12
The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993, 13(7): 31123123 lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein Adriana Ferreira, Alfred0 Caceres, and Kenneth S. Kosik Harvard Medical School and Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Medicine (Division of Neurology), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the parent molecule from which fl-amyloid protein is cleaved and deposits as amyloid fibrils in the senile plaques of Alrheimer’s disease. Its primary structure resembles a receptor; however, no li- gand has been identified. In growing hippocampal neurons APP is localized to growth cones. APP immunoreactivity was highly enriched in the axons of mature cultured neurons, where it appears as a specialization of the axonal mem- brane. Its anterograde translocation occurs via a kinesin- based motor. Following cytosolic acidification, APP colo- calizes with late endosomes that get redistributed from the neuronal cell body to the processes. APP colocalizes in cul- tured hippocampal neurons to clathrin-immunoreactive clus- ters of vesicular-like structures. The finding lends additional credence to the possibility that APP could function as a receptor. [Key words: hippocampal neurons, clathrin, endosomes, kinesin, antisense, endocytosis] Cellsmusttarget proteins to specific classes oforganellesin order to segregate molecules within discretecellular locales. Polarized cells have the added task of directing organelles correctly to large cellular regions such as the apical versusthe basalsurface in epithelial cells, or the axon versus the dendrite in neurons. Understandingthe systems by which proteins move to the mem- brane and get secreted, as well as their intracellular membrane compartments, represents a crucial phase in ascertaining a nor- mal role for the amyloid precursor protein (APP). APP was discovered as the parent molecule of a much smaller fragment that deposits in the senileplaques and in many cerebral blood vessels in Alzheimer’s disease (for review, see Kosik, 1992). Therefore, the processing of this molecule is important because a proteolytic product, designated P-AP, forms the amyloid fi- brils. The precise intraneuronal localization of APP has not been established. Even less is known about its neuronal localization during neuronal development. The first clue regardinglocaliza- tion came from the primary structure of APP, which resembles a glycosylated cell surfacereceptor (Kang et al., 1987). Isoforms that are both N- and 0-glycosylated have been described (Wei- demann et al., 1989) and cleaved forms of the precursor are secretedinto the media of cell cultures. One of these forms is Received Nov. 13, 1992; revised Feb. 3, 1993; accepted Feb. 8, 1993. This work was supported by NIH Grant AGO6601 and a Zenith fellowship from the Alzheimer’s Association to K.S.K. Correspondence should be addressed to Kenneth S. Kosik, M.D., Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue (LMRC), Boston, MA 02 115. Copyright 0 1993 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/93/133112-12$05.00/O the serine proteaseinhibitor proteasenexin II (Van Nostrand and Cunningham, 1987). In neuronal cellslittle is known about how APP is targeted to the membraneother than the report that APP moves in the rapid phase of axonal transport (Koo et al., 1990) suggesting that after its glycosylation, APP associates with an anterogradely moving organelle in the trans-Golgi com- partment. In addition to its secretion, APP is associated with the endosomal/lysosomal compartment (Estus et al., 1992; Golde et al., 1992; Haass et al., 1992). An NPXY sequence located in the cytoplasmic tail of APP is presumablyinvolved in this tar- geting. The normal APP gene product is expressed in many different tissues and cell types at quite variable levels. It is most abundant in neurons as detected by in situ hybridization (Bahmanyar et al., 1988; Bendotti et al., 1988; Cohen et al., 1988; Shivers et al., 1988). Among brain regions the highest levels are in the olfactory areas,cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and cerebellum(Shivers et al., 1988).The localization of the protein immunocytochemically is also in general, concordant with a predominantly neuronal localization (Card et al., 1988;Shivers et al., 1988). In these publishedmicrographs there is a significant degree of variation among neuronal populations in the intensity of APP staining even within an anatomically restricted area. Higher-resolution electron microscopic studies describe colo- calization of APP with synaptophysin at synaptic sites and with vesicular elementsin human and rat neurons (Schubert et al., 1991). In some cell types of the adenohypophysisAPP anti- bodies labeledsome secretory granules (Catterucia et al., 1990). These patterns were reported to differ from that obtained with an antiserum against lysosomes (Shivers et al., 1988). The localization of APP in neurons must be placed in the context of the known intracellular pathways by which mem- brane-bound organelles move through cells. Little isknown about the membranetrafficking events in neurons,which due to their highly polar structures,and long processes presentunique prob- lems in the routing of organelles. The absence of protein syn- thesis in the axon requires the delivery of proteins over long distances rather than local synthesis. It hasbeen proposed that epithelial cells and neurons utilize similar mechanisms to sort certain glycoproteins (Dotti and Simons, 1990). In epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, newly synthesized proteins targeted for either the apical or the basolateral mem- branes travel together in the trans-Golgi network, from where apical proteins are transcytosedto the apical membrane. (Grif- fiths and Simons, 1986; Hughson et al., 1988). Using the viral glycoprotein products of the vesicular stomatitis virus, which in MDCK cells is a basolateralprotein, there was localization to dendrites. In contrast, the hemagglutinin protein of the in- fluenza fowl plague virus, which in MDCK cells is apically sort-

lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993, 13(7): 31123123

lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein

Adriana Ferreira, Alfred0 Caceres, and Kenneth S. Kosik

Harvard Medical School and Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Medicine (Division of Neurology), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the parent molecule from which fl-amyloid protein is cleaved and deposits as amyloid fibrils in the senile plaques of Alrheimer’s disease. Its primary structure resembles a receptor; however, no li- gand has been identified. In growing hippocampal neurons APP is localized to growth cones. APP immunoreactivity was highly enriched in the axons of mature cultured neurons, where it appears as a specialization of the axonal mem- brane. Its anterograde translocation occurs via a kinesin- based motor. Following cytosolic acidification, APP colo- calizes with late endosomes that get redistributed from the neuronal cell body to the processes. APP colocalizes in cul- tured hippocampal neurons to clathrin-immunoreactive clus- ters of vesicular-like structures. The finding lends additional credence to the possibility that APP could function as a receptor.

[Key words: hippocampal neurons, clathrin, endosomes, kinesin, antisense, endocytosis]

Cells must target proteins to specific classes oforganelles in order to segregate molecules within discrete cellular locales. Polarized cells have the added task of directing organelles correctly to large cellular regions such as the apical versus the basal surface in epithelial cells, or the axon versus the dendrite in neurons. Understanding the systems by which proteins move to the mem- brane and get secreted, as well as their intracellular membrane compartments, represents a crucial phase in ascertaining a nor- mal role for the amyloid precursor protein (APP). APP was discovered as the parent molecule of a much smaller fragment that deposits in the senile plaques and in many cerebral blood vessels in Alzheimer’s disease (for review, see Kosik, 1992). Therefore, the processing of this molecule is important because a proteolytic product, designated P-AP, forms the amyloid fi- brils.

The precise intraneuronal localization of APP has not been established. Even less is known about its neuronal localization during neuronal development. The first clue regarding localiza- tion came from the primary structure of APP, which resembles a glycosylated cell surface receptor (Kang et al., 1987). Isoforms that are both N- and 0-glycosylated have been described (Wei- demann et al., 1989) and cleaved forms of the precursor are secreted into the media of cell cultures. One of these forms is

Received Nov. 13, 1992; revised Feb. 3, 1993; accepted Feb. 8, 1993. This work was supported by NIH Grant AGO6601 and a Zenith fellowship

from the Alzheimer’s Association to K.S.K. Correspondence should be addressed to Kenneth S. Kosik, M.D., Center for

Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue (LMRC), Boston, MA 02 115. Copyright 0 1993 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/93/133112-12$05.00/O

the serine protease inhibitor protease nexin II (Van Nostrand and Cunningham, 1987). In neuronal cells little is known about how APP is targeted to the membrane other than the report that APP moves in the rapid phase of axonal transport (Koo et al., 1990) suggesting that after its glycosylation, APP associates with an anterogradely moving organelle in the trans-Golgi com- partment. In addition to its secretion, APP is associated with the endosomal/lysosomal compartment (Estus et al., 1992; Golde et al., 1992; Haass et al., 1992). An NPXY sequence located in the cytoplasmic tail of APP is presumably involved in this tar- geting.

The normal APP gene product is expressed in many different tissues and cell types at quite variable levels. It is most abundant in neurons as detected by in situ hybridization (Bahmanyar et al., 1988; Bendotti et al., 1988; Cohen et al., 1988; Shivers et al., 1988). Among brain regions the highest levels are in the olfactory areas, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and cerebellum (Shivers et al., 1988). The localization of the protein immunocytochemically is also in general, concordant with a predominantly neuronal localization (Card et al., 1988; Shivers et al., 1988). In these published micrographs there is a significant degree of variation among neuronal populations in the intensity of APP staining even within an anatomically restricted area. Higher-resolution electron microscopic studies describe colo- calization of APP with synaptophysin at synaptic sites and with vesicular elements in human and rat neurons (Schubert et al., 1991). In some cell types of the adenohypophysis APP anti- bodies labeled some secretory granules (Catterucia et al., 1990). These patterns were reported to differ from that obtained with an antiserum against lysosomes (Shivers et al., 1988).

The localization of APP in neurons must be placed in the context of the known intracellular pathways by which mem- brane-bound organelles move through cells. Little is known about the membrane trafficking events in neurons, which due to their highly polar structures, and long processes present unique prob- lems in the routing of organelles. The absence of protein syn- thesis in the axon requires the delivery of proteins over long distances rather than local synthesis. It has been proposed that epithelial cells and neurons utilize similar mechanisms to sort certain glycoproteins (Dotti and Simons, 1990). In epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, newly synthesized proteins targeted for either the apical or the basolateral mem- branes travel together in the trans-Golgi network, from where apical proteins are transcytosed to the apical membrane. (Grif- fiths and Simons, 1986; Hughson et al., 1988). Using the viral glycoprotein products of the vesicular stomatitis virus, which in MDCK cells is a basolateral protein, there was localization to dendrites. In contrast, the hemagglutinin protein of the in- fluenza fowl plague virus, which in MDCK cells is apically sort-

Page 2: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience. July 1993. f3(7) 3113

ed, was preferentially targeted to the axon (Dotti and Simons, 1990).

Dissociated rat hippocampal neurons are an intensively stud- ied culture system that can sometimes reveal the cytological localization of a protein whose localization in tissue sections is obscured by the complex interrelationships among cells in neu- ral tissue. We have localized APP to the growing tips of neurites in hippocampal neurons in culture. During maturation in cul- ture we were able to inhibit the transport of APP to the tips of processes in the presence of kincsin antisense oligonucleotides. Here we have presented evidence for the association of APP with certain classes of membrane-bound organelles in neurons, particularly clusters of clathrin-coated vesicles and late cndo- somes. The common use of this internalization pathway by receptors provides indirect evidence that APP may serve as a receptor for which a ligand has not yet been identified.

Materials and Methods Cultures. Cultures were prepared from the hippocampi of embryonic day I8 rats as previously described (Bartlett and Banker, 1984). In brief, cells from the dissected hippocampi were dissociated by trypsinization (0.25% for 15 min at 37°C) followed bv trituration with a lire-oolished Pasteur pipette. For immunofluorescencc the cells were plated at a den- sity of 100,000 cells/60 mm Petri dish on glass coverslips coated with poly-r-lysine (I mg/ml) in minimum essential medium (MEM) with 10% horse serum. In antisense experiments, cells were plated onto l2- mm-diameter coverslips in 35 mm dishes. After 2-4 hr the medium was changed to I ml of MEM with N2 supplements (Bottenstein and Sato, 1979) ovalbumin (0.1%) and pyruvate (0.01 mg/ml) that had been conditioned in cultures of astroglial cells for 24 hr and the cells were left faceup. All cultures used in immunolocalization studies were cocultured with astroglia.

Antisense oligonucleotides. The kinesin heavy chain was inhibited with antiscnse oligonucleotides as described previously (Fcrreira et al., 1992). The antisense oligonucleotide - I I + I4 rkin used in these ex- periments consists of the sequence GCCGGGTCCGCCATCITTCTG GCAG and is the inverse complement of the rat nucleotides - I I to + 14. The oligonucleotides were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems 3808 synthesizer, purified over an NAP5 column (Pharmacia), ethanol precipitated, and taken up in media. The administration of the oligo- nucleotide was as follows. At 24 hr after plating, when the cells were transferred to serum-free glia-conditioned medium, the oligonucleotide was added at 50 PM. The medium was supplemented with 25 NM ad- ditional oligonucleotide every I2 hr from the time of plating for either 24 or 48 hr. Controls were treated with the same concentration and dosage schedule of the corresponding sense-strand oligonucleotide.

Acid$cation medra and Luc&?r yellow labeling. The procedure for the pH-induced redistribution of the late cndosomes is as described by Heuser (I 989). The buffers used were Rinser’s solution I I55 mM NaCI. 5 mM KC]. 2 mu CaCI,, I mM MgCI,, 2 &I NaH,PO,,‘lO mM HEPES pH 7.20, IO mM glucose, 0.5 mg/ml BSA) and acetate Ringer’s that involved the following changes: 80 mM NaCI, 70 mM Na-acetate, IO mM HEPES. oH 6.90. This more acidic DH was shown to oroduce a redistributidn’of the late endosomes in neurons (Parton et al., 1991). Cells were incubated in Lucifer yellow (dilithium salt, Sigma Chemical Co.) at a concentration of IO mg/ml in glia-conditioned medium for 30 min at 37°C followed by a 30 min chase in medium. After the chase cells were incubated in acetate Ringer’s pH 6.90 for I5 minor in Ringer’s pH 7.2 and then fixed for immunostainingand fluorescence microscopy.

Immunodefection. For immunostaining the cultures were fixed for 20 min with warm 4% formaldehyde in PBS containing 0.12 M sucrose, permeabilized in 0.3% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature, and rinsed in PBS. Cultures were incubated with 10% BSA for I hr at 37°C and then exposed to primary antibody or antibodies (diluted in 1% BSAIPBS) overnight at 4°C. The antibodies used were C7 and C6, polyclonal antibodies raised against the carboxy terminus of APP (pep- tides 676-695), diluted I :50 (Selkoe et al., 1988; Hass et al., I99 1). gifts from Dennis Selkoe (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA); a poly- clonal antibody against the clathrin heavy chain (Sigma Chemical Co.), used at a dilution of l:40; X16, a monoclonal antibody against the higher-molecular-weight clathrin light chain (Brodsky, 1985; Wong et al., 1990), used at dilution of 20 &ml, gift of Francis B&sky (Univ.

of Alabama, Birmingham, AL); APl4. a monoclonal antibody against MAP2 from Lester Binder (UCSF, San Francisco, CA) and used at a dilution of l:lOO; DMIB, a monoclonal antibody against @-tubulin (Boehringer), at a dilution of I: 1000; and a monoclonal antibody against synaptophysin (Boehringer), used at a dilution of l:20. The specificity of C7 was confirmed by an adsorption experiment in which staining was abolished following incubation with an excess of the peptide im- munogen.

The secondary antibodies used weregoat anti-mouse,goat anti-rabbit, or swine anti-goat IgG conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate or rho- damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling excer- 1 1 iments two antibodies were in&bated with the cells together in all cases except for the clathrin antibody. Since the clathrin antibody was made in goat, it required sequential immunolabeling.

Results APP localizalion during maturation ofcultured hippocampal neurons Antibodies directed against the carboxy-terminal region of APP label a distinctive pattern in hippocampal neurons. Shortly after plating, hippocampal neurons extend a lamellipodial veil (stage I) that later consolidates into several minor neurites (stage II). At stage II APP antibodies intensely labeled the growing tips of minor neurites as well as the cell body (Fig. IB). Tubulin is relatively excluded from this region (Fig. IA) as expected in the growth cone. Within the first 24 hr after plating hippocampal neurons selectively elongate one minor neurite that becomes the axon (stage III). Cells undergoing axonal elongation continue to demonstrate APP immunoreactivity at the tips ofthe elongating axon and at the tips of the minor neurites (Fig. IC,D). Higher- power views revealed that APP was present in the most distal portion of the growth cone, where lilopodia undergo rapid ex- tension and retraction (Fig. IF). This region of the growth cone contains bundles of actin filaments within the filopodial spikes and is relatively devoid of microtubules (Fig. 1 E). Growth cones have very diverse morphologies (Fig. l&H); however, even in less well spread growth cones the APP immunorcactivity is localized to the tip (Fig. 111). At approximately 72 hr the re- maining minor neurites of the hippocampal neurons undergo dendritic diffcrcntiation (stage IV). APP immunoreactivity is present at the tips ofelongating dendrites as visualized with two dillcrcnt APP antibodies (Fig. 2,4,R). Within the growth cones of ncurites APP immunoreactivity was lost after Triton extrac- tion, suggesting that its localization in the growth was not as- sociated with the cytoskeleton. Rare non-neural cells in the cul- ture were only faintly stained.

Because the localization ofAPP correlated well with the grow- ing tip of neurites, we sought to determine if the distribution of APP changed when neurons developed synaptic contacts. After 12-l 5 d in culture the site of APP immunoreactivity shifted from the growing tips to the shafts ofthc processes. Two patterns of staining were apparent. One was a diffuse staining along the entire process, a pattern observed in a subset of processes (Fig. 3R). The second pattern was a punctatc stain deposited in an irregular array along some processes (Fig. 30). This second pat- tern was seen in many of the processes, including those with the diffuse stain, and more commonly in those without diffuse staining. The shift to an axonal pattern began at approximately 12-l 5 d after plating. Comparison with a tubulin antibody was used to visualize the total population of processes (Fig. 3A,C).

The identity of APP-labeled processes was ascertained by double labeling with the somatodendritic marker protein MAP2 (microtubule-associated protein 2). APP was confined to pro- ccsscs that were not labeled by the MAP2 antibody (Fig. 4) suggesting an axonal localization of APP. Axons often grow

Page 3: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were
Page 4: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993, U(7) 3115

Figure 2. Stage IV hippocampal neurons with APP immunoreactivity in dendritic (den, small arrows) as well as axonal (ax, large arrows) growth cones. A and B represent the same cells double labeled with a tubulin antibody (A) and the APP antibody, C7 (B). Scale bar, 20 pm.

alongside the dendrite, and indeed, APP-labeled axons were often seen as thin structures that followed the course of the thicker dendrite labeled with MAP2 antibody (Fig. 4A,B). Den- drites labeled with APP antibodies at background levels or just slightly above background levels. Further evidence for the ax- onal localization was provided by low-density cultures. By 30 d hippocampal neurons elaborate a dense web of fine-caliber axons, often fasciculating with other processes, that extend far from the cell body. In contrast, dendrites are thickened, tapering processes that lie closer to the cell body. In fields sufficiently far from cell bodies where the dendrites were not present, MAP2 did not label any of the processes, whereas APP did (Fig. 4C,D).

APP colocalizes with clathrin-stained clusters of vesicular structures The punctate appearance of APP in the axons of hippocampal neurons suggested an association with membrane-bound organ- elles or clusters of membrane-bound organelles. Following ex- traction with 0.5% Triton X- 100 all APP immunoreactivity was

t

lost, but tubulin immunoreactivity was retained (data not shown). This finding implies that detergent-induced dissolution of the membrane released APP. The organelles labeled by APP anti- bodies were tentatively identified as clathrin-coated vesicles by precise colocalization with antibodies directed against clathrin heavy chain (Fig. 5). As described previously (Bloom et al., 1980) clathrin antibodies label large clusters of membrane-bound organelles in neurons. Within the regions of punctate label it was possible occasionally to observe clusters of dots (Fig. 5F). A subset of the axonal processes in culture labeled in this punc- tate pattern with both antibodies, suggesting that a subset of axons exists that is undergoing active internalization of APP. Clathrin antibody also labeled the growth cones of neurons in culture and densely labeled the cell body. As described above these sites of label were also detected with antibodies to APP. Clathrin labeling was observed in dendrites, a site from which APP was excluded.

The APP punctate stain often appeared positioned at points of contact between neuronal processes. It was therefore possible

Figure 1. Localization of APP to growth cones in developing hippocampal neurons in culture. A and B, Double-labeled stage II neuron with minor processes (mp) stained by a tubulin antibody (A) and by the APP antibody C7 (B). C and D, Double-labeled stage III neuron in which one process has differentiated into an axon (ax) stained by a tubulin antibody (C) and by the APP antibody C7 (D). The arrows point to axonal growth cones. E-H are higher-power views of staining in growth cones where the staining is confined to the most distal region of the tip. E and G are stained with the tubulin antibody, and F and H are stained with C7. Scale bars, 20 pm.

Page 5: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

3116 Ferreira et al. l Neuronal Compartments of APP

Figure 3. APP immunoreactivity in mature [30 d in vitro (DIV)] hippocampal neurons: double labeling (A and B are the same field, and C and D are the same field) with tubulin antibody (A, C) and with the APP antibody C7 (B, D). All of the processes are labeled in A and C, whereas a subset are labeled in B and D. APP-containing processes label in two patterns: diffusely (B) and punctate (0). The subset of processes with APP have the appearance of axons in that they are of relatively fine and uniform in caliber. Arrowheads indicate sites of contact between processes. Scale bar, 20 pm.

Page 6: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993, U(7) 3117

Figure 4. Axonal localization of APP in mature (30 DIV) hippocampal neurons: double labeling with MAP2 antibody AP 14 (A, C) and the APP antibody C7 (B, D). A and B are the same field, and C and D are the same field. MAP2 labels the dendrites seen as thick, tapering processes (A) that are shorter than axons and therefore not observed in fields more distant from cell bodies (C). C7 labels fine-caliber processes that as is characteristic of axons, may run along the dendrite, and in sparsely plated cultures, extend farther from the cell bodies (0). Scale bar, 20 pm.

Page 7: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

Figure 5. Clathrin heavy-chain staining colocalizes with APP in hippocampal neurons at 30 DIV. The patterns of colocalization are shown in the double-labeled pairs A/B, C/D, and E/F, which represent the same field stained with the APP antibody C7 (A, C, E) and clathrin heavy-chain antibody (B, D, F). Arrows indicate some sites of colocalization, in which clathrin-coated vesicles have clustered. More discrete punctate staining within the clusters can be observed in F (arrow). A growth cone (gc) is also labeled by both antibodies. Scale bars, 20 pm.

Page 8: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993. 13(7) 3119

Figure 6. Double labeling of 30 DIV hippocampal neurons with a synaptophysin antibody (A) and antibody C7 against APP (B). The antibodies do not colocalize as seen best at the sites indicated with arrows. Scale bar, 20 pm.

that these sites represented points of synaptic contact, and in- deed, clathrin-coated vesicles have been described in the region of synapses (Wong et al., 1990). However, APP did not colo- calize with synaptophysin antibodies (Fig. 6A,B). The punctate reaction product from the two antibodies were nonoverlapping, suggesting that APP localization in axons did not correspond to synaptic sites. Reports concerning processing of APP in a lysosomal compartment prompted us to stain the cells with a cathepsin D antibody. Staining with this antibody was confined to the region of the cell body (data not shown). It therefore seemed unlikely that very much of the APP in neuronal pro- cesses is in lysosomes.

Following internalization APP moves to an endosomal compartment

Clathrin-coated vesicles move their contents to an endosomal compartment from which sorting occurs to a variety of desti- nations. One possible route is the passage to late endosomes and lysosomes where degradation occurs. The experiment that provided evidence for the presence of APP in late endosomes was the pH-induced redistribution of APP-containing organ- elles. The neuronal culture was incubated in acetate Ringer’s at pH 6.90 for 15 min before fixation and immunolabeling. This procedure drives late endosomal constituents out into neuronal processes (Parton et al., 199 1). Following the pH shift, a punctate pattern of APP staining was present in all of the axons, in con- trast to the subpopulation labeled in cultures without the pH adjustment, and the staining appeared considerably more in- tense (Fig. 7). The pH-induced redistribution respected the ax-

onal compartmentation of the APP-labeled organelles since the procedure failed to drive these organelles into the dendrites.

To determine the efficacy of the acidification procedure in 30-d-old hippocampal neurons, control cells were incubated in Lucifer yellow for 30 min followed by a chase for 30 min in marker-free medium. During this time Lucifer yellow is taken up by fluid-phase endocytosis throughout the cell and carried back to the neuronal cell body destined for late endosomes. The cells were then washed in Ringer’s, pH 7.20, and reincubated in acetate Ringer’s, pH 6.90 or 7.20, for a further 15 min before fixation and immunostaining with APP antibodies. Following acidification Lucifer yellow-containing organelles, appeared in the processes and often colocalized with APP-containing or- ganelles (Fig. 7C,D). This finding suggests that one of the or- ganelles with which APP is associated in the neuronal cell body is the late endosome. This experiment also served to determine whether the shift of APP-containing organelles to the axon was a feature only of these organelles transporting APP, or whether all late endosomes segregated to the axon under the conditions of reduced cytosolic pH. Following the pH shift Lucifer yellow- labeled late endosomes were confined to the axon (Fig. 7EJ’). As expected, cultures in which the final incubation was at pH 7.2 did not show Lucifer yellow labeling in any of the processes. These results suggested that shifting the pH polarized the en- dosomes to an axonal compartment.

Use of kinesin antisense oligonucleotides

To assess the anterograde movement of APP in the cultured neurons, we utilized kinesin heavy-chain antisense oligonucleo-

Page 9: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were
Page 10: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993, 13(7) 3121

Figure 8. APP is confined to the cell body of cultured hippocampal neurons in the presence of kinesin heavy-chain antisense oligonucleotides after 1 DIV. A and C are a control cell treated with kinesin sense oligonucleotides and double labeled with tubulin antibody (A) and the APP antibody C5 (C). The arrow in C shows the typical site of APP at the growth cone. B and D are a cell treated with kinesin antisense oligonucleotides and double labeled with tubulin antibody (B) and the APP antibody C7. The arrow3 show the tip of the process with only trace labeling by C7. Scale bar, 20 pm.

tides as described previously (Ferreira et al., 1992). These an- tisense oligonucleotides are capable of suppressing kinesin heavy- chain expression and of retarding the movement of molecules associated with organelle-based rapid transport (Ferreira et al., 1992). One hour after plating the hippocampal neurons, kinesin heavy-chain antisense oligonucleotides were added to the me- dium and additional doses of the oligonucleotides were admin- istered every 12 hr. At 24 and 48 hr after plating the cells were fixed and double labeled for APP and tubulin (Fig. 8). Staining with the tubulin antibody demonstrated that the cells had de- veloped processes, albeit shorter than control sense oligonucle- otide-treated cultures; however, APP failed to enter the pro- cesses and was confined to the cell body. This appearance was very different from the normal growth cone localization of APP in hippocampal cultures at 24 hr. The inhibition of APP trans- port to the neurite tip suggested that its anterograde translo- cation is mediated by a kinesin-based motor.

Discussion Neuronal localization APP is detected most prominently in neurons, but its precise localization within neurons is not entirely clear from previous analyses of tissue sections. Dissociated neuronal cultures can sometimes reveal the localization of a protein when localization in tissue sections is problematic due to the very close apposition of neural and non-neural elements. An additional level of com- plexity in the analysis of neuronal localization is the very sig- nificant morphological changes that occur as a function of de- velopment. From the analysis of developing hippocampal cultures, it appears that APP is restricted to the advancing tip of the growth cone membrane. APP could be positioned at this site to serve a regulatory role in the control of neuronal growth. Contact is not the signal for redistribution into the axonal shaft since the more mature axonal pattern does not emerge until

t

Figure 7. Redistribution of late endosomes in hippocampal neurons following acidification of the medium. A and B are the same cell labeled with antibody C7 (A) and Lucifer yellow (B) after a 30 min incubation in Lucifer yellow and a 30 min chase. C and D are the same microscopic fields labeled with antibody C7 (C) and Lucifer yellow (0) treated with Ringer’s pH 6.90 for 15 min following the chase. Considerably more abundant punctate labeling by the APP antibody is apparent in the processes (C) that frequently colocalizes (arrows) with Lucifer yellow-labeled late endosomes (D). E and Fare the same cell labeled with the MAP2 antibody AP14 (E) and with Lucifer yellow under the same conditions as C and D. The arrows in E correspond to the dots in F, demonstrating that the pH shift redistributes the late endosomes into axons as demonstrated by their failure to label with the MAP2 antibody. Scale bars, 20 pm.

Page 11: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

3122 Ferreira et al. - Neuronal Compartments of APP

approximately 12-l 5 d after plating, whereas synapse formation begins at 5 d (Fletcher et al., 1991).

The correspondence between punctate synaptophysin staining and the presence of synapses by electron microscopy of hip- pocampal cultures was shown previously (Fletcher et al., 199 1). APP did not colocalize with these synaptic sites in 30-d-old hippocampal cultures (Fig. 6); instead, it colocalized with ve- sicular appearing clusters of clathrin-immunoreactive structures (Fig. 5). Because the staining appeared vesicular, it is likely that the clathrin-immunoreactive structures represent membrane- bound organelles with assembled clathrin triskelions. Why these organelle-like structures cluster at nonsynaptic sites is unknown.

Neuronal transport and sorting of APP

Because kinesin antisense oligonucleotides inhibited the an- terograde transport of APP, some portion of the APP found in axons utilizes the motor protein kinesin for its anterograde translocation (Fig. 8). Although the hypothetical characteristics of an APP-transporting organelle must include specific targeting to the axon, this localization cannot arise simply by the segre- gation of the APP motor. Kinesin is present in both axons and dendrites in hippocampal neurons in culture (Ferreira et al., 1992). Hooking cargo to a minus-enddirected motor has been proposed as one way to exclude organelles, such as ribosomes, from the axon (Black and Baas, 1989), but the complementary problem of a mechanism for enriching delivery to the axon of organelles such as the synaptic vesicle is unclear. The identity of the organelle carrying APP is unknown. In developing neu- rites these organelles will likely transit to the tip before their insertion into the distal membrane.

One hypothesis concerning the neuronal sorting of surface glycoproteins is that they follow pathways similar to those iden- tified in polarized epithelial cells such as MDCK cells (Dotti and Simons, 1990). The glycoprotein product from the vesicular stomatitis virus sorts to the basolateral surface of MDCK cells, and the glycoprotein product of the avian influenza fowl plague virus sorts to the apical surface of MDCK cells. These same viral glycoproteins sort preferentially to the dendrite and the axon, respectively, of polarized hippocampal neurons (Dotti and Simons, 1990). APP is the first endogenous glycoprotein in neu- rons shown to follow one limb of this hypothesized sorting schema. Since some portion of apical sorting in MDCK cells occurs via transcytosis, an analogous mechanism may operate to sort APP to the axon, where it creates a specific modification of the axonal membrane.

Although the sorting of surface glycoproteins suggested an analogy between the apical surface of MDCK cells and the axon, the response of the late endosomes to acidification of the media suggested a closer resemblance of the axon to the basolateral surface. The pH shift in neurons resulted in the movement of late endosomes to the axon and in MDCK cells to the basolateral surface; in both of these regions microtubules are aligned with their plus ends distal (Heidemann et al., 1981; Bacallao et al., 1989). The axon as a specialized cellular domain may draw upon sorting mechanisms used by both the apical and basolateral systems in order to sort different categories of organelles and their constituent proteins.

Membrane traficking of APP in neurons

The colocalization of APP with clathrin-reactive structures rais- es the possibility that APP internalization in neurons occurs via receptor-mediated endocytosis. The endocytosis of a variety of

receptors is facilitated by clathrin-mediated internalization from either the plasma membrane or the trans-Golgi membrane (for review, see Pearse and Robinson, 1990). If APP can function as a receptor on the plasma membrane, its punctate staining observed in the neuronal culture system might serve as an assay to analyze ligand-mediated internalization.

Transport studies demonstrated that clathrin heavy and light chains move anterograde in the axon with a number of cyto- skeletal proteins described as SCb or slow component b (Gamer and Lasek, 1981; Gower and Tytell, 1987). It is believed that clathrin moves anterograde unassembled, since if it were coating an organelle one would predict its presence in rapid axonal transport. When clathrin is associated with an organelle, as is suggested here, it is more likely moving in a retrograde direction.

Clathrin-coated vesicles route their contents to early endo- somes from both the plasma membrane and the trans-Golgi. The presence of APP within early endosomes of neurons has not been directly demonstrated. The next site in the intemali- zation process where it is possible to detect APP is in the late endosome positioned in the region of the neuronal cell body. The late endosome was identified here by reducing the pH of the culture medium to induce the redistribution of these organ- elles into processes (Fig. 7). While under basal conditions only a subset ofthe axons in culture have the punctate APP reactivity, the shift in the pH results in the punctate staining of nearly all axons. This observation suggests that relative to the pool of APP in clathrin-coated vesicles there is a larger pool in late endo- somes. Among the various known molecules internalized via clathrin-coated vesicles, only a subset reach the late endosome. For instance, the low-density lipoprotein receptor gets recycled to the plasma membrane while only its ligand, the low-density lipoprotein, gets degraded in the lysosome (Goldstein et al., 1979). The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, on the other hand, does get degraded in lysosomes along with EGF (Carpen- ter and Cohen, 1979). Like the EGF receptor, APP spans the membrane one time and has a cysteine-rich amino terminus; the secreted form of APP, protease nexin II, can form complexes with EGF-binding protein, a pro-EGF-processing serine ester- ase (reviewed in Monard, 1988). Unlike EGF, if APP does func- tion as a receptor it does not transduce its signal by serving as a kinase. Nevertheless, the presence of APP in late endosomes suggests that in neurons most of the APP is degraded rather than cycled back to the plasma membrane since the late en- dosomal compartment contains very low amounts of recycled molecules (Geuze et al., 1983; Schmid et al., 1988).

Finally, perhaps there is some similarity between APP inter- nalization and the way in which polymeric immunoglobulin A is internalized on the basolateral surface of some epithelial cells. In this case a protein fragment is transcytosed to the apical domain and secreted (reviewed in Mostov and Simister, 1985). Indeed, there are cleaved forms of APP that are secreted and the segregation of glycoproteins to the axon may occur transcy- totically (Dotti and Simons, 1990). It will be crucial to learn whether APP is present in its full-length form or as a fragment in the various neuronal compartments found here.

References Bacallao R, Antony C, Dotti C, Karsenti E, Stelzer EHK, Simons K

(1989) The subcellular organization of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells during the formation of a polarized epithelium. J Cell Biol 109: 28 17-2832.

Bahmanyar S, Higgins GA, Goldgaber D, Lewis DA, Morrison JH, Wilson MC, Shanker SK, Gajdusek DC (1988) Localization of am-

Page 12: lntraneuronal Compartments of the Amyloid Precursor Protein · 2003-09-16 · damine at a dilution of I : IO0 (Boehrinaer). For double-labeling 1 1 excer- iments two antibodies were

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1993. 73(7) 3123

yloid p protein messenger RNA in brains from patients with Alzhei- mer’s disease. Science 237~77-80.

Bartlett WP, Banker GA (1984) Electron microscopic studies of axonal and dendritic development by hippocampal neurons in culture. I. Cells which develop without intercellular contacts. J Neurosci 4: 1944- 1953.

Bendotti C, Forloni GL, Morgan RA, O’Hara BF, Oster-Granite ML, Reeves RH, Gearhart JD, Coyle JT (1988) Neuroanatomical lo- calization and quantification of amyloid precursor protein mRNA by in situ hybridization in the brains of normal aneuploid and lesioned mice. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 85:3628-3632.

Black MM, Baas P W (1989) The basis of polarity in neurons. Trends Neurosci 12:211-214.

Bloom SW, Fields KL, Yen SH, Haver H, Schook W, Puszkin S (1980) Brain clathrin: immunofluorescent patterns in cultured cells and tis- sues. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 775520-5524.

Bottenstein JE. Sato GH (1979) Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 76:514-517. - -

Brodsky F (1985) Clathrin structure characterized with monoclonal antibodies. I. Analvsis of multiule antinenic sites. J Cell Biol 101: 2047-2054. .

Card JP, Meade RP, Davis LG (1988) Immunocytochemical local- ization of the precursor protein for P-amyloid in the rat central ner- vous system. Neuron 1:835-846.

Carpenter G, Cohen S (1979) Epidermal growth factor. Annu Rev Biochem 48: 193-2 16.

Catterucia N, Willingale-Theune J, Bunke D, Prior R, Master CL, Cri- santi A, Beyreuther K (1990) Ultrastructural localization of the putative precursors of the A4 amyloid protein associated with Alzhei- mer’s disease. Am J Path01 137: 19-26.

Cohen ML, Golde TE, Usiak MF, Younkin LH, Younkin SG (1988) In situ hybridization of nucleus basalis neurons shows increased P-a- myloid mRNA in Alzheimer disease. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 85: 1227-1231.

Dotti CG, Simons K (1990) Polarized sorting of viral glycoproteins to the axon and dendrites of hippocampal neurons in culture. Cell 62163-72.

Estus S, Golde TE, Kunishita T, Blades D, Lowery D, Eisen M, Usiak M, Qu X, Tabira T, Greenberg BD, Younkin SG (1992) Potentially amyloidogenic, carboxyl-terminal derivatives of the amyloid protein precursor. Science 255~726-728.

Ferreira A, Niclas J, Vale RD, Banker G, Kosik KS (1992) Suppression of kinesin expression in cultured hippocampal neurons using antisense oligonucleotides. J Cell Biol 117:595-606.

Fletcher TL, Cameron P, DeCamilli P, Banker G (199 1) The distri- bution of synapsin I and synaptophysin in hippocampal neurons de- veloping in culture. J Neurosci 11: 16 17-1626.

Gamer JA, Lasek RJ (198 1) Clathrin is axonally transported as part of slow component b: the microfilament complex. J Cell Biol88: 172- 178.

Geuze HJ, Slot JW, Strous GJ, Lodish HF, Schwartz AL (1983) In- tracellular site of asialoglycoprotein receptor-ligand uncoupling: dou- ble label immunoelectron microscopy during receptor mediated en- docytosis. Cell 32:277-287.

Golde TE, Estus S, Younkin LH, Selkoe DJ, Younkin SC (1992) Pro- cessing of the amyloid precursor to potentially amyloidogenic deriv- atives. Science 255:728-730.

Goldstein JL, Anderson GW, Brown MS (1979) Coated pits, coated vesicles and receptor-mediated endocvtosis. Nature 279:679-685.

Griffiths G, Simons K (1986) The trans Golgi network: sorting at the exit site of the Golgi complex. Science 234:438443.

Haass N, Koo EH, Mellon A, Hung AY, Selkoe DJ (1992) Targeting of cell-surface fl-amyloid precursor protein to lysosomes: alternative processing into amyloid-bearing fragments. Nature 357:500-503.

Hass C, Hung A, Selkoe DJ (199 1) Processing of fi-amyloid precursor protein in microglia and astrocytes favors an internal localization over constitutive secretion. J Neurosci 11:3783-3793.

Heidemann SR, Landers JM, Hamborg MA (198 1) Polarity orien- tation of axonal microtubules. J Cell Biol 9 1:66 l-665.

Heuser J (1989) Changes in lysosome shape and distribution correlated with changes in cytoplasmic pH. J Cell Biol 108:855-864.

Hughson E, Wandinger-Ness A, Gausepohl H, Griffiths G, Simons K (1988) The cell biolonv of envelooed virus infection of eoithelial tissues. In: Centenary &mposium of the Pasteur Institute, The mo- lecular biology of infectious diseases (Schwartz M, ed), pp 75-89. Paris: Elsevier.

Kang J, Lemaire HG, Unterbeck A, Salbaum JM, Masters CL, Gaze- schik K-H, Multhaup G, Beyreuther K, Muller-Hill B (1987) The precursor of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 protein resembles a cell- surface receptor. Nature 325:733-736.

Koo EH, Sisodia SS, Archer DR, Martin LJ, Weidemann A, Beyreuther K, Fischer P, Masters CL, Price DL (1990) Precursor of amyloid protein in Alzheimer disease undergoes fast anterograde axonal trans- port. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 87:1561-1565.

Kosik KS (1992) Alzheimer’s disease from a cell biological perspec- tive. Science 256~780-783.

Monard D (1988) Cell-derived proteases and protease inhibitors as regulators of neurite outgrow&Trends Neurosci 11:541-544.

Mostov KE, Simister NE (1985) Transcvtosis. Cell 43:389-390 Parton RG,‘Dotti CG, Bacallao R, Kurtz I, Simons K, Prydz K (199 1)

pH-induced microtubule-dependent redistribution of late endosomes in neuronal and epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 113:26 l-274.

Pearse BMF, Robinson MS (1990) Clathrin. adautors. and sortine. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:151-171. ’

I s I

Schmid SL, Fuchs R, Male P, Mellman I (1988) Two distinct sub- populations of endosomes involved in membrane recycling and trans- port to lysosomes. Cell 52:73-83.

Schubert W, Prior R, Weidemann A, Dircken H, Multhaup G, Masters CL, Beyreuther K (1991) Localization of Alzheimer beta-A4 am- yloid precursor protein at central and peripheral sites. Brain Res 563: 184-194.

Selkoe DJ, Berman-Podlisny M, Joachim CL, Vickers EA, Lee G, Fritz LC, OldersdorfT (1988) B-Amvloid orecursor orotein of Alzheimer disease occurs as 11 O-1 35 kilodalton-membrane-associated protein in neural and nonneural tissue. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 85:7341- 7345.

Shivers BD, Hilbich C, Multhaup G, Salbaum M, Beyreuther K, Seeburg P (1988) Alzheimer’s disease amyloidogenic glycoprotein: expres- sion pattern in rat brain suggests a role in cell contact. EMBO J 7:1365-1370.

Van Nostrand WE, Cunningham DD (1987) Purification of protease nexin II from human libroblasts. J Biol Chem 18:8508-85 14.

Weidemann A, Konig G, Bunke D, Fischer P, Salbaum JM, Masters CL, Beyreuther K (1989) Identification, biogenesis, localization of precursors of Alzheimer’s disease A4 amyloid protein. Cell 57: 115- 126.

Wong DH, Ignatius MJ, Parosky G, Parham P, Troianowski JO. Brod- sky FM (1990) Neuron-specific expression of high-moleculariweight clathrin liaht chain. J Neurosci 10:3025-303 1.

Gower DJ, Tytell M (1987) Axonal transport of clathrin-associated proteins. Brain Res 407: l-8.