6
Fig. S1. Placebo test results (n=4). Four participants completed the same protocol as the main experimental group, but were given an exotendon with stiffness less than 5% that of a normal exotendon. These participants showed no change in running economy, relative to natural running, with the placebo exotendon (two-tailed one-sample t-tests). Error bars represent one standard deviation. net metabolic power (% change from natural) day 1 day 2 trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 trial 4 more efficient less efficient p = 0.16 p = 0.67 p = 0.88 p = 0.52 -15 -10 -5 0 5 Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information Journal of Experimental Biology • Supplementary information

LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Fig. S1. Placebo test results (n=4). Four participants completed the same protocol as the main

experimental group, but were given an exotendon with stiffness less than 5% that of a normal

exotendon. These participants showed no change in running economy, relative to natural

running, with the placebo exotendon (two-tailed one-sample t-tests). Error bars represent one

standard deviation.

net m

etab

olic

pow

er(%

cha

nge

from

nat

ural

)day 1 day 2

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 trial 4

mor

e ef

ficie

ntle

ss e

ffici

ent

p = 0.16

p = 0.67 p = 0.88p = 0.52

-15

-10

-5

0

5

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion

Page 2: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Fig. S2. Joint-level kinematics and kinetics (n=4). Traces show average joint angles, moments,

and powers across the gait cycle for natural running (dark red) and exotendon running. Kinetics

from exotendon running are separated into exotendon contributions (blue), biological tissue

(muscles, tendons, etc.) contributions (light red), and the total joint kinetics (black) for the four

participants from Experiment 3. Thin traces show stride-averaged trajectories for individual

participants (n=4) while the thick traces show trajectories averaged across participants. Vertical

dashed lines indicate across-participant average toe-off time for exotendon running (light red)

and natural running (dark red).

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion

Page 3: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Fig. S3. Muscle activity (n=4). Average muscle activity for each participant (thin traces) and

across participants (solid lines) for natural running (dark red) and running with the exotendon

(light red) as a function of gait cycle. The vertical dashed lines indicate the average time at which

the toe lifts off the ground during exotendon running (light red) and natural running (dark red).

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion

Page 4: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity,

computed from EMG recordings, across stance and swing phases of gait. Statistical comparison

(paired t-test with Holm-Šidák corrections, α = 0.05) revealed no significant changes in muscle

activity as a result of running with the exotendon.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0

0.02

0.04

0

0.05

0.1

0

0.05

0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0

0.1

0.2

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0

0.2

0.4

0

0.05

0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

stance swing

aver

age

mus

cle

activ

atio

niliopsoas sartorius adductor group

rectus femoris vastus lateralis vastus medialis

gluteus maximus gluteus medius tibialis anterior

biceps femoris semitendinosus lateral gastrocnemius

medial gastrocnemius soleus peroneus

stance swing stance swing

p=5.2x10-1 p=8.5x10-1 p=2.4x10-1 p=5.2x10-2 p=6.2x10-1 p=8.8x10-1

p=3.7x10-3 p=2.1x10-1 p=6.4x10-3 p=5.8x10-1 p=1.3x10-1 p=5.3x10-1

p=7.4x10-1 p=3.3x10-1 p=6.8x10-1 p=2.2x10-2 p=4.1x10-2 p=2.2x10-2

p=1.5x10-1 p=1.9x10-3 p=2.8x10-2 p=3.7x10-1 p=5.2x10-2 p=5.4x10-1

p=9.1x10-1 p=5.9x10-1 p=3.3x10-1 p=8.6x10-1 p=2.2x10-2 p=3.3x10-1

aver

age

mus

cle

activ

atio

nav

erag

e m

uscl

e ac

tivat

ion

aver

age

mus

cle

activ

atio

nav

erag

e m

uscl

e ac

tivat

ion

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion

Page 5: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Fig. S5. Exotendon hypothesized mechanism of savings including ‘force rate’ costs. The

total energetic cost (bold, dark red line) comprises costs that increase with stride frequency (thin,

dark red line), and costs that decrease with stride frequency (thin, black line). The increasing

costs can be broken into subcomponents, here force rate costs (long dashed, dark red line)

and swing costs (short dashed, dark red line), although others could be added as well. When the

exotendon assists leg swing, the swing costs subcomponent line shifts (short dashed, light red

line). This in turn shifts the net increasing costs line (thin, light red line), resulting in a new total

energy curve (bold, light red line), and a new the optimal stride frequency (vertical, dashed light

red line). The operating points on the curves of both the increasing costs and decreasing

costs (Point B) as well as on the total energy expenditure curve (Point A) shift down and to the

right with the exotendon, as does Point D (the operating point on the curve of the swing

costs subcomponent of the increasing costs). The net savings in energy expenditure occurs

despite Point C (operating point on the curve of the force rate costs) shifting up and to the right.

Thus, even though some costs might increase with adaptation to the exotendon, decreases in

other costs can result in net savings.

theo

retic

alen

ergy

expe

dntiu

re

stride frequency

total energy,natural

total energy,exotendon

decreasing costs

increasing costs, natural

increasing costs, exotendonforce rate costsswing costs, natural

swing costs, exotendon

A

B

C

D

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion

Page 6: LQIRUPDWLRQbiomechatronics.cit.cmu.edu/publications/Simpson_2019...Fig. S4. Average muscle activity (n=4). Comparisons of average, normalized muscle activity, computed from EMG recordings,

Movie 1. Running with the exotendon.

Journal of Experimental Biology: doi:10.1242/jeb.202895: Supplementary information

Jour

nal o

f Exp

erim

enta

l Bio

logy

• S

uppl

emen

tary

info

rmat

ion