Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
OF THE TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE
PROGRAM
Title I Directors’ Conference
March 9, 2010
Waterfront Place
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAM
Main PurposeTitle I regulations require a school operating a schoolwide program to annually evaluate the implementation of, and results achieved by, the schoolwide program.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAM
Main PurposeThe annual evaluation must determine whether the schoolwide program was effective in increasing the achievement of students in meeting the State’s academic standards.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAM
Additional PurposesAssist school leaders in making informed decisions
Answer stakeholder questions Increase understanding of specific strategies
Promote interest in and support of a program or activity
IDENTIFYING QUESTIONS TO ASK
Two Types of Questions
Is the program/strategy being implemented as intended?
Did the achievement of students increase to the desired level?
EXAMPLE Goal: Mayberry Elementary School will increase
the percentage of students attaining mastery in reading /language arts.
Objective: The percentage of students obtaining mastery in reading/language arts will increase 2% annually as evidenced by the WESTEST 2.
STRATEGIES
1) Organize the school staff into PLCs with daily common planning periods.
2) Provide professional development for teachers in deconstructing CSOs and developing common assessments.
3) Deconstruct the CSOs and develop common assessments.
4) Administer Acuity benchmark assessments quarterly.
DETERMINE PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE
School must decide collaboratively with the district how the evaluation will be conducted.
Choices of method of evaluationInternallyExternally
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 1
Identify the school’s main purpose and intended audiences
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 2Identify the review questions based on goals, objectives, and strategies
Key review pointsInput ActivitiesShort term impactsLong term impacts
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 3
Identify data collection instrumentsQuantitativeQualitative
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 4
Collect data
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 5
Analyze and interpret results
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 6
Develop a written report
(continued)
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 6 (continued) Content of report
Background information about the school
Evaluation questionsProcedures for gathering dataFindings from data analysisConclusion and recommendations
for improvement
(continued)
EVALUATION/REVIEW PROCESS
Step 6 (continued)
Present the report to staff, parents and community members
UTILIZATION OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION/REVIEW
Use the findings and recommendations to identify the parts of the schoolwide plan that have been implemented ineffectively or not at all.
Solicit the input of all stakeholders in identifying more effective strategies to achieve identified goals.
UTILIZATION OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION/REVIEW
Identify any additional training that is needed to improve implementation.
Determine if additional resources are needed to implement the revised improvement plan and, if so, how they will be obtained.
UTILIZATION OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION/REVIEW Re-establish responsibilities and timelines for
implementing the revised plan. Communicate to all stakeholders what has been
incorporated into the revised plan. Review the implementation review design that
was used and make changes as appropriate to reflect plan modifications in preparation for the following year’s evaluation.
WV TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLANNING DOCUMENT
![Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/56649f575503460f94c7b8a0/schoolwide-consolidation-consolidation-legislation-and-guidance-title-i-schoolwide.jpg)
