Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Longitudinal Coordination of Care
Pilots WGMonday, July 7, 2014
Meeting Etiquette• Remember: If you are not speaking, please keep your
phone on mute
• Do not put your phone on hold. If you need to take a call, hang up and dial in again when finished with your other call o Hold = Elevator Music = frustrated speakers and
participants
• This meeting is being recordedo Another reason to keep your phone on mute when not
speaking
• Use the “Chat” feature for questions, comments and items you would like the moderator or other participants to know.o Send comments to All Panelists so they can be
addressed publically in the chat, or discussed in the meeting (as appropriate).
From S&I Framework to Participants:Hi everyone: remember to keep your phone on mute
All Panelists
• http://wiki.siframework.org/Longitudinal+CC+WG+Committed+Member+Guidance• http://wiki.siframework.org/LCC+Pilots+WG
3
ReminderJoin the LCC WG & Complete Pilot Survey
** If your contact information has recently changed, please send your updated information to Becky Angeles at [email protected]
Topic Presenter
Welcome & Announcements Evelyn, Lynette
Discussion: National Quality Forum Measure Gaps Care Coordination Report
Lauralei Dorian
Next Steps Lynette
Agenda
4
• Purpose– Provide tools and guidance for managing and evaluating
LCC pilot Projects– Create a forum to share lessons learned and best
practices– Provide subject matter expertise– Leverage existing and new partnerships
• Goals– Bring awareness on available national standards for HIE
and care coordination– Real world evaluation of parts of most recent HL7 C-CDA
Revisions Implementation Guide (IG)– Validation of ToC and Care Plan/HHPoC datasets
Pilot Work Group Purpose and Goals
5
Meeting Reminders
S&I Framework Hosted Meetings: http://wiki.siframework.org/Longitudinal+Coordination+of+Care • LCC Pilot WG meetings are every other Monday from 11:00– 12:00 pm
Eastern – Focus on validation and testing of LCC Standards for Transitions of
Care & Care Plan exchange
HL7 Structured Documents WG Meetings• Thursdays from 10:00 – 12:00pm Eastern
– WebEx: https://global.gotowebinar.com/register/144336339
– Dial In: 770-657-9270; Access Code: 310940•A pre-publication draft of CCDA R2.0 specification was distributed to the SDWG list serv on July 3rd: (http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/structure/docs.cfm?).
•If you are a negative balloter, please review and reply with any comments by July 11.•Currently discussing CCDA R2.0 Template OID versioning issue.
HL7 Patient Care WG Meeting Reminders
• Coordination of Care Services Specification Project– Provide SOA capabilities/models to support coordination of patient
care across the continuum– Reconciling May 2014 Ballot Cycle Comments – Current working documents found here: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?
title=Coordination_of_Care_Services_Specification_Project
– Tuesdays from 5:00 – 6:00pm ET • Meeting Information:
– Web Meeting URL: https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/meetings/join?uuid=M55ZKYUA35CE2U3J4SV41XMZR3-3MNZ
» Meeting Number: 193 323 052 – Phone: 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 071582
HL7 Patient Care WG Meeting Reminders, cont’d...• Care Plan Project
– Reconciling May 2014 Ballot Cycle Comments for the updated Care Plan DAM and story boards.
– Current working documents found here: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Care_Plan_Project_2012
– Every other Wednesday from 4:00 – 5:30pm ET • Next meeting is July 16th • Meeting Information:
– Web Meeting URL: https://intermountainmeetings.webex.com/intermountainmeetings/j.php?J=621920971
– Phone: 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 943377
HL7 Patient Care WG Meeting Reminders, cont’d...• Health Concern Topic
– Developing Health Concern DAM for September HL7 Ballot Cycle– Current working documents found here:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Health_Concern– Thursdays from 4:00 – 5:00pm ET
• Next meeting scheduled for July 10th • Meeting Information:
– Web URL: https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/joinbynumber
» Meeting Number: 233 955 026 » Phone: 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 943377
HL7 Patient Care WG Meeting Reminders, cont’d...• Patient Care FHIR Resources and Profiles
• Reviewing/Finalizing storyboards for the HL7 Sept WGM FHIR Clinical Connectathon
• Developing FHIR Resource for Referral and Transition/Transfer of Care
• Current working documents found here: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Patient_Care_Resources
– Thursdays from 5:00 – 6:30pm ET• Next meeting scheduled for July 10th • Meeting Information:
– Web URL: www.webex.com – Meeting Number: 198 139 396
» Phone: 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 943377
HIMSS Health Story Roundtable
• Why attend?– Advocate and build support for the Health Story Project– Collaborate and network with Health Story Project supporters– Engage with industry leaders in monthly meetings– Participation is open to any HIMSS Members at no additional cost
• Meets monthly on the 1st Monday from 4pm-5pm ET. Next meeting scheduled for July 7th
• Meeting Information:– Web URL: Click here to view agenda and download the
calendar invitation (this link will also work to join the meeting)– Meeting Number: 927 311 214– Meeting Password: meeting– To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you
join the meeting, or call the number below and enter the access code.
» Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239» Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300
FACA Meeting Reminders (see end of deck for updates)
HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use WG• Next meeting scheduled for July 15th from 10:00am – 12:00pm ET• http://www.healthit.gov/facas/calendar/2014/07/15/policy-meaningful-use-workgroup
HIT Standards Committee• Next meeting scheduled for July 16th from 9:00am – 3:00pm ET• http://www.healthit.gov/facas/calendar/2014/07/16/hit-standards-committee
HIT Policy Committee• Next meeting scheduled for July 8th from 9:00am – 1:15pm EThttp://www.healthit.gov/FACAS/calendar/2014/07/08/hit-policy-committee
HIT Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team• Cancelled until further notice
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care WG• Workgroup has been retired as of 05/29/14 meeting
LCC Pilot WG Timeline: Aug 2013 – Sept 2014
Mile
ston
es
Revisions for HL7 CCDA IG
Complete
HL7 Fall Ballot Close
LCC Pilot Monitoring & Evaluation
LCC Pilot Proposal Review
HL7 Ballot Publication
LCC Pilots Close
HL7 Ballot & Reconciliation
LCC Pilot WG Launch
NY Care Coordination Go-Live
HL7 C-CDA IG Revisions
LCC Pilot Wrap-Up
LCC Pilot Test Spec. Complete
HL7
Bal
lot
LCC
Pilo
t WG
GSI Health Go-Live
IMPACT Go-Live
Upcoming LCC Pilots Meeting Presentations
• Upcoming presentations:• July 21st:
• Care at Hand Presentation / Demo• August 4th:
• Lantana HIMSS Health Story Presentation & SEE Tool Demo
• IMPACT Updates (tentative)• August 18th
• GSI Health Pilots Follow-up• TBD
• VHA Care Plan FHIR Introduction
Priority-Setting for Healthcare Performance Measurement: Care Coordination
Lauralei Dorian
17
Care CoordinationCommittee Members
CARE COORDINATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Susan Reinhard, PhD, RN, FAAN (co-chair) AARP
Mark Redding, MD (co-chair) Community Health Access Project
David Ackman, MD, MPH Amerigroup
Richard Birkel, PhD, MPA National Council on Aging
Don Casey, MD, MPH, MBA IPO4Health
David Cusano, JD Georgetown University Health Policy Institute
Woody Eisenberg, MD, FACP Pharmacy Quality Alliance
Nancy Giunta, PhD, MSW Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, CUNY
Carolyn Ingram, MBA Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc.
Gerri Lamb, PhD, RN, FAAN Arizona State University
Russell Leftwich, MD State of Tennessee, Office of eHealth Initiatives
Linda Lindeke, PhD, RN, CNP University of Minnesota, School of Nursing
Rita Mangione-Smith, MD, MPH Seattle Children’s Research Institute
Sharon McCauley, MS, MBA, RDN, LDN, FAND Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Judy Ng, PhD, MPH National Committee for Quality Assurance
Michael Parchman, MD, MPH MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation
Fred Rachman, MD Alliance of Chicago Community Health Services
Robert Roca, MD, MPH, MBA American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education
Vija Sehgal, MD, PhD, MPH Waianae Coast Comprehensive Health Center
Daniel Stein, MBA Stewards of Change
Ilene Stein, JD Service Employees International Union
18
Project Overview
Care Coordination Project Objectives
19
Guided by a multistakeholder committee, the project will consider and prioritize opportunities to measure care coordination in the context of a broad “health neighborhood.”
The project considered coordination between safety-net providers of primary care and providers of community and social services that impact health.
The work is intended to broaden the current scope of care coordination performance measurement to account for the influence of social determinants such as housing, transportation, and the environment.
Care Coordination Project Objectives, Continued
20
Interoperable data systems that link health and human services information could provide rich new sources for performance measurement; the project will explore this potential as well as challenges associated with sharing data for the purposes of care coordination.
The project will identify existing measures and measure concepts that could successfully measure care coordination in targeted areas.
A final report will provide recommendations on high-leverage opportunities and next steps for measure development, endorsement, and use.
Definition of Care Coordination
21
“Care coordination is the deliberate synchronization of activities and information to improve health outcomes by ensuring that care recipients’ and families’ needs and preferences for healthcare and community services are met over time.”
Developed based on AHRQ Care Coordination Measures Atlas, the NQF Preferred Practices and Performance Measures for Measuring and Reporting Care Coordination, and committee feedback.
Related Efforts in Care Coordination and Measurement: NQF Consensus Development Process
22
2006: Care Coordination Framework identified five domains essential to the future measurement of care coordination:
▫ Healthcare home
▫ Proactive plan of care and follow-up
▫ Communication
▫ Information systems
▫ Transitions or handoffs
2010: Preferred Practices and Performance Measures for Measuring and Reporting Care Coordination
2013-current: Care Coordination 3-Phase Measure Evaluation Project
Care Coordination Conceptual Framework
23
Committee Recommendations: Priority Measure Domains
24
Joint Creation of Person-Centered Plan of Care
Utilization of the Health Neighborhood to Execute
the Plan of CareAchievement of Outcomes
Comprehensive Assessment Linkages/Synchronization Experience
Goal Setting
Quality of Services
Progression Toward Goals
Shared Accountability Efficiency
Comprehensive Assessment Subdomains
25
Document care recipient’s current supports and assets Assess function Assess social needs Assess behavioral health needs Assess medication management needs Assess health literacy Measure care recipient/family level of activation/engagement Capture preferences and goals Estimate health risk level and customize care coordination approach
appropriately Continuous holistic monitoring
Shared Accountability Subdomains
26
Plan of care documents all members of the care team, including community providers
Plan of care assigns responsibilities for meeting care recipients’ goals and care team members accept them
Linkages/Synchronization Subdomains
27
Shared documentation and understanding of care coordination goals by clinical providers, community providers and care recipient/family Appropriate community services identified and contacted based on needs assessment Care recipient/family successfully engages with and utilizes community services Bi-directional communication to facilitate coordination Frequent and accurate communication to solve problems
Progression Toward Goals Subdomains
28
Resolution of unmet needs, as documented in ongoing assessment
Services congruent with person-centered goals and preferences
Maximized health outcomes and functional status Reduce care recipient risk through interventions Increased care recipient/family level of activation
HIT Needed to Support Paradigm Shift
29
The increasing use of HIT can support a paradigm shift in care coordination, ultimately yielding substantial improvements in health care delivery. Currently, significant HIT efforts are underway:▫ AHRQ is currently gathering information from the field on what is
needed to enable electronic quality measurement, particularly testing criteria for Meaningful Use Stage 3.
▫ ONC’s priorities include promoting more consistent use of data fields within care plans, matching data capture through electronic health records with actual clinical workflows, and the use of clinical decision support. ONC plans to effectively design and implement HIT workflows across provider types.
Data Standards to Support Care Coordination and Plan of Care
30
In order for data standards to enable interoperability, specification of a minimum data set around the care team roster is needed. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) supports the representation of the care team and allows for relationships between all care team members to be captured. This specifically includes: ▫ Electronic contact information for each team member, the
professional role of each provider, and the familial and legal relationship of family care team members to the care recipient.
▫ HL7 CDA also allows for relationships between those care team members and other data elements and activities in the care plan.
Front-Line Perspective on Interoperability: Alliance of Chicago
31
Alliance of Chicago encourages the use of technology to coordinate services in ways that effectively reduce burden:▫ EHR’s with longitudinal records and clinical decision support that includes
prompts for non-clinical, community-based elements, prompts for information about a care recipient’s visit, and reminders to review previous entries to determine necessary follow ups.
▫ EHR’s are also connected to a comprehensive and up-to-date list of community resources generated by University of Chicago students
▫ Data linkage with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alerts providers when there is a public health concern or disease outbreak in the community that may be relevant to the individual seeking care
Additional Committee Recommendations: Priorities for Care Coordination and Performance Measurement
32
Priority measure domains reflect the need for person-centered, accountable care.
Innovation is desired, but stronger evidence of effective care coordination practices is fundamental for measure development.
HHS should measure its own progress in reducing fragmentation experienced by front-line providers.
Target care coordination efforts based on individuals’ needs.
Additional Committee Recommendations, Continued
33
Accelerate the work of culture change to achieve person-centered, team-based care.
Continue standardization of data elements to support care planning and measurement.
Balance payment incentives carefully to fulfill all three aims of the NQS.
34
Comments and Questions
• Homework Assignments:– Complete Pilot Survey– Sign up as an LCC Committed Member– Submit Pilot Documentation Proposals
• Available on the LCC Pilot SWG Wiki: http://wiki.siframework.org/LCC+Pilots+WG
• Email to Lynette Elliott ([email protected])
• If you would like to learn more about participating in the eLTSS Initiative, please email Evelyn Gallego ([email protected])
Next Steps
35
• LCC Leads– Dr. Larry Garber ([email protected])– Dr. Terry O’Malley ([email protected]) – Dr. Bill Russell ([email protected]) – Sue Mitchell ([email protected])
• LCC/HL7 Coordination Lead– Dr. Russ Leftwich ([email protected])
• Federal Partner Lead– Jennie Harvell ([email protected])
• Initiative Coordinator– Evelyn Gallego ([email protected])
• Project Management– Pilots Lead: Lynette Elliott ([email protected])– Use Case Lead: Becky Angeles ([email protected])
LCC Initiative: Contact Information
36LCC Wiki Site: http://wiki.siframework.org/Longitudinal+Coordination+of+Care
37
FACA UpdatesAs of 07/07/2014
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14
• HITPC MU WG will be presenting the suggestions from 4 (Provider, Hospital, ACO, Vendor) panels back to HITPC’s next meeting in July. • See following the slides for comments by each panel
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14, cont’d…
• Panel 1 (Provider) Suggestions: • Shift ToC to MU 3• 2-year cycle too fast• Require implementation (demonstrate use), but not
specific percentage for everyone• Focus on outcomes-based measures• Focus on interoperability, but not %• Focus on reporting to registries and public health
agencies
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14, cont’d…
• Panel 2 (Eligible Hospitals) Suggestions: • Meaningful use is transformative and increases
transparency, but standardization for exchange is needed• Standards needed to exchange information across
state boundaries • Need more time to get ready for stage 3
• Vendors not ready• Need time for recipients to get ready for exchange• Need time to learn from stage 2
• Need alignment of CQMs
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14, cont’d…
• Panel 3 (Advanced Models of Care) Suggestions: • Momentum needs to continue• Exchange in the local community is most important• Additional and more stable funding to support the public
health informatics infrastructure will be critical to sustaining public health gains
• Electronic lab reporting and syndromic surveillance will lead to greater capacities for early disease detection and more real-time population health assessments during public health emergencies
• Build greater HIT capabilities for immunizations and reportable conditions
• Patient portals must accommodate a wide range of literacy and should provide access in preferred language and interoperability with assistive devices
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14, cont’d…
• Panel 4 (Vendor) Suggestions: • Need more time to develop, test, certify
• 18 mo lead time after all regs, specifications, tools finalized
• Focus on high priority areas where infrastructure is needed (interoperability for care coordination and CQMs)
• Policies to facilitate interoperability needed:• State regs
• Patient matching
• Alignment of CQMs
• Allow 90-day reporting period for each new stage
FACA Updates: HITPC MU WG 06/20/14, cont’d…
• Overall Suggestions: • Prioritize information exchange for care coordination
and patient engagement• Proprietary business interests impede exchange• Policies for exchange across state boundaries and
patient matching are needed• There has been too much focus on the letter rather
than the spirit of meaningful use• Need to avoid being overly prescriptive• Quality measure alignment is needed
• Next Steps• • Present back to HIT Policy Committee on 7/8
FACA Updates: HITPC Cert/Adoption WG 06/26/14
• The workgroup considered draft recommendations brought forward by a subgroup
• Recommendations to publicize the results of the ONC workforce development programs and studies to identify core competencies have been accomplished
• Information was presented on recommendations pertaining to program development to meet the emerging needs of the HIT workforce. However, no direct action by ONC was reported on these recommendations:• Recommend additional funding for new workforce programs
that create a workforce development pipeline with a focus on inclusion of rural, underserved learners, veterans and middle school students
• Recommend funding studies of the impact of HIT on the workforce
FACA Updates: HITPC Cert/Adoption WG 06/26/14, cont’d…
• Members decided to repeat the two above recommendations, urging ONC to take advantage of several existing opportunities.
• The subgroup carried out its recommendation that ONC host a SOC input process from the HIT community. The Department of Labor is currently soliciting comments due July 21, 2014.• The subgroup is compiling a report with the intent of
adding a new code for health informatics under health care occupations.
• Members agreed to ask the HITPC to support the new health informatics SOC.
FACA Updates: HITPC Cert/Adoption WG 06/26/14, cont’d…
• Two new recommendations were presented for the workgroup’s approval for submission to the HITPC:
• Recommend that the focus on the health IT workforce is retained in the new HITPC workgroup structure as part of health IT implementation.
• Recommend that the ONC continue to connect with other federal agencies and key stakeholders to further the workforce needs required to establish and sustain an effective and efficient interoperable health IT ecosystem.
• Members agreed on the two new recommendations without making comments.
• Next Steps:
• Minor changes win the slides for the submission of the recommendations to the HITPC in July.
