Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
April 28, 2015
M A N A G I N G G L O B A L L I Q U I D I T Y
MNAFP 33rd Annual Conference
S T
R I C
T L
Y
P R
I V
A T
E
A N
D
C O
N F
I D
E N
T I A
L
Adrian Perez, CTP, CertICM
Liquidity Solutions
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
English_General
J.P. Morgan, JPMorgan, JPMorgan Chase and Chase are marketing name for certain businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries worldwide (collectively,
“JPMC”). Products or services, including those referred to herein, may be marketed and/or provided by commercial banks such as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., securities
or other non-banking affiliates such as J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. or other JPMC entities. JPMC contact persons may be employees or officers of any of the foregoing
entities and the terms "J.P. Morgan", “JPMorgan”, "JPMorgan Chase" and “Chase” if and as used herein include as applicable all such employees or officers and/or
entities irrespective of marketing name(s) used. Anything herein to the contrary, nothing in this presentation is intended to or shall be deemed to constitute a solicitation
by JPMC of any product or service the solicitation of which by the JPMC personnel providing and discussing this presentation with the Company would be unlawful under
any applicable United States, state, local or foreign law or regulation.
This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. JPMorgan believes the information contained in this material to
be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. The investments and strategies discussed herein may not be suitable for all investors. This material is not
intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Please consult your own tax, legal, accounting or
investment advisor concerning such matters.
Not all products and services are available in all geographic areas. Eligibility for particular products and services is subject to final determination by JPMorgan and or its
affiliates/subsidiaries. This presentation does not constitute a commitment by any JPMC entity to extend or arrange credit or to provide any other products or services.
The investments and strategies discussed herein may not be suitable for all investors. All services are subject to applicable laws and regulations and services terms. Any
proposal is subject to JPMorgan applicable internal and regulatory approvals and notifications, and therefore JPMorgan reserves the right to withdraw at any time.
Notwithstanding anything in this presentation to the contrary, the statements in this presentation are not intended to be legally binding. Any products, services, terms or
other matters described in this presentation (other than in respect of confidentiality) are subject to the terms of separate legally binding documentation and/or are subject
to change without notice.
© 2015 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All Rights Reserved. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC.
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Overview
Global Liquidity Management Considerations
Managing Global Liquidity
Various exogenous factors, including an extended period of low interest rates and a dynamic regulatory environment, have
complicated the role of treasury teams. External pressures have prompted treasury teams to re-examine their liquidity structures
and investment policies.
Three pillars of effective liquidity management
Visibility
Control
Optimization
Basic techniques
Cash Concentration
Notional Pooling
Hybrids
Basel III impact on liquidity products/structures and new
product development
1
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Optimization
Optimizing liquidity requires innovative measures across various functions
Visibility
Visibility over cash positions is critical
to efficiently manage funding and
investment needs for any organization
Control
Access and control over cash flows
and balances enable ease of
deployment across the Company
Self funding and investment vehicles can then be leveraged to optimize
yields on balances depending on amount, currency, duration and location
Automated end of day investment of excess cash subject to pre-defined
parameters can keep cash fully employed
Three-step
Process for
Optimizing
Liquidity
3
2
1
2
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Centralized Regionalized
Organizational structure can influence liquidity management strategy
Regional staff, ERP/TWS and
pooling structures
Shared services for AP/AR,
investments, borrowing, FX
Reporting line into HQ
HQ managed; central FX,
investments, borrowing
In-house-bank (IHB)
Payment factory
Single ERP/TWS
Shared service centers
RTC, etc
Local staff
In-country P&L
Matrix reporting
(local and HQ)
Disparate ERP/TWS
Decentralized
What are your liquidity objectives?
Centralize cash for increased visibility and control
Enhance efficiency through fully automated processes
Reduce interest charges on bank credit
Retain balance ownership with operating companies
Prevent co-mingling of cash across legal entities
Maintain operating business with local banking partners
Improve FX management across currencies
Improve returns on excess cash
Increase ease of investing
3
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Improved Risk Management Reduced Credit Cost
Improved Investment Returns Increased Visibility & Control
Ensures right amount of liquidity is in the right place at the
right time
Improves performance of subsidiaries through centrally
managing borrowing/lending rates
Automated rules can ensure subsidiary funding needs are
met on just-in-time/ intraday basis
Manage sovereign risk through concentrating funds in
regional structure
Improve operational risk through automating transfer of
funds across subsidiaries
Eliminate or reduce external borrowings
Negotiate credit facility centrally with global/regional
banking partner
Fund shortfalls through cheaper sources of credit (e.g.
Commercial paper)
Reduced idle and un-invested cash
Higher yield through centrally managing cash surplus
Enhanced cash flow forecasting
Increased flexibility on investments (e.g. class,
counterparty, tenor)
Acct C
USD 0
Acct A
USD 0
Acct B
USD 0
Header
+1000
+ USD 2000
Interest on Header
Account = 1000*2% = +$20
Benefit of Sweeping = +$80
- USD 4000
+ USD 3000
Cash Concentration Illustration
Credit Interest: 2%1
Debit Interest: 4%
1 Rates are for illustrative purposes only
Physical Cash Concentration – Potential benefits
4
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Improved Investment Returns Increased Visibility & Efficiency
Improved Risk Management Reduced Credit Cost
Legal entities retain bank accounts and balances
No lost availability or transfer costs
Interest apportionment performed centrally and
automatically
Reduced administration of intercompany loans
Reduced counterparty credit exposure to banks and
restricting it to banks approved by treasury
Retained separation of balances by legal entity
Eliminating local borrowing facilities
Minimizes debit interest payment
Reducing the overall usage of funding facilities
Reduced idle and un-invested cash
Higher yield through centrally managing cash surplus
Enhanced cash flow forecasting
Increased flexibility on investments (e.g. class,
counterparty, tenor)
Notional Pooling Illustration
Interest applied to the Pool:
Net Pool Position = $1000
Account = 1000*2% = +$20
Benefit of Sweeping = +$80
Acct C Acct A Acct B
Acct C Acct A Acct B
+ USD 2000 - USD 4000 + USD 3000
Credit Interest: 2%1
Debit Interest: 4%
Notional movement
of funds
1 Rates are for illustrative purposes only
Notional Pooling – Potential benefits
5
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Understanding Physical Cash Concentration vs. Notional Pooling
Physical Cash Concentration Notional Pooling
Solutions Physically sweeps balances from multiple
accounts into a master account
Notionally aggregating all account balances for net
pool position
No physical movement of funds
Location
Within single country or cross-border
Within banking partner network or multi-bank
where available
Within single country
Within banking partner network
Currency Single currency structure Single currency structure or Multi-currency structure
Benefits
Ease of optimization for investment options
across subsidiaries
Leverage group funding to cover deficit positions
with surplus cash from other accounts
Enhance control over cash position of the group via
central pooling accounts, without creating inter-
company loans.
Retain local autonomy on the participating entities
Maintain access to underlying currencies, no FX
conversion
Consideration
Creates intercompany loans between
participating entities and header entity
Transfer pricing, tax expense business tax, etc
Participants provide guarantee/ incur joint and
several liability
Participants must be incorporated in jurisdiction
where there is positive legal opinion on
enforceability of set-off and several liability
Tax treatment unclear and may require extensive
validation
Availability Widely available except where currency
restrictions apply Restricted in many jurisdictions
6
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Advantages
Illustration
Overlay Structures
Description
UK
Local Bank
Account
FR
Local Bank
Account
DE
Local Bank
Account
Overlay Bank
London
In-country accounts
May provide greater visibility and control
Similar benefits to physical cash concentration
Allows your company to retain in-country, local bank relationships, while simultaneously optimizing liquidity management
May helps reduce financial costs by concentrating excess balances into a single consolidated position
Consolidates regional liquidity without interrupting local operations
Sweeping typically done through SWIFT messaging
Local, in-country operating accounts act independently and
manage day-to-day activity
Prior to close of business, funds are automatically swept to
“Overlay Bank”
Sweeps can be made to a mirror account structure or to a
single account in the name of central treasury on a per
currency basis
Overlay Bank (e.g. EUR in London)
Overlay Bank
London
Overlay Bank
London
7
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Local regulations must be considered when deciding on a liquidity structure
Commercial
Impact Liquidity
Implications
Foreign
Currency
Exchange
Control
Double
Treaty
Agreements Cost of
Operation
Tax
Implications
Transactions
between
resident &
non-resident
accounts
Cross-
border flow
of funds
8
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Impact of Current Environment on Banking Products
Stress of prolonged low interest rate environment
Need to utilize trapped cash
Regulations driving profound change in value of operating cash vis-á-vis
reserve cash or short-term investments
Continuing cost pressures and compressed margins
9
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
M A
N A
G E
M E
N T
1
0 1
A
N D
C
U R
R E
N T
M
A R
K E
T T
R E
N D
S
Interest Income
Bank Profitability 101
Basel III has impacted interest income by requiring more capital to be held in reserve
Customer deposits Loans to customers
Reserves
Interest Expense Net Interest Margin
Balance
Sheet
Income
Statement
Assets Liabilities
A bank’s basic profitability goal is to earn more interest on its book of loans than it pays in interest on deposits
9
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Map US Basel III Components
Bank for International Settlements (BIS) established in 1930; goal is to help central banks with monetary and financial stability. Their
head office is in Basel, Switzerland (see map below)
Developed by the BIS’s Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS); continually reformed over time
Currently on Basel III – finalized in 2010 by BCBS, G-20 endorsed in November 2010
Intention is to raise resiliency of banks and the global financial system
Reforms are interpreted and implemented differently across various countries
In the US, the regulations are referred to as ‘US Basel III’. In some cases, the US rules and capital requirements are more restrictive
Implementation of US Basel III will continue through 2019, but key regulations have already begun to take effect
Pillar 1 – Capital
Leverage
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) – 30 days
Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) – 1 year
Pillar 2 – Risk Management
Pillar 3 – Market Discipline
Basel History & Overview
History of the Basel Accords
Denmark
Austria France
Belgium
Netherlands
Luxembourg
Italy
Germany Czech
Republic
Geneva
Basel
Switzerland
Zurich
Basel I
1988
Basel II
2004
Basel II.5
2009
Basel III
2010
Liquidity
11
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Key Takeaways
Liquidity linked to operating services
Non-operating / Wholesale liquidity
For every $100MM in wholesale deposits:
All Institutions:
– 30 day run-off during a market event → 25%
– Required liquidity → $25MM
For every $100MM in deposits:
Corporates, Sovereigns, Central Banks
and Public Sector Entities (PSE):
– 30 day run-off during a market event → 40%
– Required liquidity → $40MM
Financial institution (FI) and correspondent banking
balances:
– 30 day run-off during a market event → 100%
– Required liquidity → $100MM
What are the key liquidity impacts of the Basel III framework?
Banks will carry significantly higher costs on non-operating balances vs. operating balances as the outflow assumptions will drive
the numerator in most cases.
There could be a disparity between how clients define operating balances and what the regulators will permit banks to
classify as operating balances.
Banks will likely channel wholesale / non-operating type funding to appropriate off–balance sheet vehicles, establish liquidity
programs and assess markets to transform the liquidity profile of the balance sheet.
Illustration of Liquidity ($MM)
25
40
100
75
60
100 100 100
WholesaleOperating
Non-OperatingNon-FI
Non-OperatingFI
Required Liquidity Deposits Available for Lending
12
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Liquidity Product Evolution
Global Earnings Credit Rate
Building upon the Earnings Credit Rate concept used in the
US, global banks are extending it to share excess earnings
credits across the globe to maximize the value of balances
May increase operating income and enhance operating
margin
May provide value for trapped balances
Global Liquidity Management Accounts
Banks offer different variations of accounts that essentially
reward stability of operating balances
Intraday use of funds does not impact balance value
May provide higher returns compared to short-term
investment alternatives
Aggregate global balances for higher yields without
comingling funds
13
M N A F P 3 3 R D A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E M A
N A
G I
N G
G
L O
B A
L
L I Q
U I D
I T
Y
Key takeaways
Fundamental requirements for a “Best-in-class” liquidity structure remain the same
Visibility and control of global cash helps optimize balances, but the benefits of an optimal liquidity structure transcend
beyond yield
“The only thing that is constant is change”
Various regulatory changes are having a profound impact on our industry which in turn may affect your liquidity structure and
investment policy
Leveraging your strategic banking partners is key
In addition to global reach and capabilities, choosing the right banking partner will become even more important to help you
navigate through this changing regulatory environment and mitigate risk
14