Upload
chakravarthyashok
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 m08-fol
1/27
First-Order LogicChapter 8
8/9/2019 m08-fol
2/27
Outline
Why FOL? Syntax and semantics of FOL
Using FOL Wumpus world in FOL Knowledge engineering in FOL
8/9/2019 m08-fol
3/27
Pros and cons of propositional
logic Propositional logic is declarative Propositional logic allows partial/disjunctive/negated
information (unlike most data structures and databases)
Propositional logic is compositional:
meaning ofB1,1 P1,2 is derived from meaning ofB1,1 and ofP1,2
Meaning in propositional logic is context-independent
(unlike natural language, where meaning depends on context)
Propositional logic has very limited expressive power
8/9/2019 m08-fol
4/27
First-order logic
Whereas propositional logic assumes theworld contains facts,
first-order logic (like natural language)assumes the world contains
Objects: people, houses, numbers, colors,
baseball games, wars, Relations: red, round, prime, brother of,
bigger than, part of, comes between,
Functions: father of, best friend, one more
8/9/2019 m08-fol
5/27
Syntax of FOL: Basic elements
Constants KingJohn, 2, NUS,... Predicates Brother, >,...
Functions Sqrt, LeftLegOf,... Variables x, y, a, b,... Connectives , , , ,
Equality = Quantifiers ,
8/9/2019 m08-fol
6/27
Atomic sentences
Atomic sentence = predicate (term1,...,termn)orterm1 = term2
Term = function (term1,...,termn)orconstantorvariable
E.g., Brother(KingJohn,RichardTheLionheart) >
(Length(LeftLegOf(Richard)),Length(LeftLegOf(KingJohn)))
8/9/2019 m08-fol
7/27
Complex sentences
Complex sentences are made from atomicsentences using connectives
S, S1 S2, S1 S2, S1 S2, S1 S2,
E.g. Sibling(KingJohn,Richard) Sibling(Richard,KingJohn)>(1,2) (1,2)>(1,2) >(1,2)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
8/27
Truth in first-order logic Sentences are true with respect to a model and an interpretation
Model contains objects (domain elements) and relations amongthem
Interpretation specifies referents forconstant symbols objects
predicate symbols relations
function symbols functional relations
An atomic sentencepredicate(term1,...,termn) is trueiff the objects referred to by term1,...,termnare in the relation referred to bypredicate
8/9/2019 m08-fol
9/27
Models for FOL: Example
8/9/2019 m08-fol
10/27
Universal quantification
Everyone at NUS is smart:x At(x,NUS) Smart(x)
x P is true in a model m iffP is true with xbeing eachpossible object in the model
Roughly speaking, equivalent to the conjunction of
instantiations ofP
At(KingJohn,NUS) Smart(KingJohn)
At(Richard,NUS) Smart(Richard)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
11/27
A common mistake to avoid
Typically, is the main connective with
Common mistake: using
as the mainconnective with :x At(x,NUS) Smart(x)means Everyone is at NUS and everyone is smart
8/9/2019 m08-fol
12/27
Existential quantification
Someone at NUS is smart: xAt(x,NUS) Smart(x)$
x P is true in a model m iffP is true with xbeing some
possible object in the model
Roughly speaking, equivalent to the disjunction ofinstantiations ofP
At(KingJohn,NUS) Smart(KingJohn)
At(Richard,NUS) Smart(Richard)
At(NUS,NUS) Smart(NUS)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
13/27
Another common mistake to
avoid Typically, is the main connective with Common mistake: using as the main
connective with :
xAt(x,NUS) Smart(x)
is true if there is anyone who is not at NUS!
8/9/2019 m08-fol
14/27
Properties of quantifiers x y is the same as y x x y is the same as y x
x y is not the same as y x x y Loves(x,y)
There is a person who loves everyone in the world
y
x Loves(x,y) Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person
Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other
x Likes(x,IceCream)
x
Likes(x,IceCream)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
15/27
Equality
term1 = term2 is true under a given interpretationif and only ifterm1 and term2 refer to the sameobject
E.g., definition ofSiblingin terms ofParent:
x,ySibling(x,y) [(x = y) m,f (m = f) Parent(m,x) Parent(f,x) Parent(m,y) Parent(f,y)]
8/9/2019 m08-fol
16/27
Using FOL
The kinship domain:
Brothers are siblings
x,y Brother(x,y) Sibling(x,y)
One's mother is one's female parent
m,c Mother(c) = m (Female(m) Parent(m,c))
8/9/2019 m08-fol
17/27
Using FOL
The set domain:
s Set(s) (s = {} ) (x,s2 Set(s2) s = {x|s2})
x,s {x|s} = {} x,s x s s = {x|s} x,s x s [y,s2} (s = {y|s2} (x = y x s2))] s1,s2 s1 s2 (x x s1 x s2) s1,s2 (s1 = s2) (s1 s2 s2 s1)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
18/27
Interacting with FOL KBs Suppose a wumpus-world agent is using an FOL KB and perceives a smell
and a breeze (but no glitter) at t=5:
Tell(KB,Percept([Smell,Breeze,None],5))Ask(KB,a BestAction(a,5))
I.e., does the KB entail some best action at t=5?
Answer: Yes, {a/Shoot} substitution (binding list)
Given a sentence Sand a substitution , S denotes the result of plugging into S; e.g.,
S= Smarter(x,y) = {x/Hillary,y/Bill}S = Smarter(Hillary,Bill)
Ask KB,S returns some/all such that KB
8/9/2019 m08-fol
19/27
Knowledge base for the
wumpus world Perception t,s,b Percept([s,b,Glitter],t) Glitter(t)
Reflex t Glitter(t) BestAction(Grab,t)
8/9/2019 m08-fol
20/27
Deducing hidden properties
x,y,a,b Adjacent([x,y],[a,b]) [a,b] {[x+1,y], [x-1,y],[x,y+1],[x,y-1]}
Properties of squares: s,t At(Agent,s,t) Breeze(t) Breezy(s)
Squares are breezy near a pit:
Diagnostic rule---infer cause from effects Breezy(s) \Exi{r} Adjacent(r,s) Pit(r)$
8/9/2019 m08-fol
21/27
Knowledge engineering in FOL
1. Identify the task2.2. Assemble the relevant knowledge
3.3. Decide on a vocabulary of predicates,
functions, and constants4.4. Encode general knowledge about the domain5.5. Encode a description of the specific problem
instance
8/9/2019 m08-fol
22/27
The electronic circuits domain
One-bit full adder
8/9/2019 m08-fol
23/27
The electronic circuits domain
1. Identify the task2.
Does the circuit actually add properly? (circuitverification)
2. Assemble the relevant knowledge3.
Composed of wires and gates; Types of gates (AND,
OR, XOR, NOT) Irrelevant: size, shape, color, cost of gates
3. Decide on a vocabulary
4.
8/9/2019 m08-fol
24/27
The electronic circuits domain
4. Encode general knowledge of the domain5.
t1,t2 Connected(t1, t2) Signal(t1) = Signal(t2)
t Signal(t) = 1
Signal(t) = 0 1 0 t1,t2 Connected(t1, t2) Connected(t2, t1)
g Type(g) = OR Signal(Out(1,g)) = 1 nSignal(In(n,g)) = 1
g Type(g) = AND Signal(Out(1,g)) = 0 n
Signal(In(n,g)) = 0
8/9/2019 m08-fol
25/27
The electronic circuits domain
5. Encode the specific problem instance6.
Type(X1) = XOR Type(X2) = XORType(A1) = AND Type(A2) = ANDType(O1) = OR
Connected(Out(1,X1),In(1,X2)) Connected(In(1,C1),In(1,X1))Connected(Out(1,X1),In(2,A2)) Connected(In(1,C1),In(1,A1))Connected(Out(1,A2),In(1,O1)) Connected(In(2,C1),In(2,X1))
Connected(Out(1,A1),In(2,O1)) Connected(In(2,C1),In(2,A1))Connected(Out(1,X2),Out(1,C1)) Connected(In(3,C1),In(2,X2))Connected(Out(1,O1),Out(2,C1)) Connected(In(3,C1),In(1,A2))
8/9/2019 m08-fol
26/27
The electronic circuits domain
6. Pose queries to the inference procedure7.
What are the possible sets of values of all theterminals for the adder circuit?
i1,i2,i3,o1,o2 Signal(In(1,C_1)) = i1 Signal(In(2,C1)) =
i2 Signal(In(3,C1)) = i3 Signal(Out(1,C1)) = o1 Signal(Out(2,C1)) = o2
7. Debug the knowledge base
8/9/2019 m08-fol
27/27
Summary
First-order logic:
objects and relations are semantic primitives syntax: constants, functions, predicates,equality, quantifiers
Increased expressive power: sufficient todefine wumpus world