Liquidity & Leverage Analysis

Page 1 of 53

Virtual University of Pakistan

Evaluation Sheet for Project

Fall 2011

FIN619: Final Project (Finance) Credit Hours:3

Student’s Name: Muhammad Sohail Ahmad

Student’s ID: MC100206352

Evaluation Criteria Result

Proposal Valid

Final Project Pass

Written Work Status Pass

Presentation & Viva Voce

Final Result

Page 2 of 53

Pass Dear student,

Some deficiencies have been highlighted in your Project , but keeping in view of your over

all work, you are declared PASS in your written work. Review the evaluated report and improve your work for presentation.

Start preparing for presentation & viva voce and improve your work according to the given

instructions and guidelines. Also read lesson # 7 of this course and DOWNLOAD section at VULMS of your course.

Your concepts regarding your Project work and ratio analysis should be very strong

for delivering an effective presentation.

For any further guidance about your presentation and viva, ask your queries via MDB or email at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Page 3 of 53

Final Project

Liquidity & Leverage Ratio Analyses of Lucky Cement Limited, D.G. Khan Cement Company

Limited and Kohat Cement Company Limited in Cement Sector for

FY 2009-2011

A REPORT

SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES,

VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY OF PAKISTAN

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Submitted By

mc100206352

Muhammad Sohail Ahmad

Page 4 of 53

Department of Management Sciences,

Virtual University of Pakistan

Page 5 of 53

Page 6 of 53

Dedication

I dedicate my work to my father and my late mother who supported me morally,

financially and brought me to the path of gaining the knowledge. Then, I dedicate to my

wife who suffered a lot during my MBA study but always motivated me.

Page 7 of 53

Acknowledgement

I acknowledge my work on this project to Mr. Asad Ahmad Khan, The Director Finance

& Accounts of Lahore Medical & Dental College. Mr. Khan guided me generously

during my work. Then, I would like to acknowledge my work to my senior, Mr. Umair

Khalid, The Manager Accounts at Lahore Medical & Dental College who helped me in

this project.

Page 8 of 53

Executive Summary

This project emphasizes comparing three manufacturing companies in Cement Sector of

Pakistan. These companies are Lucky Cement Company, D.G. Khan Cement & Kohat

Cement Company. The period of the study is year 2009 to year 2011. In this study, the

financials of each company for the recent three years have been evaluated and analyses

made for the Liquidity & Leverage position of all three companies. The study is of much

valuable for all the stakeholders of the companies especially the lenders and investors.

The study is done to apply the knowledge of Financial Statement Analysis. However,

only one segment of Analysis i.e. Liquidity & Leverage Ratio Analyses is made. The

position of liquidity and leverage of three big cement manufacturers of Pakistan has been

analyzed.

It is found during the analysis, despite of some problematic areas, the overall liquidity &

leverage position of D.G. Khan Cement Company is sound and comparatively much

better than other two companies. This is a good sign that attracts investors and lenders.

Further, it is found during the analysis, the overall Leverage health of company is sound

but its overall liquidity position is less than satisfactory.

However, the liquidity and leverage position of Kohat Cement Company was found much

poor. The company meets its operational needs with short term financing. Capital of the

company is unnecessarily high leveraged. As, high leveraging requires greater financing

costs. So, it is difficult for the company to keep aside funds as working capital from its

earnings. This is a very critical scenario for shareholders, investors and lenders of the

company. The management should take steps to make better the Liquidity & Leverage

position of the company.

Page 9 of 53

Table of Contents Page No.

1. Chapter 1: Introduction ____________________________________________ 1-12

1.1 Introduction of the Project _______________________________________ 7-10

1.2 Financial Period Under Consideration ______________________________ 11

1.3 Objectives______________________________________________________ 11

1.4 Significance ____________________________________________________ 12

2. Chapter 2: Data Processing & Analysis ________________________________ 13

2.1 Sources of Data Collection 13

2.2 Data Processing & Analysis 13

3. Chapter 3: Data Analysis __________________________________________ 14-46

Liquidity Ratios

3.1 Current Ratio ________________________________________________ 14-16

3.2 Acid Test Ratio _______________________________________________ 16-19

3.3 Working Capital ______________________________________________ 19-22

3.4 Sales to Working Capital _______________________________________ 22-25

Leverage Ratios 25-25

3.5 Times Interest Earned _________________________________________ 26-28

3.6 Fixed Charge Coverage ________________________________________ 28-31

3.7 Debt Ratio ___________________________________________________ 31-33

3.8 Debt / Equuity Ratio ___________________________________________ 33-35

3.9 Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio _______________________________ 35-38

3.10 Current Worth / Net Worth Ratio ______________________________ 38-41

3.11 Total Capitalizatio Ratio ______________________________________ 41-44

3.12 Long term Assets Vs. Long Term Debt ___________________________ 44-46

4. Chapter 4: Conclusion & Recommendations ____________________________ 47

4.1 Conclusion _____________________________________________________ 47

4.2 Recommendations _______________________________________________ 48

Page 10 of 53

CHAPTER NO. 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 --Introduction of the Project

In the most general sense of the word, cement is a binder, a substance that sets and

hardens independently, and can bind other materials together.

It is the basic and very

much important component of construction material.

Cement industry is indeed a highly important segment of industrial sector that plays a

pivotal role in the socio-economic development of Pakistan. Since cement is a specialized

product, requiring sophisticated infrastructure and production location. Most of the

cement industries in Pakistan are located near/within mountainous regions that are rich in

clay, iron and mineral capacity. Cement industries in Pakistan are currently operating at

their maximum capacity due to the boom in commercial and industrial construction

within Pakistan.

In 1947, Pakistan had inherited four cement plants with a total capacity of 0.5 million

tons. Some expansion took place in 1956–66 but could not keep pace with the economic

development and the country had to resort to imports of cement in 1976-77 and continued

to do so till 1994-95. The cement sector consisting of 27 plants is contributing above Rs

30 billion to the national exchequer in the form of taxes. [2]

“The industry has been earning about $600 million per annum foreign exchange for

Pakistan by exporting 10 million tons of cement per annum for last three years.”[3]

Keeping in view the above statistics, I figured out the importance of cement industry for

economy of Pakistan and selected three giant companies listed with Karachi Stock

Exchange of Pakistan.

Lucky Cement Limited

D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited

Kohat Cement Company Limited

Page 11 of 53

Now, I would present a brief introduction of these companies and their business

activities.

Lucky Cement Limited

Lucky Cement Limited is sponsored by well known “Yunus Brothers Group” – one of the

largest export houses of Pakistan, Lucky Cement Limited currently has the capacity of

producing 25,000 tons per day of dry process Cement.

Lucky Cement came into existence in 1996 with a daily production capacity of 4,200 tons

per day, currently is an omnipotent cement plant of Pakistan, and rated amongst the few

best plants in Asia.

With production facilities in Pezu (Production capacity: 13,000 Tons per day) as well as

in Karachi (Production capacity: 12,000 tons per day), it has the tendency to become the

hub of cement production in Asia.

D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited

D.G. Khan Cement Company Limited (DGKCC), a unit of Nishat group, is the largest

cement-manufacturing unit in Pakistan with a production capacity of 5,500 tons clinker

per day. It has a countrywide distribution network and its products are preferred on

projects of national repute both locally and internationally due to the unparallel and

consistent quality. It is list on all the Stock Exchanges of Pakistan.

DGKCC was established under the management control of State Cement Corporation of

Pakistan Limited (SCCP) in 1978. DGKCC started its commercial production in April

1986 with 2000 tons per day (TPD) clinker based on dry process technology. Plant &

Machinery was supplied by UBE Industries of Japan.

Page 12 of 53

Nishat Group acquired DGKCC in 1992 under the privatization initiative of the

government. Starting from the privatization, the focus of the management has been on

increasing capacity as well as utilization level of the plant.

Kohat Cement Company Limited

Kohat Cement Company Limited (incorporated in 1980) is an ISO 9001-2008 certified

company, listed on Stock Exchanges of Pakistan and engaged in manufacturing of Grey

and White Cements. They say: “Quality of our products is better than approved British

and Pakistan Standards”. The plant is located in Kohat about 60 kilometers from

Peshawar. The annual capacity installed at plant is 2.805 million tons per annum.

In this project, an analytical and comparative study of Liquidity & Leverage ratios of

three listed cement manufacturing companies: Lucky Cement Limited, D.G. Khan

Cement Company Limited and Kohat Cement Company Limited would be done. These

companies are the leading contributors to cement Sector in Pakistan. As well, these

companies are earning the foreign exchange for Pakistan by exporting cement products.

The project is aimed to facilitate the managers, owners, investors, bankers, debtors and

creditors to review the Liquidity & Leverage Position of all three companies. A

comparative analysis of these ratios for FY 2009, 2010, 2011 of these companies would

be made.

Page 13 of 53

1.2 -- Financial Period Under-Consideration for Analysis:

Financial period for ratio analysis is Financial Year 2009 to Financial Year 2011.

1.3 –Objectives

The proposed project is all about to compare the liquidity and leverage ratios of three

selected companies. The objectives of the study are to know:

a. Which of the selected companies is able to pay its short term obligations

effectively?

b. The composition of capital structure of all three companies.

c. Which of the selected companies is able to provide protection of long-term funds

for suppliers?

d. Which of the selected companies is in better position to meet the interest

payments on its debt?

e. Which of the selected companies is able to pay off its long term liabilities on

time?

f. How much of the companies assets are financed through external and internal

debt?

Page 14 of 53

1.3 –Significance

The project is of much interest and valuable for:

a. Investors: As the investors would be able to know which of the three companies

is efficiently managing its working capital solvency. They are concerned to the

liquidity and solvency position of the company to make their investment safe.

b. Creditors: The creditors would be able to know the health of the companies. As

they are always concerned to the liquidity and solvency position of the company.

c. Management: Management needs to know the Liquidity & Leverage ratio

information because management is directly responsible for driving the company

to the route where company can become financially sound and stable.

Page 15 of 53

CHAPTER NO. 2

Data Processing & Analysis

2.1 -- Sources of Data Collection

The data for the project is collected totally from secondary sources. The internet,

websites of the selected companies and annual reports of the companies have been used

in order to collect data.

The financial reports of the companies have been taken from following online websites of

the companies:

1. http://www.lucky-cement.com/financialreports.htm

2. http://www.dgcement.com/financial.html

3. http://www.kohatcement.com/financials.html

2.1 -- Data Processing and Analysis

The collected data has been analyzed and processed according to the format provided in

the project template. Following computing tools have been used for the purpose of

compilation of data and to analyze and transform it into information:

Microsoft Word

Microsoft Excel

Internet

http://www.lucky-cement.com/financialreports.htm

http://www.dgcement.com/financial.html

http://www.kohatcement.com/financials.html

Page 16 of 53

Chapter 3) Data Analysis

LIQUIDITY & LEVERAGE RATIO ANALYSES of Lucky Cement Limited, D.G.

Khan Cement Company Limited and Kohat Cement Company Limited in cement sector

for Financial Year 2009 to 2011:

LIQUIDITY RATIOS:

Liquidity Ratios indicate short term financial position of the company and its ability to

meet the short term financial obligations and liabilities.

Liquidity Ratios include:

Current Ratio

Acid Test Ratio

Working Capital

Sales to working capital

CURRENT RATIO:

Current Ratio indicates that how efficiently an organization can meet its current liabilities

by utilizing its current assets.

FORMULA:

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities

Year 2009 Year 2010 Year 2011

Lucky Cement 7,857,942,000/

9,098,678,000=

0.864 Times

6,871,464,000/

9,641,691,000=

0.713 Times

9,444,466,000/

10,696,789,000=

0.883 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 13,287,592,000/

15,834,799,000=

0.839 Times

16,417,492,000/

13,786,189,000=

1.191 Times

18,295,030,000/

12,657,194,000=

1.445 Times

Kohat Cement 1,645,675,393/

2,946,392,234=

0.559 Times

1,407,168,642/

3,242,472,939=

0.434 Times

1,953,618,476/

2,810,539,470=

0.695 Times

Page 17 of 53

Working:

As, the figures of current assets and current liabilities of all three companies for all three

years is clearly mentioned and categorized in the Annual financial repots of the

companies. So that, I didn’t show the working for the figures of current assets and current

liabilities.

Graphical Presentation of Current Ratios:

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6


Cu

rre

nt

Ra

tio

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

In Current ratio, we compare the volume of current assets to current liabilities in order to

assess the short term liquidity position of the company. For example, the current ratio of

Lucky cement for year 2009 is 0.864 Times. It means in the year 2009 the current assets

of Lucky Cement are 86.4 % of its current liabilities.

Lucky Cement: Trend line in the graph shows that Current ratio of the company for year

2009 was 0.864 times i.e. 86.4%. In year 2010, it falls to 0.713 times due to decrease in

volume of current assets during the year. This decrease was due to (move over)

investment of current assets into capital assets during the year. However, in year 2011 the

Page 18 of 53

ratio again moves to the level of 88.3%. This is the peak point of ratio during the period

2009-2011.The performance of the company is near to satisfactory from the perspective

of short term lenders.

D.G. Khan Cement: Trend line in the graph shows that Current ratio of the company for

year 2009 was 0.839 times i.e. 83.9%. In year 2010, it shows an increasing trend and

moves to 1.191 times mainly because of increase in fair value of investments of Rs. 3.6

billion and a decrease of Rs. 2.05 billion in current liabilities during the year. In year

2011, due to further increase of Rs. 1.39 billion in fair value of investments and decrease

of Rs. 1.13 billions in volume of current liabilities the ratio moves up to 1.445. The

performance of the company is very good from the perspective of short term lenders.

Kohat Cement: The trend in the graph indicates that first in the year 2010 the liquidity

of the company falls 43.4% as compared to 55.9% of year 2009. It is because of

excessive borrowing and decrease in current assets. In the year 2011it moves upward to

69.5% i.e. the liquidity position of the company is improving. However, the performance

of the company is unsatisfactory from the perspective of short term lenders. It is because

of the current assets are much lesser in volume as compared to current liabilities.

The graph shows that the short term liquidity position of D.G. Khan is better of all.

While, keeping Lucky cement in mid position the short term liquidity position of Kohat

Cement Company is lower of all.

ACID TEST RATIO:

Acid Test Ratio is also named Quick Ratio. It measures the “Liquidity of the assets of

company to pay off its short term obligations & liabilities”. When working out quick

ratio, we take current assets exclusive of inventory and prepaid expenses and divide the

outcome by Current Liabilities. As, inventory and prepaid expenses are unable to convert

easily into cash or cash equivalents. So, the Quick ratio states comparatively better

liquidity position of the company.

Page 19 of 53

FORMULA:

Acid Test Ratio = Quick Assets / Current Liabilities



9,098,678,000=

0.357 Times

2,214,776,000/

9,641,691,000=

0.230 Times

1,856,113,000/

10,696,789,000=

0.174 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 9,451,696,000/

15,834,799,000=

0.597 Times

12,362,874,000/

13,786,189,000=

0.897 Times

13,889,855,000/

12,657,194,000=

1.097 Times

Kohat Cement 663,423,796/

2,946,392,234=

0.225 Times

476,402,765/

3,242,472,939=

0.147 Times

594,988,590/

2,810,539,470=

0.212 Times

Working for Quick Assets:

Quick Assets = Current Assets – Inventory – Prepaid Expenses

Year 2009

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2010

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2011

(Amount in Rs.)

Lucky Cement 7,857,942,000-

4,608,157,000-

3,086,000=

3,246,699,000

6,871,464,000-

4,617,101,000-

39,587,000=

2,214,776,000

9,444,466,000-

7,562,122,000-

26,231,000=

1,856,113,000

D.G. Khan Cement 13,287,592,000-

3,835,716,000-

180,000=

9,451,696,000

16,417,492,000-

4,054,618,000-

0=

12,362,874,000

18,295,030,000-

4,405,175,000-

0=

13,889,855,000

Kohat Cement 1,645,675,393-

981,138,005-

1,113,592 =

663,423,796

1,407,168,642-

928,433,484-

2,332,393 =

476,402,765

1,953,618,476-

1,358,098,531-

531,355 =

594,988,590

Note:

(a) Here the figure of Inventory is calculated as under:

Inventory = Stores, Spares & Loose tools + Stock in Trade

Year 2009

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2010

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2011

(Amount in Rs.)

Lucky Cement 3,411,549,000+

1,196,608,000=

4,608,157,000

4,008,288,000+

608,813,000=

4,617,101,000

6,313,584,000+

1,248,538,000=

7,562,122,000

Page 20 of 53

D.G. Khan Cement 2,935,880,000+

899,836,000=

3,835,716,000

3,017,742,000+

1,036,876,000=

4,054,618,000

3,543,034,000+

862,141,000=

4,405,175,000

Kohat Cement 841,844,312+

139,293,693=

981,138,005

638,000,427+

290,433,057=

928,433,484

850,571,198 +

507,527,333=

1,358,098,531

* For the calculation of Inventory; Stores & Spares is also included along with stock in

trade because it is also difficult to liquidate easily.

(b) Prepaid Expenses are also called prepayments. The figure of prepayments is taken

from Notes to the Financial Statements available in the Annual Financial Reports of all

three companies (related to Sub group of Current Asset group “Advances, Deposits,

Prepayments & Other Receivables”).

Graphical Presentation:

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2


Qu

ick

Ra

tio

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

In Acid test ratio we compare the volume of quick assets (cash & cash equivalents,

marketable securities & accounts receivable) with the volume of current liabilities in

order to assess if the company has availability of sufficient quick assets to meet the short

term obligations. As, quick ratio of D.G. Khan Cement for year 2011 is 1.097 times

Page 21 of 53

means D.G. Khan cement has quick assets 1.097 times as compared to current liabilities

1.0 times.

Lucky Cement: The quick ratio of company shows a continuously declining trend. In the

year 2010 it falls from 0.357 times to 0.230 times. In the year 2011 it further falls to

0.174 times. The reason for this downfall is continuous increase in excessive stocks and

gradual increase in current liabilities during the analysis period. This is a very crucial

position and bad indicator for company from perspective of short term liquidity.

D.G. Khan Cement: The quick ratio of company shows a continuously improving trend.

In the year 2010 it rises to 0.897 times as compared to ratio of year 2009 0.597 times. In

the year 2011 it further rises to 1.097 times. The reason for continuous improvement is

gradual decrease in current liabilities and increase in current assets due to increase in fair

value of investments over the period under analysis.

Kohat Cement: The quick ratio of the company first shows a declining trend in year

2010 as it declines to 0.147 times as compared to 0.225 times of year 2009. And in the

year 2011 it shows an improving trend i.e. improves to 0.212 times. The reason for

decline in year 2010 was excessive short term borrowings and decrease in quick assets.

Results indicate a very poor liquidity position of the company from perspective of short

term lenders.

The graph shows that short term liquidity position of D.G. Khan Cement is better of all.

While, the Liquidity position of Lucky cement was better than that of Kohat Cement in

years 2009 and 2010. But, in year 2011 the liquidity position of Lucky cement is lower

than that of Kohat Cement.

WORKING CAPITAL:

Working Capital is the amount of current assets which is in excess to current liabilities. It

is figured out by subtracting the amount of current liabilities from current assets. The

working capital of the company should neither be too high nor be too low. The greater

Page 22 of 53

amount of working capital shows more liquidity but the opportunity for profit from

investment is lost. The negative amount of working capital shows the illiquid position of

the company which, if uncontrolled, may tend towards insolvency. Hence, there should

be a balance position of current assets and current liabilities.

FORMULA:

Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities

Year 2009

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2010

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2011

(Amount in Rs.)

Lucky Cement 7,857,942,000-

9,098,678,000=

Rs -1,240,736,000

6,871,464,000-

9,641,691,000=

Rs. -2,770,227,000

9,444,466,000-

10,696,789,000=

Rs. -1,252,323,000

D.G. Khan Cement 13,287,592,000-

15,834,799,000=

Rs. -2,547,207,000

16,417,492,000-

13,786,189,000=

Rs. 2,631,303,000

18,295,030,000-

12,657,194,000=

Rs. 5,637,836,000


2,946,392,234=

Rs. -1,300,716,841

1,407,168,642-

3,242,472,939=

Rs. -1,835,304,297

1,953,618,476-

2,810,539,470=

Rs. -856,920,994


-4,000,000,000

-3,000,000,000

-2,000,000,000

-1,000,000,000

0

1,000,000,000

2,000,000,000

3,000,000,000

4,000,000,000

5,000,000,000

6,000,000,000

7,000,000,000


Wo

rkin

g C

ap

ita

l "R

up

ee

s"

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Page 23 of 53

Interpretation:

Working Capital is a measure of company’s efficiency and its short term financial health.

We derive its figure by subtracting the amount of current assets from current liabilities. A

positive amount of working capital shows that a company can pay off its current

liabilities out of its current assets. A negative amount of working capital shows that

company is unable to pay off its short term liabilities out of its current assets.

Lucky Cement: The trend shows that in year 2009 working capital of the company was

negative (1.241) billion Rupees. In year 2010, it further declines and reaches to negative

(2.770) billion Rupees. In year 2011, the trend shows an upward movement and reaches

to a negative (1.252) billion Rupees. The reason for downfall in year 2010 was a decrease

of 987 millions Rupees in current assets as compared to year 2009. The reason for a

continuous deficit working capital is the company is heavily financed with running

finances and short term borrowings. Short term financial health of the company remains

poor from the perspective of short term lenders.

D.G. Khan Cement: The trend shows that in year 2009 working capital of the company

was negative (2.547) billion Rupees. In year 2010, it improves and reaches to 2.631

billion Rupees. In year 2011, it improves further and reaches to 5.638 billions. The reason

for continuous improvement is gradual decrease in current liabilities and increase in

current assets due to increase in fair value of investments over the period under analysis.

Short term financial health of company remains very good in year 2010 & year 2011.

Kohat Cement: Working capital of the company shows first a declining and then an

improving trend. In year 2009, it was a negative (1.3) billion Rupees. In year 2010, it

declines to a negative (1.86) billion Rupees. But, in year 2011, it improves and becomes a

negative (857) million Rupees. The reason for decrease in 2010 was due to a decrease of

239 million Rupees in current assets and an increase of 296 million Rupees in trade

payables and short term borrowings as compared to year 2009. The reason for continuous

deficit in working capital is the same as in the case of Lucky Cement.

Page 24 of 53

Comparatively, the short term financial health of D.G. Khan Cement is better of all and is

improving over the years. While, the financial health of Lucky Cement and Kohat

Cement remains poor during the analysis period.

SALES TO WORKING CAPITAL:

Sales to Working capital Ratio is used to measure the contribution of working capital for

revenue generating. Companies have to pay the cost of using the working capital. So, this

ratio shows if the revenue earned using the working capital is enough to cover the

financing cost associated with working capital or not.

FORMULA:

Sales to Working Capital Ratio = Net Sales / Working Capital


Lucky Cement 26,330,404,000/

-1,240,736,000=

-21.222 Times

24,508,793,000/

-2,770,227,000=

-8.847 Times

26,017,519,000/

-1,252,323,000=

-20.775 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 18,038,209,000/

-2,547,207,000=

-7.082 Times

16,275,354,000/

2,631,303,000=

6.185 Times

18,577,198,000/

5,637,836,000=

3.295 Times


-1,300,716,841=

-2.611 Times

3,692,038,418/

-1,835,304,297=

-2.012 Times

6,085,434,517/

-856,920,994=

-7.102 Times

Working:

* The figure of “Net Sales” is clearly mentioned in P&L Accounts of all companies

related to the study period 2009 to 2011.

* The figure of “Working Capital” is calculated as under:

Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities

Year 2009

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2010

(Amount in Rs.)

Year 2011

(Amount in Rs.)

Lucky Cement 7,857,942,000- 6,871,464,000- 9,444,466,000-

Page 25 of 53

9,098,678,000=

Rs -1,240,736,000

9,641,691,000=

Rs. -2,770,227,000

10,696,789,000=

Rs. -1,252,323,000

D.G. Khan Cement 13,287,592,000-

15,834,799,000=

Rs. -2,547,207,000

16,417,492,000-

13,786,189,000=

Rs. 2,631,303,000

18,295,030,000-

12,657,194,000=

Rs. 5,637,836,000


2,946,392,234=

Rs. -1,300,716,841

1,407,168,642-

3,242,472,939=

Rs. -1,835,304,297

1,953,618,476-

2,810,539,470=

Rs. -856,920,994


-25.00

-20.00

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00


Sa

les

to

Wo

rkin

g C

ap

ita

l R

ati

o

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

Working Capital turnover ratio measures the use of working capital for generation of

sales over the period of analysis. It shows the information regarding how effectively the

company is using its working capital to generate the sales. A positive ratio shows that

company has surplus working capital to finance its operations. A negative ratio shows

that company has deficit working capital i.e. financed with short term finances to meet its

operations and to generate the sales.

Page 26 of 53

Lucky Cement: Trend states that company doesn’t have enough working capital to meet

the operations and to generate the sales over the analysis period. Further, the negative

sign with the ratios shows that company doesn’t have sufficient current assets and

acquires running finances and short term loans to meet its operational needs. In the year

2009 ratio was -21.22 times states that company utilized short term loan of 1 Rupee to

generate the sales of every 21.22 Rupees. In year 2010, it declines to -8.847 times. But, in

year 2011 it again rises to -20.755.

In year 2010, the ratio result is very critical as company utilizes short term finances of

2.77 billion Rupees to generate the sales of 24.508 billion Rupees i.e. short term finance

of 1 Rupee is being used to generate the sales of every 8.847 Rupees only. The figure of

Net Sales in the year 2010 remains almost the same but the working capital deficit

reaches to double as compared to year 2009 & year 2011.

Results of the ratio states that short term financial health of company is poor as it depends

heavily on short term loans to meet its working capital / operational needs.

D.G. Khan Cement: Ratio’s trend of company states that in the year 2010 it increases to

6.185 as compared to -7.082 of year 2009. But, in year 2011 it declines to 3.295.

In year 2009 company uses short term finance of Rupee 1 to generate every sale of

Rupees 7.082 because of deficit in working capital. In year 2010, company has sufficient

working capital i.e. Rupee 1 is available to use in operations for generating revenue of

every 6.185 Rupees. In year 2011, company invests Rupee 1 of working capital to

generate every sale of Rupees 3.295. Trend shows that over all short term financial health

of company is very good as it efficiently uses its working capital for operational needs to

generate revenue.

Kohat Cement: Trend states that company doesn’t have enough working capital to meet

the operations and to generate the sales over the analysis period. In the year 2009 ratio

was -2.611 times states that company utilized short term loan of 1 Rupee to generate the

sales of every 2.611 Rupees. In year 2010, it declines to -2.012 times means company

utilized trade finance of Rupee 1 to generate the sale of every 2.012 Rupees. But, in year

2011 it again rises to -7.102 shows that company generates sales of Rupees 7.102 by

Page 27 of 53

utilizing a single rupee of working capital. In year 2011, the ratio improves to more than

double as compared to previous 2 years result because company generated heavy sales by

utilizing lesser amount of running finance. Results of the ratio states that short term

financial health of company is poor as it depends heavily on short term loans to meet its

working capital / operational needs.

As compared to D.G. Khan Cement & Kohat Cement, Lucky cement utilized the working

capital / running finance more efficiently to generate the bigger volume of sales. On the

other hand, Kohat Cement utilized its working capital / running finance inefficiently as

compared to other companies lesser volume of sales were generated using working

capital.

LEVERAGE RATIOS:

Leverage Ratios:

In terms of financing, Leverage means the relationship between the amount of money that

a company owes and the value of its shares in equity. Mainly, leverage ratios are used to

analyze the relationship between two components of capital: Equity & Debt. These ratios

measure the leverage position and long run solvency of the company. The Capital of the

company should be composed of both equity & debt in a balanced order. It should neither

be highly leveraged nor highly unleveraged.

Leverage Ratios include:

Times Interest Earned

Fixed Charge Coverage

Debt Ratio

Debt / Equity Ratio

Debt to Tangible Net worth Ratio

Current Worth / Net Worth Ratio

Total Capitalization Ratio

Long term Assets versus Long term Debt

Page 28 of 53

TIMES INTEREST EARNED:

Times Interest Earned ratio is also called Interest Coverage Ratio. It is used to measure

the ability of company to meet its debt obligations. It indicates how many times a

company can cover interest charges on its debt from its Earning before Interest & Taxes

(EBIT). It is calculated by Dividing the Pre Interest and Pre taxes profits with Interest

charges.

FORMULA:

Times Interest Earned = Earning before Interest & Taxes / Interest Charges


Lucky Cement *6,413,972,000/

1,236,971,000=

5.185 Times

*3,986,698,000/

569,184,000=

7.004 Times

*4,838,309,000/

517,788,000=

9.344 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 3,383,258,000/

2,606,358,000=

1.298 Times

2,261,163,000/

1,902,760,000=

1.188 Times

2,652,870,000/

2,051,678,000=

1.293 Times

Kohat Cement 693,901,047/

549,902,638=

1.262 Times

276,352,096/

658,589,707=

0.420 Times

841,027,713/

715,246,906=

1.176 Times

*In Profit/(Loss) Statement of “Lucky Cement”, a clear figure of EBIT is not shown. So,

the EBIT amount is calculated using the reverse order, as shown,

Working:

Calculation of EBIT of Lucky Cement

Year 2009 Profit Before Taxation + Finance Cost

=5,177,001,000 + 1,236,971,000

=Rs. 6,413,972,000


=3,417,514,000 +569,184,000

=Rs. 3,986,698,000


=4,320,521,000+517,788,000

=Rs. 4,838,309,000

Page 29 of 53


0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00


Tim

es

In

tere

st

Ea

rne

d

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

In this ratio the pre interest and pre tax earning (EBIT) of company is compared with

service /Interest charges of Debt. This is done to assess the ability of company to pay off

interest charges out of its earning. A higher ratio indicates that company can easily pay

off the charges of using the debt. However, a higher ratio also states that company has

undesirably low level of leverage. A lower ratio states that company earned lesser income

to meet the interest payments or the company is highly leveraged and has to pay bigger

amount of interest for using the debt. A negative ratio shows the chances for company of

being bankrupt.

Lucky Cement: Trend states that company is improving in terms of Times Interest

Earned. As, in year 2009 the ratio was 5.185. In year 2010, ratio improves to 7.004 as

compared to 5.185 of year 2009. In year 2011, the ratio further improves to 9.344. Trend

shows that company is earning more than sufficient profit (EBIT) to meet the service

charges of debt. However, about result of year 2011, it is found that company is at

undesirably low leverage level and losing the opportunity to invest for better returns. The

ratio of the company is very good from the perspective of lenders and investors.

Page 30 of 53

D.G. Khan Cement: Ratios and trend states that in year 2009 the tie ratio was 1.298

times. In 2010 it falls slightly and reaches to 1.188 and in 2011 it improves again to 1.293

times. In year 2009, the ratio is greater than that of year 2010 & 2011. The reason of

lowest ratio in year 2010 was company earned the lowest volume of EBIT as compared

to year 2009 & year 2011. The times interest earned ratios of company states that

company is earning sufficient to meet service charges of debt. Moreover the debt capacity

of company is satisfactory from perspective of lenders and investors.

Kohat Cement: In year 2009, the times interest earned ratio of company was 1.262. In

2010 it falls badly to 0.420 and in year 2011 it again rises to 1.176 times. Company has

greatest ratio i.e. 1.262 in year 2009 as compared to year 2010 & 2011. In year 2010

company has critically lowest ratio as compared to year 2009 & 2011 because the

company earned insufficient EBIT and was unable to meet the debt service charges out of

pre tax earnings. In year 2009 & 2011 the debt capacity of company is satisfactory but in

year 2010 its debt capacity is unsatisfactory from perspective of lenders and investors.

Comparatively, the debt capacity of Lucky Cement is better of all. D.G. Khan Cement

Company can be categorized on 2nd

position in terms of debt capacity and Kohat Cement

stands on 3rd

position.

FIXED CHARGE COVERAGE:

This ratio is an important leverage ratio. It indicates the ability of company to pay its

Fixed Charge. Fixed Charge is the financial cost of finance lease liabilities, bonds and

fixed term loans acquired. This ratio indicates how many times a company can cover

Fixed Charge out of its Profits.

FORMULA:

Fixed Charge Coverage =(EBIT + Fixed Charge or lease payment (Before Tax)) /(Fixed

Charge or lease payment (Before Tax) + Interest Charges)

Fixed Charge = Markup on Long Term Finance + Finance Charges on Lease Liabilities

Page 31 of 53


Lucky Cement (6,413,972,000+

788,431,000)/

(788,431,000+

1,236,971,000)=

3.556 Times

(3,986,698,000+

21,280,000)/

(21,280,000+

569,184,000)=

6.788 Times

(4,838,309,000+

45,984,000)/(

45,984,000+

517,788,000)=

8.664 Times

D.G. Khan Cement (3,383,258,000+

1,210,340,000)/

(1,210,340,000+

2,606,358,000)=

1.204 Times

(2,261,163,000+

731,659,000)/

(731,659,000+

1,902,760,000)=

1.136 Times

(2,652,870,000+

778,035,000)/

(778,035,000+

2,051,678,000)=

1.212 Times

Kohat Cement (693,901,047+

400,997,535)/

(400,997,535+

549,902,638)=

1.151 Times

(276,352,096+

527,181,492)/

(527,181,492+

658,589,707)=

0.678 Times

(841,027,713+

536,572,374)/

(536,572,374+

715,246,906)=

1.100 Times

Working (Calculation of Fixed Charge):

Fixed Charge = Markup on Long Term Finance + Finance Charges of Lease Liabilities

Lucky Cement

Year 2009 = 788,431,000+0 = Rs.788,431,000

Year 2010 = 21,280,000+0 = Rs.21,280,000

Year 2011 = 45,984,000+0 = Rs.45,984,000

D.G. Khan Cement

Year 2009 = 1,210,330,000+10,000 = Rs.1,210,340,000

Year 2010 =731,659,000+0 = Rs.731,659,000

Year 2011 =778,035,000+0 = Rs.778,035,000

Kohat Cement

Year 2009 =40,021,0783 + 786,752 = Rs.400,997,535

Year 2010 =526,747,221 + 434,271 = Rs.527,181,492

Year 2011 = 536,417,971 + 154,403 = Rs.536,572,374

Page 32 of 53


0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00


Fix

ed

Ch

arg

e C

ov

era

ge

Ra

tio

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

The fixed charge coverage ratio of a company shows that how many times company can

cover fixed charges or lease payments out of its income before fixed charge. The higher

the ratio the better is the debt position of company and vice versa.

Lucky Cement: In year 2009, company was able to meet its fixed charge 3.556 times. It

improves to 6.788 times in year 2010 and further improves to 8.664 times in year 2011.

The trend states that the debt position of the company is improving each year. It is a good

indicator from perspective of lenders and financial institutions.

D.G. Khan Cement: In year 2009, company had 1.204 times capacity to meet its fixed

charge. In year 2010, it reaches to 1.136 times after a slight fall. In year 2011, it again

improves to 1.212 times. Trend states that the debt position of company is satisfactory

from the perspective of providers of long term debt and financial lease.

Kohat Cement: In year 2009, company had 1.151 times capacity to cover its fixed

charge out of Income before fixed charge. The ratio declines to 0.678 times in year 2010

Page 33 of 53

and in year 2011 it improves again to 1.100 times. Trend states that debt position of

company remains satisfactory during year 2009 & year 2011. While in the year 2010 it is

unsatisfactory because company suffered a big decline in its income during the year.

Comparatively, the debt position of Lucky Cement is better of all. D.G. Khan Cement

Company can be categorized on 2nd

position in terms of debt capacity and Kohat Cement

stands on 3rd

position.

DEBT RATIO:

This is an important ratio of Leverage Ratios group. It measures total debt of the

company relative to the assets of the company. The greater debt ratio shows company has

acquired debt more than the equity to finance its assets. The lower Debt Ratio shows

company has equity more than debt to finance the assets. So, this ratio can help potential

investors to know the level of risk associated with the company.

FORMULA:

Debt Ratio = Total Debt / Total Assets

Here, Total Debt = Total Liabilities


Lucky Cement 15,140,390,000/

38,392,362,000=

0.394 Times

13,214,315,000 /

38,310,244,000=

0.345 Times

13,437,026,000/

41,209,855,000 =

0.326 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 21,804,599,000/

42,723,041,000=

0.510 Times

20,526,823,000/

47,046,043,000=

0.436 Times

19,455,765,000/

49,673,050,000=

0.392 Times

Kohat Cement 6,353,347,077 /

8,624,894,242 =

0.737 Times

6,712,409,935 /

8,673,379,806 =

0.774 Times

7,021,584,704 /

9,124,400,841 =

0.770 Times

Page 34 of 53


0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90


De

bt

Ra

tio

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

Debt Ratio compares total debt of the company with its total assets in order to assess

whether the assets are financed through equity or debt. A lower Debt ratio shows the

major part of assets is financed through equity. A greater debt ratio states the assets are

financed more by debt.

Lucky Cement: The ratio of the company was 0.394 in year 2009. In year 2010, it falls

to 0.345 times and again in year 2011 it falls to 0.326 times. Trend states that the

company is gradually decreasing its debt as compared to equity and increasing the use of

equity for financing the assets. We find that company has much potential for leverage and

this position is very good from perspective of lenders and investors.

D.G. Khan Cement: The debt ratio of the company was 0.510 times in 2009. In 2010, it

falls to 0.436 times and in year 2011 it again falls and reaches to 0.392 times. Trend

states that the company is gradually decreasing its debt as compared to equity and

increasing the use of equity for financing the assets. We find that company has much

Page 35 of 53

potential for leverage and this position is very good from perspective of lenders and

investors.

Kohat Cement: The debt ratio of company was 0.737 in year 2009. It increases to 0.774

times in year 2010 and declines to 0.770 in year 2011 after a slight fall. Trend states that

the company depends more on debt for financing the assets. It shows that company is

highly leveraged and it has less or no more potential for taking the debt. The company’s

situation is not attractive from perspective of lenders and investors.

Comparatively, the debt position of Lucky Cement is healthier of all in terms of Long run

solvency position as a very low level of risk is associated from perspective of investors

and lenders. On the other hand, Kohat Cement is highly leveraged. The current position

of Kohat Cement is not a good sign for potential investors because a higher level of risk

is associated with the company from investors’ perspective.

DEBT / EQUITY RATIO:

Debt / Equity Ratio measure the leverage position of the company. It indicates how much

proportion of the capital of company is financed with equity and how much is debt

financed. It is calculated by dividing the Total Liabilities by Total Equity.

FORMULA:

Debt / Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity

Here, Total Debt = Total Liabilities


Lucky Cement 15,140,390,000/

23,251,972,000 =

0.651 Times

13,214,315,000 /

25,095,929,000=

0.527 Times

13,437,026,000/

27,772,829,000=

0.484 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 21,804,599,000/

20,918,442,000=

1.042 Times

20,526,823,000/

26,519,220,000=

0.774 Times

19,455,765,000/

30,217,285,000=

0.644 Times


2,271,547,165=

2.797 Times

6,712,409,935/

1,960,969,871=

3.423 Times

7,021,584,704/

2,102,816,137=

3.339 Times

Page 36 of 53


0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00


De

bt/

Eq

uit

y R

ati

o

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

The total capital of a company consists of two parts. They are debt and equity. In this

ratio we compare the contribution of debt and equity to the capital of company. The

greater ratio shows that company is financed heavily from borrowing and the lower ratio

shows that major volume of company’s capital is composed of equity.

Lucky Cement: The ratio of the company was 0.651 in year 2009. It declines to 0.527

times in 2010 and again a declining trend reaches it to 0.484 times. Trend shows that in

major contribution to the capital of company comes from equity sources. The company

has much potential for leverage. This is a good indicator for investors and financial

institutions.

D.G. Khan Cement: The ratio of company was 1.042 in year 2009. In 2010 it falls to

0.774 times and in 2011 again declines to 0.644 times. Trend states that long term

solvency of the company improve over the period. In year 2009, the capital of the

company was majorly contributed by debt. However, in year 2010 & 2011, the major

contribution of capital is equity. As compared to standard of 1.5:1 the company has a

Page 37 of 53

great potential for leverage and long term financial health of company attractive for

investors and lenders.

Kohat Cement: The ratio of company was 2.797 in year 2009. In 2010 it increase to

3.423 times and in year 2011 it reaches to 3.339 after a slight fall compared to previous

year. The trend of ratios indicates that company is highly leveraged and about 75% of

capital is contributed by debt. This is a very critical situation because the company would

have to pay a major part of its earnings to meet the interest charges of debt. The company

is unable to attract more investors and lenders due to this bad position of solvency.

Trend shows, during the analysis period, the solvency position of Lucky Cement remains

better of all and it has ability to induct more debt for its long run financing needs. The

solvency position of D.G. Cement is also good and it has more potential for leverage. The

solvency position of Kohat Cement is poor of all. If uncontrolled, company may have to

suffer the situation of bankruptcy and break down of business process.

DEBT TO TANGIBLE NET WORTH RATIO:

It is a measure of physical worth of company. In a debt to tangible net worth ratio the

value of intangible assets like patent and copyrights are excluded from Net Worth of

company. Then debt is compared with Tangible Net Worth. It is more comprehensive

measure of solvency than Debt/Equity Ratio.

FORMULA:

Debt to Tangible Net worth Ratio = Total Debt / Tangible Net Worth

Tangible Net Worth = Total Assets – Total Liabilities – Intangible Assets


Lucky Cement 15,140,390,000/

23,251,972,000 =

0.651 Times

13,214,315,000/

25,092,952,000=

0.527 Times

13,437,026,000/

27,771,144,000=

0.484 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 21,804,599,000/

20,918,442,000=

1.042 Times

20,526,823,000/

26,519,220,000=

0.774 Times

19,455,765,000/

30,217,285,000=

0.644 Times


2,268,857,253=

2.800 Times

6,712,409,935/

1,958,382,218=

3.428 Times

7,021,584,704/

2,100,460,174=

3.343 Times

Page 38 of 53

Working (Calculation of Tangible Net Worth):

Tangible Net Worth = Total Assets – Total Liabilities – Intangible Assets

Lucky Cement

Year 2009 =38,392,362,000-15,140,390,000-0

=Rs.23,251,972,000

Year 2010 =38,310,244,000-13,214,315,000-2,977,000

=Rs.25,092,952,000

Year 2011 =41,209,855,000-13,437,026,000-1,685,000

=Rs.27,771,144,000

D.G. Khan Cement

Year 2009 =42,723,041,000 -21,804,599,000 -0

=Rs.20,918,442,000

Year 2010 =47,046,043,000- 20,526,823,000-0

=Rs.26,519,220,000

Year 2011 =49,673,050,000 -19,455,765,000 -0

=Rs.30,217,285,000

Kohat Cement

Year 2009 =8,624,894,242 -6,353,347,077 - 2,689,912

=Rs.2,268,857,253

Year 2010 =8,673,379,806 -6,712,409,935-2,587,653

=Rs.1,958,382,218

Year 2011 =9,124,400,841 -7,021,584,704-2,355,963

=Rs.2,100,460,174

Page 39 of 53


0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00


De

bt

to T

an

gib

le N

et

wo

rth

Ra

tio

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

The Debt to Tangible Net Worth ratio shows a more precise picture of debt & equity

proportion of capital as compared to Debt/Equity Ratio. As, it is difficult to realize and to

value the Intangible Assets. So, in order to get a fairer picture of capital composition,

value of Intangible Assets is excluded from value of capital.

Lucky Cement: The ratio of the company was 0.651 in year 2009. It declines to 0.527

times in 2010 and again a declining trend reaches it to 0.484 times. Trend shows that

major contribution to the capital of company comes from equity sources. The company

has much potential for leverage. This is a good indicator for investors and financial

institutions.

D.G. Khan Cement: The ratio of company was 1.042 in year 2009. In 2010 it falls to

0.774 times and in 2011 again declines to 0.644 times. Trend states that long term

solvency of the company improve over the period. In year 2009, the capital of the

company was majorly contributed by debt. However, in year 2010 & 2011, the major

contribution of capital is equity. As compared to standard of 1.5:1 the company has a

Page 40 of 53

great potential for leverage and long term financial health of company attractive for

investors and lenders.

Kohat Cement: The ratio of company was 2.800 in year 2009. In 2010 it increase to

3.428 times and in year 2011 it reaches to 3.343 after a slight fall compared to previous

year. The trend of ratios indicates that company is highly leveraged and more than 75%

of capital is contributed by debt. This is a very critical situation because the company

would have to pay a major part of its earnings to meet the interest charges of debt. The

company is unable to attract more investors and lenders due to this bad position of

solvency.

Trend shows, during the analysis period, the solvency position of Lucky Cement remains

better of all and it has ability to induct more debt for its long run financing needs. The

solvency position of D.G. Cement is also good and it has more potential for leverage. The

solvency position of Kohat Cement is poor of all. If uncontrolled the situation, Kohat

Cement Company may have to suffer the situation of insolvency / bankruptcy.

CURRENT WORTH / NET WORTH RATIO:

The Current Worth is the amount of current Assets that is left excess if all the current

liabilities are paid off. The Net Worth is the Balance amount of Total Assets left after

paying all the Liabilities. This ratio used to compute the proportion of Current Worth and

Net Worth.

FORMULA:

Current Worth / Net worth Ratio = Current Worth / Net Worth

Current Worth = Total Current Assets – Total Current Liabilities

Net Worth = Total Assets – Total Liabilities


Lucky Cement -1,240,736,000/

23,251,972,000=

-0.053?

-2,770,227,000/

25,095,929,000=

-0.110?

-1,252,323,000/

27,772,829,000=

-0.045?

D.G. Khan Cement -2,547,207,000/

20,918,442,000=

-0.122?

2,631,303,000/

26,519,220,000=

0.099?

5,637,836,000/

30,217,285,000=

0.187?

Page 41 of 53

Kohat Cement -1,300,716,841/

2,271,547,165=

-0.573?

-1,835,304,297/

1,960,969,871=

-0.936?

-856,920,994/

2,102,816,137=

-0.408?

Working (Calculation of Current & Net Worth):

(A) Current Worth = Total Current Assets – Total Current Liabilities

Lucky Cement

Year 2009 = 7,857,942,000-9,098,678,000

= Rs.-1,240,736,000

Year 2010 = 6,871,464,000-9,641,691,000

= Rs.-2,770,227,000

Year 2011 = 9,444,466,000-10,696,789,000

= Rs.-1,252,323,000

D.G. Khan Cement

Year 2009 = 13,287,592,000-15,834,799,000

= Rs.-2,547,207,000

Year 2010 = 16,417,492,000-13,786,189,000

= Rs.2,631,303,000

Year 2011 = 18,295,030,000-12,657,194,000

= Rs.5,637,836,000

Kohat Cement

Year 2009 = 1,645,675,393-2,946,392,234

= Rs.-1,300,716,841

Year 2010 = 1,407,168,642-3,242,472,939

= Rs.-1,835,304,297

Year 2011 = 1,953,618,476-2,810,539,470

= Rs.-856,920,994

(B) Net Worth = Total Assets – Total Liabilities

Lucky Cement

Year 2009 = 38,392,362,000-15,140,390,000

= Rs.23,251,972,000

Year 2010 = 38,310,244,000-13,214,315,000

= Rs.25,095,929,000

Year 2011 = 41,209,855,000-13,437,026,000

= Rs.27,772,829,000

Page 42 of 53

D.G. Khan Cement

Year 2009 = 42,723,041,000-21,804,599,000

= Rs.20,918,442,000

Year 2010 = 47,046,043,000-20,526,823,000

= Rs.26,519,220,000

Year 2011 = 49,673,050,000-19,455,765,000

= Rs.30,217,285,000

Kohat Cement

Year 2009 = 8,624,894,242-6,353,347,077

= Rs.2,271,547,165

Year 2010 = 8,673,379,806-6,712,409,935

= Rs.1,960,969,871

Year 2011 = 9,124,400,841-7,021,584,704

= Rs.2,102,816,137


-1.00

-0.80

-0.60

-0.40

-0.20

0.00

0.20

0.40


Cu

rre

nt

Wo

rth

/Ne

t W

ort

h R

ati

o

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation:

In this ratio working capital of the company is compared with its permanent capital

(equity). The purpose of this analysis is to indicate the percentage of net worth that is

invested in company to meet its operational / working needs.

Page 43 of 53

Lucky Cement: The ratio in year 2009 was -0.053 times. In year 2010, it reaches to

-0.110 & in year 2011 it reaches to -0.045. The negative sign with the ratios shows that

company has to acquire running finance to meet its short term financing needs. Further,

the equity portion of the company is not being used efficiently to meet the operational

needs.

D.G. Khan Cement: The ratio in year 2009 was -0.122 times. In year 2010, it improves

to 0.099 & in year 2011 it again improves to 0.187. The negative sign with the ratio in

year 2009 shows that company used short term loan to meet its working capital

requirements. The increasing trend in year 2010 & 2011 shows that the net assets of

company are being employed and used efficiently to meet of working capital

requirements.

Kohat Cement: The ratio in year 2009 was -0.573 times. In year 2010, it falls and

reaches to -0.936 & in year 2011 it reaches to -0.408. The negative sign with the ratios

shows that company has to acquire running finance to meet its short term financing

needs. Further, the equity portion of the company is not being used efficiently or is

unavailable to meet the operational (working capital) needs.

Comparatively, current worth/net worth position of D.G. Khan Cement is better of all.

TOTAL CAPITALIZATION RATIO:

Total Capitalization Ratio measures the debt part of Capital of the company i.e. It shows

how much proportion of permanent capital is financed by long term debt. A company is

considered financially fit if its capital structure shows a low level of debt and a high level

of equity. So, this ratio can help investors to find an opportunity to invest in a financially

sound company.

FORMULA:

Total Capitalization Ratio = Long Term Debt / (Long Term Debt + Total Equity)

Here, Long Term Debt = Long Term Liabilities

Page 44 of 53



(6,041,712,000+

23,251,972,000)=

0.206 Times

3,572,624,000/

(3,572,624,000+

25,095,929,000)=

0.125 Times

2,740,237,000/

(2,740,237,000+

27,772,829,000)=

0.090 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 5,969,800,000/

(5,969,800,000+

20,918,442,000 )=

0.222 Times

6,740,634,000/

(6,740,634,000+

26,519,220,000 )=

0.203 Times

6,798,571,000/

(6,798,571,000+

30,217,285,000 )=

0.184 Times


(3,406,954,843+

2,271,547,165)=

0.600 Times

3,469,936,996/

(3,469,936,996+

1,960,969,871)=

0.639 Times

4,211,045,234/

(4,211,045,234+

2,102,816,137)=

0.667 Times

Working:

I picked the figures of long term debt & total equity from annual financial statements of

companies for the period under consideration. So that, I didn’t show calculations of long

term debt & total equity.


0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80


To

tal C

ap

ita

liza

tio

n R

ati

o

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Page 45 of 53

Interpretation:

In Total capitalization ratio the long term debt is compared with permanent capital of

company. The analysis is done in order to assess what proportion of permanent capital is

financed by long term debt.

Lucky Cement: The total capitalization ratio of company was 0.206 in year 2009. In

2010 it decrease to 0.125 times and reaches to lowest in year 2011 i.e. 0.090 times. It

means in year 2009 the proportion of long term debt to make permanent capital was only

20.6%. In year 2010 it was only 12.5% and in year 2011 it was only 9% of permanent

capital. The decreasing trend of ratios of company is a good indicator that shows the

financial strength of company is increasing over the years. Moreover, the company has a

greater potential for leverage. The position of the company is attractive for investors from

angle of Total Capitalization Ratio.

D.G. Khan Cement: The ratios trend shows that in year 2010 the ratio of the company

declines slightly and reaches to 0.203 times as compared to 0.222 times in year 2009. In

2011, it again declines to 0.184 times. It means in year 2009 the proportion of long term

debt to make permanent capital was only 22.2%. In year 2010 it was only 20.3% and in

year 2011 it was only 18.4% of permanent capital. The decreasing trend of ratios of

company is a good indicator that shows the financial strength of company is increasing

over the years. Moreover, the company has a greater potential for leverage. The position

of the company is attractive for investors from angle of Total Capitalization Ratio.

Kohat Cement: The ratios trend shows that in year 2010 the ratio of the company

increases slightly and reaches to 0.639 times as compared to 0.600 times in year 2009. In

2011, it again increases to 0.667 times. It means in year 2009 the proportion of long term

debt to make permanent capital was 60%. In year 2010 it was 63.9% and in year 2011 it

was 66.7% of permanent capital. The increasing trend of ratios of company is a bad

indicator that shows the financial strength of company is decreasing over the years.

Moreover, the company is undesirably high leveraged. The position of the company is

unsatisfactory for investors from angle of Total Capitalization Ratio.

Page 46 of 53

After comparison, we find that Lucky Cement is more fit financially than other two

companies. In terms of financial health and fitness the D.G. Khan cement stands on

second rank and Kohat cement stands on third position. However, the financial health of

Kohat Cement is weakest due to undesirably high leverage.

LONG TERM ASSETS VERSUS LONG TERM DEBT:

This ratio indicates how much of a company’s long term assets is financed from long

term debt. It is computed by dividing the Long Term Assets by Long Term Debt. It is an

indicator of long term solvency of the company.

FORMULA:

Long Term Assets versus Long Term Debt = Long Term Assets / Long Term Debt


Lucky Cement 30,534,420,000/

6,041,712,000=

5.054 Times

31,438,780,000/

3,572,624,000=

8.800 Times

31,765,389,000/

2,740,237,000=

11.592 Times

D.G. Khan Cement 29,435,449,000/

5,969,800,000 =

4.931 Times

30,628,551,000/

6,740,634,000=

4.544 Times

31,378,020,000/

6,798,571,000=

4.615 Times


3,406,954,843=

2.049 Times

7,266,211,164/

3,469,936,996 =

2.094 Times

7,170,782,365/

4,211,045,234=

1.703 Times

Working:

I picked the figures of long term Assets & long term Debt from annual financial

statements of companies for the period under consideration. So that, I didn’t show

calculations of long term Assets & long term Debt.

Page 47 of 53


0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00


Lo

ng

Te

rm A

ss

ets

vs

. L

on

g T

erm

De

bt

Lucky Cement

D.G. Khan Cement

Kohat Cement

Interpretation :

In this ratio long term assets are compared with long term debt in order to assess how

much of long-term assets is financed from long term debt.

Lucky Cement: The ratio improves to 8.800 times in year 2010 as compared to 5.054

times in year 2009. In 2011 it further improves to 11.592 times. It means that in year

2009 only 19.79% of long term assets of company is being financed with long term debt.

In year 2010 only 11.36% of long term assets of company is being financed with long

term debt. And in year 2011 only 8.63% of long term assets of company is being financed

with long term debt. It shows that long term solvency of company is very good.

D.G. Khan Cement: The ratio declines to 4.544 times in year 2010 as compared to 4.931

times in year 2009. In 2011 it improves to 4.615 times after a slight increase. It means

that in year 2009 only 20.28% of long term assets of company is being financed with

long term debt. In year 2010 only 22.01% of long term assets of company is being

financed with long term debt. And in year 2011 only 21.67% of long term assets of

company is being financed with long term debt. It shows that long term solvency of

company is very good.

Page 48 of 53

Kohat Cement: The ratio improves to 2.094 times in year 2010 as compared to 2.049

times in year 2009 after a very small increase. In 2011 it declines to 1.703 times. It means

that in year 2009 48.82% of long term assets of company is being financed with long

term debt. In year 2010 47.75% of long term assets of company is being financed with

long term debt. And in year 2011 58.73% of long term assets of company is being

financed with long term debt. It shows that long term solvency of company is critically

low.

Comparatively, the long term solvency position of Lucky Cement is better of all. The

D.G. Khan Cement stands second with a very good solvency position. But, the Kohat

Cement stands third with a weakest long term solvency.

Page 49 of 53

Chapter No. 4

Conclusion & Recommendations

4.1 Conclusion:

D.G. Khan Cement Ltd.

The overview of analysis states the general outlook of D.G. Khan Cement Company is

very good. Its liquidity & solvency health are very good. However, a few observations

have been made are listed as follows:

The long term financing of the company have been gradually decreased by the

management since year 2009. It shows a good impact on capital structure of company. In

year 2010, the long term financing of the company reduced by 19.5% as compared with

year 2009. It further decreases by 16.80% in year 2011 compared to year 2010. Trend

shows that long term solvency position of company is being improved. This solvency

position could be beneficial for company in terms of saving the costs of debt financing.

But, the company is also bearing the opportunity loss i.e. the company was able to get

leveraged and gain its advantage like; fixed payments of interest, unshared profits, fixed

term of loan and interest charge paid is tax deductible.

The trend of working capital ratios shows a continuous improvement during the period.

But, in fact it has been declining since year 2009. This trend of improving liquidity is

result of financial redressing. As, the fair market value of investments have been

increased by 1.7 billion Rupees in year 2010. Again, it has been increased by Rs. 3 billion

Rupees in year 2010. If the investments would have been recorded at its actual, the ratios

of the company would have showed a negative trend.

Lucky Cement Company:

During the study, it is found that the Long term solvency health of company is very good

but its short term solvency i.e. Liquidity position is unsatisfactory.

Page 50 of 53

The company is saving the interest charge by utilizing a greater portion of equity for long

term financing needs. Again, like D.G. Khan Cement the company is bearing opportunity

loss by foregoing the attractive benefits of Leverage.

In the over all analysis we find Lucky Cement Company get stand at second position.

Kohat Cement Company:

It is further concluded that the outlook of Kohat Cement Company in terms of Liquidity

and solvency in not satisfactory. The company highly depends on short term and long

term financing. The capital structure of company is undesirably high leveraged.

Resultantly, company bears heavy service charges of debt financing.

4.2 Recommendations:

Lucky Cement Company:

The structure of capital should be made balanced by inducting more debt.

Currently, the proportion of debt in the capital is much lesser as compared to

industry standard of 1.5:1. In this way, company can gain the advantages of

leveraging and can get an opportunity to invest a excessive part of equity in other

business and for better returns.

D.G. Khan Cement Company:

The structure of capital should be made balanced by inducting more debt.

Currently, the proportion of debt in the capital is much lesser as compared to

industry standard of 1.5:1. In this way, company can gain the advantages of

leveraging and can get an opportunity to invest a excessive part of equity in other

business and for better returns.

The liquidity position should be stated at its actual. If the impact of window

dressing for liquidity position are not removed. It would lead to problematic

liquidity position in future.

Page 51 of 53

Kohat Cement Company:

As, the outlook of Kohat Cement Company in terms of Liquidity and solvency in not

satisfactory. The management should induct more equity to make balanced the capital

structure of company. The more dependency on debt should be avoided in order to save

heavy service charges of debt and for saving the working capital from earnings of the

company.

Page 52 of 53

Section II

a) Introduction of the Student

Last Degree Obtained : Bachelor of Commerce

Organization’s Name : Lahore Medical & Dental College

Designation : Senior Accountant

Experience (Years) : 4 Years

b) Appendix / Appendixes

As, the financial statements of all three companies has been downloaded from website

of the companies. The related web links of companies are as under:




c) Bibliography

REFERENCE & SOURCES USED

Handouts on Financial Statements Analysis (FIN621), Virtual University of

Pakistan

Handouts on Research Methods (STA630), Virtual University of Pakistan

Annual Reports of Lucky Cement Limited [On line]

Web URL: http://www.lucky-cement.com/financialreports.htm

Annual Reports of D.G. Cement Limited [On line]

URL: http://www.dgcement.com/financial.html

Annual Reports of Kohat Cement Limited [On line]

URL: http://www.kohatcement.com/financials.html

Financial Ratios [On line]

URL: http://www.invest-2win.com

URL: http://www.spireframe.com/docs/financial_statement_welcome.aspx







http://www.invest-2win.com/

http://www.spireframe.com/docs/financial_statement_welcome.aspx

Page 53 of 53

URL: http://www.universalteacher4u.com/cbse/xii/acctheory/ch11/page2.htm

URL: http://www.wikipedia.com

URL: http://www.investopedia.com

http://www.universalteacher4u.com/cbse/xii/acctheory/ch11/page2.htm

http://www.wikipedia.com/

http://www.investopedia.com/

Documents

Liquidity & Leverage Analysis