Upload
curtis-wilson
View
227
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 1/61
1 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
OFDMA in LTE (UTRAN Long TermEvolution)
Oulu
9th August, 2007
Antt i Toskala, Harr i Holma
Nokia Siemens Networks
For internal use
2 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Outline
• UTRAN LTE background
• 3GPP schedule
• LTE Physical Layer
• LTE Layer 2/3
• LTE Architecture
• LTE Network Algorithms
• LTE Network Performance
• Benchmarking with HSPA and WiMAX
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 2/61
For internal use
3 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
2H/2007
F E A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y
W O R K I T E M
2H/2005 1H/2006 2H/2006
Japan
1H/2007
Multiple Access
Decision
RAN/CN
functional splitFeasibility study
closed
Work Item
(feature level)
Start
Work tasks and
work plan
approved
Stage 2
approved
Stage 3
approved
(WG1-3)
Stage 3
approved
(WG4)
• End 2004: 3GPP workshop on UTRAN Long Term Evolution• March 2005 Start of the study
•12/2005 Multiple Access & 03/2006 (BTS/Core functional split)
• September 2006 close of the study item & approval of the work items anddetailed work plan
• There will be some delay, 1st realistic target is December 2007
• To be part of Release 8 3GPP specifications
Background of LTE
For internal use
4 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
3GPP Schedule – Latest Update
3GPP TSG RAN#36 plenary (end May) revised the schedule
• Physical Layer Specifications (RAN WG1) due approval still inSeptember
• Obviously they will not be 100% ready, but anyway for approval
• Protocol specifications generally will not be for approval inSeptember, earliest in December (RRC, S1, X2) but this schedulemay not necessary hold
– Would be approval take place in December, anyway closing of all details inprotocol side shall take to mid 2008. Especially RRC specs will bechallenging based on WCDMA learnings (and schedule v.s. resources v.s.work remaining calculations…)
• Please follow the NSN/Nokia 3GPP std. raports for updates onschedules
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 3/61
For internal use
5 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
UTRA Long Term Evolution
WCDMA
384 kbps DL
384 kbps UL
RTT ~150ms
CS/PS
HSDPA
14.4 Mbps peak
RTT ~100ms
PS
HSUPA
5.7 Mbps peak
RTT ~50ms
PS
Towards
4G
2009/102007/82005/62003/4
UTRA evolution : WCDMA: 5MHz
UTRA Long term evolution: Up 20
MHz BW
Approx. year of roll-out
UL improvements
To WCDMA
DL improvements
To WCDMA
New radio accesstechnique
EUTRA
100 Mbps peak DL
50 Mbbps peak UL
RTT ~10ms
PS
3GPP Rel.99/4 Release 5 Release 6 Release 7-8 Release9?
2011/12
Control and user plane
latency improvements
Capacity enhancements
HSPA evolution
28/42 Mbps peak DL
11 Mbps peak UL
For internal use
6 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
General Requirements for UTRAN Evolution
Feasibility study started in 3GPP for UTRAN Long Term Evolution with thefollowing requirements
• Packet switched domain optimized
• Server UE round trip time below 30 ms and access delay below 300 ms
• Peak rates uplink/downlink 50/100 Mbps
• Ensure good level of mobility and security
• Improve terminal power efficiency
• Frequency allocation flexibility with 1.25/2.5, 5, 10, 15 and 20 MHz allocations,possibility to deploy adjacent to WCDMA
• WCDMA evolution work on-going to continue with full speed
Operators are also requiring higher radio capacity
• Depending on the case 3-4 times higher capacity expected than withRelease 6 HSDPA/HSUPA reference case
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 4/61
For internal use
7 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Multiple Access Selection
Due to the large bandwidth, up to 20 MHz, and up to 100 Mbps data rates ->something more than just a new modulation or larger chip rate was needed
3GPP decided in the feasibility study to use as multiple access OFDMA (Downlink)and SC-FDMA (Uplink)
3GPP considered several alternatives
• OFDMA
• SC-FDMA
• And use of Multicarrier WCDMA
• For the downlink the choise was clear, while for the uplink a bit more debate tooplace between OFDMA and SC-FDMA as especially companies with WiMAXbackground preferred similarity with WiMAX.
– SC-FDMA was also the Nokia preference (see later slides on PAR issues)
8 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
OFDMA in LTE Downlink
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 5/61
For internal use
9 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
OFDM benefits
Superior performance in frequency selective fading channels
Complexity of base-band receiver is much lower
Good spectral properties and handling if multiple bandwidths
Link adaptation and frequency domain scheduling
offer high potential for throughput etc gain
Other cell interference can be effectively reduced byInterference Rejection Combining (IRC).
For internal use
10 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Bandwidth Scalability
1.4 MHz
3.0 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
20 MHz
FFT size
128
256
512
1024
2048
Bandwidth
Scalable bandwidth 1.4 – 20 MHz using different number of subcarriers and different FFTsize
Large bandwidth provides high data rates
Small bandwidth allows simpler spectrum refarming, e.g. 450 MHz and 900 MHz
Narrow spectrum refarming
High data rates
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 6/61
For internal use
11 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
DL air interface technology
OFDM-based DL air interface
Frequency bandwidth options are 1.4 MHz,3.0 MHz, 5 MHz, 10 MHz, 15 MHz and 20MHz
Each BW has fundamentally similar features
• Symbol is parametrised equally
• 15 kHz subcarrier spacing
• Clock is 2N (8x) multiple of 3.84 MHz
• FFT scales as a power of two
3GPP is discussion also alternativeparameters for the broadcast use (MobileTV case
Up to 20 MHz
For internal use
12 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
OFDM Transmitter/Receiver Chain
OFDM is used in various systems,like:
• DVB-T
• DVB-H
• WLAN (IEEE family)
– Including WiMax
Key component is theinverse discrete Fourier
transform
• IDFT/IFFT
• Moving between time andfrequecy domainrepresentation
frequency
Transmitter
total radio BW (eg. 20 MHz)
Modulator Cyclic
Extension
Remove
CyclicExtension
Equaliser
Bits
frequency
Receiver total radio BW (eg. 20 MHz)
Modulator
Bits
IFFTIFFTSerial to
Parallel …
IFFTSerial to
ParallelFFT …
Demodulator
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 7/61
For internal use
13 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
OFDM symbol fundamentals
At 20 MHz BW, FFT=2048OFDM symbol length 66.68 µs
• Robust for mobile radio channel withthe use of gurard internal/cyclic prefix(see next slide)
• Overheads of guard interval andchannel spacing are not excessive
6 OFDM data symbols per one 0.5 mssub-frame
• Additionally one symbol for pilotsequence (& TS), Shared Controlsignalling and occasionally for systeminfo
copy of Np last samples
cyclicprefix
OFDM symbol, TsymFFT length NFFT
GuardInterval
symbol window
OFDM symbol beforeCP insertion
delayspread
cyclicprefix
symbol window
cyclicprefix
OFDM symbol beforeCP insertion
OFDM symbol, T symFFT length N FFT
GuardInterval
OFDM symbol at the transmitter
OFDM symbol at the receiver
For internal use
14 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Cyclic Prefix – Preventing Intersymbol Interference
(ISI)Having the cyclic prefix longer than the channel multpath delayspread prevents ISI
The part of the signal waveform itself is copied to be used and cyclicprefix (instead of a break in transmission)
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 8/61
For internal use
15 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Maintaining sub-carriers orthogonal
The OFDMA refers indeed to the Orthogonal FDMA as theparameters for the sub-carrier are chosen to that neighboring sub-carriers have zero value the desired sampling point for any sub-carrier Sampling point
for sub-carrier
Zero value for
other sub-carriers
15 kHz
For internal use
16 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
OFDMA Transmitter
Windowing is needed for pulse shaping for meeting the spectrum masks
• This is even more needed if some clipping is applied (typical) in the transmitter as thatmakes the spectrum wider compared to the ideal OFDM spectrum
• Compare to pulse shaping filters with WCDMA
The length of the filters will “eat” part of the time from cyclic prefix
Serial
to
Parallel
X0
XN-1
x0
xN-1
IFFT
Parallel
to
SerialAdd
CP
WindowingDACRF Section
Input
Symbols
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 9/61
For internal use
17 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
OFDM challenges
Peak-to-average ratio of the transmitted signal (crest factor)
Sensitivity to frequency error • This addressed by having sufficiently large sub-carrier spacing• In case of too large frequency error, the sub-carriers start to
interfere each others
For internal use
18 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Why not to use OFDM in the uplink?
The transmitted OFDM signal shou ld be seen as a sum of sinusoid
This is not suited for a highly linear, power efficient terminal amplifier
The envelope needs to be with as low Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR) as
possible.
Power Amplifier sees this!
IFFT …
Frequency domain
QAM modulated inputs
Time domain signal
FFT …
Frequency domain
QAM modulated outputs
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 10/61
19 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
SC-FDMA in LTE Uplink
For internal use
20 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
SC-FDMA with CP
Sending only one symbol at the time results to low PAR envelope
• In 3GPP Cubic Metric being considered as it represent better the deviceamplifier impact than PAR
This allows to benefit from the modulation PAR/CM properties in devices
This is important for small size devices aiming for up to 24 dBm TX power.
frequency
Transmitter
Receiver
total radio BW (eg. 20 MHz)
Modulator Cyclic
Extension
RemoveCyclic
Extension
FFTMMSEEqualiser
IFFT Demodulator Bits
Bits
frequency
Transmitter
Receiver
total radio BW (eg. 20 MHz)
Modulator Cyclic
Extension
RemoveCyclic
Extension
FFTMMSEEqualiser
IFFT Demodulator Bits
Bits
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4CM vs rolloff with different modulations
rolloff
C
M [ d
B ]
SC pi/2-BPSK
SC QPSK
SC 16-QAM
OFDM pi/2-BPSK
OFDM QPSK
OFDM 16-QAM
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 11/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 12/61
23 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Physical Layer Structures
For internal use
24 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Physical Layer Structure – Frame Structure
The slot structure (allocation with 1 ms sub-frame resolution) has been designed tofacilitate short round trip time
With FDD only the generic frame structure is intended to be used, with TDD bothare possible while the alternative is only intended for the TD/SCDMA co-existancecase.
#0#0 #1#1 #2#2 #3#3 #19#19
One slot, T slot = 15360×T s = 0.5 ms
One radio frame, T f = 307200×T s=10 ms
#18#18
One subframe
#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
DwPTS
Guard period
UpPTS
One radio frame, Tf = 307200×Ts
Generic
Alternative one for TD/SCDMA co-existence
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 13/61
For internal use
25 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Physical Layer Structure – Frame Structure (2)
Data SymbolsControl Symbols
DL Sub-carriers
0.5 ms Slot
1 ms Sub-frame
10 ms Radio Frame
…0 1 2 3 191817
For internal use
26 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Physical Layer Structure – Downlink
The following downlink physical channels are defined
• Physical Downlink Shared Channel, PDSCH
– This is intended for the user data (compare with HS-PDSCH in WCDMA)
• Physical Downlink Control Channel, PDCCH
• Physical Broadcast Channel, PBCH
• Physical Control Format Indicator Channel, PCFICH
• Physical Multicast Channel, PMCH
symb N
ConfigurationGeneric frame struct ure Alternative frame structu re
Normal cyclic prefix kHz15=∆ f 7 9
kHz15=∆ f 6 8Extended cyclic prefix
kHz5.7=∆ f 3 4
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 14/61
For internal use
27 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Physical Layer Structure – Downlink ReferenceSignal
1
1
1
Not used for
transmission on
this antenna port
Reference
signals on this
antenna port
Resource elementR0
R0
R0
R0
R0R0
R0
R0
reference signal: R1reference signal:
R1 R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
subframe xsubframe x
1RB
Needed for receiver channel estimation (like CPICH in WCDMA)
Sufficient distribution in time and frequency domain needed.
For internal use
28 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Downlink channels for data & control (PDCCH/PDSCH)
Downlink control information in the few first symbols to indicate which resources(resource blocks) are allocated for a given user (UL&DL!)
Respectively the uplink resources to be used are informed by eNode B
• Under consideration whether uplink allocations could be for longer periods aswell
Data SymbolsControl Symbols
DL
UL
Uplink Allocations
User 1 Data & Control
User 2 Data & Control
Frequency
Sub-carriers
0.5 ms Sub-frame
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 15/61
For internal use
29 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Subframe structure
Short cyclic prefix
Long cyclic prefix
Symbol 66.68 µs
Copy
= Cyclic prefix
= Data
5.21 µs
16.67 µs
Subframe length is 1 ms for all bandwidths• 0.5 ms is the slot length (recent 3GPP decision)
Subframe carries 6 symbols with short cyclic prefix or 7 symbolswith long prefix
For internal use
30 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Resource Blocks
Resource allocation can be done with Resource blocks
Resource block has bandwidth of 180 kHz, equal to 12 subcarriers
10 MHz = 50 resource blocks = 600 subcarriers (subject to 3GPP confirmation)
Resource block180 kHz = 12subcarriers
Subcarrier 15 kHz
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 16/61
For internal use
31 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Synchronization Channel SynCH in Downlink
Sycnchronization Channel SynCh is allocated in the 1.25-MHz blockin the middle of downlink bandwidth
SynCH is located in the last OFDM symbol of every 4th subframe
#0
Frame Tf = 10 ms
#19
1.25 MHz
Subframe 0.5 ms
For internal use
32 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Subcarrier Modulation
QPSK
2 bits/symbol
16QAM
4 bits/symbol
64QAM
6 bits/symbol
In both directions QPSK, 16QAM or 64QAM are used, depending on the channel(expected that control channels to be using mainly QPSK)
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 17/61
For internal use
33 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Downlink Physical Layer Parameters
1.4 MHz 3.0 MHz 5 MHz 10 MHz 15 MHz 20 MHz
Subframe (TTI) 1 ms
Subcarrier 15 kHz
FFT 128 256 512 1024 1536 2048
Subcarriers1 72+1 180+1 300+1 600+1 900+1 1200+1
1DC subcarrier included
Symbols per frame 7 with Short CP and 6 with Long CP
Cyclic prefix 5.21 µs with Short CP and 16.67 µs with Long CP
For internal use
34 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Uplink Subframe Structure
In the uplink direction the QAM modulation is sending only onesymbol at the time.
Momentary data rate (controlled by the eNode B scheduler)depends on the allocated transmission bandwidth (and CP lenght)
LB#1
Subframe Tsf = 0.5 ms
= Cyclic prefix
= Long block data
= Short block dta
LB#2 LB#3 LB#4 LB#5 LB#6
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 18/61
For internal use
35 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Random Access Channel (RACH)
The RACH operation uses 1.08 MHz bandwidthSimilar ramping as with WCDMA (due inaccuracy of absolute powerlevel setting in devices)
307200×Ts
TPRE TGTTCP
PreambleCP
0.1 ms 0.1 ms0.8 ms
36 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Physical Layer Procedures
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 19/61
For internal use
37 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Uplink Power Control
LTE uplink is using also closed loop power control, rate slower than
with WCDMA• This needed due reuse 1 and to limit uplink receiver dynamic
range
Power control commands connection with scheduling grants
Control over power spectral density, not absolute power
-> Thus power is changing based on the BW used
frequency
frequency
Power per Hz unchanged
TTI 1
TTI 2
For internal use
38 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Uplink Power Control (cont)
Cell wide overload indicator (OI) exchanged over X2 between
nodes on a slow basis,
• Expected average delay is in the order or 20 ms, number of bits is
still for discussion in 3GPP
UEeNode BServing eNode B
Overload indicator
Scheduling and TPC
Uplink data
X2
A neigboring eNodeB
I n t e r f e r e n c e
To AGW
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 20/61
For internal use
39 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Timing Advance
When UE has previously established time alignment:
• TA update rate: on a per-need basis, 2 Hz is fast enough also for high speed UEs• Granularity of TA signalling: 0.52us
•What to base the TA command on: – When the UE has data to transmit, implementation issue in NodeB (e.g. based on sounding
RS, CQI)
– If the UE has no data to transmit, FFS whether e.g. periodic signals such as sounding RS maybe ordered
• How to transmit TA in the DL: TBD whether L1L2, in-band (MAC or RRC)
When no TA is established or UE is out of sync
• TA command is based on RACH preamble
• Initial TA will have to cover the full cell range, part of RACH procedure
UEeNode B
Timing Advance
Uplink data or RACH
For internal use
40 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Measurements
• measurements from LTE on LTE (intra-LTE):
–UE measurements:
▪ RSRP (reference signal received power ),
▪ E-UTRA carrier RSSI (received signal strength indicator),
▪ RSRQ (reference signal received quality)
–eNode B measurement:
▪ DL reference signal transmit power
• measurements from LTE on other systems:
–UTRA FDD: CPICH RSCP, carrier RSSI, CPICH Ec/No
–GSM : GSM Carrier RSSI
–UTRA TDD: P-CCPCH RSCP ,carrier RSSI
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 21/61
For internal use
41 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Measurements – Carrier RSSI & RSRQ
E-UTRA Carrier Received Signal Strength Indicator, comprises the totalreceived wideband power observed by the UE from all sources, including co-channel serving and non-serving cells, adjacent channel interference, thermalnoise etc.
Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ) is defined as the ratio N×RSRP/(E-UTRA carrier RSSI), where N is the number of RB’s of the E-UTRA carrier RSSImeasurement bandwidth. The measurements in the numerator anddenominator shall be made over the same set of resource blocks.
• 3GPP has open issues on these e.g. measurement bandwidth onRSSI
• New Measurements may still be added
For internal use
42 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Measurements – RSRP & DL Reference Signal
Transmitted Power
• Downlink reference signal transmit power is determined for a considered
cell as the linear average over the power contributions (in [W]) of the resourceelements that carry cell-specific reference signals which are transmitted by theeNode B within its operating system bandwidth.
Reference signal received power (RSRP) is determined for a considered cell asthe linear average over the power contributions (in [W]) of the resourceelements that carry cell-specific reference signals within the consideredmeasurement frequency bandwidth.If receiver diversity is in use by the UE, the reported value shall be equivalent tothe linear average of the power values of all diversity branches.
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 22/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 23/61
For internal use
45 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE layer 2 Structure
Segm. ARQ
Multiplexing UE1
Segm. ARQ
...
HARQ
Multiplexing UEn
HARQ
BCCH PCCH
Scheduling / Priority Handling
Logical Channels
Transport Channels
MAC
RLC
Radio Bearers
Segm. ARQ
Segm. ARQ
PDCP
ROHC ROHC ROHC ROHC
SAE Bearers
Security Security Security Security
...
Header
CompressionsCiphering
For internal use
46 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Layer 3 (RRC)
The Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling is also terminated in eNode B(compared to RNC in WCDMA)
One of the enablers for the flat model is the lack of macro-diversity
• Not need for RNC like functional element -> everything radio related can beterminated in eNode B
RRC to handle: Broadcast, Paging, RRC connection management, Mobility
managements and UE measurements …
Control Plane LTE protocol stacks
RRC
UE
RLC
MAC
Physical Layer
RRC
eNode B
RLC
MAC
Physical Layer
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 24/61
47 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
LTE Archi tecture
For internal use
48 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Architecture Evolution
GGSN
Node B
HSPA R6
SGSN
LTE R8
RANeNode B
SAE
Gateway
Only user plane elements shown!
RNC
The LTE architecture isflat, only two nodes forthe user data
• See later slides fordetails
This is similar that isenabled in I-HSPA whendeployed together withthe one tunnel solution
Also the ciphering is ineNode B
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 25/61
For internal use
49 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Architecture Overview
RB Control
ConnectionMobility Cont .
eNBMeasurement
Configuration &Provision
DynamicResource Allocation
(Scheduler )
RRC
PHY
Mobility Management
SAE BearerControl
MAC
PDCP
Inter Cell RRM
Radio Admission
Control
RLC
eNode BMME
Idle Mode Handling
S1-MME
S1-U
Serving SAE GW PDN SAE GW
Local Mobility Anchor Point for LTE Handover
Mobility Anchoring for GSM/WCDMA Mobility
Legal Interception
Policy Enforcement
Packet Filtering
EUTRAN CORE NETWORK
Hard Handover facilitate a decentralized network architecturewithout a centralized Radio Network Controller (RNC).
Radio Access related control functionality and protocol terminationon the network side is located in the eNB:
For internal use
50 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Architecture – Control Plane
The interface betweenRAN & Core network iscalled S1 interface
Interface betweeneNodeB is named X2
S1_MME between
MME& eNodeB
X2RRC
UE
RLC
MAC
Physical Layer
RRC
eNode B
RLC
MAC
Physical Layer
RRC
eNode B
RLC
MAC
Physical Layer MME
S1_MME
S1_MME
NAS NAS
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 26/61
For internal use
51 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE/SAE Architecture (Radio and Core)
PCRF
MME
SGSNIu-ps
HSS
IP Networks
Data
ControlUTRAN
S1_MME
Serving SAE
Gateway
eNode B
S1_U
PDN SAE
Gateway
S11
SGI
Operator Services(IMS etc…)
Radio
52 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Protocols and QoS
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 27/61
For internal use
53 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Protocol Layers
CMAC
MAC-u SAP
RRC SAP
PHY SAP
Physical layer
Radio link layer
IP layer
Radio network layer
PDCP
IP
RRC
RLC
PHY
MAC
MAC-c SAP
CPHY
MM&X
PHY:• FEC encoding/decoding• Error detection• Support of HARQ• Modulation/demodulation• Frequency and time synchronization• Power control, antenna diversity, MIMO
MAC:• Mapping & mux of logical channels totransport channels• Traffic volume measurement reporting• Hybrid-ARQ• Priority handling
RLC:• Retransmission control (ARQ)• Segmentation• Flow control towards aGW
RRC:• Broadcast of system information• Radio connection & Radio bearers
• Paging, handovers, QoS management,radio measurement control
For internal use
54 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
ARQ & HARQ Retransmissions
LTE provides both
• ARQ at RLC layer and
• H-ARQ at MAC layer
RLC retransmissions
• Acknowledged mode (AM) withretransmissions
• Transparent mode (TM) used for e.g.BCCH
H-ARQ: N-process Stop and Wait based on ACK/NACK
• DL: Asynchronous retransmission withadaptive transmission parameters
• UL: Synchronous retransmission with fixedor adaptive transmission parameters
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 28/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 29/61
57 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
LTE Peak Bit Rates
For internal use
58 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Resource bloc 6 15 25 50 100
Subcarriers 72 180 300 600 1200
Modulation coding 1.4 MHz 3.0 MHz 5.0 MHz 10 MHz 20 MHz
QPSK 1/2 Single stream 0.8 2.1 3.6 7.2 14.3
16QAM 1/2 Single stream 1.7 4.3 7.2 14.3 28.716QAM 3/4 Single stream 2.6 6.4 10.7 21.5 43.0
64QAM 3/4 Single stream 3.9 9.7 16.1 32.2 64.5
64QAM 4/4 Single stream 5.1 12.9 21.5 43.0 86.0
64QAM 3/4 2x2 MIMO 7.7 19.3 32.2 64.5 129.0
64QAM 4/4 2x2 MIMO 10.3 25.8 43.0 86.0 172.0
64QAM 4/4 4x4 MIMO 20.6 51.6 86.0 172.0 343.9
Downlink Peak Bit Rate
• 2x2 MIMO
• 64QAM
• Pilot symbols 1 out of 14
• Reference symbol overhead 7.7%
•Result : 172 Mbps in 20 MHz and 86 Mbps in 10 MHz
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 30/61
For internal use
59 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Resource bloc 6 15 25 50 100
Subcarriers 72 180 300 600 1200
Modulation coding 1.4 MHz 3.0 MHz 5.0 MHz 10 MHz 20 MHz
QPSK 1/2 Single stream 0.8 2.1 3.6 7.2 14.3
16QAM 1/2 Single stream 1.7 4.3 7.2 14.3 28.7
16QAM 3/4 Single stream 2.6 6.4 10.7 21.5 43.0
16QAM 4/4 Single stream 3.4 8.6 14.3 28.7 57.3
64QAM 3/4 Single stream 3.9 9.7 16.1 32.2 64.5
64QAM 4/4 Single stream 5.1 12.9 21.5 43.0 86.0
64QAM 4/4 V-MIMO (cell) 10.3 25.8 43.0 86.0 172.0
Uplink Peak Bit Rate
• Single stream transmission• 16QAM
• Pilot symbols 1 out of 14
• 57 Mbps in 20 MHz and 28 Mbps in 10 MHz
For internal use
60 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
2000 2005 20100,01
0,1
1
10
100
1.000
Year of user availability
U s e r d a t a r a t e [ M b p s ]
ADSL
1-3 Mbps
ADSL
6-8 Mbps
ADSL2+
16-20 Mbps
VDSL2
25-50 Mbps
GPON
100 Mbps
EDGE
0,236 Mbps
WCDMA
0,384 Mbps
HSDPA
3.6-7.2 Mbps
NG-PON
Wireline
Wireless
Wireless Can Provide Broadband Access – But Wireline will
Always be Faster • Similar evolution track in wireline and wireless
• Wireline has and will have >30x higher peak rate while wireless is faster to deployand provides mobility
• Wireless can provide >1 Mbps broadband data rates in practice, which isgenerally enough for everything else except IP TV
HSDPA1.8 Mbps
WiMAX
HSPA+
LTE
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 31/61
For internal use
61 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Transport Solution Must Support High Data Rates
= Very high data rate solutions beyond 100 Mbps
= High data rate solutions beyond 10 Mbps= Voice and low data rate solutions
Ethernet
E1
SHDSL.bis
ADSL2+
LTE
Ethernet
GPON
DSM L3
VDSL2 LTE
Peak
Data rate Downstream / Downlink Upstream / Uplink
WiMAX
HSPA WiMAX
HSPA
WCDMA
GPON
10 G
1 G
100 M
10 M
1 M
0,1 M
WCDMA
EDGEevolution
EDGE
DSM L3
VDSL2
ADSL2+
ADSL
SHDSL.bis
E1
ADSL
E1
EDGEEDGE
EDGEevolution
62 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
LTE Link Budgets
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 32/61
For internal use
63 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Link Budgets – Uplink 64 kbps
UplinkData rate [kbps] 64
Transmitter - UE
a Max tx power [dBm] 24.0
b Tx antenna gain [dBi] 0.0
c Body loss [dB] 0.0
d EIRP [dBm] 24.0 =a+b-c
Receiver - Node B
e Node B noise figure [dB] 2.0
f Thermal noise [dBm] -118.4 =k (Boltzmann)*T(290 K)*B(360kHz)
g Receiver noise floor [dBm] -116.4 =e+f
h SINR [dB] -7.0 From simulations
i Receiver sensitivity [dBm] -123.4 =g+h
h Interference margin [dB] 2.0k Cable loss [dB] 2.0
l Rx antenna gain [dBi] 18.0
m MHA gain [dB] 2.0
Maximum path loss 163.4 =d-i-j-k+l-m
• At least similar link budget as HSPA 64 kbps or GSM voice
– Differences in fast fade margin, macro diversity and interference margin• Clearly better link budget than WiMAX
24 dBm terminal
2 resource blocksfor 64 kbps
2 dB interference
margin
For internal use
64 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Link Budgets – Downlink 1 Mbps
DownlinkData rate [kbps] 1024
Transmitter - Node B
a HS-DSCH power [dBm] 46.0
b Tx antenna gain [dBi ] 18.0
c Cable loss [dB] 2.0
d EIRP [dBm] 62.0 =a+b-c
Receiver - UE
e UE noise figure [dB] 7.0
f Thermal noise [dBm] -104.5 =k (Boltzmann)*T(290 K)*B(9.0MHz)
g Receiver noise floor [dBm] -97.5 =e+f
h SINR [dB] -10.0 From simulationsi Receiver sensitivity [dBm] -107.5 =g+h
j Interference margin [dB] 3.0
k Control channel overhead [dB] 1.0
l Rx antenna gain [dBi] 0.0
m Body loss [dB] 0.0
Maximum path loss 165.5 =d-i-j-k+l-m
• Downlink 1 Mbps link budget better than uplink 64 kbps
40 W BTS
2 dB cable loss(could be avoidedwith RF head)
10 MHz bandwidth
3 dB interferencemargin
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 33/61
For internal use
65 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Uplink Link Budget Difference Between WiMAX andHSPA/LTE
HSPA/LTE FDD WiMAX TDD
(1) Mobile transmit power 24 dBm 23 dBm
(2) TDD structure Continuoustransmission
Duty cycle 18/49 =−4.2 dB
1.0 dB
4.2 dB
(3) Pilot overhead 14% = −0.7 dB 33%1 = −1.7 dB 1.0 dB
1PUSC assumed. AMC would reduce the overhead, but AMC + MIMO is not defined in WiMAXforum profiles 1-22Stronger 1/3 rate coding and incremental redundancy in HSUPA/LTE main reasons3Including macro diversity gain and interference margin in HSUPA for 64 kbps4One subchannel and 1 dB interference margin assumed5We typically assume HSPA/LTE 162-163 dB and WiMAX 154 dB
Total 8.6 dB5
(4) Other difference insensitivity2
−121 dBm(HSUPA3)
−113.4 dBm4-4.2-1.0 =−118.6 dBm
2.4 dB
For internal use
66 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE Cell Sizes
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
900 MHz 1800 MHz 2100 MHz 2500 MHz
km
Urban indoor
Suburban indoor
Rural outdoor
Rural outdoor fixed
Okumura-Hata parameters Urban indoor Suburban
in do or Rur al o utdo or Rural outdoor
fixed
Base station antenna height [m] 30 50 80 80
Mobile antenna height [m] 1.5 1.5 1.5 5
Mobile antenna gain [dBi] 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0Slow fad ing s tandard deviat ion [dB] 8 .0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Location probability 95 % 95 % 95 % 95 %
Correction factor [dB] 0 -5 -15 -15
Indoor loss [dB] 20 15 0 0
Slow fading margin [dB] 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 34/61
67 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Link Adaptation and Packet Scheduling
For internal use
68 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Fast Link adaptation in Downlink Based on CQI
• Modulation schemes: QPSK,16QAM, 64QAM
• Code rate: Turbo 1/6 − 5/6
• Fine adjustment of link adaptation isdone by using H-ARQ, which can beseen in the smoothening out of thespectral efficiency curve.
• Multi-stream MIMO is used to furtherboost the Peak-data-rate (not shownin this slide)
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
G-factor [dB]
S p e c t r a l e f f i c i e n c y b / s / H z
QPSK 1/6,no H-ARQ
QPSK 1/3,no H-ARQ
QPSK 1/2,no H-ARQ
QPSK 2/3,no H-ARQ
16QAM 1/2,no H-ARQ
16QAM 2/3,no H-ARQ
16QAM 3/4,no H-ARQ
64QAM 2/3,no H-ARQ
64QAM 4/5,no H-ARQ
LA no H-ARQLA with H-ARQ
G-Factor basically means SINR
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 35/61
For internal use
69 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Fast Multiplexing in Time and Frequency domain
12-subcarriers
• A “resource block” consists of 12
consecutive sub-carriers ~ 180kHz fora number (N) consecutive OFDM
symbols within two Sub-frames.
1 radio frame = 10ms
1 sub-frame = 0.5ms (10ms/20)6 or 7 OFDM symbols
Subframe pair= 2 sub-frames
1 OFDM symbol ~ 71/83 usincl. CP (short/long)
User B
User C
User D
User A
User D
User A
F-D packet scheduler allocation
User #1
User #2
RB index
Frequency
Use
r B
User C
User D
User A
User D
User A
Allocation
Information infirst 3 OFDM
symbols.
For internal use
70 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
UE2
Channel qualityinfo (CQI)
Data
Data
UE1
Multi-user selection diversity (give shared channel to “the best” users)
USER 1 Es/N0
USER 2 Es/N0
Scheduled user
Scheduling and allocationcan utilize information on the
instantaneous channelconditions of each user.
time
Time Domain Proport ional Fair Schedul ing
Channel qualityinfo (CQI)
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 36/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 37/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 38/61
For internal use
75 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Localized vs. Distr ibuted Transmission (2)
Localized transmission
▲Supports Frequency domain packet scheduling▲High flexibility in RRM
▲Work well together with interference coordination
▼No frequency diversity (or frequency diversity by retransmission)
▼Performance is sensitive to high mobile speed
Distributed transmission
▲Maximize frequency diversity
▲Potentially less control signaling overhead
▲Potentially work better with interference averaging techniques
▲Performance is less sensitive to high mobile Speed
▼Does not support Frequency domain packet scheduling
▼Low flexibility in RRM
Localized transmission has theoretically higher performance potential thandistributed but is more complex to get optimal performance
For internal use
76 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Gain from Transmit Diversity / MIMO
The gain of 2-antenna BTStransmission with TxAA
• 1-rx UE: 28 %
• 2-rx UE: 17 %+17%
+28%
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 39/61
For internal use
77 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Uplink spectral efficiency
0.00.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2 RX antennas 4 RX antennas
b p s / H z / c e l l
Proportional fair
Virtual MIMO
Uplink Virtual-MIMO Gains3GPP Case 1 with 20 UE/cell
V-MIMO gain<10% with 2-rx
BTS
V-MIMO gains arelarge with 4-rx. V-
MIMO is a must with 4-rx BTS
78 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Spectral Efficiency
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 40/61
For internal use
79 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Downlink Summary
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
UTRA baseline E-UTRA 2x2
b p s / H z / c e l l
Alcatel-Lucent
Ericsson
Huawei
InterDigital
Motorola
NEC
Nortel
Nokia-Siemens
Qualcomm
SamsungTexax Instruments
Average
HSPA
0.6 bps
LTE 1.8
bps
• Downlink spectral efficiency shown to be 3 x HSPA R6 (=UTRA baseline), which
was the target of LTE
For internal use
80 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Uplink Summary
• Uplink spectral efficiency shown to be >2 x HSPA R6, which was the target ofLTE
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
UTRA baseline E-UTRA 1x2
b p s / H z / c e l l
Alcatel-Lucent
Ericsson
Huawei
InterDigital
Motorola
NEC
Nortel
Nokia-Siemens
Qualcomm
Samsung
Texax Instruments
Average
HSPA 0.33
bps
LTE 0.75
bps
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 41/61
For internal use
81 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Key Features for LTE Downlink Spectral EfficiencyCompared to HSPA R6
Inter-cell interference rejection combining orcancellation
MIMO = combined use of 2 tx and 2 rxantennas
Frequency domain packet scheduling
+10%
+20%
+40%
Total gain up to 3.1x
OFDM with frequency domain equalization +20..70%
Compared to single antenna BTStx and 2-rx terminal
Not feasible in HSPA due tocdma modulation
Possible also in HSPA but better performance in OFDM solution
Due to orthogonality
• 3GPP R7 brings equalizer and MIMO also to HSPA
82 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Voice (VoIP) in LTE
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 42/61
For internal use
83 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
VoIP Considerations
• Voice codec selection: AMR, IETF (G.xxx, iLBC), Proprietary• IP header compression
• QoS
• Keep alive signals
• SIP signalling
• Resource allocation – Fully persistent allocation
– Talk spurt based persistent allocation
– Semi-persistent allocation (similar to HS-SCCH less HSDPA)
– Dynamic scheduling
• Packet scheduling
• Mobility – Also to GSM and to UMTS
For internal use
84 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Downlink VoIP Capacity Results
Estimated Capacity for VoIP with Different Bandwidths
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1.25 5 10
Bandwidth [MHz]
C a p a c i t y [ U s e r s / c e l l ]
7.95 kbps AMR (estimated)
12.2 kbps AMR (estimated)
Baseline capacity figure for different bandwidths, 3 km/h (no real control channel limitations)
• 1.25 MHz ~ 60 users/cell @ 7.95 AMR ~ 50 users/cell @ 12.2 AMR (estimated)
• 5 MHz ~ 230 users/cell @ 7.95 AMR (estimated) ~ 190 users/cell @ 12.2 AMR
• 10 MHz ~ 550 users/cell @ 7.95 AMR ~ 440 users/cell @ 12.2 AMR (estimated)
Capacity difference of 7.95 kbps AMR and 12.2 kbps AMR: The 7.95 AMR gives roughly 10-20% bettercapacity (used when calculating the estimations above)
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 43/61
For internal use
85 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
GSMEFR
GSM AMR
GSMDFCA
WCDMACS voice
HSPA R7 LTE
U s e r p e r M H z
Voice Spectral Efficiency Evolution from GSM to LTE
• 20 x more users per MHz with 3GPP LTE than with GSM EFR!• VoIP is the way to go for future voice in mobile systems
CS voice VoIP
86 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
LTE Handovers
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 44/61
For internal use
87 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Key Agreements so far in 3GPP Regarding Handovers
• Stage 2 work closed in June 2007 in TSG-RAN• Stage 3 work starting with detailed procedures, message naming, message
contents
• 3GPP LTE handover principles
– Lossless
▪ Packets are forwarded from the source to the target
– Network-controlled
▪ Target cell is selected by the network, not by the UE
▪ Active mode mobility (Handover control) in E-UTRAN, Evolved Packet Core involved only inHandover Completion after preparation and execution phases
– UE-assisted
▪ Measurements are made and reported by the UE to the network
▪ The network may request the UE to prioritize some cells to measure
– Late path switch
▪ Only once the handover is successful, EPC is involved
For internal use
88 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Inter eNB handover
MME
UE
Serving
SAE GW
old eNB
MME
UE
Serving
SAE GW
new eNB
GTP tunnel
GTP signaling
Radio frames
X2 signaling
S1 signaling
MME
UE
Serving
SAE GW
old eNB old eNB
Before Handover Handover preparation
and HO command After Hand over
MME
UE
Serving
SAE GW
old eNBnew eNB
UE access to target, and
new S1 taken into use
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 45/61
For internal use
89 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
P r e p ar a t i on
Handover Preparation (1)
• The UE context within the source eNBcontains information regarding mobilityrestrictions (e.g. roaming)
– source eNB knows where UE can go
• The source eNB configures the UEmeasurement procedures
– UE continuously identifies and measuresneighbour cells
• UE is triggered to send MEASUREMENTREPORT to the source eNB
– Event triggered or periodic
• Source eNB makes decision based onMEASUREMENT REPORT and RRMinformation to hand off UE
– Channel conditions, load and serviceinformation included
Src: 3GPPTS 36.300 V8.0.0 (2007-03)
For internal use
90 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Handover Preparation (2)
P r e p ar a t i on
• The source eNB issues a HANDOVERREQUEST to the target eNB passingnecessary information to prepare the HOat the target side
• Target eNB performs admission controland configures the required resourcesaccording to the received SAE bearer QoSinformation
• Target eNB sends the HANDOVERREQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE to thesource eNB
• Target eNB is ready to welcome the UEand the source eNB can issue the HOcommand
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 46/61
For internal use
91 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Handover Execution
• The source eNB generates the
HANDOVER COMMAND towards the UE• The UE receives the HANDOVER
COMMAND
• UE leaves the source cell and moves to thetarget cell
• UE performs the final DL synchronisation totarget eNB and then starts acquiring ULtiming advance
– DL pre-synchronisation is obtained duringcell identification and measurements prior tomeasurement reporting
E x e c u t i on
Src: 3GPPTS 36.300 V8.0.0 (2007-03)
For internal use
92 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Handover Completion
• The EPC is informed by the target eNB thatthe UE has changed location with aHANDOVER COMPLETE message
• The UPE switches the downlink data path tothe target side and can release any U-planeand transport network resources towards thesource eNB
• The EPC confirms the HANDOVERCOMPLETE message with the HANDOVERCOMPLETE ACK message
• By sending RELEASE RESOURCE thetarget eNB informs success of HO to sourceeNB and triggers the release of resources
• Upon reception of the RELEASERESOURCE message, the source eNB canrelease radio and C-plane related resourcesassociated to the UE context
C om pl e t i on
Src: 3GPPTS 36.300 V8.0.0 (2007-03)
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 47/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 48/61
95 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Differences Between WiMAX Release 1 and LTE
For internal use
96 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Physical layer design – Basic parameters
Higher uplink coverage
LTE: CM = 1.0 dB
WiMAX: CM = 3.3 dB
Lower cyclic prefixoverhead
LTE: Overhead = 7 %
WiMAX: Overhead = 11 %
Item LTE WiMAX
Downlink MA • OFDMA • OFDMA
• SC-FDMA • OFDMA
• Cubic metric = 1.0dB • Cubic metric = 3.3 dB
Duplex • FDD, TDD • TDD
• 1.4 (FDD) • 5, 10, 8.75 MHz (band class 1)
• 1.6 (TDD) • 3.5, 5, 10 MHz (band class 2)
• 3.0 and/or 3.2 MHz • 5, 10 MHz (band class 3)
• 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz • 5, 7, 10 MHz (classes 4 and 5)
FFT sizes • 128, 256, 512, 1024,
1536, 2048 • 512, 1024
• 10.9 kHz (5 & 10 MHz ch)
• 7.8 kHz (3.5 & 7 MHz ch)
• 9.8 kHz (8.75 MHz ch)
• 91 us (5 & 10 MHz ch)
• 128 us (3.5 & 7 MHz ch)
• 102 us (8.75 MHz ch)
• 4.7 us (normal CP) • 11.4 us (5 & 10 MHz ch)
• 16.7 us (extended CP) • 16.0 us (3.5 & 7 MHz ch)
• 12.8 us (8.75 MHz ch)
• 7 % (normal CP)
• 20 % (extended CP)• 11 %
Uplink MA
Channel
bandwidth
Subcarrier
spacing • 15.0 kHz (unicast)
Useful symbol
length
• 67 us
Cyclic prefix
length
Cyclic prefix
overhead
Higher maximum BW
LTE: Up to 2x20 MHz
WiMAX: Up to 1x10 MHz1
1Bandwidths up to 2x20 MHz, FDD, and variable CP are supported in 802.16e
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 49/61
For internal use
97 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Physical layer design – Channel coding
CRC
Code blocksegmentation
Channel coding
Rate matching
Channel
interleaving
Code blockconcatenation
HARQ
Higher coding performancewithlong packets
LTE: Code block size < 6144 bits
WiMAX: Code block size < 480 bits
Higher turbo codingperformance
LTE: PCCC
WiMAX: Duo binary codes
Support for incrementalredundancy
LTE: Chase & IR supported
WiMAX: Only Chase supported
Finer granularity of code rates
LTE: Flexible rate-matching
WiMAX: Fixed set of code rates
For internal use
98 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Physical layer design – MIMO
OFDM
Mapper
OFDM signal
generationLayer
Mapper
Scrambling
Precoding
Modulation
Mapper
Modulation
Mapper
OFDM
Mapper
OFDM signal
generationScrambling
code words layers antenna ports
Number of TXantennas
LTE: Max 4
WiMAX: Max 2
Support for closed-loop MIMO
LTE: Codebook-based linearprecoding with rank adaptation
WiMAX: Not supported
Support for multicodeword transmission
LTE: Max 2 codewords
WiMAX: Not supported
Supportfor DownlinkMU-MIMO
LTE: Supported
WiMAX: Not supported
Support for uplink TX diversity
LTE: Closed loop TX antennaselection
WiMAX: Not supported
NOTE: Most of the ”non supported” WiMAXMIMO features are supported in 802.16e
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 50/61
For internal use
99 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Physical layer design – Reference signal overhead
ASSUMPTIONS: The DL overhead includes pilots + sync at 10 MHz
bandwidth. The UL overhead includes pilots only(no sounding).
Lower DL RS overhead
LTE: 10.2 % (2 TX)
WiMAX: 17.5 % (PUSC)
Lower UL RS overhead
LTE: 14.3 %
WiMAX: 33.3 % (PUSC)
Uplink PUSC
Lower UL RS overhead
LTE: 14.3 %
WiMAX: 11.1 % (AMC)
1 TX 2 TX PUSC AMC
Downlink 5.5 10.2 17.5 14.5
Uplink 14.3 - 33.3 11.1
LTE WiMAXLink
For internal use
100 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Radio link layer design – Protocol architecture
CRLC
MAC-uSAP
RRC SAP
PHYSAP
RLC-uSAP
NAS_SEC
IP
RRC
RLC
PHY
MAC
RLC-cSAP
MAC-cSAP
CPHY
NAS
NAS_SEC-c SAP
PDCPSAP
CMAC
PDCP
CPDCP
WiMAX LTE
More advancedspecification methodology
LTE: Clear logical model (SAPs), formal message definitions (ASN.1 tools), easy protocol extendibility
WiMAX: Logical model missing, message encodings manually specified, possible dead-ends in extendibility
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 51/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 52/61
For internal use
103 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Radio link layer design – User/control plane latency
LTE Wi MAX
User-plane latency
0 % HARQ3.5 ms 9.5 ms
User-plane latency
30 % HARQ5.0 ms 12.5 ms
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 13 14 15 16
BS <-> MME/ASN-GW del ay [m s]
T o t a l C - p l a n e d e l a y [ m s ]
LTE
WiMAX
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 13 14 15 16
BS <-> MME/ASN-GW del ay [m s]
T o t a l C - p l a n e d e l a y [ m s ]
LTE
WiMAX
Lower dependency to theBS<->MME delay
LTE: C-p delay = 50 - 80 ms
WiMAX: C-p delay = 50 - 140 ms
In case the BS<->ASN-GW delay is
kept low enough, the 3GPPrequirementsfor C-plane delay (100ms) arealso fulfilledin WiMAX,
Lower U-plane delay due toshorter radio frame
LTE: U-p delay = 3.5 – 5.0 ms
WiMAX: U-p delay = 5.0 – 12.5 ms
The evaluation methodologyis based on the
3GPP latencystudy
For internal use
104 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Conclusions (1/2)
Physical layer design
• Major differences
– Higher maximum transmission bandwidth in LTE
– Frequency division duplexing supported in LTE
– More advanced MIMO support in LTE
– More power efficient uplink multiple access in LTE
– Lower reference signal overhead in LTE
• Minor differences
– More flexible CP design in LTE
– More advanced HARQ support in LTE
– Larger maximum code block size in LTE – More advanced forward error correction scheme in WiMAX
– More flexible adaptation of the resource allocation messages in WiMAX
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 53/61
For internal use
105 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Conclusions (2/2)
Link layer design• Major differences
– More optimized header structure for small payloads in LTE
– Significantly lower resource allocation overhead for VoIP in LTE
• Minor differences
– More advanced spefication methodology
Latencies
• Major differences
– No major differences identified
• Minor differences
– Lower user-plane latency due to shorter TTI in LTE
– Less dependency on the transmission delay of the S1 interface in LTE
106 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
LTELive over the Air Presentation
Singapore, 2007
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 54/61
For internal use
107 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
HDTV video „ live over the air“ via LTE and HSDPA
HDTV video stream
LTE
HSDPA
A i r I n t er f a c e
H
O
For internal use
108 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Core
NGMN demonstrator – Multiple standards, one mobility
management under one control
One Core
Video stream
(HDTV quali ty)
MIMO
IMS-client
(video
surveillance)
Gi
Gateway/
router
IPv6
IPv6
IPv6
IPv6
IPv6
e-NBTerminal
screen
IuB
IPv6
First live NGMN air interface – with applications and interworking with
legacy 3G system: service continuity in one equipment
RRH
PBMM = Policy Based Mobility Management
RRH = Remote Radio Head
Services
Videoapplication
(IMS-controlled
video supervision)
Videoapplication
(Real time videostreaming – HDTV)
Acc ess
RNC/SGSN/
GGSN
IMS
(Core nodes
and AS)
PBMM
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 55/61
For internal use
109 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Ericsson Planned Frequency Variants
For internal use
110 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Huawei Schedule
LTE in
RAN12.0
Q1/2010
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 56/61
111 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
For internal use
Broadband Wireless Benchmarking
For internal use
112 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Link Level Performance Bounded by Shannon
• Link performance similar in HSPA, WiMAX and LTE in AWGN channel
• All three systems use similar modulation and Turbo encoding
• All cases approaching the Shannon limit
HSDPA vs. WIMAX vs . LTE in AWGN (1-tx BTS, 2-rx UE)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
G-Factor [dB]
S p e c t r a l e f f i c i e n c y [ b p s / H z ]
Shannon(0,83; 1,6)
Shannon(0,71; 1,6)
LTE
WiMAX
HSDPA
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 57/61
For internal use
113 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
LTE has Highest Bit Rates with Largest Bandwidth – HSPA R7/R8 and WiMAX have Similar Peak Bit Rates
HSPA R7 WiMAX TDD1 LTE FDD
11.5 Mbps
4.1 Mbps 7 Mbps
-
8.3 Mbps
29 Mbps- 16.6 Mbps
58 Mbps
1Downlink:uplink ratio 29:182Downlink with 64QAM3Uplink with 16QAM
Uplink3
HSPA R8 WiMAX TDD
1
LTE FDD
2x3.5 (1x7) MHz - 28 Mbps -
2x5 (1x10) MHz
-
40 Mbps 43 Mbps
2x10 (1x20) MHz - 80 Mbps 86 Mbps
Downlink 2x2MIMO
2
= typical bandwidth
2x2.5 (1x5) MHz
43 Mbps
20 Mbps 21 Mbps
- 5.5 Mbps -
2x20 MHz - - 173 Mbps
2x3.5 (1x7) MHz
2x5 (1x10) MHz
2x10 (1x20) MHz
2x2.5 (1x5) MHz
2x20 MHz
-
14 Mbps
-
HSPA R6
5.7 Mbps
-
-
HSPA R6
-
-
-
14 Mbps
-
-
-
For internal use
114 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Suburban indoor
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
LTE900
LTE2100
LTE2500 FDD
WiMAX 2500 TDD
WiMAX 3400 TDD
km
Uplink
Downlink
Cell Range gets Shorter at Higher Frequency and wi th
TDD
Assumptions:• Suburban area• 50 m BTS antenna• 15 dB indoor loss
• 95% location probability• Correction factor -5 dB• 1.5 m terminal antenna height
• WiMAX has shorter cell range due to TDD duplexing and higher frequency
• Outdoor fixed antennas can be used to improve the link budget for fixed wirelesssolution
8 x more sites
required than withHSPA2100
Downlink: 1 MbpsUplink: 64 kbps
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 58/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 59/61
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 60/61
For internal use
119 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
HSPA, WiMAX and Flash-OFDM Offerings in Finland
Digita Flash-OFDMLocal phone
company WiMAX Elisa HSDPA
Max 1 Mbps
Max 1 Mbps
Max 2 Mbps
For internal use
120 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Spectrum Defines Technology Choices
Licenced FDD
band
Licenced FDD
band
Licenced TDD
band
Licenced TDD
band
Unlicenced
TDD band
Unlicenced
TDD band
HSPA + later
LTE FDD
HSPA + later
LTE FDD
WiMAX + later
LTE TDD
WiMAX + later
LTE TDD
WiFiWiFi
900180021002500
23002500 (mid band)
3500
24005400
FrequenciesSpectrum Maintechnology
• Combined WiMAX + UMTS provides access to more spectrum =more capacity = more subscribers
8/10/2019 LTE Internal Training Course (1)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lte-internal-training-course-1 61/61
For internal use
121 © Nokia Siemens Networks HH + AT/ 9th August 2007
Technology Choice is also Defined by Current Networkand Voice Strategy
GSM/WCDMAdeployed?
UMTS bandavailable?
Want CSvoice?
YesYes
WCDMA/HSPA/LTE
NoNo (VoIP)
No GSM bandrefarmingpossible?
Yes
WiMAX (later LTE TDD)
No
2.5 GHz or3.5 GHz
available?
Yes
No
Yes
Reference Material
WCDMA 3rd editionJuly 2004
HSPAApril 2006
WCDMA 4th editionSeptember 2007
100 new pages about
MBMS, HSPA evolution
and LTE