M Ch11 Slope Stabilization

8/11/2019 M Ch11 Slope Stabilization

1/12

103L OW -V OLUME R OADS BMP S :

Chapter 11

Slope StaSlope StaSlope StaSlope StaSlope Sta bilizabilizabilizabilizabiliza tion andtion andtion andtion andtion andStaStaStaStaSta bility of bility of bility of bility of bility of Cuts and FCuts and FCuts and FCuts and FCuts and F illsillsillsillsills

T HE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLSare 1) to create space for the road templateand driving surface; 2) to balance material between the cut and fill; 3) to remain stable over time; 4) to not be a source of sediment; and 5) tominimize long-term costs. Landslides and failed roadcuts and fills can be a major source of sediment, theycan close the road or require major repairs, and theycan greatly increase road

maintenance costs ( Photo11.1 ). Vertical cut slopesshould not be used unless thecut is in rock or very wellcemented soil. Long-termstable cut slopes in most soilsand geographic areas aretypically made with about a1:1 or :1 (horizontal:vertical) slope ( Photo 11.2 ).Ideally, both cut and fill slopesshould be constructed so thatthey can be vegetated ( Photo11.3 ), but cut slopes in dense,sterile soils or rocky materialare often difficult to vegetate.

Fill slopes should be con-structed with a 1 1/2:1 or flat-

Construct cut and fill slopes that are flat enough to be stable over time and that can be revegetated.

Photo 11.1Photo 11.1Photo 11.1Photo 11.1Photo 11.1 Over-steep slopes, wet ares, or existing slide areas cancause instability problems for a road and increase repair andmaintanance costs, as well as sediment production.

ter slope. Over-steep fill slopes (steeper than a 1 1/2:1 slope), commonly formed by side-casting loosefill material, may continue to ravel with time, aredifficult to stabilize, and are subject to sliver fill fail-ures ( Photo 11.4 ). A rock fill can be stable with a 11/3:1 slope. Ideally, fills should be constructed witha 2:1 or flatter slope to promote growth of vegeta-tion and slope stability ( Photo 11.5 ). Terraces or


2/12

L OW -V OLUME R OADS BMP S : 104

Photo 11.2Photo 11.2Photo 11.2Photo 11.2Photo 11.2 Construct cut slopes at a 3/4:1 or flatter slopein most soils for long-termstability. In well-cemented soilsand rock, a 1/4:1 cut clope willusually be stable.

Photo 11.3Photo 11.3Photo 11.3Photo 11.3Photo 11.3 A well-stabilized cut slope, with about a 1:1 slope,that is well covered withvegetation.

Photo 11.4Photo 11.4Photo 11.4Photo 11.4Photo 11.4 Avoid loose, over-steep fill slopes (steeper than 11/5:1), particularly alongstreams and at drainagecrossings.


3/12


Photo 11.5Photo 11.5Photo 11.5Photo 11.5Photo 11.5 Construct fill slopes with a 1 1/2:1 or flatter slope (topromote vegetation growth) and stabilize the fill slope surface. Usebenches (terraces) on large fill slopes to intercept any flow of surface water.

benches are desirable on large fillslopes to break up the flow of sur-face water.

Table11.1 presents a range of commonly used cut and fill sloperatios appropriate for the soil androck types described. Also Figure11.1 and Figure 11.2 show typi-cal cut slope and fill slope designoptions, respectively, for varyingslope and site conditions. Note,however, that local conditions canvary greatly, so determination of stable slopes should be basedupon local experience and judg-ment. Groundwater is the major cause of slope failures.

Slope failures, or landslides,typically occur where a slope isover-steep, where fill material isnot compacted, or where cuts innatural soils encounter groundwa-ter or zones of weak material.Good road location can oftenavoid landslide areas and reduceslope failures. When failures dooccur, the slide area should be sta-

bilized by removing the slide ma-terial, flattening the slope, addingdrainage, or using structures, asdiscussed below. Figure 11.3shows some of the commoncauses of slope failures along withcommon solutions. Designs aretypically site specific and may re-quire input from geotechnical en-gineers and engineering geolo-gists. Failures that occur typicallyimpact road operations and can becostly to repair. Failures near streams and channel crossingshave an added risk of impact towater quality.

A wide range of slope stabili-zation measures is available to theengineer to solve slope stability

COMMON STABLE SLOPE RATIOSFOR VARYING SOIL/ROCK CONDITIONS

Soil/Rock Condition Slope Ratio (Hor:Vert)

Most rock :1 to :1

Very well cemented soils :1 to :1

Most in-place soils :1 to 1:1

Very fractured rock 1:1 to 1 :1

Loose coarse granular soils 1 :1

Heavy clay soils 2:1 to 3:1

Soft clay rich zones or 2:1 to 3:1wet seepage areas

Fills of most soils 1 :1 to 2:1

Fills of hard, angular rock 1 1/3:1

Low cuts and fills (


4/12


FFFFFigurigurigurigurigur e 11.1e 11.1e 11.1e 11.1e 11.1 Cut slope design options.

Use Full Bench Cuts When theGround Slopes Exceed +/- 60%

High CutTypically Steeper Where Stable

Typical Rock Cut Slopes:1 to :1

Typical Cut Slopes inMost Soils :1 to 1:1

Natural Ground

0-60% Ground slopes

60% +

: 1

1 : 1

: 1

: 1

Road

Road

Road Cut

Fill

: 1

t o 1 : 1

0 - 60%

Low CutCan be Steep

or Flatter

2 : 1

Use a Balanced Cut and Fill

Section for Most Constructionon Hill Slopes.

2 : 1 T y p

i c a l

a. Balanced Cut and Fill

b. Full Bench Cut

c. Through Cut


5/12


FFFFFigurigurigurigurigur e 11.2e 11.2e 11.2e 11.2e 11.2 Fill slope design options

a. Typical Fill Natural ground

0-40%Ground slope

40-60%

Typically60% +

Geogrid or geotextilereinforcement layers

Drain

Road

On ground where slopes exceed 40 - 45%, construct benches +/- 3 m wide or wide enoughfor excavation and compaction equipment.

Scarify and removeorganic material

Road

Road

T y p i c a l l y p l

a c e f i l l o

n

a 2 : 1 o r f l a t t e

r s l o p e.

L o n g f i

l l

s l o p e

1 : 1

1 1 / 2 : 1 T

y p i c a l

Road

0-40%

3 : 1

Slash

Slash

Fill material placed in layers . Uselifts 15-30 cm thick. Compact tospecified density or wheel rolleach layer.

Note: When possible, use a 2:1or flatter fill slope to promoterevegetation.

2 : 1

S h o r t f i l l s l o p e

Note: Side-cast fill materialonly on gentle slopes, awayfrom streams.

Reinforced fills are used onsteep ground as analternative to retainingstructures. The 1:1 (Over-steep) face usually requiresstabilization.

d. Through Fill

c. Reinforced Fill

b. Benched Slope Fill with Layer Placement


6/12


The Problem

Solutions

Oversteep (near vertical) cutslope Cut failure

Uncontrolledwater Fill failure in

oversteep or uncompactedfill material

Loosesidecast fillon a steepslope

FFFFFigurigurigurigurigur e 11.3e 11.3e 11.3e 11.3e 11.3 Slope problems and solutions with stabilization measures.

Cut slope laid back to a stable angle

Cut slopefailure

Rock buttresswith underdrain

Originalover-steepenedslope

Fill compacted in15-30 cm thick layers

Retaining structure

Note: This drawing shows avariety of slope stabilizationmeasures which can be used tostabilize cuts and fills.

Vegetation on fillslope surface,

preferably 2:1 or flatter

Subdrainage

Potential fillfailure surface

1 : 1

2 : 1


7/12


problems and cross an unstablearea. In most excavation and em-

bankment work, relatively flatslopes, good compaction, andadding needed drainage will typi-cally eliminate routine instability

problems ( Photo 11.6 ). Once afailure has occurred, the most ap-

propriate stabilization measurewill depend on site-specific con-ditions such as the size of the slide,soil type, road use, alignment con-straints, and the cause of the fail-ure. Here are a range of commonslope stabilization options appro-

priate for low-volume roads, pre-sented roughly from simplest andleast expensive, to the most com-

plex and expensive:

Simply remove the slidematerial.

Ramp over or align the roadaround the slide.

Revegetate the slope andadd spot stabilization (See

Photo 13.10 ).

Flatten or reconstruct the

slope.

Raise or lower the road levelto buttress the cut or removeweight from the slide,respectively.

Relocate the road to a newstable location.

Install slope drainage such as

deep cutoff trenches or

dewater with horizontaldrains.

Design and construct but-tresses ( Photo 11.7 ), retain-ing structures, or rock anchors.

Retaining structures are rela-tively expensive but necessary insteep areas to gain roadway spaceor to support the roadbed on asteep slope, rather than make alarge cut into the hillside. They canalso be used for slope stabiliza-tion. Figure 11.4 (a and b) pre-sents information on commontypes of retaining walls and simpledesign criteria for rock walls,where the base width is commonly0.7 times the wall height ( Photo11.8 ). Figure 11.4c presents com-mon gabion gravity wall designsand basket configurations for varying wall heights. Gabionstructures are very commonlyused for walls up to 6 meters high,

particularly because they use lo-cally available rock and are labor

intensive ( Photo 11.9 ).

Photo 11.6Photo 11.6Photo 11.6Photo 11.6Photo 11.6 Simple hand compaction behind a low rock wall. Com-paction is important behind any retaining structure or fill. It can beachieved by hand or, preferably, using equipment such as a wacker

or small compactor.

Photo 11.7Photo 11.7Photo 11.7Photo 11.7Photo 11.7 A drained rock buttress can be used to stabilize a cut slope failure area.


8/12


Concrete

a.a.a.a.a. Common Types of Retaining Structures.

HeadersStretcher

Crib Wall

Gabion Wall

Reinforced Soil Wall

FacingReinforced Soil

Brick or Masonry Rock

Reinforced Concrete

H" Piles

Road

Piles

Concrete with Counterforts

Counterfort

Keys

High Rock WallConfiguration

Low Rock Wall Configuration

bbbbb ..... Typical Rock Wall Construction.

: 1 toVertical

W i d t h ( W )

For H = 0.5 m, W = 0.2 mH = 1.0 m, W = 0.4 mH = 1.5 m, W = 0.7 mH = 2.0 m, W = 1.0 m

Rock

AggregateFill

Rock Height(H) 70 cm

H m a x =

5 m e

t e r s

1

2

0.7 H

0.3-0.5 m

Gravity Walls

Figure 11.4 Construction of various types of retaining structures. (Adapted from Gray & Leiser, 1982)


9/12


bbbbb ..... Standard design for Gabion Retaining Structures up to 20 feet in height (6 meters) with flat or sloping backfill.

No. of levels

No. of gabions

(per width)BH

1 3' 3" 3' 3" 1

2 6' 6" 4' 11" 1 1/2

3 9' 9" 6' 6" 2

4 13' 1" 8' 2" 2 1/2

5 16' 4" 9' 9" 3

6 19' 7" 11' 5" 3 1/2

Fill at 1 1/2:1 (face with steps)

6

B

1

H

4

2

1

5

6

3

1.5

H

20"

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

B

Flat Backfill (smooth face)

No of levels

No. of gabions

(per width)BH

1 3' 3" 3' 3" 1

2 6' 6" 4' 3" 1 1/2

3 9' 9" 5' 3" 2

4 13' 1" 6' 6" 2

5 16' 4" 8' 2" 2 1/2

6 19' 7" 9' 9" 3

= 34

Note: Load ing conditions are for silty sand to sand and gravel back fill . For finer or clay rich soils,earth pressure on the wall will increase and the wall base width (B) will have to increase for eachheight. Backfill weight = 110 pcf. (1.8 Tons/m 3) (1,762 kg/m 3)- Safe against overturning for soils with a minimum bearing capacity of 2 Tons/foot 2 (19,500 kg/m 2)- For flat or sloping backfills, either a flat or stepped face may be used.

Figure 11.4 Continued. (Adapted from Gray & Leiser, 1982)


10/12


For low to high walls in manygeographic areas today, Mechani-cally Stabilized Earth (MSE), or Reinforced Soil structures arethe least expensive type of wallavailable. They are simple to build,and often they can use on-sitegranular backfill material. Theyare commonly constructed usinglayers of geotextile or welded wire

placed in lifts 15 to 45 cm apartin the soil, thus adding tensile re-inforcement to the soil (see Fig-ure 6.3e ). Driven H piles or sheet piles, with or without tie-

backs, are relatively expensive butare often the most environmen-tally acceptable type of wall. Theycause less site disturbance thangravity or MSE structures that re-

quire a large foundation excava-tion. Most types of retainingstructures and designs provided

by manufacturers are internallystable for the specified use, siteconditions, and height. Most wallfailures occur due to foundationfailure . Thus structures must be

placed on a good foundation, suchas bedrock or firm, in-place soil.

Photo 11.8Photo 11.8Photo 11.8Photo 11.8Photo 11.8 Use physical slope stabilization methods, such asretaining walls, reinforced fills, or rock buttresses where necessaryin areas of space limitation on steep slopes.

Photo 11.9Photo 11.9Photo 11.9Photo 11.9Photo 11.9 Gabions are a commonly used type of low gravityretaining structure because they use locally available rock and arerelatively inexpensive.

PRACTICES TOAVOID

Constructing vertical cutslopes (except in very wellcemented soils and rock).

Road locations and con-struction practices wherethe toe of the fill ends up inthe creek. Do not use side-cast fill placement methodson steep slopes next tostreams.

Placing fills or side-castingmaterials on natural groundslopes steeper than 60%.

Road locations in areas of known instability.

Leaving cut slopes and, par-ticularly, fill slopes barrenand exposed to erosion.


11/12


Use balanced cut and fillconstruction in mostterrain to minimizeearthwork ( Figure 11.1a ).

On steep ground (>60%slope) use full benchconstruction. Consider constructing a narrow,single lane road with inter-visible turnouts to mini-mize excavation ( Figure11.1b ).

Construct cut slopes inmost soils using a cutslope ratio of 3/4:1 to 1:1(horizontal: vertical)( Figure 11.1 ). Use flatter cut slopes in coarse granu-lar and unconsolidatedsoils, in wet areas, and insoft or clay-rich soils. Userelatively flat cut slopes(2:1 or flatter) for low(


12/12


Photo 11.10Photo 11.10Photo 11.10Photo 11.10Photo 11.10 A road fill failure in steep terrain which now needseither a retaining structure or a large road cut around the failure.

Photo 11.11Photo 11.11Photo 11.11Photo 11.11Photo 11.11 A tire-faced,mechanically stabilized earth(MSE) retaining wall, with layersof geotextile reinforcement,being used to gain road width ina fill failure area. MSE(reinforced soil) structures are

often the least expensiveretaining structure available.Welded wire MSE walls are alsocommonly used.

Photo 11.12Photo 11.12Photo 11.12Photo 11.12Photo 11.12 A gabion retainingstructure which will fail soondue to lack of a suitable

foundation. All retainingstructures, either mechanicallystabilized earth (MSE) walls orgravity walls, require a ggggg oodoodoodoodood

f f f f f oundaoundaoundaoundaounda tiontiontiontiontion.

RECOMMENDEDPRACTICES

(continued)

( Photo 11.11 ). Wall back-fill is typically compactedto 95% of the AASHTOT-99 maximum density.

Use retaining structures togain roadway width insteep terrain.

Place retaining structuresonly upon good founda-tion materials, such as

bedrock or firm, in-placesoils ( Photo 11.12 ).

Documents

M Ch11 Slope Stabilization