Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) 3.0 – Annual Review
APRIL 11, 2016
Agenda Welcome/Introductions
LCAP in Context ◦ State Budget Process ◦ LCFF ◦ District Data ◦ LCAP
◦ LCAP 3.0 Budget Review Draft ◦ County Recommendations and Revisions ◦ Stakeholder Engagement – Feedback on LCAP 3.0
2015-16 LCAP Annual Update ◦ Timeline
2015-16 Revised LCAP
SECTION 2: GOALS, ACTIONS, EXPENDITURES, AND PROGRESS INDICATORS
SECTION 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
SECTION 3: USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT FUNDS AND PROPORTIONALITY
ANNUAL UPDATE
4
8 State Priorities and Related Data Elements Needs Assessment Goals Resource Alignment Services Outcomes
P4- Pupil Achievement A. Performance on
assessments B. Academic Performance
Index C. College and Career
Readiness D. English learners becoming
reclassified and proficient E. English learners being
reclassified F. Advanced Placement
Exams passage G. Prepared through Early
Assessment Program
P1- Basic Services A. Rate of teacher mis-assignments B. Student Access to standards-
aligned instructional resources and materials
C. Facilities
P7- Course Access A. Student access and enrollment in courses
of study B. Programs for Unduplicated Pupils C. Programs for Individuals with exceptional
needs
P5- Pupil Engagement A. School attendance
rates B. Chronic
absenteeism rates C. Middle School
dropout rates D. High School
dropout rates E. High School
graduation rates
P6- School Climate A. Student suspension rates B. Student expulsion rates C. Other local measures
P2- Implementation of CCSS A. CCSS
implementation results for all students
B. CCSS & ELD for English learners
P3- Parental Involvement A. Efforts to seek parent input B. Promotion of parental participation
and leadership C. Parental participation of individuals
with exceptional needs
P8- Other Student Outcomes A. Other indicators of student
performance in courses of study. May include performance and other exams.
District Plans in the Common Core, LCFF, and LCAP Era
2013 Strategic Plan
2014 LCAP 1.0
2015 LCAP 2.0
2016 LCAP 3.0
LCFF & MYP Challenges Facing LUSD
Constant State of Change ◦ Student Population Growth ◦ Operational Costs of New Schools every 3 to 4 years ◦ State Instructional Materials Funds folded into LCFF ◦ Developing a Complete High School Program ◦ CCSS & Professional Development ◦ Evolution to 21st Century Classrooms ◦ Program Needs of Students ◦ Desires of Community ◦ Technology & Technology Infrastructure ◦ Long Term Impact of Great Recession on Education ◦ Unfunded Mandates from State ◦ Special Education Contribution
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17LUSD Rapid Growth 4 4 6 6 6
4 4
6 6 6
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5Sc
hool
s
LUSD Rapid Growth
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17LUSD Rapid Growth 91 109 168 185 200
91 109
168 185
200
0
50
100
150
200
250
Teac
hers
LUSD Rapid Growth
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17LUSD Rapid Growth 2428 2736 3568 4059 4500
2428 2736
3568
4059
4500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Stud
ent E
nrol
lmen
t
LUSD Rapid Growth
Distribution of LCFF in LUSD
Certificated
Classified
Benefits
Classroom Materials
Operating Costs
Certificated
Classified
Benefits
Classroom Materials
LCFF District in a Typical Year
Operating Costs
LCFF When Opening A School
LCFF relationship to LCAP & Strategic Plan
Measuring District and Program Effectiveness ◦ State Priorities ◦ Five Areas of Concentration w/in Strategic Plan ◦ Progress Monitoring of Programs ◦ Program Sustainability, Long Term Planning ◦ Necessity of Programs Not Currently in Existence ◦ Communication and Feedback ◦ Budget Limitations
Student Programs Considered for Expansion
Music and Art
Advanced and Enrichment Opportunities (GATE)
College Preparedness/Career Opportunities
Technology and Tech Enhanced Classrooms
Extra-Curricular Experiences K-12
Highest Test Scores in the Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ELA Math
Percent Meeting Standard or Exceeding the Standard
Lammersville Jefferson Livermore Tracy Manteca Ripon Lincoln
State and County CAASPP Comparisons
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ELA Math
Percent Meeting or Exceeding the standard
Lammersville USD State County
State and County CAASPP Comparison Science
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
5th 8th 10th
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
Lammersville State County
CAASPP Claim Data
ELA – ABOVE, AT OR NEAR
74% Reading
81% Writing
86% Speaking and listening
84% Research and inquiry
MATH – ABOVE, AT OR NEAR
70% concepts and procedures
77% Problem solving, modeling/data analysis
79% Communicating reasoning
Focus Areas Achievement Gap in LUSD ◦ Students from non-college educated families ◦ Low Income, English Learners, Hispanic, African American, & SPED ◦ Data Contradictions- Focus area subgroups out perform same subgroups in
SJ County
Communication to Community 2014 to Present
LCFF Funding: How Money is Distributed
LCFF State Priorities: Why Manner the Money Distributed
Baseline Data: CAASPP & MAP
LCAP: Goals, Identified Needs, Annual Measureable Outcomes
LCAP Goal Areas Student Achievement
District Culture and Leadership
Fiscal Strength
Parent & Community Relationships
21st Century Skills/College & Career Ready
DAC: Revised LCAP How have the regulations/expectations changed? ◦ Revised / New Expectations ◦ Identified Need – No Data Points ◦ Expected Measurable Outcomes
◦ Less Information ◦ Aligned with 8 State Priorities and Sub Data Elements
Stakeholder Engagement in District Programs District Level 1. Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Team Meetings- 9/2, 10/12, 11/3, 12/2, 1/6, 2/3, 3/2,
4/6 2. Curriculum Committee Meetings and Trainings- 12/7, 1/25, 2/3, 2/5, 2/11, 2/16, 2/17, 2/18, 2/24,
2/25, 3/2, 3/8, 3/9, 3/22, 3/24, 4/6, 4/7 3. Bargaining Team Meetings (LTA and CSEA)- Every 4-8 weeks 4. Administrators and Staff Meetings- September 2015-May 2016 5. DAC Meeting at District Office- 2/29, 4/11 6. GATE, Arts & Music Com Meetings- 11/3, 12/8, 2/9, 3/3 7. DELAC Meeting at School Sites- 9/30, 11/18, 1/27, 3/9, 4/6 8. Parents- Common Core Math Workshops - 12/2, 12/3, 12/7 & 12/8/2015 9. New ELA/ELD Curriculum Adoption Meeting for Parents- 2/25/2016 10. Parent Canvas Training 9/16 and 9/22/2015
Site Level 11. Monthly Leadership (PAC) Meetings at school sites 12. Altamont School: Staff- 3/8. PTA- 3/15, SSC- 3/22, ASB- 13. Bethany School: Staff- 3/11, 3/18; SSC- , BSF- ASB- 4/11 14. Lammersville School: Staff- 3/11, LSF- 3/14, SSC- 4/7 15. Mountain House High School: Staff- 3/23; PTA– 3/10; SSC, ASB- 31/5 16. Questa School: Staff- 3/11; QSF- SSC- 3/22, ASB- , 17. Wicklund School: Staff- 3/11 WSF; SSC ; 3/22, ASB,
LCAP 3.0 Budget Review Draft Student Achievement ◦ Curriculum Adoption
◦ ELA/ELD 2015/2016 ◦ Math 2016
District Culture and Leadership ◦ Professional Development
◦ Common Core ◦ ELA/ELD ◦ Math ◦ Next Generation Science Standards ◦ Blended Learning ◦ Special Education
LCAP 3.0 Budget Review Draft Fiscal Strength ◦ MYP ◦ Technology Sustainability Plan ◦ Staffing
Parent and Community Relations ◦ After School Programs ◦ Increase Music Access ◦ GATE Identification/Advance and Enrichment ◦ Career Technical Education ◦ Grant Writing
LCAP 3.0 Budget Review Draft 21st Century Skills/College and Career Ready ◦ 1:1 By 2018 – 1:1 Grades 7-12
◦ 1:1 4-6 Grades ◦ 3:1 TK-3 Grades: Small Pilot TK/1 Tablets ◦ PLTW ◦ Career Pathway Articulation
◦ 21st Century Classroom Project ◦ Defining 21st Century Classrooms in LUSD (Handout)
ELA/ELD Curriculum Adoption Meeting for Parents
LCAP Curriculum for K-8 Grade Level
1. ELA and Math
2. ELA/ELD Framework training for teachers
3. Staff members and parents reviewed ELA materials
4. Currently piloting ELA Curriculum
5. Will explore math curriculum
LCAP- Professional Development
1. ELA, ELD, math, and Next Generation Science Standards and instructional strategies
2. New Teacher Academy, mentorship, and BTSA
3. PD for Special Education Teachers
4. Classified Staff- PD twice annually
Teachers Receiving Professional Development on the New ELA/ELD Curriculum
LCAP and Technology - 21st Century Classrooms and New Curriculum 1. More technology in the classrooms to
implement CCSS for new curriculum.
2. 21st Century Classrooms- Blended Learning Academy- Surface computers for participants
3. More technology for specific Career Pathways
4. IPADs Survey for TK-1 Grade Teachers- 25% interested
LCAP and Staffing Program Support Staff
1. Instructional Coordinators
2. Special Education Coordinator.
3. Alternative Education Program and Coordinator
4. Music Teacher
LCAP Programs
1. After school programs such as drama and other extra-curricular activities.
2. Consistent music programs across the school district for K-8 students
3. Grant Writing Committee
4. GATE Program Testing and Go Quest
5. CTE Survey and PLTW Programs
LUSD Budget Review Public Budget Review ◦ Entire District Budget Available to Public – June 8, 2016 ◦ Including Items Identified in LCAP
◦ District Budget Public Hearing – June 13, 2016 ◦ LCAP Board Approval – June 15, 2016
SJCOE Feedback Style versus Substance ◦ Less Words, More Focus ◦ More Targeted Data to State Priorities
Style Change Does Not Impact Substance of LCAP 2.0
Budget Detail and Information in LCAP Review
Example 2014-15 Identified Need for Goal 1
Student Achievement: Common Core based, grade level Units of Study must be developed to drive student learning and instructional strategies to effectively transition to the Common Core. Units need to be developed based on Essential Questions, lessons created based on identified priority and secondary standards, student learning measured by pre and post assessments, and strategic support opportunities provided based on RTI and driven by technology. Units must include Response to Intervention supported strategies to ensure that all students receive strategic support and that all teachers are aware through data the impact of their instruction on each individual student. Classroom environments must be supportive, safe, designed for 21st Century learning, and inclusive of technology. Currently, student progress is measured by using Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) for K-8 students which was 70% of students meeting their growth goal; high school students D and/or F rate which was 35%; CAHSEE Pass Rate Data which was 92% ELA and 89% Math; English Learner (ELL) reclassification rate through AMAO2 which was 29%; student attendance rate which was 97.4%, middle school dropout which were six students in 2013-14, and 12 students with chronic absenteeism. No high school dropout rate and graduation rate will be available until 2016-17 because first 12th grade class will start in 2015-16. No baseline data is available for CAASPP Interim Assessment, pre and post assessments, Early College Program at Delta College, and Project Lead the Way as these programs are new to our school district. 100% of the teachers are appropriately credentialed per Williams Act report and all staff is appropriately assigned. Stakeholders used these metrics and data points to identify these needs and measure student progress. 100% of the students have access to adequate instructional materials per Williams Act report.
Example 2015-16 Identified Need for Goal 1
Student Achievement: Through Stakeholder Engagement and the review of programs, services and data, the following needs were identified:
Common Core State Standards Implementation through K-8 English Language Arts ELA)/English Language Development (ELD) curriculum adoption, grade level Units of Study for Math, and subject specific Units of Study for 9-12th grade students to drive student learning and provide strategic support to meet students’ academic needs Classrooms that provide a safe and supportive learning environment
21st Century Classrooms with digital tools and adequate instructional materials to provide a Blended Learning experience to the students
Access to Early College, Advanced Classes, and Career Pathway Programs to prepare students for Careers and Colleges.
LUSD LCAP Adoption Develop LCAP
Proposed Plan (Dec 2015-Feb 2016)
Input from Stakeholders via surveys & Meetings
(Feb-May 2016)
Changes and Approvals March-
June 2016
Public Hearing- June 13, 2016
Board Approval- June 15, 2016
Submit to SJCOE- June 2016