17
LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

LST SAFETY

INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004

FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

Page 2: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY ISSUES

• Safety Plan

• Design Safety Issues

• FHA Addendum

• Environmental/Emissions

Page 3: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY PLAN

• October 2003, Review Committee - Recommendation #3“Third is the need for more formal safety planning. The circumstances of the installation in 2004 and 2005 present a significant risk of accident. Early, detailed, safety planning is needed to ensure adequate personnel training and full-time coverage by safety officers on all shifts for the duration of the installation. With appropriate advance planning, training, and staffing, the work can be conducted safely.”

Page 4: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY PLAN

• Safety Team and Coverage• Safety Training• Job Hazard Analysis• Tailgate Safety Meetings • Safety on agenda for Daily Operations

Meetings• Safety Coordination - Fire Safety, Security,

OHP, PRCS, ETC.• Management Safety Walkthroughs

Page 5: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY TEAM

• Team Leader is Sandy Pearson• Members include Frank O’Neill and Joe

Kenny - Four additional team members are needed for the day and swing shifts

• Candidates have been identified• Time commitment is two 8 hour shifts

per week• BaBar Operators will be considered for

Graveyard shift safety coverage

Page 6: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY TRAINING

• Accident Prevention Talk & Walk

• IR-2 Safety Briefings will be conducted every day the first week

• IR-2 Safety Briefings will be conducted weekly thereafter - Wednesday at 1:30 at IR-2 Cornelius - and as required

Page 7: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS

• Rigging Procedures and Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) have been completed for special purpose handling fixtures

• Safety Review of these procedures and JHA has been accomplished

Page 8: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

TAILGATE SAFETY MEETINGS

• Will be conducted at the start of each shift and as necessary at the beginning of new activity and operations

• Review of the JHA with the crews is an essential part of the tailgate safety meeting

Page 9: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

DAILY OPERATIONS MEETINGS

• Safety on Agenda at Daily Operations Meetings

• A Safety Team Member will attend and communicate safety issues and concerns

Page 10: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

SAFETY COORDINATION

• Fire Safety

• Security

• OHP

• PRCS

Page 11: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

MANAGEMENT SAFETY WALKTHROUGHS

• This is under consideration

Page 12: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

DESIGN SAFETY ISSUES

• Flammable Component of Gas Mixture

• Electrical/Electronics Final Design

Page 13: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

GAS MIXTURE

• 3 components: Argon, Isobutane, and CO2 • Similar Gas Mixtures utilized on other

Detectors– SLD: 2.5% Ar, 9.5% isobutane, 88% CO2

– ZEUS: 3% Ar, 8% isobutane, 89% CO2

• Final decision on mixture pending• Nonflammable mixture will be utilized• Hughes Associates providing consulting

services for evaluation of mixtures

Page 14: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

0 5 10 15 20

7.5

8

8.5

9

9.5

10

Compare_errors_vs_flammable_region_II

Per Cent Argon (proposed limit, 9.7% isobutane at 0% argon)Runnable Region (9.41 % isobutane at 0% argon)Runnable Region + 1.0% driftExample Point (8.65% isobutane, 3% argon)

Per Cent Argon

%CO2=100-%Ar-%Isobutane

All Operational Settings Are To Be Below the Blue Line

Page 15: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

GAS MIXTURE STATUS

• Hughes Associates Inc. reviewed and approved the gas system proposal

• Fire Protection Safety Committee review completed April 6, 2004

• Hazardous Experimental Equipment Committee (HEEC) review completed April 12, 2004 – final walkthrough before start-up is required

Page 16: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

FIRE HAZARD ANALYSIS (FHA) ADDENDUM

• Hughes Associates Inc. is currently working on the second Addendum to the FHA

• Recently received a description of the LST Electrical/Electronics – an issue to be addressed is do we need to provide VESDA coverage

• Ed Budnick has committed to delivering the Addendum by the end of June

• Submit to the DOE for Information Only

Page 17: LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY

• Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) issues SLAC a permit for discharge of VOCs – BaBar emissions may approach the limits

of the permit– Monitoring the emission levels and

coordination with the SLAC Environmental Protection Department is ongoing