18
1/18 Leveraging SMEs’ Strenght for INSPIRE Glenn Vancauwenberghe (KU Leuven SADL) Piergiorgio Cipriano (EC JRC) Contributors: Giacomo Martirano (Epsilon Italia) Elena Roglia (EC JRC) Danny Vandenbroucke (KU Leuven SADL) INSPIRE Conference Firenze, June 27 th 2013

Leveraging SMEs’ Strenght for INSPIRE...2013/06/27  · 1/18 Leveraging SMEs’ Strenght for INSPIRE Glenn Vancauwenberghe (KU Leuven SADL) Piergiorgio Cipriano (EC JRC) Contributors:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1/18 Leveraging SMEs’ Strenght

    for INSPIRE

    Glenn Vancauwenberghe (KU Leuven SADL)

    Piergiorgio Cipriano

    (EC JRC)

    Contributors: Giacomo Martirano (Epsilon Italia)

    Elena Roglia (EC JRC) Danny Vandenbroucke (KU Leuven SADL)

    INSPIRE Conference

    Firenze, June 27th 2013

  • 2/18 key questions

    1. What is the size of the Geo-ICT sector in Europe? How many Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)? And how big is the market?

    2. What are the main characteristics of these Geo-ICT companies? And what are their core activities?

    3. How is the Geo-ICT sector currently involved in the implementation of INSPIRE?

    4. Do Geo-ICT sector companies in Europe have the skills and knowledge to participate in the implementation of INSPIRE?

    5. Does INSPIRE already have an impact on the innovative performance of Geo-ICT companies in Europe?

  • 3/18 smeSpire project

    Rationale of smeSpire project (May 2012 – April 2014):

    SMEs can enable countries to fulfill the INSPIRE Directive, creating new market opportunities with increased potential for innovation and new jobs.

    Objective of the project: “to encourage and enable the participation of SMEs in the mechanisms of harmonizing and making geodata available.”

    Activities:

    1. STUDY : Assess the market potential for SMEs 2. TRAINING: Develop a multilingual training package 3. BEST PRACTICES: Collect and exploit a BP Catalogue 4. TRANSFER: Create a network capable of transferring result-

    driven knowledge throughout Europe

  • 4/18 smeSpire study

  • 5/18

    source: EC-JRC, 2007, Mapping the ICT in EU Regions http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1554

    ICT SMEs in Europe

    ICT SMEs 480,000 (Eurostat, 2009)

    “micro” (< 10empl.) 90%

    Total turnover 400bln€

    Employees: 2.9 million

    smeSpire estimation:

    up to 2% of ICT SMEs dealing with GI

    http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1554

  • 6/18 Geo-ICT SMEs in Europe

    source: http://www.smespire.eu/map/smes/map.html

    Employees “small” (< 50 empl.) 90%

    “micro” (

  • 7/18 year of foundation

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    % o

    f co

    mp

    anie

    s fo

    un

    de

    d -

    pe

    r ye

    ar

    a: Oracle (1978), dbf (1979) b: ArcInfo, AutoCAD (1982), MapInfo (1985) c: www (1990), Mosaic browser (1993) d: US Ex.Order 12906, OGC (1994), ArcView 1, Java (1995), shapefile , Mapquest (1996) e: OSM (2004), GoogleMaps, PostGIS (2005), OpenLayers (2006)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

    Cu

    mu

    lati

    ve %

    of

    com

    pan

    ies

    Timeline

    a b

    c

    d

    e

  • 8/18 activities & customers

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

    Education

    Implementation of network services

    General IT consultancy

    Data modeling

    Transformation of spatial data

    Development of client applications

    Use of spatial data

    all activities

    primary activity

    Customers? • Public sector as the main customer for most companies (60%) • Public authorities at local/regional/national level in their own country

  • 9/18 knowledge of INSPIRE

    Current awareness of INSPIRE “Well, ... yes, I have heard”

    31%

    69% No

    Yes

  • 10/18 knowledge of INSPIRE

    Knowledge in the organization of INSPIRE and INSPIRE regulation

    • Knowledge of general objectives and principles is high • Regulations about “Data” and “Network services” are less known

    Objectives

    Main Principles

    Conceptual Framework

    Metadata regulation

    Data and Service regulation

    Network Services regulation

    Interoperability of spatial data sets and…

    Monitoring and reporting obligations regulation

    5.0

    1.8

    2.1

    1.4

    1.4

    2.5

    3.2

    6.4

    18.1

    18.5

    21.7

    20.3

    19.9

    18.9

    16.7

    22.1

    45.9

    44.5

    36.3

    35.6

    35.2

    31.0

    35.2

    23.8

    Very low / low Average High / very high

  • 11/18 INSPIRE involvement

    Current involvement in INSPIRE Only 1/3 of participant companies is directly involved in INSPIRE activities: • most of them as a contractor of public authorities • some of them as member of interest communities or expert in thematic

    working groups

    34%

    66% Yes

    No

  • 12/18 INSPIRE involvement

    Current development of INSPIRE compliant components (%)

    • Companies mainly involved in development of view services and data modeling (both 26%) and metadata catalogue (21%)

    • Lowest involvement is on schema transformation (9.6%)

    26.0

    16.4

    21.0

    16.0

    26.0

    17.1 15.3

    9.6

    12.1

    16.4

  • 13/18 impact of INSPIRE

    Changes already occurred and/or foreseen due to INSPIRE Directive

    • impact of INSPIRE already quite high, and expected to increase in future • current impact related to introduction of new products/services • future impact related to new products/services and new customers

    Introduction of new or significantly improvedproducts/services

    New or significantly improved methods ofproducing products/services

    Delivery of products/services to new customergroups/geographic markets

    Delivery of products/services in less time orlower cost

    42.0

    33.5

    31.7

    28.1

    73.7

    67.3

    71.9

    66.2

    Foreseen Occurred

  • 14/18 barriers to innovation

    Lack of funds within your enterprise or group

    Lack of finance from sources outside your enterprise

    Innovation costs too high

    Lack of qualified personnel

    Lack of information on technology

    Difficulty in finding cooperation partners for innovation

    Market dominated by established enterprises

    Uncertain demand for innovative products or services

    23.1

    19.9

    35.9

    25.6

    20.3

    31.0

    24.9

    31.3

    27.8

    30.2

    23.1

    19.6

    10.3

    21.7

    28.8

    35.2

    13.2

    13.9

    5.7

    2.8

    2.5

    5.0

    18.5

    9.6

    Average High Very high

    Barriers that hinder or prevent innovation

    • Main barrier: dominance of market by established enterprises • Several barriers related to financial aspects • Internal and external barriers

  • 15/18

    34%

    66% Yes

    No

    R&D and innovation projects

    EU co-funded research

    Only 1/3 of participant companies was involved in co-funded R&D projects in 2011: • 65% of them in 7th Framework Programme (FP7) • 23% of them with co-funded annual budget lower than 10K€ • 10% of them with co-funded annual budget between 100K€ and 500K€

  • 16/18 R&D and innovation projects

    FP7 projects (all topics) In the period 2007-2012 there were: • 18,000 projects founded • more than 40,000 participant organizations • 31bln€ funded by EU FP7 projects dealing with GI ~200 projects with direct focus on Geographic Information: • search on Cordis web site: “inspire” or “geoss” or “gmes” or “spatial” or “geo” • more than 1,000 participants • 482mln€ • 381 EU27 cities involved

    SMEs difficulties Very hard for SMEs to participate in EU-funded projects: • barriers in creating or entering a consortium and make proposals • advance payments are very low • Percentage of SMEs’ funded budget is very low (14% of total*)

    * smeSpire elaboration on ICT FP7 projects only (http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7)

    http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/ict-research-projects-under-eu-fp7

  • 17/18 R&D and innovation activities

    FP7 projects regarding “Geoinformation”: lines represent connections between partners involved (colour and width measure the amount of EC funding received from by each city-partner from each city-coordinator)

  • 18/18 thank you!

    Questions, comments?

    Want to participate?

    smeSpire study: • JRC: Piergiorgio Cipriano, Max Craglia, Elena Roglia, Paul Smits • KU Leuven: Glenn Vancauwenberghe, Danny Vandenbroucke

    smeSpire project: • Coordinator: Giacomo Martirano (Epsilon Italia) • www.smespire.eu • @smespire • smespire

    http://www.smespire.eu/