Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tuesday 8th November, 8:30am – 1:00pm
Broadway House Conference Centre
Network: Broadway House
Passcode: enjoyBH1!
Agenda Time Topic Lead
8.30 Registration All
9.00 Welcome and Introduction Nick Losseff -Clinical Network Director
Neuroscience
9.15 The Right Care Approach Steve Sparks- Right Care Delivery Partner
9.35 Presentation of Right Care data on
common neurological conditions
Steve Sparks & Mary O’Brien Right Care
Delivery Partners
10.45 Break All
11.15 Solutions:
Enhanced acute neurology service
(EANS)
Community neurology service
Adapting existing service models for
neurological conditions.
Nick Losseff
Dominic Heaney (UCLH)
Jacqui Wakefield (kings) Catherine Atkinson
(Royal Free)
12.30 Summary and questions All
13.00 Close
Right care for neurologic conditions
Dr Nick Losseff
London Neuroscience Clinical Network
November 2016
4
London neuro-context
252,000 people living with a neurological condition in London (excludes migraine
1.7 million) :
33% of the neurology programme budget is spent on unplanned secondary care.
More than half (64%) of neurology admissions to hospital were on an emergency
basis. Neurological conditions account for 17% of all emergency admissions.
London has the highest rate of neurology outpatient consultant appointments
Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOC) in acute hospitals due to waits in accessing
inpatient neuro-rehabilitation.
National Audit Office 2011 – neurology
program budget
• £3 billion + same again in care
• 6 recommendations to improve services
• Mixed progress
5
NAO recommendations
• Appoint NCD / establish clinical network
• Establish data set and quality outcomes
• Appropriate access to services driven though
commissioning outcomes framework / mandated joint
health and care commissioning
6
Problems
• Invisible and apologetic
• No National Strategy
• Commissioning responsibilities inexplicit
• No outcome indicators at CCG level to deliver against
• Hindered by the complexity we have created
7
Progress
• Data
• Right care
• PHE - Fingertips
8
9
Camden / Doncaster CCG (outpatient)
Public Health England – Fingertips Neurological Conditions
10
Camden / Doncaster CCG
(unplanned admissions)
11
Neurology in London Clinical Network Agenda
Developed from consultation and existing priorities
• Common Conditions
• Integrated Care
• Acute Neurology
• Commissioner engagement
12
Redressing the balance
• Out of kilter system
• Moving the expertise to the right place / right time
• Modernising archaic working practices
13
Familiar pattern (e.g. migraine)
• Attendance at GP / A+E
• Often unable to secure responsive assessment by someone
competent
• Admission – CT – LP
• Outcome – a worse headache
14
Partly because …..
• Neurology expertise bogged down in one in one out outpatients
• Not at the front door
• Not in the community
15
Morning summary
• Discuss right care approach
• Data and interpretation
• Solutions
• Common Conditions
• Integrated Care
• Acute Neurology
The NHS RightCare Approach
Steve Sparks, Mary O’Brien
Right Care Delivery Partner 8th November 2016
17
What is RightCare?
NHS RightCare is a programme committed to reducing unwarranted variation to
improve people’s health and outcomes. It ensures that the right person has the right
care, in the right place, at the right time, making the best use of available resources.
NHS RightCare ensures local health economies…..
•make the best use of resources to give better value – better value for patients, the
population and the tax payer.
•understand how they are doing – by identifying variation with demographically
similar populations
•get talking about the same stuff - about population healthcare rather than
organisations
•focus on the areas of greatest opportunity by identifying priority programmes
which offer the best opportunities to improve healthcare for populations
•use tried and tested processes to make sustainable change to care pathways to
reduce unwarranted variation
18
NHS Right Care Principles
19
20
Commissioning for Value Focus Packs
Covering Neurology
• Neurological conditions covered over 3 RightCare focus packs:
• Neurological – major neuromuscular conditions and sudden onset (see stroke), progressive (note dementia), chronic pain
• Mental Health – Dementia
• CVD – Stroke
• All packs provide detail on elective and NEL admissions, LOS, procedures, primary care prescribing
• 26 (out of 65) wave 1 CCGs focussing on neurology in their first cycle of improvement
26
27
• The NHS RightCare team supports local health economies adopt
the NHS RightCare approach as ‘the way we do things around
here.’
• The proven three-phase process provides a more systematic,
evidence-based methodology to service redesign and
prioritisation.
• It is helping many health economies make sustainable change
to improve their population’s health whilst making the best
investment decisions.
28
RightCare wave 1 CCGs in London
29
Our offer to local health economies and national
programmes
• Expertise to support health economies gather and use data to highlight and explain
unwarranted variation, giving you a starting point for transforming the way care is
delivered for patients and populations.
• A range of comprehensive data packs, specific to each health economy, that act as a
source of insight to identify priority areas that offer the best opportunities to improve
healthcare for populations and increase value.
• Access to online tools and optimal value pathways to support the case for change and
evaluate progress.
• Support to interpret intelligence developed by NHS RightCare and from other
sources.
• Access to best practice, real life examples and learning from other health economies
where the RightCare Approach has been adopted.
30
We ask you to:
• Use intelligence to start and drive discussions about how you can improve value, in
particular the data packs provided by NHS RightCare.
• Appreciate that the NHS RightCare data pack data is indicative - a starting point for
action and to stimulate further data analysis.
• Use your local resources, including Commissioning Support Organisations, to delve
further into the intelligence to triangulate with other data sources.
• Proactively work with your local Delivery Partner to understand your health economy’s
data, seeking advice when needed.
• Use the data and tools available, alongside your local insight, to ensure decision-
making and change is based on the right intelligence and with the right buy in.
Neurology in London
A summary of commissioning for value
data
• Person centred service
• Prompt diagnosis, appropriate referral & treatment
• Rehabilitation, adjustment and social integration
• Lifelong care and support for people with long term neurological
conditions, families and carers
DH, 2005. The National Service Framework for Long term Conditions
32
What should good care for neurological
conditions look like?
33
Demographic Summary
Tower Hamlets
City&Hackney
Barking& Dagenham
34
Richmond
Kingston
Overall London has a young age profile… Only a small proportion of its
GP registered population are 75+
Tower Hamlets
Newham
City&Hackney
Islington
Southwark
Lambeth
Wandsworth
35
But for those that are over 75+ there are higher levels of deprivation
compared to other parts of the country
Tower Hamlets
Newham
City&Hackney
Islington
Southwark
Lambeth
Haringey
Specialist provision in London
• Total neurology programme budget spend in London is
£107M
• In London 44,005 patients were admitted to hospital with a
neurological condition in the Neurology Programme
Budget Category who were not cared for by Neurologists.
The total spend for these patients is £82.5m
• The total spend for patients with neurological conditions
cared for by Neurologists is £25.4m
• 30% of spend is covered by consultants within General
Medicine or A&E
Summary Neurology Spend Data
38
Breakdown of highest spending
neurology diagnoses (of £107m total)
Diagnosis Total Spend
R296: Tendency to fall, not elsewhere classified £19.6m
R55X: Syncope and collapse £8.5m
R410: Disorientation, unspecified £5.6m
G35X: Multiple sclerosis £5.4m
G560: Carpal tunnel syndrome £4.6m
R568: Other and unspecified convulsions £4.3m
R42X: Dizziness and giddiness £3.7m
G409: Epilepsy, unspecified £3.4m
R268: Other and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility £2.9m
G20X: Parkinson's disease £2.4m
R298: Other and unspecified symptoms and signs involving the nervous and musculoskeletal systems £2.1m
G403: Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes £2.0m
G459: Transient cerebral ischaemic attack, unspecified £1.7m
G439: Migraine, unspecified £1.6m
G931: Anoxic brain damage, not elsewhere classified £1.1m
G932: Benign intracranial hypertension £0.89m
G819: Hemiplegia, unspecified £0.88m
G249: Dystonia, unspecified £0.87m
G122: Motor neuron disease £0.84m
G401: Localization-related (focal)(partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple partial seizures £0.72m
Diagnosis highlighted in yellow are included in Public Health England’s “Defining adult
neurological conditions” briefing document
Hounslow
Sutton
Tower Hamlets
Kingston
Merton
Camden
Barking
Westminster
Bromley
Redbridge
40 England average
Neurology spend only includes programme budget category
Neurological problems (7X). Chronic pain is not included.
Bromley
Islington
Haringey
Sutton
Ealing
Lewisham
Newham
Barking and
Dagenham
Redbridge Tower
Hamlets
Westminster
City and Hackney
41
Tower Hamlets
Hounslow
Sutton
Hammersmith
City and Hackney
Greenwich
Waltham Forest
Kingston
Bromley
Wandsworth
Merton
Camden
Richmond
42
43
Proportion of neurological elective spend by
common conditions
44
Proportion of neurological elective spend by long
term conditions
45
Proportion of neurological elective spend by
other conditions
46
Proportion of neurological non-elective spend by
common conditions
47
Proportion of neurological non-elective spend by
long term conditions
48
Proportion of neurological non-elective spend by
other conditions
There is very little direct
correlation between a
CCG’s spend on elective
admissions and their
spend on non-elective
admissions
49
Neurology Elective vs Non-Elective
Spend
You would perhaps expect to see a negative correlation- if they spend less on elective
then they would spend more on non-elective and vice versa
The London CCGs seem to have a lower elective spend compared to all CCGs, irrelevant
of non-elective spend
• Highest spend excluding falls/dizziness; MS, Carpal Tunnel & Epilepsy
• Approx 40% variation in rate of total neurology spend per 1,000 population across London
• London % elective spend on neurology overall is slightly lower/roughly in line with England average (exception is epilepsy), in line with England average for NEL spend
• No correlation between elective and NEL spend
50
Spend - Summary
51
Common Conditions
Epilepsy
52
….But many CCGs have a high spend rate for elective admissions – all
but a handful spend above the national average
Lewisham
Bexley
Greenwich
Bromley
Lambeth Merton
Ealing
53
54
All London Boroughs have a low recorded prevalence of Epilepsy –
lower than the national average
Westminster
Tower Hamlets
Camden
West London
Newham
Wandsworth
City & Hackney
Lambeth
Sutton
Bexley
55
Virtually all London CCGs spend less than the national average on
emergency admissions. Does this link to low recorded prevalence
rates?
Islington
Sutton
Croydon
Kingston
Bromley
Bexley
Southwark
Richmond
Redbridge
56
London has lots of people admitted for EEG procedures
Lewisham
Bexley
Greenwich
Bromley
Southwark
Lambeth
Sutton
Croydon
57
These rates only
cover inpatient
EEGs
However, London doesn’t typically have better seizure free rates
Richmond
Kingston
Havering
Bexley Tower Hamlets
Islington
58
Spend on hospital admissions for EEGs
by Provider
Provider Name Total Spend Number of admissions
for EEGs
RJ1: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust £830,000 363
RRV: University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust £510,000 242
RJZ: King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust £490,000 208
RP4: Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust
£230,000 98
RJ7: St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust £130,000 58
RYJ: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust £120,000 52
R1H: Barts Health NHS Trust £100,000 41
RF4: Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
£70,000 25
RQM: Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust £40,000 20
RVR: Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust £30,000 *
RAL: Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust <£5,000 *
RV8: North West London Hospitals NHS Trust <£5,000 *
RHQ: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust <£5,000 *
RJ2: Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust <£5,000 *
∗ Admissions less than or equal to 5
Note that
there is a
children’s
epilepsy unit
at Guy’s and
Thomas’
60
Epilepsy elective admissions (not including day cases) by
length of stay and activity
CCG Name Length of Stay Activity Average LOS Sutton 254 22 11.55
Enfield 202 18 11.22
Barnet 306 33 9.27
Harrow 177 21 8.43
Waltham Forest 294 36 8.17
Kingston 114 18 6.33
Croydon 264 46 5.74
Havering 172 31 5.55
Haringey 186 36 5.17
Hounslow 188 38 4.95
Redbridge 85 18 4.72
Newham 131 28 4.68
Hillingdon 167 38 4.39
Central London (Westminster) 81 19 4.26 Brent 144 35 4.11
West London 96 24 4.00
Hammersmith and Fulham 72 18 4.00
Islington 124 32 3.88
Barking and Dagenham 78 21 3.71
Richmond 63 17 3.71
Ealing 89 27 3.30
City and Hackney 97 30 3.23
Lewisham 126 40 3.15
Bromley 147 52 2.83
Bexley 96 35 2.74
Greenwich 126 47 2.68
Tower Hamlets 80 30 2.67 Southwark 62 29 2.14
Lambeth 86 41 2.10
Merton 16 8 2.00
Camden 70 41 1.71
Wandsworth 44 28 1.57
* Excluded admissions where length of stay is more than 6 months.
Lambeth has the
second highest at
2.73
Lewisham has the
highest LOS for
emergency
admissions at 3.05
61
Average length of stay after an emergency
admission for epilepsy by Provider
* Providers with admissions less than or equal to 5 have been excluded
Epilepsy - Rate of emergency admissions where
patients stayed in hospital for 0 or 1 day and had
no procedure (per 100,000 population) – 2014/15
This is consistent
with generally low
emergency
admission rates in
London
Epilepsy - Rate of elective admissions where
patients stayed in hospital for 2 or more days and
had a procedure (per 100,000 population) – 2014/15
Southwark has the
lowest proportion at
6.98%, and Ealing
has the second
lowest at 7.2%
65
66
Average length of stay after an emergency admission for epilepsy
where patients had CT head scan (by Provider)
* Providers with admissions less than or equal to 5 have been excluded .
• Low recorded prevalence
• Higher than England average elective spend and EEG rate, but seizure free around England average
• Variance in LOS
• Elective
• Short stay emergency admissions with no intervention = appropriate admissions criteria?
• Longer stay emergency admissions with intervention = appropriate admissions criteria?
• Variance in management by Consultant Neurologist
67
Epilepsy - Summary
Migraine and Headaches
68
Islington has the
highest elective
spend at £392 per
1000 pop Hammersmith has
the second highest
at £367 per 1000
pop
69
Hounslow has the
second highest at
1006 per 1000 pop
Sutton has the
highest non-elective
spend at 1026 per
1000 pop
70
Hammersmith and
Fulham has the
second highest at
45 per 100,000 pop
Islington has the
highest number of
day cases at 46 per
100,000 pop
71
• Non elective spend significantly below England average
• Higher rate of day case admissions
72
73
Long term conditions
Parkinson's disease
74
Hounslow has the
highest spend on
elective admissions
at £864 per 1000
pop
Ealing has the
second highest
spend at £751 per
1000 pop
75
Tower Hamlets has
the second highest
at £651 per 1000
pop
Enfield has the
highest non-elective
spend at £675 per
1000 pop
76
Ealing has the
second highest at
51 per 100,000 pop
Hounslow has the
highest admissions
at 74 per 100,000
pop
77
CCG Name Length of Stay Activity Average LOS Bexley 394 18 22 Camden 262 12 22 Kingston 254 12 21 Hounslow 399 20 20 Enfield 705 42 17 Hillingdon 523 32 16 Ealing 520 33 16 Bromley 596 39 15 Greenwich 310 21 15 Brent 371 26 14 Lambeth 524 40 13 Lewisham 350 27 13 Newham 293 23 13 Croydon 535 42 13 Havering 464 38 12 West London 229 19 12 Wandsworth 257 23 11 Harrow 185 17 11 Redbridge 183 17 11 City and Hackney 182 17 11 Southwark 132 13 10 Merton 101 11 9 Waltham Forest 237 26 9 Barnet 225 25 9 Central London (Westminster) 145 17 9
Hammersmith and Fulham 110 13 8
Haringey 177 21 8 Sutton 114 18 6 Islington 72 12 6 Richmond 173 29 6 Barking and Dagenham 89 17 5 Tower Hamlets 78 25 3
78
Parkinsonism and other extrapyramidal emergency
admissions by length of stay and activity
* Excluded admissions where length of stay is more than 6 months.
• Elective and day case spend is higher than England average
with wide pan London variation
• Non elective spend at average level for England with wide pan
London variation
• No CCG has more than 43 non elective admissions
• Bed use for non elective varies between 0.2 (Islington) and 1.9
(Enfield)
79
Parkinson’s summary
Neuromuscular diseases
80
Harrow has the
highest elective
spend at £335 per
1000 pop Havering has the
second highest at
£293 per 1000 pop
81
Greenwich and City
and Hackney have
the highest non-
elective spend at
£393 per 1000 pop
82
Bexley has the
highest number of
day case
admissions at 27
per 100,000 pop
Bromley has the
second highest at
26 per 100,000 pop
83
Greenwich has the
highest number of
bed days at 23
Hillingdon has the
second highest at
20
84
• Day case admissions higher than England average
85
Neuromuscular summary
Motor Neurone Disease
86
Kingston has the
highest spend at
£221 per 1000
pop, and West
London has the
second highest at
£140 per 1000 pop
87
Hammersmith and
Fulham has the
highest spend at
£216 per 1000
pop, and West
Lewisham has the
second highest at
£193 per 1000 pop
88
Multiple Sclerosis
89
Hounslow has the
highest spend at
£791 per 1000
pop, and West
Hillingdon has the
second highest at
£780 per 1000 pop
90
Hammersmith and
Fulham has the
highest spend at
£313 per 1000
pop, and West
Enfield has the
second highest at
£298 per 1000 pop
91
Hillingdon has the
highest number of day
case admissions at
139 per 100,000 pop,
and Hounslow has the
second highest at 136
per 100,000 pop
92
Southwark has the
highest number of
bed days 41, and
Enfield has the
second highest at
20
93
• Elective spend varies from under £250 per 1000 population to
over £750 per 1000 population
94
Multiple Sclerosis summary
Outpatients, primary care prescribing
and diagnostics
95
Camden and Islington
have the highest new
outpatient neurology
appointments at 2470 per
100,000 pop
96
Bexley has the
second highest
spend at £1932 per
1000 pop
Bromley has the
highest spend on
these drugs at
£2220 per 1000 pop
97
98
Enfield has the
highest spend on
these drugs at
£331per 1000 pop
Bexley has the
second highest
spend at £301 per
1000 pop
Croydon
Newham
Tower Hamlets
Sutton
Waltham Forest
Rasagiline Mesilate is an irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-B used
as a monotherapy to treat symptoms in early Parkinson's disease
99
Tower Hamlets has
the highest spend
on these drugs at
£2924 per 1000 pop
Sutton has the
second highest
spend at £2832 per
1000 pop
Ealing
Merton
Westminster
Kingston
West London
100
Tower Hamlets has
the highest spend
on these drugs at
£6067 per 1000 pop
Hammersmith
and Fulham has
the second
highest spend at
£5554 per 1000
pop
Haringey
Enfield
Camden
Merton
Richmond
Pregabalin is a medication used to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain,
fibromyalgia, and generalized anxiety disorder
101
Bromley has the
highest spend on
these drugs at
£197per 1000 pop
Camden has the
second highest
spend at £159
per 1000 pop
Haringey
Barking and
Dagenham
Newham
Hillingdon
Hounslow
Rizatriptan is used for the treatment of migraine headaches
Tower Hamlets has
the second highest
spend at £5305 per
1000 pop
Hounslow has the
highest spend at
£5840 per 1000 pop
102
Hounslow again has
a high spend, having
the second highest
at £994 per 1000
pop
Brent has the
highest spend at
£1026 per 1000
pop
103
• London has some of the highest out patient attendance rates in
England (only 2 CCGs below England average)
• There are significant outliers in prescribing spend
• There is significant variation in use of diagnostics
104
Summary for outpatients, primary care
prescribing and diagnostics
Enhanced acute neurology services
Nick Losseff
105
106
Acute Neurology
• London SCN organisational audit of secondary and tertiary care
2014 identified no provider with a systematic mechanism for
admission of patients with a primary neurologic condition under a
neurologist.
[http://www.londonscn.nhs.uk/publications/]
• Aim – to develop proposals for an ownership model.
• Original vision “hyperacute neurology units”
107
Acute neurology
• 4 providers delivering ”HANU” models
• Evaluation by UCLP of 2
108
Implementation
• Suffered from the usual vested interests
• Network provided outside direction
109
Acute neurology
• Huge numbers attending A+E with neurosymptoms
• (Kings / UCH – 1000 per month)
110
Summary of findings
1. Improved Patient Experience - feedback from staff suggested the HANU models resulted in positive outcomes for patients
2. Improved Clinical Outcome and Process-
3. Improved diagnosis- early neurology input showed the benefit of identifying less common or complex disorders frequently not recognised by non-neurological specialists.
4. Readmission reduction- comparative data pre and post HANU shows a reduction in the number of patients who re-attended for headache(13.9% vs 3.8%) and epilepsy (6.1% vs 0%)
5. Reduction of ED visits and unplanned hospital admissions- the findings from the study also suggest additional benefits arising from rapid follow-up in outpatient clinics which might further reduce ED visits and unplanned hospital admissions.
6: Admission avoidance- during the pilot at Kings 19% of admissions avoided from the total number of patients reviewed
111
Models of care
• Greatest benefits were observed secondary to more specialised
input at the A+E level rather than by the “ownership” of
inpatients, as
• Admissions were in any case substantially reduced.
• Need for secondary care level inpatients was small, but
prevented referral to tertiary beds for common problems.
112
113
114
Interlocking models
• Common conditions
• Integrated care
• WONT HAPPEN WITHOUT COMMISSIONER DIRECTION
!!!
115
Thank you
Dr Dominic Heaney FRCP PhD
Consultant Neurologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
UCLH NHS Foundation Trust
Community Neurology Service
The Challenge
• Neurological conditions – headache, dizziness and faints and fits
particular prevalent within communities
• Changes in condition e.g. new diagnosis, deterioration, pregnancy,
co-morbidity can require specialist input
• Traditional model of focussing specialist knowledge in secondary
(and tertiary care) cumbersome, expensive and arguably fails to
meet need.
• Secondary care doctors find clinics blocked by “long term follow up”
• Challenge for GPs – short consultation and experience
118
London outpatient
appointments
80,158 £17,314,128
Estimate of common
conditions appointments not
needing neurologist
14,500 £3,160,000
Follow-ups 110,000 £13,580,000
Common conditions data
Admissions
119
Total London neurological admissions 229,355
Total admission spend £107,914,000
Common conditions admissions (14%) 35, 300
Common conditions spend (19%) £20,908,000
Readmissions 2015/16 (SUS) 8,700
Epilepsy total non
elective admissions
6,742 £9,242,808
Headache non elective
admissions
8, 962 £6,036,149
The Approach
• Embed “specialists” within primary setting
• Three tiered approach;
GP
Community based nurse specialist
Neurologist (embedded or hub)
e.g. Camden Integrated Care Service: community-based epilepsy
nurse specialist (1.0 FTE) working closely with consultant (0.2
FTE) delivering care in primary care setting
• Receiving referrals after “advertising” service and also pro-
actively case finding
• Nurse supported by neurologists: options e.g. embedded or
hub
Challenges
• Staff recruitment and retention!
• Information technology
• Pharmacy governance
(“calciumgate”)
• Ownership: CCG or Trust
Outcomes
• Very flexible, now seeing first seizures
• Patient and GP satisfaction high
• Rapidly identify patients with high level of need
• Early data suggests reduction in A&E attendance
• Move of long term follow up patients from hospital to the
community
• Neurologist learning of primary care environment
improves quality of care
Improving the integration and
coordination of neurological care
Adapting existing service models
Jacqui Wakefield/Catherine Atkinson
SCN Integration Workstream Leads Nov 2016
‘As is’ for those with Neurological
LTC • People with neurological conditions often have complex multi
agency support;
• Have the highest levels of pain, anxiety and depression.
• Have the lowest health-related quality of life (EQ5D) of any long-term condition.
• The current system is broken • PAC report findings Feb 2016
• ‘Invisible Patient Report’ Neurological Alliance 2015
• Risks of continuing with the current system are • Unnecessary A&E attendance
• Avoidable occupied bed day use
• Pressure on out-patient neurology and finite medical resources
• Variation and inequalities in health care access
• On-going avoidable spend on secondary care
• Poorer patient outcomes and experience
Integrated care – from the
evidence
• “seeks to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of care for
people and populations by ensuring that services are well
coordinated around their needs – it is by definition both patient
centred and population orientated.”
• “Integration is not about structures organisations or pathways it
is about better outcomes for service users”
• “It allows patients and their carers to navigate the NHS and
social care systems in order to meet their needs
• “It aims to deliver cost efficiency for the system and improve
clinical and wider quality outcomes.
Primary / Secondary Care
Interfaces in practice
What do patients want?
(Neurological Alliance 2015)
• Local services
• Quick and accurate diagnosis
• Rapid access to expert support and treatment
• Self management support
• Reduced admissions and length of stay
Integration from service user perspective
Poor integration leads to:-
• Confusion
• Repetition
• Delay and dissatisfaction
• Duplication, gaps in service delivery
• People getting lost in the system
Integration provides:
• Strengthened preventative services
• Better planning
• Personal involvement of the patient
• Free access to good information
• Reduction in unscheduled care
Overarching framework
SCN agreed core principles of
integrated care for service
providers:
• Case ascertainment
• Care planning
• Risk stratification
• Access to specialist neurology in the community
• Self management support
• Technology
• Specific pathways to manage and treat UTI in the community
– a major cause of unplanned admission for patients with
neurologic disability
Principles of good integrated care
Key principle Delivery method Examples
Case ascertainment:
Knowing the
population;
E.g. Register
SE London, Wandsworth
Barnet hold registers of
patients with LTNC. (Barnet
showed reduction unscheduled care
and unnecessary GP attendance)
Risk stratification-
What do they need ,
when, how and by
who?
Central point of access, risk
management, care pathways
looking at diagnosis to end of
life
In Barnet patients on the
register are aligned to
care pathways indicating
regularity of review and
approach.
Care planning
There is a defined plan in
place.
The patient has been
involved in the plan and
knows who to call/ where to
go.
Care navigator/ case
coordinator/ Specialist
nurse; Shared electronic
patient record; patient
held record. MDT –
Health and social care
joint reviews.
Principles of good integrated
care cont. Principle Method examples
Access to Specialist
expertise
Rapid access to
specialist neuro
knowledge in community
settings;
e.g Specialist nurses
linking in with acute
neurologists
Virtual clinics/ telephone
lines /fast track
appointments
Self management
support
Variety of methods
available to support self
management
Bridges approach;
NWLondon UTI pathway;
peer support groups.
Technology Virtual clinics, self
management support,
Electronic patient
records
NHNN MS triage *Neuro
response ; Self care hub
SCN work stream actions
• Disseminating the core principles to service providers via a
benchmarking tool of key principles with examples practice
exemplars.
• Peer review from SCN group to facilitate service development.
References
• NHS England. GP Patient Survey 2015. http://results.gp-patient.co.uk/report/explanation.aspx
• Neuro Numbers, Neurological Alliance, 2004
• http://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile-group/mental-health/profile/neurology/data
• 4The Neurological Alliance (2003). Report. Neuro Numbers: A brief review of the numbers of people in the UK with a neurological condition
• Monitor - Enablers and barriers to Integrated Care report June 2012
• Transforming Community Neurology report, Thames Valley SCN 2016
London SCN website – Neuroscience http://www.londonscn.nhs.uk/networks/mental-health-dementia-
neuroscience/