. No.

Name of the Member

Father / Husband Age Sex Caste

1. Alabanur 1 Nagamma W/O Malleshappa 45 F Lingayath 2 Channama D/O Malleshappa 22 F Lingayath 3 Sharadamma W/o Amareshappa 36 F Lingayath 4 Basamma W/O mukappa 34 F Lingayath 5 Mukappa S/o Linganna 45 M Lingayath 6 Parvathamma W/o Basavarajappa 40 F Lingayath 7 Neelamma W/O hanumanagouda 36 F Lingayath 8 G.Venkatesh S/o mukappa 20 M Lingayath 9 Parvathamma W/O Kalyanappa 43 F Lingayath

10 Channamma D/O Kalyanappa 21 F Lingayath 11 Basavaraj S/O Kalyanappa 24 M Lingayath 12 C.Mallamma W/O Basavaraj 19 F Lingayath 13 Amrutha D/O Basavaraj 18 F Lingayath 14 Earamma W/O Basappa 33 F Lingayath 15 Aanandamma W/O Rangapur Venkatesh 45 F Lingayath 16 Venkatesh S/O Sanna Amaragundappa 32 M Lingayath 17 Pampapathi S/O Rangapur Bheemanna 35 M lingayath 18 Nirmala W/O Pampapathi 26 F Lingayath 19 Ratnamma W/O Basappa 30 F Hadapad 20 Ambamma W/O Ramesh 45 F Hadapad 21 Ramesh S/O Mudakappa 54 M Hadapad 22 Aalambi W/O Husen sab 36 F Muslim 23 Huligemma W/O Mudiyappa 40 F Madiwalar 24 Mudiyappa S/O Rajappa 45 M Madiwalar 25 Mallamma W/O Ambayya 38 F Madiwalar 26 Ambayya W/O Rajappa 44 M Madiwalar 27 Yallamma W/o Basappa 34 F Nayak (ST) 28 Yankappa S/O Basappa 25 M Nayaak(ST) 29 Basappa S/O Dyavappa 50 M Nayak(ST) 30 Yamanamma W/O Basappa 45 F Nayaka(ST) 31 Renukamma W/O Amaresh 34 F Nayaka(ST) 32 Amaresh S/O Basappa 40 M Nayaka (ST) 33 Gangamma W/O Adeppa 35 F ST 34 Lakshmi W/O Yamanappa 42 F ST 35 Virupamma W/O Siddayya 40 F Lingayath 36 Yamanamma W/O Mudiyappa 39 F SC 37 Sharanamma W/O Basappa 30 F SC 38 Ambamma W/O Ramesh 45 F Hadapad



Sl. No.

Name of the Member


39 Venkatesh S/O Sanna Amaragundappa 32 M Lingayath 40 Pampapathi S/O Rangapur Bheemanna 35 M lingayath 41 Nirmala W/O Pampapathi 26 F Lingayath 42 Ratnamma W/O Basappa 30 F Hadapad 43 Ambamma W/O Ramesh 45 F Hadapad 44 Ramesh S/O Mudakappa 54 M Hadapad 45 Aalambi W/O Husen sab 36 F Muslim 46 Parvathamma W/o Basavarajappa 40 F Lingayath 47 Neelamma W/O hanumanagouda 36 F Lingayath 48 G.Venkatesh S/o mukappa 20 M Lingayath 49 Parvathamma W/O Kalyanappa 43 F Lingayath 50 Mudiyappa S/O Rajappa 45 M Madiwalar

2. Badarli 1 Ayyappa S/O yallappa 32 M SC 2 Basamma W/O Ayyappa 28 F SC 3 Veeresh S/O Duragappa 28 M SC 4 Pakeeramma W/O Veeresh 25 F SC 5 Gurappa S/o Ayyappa 38 M ST 6 Ambamma W/o Gurappa 32 F ST 7 Basavaraj S/o Yallappa 26 M ST 8 Renukamma W/O Basavaraj 21 F ST 9 Husenappa S/O Mudakappa 27 M ST

10 Parvathamma W/O Husenappa 24 F ST 11 Gireppa S/O Batta Ayyappa 32 M ST 12 Hanumanthamma W/O Gireppa 30 F ST 13 Thippamma W/O krishnappa 40 F ST 14 Basamma W/O Thirupathi 38 F ST 15 Huligeppa S/O Bheemappa 30 M SC 16 Shanthamma W/O Huligeppa 25 F SC 17 Mahadevamma W/O Lokappa 35 F SC 18 Nagamma D/O Lokappa 18 F SC 19 Devendrapa S/o Huligemma 28 M SC 20 Lakshmi W/o Devendrappa 22 F SC 21 Yallapa S/o Thippanna 38 M SC 22 Earamma W/O Yallappa 35 F SC 23 Ramanna S/O Yallamma 50 M SC 24 Sharanamma W/O Ramanna 40 F SC 25 Basavaraj S/O Channappa 25 M SC 26 Neelamma W/O Basavaraj 20 F SC 27 Ayyappa S/O Bheemappa 38 M SC 28 Basamma W/O Ayyappa 32 F SC 29 Ayyappa S/O Muddappa 35 M SC




59

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No.

Name of the Member


30 Sharanamma D/O Ayyappa 18 F SC 31 Earappa S/O Sabanna 35 M SC 32 Gangamma W/O Earappa 45 F SC 33 Sanna Sabanna S/o Duragappa 40 M SC 34 Sangamma W/o Sanna Sabanna 35 F SC 35 Ayyappa S/O Dodda Sabanna 26 M SC 36 Devamma W/O Ayyappa 21 F SC 37 Hulagappa S/O Thimmanna 35 M SC 38 Channamma W/O huligeppa 30 F SC 39 Ningappa S/O Chagappa 30 M SC 40 Pamamma W/O ningappa 27 F SC 41 Yamunappa S/O Basappa 40 M SC 42 Mashamma W/O Yamunappa 38 F SC 43 Yallamma W/O Basanna 22 F SC 44 Basanna S/O Chagappa 26 M SC 45 Husenappa S/O Shivappa 26 M SC 46 Virupamma W/O Husenappa 21 F SC 47 Basavaraj S/O Shivappa 22 M SC 48 Umadevi W/O Basavaraj 20 F SC 49 Huchappa S/O Husenappa 24 M SC 50 Shivamma W/O huchappa 22 F SC

3. Goniganur 1 Ayyappa S/O Basappa(Uchegida) 30 M ST 2 Ambamma W/O Ayyappa Uchigida 27 F ST 3 Jalihal Ayyappa S/O kanakappa 38 M ST 4 Mukamma W/O Ayyappa 32 F ST 5 Ayyappa Muk S/O Earappa 39 M ST 6 Parvathamma W/o Ayyappa Muk 32 F ST 7 Husenappa S/O Nagappa 28 M ST 8 Parvathamma W/O husenappa 26 F ST 9 San Mallayya S/O Nagtappa 30 M ST

10 Ningamma W/o mallayya 28 F ST 11 Kanakappa S/O Mallayya 35 M ST 12 Hanmanthamma W/O Kanakappa 30 F ST 13 Hanmantha S/O Ayyappa 40 M ST 14 Channabasamma W/O hanumantha 35 F ST 15 San Devanna S/O Shankarapa 40 M Madiwalaru 16 Papamma W/o Devanna 32 F Madiwalaru 17 Huligeppa S/O Dhyavanna 21 M Madiwalaru 18 Huligeppa S/o Dyavanna 22 M Madiwalaru 19 Dyavanna S/O Ayyappa 45 M ST



Sl. No.

Name of the Member


20 Yallamma D/O Dyavappa 24 F ST 21 Ayyappa S/O Bheemraya 26 M ST 22 Kanakappa S/o Bhimraya 45 M ST 23 Gangamma W/o Ayyappa 34 F ST 24 Lakshmi W/O Kanakappa 41 F ST 25 Pampanna S/O Earappa 35 M ST 26 Lakshmi W/O Pampanna 35 F ST 27 Pompanna S/O Thimmayya 44 M ST 28 Huligemma W/o pompanna 40 F ST 29 Kariyappa S/O Yamanappa 35 M ST 30 Ambamma W/O kariyappa 30 F ST 31 Huligeyya S/O kariyappa 48 M ST 32 Nagamma S/O kariyappa 20 F ST 33 Hanumayya Ayyappa 39 M ST 34 Narasamma W/O hanumantha 40 F ST 35 Basappa S/O Yamanappa 46 M ST 36 Gangamma W/O Basappa 40 F ST 37 Huligeyya S/o Dyavappa 40 M ST 38 Hampamma W/O Devappa 30 F ST 39 Amaresh S/O Ramanna 40 M ST 40 Narasamma W/O Amaresh 30 M ST 41 Pakeerappa S/o Ramanna 45 M ST 42 Nagamma W/O Pakeerappa 40 F ST 43 Hanumantha S/O Thimmayya 45 M ST 44 Gangamma W/O hanumanth 40 F ST 45 Nagapa S/o Gireppa 30 M ST 46 Pamayya S/o nagappa 45 M ST 47 Malappa S/O Hanumanth 39 M ST 48 Devamma W/O Malappa 35 F ST 49 Ramesh S/O Malappa 26 M ST 50 Ambanna S/O Hanumantha 27 M ST

4. Haretanur 1 Ramanna S/O Husenappa 28 M ST 2 Channamma W/o Ramanna 25 F ST 3 Amaresh Salgunda S/o Thippanna nayak 35 M ST 4 Rangamma W/O Amaresh Salgunda 32 F ST 5 Geethamma W/o Shippa 55 F ST 6 Swamy S/o Shivappa 28 M ST 7 Earamma W/o Swamy 25 F ST 8 Ramanna S/O Shivappa 25 M ST 9 Linganna S/o Yankoba Giniwar 60 M ST

10 Basamma W/o linganna 50 F ST




61

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No.

Name of the Member


11 Basavaraj S/O Ayyappa Giniwar 40 M ST 12 Kanakamma W/O Basavaraj 35 F ST 13 Ramanna S/o Ayyappa Salgundi 40 M ST 14 Ambamma W/o Ramanna 35 F ST 15 Mukappa S/o San Ayyappa 42 M ST 16 Huligemma W/O Lachamayya 40 F ST 17 Husenappa S/o hanumanth 35 M ST 18 Gangamma W/o husenappa 30 F ST 19 San Ayyappa S/o Sagarappa 38 M ST 20 Mahadevamma W/O San Ayyappa 35 F ST 21 San Ayyappa S/o Earappa Devaramane 28 M ST 22 Duragamma W/O San Ayyappa 25 F ST 23 Dod Ayyappa S/O Earappa 30 M ST 24 Lingamma W/o Dod Ayyappa 28 F ST 25 Husenappa S/o Rangayya nalgamdinni 40 M ST 26 Dyavamma W/O husenappa 35 F ST 27 Parshuram S/O Husenappa 18 M ST 28 Ayyamma W/o Chinchar Ramanna 50 F ST 29 Kanakappa S/o Chinchar Ramanna 22 M ST 30 Huligeyya S/O Chincharki Ramanna 22 M ST 31 Husenappa S/O Ramanna 28 M ST 32 Basamma W/o husenappa 25 F ST 33 Ayyappa S/o Devendrappa 30 M ST 34 Lakshmi W/o Ayyappa 25 F ST 35 Gangappa S/o Devendrappa 28 M ST 36 Parvathamma W/o Gangappa 24 F ST 37 Huligeyya S/o Devendrappa 25 M ST 38 Ayyamma W/o huligeyya 20 F ST 39 Amaresh S/O Devendrappa 19 M ST 40 Sabanna S/o Ragayya 40 M ST 41 Ayyamma W/o Sabanna 35 F ST 42 Basayya S/o Rangayya 40 M ST 43 Mukamma W/O Basayya 36 F ST 44 Huligeyya S/O Ayyappa Nalgamdinni 30 M ST 45 Gangamma W/o Huligeyya 25 F ST 46 Dod Kriyppa S/o Ayyappa nalgamdinni 45 M ST 47 Duragamma W/o Dod kariyappa 35 F ST 48 Duragayya S/o Ayyappa nalgamdinni 42 M ST 49 Hobalemma W/o Duragayya 38 F ST 50 Parasappa S/o Ayyappa 45 M ST

5. Maladinni Camp



Sl. No.

Name of the Member


1 Narayanappa S/o Ramanna 48 M ST 2 Duragamma W/o narayanappa 40 F ST 3 Shivaraj S/O Narayanappa 24 M ST 4 Kariyappa S/O narayyappa 22 M ST 5 Mahesh S/o Narayanappa 20 M ST 6 Beesamma W/o San Rangappa 48 F Uppar 7 Mariyappa S/O San Rangappa 30 M Uppar 8 Sharanappa S/o San Rangappa 26 M Uppar 9 K.Sharanappa S/o Govindappa 35 M Uppar

10 Duragamma W/O K.Sharanappa 30 F Uppar 11 Dyavamma W/o Amarappa 45 F ST 12 Adeppa S/o Amarappa 30 M ST 13 Earamma D/O Adeppa 25 F ST 14 Basavaraj S/O Adeppa 20 M ST 15 Amaramma D/o Adeppa 18 F ST 16 Rajasab S/o Hydersab 26 M Muslim 17 Husenamma W/O Rajasab 24 F Muslim 18 Husenamma W/O hydersab 45 F Muslim 19 Rajamma D/o Hydersab 20 F Muslim 20 Hasensab S/O Husensab 48 M Muslim 21 Gudamma W/o hasensab 45 F Muslim 22 Husenamma D/o hasensab 24 F Muslim 23 Bashasab S/O hasensab 20 M Muslim 24 Durugappa S/o Shivappa 35 M Nayak 25 Bandenavaz S/O Hasensab 30 M Muslim 26 Husenbi W/O Bande Navaz 26 F Muslim 27 Dyamamma W/O Shivappa 40 F ST 28 Basamma W/o Duragappa 30 F ST 29 Basavaraja S/O Shivappa 26 M ST 30 Jalalamma D/o Basavaraj 24 F ST 31 Husenappa S/o EArappa 40 M SC 32 Gouramma W/o Husenappa 35 F SC

6. Belagurki 1 Pampathi S/o lachamanna 28 M SC 2 Shyamamma W/o pampapathi 26 F SC 3 Hanumantha S/o Lachamanna 34 M SC 4 Earamma W/o hanumantha 30 F SC 5 Gangadhara Lachamanna 26 M SC 6 Maremma W/o Gangadhar 24 F SC 7 Hanumantha S/o Hire Yankoba 35 M SC 8 Mankalemma W/o Hanumantha 30 F SC




63

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No.

Name of the Member


9 Yankamma W/o Hire Venkoba 45 F SC 10 Hire yankoba S/o kaggalappa 50 M SC 11 Mudiyappa S/O Thimmanna 38 M SC 12 Lakshmi W/o Mudiyappa 35 F SC 13 Lakshmipathi S/O nagappa 40 M SC 14 Mahadevi W/O lakshmipathi 35 F SC 15 Husenappa S/O nagappa 38 M SC 16 Parevathamma W/O husenappa 29 F SC 17 Amaresha S/o husenappa 19 M SC 18 Basavaraja S/o San yankoba 36 M SC 19 Gangamma W/O Basavaraj 30 F SC 20 Hanumanthi W/o yankoba 48 F SC 21 Bheemanna S/o Yamunappa 50 M SC 22 Guramma W/o Bheemanna 48 F SC 23 Anjanayya S/o Bheemayya 28 M SC 24 Devamma W/o Anjanayya 24 F SC 25 Husenamma W/o Yamunappa 35 F SC 26 Fakeerappa S/o yankappa Dani 35 M ST 27 Krishnamma W/o Fakeerappa 35 F ST 28 Yankappa S/o Balappa 48 M ST 29 Basamma Yankappa 40 F ST 30 Nagappa Yankappa 35 M ST 31 Muthamma Nagappa 30 F ST 32 Bheemamma Ayyappa 45 F Kurubaru 33 Mudiyamma Ayyappa 18 F Kurubaru 34 Ayyamma W/O Basappa 50 F Kurubaru 35 Hanumantha S/o Ningappa 40 M Kurubaru 36 Rudramma D/o hanumantha 35 F Kurubaru 37 Sharanabasamma Hanumantha 20 F KURUBARU 38 Mahadevi D/o hanumantha 18 F Kurubaru 39 Kariyappa S/O Basappa 48 M Kurubaru 40 Mallamma W/O Kariyappa 39 F Kurubaru 41 Beerappa S/o Kariyappa 20 M Kurubaru 42 Hampamma D/o kariyappa 19 F Kurubaru 43 Amaresh S/o kariyappa 36 M Kururbaru 44 Shivamma W/o Amaresha 28 F Kurubaru 45 Basavaraj S/o kariyappa 29 M Kurubaru 46 Ambamma W/o Basavaraj 26 F Kurubaru 47 Nagappa S/o Kariyappa 25 M Kurubaru 48 Lakshmi W/o nagappa 24 F Kurubaru 49 Yankappa S/o kariyappa 28 M Kurubaru



Sl. No.

Name of the Member


50 Earamma W/o Yankappa 26 F Kurubaru

7. Udbal 1 Girija W/o Veeresh 35 F OBC 2 Mallamma Hire Ningappa 32 F OBC 3 Ramadevi Veeresh 25 F OBC 4 Yamunamma Veeresh 20 F OBC 5 Dyamanna Virupanna 30 F SC 6 Gangamma Shekharappa 25 F OBC 7 Dyavamma W/O Ambanna 34 F SC 8 Lakshmi Wo mudakappa 32 F OBC 9 Ratnamma W/o Dyavappa 25 F OBC

10 Parvathamma W/o Chandrayya Swamy 28 F OBC 11 Sharanamma W/o Ghamanna 34 F OBC 12 Mallamma W/o Nagappa 39 F OBC 13 Shankramma W/o kariyappa 44 F SC 14 Lakshmi W/o yankappa 26 F SC 15 Ningamma W/o Virupanna 19 F OBC 16 Earamma W/O Hanumantha 22 F OBC 17 Gundamma W/o Basanna 43 F OBC 18 Fakiramma W/o nagesh 37 F OBC 19 Dodda Basamma W/o Gundappa 34 F OBC 20 Kamalamma W/o yamanappa 56 F OBC 21 Earamma W/o Shekhappa 45 F SC 22 Gangamma W/o Basavaraj 54 F OBC 23 Kariyamma W/o hanumantha 34 F OBC 24 Earamma W/o Renukappa 29 F OBC 25 Mukudamma W/O Veerappa 43 F OBC 26 Malamma W/O yamanappa 33 F OBC

8. Madasirwar 1 Kalasappa S/o Thippanna 45 M OBC 2 Husensab S/o Rajasab 44 M OBC 3 San hanumantha S/o Siddappa 39 M OBC 4 Kariyappa S/O San Virupanna 32 M OBC 5 Virupanna S/o Siddappa 29 M OBC 6 Narasimharaj S/O hanumantha 44 M OBC 7 Nagaraj S/o Changaleppa 25 M OBC 8 Mallamma W/O kariyappa 34 F OBC 9 Sharanamma W/o Shivappa 40 F OBC

9. Gomarsi 1 Basavaraj 34 M 2 Basavaraj 27 M OBC 3 Veerabhadrappa 45 M OBC




65

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

Sl. No.

Name of the Member


4 Devamma 45 F OBC 5 Akbarsab 42 M OBC 6 Mallesh 31 M OBC 7 Mudakappa 24 M OBC 8 Dharmanna 23 F SC 9 Yamunappa 19 M OBC

10 Yankappa 22 M OBC 11 Venkatesh 26 M OBC 12 Maskilsab 31 M OBC 13 Tajuddin 42 M OBC 14 Yankoba 47 M OBC 15 Veeresha 25 M SC 16 Hampayya 26 M OBC 17 Siddappa 29 M OBC 18 San kariyappa 30 M OBC 19 Nirupadeppa 33 M OBC 20 Shivappa 22 M OBC 21 Kariyappa 33 M OBC 22 Mudakappa 40 M OBC 23 Dharmanagouda 18 M OBC 24 Mutturaj 24 M OBC 25 Mahadevappa 29 M OBC 26 Kariyappa 35 M SC 27 Hanumanthappa 39 M OBC 28 Khajasab 41 M OBC 29 Jagiramma 28 F OBC 30 nagaraj 24 M OBC



Annex 4 List of AIG members

Sl. No.

Name of the AIG Member

Age Sex Contact Number Remarks

Alabanur 1. T Basaavaraj 35 Male 9901060566 2. Pampapati 25 Male 9880112041 3. Sangamesh 34 Male 4. G Venkatesh 23 Male 5. Channappa 28 Male 6. Rajashekar 34 Male 7. P Suresh 42 Male 8. Basanagouda 24 Male 9. Prabakarao 34 Male 10. Basavaraj 43 Male 9901692550 11. Amaresh 23 Male 9901584793 12. Chidandappa 23 Male 13. Sharanabasava 42 Male 9535663542 14. Jadiswami 28 Male 15. Lingaraj 35 Male 16. Basavaraj 34 Male 17. Channabasava 23 Male 18. Channabasava 43 Male 19. Ayyappa 23 Male 20. Yankappa 34 Male 21. Channappa 25 Male 22. Sharanppa 25 Male 9902844825 23. Veeresh 34 Male 9972611691 24. Ayyappa 31 Male 25. Channabasava 32 Male 9591701913 26. Channappa 33 Male 27. Sharanabasava 43 Male 28. Doddabasava 34 Male 29. Rudragouda 25 Male 30. Matangappa 21 Male 31. Channappa 24 Male 32. Siddappa Kumbar 34 Male 33. Mallanna 43 Male 34. Hanumanth 23 Male 35. Suresh 23 Male 36. Shivappa 42 Male 37. Veeresh 28 Male 38. Adappa 23 Male 39. Venkatesh 34 Male 40. Basavaraj 23 Male 41. Nagaraj 25 Male 42. Basava 26 Male

Kannari 1 Kariyappa 26 Male 9535663452 2 Sharanappa 32 Male 9591097300 3 Mounesh 32 Male 4 Basappa 23 Male 5 Karilingappa 24 Male 6 Ayyappa 26 Male 7 Tayappa 28 Male




67

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

8 Mareppa 45 Male 9611401048 9 Rudrappa 54 Male 10 Ramanagouda 54 Male 11 Mudiyappa 34 Male 9901561235 12 Suresh 33 Male 13 Veerabadrappa 54 Male 14 Yankappa 34 Male 15 Mariyappa 43 Male 16 Bhimanna 52 Male 17 Ambanna 42 Male 18 Ambanna 32 Male 19 Kuberappa 23 Male 20 Laxmikanthreddy 24 Male 21 Vishvanathreddy 25 Male 9972503367 22 Mudiyappa 23 Male 9845286785 23 Pampangouda 34 Male 9901222251 24 Jayaraj 23 Male 25 Ramesh 23 Male 9902701952

R.H. Colony No.5 1 Jagadish Bavali 52 Male 2 Madhav Bavali 34 Male 3 Satypriya Mandal 23 Male 4 Subhod Mandal 45 Male 9741154914 5 Bishvanath Bar 25 Male 6 Durgapad bar 45 Male 7 Prashant Biswas 23 Male 8 Sundar Mandal 42 Male 9 Murari Mandal 54 Male 10 Samakin Bairagi 34 Male 11 Balavar 35 Male 998014204545 12 Amulya Mandal 34 Male 9880051204 13 Shivakumar 32 Male 14 Kuber Mandal 33 Male 15 Shankar Ray 35 Male

B.R Camp 1 Dadafir 45 Male 9945347453 2 Kariyappa 54 Male 9900808842 3 Mohan 32 Male 9611803421 4 Nabisab 31 Male 9945547433 5 Nagarjureddy 25 Male 9900679714 6 Ramakrishna 35 Male 984503735 7 Veerappa 34 Male 8 Amaregouda 31 Male 9972611691 9 Himanbareddy 23 Male 10 Ambanna 24 Male 9591670590 11 Marenna 34 Male 12 Ravindrareddy 23 Male 9902114590 13 Nagareddy 23 Male 9741622543 14 Sahadebamali 25 Male 9740336937 15 Channabasava 25 Male 997280419 16 Huseneppa 24 Male 17 Basavaraj 23 Male 18 Gopal Acharya 25 Male 19 Pampapati 23 Male



20 Suribabu 25 Male 21 Mallikarjunreddy 26 Male

Badarli

1 Somappa 23 Male 2 Huseneppa 24 Male 3 Channabasava 26 Male 4 Nagappa 28 Male 5 Sharanabasava 45 Male 9945768675 6 Devareppa 54 Male 7 Doddanagouda 54 Male 8 Hemavati 34 Female 9 Hanumanthappa 33 Male 10 Nagareddy 54 Male 9632633153 11 Choudayya 34 Male 12 Pampapati 43 Male 13 Hanumanth 52 Male 14 Hanumanthappa 42 Male 15 Basanna 32 Male 16 Pampapati 23 Male 9591292659 17 Amaramma 32 Male 18 Timmanna 31 Male 19 Basavaraj 23 Male 9901996964 20 Anjineyya 25 Male 21 Siddayya 27 Male 22 Basanna 21 Male 23 Nagappa 32 Male 24 Akkamma 31 Female 9901996964 25 Devaraddy 34 Male 26 Pampanagouda 34 Male 27 Sharanappa 32 Male 9902202089 28 Veerangouda 33 Male 9448538430 29 Virupayya 21 Male 9663239640 30 Veeresh 25 Male

Hedaginal

1 Vijay 34 Male 9972291572 2 Durugappa 23 Male 3 Anand 45 Male 9741629756 4 Danappa 25 Male 5 Ayyappa 45 Male 6 Mukappa 23 Male 7 Huligeppa 42 Male 8 Siddappa 54 Male 9 Pamanna 34 Male 10 Veeranna 35 Male 11 Hanumanth 34 Male 12 Huseneppa 32 Male 13 Hanumanthamma 33 Female 14 Nagappa 35 Male 15 Lalitamma 28 Female 16 Mudukappa 45 Male 17 Veeranna 54 Male 18 Duragappa 54 Male 19 Narasappa 34 Male




69

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

20 Durugappa 33 Male 21 Nagappa 54 Male 22 Arunappa 34 Male 23 Venkoba 43 Male 24 Devaputrappa 52 Male 25 Manikkamma 42 Female 26 Durugappa 32 Male 27 Venkoba 23 Male 28 Yallamma 32 Male 29 Danappa 31 Male 30 Mallappa 23 Male 31 Erappa 25 Male 32 Pampanna 27 Male 33 Narasinhappa 21 Male 34 Eramma 45 Female 35 Ramappa 23 Male 36 Basavanth 42 Male 37 Satyappa 28 Male 38 Mallikarjun 45 Male 39 Hanumanth 54 Male 40 Venkayya 54 Male 41 Narasayya 34 Male 42 Anantreddy 33 Male 43 Bhagyamma 54 Female 44 Ramappa 34 Male 45 Krishnappa 43 Male 46 Umadevi 52 Male 47 Ayyanna 42 Male 48 Sanna Venkatesh 32 Male 49 Basanagouda 23 Male 50 Hanumanth 32 Male

Madasirvar 1 Siddappa 34 Male 99721186606 2 Virupanna 35 Male 9880343197 3 Mallayya 34 Male 9663239535 4 Huseneppa 32 Male 9008436598 5 Siddappa 33 Male 9663239454 6 Kariyappa 35 Male 9535920633 7 Bhimanna 28 Male 8 Adavi 45 Male 9 Huligeppa 54 Male 10 Timmanna 54 Male 11 Kalasappa 34 Male 12 Nagaraj 33 Male 13 Lingappa 54 Male 14 Eranna 34 Male 15 Rudramma 43 Male 16 Hanumanth 27 Male 17 Amajappa 21 Male 18 Hanumanth 45 Male 19 Ramanna 23 Male 20 Yankappa 42 Male 21 Rudrappa 28 Male 22 Siddappa 45 Male



23 Nagaraj 54 Male 24 Chandrappa 54 Male 25 Adappa 34 Male 26 Bhimanna 33 Male 27 Kariyappa 54 Male 28 Virupanna 34 Male 29 Mallayya 43 Male 30 Basavaraj 52 Male 31 Govindappa 24 Male 32 Mudukappa 34 Male 33 Malappa 23 Male

Belagurki 1 Hanumangouda 42 Male 2 Ayyappa 32 Male 3 Sharanappa 23 Male 4 Chandrasekarayya 32 Male 5 Yankappa 31 Male 6 Narayanappa 23 Male 7 Pampanna 25 Male 8 Basavaraj 27 Male 9 Davanna 21 Male 10 Aleshappa 45 Male 11 Kasimbi 23 Male 12 Bhimama 42 Male 13 Yankappa 28 Male 14 Laxmipati 45 Male 15 Shankareddy 54 Male 16 Ayyappa 54 Male 17 Hanumanth 34 Male 18 Amaaresh 33 Male 19 Nagappa 54 Male 20 Nagappa 27 Male 21 Hulagappa 54 Male 22 Chandragouda 54 Male 23 Pakiramma 34 Male 24 Shivareddy 33 Male 25 Basamma 54 Male 26 Rudrappa 54 Male 27 Yankappa 54 Male 28 Basangouda 34 Male 29 Chandragouda 33 Male 30 Kariyamma 54 Male 31 Huseneppa 34 Male 32 Ningappa 54 Male 33 Eranna 54 Male 34 Akashappa 34 Male 35 Shivagnappa 33 Male 36 Basavaraj 54 Male 37 Huchamma 34 Male 38 Davanna 43 Male 39 Tayamma 52 Male 40 Aminamma 42 Male 41 Manamma 32 Male 42 Ambranna 23 Male 43 Venkatredy 32 Male 44 Davanna 31 Male




71

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY

45 Pakirapa 23 Male Budihal

1 Basangouda 54 Male 2 Doddangouda 54 Male 3 Ambanna 34 Male 4 Shanrappa 33 Male 5 Rangappa 54 Male 6 Basavaraj 34 Male 7 Kalyanappa 43 Male 8 Channabasava 52 Male 9 Bhimaraya 42 Male 10 Channabappa 32 Male 11 Chandrappa 23 Male 12 Shankragouda 32 Male 13 Amarappa 31 Male 14 MoulappaYankoba 23 Male 15 Pavademma 33 Male

Udball 1 Yankoba 34 Male 2 Yallappa 54 Male 3 Hanumanthappa 54 Male 4 Basangouda 54 Male 5 Amrappa 54 Male 6 Hanumanthappa 34 Male 7 Hampayya 33 Male 8 Shivappa 54 Male 9 Nagappa 34 Male 10 Erappa 43 Male 11 Yankappa 52 Male 12 Mallayya 42 Male 13 Davanna 32 Male 14 Basanna 23 Male 15 Basavaraj 32 Male 16 Moulappa 31 Male 17 Veeresh 23 Male 18 Malappa Male 19 Hanumanthappa Male

Haretnur 1 Annapurnamma 22 Female 2 Neelamma 34 Female 3 Chidandappa 43 Male 4 Ha,payya 54 Male 5 Sharanappa 54 Male 6 Basamma 34 Male 7 Amareshappa 33 Male 8 Pampapti 54 Male 9 Hanumesh 34 Male 10 Huseneppa 43 Male 11 Mallayya 52 Male 12 Manjunath 42 Male 13 Amaresh 32 Male 14 Shankrappa 23 Male 15 Basanna 32 Male

Timmapur



1 Mahes Swam 23 Male 2 Hanumanth 54 Male 3 Ayyappa 54 Male 4 Adappa 54 Male 5 Dodda Ayyappa 34 Male 6 Adappa 33 Male 7 Muduakayya 54 Male 8 Basappa 34 Male 9 Mallayya 43 Male 10 Mallikarjun 52 Male 11 Basavaraj 42 Male 12 Chagappa 32 Male 13 Ayyapppa 23 Male 14 Shekarayya swami 32 Male 15 Veerabdrappa 31 Male 16 Ayyappa 23 Male 17 Mallayya Male 18 Ayyappa Male

Goniganur 1 Parangouda 54 Male 2 Giregouda 34 Male 3 Basavarj 33 Male 4 Basanagouda 54 Male 5 Ramesh 34 Male 6 Lokesh 43 Male 7 Huligeyya 52 Male 8 Nagaraj 54 Male 9 Sagarappa 34 Male 10 Shankrappa 43 Male 11 Ayyappa 52 Male 12 Nagraj 42 Male 13 Timmayya 32 Male 14 Huligaeyya 23 Male

Valballary 1 aTimmanna 31 Male 2 Basavaraj 23 Male 3 Mallayya Male 4 Eranna 54 Male 5 Veeresh 34 Male 6 Basappa 33 Male 7 Nagabushan 54 Male 8 Jadeyy swami 34 Male 9 Rangappa 43 Male 10 Eranna 52 Male 11 Siddareddy 54 Male 12 Ayyappa 34 Male 13 Linganna 43 Male 14 Hampayya 52 Male 15 Gourappa 54 Male 16 Hampyaya 34 Male 17 Pampanna 43 Male 18 Lankeppa 52 Male 19 Ramesh 42 Male 20 Mallapagouda 32 Male

Annex 5 NREGA shelf of work execution details

Sl. No. Category of work Description of

Works Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Total

Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total I Water Harvesting

1

Desiltation and improvement any open wells, ponds and water

tanks

Formation of New tank for storing the water

0

540000 360000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000

2


tanks

Formation of New tank for storing the water 0

360000 240000 600000 0 360000 240000 600000

3 Irrigation Canals(Small and

Minor irrigation canals) Formation of Canal from 54 distributory to village 0

360000 240000 600000 0 360000 240000 600000

4

providing water supply to the Lands of SC-ST , BPL

families & IAY beneficiaries Hanumappa S/O Thippanna 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

5


families & IAY beneficiaries Huligeppa-Bheemappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

6


families & IAY beneficiaries Amaresh Karibasappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

7 Water harvesting & Conservation works

Formation of tank for storing water 0 0 660000 440000 1100000 660000 440000 1100000

8

Providing water supply to the lands of SC-ST, BPL

families & IAY beneficiaries Hanumantha S/o

Huligemma 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

9


families & IAY beneficiaries Yankappa S/o Hanumantha 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

10


families & IAY beneficiaries Marriyappa S/o

Bandeppa 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000



Sl. No. Category of work Description of Works

Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total

11


families & IAY beneficiaries Mudiyappa S/o

Hanumatha 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

12


families & IAY beneficiaries H.Sharanappa S/o

Jadeyappa 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

13


families & IAY beneficiaries Kariyappa S/o Erappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

14


families & IAY beneficiaries Bagappa S/o

Kariyappa 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

15


families & IAY beneficiaries Pampanna S/o

Gadeppa 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

1


tanks

Formation of New tank for storing the water 0

120000 80000 200000 0 120000 80000 200000

2 Water harvesting & Conservation works

Formation fo new Tank for water storage pupores 0 0

708000 472000 1180000 708000 472000 1180000

6


families & IAY beneficiaries Basappa-Huligemma 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

9


families & IAY beneficiaries Basappa-Sanna Amaragundappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

11


families & IAY beneficiaries Basavaraja -Thippanna 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

14


families & IAY beneficiaries Shekharayya S/O Karibasayya 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000




75

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



17


families & IAY beneficiaries Ayyappa Rangappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

20


families & IAY beneficiaries Narasappa Honnurappa 40000 10000

50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000

22


tanks

Desiltation of Irrigation Tank of Kannari village

360000 240000 600000 0 360000 240000 600000

24


tanks

Desiltation & improvement of water tank

120000 80000 200000 0 120000 80000 200000

25


tanks


60000 40000 100000 0 60000 40000 100000

26


tanks


60000 40000 100000 0 60000 40000 100000

27


tanks


60000 40000 100000 0 60000 40000 100000

28


tanks

Desiltation & improvement of water tank (fixing of boundry stones and fencing by Tanthi)

30000 20000

50000 0 30000 20000 50000

Total 1370000 630000 2000000 1380000 920000 2300000 1368000 912000 2280000 4118000 2462000 6580000

II Land development





1

Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands

Levelling the Navagrama area lands and fixing the boundries (in New Residential sites) 0

480000 320000

800000 0 480000 320000 800000

2


Levelling the ground of Sri.Hallada Duragamma Temple 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000

3


Parvathamma-Sharanappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

4


Lingamma-Dyavappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

5


Moulappa-Basappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

6


Balaswamy-Rayappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

7


Mudakappa-Hanumanthappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

8


Siddappa-Adi Basappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

9


Muradabasappa-Basappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

10


Hirappa-yankappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

11


Earappanna-Ayyappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

12 Land development works of

SC-ST, BPL & IAY Earappa-Hanumanthappa 0 0 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000




77

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



beneficiary lands

13


Karemma-Nagoleppa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

14


Kannari Nagappa-Mudukappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

15


Moulappa-Hanumanathppa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

16


Gonappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

17


Hanumanthi-Hallappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

18


Pampanna-Hanumantha 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

19


Yallamma-Gyanappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

20


Shankarmma-Kariyappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

21


Durugamma-Earappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

22


Mallappa-shivappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

23


Husenasab-Alamsab

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000





24


Moulasab-Maab Sab

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

25


Gangappa-yamanappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

26


Laxmi-Ayyappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

27


Dasara Kariyappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

28


Dyavappa-Hosagerappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

29


Hemareddy-venkanagowda

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

30


Earamma-Ningappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

31


Dyavamma-Basappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

32


Virupanna-siddappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

33


Rudrappa-yamanappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

34


Laxmamma-sanna Virupanna

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

35


Pakirappa-yamanappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000




79

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



36


Shankarmma-Rangangowda

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

37


Huligemma-Basappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

38


Husenappa-Honappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

39


Amabamma-Govindraja

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

40


Mangamma-Rangappa

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

41


Moulasab-Galimasab

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

42


Sannappa-sharabanna

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

43


Earanna -Ayyanna

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

44


Levelling the Navagrama area lands and fixing the boundries (in New Residential sites) 0

180000 120000

300000 0 180000 120000 300000

45


Dyavappa-yamanappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

46


Sanna yankappa-Husenappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000





47


Shivappa-pampanna 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

48


Durugamma-Earappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

49


Yallappa-Earappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

50


Huligemmma-yallappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

51


Chandrappa-Malleshappa 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

52


Earanagouda -Basavanagouda 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

53


Karibasayya-Channabasayya 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

54


Basamma-Thippamma 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

55


Chidanandappa-pamanna 0 0

12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000

56


Kariyappa Earappa 10000 0 10000 0 0 10000 0 10000

Total 10000 0 10000 660000 440000 1100000 684000 456000 1140000 1354000 896000 2250000

III Connecting Road to the farms

1

formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera

village roads

Formation of new road from main road to Navagram village (Joining road) 0

540000 360000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000




81

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



2


village roads

Formation of interior roads in Navagram village 0

540000 360000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000

3


village roads

Formation of Main roads in Navagrama village 0

540000 360000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000

4


village roads

Improvement to the Giniwar to yaddaladoddi road 0

180000 120000 300000 0 180000 120000 300000

5


village roads

Improvement to the road going from Thimmapur to CSF No.2 0

180000 120000 300000 0 180000 120000 300000

6


village roads

Formation of interior roads in Indira colony in Thimmapur village 0

90000 60000 150000 0 90000 60000 150000

7


village roads

Formation of CC Road in RH No.5 (Interior road) 0

120000 80000 200000 0 120000 80000 200000

8


village roads

Formation of CC Road from ST Oni to Narayanappa House 0 0

120000 80000 200000 120000 80000 200000

9


village roads

Formation of road from Budiwal to Kannari 0 0

90000 60000 150000 90000 60000 150000

10


village roads

Formation /Improvement of road from Main road to Basavanagouda farm 0 0

96000 64000 160000 96000 64000 160000

11


village roads

Formation / Improvement of road from Udbal (J) Camp to Dasara Nala 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000

12


village roads

Removing of Jungle and adding Maram to

the road used by 0 0 180000 120000

300000 180000 120000 300000





farmers for going to farms

13


village roads

Formation / Improvement of road from Vala-Bellary road to Sannamma House 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000

14


village roads

Levelling the area where clothes are washed by the public 0 0

24000 16000 40000 24000 16000 40000

15


village roads

Construction/Improvement of Road form Stream to Maldinnin Camp

120000 80000 200000 0 0 120000 80000 200000

16


village roads

Construction of Kannari to Uppal Road

126000 84000 210000 0 0 126000 84000 210000

17


village roads

Construction of road from Vala-Bellary road to Nedalikke Hoguva Road

180000 120000 300000 0 0 180000 120000 300000

18


village roads

Construction of road from Goudara Hosa Hola to Karki Holakke

180000 120000 300000 0 0 180000 120000 300000

19


village roads

Construction of raod going to Waddara Hola

60000 40000 100000 0 0 60000 40000 100000

20


village roads

Construction of road from Vala-Bellary main road to hatcholleru Via road

60000 40000 100000 0 0 60000 40000 100000

21

Formation of interior village roads and farm roads and

intra-village roads

Badiger land, Hanumanthappa,

Yankappa, Mudiyappa,

Kariyappa, Basappa, Mariyappa,

Gajjalagatta Dani

120000 80000

200000 0 0 120000 80000 200000




83

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



lands and others

22


intra-village roads

Yamunappa Agasar, Harijan yallamma,

Shivaraj, Balaganur Siddayya, Earanna

kattiger, Pompapathi, Katteppa & Durgappa

and others

0 0

120000 80000

200000 120000 80000 200000

23


intra-village roads

Many small and marginal farmers lands

0

300000 200000 500000 0 300000 200000 500000

24


intra-village roads

Dalapathi Earanna, Valabellary Tata land,

Yankappa & others

0 90000 60000

150000 0 90000 60000 150000

25


intra-village roads

Pompanagouda, Rajashekar,

Rudrappa and Others

0 540000 360000

900000 0 540000 360000 900000

26

formation of internal village roads and farm roads and

intera village roads

Formation of new road from main road to Navagram village (Joining road) 0

540000 360000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000

27



Improvement to the interior roads in RH No.5 (in village) 0

90000 60000 150000 0 90000 60000 150000

28



Apply Maram to the interior roads of Thimmapur vilalge 0

60000 40000 100000 0 60000 40000 100000

29



Formation of CC Road from Meti Basavanagouda House to Agasara 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000





Mukkanna House

30



Formation of CC Road from Gude kallu to Dodda Veerana gouda farm 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000

31



Formation of CC Road from Jawalagera Yankanagouda to Pampathi farm 0 0

60000 40000

100000 60000 40000 100000

32



Formation / Improvement of road from Bellary road to Pampanna farm 0 0

60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000

33


intera village roads Construction/Improvement of CC Road 120000 80000

200000 0 0 120000 80000 200000

34


intera village roads Construction of road in JD Road 60000 40000

100000 0 0 60000 40000 100000

Total 1026000 684000 1710000 3810000 2540000 6350000 990000 660000 1650000 5826000 3884000 9710000

IV Tree plantation 1

No work is executed during the year Tree plantation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRNAT TOTAL 2406000 1314000 3720000 5850000 3900000 9750000 3042000 2028000 5070000 11298000 7242000 18540000

Annex 6 Vegetable cultivation details

Sl. No. Name of the Group Name of the farmer

with father name Name of Village Name of GP Caste Sy No

Total Land at

Demo plot

Total land holding of

farmer (A-G)

Water source Area

decided for veg/ SRI

(A-G) Cell No

1 Anjaneyya Agriculture Interesting Group

Amreshappa S/o Eranna

Alabanur Alabanur Lingayat 9 1--0 5--0 Pump set 1.00 9663235680


Yankappa S/o Hanumantha

Alabanur Alabanur SC-Harijan 11 1--0 3--0 Pump set,Bore

1.00 9900416111


Ambanna S/o Huleshappa

Alabanur Alabanur SC-Harijan 12 0--20 3--0 Pump set,Bore

0.50 9900416111


G.Veeresh S/o Yankappa

Alabanur Alabanur Lingayat 137 0--27 0--27 Canal TBP 0.75 9972611691

5 Shivashakthi Agriculture Interesting Group

Amresh S/o Karibasappa

Kannari Alabanur Madiwar (Gen)

105 0--20 8--0 Pump set 0.50 9901088508


Basappa S/o Gadeppa Kannari Alabanur Kurubur(Gen) 54 1--20 5--20 Water Tank 1.50 9908454612


Dodda Ambanna S/o Sanna Hanumantha

Kannari Alabanur Bedre 0--10 2--0 Water Tank/TBP

0.25


Vishwanath Reddy S/oDoddabasangouda

Kannari Alabanur Lingayat 0--10 2--0 Pump set 0.25

9 Someshwar Agriculture Interesting Group

Doddan Gouda Belagurki/Indira Nagar

Alabanur Lingayat 64 1--00 29--30 Pump set 1.00


Bimal Sarkar S/o Haripado

Belagurki/Indira Nagar

Alabanur Namasudra 69 1--20 7--08 TBP, Water Tank

1.50 9008947041


Amal Sarkar S/o Adaitya Sarkar

Belagurki/Indira Nagar

Alabanur Namasudra 1--00 3--00 TBP, Water Tank

1.50

12 Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Hanumanthappa s/o devanna

Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar upper 146 20 gunts 20 acres Pump set 0.5 8105996026





Total Land at

Demo plot


farmer (A-G)

Water source Area


(A-G) Cell No

13 Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Shankrappa s/o balappa

Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar sc 120 20 gunts 5 acres Pump set 0.5 9902793757

14 Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Kariyappa s/o basappa Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar madival 120 30 gunts 10 acres Pump set 0.75

15 Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Pampapati s/o mariyappa

Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar kurabar 121 20 gunts 10 acres Pump set 0.5 9449689819

16 Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Candrappa s/o malleshappa

Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar sc 132 1 acres 6 Pump set 1

17 Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Hampayya s/o virabadrappa

Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar madival 143 1 acres 7acres Pump set 1

18 Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Mahadevappa s/o duragappa

Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar sc 133 1 acres 10 acres Pump set 1

19 Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Huligemma d/o yallappa

Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar sc 134 20 gunts 12 acres Pump set 0.5 9980329672

20 Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Yallappa d/o huligemma

Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar sc 134 20 gunts 4 acres Pump set 0.5

21 Udbal EJ village AIG Pampapati s/o duragappa

Udbal EJ Mad-Sirwar kabber 654 2 acres 6 acres Pump set 2 9620049912

22 Udbal EJ village AIG Yamanappa s/o yamanappa

Udbal EJ Mad-Sirwar sc 51 1 acres 9 acres Pump set 1 8951500209

23 Udbal EJ village AIG Gangappa s/o tippanna Udbal EJ Mad-Sirwar kabber 37 20 gunts 10 arces Pump set 0.5

24 Udbal EJ village AIG Veeresh s/o narasappa Udbal EJ Mad-Sirwar kabber 1 10 gunts 20 acres Pump set 0.25 9741971719

25 Budihal Village AIG Shivarayappa s/o nagavaleppa

Budihal Mad-Sirwar kurabar 95 20 gunts 5 acres Pump set 0.5 9980083035




87

JANAKALYAN SOCIETY



Total Land at

Demo plot


farmer (A-G)

Water source Area


(A-G) Cell No

26 Budihal Village AIG Mallappa s/o shivarayappa

Budihal Mad-Sirwar kurabar 82 20 gunts 6 acres Pump set 0.5 9902152696

27 Budihal Village AIG Virupanna s/o ramanna Budihal Mad-Sirwar sc 95 20 gunts 4 acres Pump set 0.5

28 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG)

Abanna Nayak s/o basanna

upper Giniwar Badarli 81 1 acrea 4 acres Pump set 0.5 9972446304


kumar swamy pujari s/o hanumappa

uppar Giniwar Badarli 81 1 acres 4 acres Pump set 0.25 9008721507


k. vereshappa gouda s/o siddareddyappa

other Giniwar Badarli 13 1acres 4acres Pump set 1 9945707388


Tippanna s/o Bimanna uppar Giniwar Badarli 81 1 acres 4acres Pump set 0.25


mallana gouda s/o mallareddyappa

othres Giniwar Badarli 116 1 acres 2acres Pump set 0.5


Devanna mulimani s/o Nagappa

uppar Giniwar Badarli 86 20 gunts 1 acres Pump set 1 9480444947


karilingappa s/o linganna

others Giniwar Badarli 80 20 gunts 2 acres Pump set 0.5


yankoba s/o yallappa uppar Giniwar Badarli 107 20 gunts 1 acres Pump set 1


shankrappa kambli s/o nagappa

kurabar Giniwar Badarli 80 10 gunts 2 acres Pump set 0.25


yankoba s/o sheshappa uppar Giniwar Badarli 107 20 gunts 1 acres Pump set 0.5


Ambresh s/o yamanappa

kurabar Giniwar Badarli 5 1 acres 6 acres Pump set 1





Total Land at

Demo plot


farmer (A-G)

Water source Area


(A-G) Cell No

39 Durgadevi Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG)

SARASWATI MANDAL W/O SATYAPRIYA

KSHATRIYA RH Colony No.5

Badarli 40/A 2 acres 4 ACRES FARM POND 2 8971511286


MADHUSUDHAN S/O PAGAL HALDAR


Badarli 68 20 gunts 2 acres FARM POND 2 9480169375


BISHWANAT BAR S/O GOVINDA BAR

MALO RH Colony No.5

Badarli 41 20 gunts 2.20 ACRES

FARM POND 0.5 9901778774


Khadu Mandal s/o Fhanibhusan mandal


Badarli 65.29 10 gunts 4 acres FARM POND 0.25


Jagadish bawali s/o Panchu bawali


Badarli 89/100 10 gunts 4 acres FARM POND 0.25 9731500739


Suresh biswas s/o sachin biswas

namasudra RH Colony No.5

Badarli 61bp3/4 5 gunta 1.2 FARM POND 0.12 9845039826

45 Sri.Channa Basava krishi Aasakta Gumpu (AIG)

Sharanappa yeldoni s/o Pampanna

Lingayat Haretanur Badarli 16 20 guntas 2.2 Pump set 0.5 9008727487


Amresh s/o Tippanna Nayak Haretanur Badarli 17 20 guntas 2 acra Pump set 0.5


Shiwangouda s/o Pampanna

Lingayat Haretanur Badarli 16 20 guntas 2.28 Pump set 0.5

Annex 7 List of newly elected Gram Panchayat Members

Sl. No Name of the GP member Village Gram Panchayat Designation

Alabanur Gram Panchayat 1 Nagamma Alabanur Alabanur G.P. Pres 2 E. Amaresh Alabanur Alabanur Member 3 Annapurnamma Alabanur Alabanur Member 4 Mallikarjun R Alabanur Alabanur Member 5 Manappa Alabanur Alabanur Member 6 Arunkumar Belagurki Alabanur Member 7 Pakiramma Belagurki Alabanur Member 8 Basavaraj Jinnad Belagurki Alabanur Member 9 Husenappa Belagurki Alabanur Member 10 Purnamma Belagurki Alabanur Member 11 Erappa Kannari Alabanur Member 12 Parvatamma Kannari Alabanur Member 13 Kadappa BR Camp Alabanur Member 14 Khadarbi BR Camp Alabanur Member

Madasirwar Gram Panchayat 1 Shivareddy Gomarci Madasirwar Member 2 Jilanipasha Gomarci Madasirwar Member 3 Basanagouda Gomarci Madasirwar Member 4 Ramesh Gomarci Madasirwar Member 5 Nagamma Udbal Madasirwar Member 6 Gangamma Udbal Madasirwar Member 7 BasavaraJ Madasirwar Madasirwar Member 8 Bheemanna Madasirwar Madasirwar Member 9 Aratemma Madasirwar Madasirwar Member 10 Lakshmi Madasirwar Madasirwar G.P.Pre 11 Sivarayappa Budihal Madasirwar Member 12 Shankramma Budihal Madasirwar Member 13 Hanumantha Budihal Madasirwar Member 14 Somappa Budihal Madasirwar Member

Badarli Gram Panchayat 1 Ranganagouda Valabellry Badarli G.P.Pre 2 Lingamma Valabellry Badarli Member 3 Shivalingamma Valabellry Badarli Member 3 Channabasava Badarli Badarli Member 4 Somappa Badarli Badarli Member 5 Durugamma Badarli Badarli Member 6 Rajashekar Haretanur Badarli Member 7 Sagarappa Haretanur Badarli Member 8 Husenamma Haretanur Badarli Member 9 Adappa Timmapur Badarli Member 10 Amarappa Timmapur Badarli Member 11 Devendrappa Timmapur Badarli Member 12 Yankamma Timmapur Badarli Member 13 Sharanabasava Hedaginal Badarli Member 14 Kupendra nayak Hedaginal Badarli Member 15 Basamma Hedaginal Badarli Member 16 Govindappa Hedaginal Badarli Member 17 Amaramma R.H.no.5 Badarli Member 18 Narad bairagi R.H.no.5 Badarli Member 19 Sharalamandal R.H.no.5 Badarli Member 20 Sarala R.H.no.5 Badarli Member 21 Uppalappa Ginivar Badarli Member 22 Uppalappa Ginivar Badarli Member 23 Gurulingamma Ginivar Badarli Member 24 Sridevi Ginivar Badarli Member 25 Mallayya Ginivar Badarli Member 26 Basamma Ginivar Badarli Member



Annex 8 Field Team responsible for making the program a grand success

Sl. No. Designation Name of the

staff Qualification Experience in NGO

Period of service

1 Project Officer Prasen Raptan B. Tech. (Ag.Engg.), PGDMN 14 years 01.02.2010 - till

date

2 Training Organizer Pranab Bala B.Com. LLB 6 years 01.02.2010 -

30.11.2010 Basavarajaiah Swami B.Com. 23 years 01.09.2010 - till

date

3 Agriculture Specialist Prasen Raptan B. Tech.(Ag.Engg.),

PGDMN 14 years 01.02.2010 - 30.11.2010

Sudhanya Sikdar VII 7 years 01.08.2010 - till

date

4 GPO – Alabanur

Manjushree N PUC 5 years 01.02.2010 -31.10.2010

Ramesh MSW 1 year 1.11.2010 – 31.1.2011

Pranab Mukherjee PUC 11 years 1.12.2010 – till

date

5 GPO – Badarli

Uma Rajur BSW 8 years 1.2.2010 – 30.8.2010

Suresh PUC 1 year 1.9.2010 – 31.10.2010

Amaresh MSW 1 year 1.11.2010 – 31.1.2011

Prahlad Biswas SSLC 4 years 1.2.2011 – till date

6 GPO – Madsirwar

Basavaraj N PUC 3 years 01.02.2010 -31.10.2010

Anjinappa MSW 1 year 1.11.2010 – 31.1.2011

Venkatesh A MSW 5 years 1.2.2011 – till date

7 Accounts Officer Manojit Biswas B.Com 5 years 01.02.2010 - till date

8 Documentation Officer Hulagappa B DCA 4 years 01.02.2010 - till date

Documents

Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive agriculture assets to make agriculture profit-making & sustainable Vol V