1
Grossman et al. JHEP06 (2000) 029 Jäger et al. JHEP05 (2013) 043 Everett et al. JHEP01 (2002) 022, Foster et al. PRB641 (2006) 452, Lunghi et al. JHEP 04 (2007) 058, Goto et al. PRD77 (2008) 095010 Blake et al. arXiv:1501.03309 arXiv:1501.03038 LHCb: JHEP05 (2013) 159 angle definitions as in LHCb JHEP 08 (2013) 131 angular fit region 124 signal events Becirevic et al. NPB854 (2012) 321 accurate at 5% level Kruger et al. PRD71 (2005) 094009 Becirevic et al. NPB854 (2012) 321 Adapted from Jäger and Camalich arXiv:1412.3183 BaBar PRD78 (2008) 071102, Belle PRD74 (2006) 111104 No deviations from SM: Becirevic et al. JHEP 08 (2012) 090 Tracking VELO PID Calorimeters Muon Martino Borsato [email protected] photon polarization M. Borsato on behalf of the LHCb collaboration very precise predictions photon polarization previous constraints

M. Borsato on behalf of the LHCb collaboration · Martino Borsato [email protected] photon polarization M. Borsato on behalf of the LHCb collaboration very precise predictions

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Grossman et al. JHEP06 (2000) 029Jäger et al. JHEP05 (2013) 043

    Everett et al. JHEP01 (2002) 022, Foster et al. PRB641 (2006) 452, Lunghi et al. JHEP 04 (2007) 058, Goto et al. PRD77 (2008) 095010

    Blake et al. arXiv:1501.03309

    arXiv:1501.03038

    LHCb: JHEP05 (2013) 159

    angle definitions as in LHCb JHEP 08 (2013) 131

    angular fit region

    124 signal events

    Becirevic et al. NPB854 (2012) 321

    accurate at 5% level

    Kruger et al. PRD71 (2005) 094009Becirevic et al. NPB854 (2012) 321

    Adapted from Jäger and Camalich arXiv:1412.3183

    BaBar PRD78 (2008) 071102, Belle PRD74 (2006) 111104

    No deviations from SM:

    Becirevic et al. JHEP 08 (2012) 090

    TrackingVELO PID Calorimeters Muon

    Martino Borsato [email protected]

    photon polarization

    M. Borsato on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

    very precise predictions

    photon polarization

    previous constraints

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/029http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)043http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/01/022http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/058http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.095010http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03309http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03038http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)159http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2013)131http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.09.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.094009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.09.004http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3183http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.071102http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.111104http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)090mailto:[email protected]

    Slide 1