Upload
nguyendat
View
222
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
464
glands, and its several relations, must beexcessively irksome ; besides, to burden a
memory, not remarkable for its retentive
powers, would necessarily give rise to im-patience ; and the more, since it appears tobe an " intrusion upon time," that we findso usefully disposed of. We would beg,then, that Dr. M’Dowel would curtail hislectures ; it will, at least, give an opportu-nity to Lennox for further " sketches" ofcharacter, that may afford him more inte-Test and gratification than the study of hisprofession. We would also entreat of him toproceed, since it appears that " the Rich-Tnond School is losing ground," and Lennox’s*’ sketches" would have such a beneficial
’effect; they may be the means of restoringits character. We are told, that the eack-
ling of a goose once saved the capitol. Ihave waited patiently for the remainingsketches, but as they have not arrived up tothis date, it appears more advisable to makeno further delay.
1 have the honour to be,Your -very- obedient servant,
PHILALETHES.Dec. 23, 1828.
LONDON MEDICAL SOCIETY.—ERGOT OF
RYE.
To the Editor of THE LANCET.
SIR,Your invaluable Journal deserveswell of its numerous supporters, for havingso fully and accurately reported the discus-sion at the above Society, on Mr. Lord’s’case, more particularly on account of theOpinions delivered by the several speakers,with respect to the efficacy of the ergot ofrye, in inducing uterine action ; the properperiod, the doses, and form of administer-ing it. There appears to have been a great,contrariety of opinion as to its specific ef-fect, as Dr. Blick asserted, that it was com-pletely inefficient. Now, Sir, assertionshould be supported by proof, as the ipse,dixit of any man must be received with cau-tion, especially with regard to a remedy‘which has latterly been looked upon as a
;great auxiliary in the hands of the obstetric;practitioner. Dr. Biick, it is to be hoped,has given a fair trial to this medicine beforehe pronounced its condemnation ; if so,
why did he not relate cases in which it hadfailed. Although a young’ practitioner in’midwifery, I have had opportunities of ad-:aninisteting the ergot in ten cases, underthe following circumstances :-Each patient, when 1 was called upon to
attend, was repoited to have active pains,and the labour was said to have been so far
advanced, that if I did not immediatelyobey the summons, the woman was likelyto be delivered before I could reach herresidence. On my arrival, 1 certainly foundeach woman in pain, and the os uteri, onexamination, dilated to the siza of a crownpiece ; but soon after I had taken my seat
at the bedside, and asked the necessary
questions, uterine action ceased. This isknown not to be an unusual occurrence, onthe entrance of the practitioner, particu.larly if a young man and a stranger. Ineaco of these ten cases, I waited fromfour to six and eight hours, and have even
! retired to another room, and uterine actiondid not recur. I have then proposed the use ofthe ergot ; made a decoction (one drachm,sliced, to six ounces of water, and boiled forten minutes) and administered a third ofthe fluid every fifteen minutes. In threeof these cases only did I find it necessary to
give a third dose, and in all of them the me-dicine acted within half an hour, producingstrong labour pains, and’hastening the birthof the child, which, I have no doubt, onlyfor its use, would have been protracted formany hours. Indeed, several of these pa-tients have, after its use, in fifteen or twentyminutes, cried out, on the pain recurring," Oh ! Sir, that you gave me has broughton the pains." ’lhese facts having fallenunder my own observation, 1 cannot sub.scribe to the inefficacy of ergot of rye, insuch cases as it may be admissible. If a
practitioner have ascertained the necessity,and decided on the administration of the
secale, he should never leave his patientfor a moment, as the uterine action, afterits use, becomes so strong as to effect theexpulsion of the child very quickly. In firstcases of labour, unless the membranes harebeen some time ruptured, and the pains con.tinue lingering and ineffective, I have rea-son to doubt the propriety of its adiiiinis.
tration, which doubt, if confirmed by futureexperience, I shall take the liberty of sub.mitting to the profession, through yourhighly useful periodical.
Every new remedy should be scrupulouslytested before it ’be recommended generallyto the profession ; and 1 should hope everypractitioner, who is in the habit of prescrib-ing the secale cornutum, will note its effects,and lay the result of their experience beforetheir medical brethren. Few, I know, havegreater opportunities of giving it a fair tiialthan Dr. Hopkins, who, I trust, will sliortlyfurnish the profession with the details ofhis experience. In preparing a decoctionof it, 1 look on the slicing of it as absolutelynecessary.
I have the honour to be, Sir,Your obedient servant
Dec. ’?ti, I8d3. R. C.