47
MACRA: Medicare’s Shift to Value-based Delivery & Payment Models Robert Hall, JD Director, Government Relations

MACRA: Medicare’s Shift to Value-based Delivery ...Medicare’s Shift to Value-based Delivery & Payment Models Robert Hall, JD Director, Government Relations The US has a Budget

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • MACRA:Medicare’s Shift to Value-based

    Delivery & Payment ModelsRobert Hall, JD

    Director, Government Relations

  • https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjJsbHdyfTPAhXHzz4KHRaKB80QjRwIBw&url=https://missamberlong.com/2016/02/03/learning-to-share-a-drink-and-other-things-that-made-me-grow-up/thelist-how-did-i-get-here-dorothy-100568058-large-idge/&psig=AFQjCNEvEjc6KiXYPQKlGd2HHwGWY0BiHA&ust=1477437466086994

  • The US has a Budget Problem

  • The driver is health costPe

    rcen

    t of

    US

    GD

    P

  • $210bnUnnecessary Services

    $190bnAdministrative Costs

    $130bnInefficient

    Delivery of Care

    $55bnPrevention

    Failures

    $105bnInflated Prices $75bn

    Fraud

    U.S. HEALTHCARE WASTE = NETHERLANDS GDP

    $765bnin wasted spending

    Source: Institute of Medicine (2009 data); The World Bank (2009 data)

  • Healthcare Expenditures vs. Outcomes

    Healthcare Expenditures as % of GDP, 2005*

    757677787980818283

    USA Sweden France Canada Japan UK

    Average life expectancy, 2007

    *Bradley EH, et al. Health and Social Services Expenditures: Associations with Health Outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf (2011). *McGinnis JM, Russo PG, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):78–93

    Chart1

    USA

    Sweden

    France

    Canada

    Japan

    UK

    Column1

    16

    12.1

    12

    10.3

    8.6

    8.2

    Sheet1

    Column1

    USA16

    Sweden12.1

    France12

    Canada10.3

    Japan8.6

    UK8.2

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

    Chart1

    USA

    Sweden

    France

    Canada

    Japan

    UK

    Column1

    77.9

    81

    80.9

    80.7

    82.6

    79.7

    Sheet1

    Column1

    USA77.9

    Sweden81

    France80.9

    Canada80.7

    Japan82.6

    UK79.7

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • Pay Now … Or Pay Later

    Hospital inpatient 27%

    Hospital outpatient visits/other 28%

    Professional procedures (non-

    hospital) 30%

    Drugs 16%

    Primary Care 6%

  • Source: RWJF/UWPHI.

    GENETICS DIET & EXERCISE

    TOBACCO USEALCOHOL &

    DRUG USESLEEP SEXUAL

    ACTIVITYACCESS TO CARE

    QUALITY OF CARE

    EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT INCOME SOCIAL SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY SAFETY

    AIR QUALITY

    WATER QUALITY

    HOUSING TRANSIT

    THE FUTURE HEALTH ECOSYSTEM WILL FOCUS ON THE TRUE DRIVERS OF OUTCOMES

  • Current State

    Over Utilization

    Volume over Value

    Silos of Care

    1010

    Fee for Service

  • Sustainable Growth Rate2002-2015

    Chart1

    20022002

    20032003

    20042004

    20052005

    20062006

    20072007

    20082008

    20092009

    20102010

    20112011

    20122012

    20132013

    20142014

    20152015

    SGR Payments

    Cumulative SGR Payments

    Percentage

    -5

    -5

    1.4

    -3.6

    1.5

    -2.1

    1.5

    -0.6

    0.2

    -0.4

    0

    -0.4

    0.5

    0.1

    1.1

    1.2

    2.2

    3.4

    0

    3.4

    0

    3.4

    0

    3.4

    0.5

    3.9

    -22

    -18.1

    Sheet1

    YearSGR PaymentsCumulative SGR Payments

    2002-5-5

    20031.4-3.6

    20041.5-2.1

    20051.5-0.6

    20060.2-0.4

    20070-0.4

    20080.50.1

    20091.11.2

    20102.23.4

    201103.4

    201203.4

    201303.4

    20140.53.9

    2015-22-18.1

  • “The difference between what’s made available to me as a surgeon and what’s made available to our internists or pediatricians (or family physicians) or HIV specialists is not just shortsighted – it’s immoral”

    Atul GawandeThe Heroism of Incremental CareAnnals of Medicine, January 23, 2017

  • MACRA Legislative Timeline

    MACRA enacted

    Request for Information

    Proposed Rule released

    Final Rule w/ comment

    14

    *Medicare physician fee schedule published separately

    April 16, 2015 October 1, 2015 April 27, 2016 October 14, 2016

  • What Does MACRA Do?• Repeals the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)

    • Extends Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) funding for 2 years

    • Provides Annual Baseline Fee Schedule Updates 2016-2018

    • Creates 2 payment pathways

    15

  • What Does MACRA Do In Medicare?

    • Consolidates quality programs

    Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

    • Potential for bonus payment for participation

    Advanced Alternative Payment Models (AAPM)

    16

  • 17

  • QPP Participants

    Physicians (MD/DO)

    Physician Assistant

    Nurse Practitioner

    Clinical Nurse

    Specialist

    Certified Registered

    Nurse Anesthetist

    MACRA defines eligible clinicians as:

  • Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

    (MIPS)

  • MIPS HighlightsConsolidates existing quality and value programs• Adds a category for Improvement Activities

    Establishes a Final Score• Weighted scoring by category

    Provides opportunity for payment adjustments• Both positive and negative

    20

  • What’s it called?

    21

    ValueModifier

    MU

    PQRS Resource Use

    AdvancingCare

    Information

    Quality Cost

    AdvancingCare

    Information

    Quality

    MACRA – April 2015 Proposed Rule – April 2016 Final Rule– October 2016

    AdvancingCare

    InformationIA

    CPIACPIA

  • MIPS Final Score

    22

    Quality Cost Improvement Activities

    Advancing Care

    Information (ACI)

  • Improvement Activities – New! • Expanded Practice Access• Population Management• Care Coordination• Beneficiary Engagement• Patient Safety and Practice Assessment• Achieving Health Equity• Emergency Response and Preparedness• Integrated Behavioral and Mental Health

    23

    **2018 Proposed Rule – More Options added included Performance CME and Appropriate Use Criteria

  • Weighting by Category - 2017

    Quality, 60%

    Cost, 0%

    Improvement Activities1, 15%

    Advancing Care Information,

    25%

    1 - “Certified” PCMH receives the full credit for IA; APM Participants receive half credit

    24

  • Proposed Weighting for 2018

    Quality, 50 or 60%

    Cost, 0% or 10%???

    Improvement Activities1, 15%

    Advancing Care Information,

    25%

    1 - “Certified” PCMH receives the full credit for IA; APM Participants receive half credit

    Jumps to 30% in 2019,as required by statue

    25

  • Weighting Progression2019 2020 2021

    Quality 60% 50% 30%

    Cost 0% 10% 30%

    Advancing Care Information 25% 25% 25%

    Improvement Activities 15% 15% 15%

    26

  • ‘Pick Your Pace’

    27

    Test Partial ParticipationFull

    ParticipationAdvanced

    APM

  • ‘Pick your Pace’ Options for 2017Test

    • Submit some data to QPP

    • No negative adjustment

    Partial Participation• Report

    minimum 90 days

    • Smallpositive adjustment

    Full Participation• Report 90

    days up to full year

    • Modest positive adjustment

    Advanced APM

    • Qualifying Program & Qualified Participant

    • 5% incentive payment

    NO NEGATIVE PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS

  • “Pick Your Pace” Reporting

    29

    • Report one quality measure, one improvement activity, or all four of the required measures within the advancing care information (ACI) category

    Test

    • Report a minimum of 90 days for more than one quality measure, more than one improvement activity, or more than four of the measures within the ACI category.

    Partial Participation

    • Report to MIPS for a full 90-day period or full year

    Full Participation

  • Annual Performance Threshold• Established by Secretary years 1 and 2

    – For transition year 2017, threshold is 3– For 2018, proposed threshold is increased 15

    • Below = negative payment adjustments

    • Above = positive payment adjustments

    30

  • Adjust Payments

    -4% -5% -7% -9%

    4%5% 7%

    9%

    2019 2020 2021 2022 onward

    *Adjustment to provider’s base rate of Medicare Part B payment

    *Potential for

    3Xadjustment

    31

  • Adjustment Summary

    32

    Performance Score Payment Adjustment

    Exceptional Performers (Final Score over 70) =

    Eligible for up to 10% positive adjustment in

    2019

    25th Percentile or below = Maximum negativeadjustmentAt threshold = Stable Payment

  • MIPS Exemptions

    33

    • Year 1 Medicare• Eligible Advanced Alternative Payment Model with Bonus• Below low volume threshold

    – Less than or equal to $30,000 Medicare payments; or less than or equal to 100 Medicare beneficiaries

    – PROPOSED FOR 2018 – less than or equal to $90K Medicare payments; or less than or equal to 200 Medicare beneficiaries

  • Advanced Alternative Payment Models

    (AAPMs)

  • DefinitionsQualifying APM• Based on existing payment models

    Advanced APM• Based on criteria of the payment model

    Qualifying AAPM Participant• Based on individual physician payment

    or patient volume

    35

  • Qualifying APMs

    36

    • MSSP (Medicare Shares Savings Program)

    • Expanded under CMS Innovation Center Model*

    • Demonstration under Medicare Healthcare Quality Demonstrations (MHCQ) or Acute Care Episode Demonstration

    • “Demonstration required by Federal Law”

    Qualifying APMs

  • Advanced APM Eligibility

    37

    • Quality measures comparable to MIPS

    • Use of certified EHR technology

    • More than nominal risk OR Medical Home model expanded under CMMI authority

    Qualifying APMs

    Advanced APMs

  • Primary Care Advanced APMs

    • Shared Savings Program (Tracks 2 & 3)• Next Generation ACO Model• Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+)

    38

  • Qualifying APM Participant

    39

    • Percentage of patients or payments thru eligible APM

    • In 2019, the threshold is 25% of Medicare payments or 20% of beneficiaries

    • QP status will be determined at the group level

    Qualifying APMs

    Advanced APMs

    Qualifying APM

    Participant

  • Additional Rewards for Qualifying Participants

    40

    • Not subject to MIPS• 5% bonus 2019-2024• Higher fee schedule update to 0.75% 2026

    QPAdvanced APM

  • MACRA Timeline2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022-2024 2025 2026

    Medicare Part B Baseline Payment Updates

    +0.5% +0.5% +0.5% 0% 0% 0% +0.25%*+0.75%***Non-qualifying APM Conversion Factor**Qualifying APM Conversion Factor

    Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)PQRS, Value-based

    Modifier, & Meaningful Use Quality, Cost, Advancing Care Information, & Improvement Activities

    -9% -9%? 0 or +/-4%*“Pick Your Pace”

    +/-5% +/-7%

    Qualifying APM Participant5% Incentive payment

    Excluded from MIPS

    +0%

    +/-9%

    41

  • Proposed Changes for 2018• Virtual Groups will begin in 2018 – more details to come• ACI – allowing use 2014 or 2015 Edition CEHRT; new

    hardship exemption for small practices • New Small Practice Bonus (15 or less physicians will get 5 bonus

    points added to final score if they submit data for at least one performance category)

    • New Complex Patient Bonus (3 points added to final score for caring for complex patients)

    • Performance Period now 12 months for Quality and Cost/ 90 minimum for ACI and Improvement Activities

    42

  • Performance year

    2017

    Submit

    March 31, 2018

    Feedback available Adjustment

    2018 January 1, 2019

    Performance: The first performance period opens January 1, 2017 and closes December 31, 2017. During this period, providers will record quality data and how they used technology to support their practices

    Submit data: To qualify for a positive payment adjustment under MIPS, providers must send in data by March 31, 2018. To earn the 5% incentive payment for participating in an Advanced APM, providers must send quality data through their Advanced APM

    Feedback: Medicare will give providers performance feedback after the submission of data

    Payment: A provider may earn a positive MIPS adjustmentpayment beginning on January 1, 2019 if it submits 2017 data by the deadline. Those participating in an Advanced APM in 2017 may earn a 5% incentive payment in 2019

    2017 Performance Period Timeline

  • Getting Started

    44

  • Assistance is Available

    • Find a PTN– Go to aafp.org/tcpi

    – Click “Find a PTN” to find a practice transformation network in your area

    – Email [email protected] any questions.

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Questions?

    Robert Hall, JDAAFP, Director of Government Relations

    [email protected], ext. 2510

    mailto:[email protected]

    MACRA:�Medicare’s Shift to Value-based Delivery & Payment ModelsSlide Number 2The US has a Budget ProblemThe driver is health costU.S. HEALTHCARE WASTE = NETHERLANDS GDPHealthcare Expenditures vs. Outcomes Pay Now … Or Pay Later �THE FUTURE HEALTH ECOSYSTEM WILL FOCUS ON THE TRUE DRIVERS OF OUTCOMESSlide Number 9Current StateSustainable Growth Rate�2002-2015Slide Number 12Slide Number 13MACRA Legislative TimelineWhat Does MACRA Do?What Does MACRA Do In Medicare?Slide Number 17QPP ParticipantsMerit-Based Incentive Payment System MIPS HighlightsWhat’s it called?MIPS Final ScoreImprovement Activities – New! Weighting by Category - 2017Proposed Weighting for 2018Weighting Progression‘Pick Your Pace’‘Pick your Pace’ Options for 2017“Pick Your Pace” Reporting Annual Performance ThresholdAdjust PaymentsAdjustment SummaryMIPS ExemptionsAdvanced Alternative Payment ModelsDefinitionsQualifying APMsAdvanced APM EligibilityPrimary Care Advanced APMsQualifying APM ParticipantAdditional Rewards for �Qualifying ParticipantsMACRA TimelineProposed Changes for 2018Slide Number 43Getting StartedAssistance is AvailableSlide Number 46Questions?