1
PATIENT MATERIAL All records in which a diagnosis of micrognathia had been recorded in the medical records section of the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1926 and 1957, and additional cases through January 1960 brought to our attention by members of the pediatric department, were reviewed. At the outset, it should be noted that in only a minority of the records was there a definite statement as to whether glossoptosis was present or not. However, a history of recurrent episodes of cyanosis, usually relieved by changing the infant from the supine to the prone position, was considered sufficiently typical of glossoptosis to warrant inclusion in this series, when accompanied by presence of the other criteria of the syndrome. Furthermore, it was found that micrognathia and glossoptosis not infrequently occurred in association with palatine anomalies other than the classic cleft palate (such as a high, arched palate, or palate ogivale, absent soft palate, or bifid uvula). Thus, our criteria for acceptance of a case in this series consisted of the following: micrognathia; a cleft or abnormal palate; glossoptosis or a history of cyanotic and choking spells suggestive of glossoptosis. The records were reviewed with emphasis on the following aspects. Palate RESULTS OF ANALYSIS The patients are divided into three groups with regards to the palate. I. Micrognathia with cleft palate, 25 cases. II. Micrognathia plus other abnormality of the palate, 10 cases. III. Micrognathia with history and findings suggestive of the syndrome but palate inadequately described, 4 cases. Tongue Glossoptosis was present in 24 cases, the tongue

Documentlv

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

nh

Citation preview

Page 1: Documentlv

PATIENT MATERIALAll records in which a diagnosis of micrognathia

had been recorded in the medicalrecords section of the Johns Hopkins Hospitalbetween 1926 and 1957, and additional casesthrough January 1960 brought to our attentionby members of the pediatric department, werereviewed. At the outset, it should be noted thatin only a minority of the records was there adefinite statement as to whether glossoptosiswas present or not. However, a history of recurrentepisodes of cyanosis, usually relievedby changing the infant from the supine to theprone position, was considered sufficiently typicalof glossoptosis to warrant inclusion in thisseries, when accompanied by presence of theother criteria of the syndrome. Furthermore, itwas found that micrognathia and glossoptosisnot infrequently occurred in association withpalatine anomalies other than the classic cleftpalate (such as a high, arched palate, orpalate ogivale, absent soft palate, or bifiduvula). Thus, our criteria for acceptance of acase in this series consisted of the following:micrognathia; a cleft or abnormal palate;glossoptosis or a history of cyanotic and chokingspells suggestive of glossoptosis. The recordswere reviewed with emphasis on thefollowing aspects.PalateRESULTS OF ANALYSISThe patients are divided into three groupswith regards to the palate.I. Micrognathia with cleft palate, 25cases.II. Micrognathia plus other abnormalityof the palate, 10 cases.III. Micrognathia with history and findingssuggestive of the syndrome but palateinadequately described, 4 cases.TongueGlossoptosis was present in 24 cases, thetongue