3
LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE) Andrei Sourakov and Thomas C. Emmel McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, asourakov@flmnh.ufl.edu Abstract Partial life history and dividing chromosomes are described and illustrated for a rare highland satyrine from Nepal, Paralasa nepalica Paulus. These characters, heretofore unknown for the genus Paralasa, are discussed in the context of the modern perception of the phylogenetic position of the genus. Key words: chromosome, egg, Erebia, Erebiina, evolution, karyology, larva, morphology, Nepal, Nymphalidae, Paralasa, systematics, Satyrinae, Ypthima, Ypthimina, Scanning Electron Microscopy. The basic chromosome number for Satyrinae, according to numerous studies, seems to fall within narrow limits of n=30, with n=29 being the predominant number (e. g., Robbinson, Kudrna, ed., 1990, Brown et al., 2007). However, some genera show great variation in this character, which variation in the past has been successfully applied to systematics (e.g., Lorkovic, 1972; Lukhtanov, 1987). The genus Erebia, for instance, exhibits remarkable variation in chromosome numbers even within a single species group. Thus, in the E. tyndarus group, the chromosome number varies from n=8 (E. calcarius Lork.) to n=51 (E. iranica Gr. Gr.) (Lorkovic, 1961). This species group has become a textbook example of speciation in butterflies (e. g., Descimon and Mallet, 2008). Many Erebia species, however, have 28-29 chromosomes and, probably due to the fusion of several chromosomes, numbers in the lower 20s are also frequently observed. The genus Paralasa Moore was separated from Erebia in 1883, and Warren (1936) distinguished these two genera by male genitalia characters. Though Miller (1968) shows unequivocally that Paralasa belongs to the Callerebia series of Ypthimina, many authors continue to refer to it as a subgenus of Erebia (e.g. Schetkin and Schetkin, 1991), probably mostly as a result of similar ecology and distribution, rather than in consideration of morphology of Paralasa. The recent molecular phylogeny of Satyrinae (Peña et al., 2006) supports Miller’s placement of Paralasa within Ypthimina as a sister of the Old World genus Ypthima. Here, we provide illustrations of the partial life history and karyotype of one of the rare, recently described (Paulus, 1983) Paralasa species, P. nepalica, from the Himalayas of northwestern Nepal. As far as we know, this is the first information of this kind for the genus. MATERIALS AND METHODS The first author collected the specimens of P. nepalica in June 1997 above Phoksumdo village, Dolpa Province, Nepal, at the elevation of 3,500 m. Females were kept alive and fed daily with sugar solution. They laid eggs on the dry stems of grass supplied to them randomly. Eggs and first instar larvae were preserved in alcohol. The larvae refused to feed on the grasses randomly offered to them, thus we can conclude that they are oligophagous in nature. Preserved material was subjected to critical point drying and examined using a Hitachi Scanning Electron Microscope. Testes of live, wild-caught males were removed with fine dissecting forceps and fixed in vials containing 3:1 alcohol: acetic acid (Emmel 1969). Upon returning from the field the vials containing the testes were stored at -20°F until processing in the Gainesville laboratory. For microscopic observation, testes were stained with lacto-aceto-orcein, and squashed under a press until the testicular material was approximately one cell layer thick. Preparations were examined with a Carl Zeiss Research Microscope Standard WL fitted with 25x, 40x, and 100x planapochromatic flatfield objectives and automatic camera (refer to Emmel 1969 for further details). All uniformly spread metaphase plates of each individual were counted in order to verify the count and determine any variation within a particular specimen. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The chromosome count, based on two P. nepalica individuals, shows that haploid chromosome number in this species is n=10 (Fig. 1). This number is also not unusual for Erebia (e. g. E. cassioides), and, probably, represents a derived character state. Among Satyrinae the chromosome number n=10 is known in Auca nycteropus (while Auca coctei has n=20), in Pampasatyrus ocelloides (while Pampasatyrus nilesi has n=41), in Erebia cassioides (while other species of Erebia have from n=8 to n=52) (Brown et al., 2007; Robinson, 1971). It is clear that this chromosome number (n=10) evolved independently at least three times in Satyrinae, and thus, being homoplesious, as a character has limited use for phylogenetic reconstruction. Chromosome __________________________________ Fig. 1 Dividing meiotic chromosomes of Paralasa nepalica, n=10. 40 SOURAKOV & EMMEL: Paralasa: life history and karyology TROP. LEPID. RES., 18(1):40-42, 2008

LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA · 2015. 3. 19. · LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE) Andrei Sourakov and Thomas

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA · 2015. 3. 19. · LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE) Andrei Sourakov and Thomas

LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE)

Andrei Sourakov and Thomas C. EmmelMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, [email protected]

Abstract – Partial life history and dividing chromosomes are described and illustrated for a rare highland satyrine from Nepal, Paralasa nepalica Paulus. These characters, heretofore unknown for the genus Paralasa, are discussed in the context of the modern perception of the phylogenetic position of the genus.

Key words: chromosome, egg, Erebia, Erebiina, evolution, karyology, larva, morphology, Nepal, Nymphalidae, Paralasa, systematics, Satyrinae, Ypthima, Ypthimina, Scanning Electron Microscopy.

The basic chromosome number for Satyrinae, according to numerous studies, seems to fall within narrow limits of n=30, with n=29 being the predominant number (e. g., Robbinson, Kudrna, ed., 1990, Brown et al., 2007). However, some genera show great variation in this character, which variation in the past has been successfully applied to systematics (e.g., Lorkovic, 1972; Lukhtanov, 1987). The genus Erebia, for instance, exhibits remarkable variation in chromosome numbers even within a single species group. Thus, in the E. tyndarus group, the chromosome number varies from n=8 (E. calcarius Lork.) to n=51 (E. iranica Gr. Gr.) (Lorkovic, 1961). This species group has become a textbook example of speciation in butterflies (e. g., Descimon and Mallet, 2008). Many Erebia species, however, have 28-29 chromosomes and, probably due to the fusion of several chromosomes, numbers in the lower 20s are also frequently observed.

The genus Paralasa Moore was separated from Erebia in 1883, and Warren (1936) distinguished these two genera by male genitalia characters. Though Miller (1968) shows unequivocally that Paralasa belongs to the Callerebia series of Ypthimina, many authors continue to refer to it as a subgenus of Erebia (e.g. Schetkin and Schetkin, 1991), probably mostly as a result of similar ecology and distribution, rather than in consideration of morphology of Paralasa. The recent molecular phylogeny of Satyrinae (Peña et al., 2006) supports Miller’s placement of Paralasa within Ypthimina as a sister of the Old World genus Ypthima.

Here, we provide illustrations of the partial life history and karyotype of one of the rare, recently described (Paulus, 1983) Paralasa species, P. nepalica, from the Himalayas of northwestern Nepal. As far as we know, this is the first information of this kind for the genus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first author collected the specimens of P. nepalica in June 1997 above Phoksumdo village, Dolpa Province, Nepal, at the elevation of 3,500 m. Females were kept alive and fed daily with sugar solution. They laid eggs on the dry stems of grass supplied to them randomly. Eggs and first instar larvae were preserved in alcohol. The larvae refused to feed on the grasses randomly offered to them, thus we can conclude that they are oligophagous in nature. Preserved material was subjected to critical point drying and examined using a Hitachi Scanning Electron Microscope. Testes of live, wild-caught males were removed with fine dissecting forceps and fixed in vials containing 3:1 alcohol: acetic acid (Emmel 1969). Upon returning from the field the vials containing

the testes were stored at -20°F until processing in the Gainesville laboratory. For microscopic observation, testes were stained with lacto-aceto-orcein, and squashed under a press until the testicular material was approximately one cell layer thick. Preparations were examined with a Carl Zeiss Research Microscope Standard WL fitted with 25x, 40x, and 100x planapochromatic flatfield objectives and automatic camera (refer to Emmel 1969 for further details). All uniformly spread metaphase plates of each individual were counted in order to verify the count and determine any variation within a particular specimen.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The chromosome count, based on two P. nepalica individuals, shows that haploid chromosome number in this species is n=10 (Fig. 1). This number is also not unusual for Erebia (e. g. E. cassioides), and, probably, represents a derived character state. Among Satyrinae the chromosome number n=10 is known in Auca nycteropus (while Auca coctei has n=20), in Pampasatyrus ocelloides (while Pampasatyrus nilesi has n=41), in Erebia cassioides (while other species of Erebia have from n=8 to n=52) (Brown et al., 2007; Robinson, 1971). It is clear that this chromosome number (n=10) evolved independently at least three times in Satyrinae, and thus, being homoplesious, as a character has limited use for phylogenetic reconstruction. Chromosome

__________________________________

Fig. 1 Dividing meiotic chromosomes of Paralasa nepalica, n=10.

40 SOURAKOV & EMMEL: Paralasa: life history and karyology TROP. LEPID. RES., 18(1):40-42, 2008

Page 2: LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA · 2015. 3. 19. · LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE) Andrei Sourakov and Thomas

numbers known for Ypthima are n=24, 27, and 29, representing a common, perhaps ancestral satyrine number. Brown et al. (2007) state that “a chromosome number change is very unlikely to become fixed in a large, outbreeding population. The novel karyotype must somehow land in a small population, with an effective size of a few individuals. This small population must remain reproductively isolated from other members of the species for a long enough period, at least for two generations. The novel karyotype can then become fixed in individuals homozygous for it through inbreeding.” If this is correct, the genus Paralasa represents an ideal model for chromosomal change. Isolated in high mountain valleys, these butterflies are weak fliers and probably disperse through founding females, whose offspring remain in isolation for prolonged periods of time.

The immature stages illustrated here support an affinity of Paralasa with the genus Erebia, rather than with Ypthima. Paralasa nepalica has the egg sculptured with vertical ribs (Fig. 2), which is typical of Erebia. The egg is cream colored with pink spots. The head of the first instar larva is reticulate, with short setae, not unlike those found in Erebia (Fig. 3). On the contrary, in Ypthima, the first instar larvae have a smooth head with very long setae and light reticulation. Their eggs are like those of Pronophilina and some Maniolina: thin-walled spheres that are supported by irregularly shaped or hexagonal sculpturing (Sourakov and Emmel, 1996). The ribbed, robust structure of the Paralasa egg is probably an ancestral characteristic, as it is found in many subfamilies of Nymphalidae and in different tribes of Satyrinae (e.g. Cercyonis of Maniolina (Sourakov, 1995), Chazara of Satyrina, Erebia of Erebiina (e. g., Hasselbarth et al., 1995)). To conclude, while novel characteristics for the genus Paralasa that are described here are similar to these of Erebia, we found no new evidence supporting its affinity with Ypthimina.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the late former director of the Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation of Nepal, Tirtha Man Maskey for his support and the staff of the department for issuing collecting and exportation permits. Peter Eliazar performed the chromosome count. We thank Jack Cox and his field assistants Dirga, Terendra, and Nabin, for providing companionship on the first author’s 60-day-long expedition in the highlands of Nepal, where many challenges were overcome by their humor, experience and bravery. Vladimir Lukhtanov, André Freitas, and Keith Willmott kindly reviewed the manuscript and offered helpful suggestions.

REFERENCES CITED

Bozano, G.C. 1999. Guide to the butterflies of the Palearctic region: Satyridae. Part 2,

subfamily Satyrinae, tribe Ypthimini: Argestina, Boeberia, Callerebia, Grumia, Hemadara, Loxerebia, Paralasa, Proterebia. Pp.58. Omnes Artes; Milano.

Brown K. S. Jr., A. V. L. Freitas, Von Schoultz B., Saura A. O., Saura A. 2007. Chromosomal evolution of South American frugivorous butterflies in the

Satyroid clade (Nymphalidae: Charaxinae, Morphinae and Satyrinae) Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92:467–481.

Descimon H. and J. Mallet 2008. In: Ecology of Butterflies in Europe (eds. Settele, et. al.). Cambridge

University Press. (in press). (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/jim/pap/descimon&mallet07.pdf)

Emmel, T. C. 1969. Methods for studying the chromosomes of Lepidoptera. J. Res. Lepid. 7:

23-28.Hesselbarth, G., H. van Oorschot, and S. Wagener 1995. Die Tagfalter der Türkei, unter Berücksichtigung der Angenzenden

Länder. Bocholt: S. Wagener. 3 volumes.Kudrna, O., editor 1990. Butterflies of Europe, Vol. 2, AULA-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden, 557pp.Lorkovic, Z. 1961. Abstufungen der reproductiven Isolationsmechanismen in der Erebia

tyndarus Gruppe und deren Systematic. Proc. Int. Congr. Ent. 11(Vienna) 1: 134-142.

Fig. 2-3. Scanning electron micrograph of egg and first instar larval head of Paralasa nepalica.

SOURAKOV & EMMEL: Paralasa: life history and karyology TROP. LEPID. RES., 18(1):40-42, 2008 41

Page 3: LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA · 2015. 3. 19. · LIFE HISTORY AND KARYOLOGY OF PARALASA NEPALICA (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, SATYRINAE) Andrei Sourakov and Thomas

Lorkovic Z. 1972. Karyological identification of the Caucasian species of the Erebia

tyndarus group (Lepidopt., Satyridae). Acta Entomol. Jugosi., 8: 1-2, 111-121.

Lukhtanov V.A. 1987. Systematics and phylogeny of Caucasian and Siberian forms of the Erebia

tyndarus group (Lepidoptera, Satyridae) with regards for karyological data. Zool. Zh., 66(5):692-700.

Miller L. D. 1968. The higher classification, phylogeny and zoogeography of the Satyridae

(Lepidoptera), Memoirs of the American Entomological Soc., Pp. 174.

Fig. 4 (top). Adult male of Paralasa nepalica. The red coloration of the underside, normally hidden, is exposed by a torn hindwing.

Fig. 5 (bottom) Typical habitat of Paralasa nepalica is in the hills surrounding this village, Doh Tarap, located above 4,000 m elevation in Dolpa, northwestern Nepal.

Paulus H. F. 1983: Paralasa nepalica n. sp. aus den Trockengebieten NW-Nepals (Insecta:

Lepidoptera: Satyridae: Erebiinae). Senckenbergiana Biologica Volume: 63(5-6): 337-346

Peña C., N. Wahlberg, E. Weingartner, U. Kodandaramaiah, S. Nylin, A. V.L. Freitas, and A. V.Z. Brower

2006. Higher level phylogeny of Satyrinae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on DNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 40:29-49.

Robinson, R. 1971. Lepidoptera Genetics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Schetkin, Yu. L.; Schetkin, Yu. Yu. 1991. New data on the species of Paralasa Moore subgenus in Pamiro-Alai

(Lepidoptera, Satyridae). Doklady Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoi SSR. 34(1):63-65.

Sourakov A. 1995. Systematics, evolutionary biology and population genetics of the

Cercyonis pegala Group (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Holarctic Lepidoptera, 2(1): 1-21.

Sourakov A. and T. C. Emmel 1997. Ypthima and Ypthimomorpha: their immature stages and taxonomic

relationships (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). In Contributions to Studies of West African Butterflies. (Sourakov, editor). Tropical Lepidoptera, 8(Supplement 3):23-28.

Warren, B. C. S. 1936. Monograph of the genus Erebia. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., London, 407pp.,

104pl.Wesley D. J. and T. C. Emmel 1975. The chromosomes of neotropical butterflies from Trinidad and Tobago.

Biotropica, 7(1):24-31.

42 SOURAKOV & EMMEL: Paralasa: life history and karyology TROP. LEPID. RES., 18(1):40-42, 2008