11
LMC 30 LPC 1 27-08-09

LMC 30 LPC 1 27-08-09. A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run 090813.21 Heat pulse

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FGC Software Design Review

LMC 30LPC127-08-09

A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA

run 090813.21HeatpulseCalculated temperature along the bus (1.9 K, 2 T, 6000 A)A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting

U=100-150 mV: switch off current during testA. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meetingCorrelationexperiment vs. calculation

Conclusion on Analysis FRESCA test

The simulation code (QP3) is now validated!!! There is a good agreement between experiment and calculations for the voltage signals, the temperatures and the thermal runaway times (for 1.9 K and 4.3 K and currents from 2-12 kA). The quench currents of more than 50 test cases can be simulated with an accuracy better than a few hundred Amps.

To fit the calculations to the experiments, the cooling to helium had to be reduced by about 15% as compared to previous assumptions, possibly due to the presence of film boiling. A separate thermal test by David Richter will be done in coming week.A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 29 Sept 2009, TE-TM meetingRB: case 2 (quench in GHe environment)A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting

Summary table of maximum allowable additional resistance for RB circuit with tau=50 s. Safety margin not includedCase3.5 TeV4 TeV5 TeVLHe (case 1), RRRcable=80, no He cooling554227LHe (case 1), RRRcable=120, no He cooling705533LHe (case 1), RRRcable=80, with He cooling786545LHe (case 1), RRRcable=120, with He cooling1028455GHe (case 2), RRRcable=80, tprop=10 s7562(40)GHe (case 2), RRRcable=80, tprop=20 s10385(60)GHe (case 2), RRRcable=120, tprop=10 s9878(52)GHe (case 2), RRRcable=120, tprop=20 s120110(74)A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meetingtau=100 s7 TeVLHe (case 1), RRRcable=120, with He cooling26For infoConclusion on Safe current calculations: After analysis of the FRESCA 61 mW test and taking RRRbus=100, RRRcable=120, tauRB=50 s, tauRQ=10 s, and assuming a maximum Raddit=90 mW, one can conclude that operating at 3.5 TeV is safe. Operation at 5 TeV seems risky, especially because at this energy a magnet quench could propagate quickly to the interconnect by means of normal zone propagation in the bus. Better estimates of: Thermal propagation through the M1-M3 lines, RRRcable (tests are ongoing in MSC group), Heat flow through the bus (and interconnect) insulation (test planned for this week)are important to further improve the accuracy of the calculations of the safe current. A few more FRESCA tests in a machine-type layout are planned for the coming months and will give additional experimental data for better understanding of the thermal processes. Samples containing low RRRbus (100-150) and Raddit with values between 20 and 50 mW are most important. A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meetingLPC927-08-09

LPC1027-08-09

LPC1127-08-09