9
Supporting information Supplementary Table 1—Construction of gene fragments and multi- fragment genes. Supplementary Table 2—Primers and synthetic nucleotide sequences. Supplementary Table 3—The A 450 values of 40 negative chicken sera tested by BE-ELISA. Supplementary Figure 1—Optimization of BE-ELISA conditions. a The optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and 8 μg/ml), with 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500, and 1:2000 dilutions of IBV- positive serum and that of chicken negative serum. b Based on these results, the optimal dilution of HRP-conjugated donkey anti-chicken antibody was analyzed at dilutions from 1:2000 to 1:50,000. c Using the optimized dilutions, the type of blocking buffer was then optimized. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

  • Upload
    dohuong

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supporting information

Supplementary Table 1—Construction of gene fragments and multi-fragment genes.

Supplementary Table 2—Primers and synthetic nucleotide sequences.

Supplementary Table 3—The A450 values of 40 negative chicken sera tested by BE-ELISA.

Supplementary Figure 1—Optimization of BE-ELISA conditions. a The optimal antigen concentration and

serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and 8 μg/ml),

with 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500, and 1:2000 dilutions of IBV-positive serum and that of chicken

negative serum. b Based on these results, the optimal dilution of HRP-conjugated donkey anti-chicken

antibody was analyzed at dilutions from 1:2000 to 1:50,000. c Using the optimized dilutions, the type of

blocking buffer was then optimized.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Page 2: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supporting information

Supplementary Table 1 Construction of gene fragments and multi-fragment genes

Nam

e

Description Construction and product size Constructed

plasmids a

E4 181–210 AA (M gene) PCR using primers E4-F and E4-R; 114 bp pE4-19T

E5 6–88 AA (N gene) PCR using primers E5-F and E5-R; 279 bp pE5-19T

E6 118–133 AA (N gene) Constructed using two synthesized nucleotide strands (E6-F and E6-

R) with its sequence optimized for better translation in Escherichia

coli

E7 218–264 AA (N gene) PCR using primers E7-F and E7-R; 165 bp pE7-19T

E8 304–385 AA (N gene) PCR using primers E8-F and E8-R; 273 bp pE8-19T

E1/2/3 Splice product of three S

fragments (E1, E2, and E3) b

PCR using primers E1-F c and E1/2/3-R; 402 bp pE1/2/3-19T

E4/5 Splice product of E4 and E5 PCR using primers E4-F and E5-R; 381 bp pE4/5-19T

E6/7/8 Splice product of E6, E7, and

E8

PCR using primers E6/7/8-F and E8-R; 480 bp pE6/7/8-19T

BE Splice product of E1–E8 PCR using primers E1-F c and E8-R; 1239 bp pBE-19T; pET32a-BE

NE Splice product of E5–E8 PCR using primers NE-F and E8-R; 741 bp pNE-19T; PGEX-NE

12

13

Page 3: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

a The vectors used in this study included pMD19-T, pET32a(+), and PGEX-4T-1

b,c The three S fragments (E1, E2, and E3) and primer E1-F were described in our previous work (Ding et

al. 2015)

14

15

16

Page 4: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supplementary Table 2 Primers and synthetic nucleotide sequences

Name Sequence (5' to 3') Restriction site

E4-F ATAGCCGGCAGTAGTTATCGTATGGTGCAG Nae I

E4-R AAAGGCGCCAGTGTCTACTGACTGCTTT NarI

E5-F TATGGCGCCTCTAGTGCAACTGGAAAGAC NarI

E5-R ATAGGGCCCACTACTTGGGACTGATTTTCT Apa I

E6-F CGCGAAAGGTGCGGACACCAAATCTCGTTCTAACCAGGGTA

CCCGTGACGG Apa I and NarI

E6-R CGCCGTCACGGGTACCCTGGTTAGAACGAGATTTGGTGTCCG

CACCTTTCGCGGGCC

E7-F TATGGCGCCTCTTCTAAGGCCGATGAAAT NarI

E7-R TGAGCCGGCCTTAATACCTTCCTCATTC Nae I

E8-F ATAGCCGGCAGTTCTACTGTGGTCCCAC Nae I

E8-R CCCCTCGAGCTA ATTGTTCCTCTCCTCAT Xho I

E1/2/3-R TAAGCCGGCCGGAACGATGGT Nae I

E6/7/8-F AATGGGCCCGCGAAAGGTGC Apa I

NE-F ATAGGATCCGCAACTGGAAAGACAGACGC BamH I

Letters underlined indicate restriction sites, in italic indicate flexible amino acid sequences

17

18

Page 5: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supplementary Table 3 The A450 values of 40 negative chicken sera tested by BE-ELISA

Sera

number

A450 value

1-4 0.17 0.13 0.139 0.069

5-8 0.104 0.106 0.15 0.111

9-12 0.094 0.071 0.155 0.074

13-16 0.094 0.068 0.073 0.124

17-20 0.184 0.119 0.084 0.142

21-24 0.154 0.091 0.086 0.086

25-28 0.11 0.139 0.079 0.09

29-32 0.084 0.078 0.065 0.152

33-36 0.201 0.112 0.082 0.087

37-40 0.168 0.176 0.105 0.092

Forty negative chicken sera diluted at 1:1500 were tested by BE-ELISA. The mean A450 value and SD were

calculated as 0.112 and 0.037, respectively. Thus, the cut-off value using mean ± 3 SD was defined as

0.223

19

20

21

22

Page 6: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supplementary Figure 1 Optimization of BE-ELISA conditions. “P” and “N” indicate the A450 value of IBV-

positive serum (China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control) and chicken negative serum, respectively.

They were tested in triplicate for each condition, and mean values ± SD are shown. “P/N” indicates the

ratio between the P and N values. Optimal working conditions were determined to be those that yielded

the highest P/N value. a The optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by

checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and 8 μg/ml), with 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:1500,

and 1:2000 dilutions of IBV-positive serum and that of chicken negative serum. The combination that

yielded the highest P/N value was an antigen concentration of 3.43 μg/ml and a serum dilution of

1:1500. b Based on these results, the optimal dilution of HRP-conjugated donkey anti-chicken antibody

was analyzed at a dilution range from 1:2000 to 1:50,000. A dilution of 1:10,000 was determined to be

the optimal dilution. c Using the optimized dilutions, the type of blocking buffer was next optimized.

Buffers 1 to 5 represent 1 % (w/v) gelatin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 5 % (w/v) skimmed milk

powder in PBS, 10 % (w/v) skimmed milk powder in PBS, 1 % (w/v) BSA in PBS, and 0.5 % (w/v) BSA in

PBS, respectively. The buffer with 5 % (w/v) skimmed milk powder in PBS was found to yield the best

results

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

Page 7: link.springer.com10.1007/s10529... · Web viewThe optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution were determined by checkerboard titration of antigen BE (1.2, 2.4, 3.43, 6, and

Supplementary Figure 138

39

40