1 of 12 REV2

LNGC ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR VENDOR INSPECTION Intertek requirements for inspection and assurance on the LNG Canada project involve more than just inspection.

Intertek are required to provide assurance to the project that the work carried out by the Suppliers and the EPC Contractor (JFJV) is to the project requirements / specifications.

We are committed to make this project “The Safest Project on Earth” and this must be reflected in the approach we take in our surveillance activities.

We through our visits to suppliers must ensure that they will provide equipment that is right first time.

Activities to be carried out every surveillance visit in addition to any Notice of Inspection requirements:

• Verify the all work carried out to the time of inspection has been completed in accordance with Project requirements.

• No ITP shall be signed by Intertek Inspectors. Only ensure ITP has been signed off for all previous • activities by JFJV and supplier. Copies required and / or snap shot for report • Verify MDR status correctly reflects the timeline of fabrication – MDR should always be compiled

progressively. • Major / Critical Inspection points previously carried out were acceptable – check welder quals,

equipment calibration, consumables, procedures, physical welding, hydrotest reports, paint reports etc. • That supplier personnel are in possession of the correct, current & applicable documents (specs /

procedures etc). • That JFJV Inspector is in possession of all relevant documentation (PO / Requisition / DEPs / Procedures

etc). Verify the code status of the documents. Ensure approval Code 2 or Code 1 documents are used by the supplier and EPC inspector

• That resources and facilities for the next stages of fabrication are in place and available for the order to progress.

• Flawless activities have been addressed / cleared by the supplier and verified by the JFJV inspector. • Make specific reference to the Intertek Flawless requirements (Tightness / Cleanliness / Preservation /

Integrity). • Review the status of any NCR’s that have been issued by the JFJV inspector or the supplier. • Compliance verification with Canadian Regulatory requirements i.e., CSA, BC regulatory requirements,

BC RE stamp traceable from shop drawings to the IFC drawings etc. • Compliance verification of vendor HAZOP action item close out as well as Human Factor Engineering

incorporated into the IFC packages (this an area that usually does not get the appropriate attention it deserves)

• Compliance understanding and verification of main supplier to sub suppliers with DEM1 and TIV (SCE) Items during fabrication

• Verify material traceability of main supplier and sub supplier as it relates to preventing the counterfeit material use particularly on packages. Do not sign any material certificates or test documents unless advised by LNGC Representative.

• Verify main supplier and sub supplier access to DEP and SPEP requirements as applicable.

REV22 of 12

• Check to verify if main suppliers and sub suppliers were briefed on and committed to their role within the FPD plan as identified.

• Check to verify what MDR is accompanying the shipment and verify CSA and BC RE Stamps as identified in the ITP. Use PO as basis of reference

• Do a random qualification check on front line QC inspectors, welders, NDT to see whether they have valid tickets/ certification and ensure verification of the related procedures/ process is available for compliance

• Verify sub suppliers involved in the PO and what type of service they provide to ensure they are well known in the market and are they listed with the main supplier.

• Consultant to read any previous JFJV reports, if provided as part of the Assignment Documents, in order to understand the observations and the status of the inspection points that were completed by JFJV . Do not copy of cut and paste sentences from the JFJV Report when preparing the Intertek Report.

Consultants should focus and develop a conscious desire on ensuring that the Project quality requirements

stipulated in project standards and specifications are well understood by JFJV and its suppliers and that JFJV’s QMS is well developed and effectively implemented to manage identified risks by competent personnel.

JFJV Document Approval Codes are as follows:

Code 1 Approved Approved For Use

Code 2 Approved – Include Comments in Next Revision Approved For Use

Code 3 Revise and Resubmit for Approval Issued For Review

REV2 3 of 12

1. FPD Risk Areas

The potential risk areas that shall be monitored by Consultants are listed in the table below

Risk of Repeated Failure Areas and Description

Flawless Risk Area Brief Scope

Tightness The leak free operation of all components

Cleanliness The absence of all debris from piping, assemblies, and componentry

Preservation All activities necessary to maintain the integrity of the MATERIALS to the requirements and standards set forth in the specifications.

Integrity Components and system functioning as designed for each engineering discipline (examples include Process, Static Equipment, Rotating Equipment, Instrumentation, Electrical, Civil, etc…)

Operability/

Maintainability

Requirements required to safely perform all operational and maintenance activities during execution and operational life of the system with ease and speed and without unscheduled downtime

HSE in Transition Transition’s from one HSE system to another (Combined worksites, commissioning and start-up)

Novelty First time or limited history in applying the technology, working methods or conditions, and/or procedures

Complexity Complex systems such as multi-plexed control systems

Note: COMPANY may define other risk of repeated failure areas as required by the project.

2. Quality Assurance Plans for FPD Risk Areas

Consultants shall review the below assuarnce plans as applicable during the inspection visit

1. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q01- Tightness JFJV L001-00000-OA-5876-1002 2. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q02- Cleanliness & Preservation JFJV L001-00000-OA-5876-1004 3. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03A- Process JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1004 4. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03B- Mechanical Static JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1005 5. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03C- Mechanical Rotating JFJV L001-00000-OA-5876-1006 6. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03D- Instrument JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1007 7. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03E- Electrical JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1008 8. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q03F- Civil JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1009 9. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q04- Operability & Maintainability JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1010 10. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q05- HSE In Transition JFJV L001-00000-OA- 5876-1011 11. FPD Q-Assurance Plan for Q06 & Q07- Novelty & Complexity JFJV L001-00000-OA-5876-1012

REV2 4 of 12

3. Description and potential consequences of FPD Risk Areas

Q01 – Tightness Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Tightness Q-Area is to prevent leaks during Commissioning, start-up and first operational cycle.

Tightness of a system has two elements, external and internal.

External Tightness

External Tightness focuses on the leak free operation of all system connections including flanges, caps, manholes, pump casings, compressor casings, instrument fittings, and all other joints that require sealing for operation of a system.

Internal Tightness

Internal Tightness focuses on the internal leak free operation of critical valves, especially valves classified as ESD (Emergency Shutdown), TSO (Tight shut off) and Critical Containment Valves (CCVs).

Health (exposure of personnel)

Safety (fire, explosions, injuries)

Environmental incidents (emissions to water, air and soil)

Unplanned shutdowns

Energy loss (leaking steam)

Extra repair work

Risks to reputation (“visual” releases, wet floors/plumes)

Off-spec products

Loss of effective containment in case of emergencies

Q02 – Cleanliness & Preservation Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Cleanliness & Preservation Q-Area is to ensure all systems, equipment and components are “clean” and “preserved” at handover and start-up.

“Clean” means having been proven to meet all agreed Cleanliness criteria. Cleanliness of a system is essential for a “first time right” start-up. Emphasis should be placed on building a clean Plant.

“Preserved” means have been proven to meet all agreed Vendor, Preservation Specification and Preservation Plan requirements.

Obstruction of process streams (plugging of filters, plugged elbows)

Integrity problems (malfunctioning of instruments, damage of valves)

Damage of rotating equipment

Plugging of drains, heat exchanger tubes, leaking/damaged seals)

Heat transfer problems (fouling, obstructions)

Contamination of products

Corrosion

REV2 5 of 12

Water left in cryogenic service systems causing freezing / blocking

Q03A - Process Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Process Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that the process, i.e. the combination of feedstock, process materials, hardware, controls and operating activities, is capable of realizing the design intent and that the process Plant operates within the design envelope.

It typically addresses feed/product and consumables specifications, reliability modelling, Operating Modes Assurance Reviews (OMAR), the impact of fouling on the design, process monitoring and sampling, internals design & inspection and catalyst loading.

During start-up and normal operations, inadequate process design could cause different types of problems, i.e. capacity bottlenecks, unit trips due to wrong assumptions in process conditions, contamination leading to delays, margin losses extra operator’s attention, shut down of facilities to

Q03B – Static Equipment Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Static Integrity Q-Area is to ensure no loss of containment from any system, equipment, and vessel or pipe operating within design and test parameters and that all internals (trays, down comers, demister pads and weirs) are in place and in the correct orientation.

It addresses internal and external corrosion resulting in leaks / damage / fracture / rupture of equipment / piping / welds / support, incorrect installation of equipment, internals (link with Process Integrity) and Preservation.

The consequence of mechanical integrity failure in critical areas of a plant can be catastrophic. Moreover, any failure shall cause substantial re-work, contractual start-up dates, emergency situations (including slow & shut downs), and substantial reputation issues.

Q03C – Rotating Equipment Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Rotating Equipment Integrity Q-Area is to ensure mechanical rotating equipment performs as per the original design intent for all operating modes.

It addresses bearing / coupling / complete failures, excessive vibration and noise, seal / flange / casing / lube oil leakages and failures, unauthorised deviations from JFJV Vendors or Subcontractors (such as incomplete/incorrect mechanical installation, cleanliness / fouling / corrosion / erosion or incorrect preservation.

The consequence of mechanical integrity failure in critical areas of a plant can be catastrophic. Moreover, any failure shall cause substantial re-work, contractual start-up dates, emergency situations (including slow & shut downs), and substantial reputation issues.

Q03D - Instrument Integrity Potential consequences

REV2 6 of 12

The primary purpose of the Instrument Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that all control and safeguarding systems, including their field instrumentation, perform as per design intent, both in static and in a dynamic mode.

It typically addresses problems with process control, (field) instruments, online and in-line instrumentation, analysers, DCS, decentralised control systems, and instrumented protective systems.

The consequence of Instrument Flaws could range from operational inconveniences to a shutdown of the entire facility. To remedy such Flaws at start-up, it may be required to re-design, to exchange non-performing instruments / control valves, to reconfigure control and protection systems. Generally, this leads to delays in start-up or plant downtime.

Q03E - Electrical Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Electrical Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that all electrical systems and components function as per design intent.

It typically addresses the ability of the electrical system (hardware and software) to provide a safe and reliable energy supply, resilient to operational change and upsets, through a fit for purpose design, equipment selection, installation, Commissioning, testing and Start-up.

Problems with Electrical Integrity shall lead to delays in the construction, commissioning and start-up of the asset as well as uncomfortable working situations for operations and maintenance teams. Due to the nature of the electrical system, Electrical Integrity problems may also lead to unsafe situations, poor reliability performance, production losses, and excessive operating costs over the life cycle of the asset.

Q03B – Static Equipment Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Static Integrity Q-Area is to ensure no loss of containment from any system, equipment, and vessel or pipe operating within design and test parameters and that all internals (trays, down comers, demister pads and weirs) are in place and in the correct orientation.

It addresses internal and external corrosion resulting in leaks / damage / fracture / rupture of equipment / piping / welds / support, incorrect installation of equipment, internals (link with Process Integrity) and Preservation.

The consequence of mechanical integrity failure in critical areas of a plant can be catastrophic. Moreover, any failure shall cause substantial re-work, contractual start-up dates, emergency situations (including slow & shut downs), and substantial reputation issues.

Q03C – Rotating Equipment Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Rotating Equipment Integrity Q-Area is to ensure mechanical rotating equipment performs as per the original design intent for all operating modes.

It addresses bearing / coupling / complete failures, excessive vibration and noise, seal / flange / casing / lube oil leakages and failures, unauthorised deviations from JFJV Vendors or

The consequence of mechanical integrity failure in critical areas of a plant can be catastrophic. Moreover, any failure shall cause substantial re-work, contractual start-up dates, emergency situations (including slow &

REV2 7 of 12

Subcontractors (such as incomplete/incorrect mechanical installation, cleanliness / fouling / corrosion / erosion or incorrect preservation.

shut downs), and substantial reputation issues.

Q03D - Instrument Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Instrument Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that all control and safeguarding systems, including their field instrumentation, perform as per design intent, both in static and in a dynamic mode.

It typically addresses problems with process control, (field) instruments, online and in-line instrumentation, analysers, DCS, decentralised control systems, and instrumented protective systems.

The consequence of Instrument Flaws could range from operational inconveniences to a shutdown of the entire facility. To remedy such Flaws at start-up, it may be required to re-design, to exchange non-performing instruments / control valves, to reconfigure control and protection systems. Generally, this leads to delays in start-up or plant downtime.

Q03E - Electrical Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Electrical Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that all electrical systems and components function as per design intent.

It typically addresses the ability of the electrical system (hardware and software) to provide a safe and reliable energy supply, resilient to operational change and upsets, through a fit for purpose design, equipment selection, installation, Commissioning, testing and Start-up.

Problems with Electrical Integrity shall lead to delays in the construction, commissioning and start-up of the asset as well as uncomfortable working situations for operations and maintenance teams. Due to the nature of the electrical system, Electrical Integrity problems may also lead to unsafe situations, poor reliability performance, production losses, and excessive operating costs over the life cycle of the asset.

Q03F - Civil Integrity Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the Civil Integrity Q-Area is to ensure that all civil and structural components of the scope function as per design intent.

It typically addresses problems with performance of the civil assets and systems, such as table tops, pipe racks, refractory, linings, and drainage systems in both a static and dynamic manner.

Risk of fire and pollution

Q04 – Operability & Maintainability Potential consequences

REV2 8 of 12

The primary purpose of the Operability & Maintainability Q-Area is to ensure that the facilities are designed and constructed such that all operational and maintenance activities can be performed easily and quickly, with all HSSE Risks as low as reasonably practicable during all project phases and the normal life cycle of the facility.

It addresses problems with draining, accessibility, operability & maintainability of equipment, mechanical isolation, and potential exposure of workers to intolerable levels of noise or contamination, alarm overload and poor operation interfaces.

Problems in these areas can lead to unsafe situations, poor reliability, performance, lost production time and excessive operating costs over the life cycle of the facilities.

Q05 – HSE in Transition Potential consequences

The primary purpose of the HSE in Transition Q-Area is to ensure that the HSE risks during Commissioning and start-up (the transition phase between detailed engineering and construction on one hand and permanent operations on the other) are identified, prioritized and effectively mitigated.

It typically addresses problems with HSE competency, organization & communication, parallel activities, introduction of new hazards, evacuation & emergency response, good housekeeping, waste management and environmental protection, use of temporary equipment.

Failure to recognise, mitigate & control the HSE aspects of the commissioning phase of the project shall lead to confusion, delays, and shall create the potential for incidents, accidents and injuries.

Q06 – Novelty & Q07 – Complexity Potential consequences

Novelty

The primary purpose of the Novelty Q-Area is to ensure that novelties are identified as early as possible and the risks they bring to the CSU phase and first operational cycle are identified, prioritized and effectively mitigated.

Two types of novelties exist:

• True prototypes (where there is no proven successful operation anywhere in the world);

• “Other novelties” (proven technical application, but new to LNGC, project team, supplier, application, environment etc.).

Surprises during the various project phases: commissioning, start-up or in the operational phase.

Trial and error mode of commissioning and start-up.

Schedule delay (and in some cases a “show stopper” causing a substantial delay).

Surprises during the various project phases, commissioning and start-up or in the operational phase.

Trial and error mode of CSU. Schedule delay.

REV2 9 of 12

Complexity

The primary purpose of the Complexity Q-Area is to ensure that complex systems are identified as early as possible and the risks they bring to the CSU phase and first operational cycle are identified, prioritized and effectively mitigated.

A complex system is defined as any system, of which the functioning or the internal mechanics is not obvious for an experienced operator, e.g.:

• Instrumentation & complex controls and safeguarding;

• Complicated rotating equipment;

• Complicated operational switches in line-up, operating modes.

Complex process systems are characterized by multiple inputs and outputs with a high level o

REV2 10 of 12

LNGC VENDOR INSPECTION CHECKLIST The following checklist should be used as a guideline to assist in surveillance visits in addition to any NOI scope of inspection requirements & should be read in conjunction with the Assignment Instructions.

This information should be expanded into the Section 6 of the report and should NOT be simply cut and paste into the report. This should also not be added as an attachment to the Inspection Report.

Query Requirement JFJV Inspector Supplier

PO / Requisition Are the JFJV Inspector and Supplier in possession of the documents.

☐ ☐

Visit / NOI Specific Documentation (Test Procedures / WPS/PQR / DEP Specs / Code etc)

Are the JFJV Inspector and Supplier in possession of the documents.

☐ ☐

Query Requirement

Yes No

MDR Status Check Does the MDR compilation reflect the current stage of fabrication and test.

☐ ☐

ITP Status Has the ITP been signed off by JFJV and suppliers for all activities to date – quote revision / approval code.

☐ ☐

WPS/PQR Are the documents approved / visible / in use? Were approved welders utilised?

☐ ☐

Order Progression Are the resources / documents / facilities in place for the next stage of fabrication (eg if next stage is painting is the paint procedure approved?)

☐ ☐

Flawless Have you reviewed Flawless with the supplier. Are FDP poster visible?

☐ ☐

Flawless Have you checked the Intertek Flawless requirements (Tightness Cleanliness / Preservation / Integrity)

☐ ☐

REV2 11 of 12

Does the Supplier understand the requirements for compliance verification with :

Yes No

Canadian Regulatory Requirements ☐ ☐

Vendor HAZOP ☐ ☐

DEM1 / TIV ☐ ☐

NCR Status Vendor Issued JFJV Issued

Have any NCR’s been issued on this order ☐ ☐

Are there any open NCR’s ☐ ☐

Other issues to consider Yes No

Random Checks on test / measuring equipment. Are items in calibration?

☐ ☐

Can supplier demonstrate material traceability? ☐ ☐

Is workshop clean / tidy? ☐ ☐

Are there any general areas of concern? ☐ ☐

In your opinion is delivery date going to be achieved? ☐ ☐

Using the above information please expand on each point and included in Section 6 of the report (and the relevant Flawless / Competency / Performance Sections) in the report.

REV2 12 of 12

DOCUMENT NUMBERING STANDARDS FOR LNGC PROJECT. Document number for Assignment and Visit documents, Reports and attachments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

OSBL-68764-2-1-PF216A-112-B-IR01 -REV0-HDPE Pipe Field 1 = Project level – ISBL – Inside Battery Limits / OSBL – Outside Battery Limits Field 2 = Project # EVO generated number with PO to Intertek related Project Name Field 3 = Assignment / Visit number

a. Two numbers separated with a “-“indicates if it’s an Assignment and a Visit assigned to the visit. If it’s an assignment document, visit number do not exist. Eg. OSBL-67546-2-PF216A-112-B-AI01-Assignment document-REV0

Field 4 = PO Number – Field 5 = Document Type – Inspection Report, VAP, PIM etc. Field 6 = Document # / Sequential Number (Part of Field5) Field 7 = Revision # Field 8 = Description Any documents related Supplier (Supplier PO, ITPs should be stored under Supplier PO – Documents TAB Some examples of Document numbering…. For assignment documents such as Notice of Inspection, Assignment Instruction: OSBL-68764-1-PJ216D-171C-NOI01-REV0-Flanges For assignment documents for TS Reference and Pre-Inspection requirements: OSBL -68764-1-PJ216D-171C-ASD01-Rpts_MOM For Flash Report 01 on a sample assignment / visit: OSBL -68764-1-1-PJ216D-171C-FR01-REV0-Flanges For Inspection Report 01 on a sample assignment / visit: OSBL -68764-1-1-PJ216D-171C-IR01-REV0-Flanges For Inspection Report Backup Documents: OSBL-68764-1-1-PJ216D-171C-BCR01-Flanges-Backup Docs NCR on same : OSBL -68764-1-1- PJ216D 171C-NCR01-REV0-Flanges Timesheet on same : (PO to Intertek is used here) OSBL -68764-1-1-4513424116- LastName, FirstName -TimesheetWK26 Receipts from TS on same : OSBL -68764-1-1-4513424116- LastName, FirstName-RCT01-AirTicket OSBL -68764-1-1-4513424116- LastName, FirstName-RCT02-Lodging

Kindly refer to the sample report with comments enclosed below.

INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of 4

EVO Job No:

68764-3 Report No: OSBL-68764-3-1-PO#-IR01-REV01

Date ofReport: 09 Jul 2019 Customer: LNG Canada

Title LNG Canada Inspection

Report Form

Form Number MI1220-01-LNGC

Revision 1

mm/dd/yyyy 12/20/2019

Instructions LNGC

CUSTOMER DATA INTERTEK DATA

Name: LNG Canada Development Inc. 400, 4th Ave S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2HS

Intertek Project No. 68764-3 Address:

Attn: Essam Elnahrawy Phone: +1 403 973 7114Intertek Contract Coordinator: Anil Varghese E-Mail : Essam.E.Elnahrawy@lngcanada.ca

Copies to:

SUPPLIER/SUB-SUPPLIER DATA VISIT INFORMATION Inspection Performed: With Customer Supplier With Sub-Supplier Date(s) of Visit(s):

P.O. No: Change No: Requisition No: Date of Previous Visit:

Supplier: Date of Next Scheduled Visit:

Supplier Job No: P. O. Status: Complete Incomplete

Location: Materials/Items Inspected:

Primary Contact:

Phone: E-mail :

Sub-supplier:

Sub-Supplier Job No:

Location: Inspection Level:

Primary Contact:

Criticality Rating: Phone: E-mail :

INSPECTION DISPOSITION: Accept Nonconformance(s) Identified Placed on Hold Issue / Concern Other (Explain)

VISIT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:

Number of Points Missed Completed Total Witness

Hold RECOMMENDED ACTION AND AREAS OF CONCERN:

INSPECTION TIME HOURS TRAVEL HOURS :

DISTANCE: MI KM

Assessor / Inspector Date:

Quality Record Specialist :

Anil Varghese

This report is made solely on the basis of the Client’s instructions and/or information and materials supplied. It is not intended to be a recommendation for any particular course of action. Intertek does not accept a duty of care or any other responsibility to any person other than the Client in respect of this report and only accepts liability to the Client insofar as is expressly contained in the terms and conditions governing Intertek's provision of services. Intertek makes no warranties or representations either express or implied with respect to this report save as provided for in those terms and conditions.

INSPECTION REPORT (continuation page) Page 2 of 4

Evo Job No: 68682-3 Report No: Date of Report: 09 Jul 2019 Customer : LNG Canada

Title LNG Canada Inspection

Report Form

Form Number MI1220-01-LNGC

Revision 1

mm/dd/yyyy 12/20/2019

Instructions LNGC

1.0 ATTENDEES

NAME COMPANY REPRESENTED TITLE

2.0 MATERIALS

2.1 GENERIC MATERIALS

TAG / EQPT NO. DESCRIPTION

2.2 MATERIALS INSPECTED

PO ITEM NO. TAG / SERIAL NO. PRODUCT / MATERIAL / ITEM NAME

ORDERED QUANTITY

PRESENTED THIS VISIT

ACCEPTED THIS VISIT

QUANTITY ACCEPTED TO DATE

3.0 DOCUMENTS USED

DOCUMENT NO. REVISION TITLE LNGC

COMMENTS INCLUDED

APPROVAL STATUS

4.0 SCOPE OF INSPECTION

ITP LINE NO. ITP ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION RESULTS SECTION 6 REF.

5.0 EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION USED (TO BE SUPPLIED BY SUPPLIER)

EQUIPMENT / INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO CALIBRATION CERT. NO. EXPIRY DATE

OSBL-68764-3-1-PO#-IR01-REV01

INSPECTION REPORT (continuation page) Page 3 of 4

Evo Job No: 68682-3 Report No: IR01 Date of Report: 09 Jul 2019 Customer : LNG Canada

Title LNG Canada Inspection

Report Form

Form Number MI1220-01-LNGC

Revision 1

mm/dd/yyyy 12/20/2019

Instructions LNGC

6.0 INSPECTION DETAILS

7.0 ISSUES / CONCERNS DETAILED

ISSUE / CONCERN NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

8.0 NON-CONFORMANCES

NCR # DESCRIPTION DATE RAISED DATE CLOSED

9.0 CANADIAN REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

In Compliance Not In Compliance NA

Comments

10.0 FLAWLESS PROJECT DELIVERY

Tightness Result: Comments:

Cleanliness Result: Comments:

Preservation Result: Comments:

Integrity Result: Comments:

Other Result: Comments:

INSPECTION REPORT (continuation page) Page 4 of 4

Evo Job No: 68682-3 Report No: IR01 Date of Report: 09 Jul 2019 Customer : LNG Canada

Title

LNG Canada Inspection Report Form

Form Number MI1220-01-LNGC

Revision 1

mm/dd/yyyy 12/20/2019

Instructions LNGC

11.0 COMPETENCY AND PERFORMANCE OF EPC’S Competency

Performance

12.0 ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REPORT

13.0 PHOTOGRAPHS END OF THIS REPORT

EPC INSPECTOR Result: Comments:

SUPPLIERS QC Result: Comments:

EPC INSPECTOR Result: Comments:

SUPPLIERS QC Result: Comments: