LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY 20151 LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Performance

LSST Camera CD-3 Review • Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY • 2015 1LSST Safety Council Camera Review • Bremerton, WA • 2015

LSST CameraPerformance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview

Joe KennyCamera Safety Manager

LSST Safety Council Review18 August 2015

LSST Camera CD-3 Review • Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY • 2015 2

Outline

• LSST Camera Safety Program Purpose and Goals

• Requirements Documents & Staffing

• System Safety Engineering

• Hazards and Hazard Mitigation

• Summit Safety

• Summary

LSST Safety Council Camera Review • Bremerton, WA • 2015


LSST Camera Safety Goals

• Purpose– Prevention of unwanted events– Integrate safety into LSST Camera Project from cradle to

grave

• Objective– No recordable injuries (TRCs and DARTs)– No environmentally significant releases– Protection of equipment



ES&H Requirements Documents

• DOE O 413.3B, DOE G 450.4-1C

• LPM-18 LSST Project Safety Policy– Provides top-level objectives, requirements, and safety program

organization, management and responsibilities– Establishes LSST Safety Manager and LSST Safety Council

• LCA-138 LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan




LCA-138 (LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan)…

“Includes the Camera system safety program, environment, safety, and health (ES&H) plans and the means by which personnel and environmental safety processes are managed across the camera collaboration, and the quality management system for the project.”

Details the process used to manage the Performance and Safety Assurance Programs for the Camera Project

• LCA-31 LSST Camera System Safety Program Plan• LCA-14 LSST Camera Hazard Analysis Report• LCA-15 LSST Camera Hazard List• LCA-(various) LSST Camera Hazard Reports• LCA-11664 LSST Camera Operating and Support Hazard Analysis• Institutional Safety Implementation PlansLSST Safety Council Camera Review • Bremerton, WA • 2015





Institutional Safety


• Many U.S. institutions; one in France • Project is managed as a single unit • All subsystem managers report to the project manager follow the

plans, standards, and processes laid out thereby • Key institutional personnel support subsystem managers and

leads by implement local environment, safety and health regulations and policies


Safety Roles and Responsibilities


• Camera Project Manager– Overall project authority: project planning and scope; performance, and quality

objectives on schedule within the approved budget; ES&H procedure compliance, and for coordinating project activities; staffing plans and actions.

• Safety Officer– Reports to CPM; influences design for human and hardware safety minimizing

the overall hazard level of the camera design and operations• Systems Integration Manager

– Provides technical leadership; directs subsystem development teams through requirement development and tracking; assures subsystems are compatible; oversees, from the Camera side, all aspects of camera-telescope and camera-data management interfaces, as well as flow-down of LSST system-level requirements.

• Subsystems Managers

• Institutional Safety Officers


Safety Roles and Responsibilities


• Subsystems Managers– Camera Subsystem Managers or their designee are responsible for

integrating the safety and quality assurance programs into their subsystem; (supported by the QA Manager, Camera Safety Officer and Systems Integration Manager, but are ultimately responsible for their subsystem

• Institutional Safety Officers – Support institutional line management to ensure that the institutional

plans and processes are implemented on Camera work at that institution. The Institutional Safety Officer may report directly to the line management responsible for Camera work at the institution or to higher-level ES&H officials, depending on the organization’s management structure. They are also responsible to work with the Camera SE to ensure that local processes meet camera requirements, as well as with institutional subject matter experts, building and area managers, and other personnel that support or oversee Camera work at the institution.


Staffing

• Institutional Safety Officers/Managers

Institution Safety Manager/Point of Contact

LSST Project Chuck Gessner

LSST Camera Joe Kenny

Observatory (Chile) Sandra Romero

BNL Matthew Rumore

IN2P3 Pierre Karst

Harvard Peter Doherty

UPENN Rick Van Berg



System Safety Engineering

• SYSTEM SAFETY - The application of engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to achieve mishap risk as low as reasonably practicable (to an acceptable level) within the constraints of operational effectiveness, suitability, time, and cost

• MISHAP RISK- A measure of the expected loss from a given hazard or group of hazards. Risk is the combined expression of loss severity and probability



Safety During Integration and Testing

• Focus of LSST Camera Operating and Support Hazard Analysis (LCA-11661)

• Engineering controls built into systems and work areas• Direct application of SLAC work planning and control requirements:

– All work is planned (using SOPs, ATAs, JSAs, WIPs, and/or eTravelers)

– All work is authorized (by worker’s functional supervisor or lead collaborator

– All work is released (by SLAC Area Manager) • Administrative controls

– Training– Access control– Signage

• Daily, direct oversight by Camera safety personnel



Review Process

• Camera Safety Officer formally assessed subsystems at Camera design reviews reviews, viz.: Cryostat FDR, Corner- and Science-Raft Pre-CD-2, Auxiliary Electronics Pre-CD-2, DAQ and CCR FDR, Filter Exchange System FDR, Filter FDR, I&T PDR.

• Subject matter experts are engaged for assessment of mitigations for special hazards. – Oxygen deficiency– Hoisting and rigging– Pressure safety

• Independent entities review Camera safety at various levels of detail during– CD-2 and CD-3 (Directors’ and DOE Reviews)– Camera FDR– LSST Safety Council

• ES&H expertise will be similarly enlisted during upcoming reviews



A safety analysis has been completed on the L3 Assembly and approved by LLNL, SLAC and the LSST Project Office



Summary


• Documentation for the ways and means of implementing safety across the project are in place and in effect

• Dedicated personnel are employed across the project to assure adherence to those documents

• Integration and testing will progress safely• The use of the Camera Safety Officer and independent reviewers in the

Camera design and planning is extensive and adds greatly to ES&H• The Camera team is duly prepared to safely begin assembly

End of Presentation
