40
The Supramolecular NanoMaterials Group Ligand coated metal nanoparticles and quantum dots Francesco Stellacci Department of Materials Science and Engineering [email protected]

Ligand coated metal nanoparticles and quantum dots Supramolecular Nano‐Materials Group Ligand coated metal nanoparticles and quantum dots Francesco Stellacci Department of Materials

  • Upload
    ngonhi

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The  Supramolecular  Nano‐Materials  Group

Ligand coated metal nanoparticles and quantum dots

Francesco StellacciDepartment of Materials Science

and [email protected]

S u N M a G

Outline

• Self-Assembled Monolayers

• SAM coated nanomaterials

• Mixed SAM coated nanomaterials

• Quantum dots

S u N M a G

Self-Assembly

S u N M a G

Protein Self-Assembly

S u N M a G

Molecular Self-Assembly

S u N M a G

Thiolated Monolayers on Gold

Sδ- - Auδ+ bond energy = 1.34 eV

However, 2 S - Au bonds are not much stronger than one S - S disulfide bond and one Au - Au metallic bond

A monolayer in solution therefore develops an equilibrium

2 * RS - Au

RS - SR + Au - Au (surface)

dodecane solution

S u N M a G

Molecular Self-Assembly

S u N M a G

Commensurate vs. Incommensurate

S u N M a G

Wetting Properties

S u N M a G

Wetting Properties II

S u N M a G

Etch Pits and Defects

S u N M a G

Phase Separation

S u N M a G

Metal Nanoparticles Synthesis

Metal Salt (AuHCl4) + HS

Reducing Agent (NaBH4)+HS

Ligand exchange reaction*

Direct mixed ligands reaction**

A. C. Templeton, M. P. Wuelfing and R. W. Murray, Accounts Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 27F. Stellacci, et al. Adv. Mat. 2002, 14, 194

S u N M a G

Characterizing Metal Nanoparticles

2.7 nm

3 nm

TEM shows atoms in the core STM shows ligands in the shell

S u N M a G

Au (111)

STM Height Image of OT/MPA Mixed Monolayer on Au(111)

Mixed SelfMixed Self--Assembled MonolayersAssembled Monolayers

5 nm

Randomly distributed domains of OT form in a surrounding matrix of MPA

MPA

OT

R. Smith, S. Reed, P. Lewis, J. Monnell, R. Clegg, K. Kelly, L. Bumm, J. Huthison, P. Weiss. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 1119-1122.

SHCOOH SH

S u N M a G

Ordered Domains on NPs

Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Ripples Form by Spontaneous Self-Assembly

SH

MPA

OT

SHCOOH

S u N M a G

Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Ripples

Hydrophobic Region:

Methyl Terminated Molecules

Hydrophilic Region:

Carboxylic Acid Terminated Molecules

S u N M a G

Solid interdigitated state

Solid de-interdigitated state

ΔHde-int

Particle Particle InterdigitationInterdigitation

S u N M a G

XX--Ray DiffractionRay Diffraction

2:1 OT:MPA Au np(5:1 Au:ligand)

2:1 OT:MPA (Ag np) (2:1 Au:ligand)

S u N M a G

Phase Separation on NanoparticlesPhase Separation on Nanoparticles

OT:MPA

OT:MUA

SH NH2SH NH2

Hexanethiol: p-Aminothiophenol

SH OH

O

SH

SH

Ag core

SH

OT:Mercaptohexanol

SHOH

S u N M a G

Core Effect

3 nm

S u N M a G

Ripple Spacing in OT:MPA System

Morphology ranges from discretely packed domains to defect rich ripples to perfect ripples.

S u N M a G

Evolution of Surface MorphologyEvolution of Surface Morphology

OT:MPA 10:1DT:MPA 2:1

S u N M a G

Solubility and Morphology

0

1

2

3

4

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

MPA / (OT+MPA)

Solu

bilit

y

RipplesDomains Domains

Perfect OrderingDefect-Rich Defect-Rich

Note: Solubility Decreases with Increasing %MPA due to Morphology

S u N M a G

Ripple Spacing in OT:MPA System

Morphology ranges from discretely packed domains to defect rich ripples to perfect ripples.

S u N M a G

Surface Chemistry Modification

Highly soluble in Toluene

Highly soluble in Ethanol

HS

HS OH

O

HS

O

OH

S u N M a G

Protein Nonspecific AbsorptionProteins can assume a few possible conformations as determined by molecular structure

Hydrophilic regionHydrophobic region

1) Maximizes exposure of hydrophobic region

2) Minimizes exposure ofhydrophobic region

Hydrophilic Surface Hydrophobic Surface

Surface composed of Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Domains

S u N M a G

The Nano Lotus Leaf Effect

Size of hydrophobic/hydrophilic regions of protein are greater than size scale of ligand domains on the nanoparticles.

Proteins are conformationally frustratedand cannot adsorb to nanoparticle surface.

S u N M a G

Cytochrome C: a large Protein

Extensive Adsorption of Protein onto Monolayer

Protein24 h

No Adsorption of Protein

3.6 x 3.6 x 13.7 nm

Protein24 h

S u N M a G

Lysozyme: a small Protein

4.5 x 3.0 x 3.0 nm

Protein24 h

Protein24 h

Extensive Adsorption of Protein onto Monolayer

No Adsorption of Protein

S u N M a G

Curvature EffectsCurvature Effects

Increasing Curvature

Flat Au (111) on Mica

OT:MPA Mixed Monolayers formed on surfaces of varying curvatures

Au on Si, with 20 nm hemispheres

Au film with Au crystals ~ 10 nm

Au film with Au crystals ~ 4 nm

10 nm 10 nm 5 nm 5 nm

S u N M a G

Synthesis and Conformation

Nanoparticles obtained via the two-step method

Nanoparticles obtained via the one-step method

Metal Salt (AuHCl4) +

NaBH4

HS SH COOH

(AuSR)n

Metal Salt (AuHCl4) + HS

NaBH4

SH COOH

S u N M a G

Kinetic Effect

Au thermally evaporated on Si

SAM formed in the absence of(AuSR)n SAM formed in the presence of (AuSR)n

S u N M a G

Other Monolayers

S u N M a G

Other Monolayers II

S u N M a G

S u N M a G

Size Control

S u N M a G

Optical Properties

S u N M a G

Artificial Atoms

S u N M a G