Upload
masayuki-kato
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Abstracts
Incidence of DVTafter ESD may be not as high as that of abdominal surgery, but it isdifficult to detect early because these patients are asymptomtic. CDdO1 ug/ml wasexpected as a predictor of DVT although operation timeS100min is a confounder.But ultrasonography should be required for early diagnosis of DVT after ESD.
S1477
Is Autofluorescence Imaging Endoscopy Useful for Determining
the Invasion Depth of Gastric Cancer?Yuji Amano, Aya Otani, Yuko Mishima, Yoshiko Takahashi, Kenji Koshino,Norihisa Ishimura, Shunji Ishihara, Yoshikazu KinoshitaBackground and Aims: Newly developed autofluorescence imaging (AFI)endoscopy provides for detection of autofluorescence arising from thegastrointestinal mucosa. Lesions, such as a tumor or inflammation, block reflectiveautofluorescence, and the weakened autofluorescence is subsequently detected asa magenta color by the AFI endoscope instead of the light green of normal mucosa.This is valuable for effective diagnosis of the presence of a tumor or inflammation.In the normal gastrointestinal wall, autofluorescence is primarily generated bycollagen fibers of the submucosal layer. Therefore, AFI endoscopy possibly providesfor differentiation of tumor invasion depth. We evaluated whether it was possible todetermine the depth of the tumor invasion by measuring the reflectiveautofluorescence. Patients and Methods: Endoscopic images were first processedby de-gamma software before numerical analysis of autofluorescent images. Then,images were split into 3 separate bands (R, G and B) and expressed as grayscalevalues. An AF index was defined as the ratio of the grayscale value for the G-bandimage to that of R-band in a preliminary study using porcine stomachs and a mimiclesion. From April 2007 to March 2008, AF indices were preoperatively calculatedfor 69 lesions of gastric cancer with elevated form from 66 patients and werestatistically compared to invasion depth and tumor thickness. Lesion grades werehistologically classified into the following 5 groups: ‘‘M’’, 29; ‘‘SM’’, 22; ‘‘MP’’, 5;‘‘SS’’, 5; ‘‘SE’’, 8 after the resection. Gastric cancer with ulceration was excluded asthe whitish exudate of ulceration disturbed the measurement of theautofluorescence intensity. Results: The mean AF indices for tumors at each depthstage were: 1.01 � 0.29, 0.86 � 0.18, 0.76 � 0.13, 0.72 � 0.17, and 0.62 � 0.08,respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between ‘‘M’’ and theother stages (p!0.05). The AF index also showed a significant negative correlationto the mean thickness of the tumor (rZ-0.024, p!0.05). Discussion:Determination of the tumor invasion depth plays an important role for therapeuticstrategies, although it is not easily or reliably done for all cases. In the present study,we could differentiate the depth of ‘‘M’’ tumors from others via the analysis ofautofluorescence intensity. This suggests a new simple diagnostic tool for the tumordepth evaluation. However, to demonstrate its validity, additional studies of a largenumber of different tumor types will be required. Conclusions: AFI endoscopy maybe useful for determining tumor invasion depth in gastric cancer withoutulceration.
S1478
Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging Achieves
a Higher Diagnostic Accuracy As Compared to White Light
Endoscopy in Superficial Gastric Depressed Lesion. A
Prospective Comparative StudyMasayuki Kato, Mitsuru Kaise, Jin Yonezawa, Toyoizumi Hirobumi,Noboru Yoshimura, Yukinaga Yoshida, Hisao TajiriBackground: Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI)has been used for differential diagnosis of various focal neoplasias. Conductinga retrospective study, we reported that the triad of ME-NBI findings (disappearanceof fine mucosal structure, microvascular dilation and heterogeneity) was the bestcombination for gastric cancer diagnosis with a high accuracy (sensitivityZ70%,specificityZ85%) and moderate inter-observer accordance (0.47 of kappa valueamong 11 endoscopists), which were superior to those (sensitivityZ70%,specificityZ65%, kappa valueZ0.36) with white light endoscopy (WLE). Aim: Toconfirm the superiority of ME-NBI gastric cancer diagnosis with the triad incomparison to WLE in a prospective study. Patients and Method: Patients whounderwent WLE followed by ME-NBI for a preoperative workup examination or fora post-ESD follow-up endoscopy at a referral academic center were eligible to thisstudy. Superficial gastric depressed lesions, which were recognized with WLE ascandidates for differential diagnosis between gastric cancers and benign lesions,were prospectively enrolled. All of the recruited lesions were biopsied, and thepathological diagnoses were used as the gold standard for this study. Gastric lesionsthat had already been proven pathologically as cancers were excluded. WLE andME-NBI was serially performed using zoom endoscopes (GIF-240Z or GIF-H260Z)and an electric endoscopic system (EVIS 260 Spectrum; Olympus Medical Systems).Endoscopists reported WLE general diagnosis (benign or malignant), ME-NBIgeneral diagnosis without any specified criteria, and ME-NBI diagnosis with thepredefined triad. Result: 1) A total of 171 lesions from 91 patients (81 males and 10females, mean age of 66 years) were enrolled. Mean diameter of the 171 lesionswere 6.6mm. Nine of the 171 lesions were pathologically proven as gastric cancers,and others were benign depressed lesions. 2) The sensitivity (89%) and specificity
AB182 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY Volume 69, No. 5 : 2009
(93%) of ME-NBI diagnosis with the triad were significantly (p!0.05) higher thanthe sensitivity (22%) and specificity (65%) of WLE general diagnosis, and wereequivalent to the sensitivity (89%) and specificity (89%) of ME-NBI generaldiagnosis. Conclusion: The prospective study showed that ME-NBI with the triadachieves a significantly higher accuracy of cancer diagnosis as compared to WLE insuperficial gastric depressed lesion. Therefore, ME-NBI can be a promisingdiagnostic modality for the population with a high risk of gastric cancer.
S1479
One Year Follow-Up Results of Magnify NBI for Gastric Intestinal
Metaplasia SurveillanceBoonlert Imraporn, Sukprasert Jutaghokiat, Naruemon Wisedopas,Varocha Mahachai, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Sombat Treeprasertsuk,Pinit KullavanijayaBackground: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) can progress into gastric cancer.Narrow band imaging with magnification endoscopy (NBI-ME) can be used formore accurate targeted biopsy of GIM. To date, no data on the accuracy andprogression of GIM detected by NBI-ME are available. Aim: To evaluate the utility ofNBI-ME for a follow up of GIM. Methods: 16 patients with previously diagnosedwith GIM were prospectively examined by NBI-ME (EVIS EXERA Olympus GIFQ160Z) on 2 occasions within 1 year interval. At each endoscopy, targeted biopsy (4from antrum and 2 from incisura) was done according to endoscopic criteriaincluding light blue crests, villous pattern and large long crests. Specimens wereexamined by one pathologist based on the updated Sydney classification. Results:There were 35/96 and 31/96 specimens with positive for GIM by histology at the 1stand 2nd endoscopies respectively. Results are shown in the table. Within 1 year GIMin 10/16 patients persisted, 4/16 regressed and 2/16 were steadily undetectable.Conclusion: NBI-ME can be effectively applied for follow up of GIM with highconsistent of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy. However, one yearfollow-up is not long enough to detect the progression of GIM.
Results of one year follow up for gastric intestinal metaplasia with magnify NBI
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
www.gie
Criteria
First S econd F irst Second F irst S econd First S econd F irstjourn
Second
LBC (%)
74.4 8 3.3 8 6.0 91.7 7 8.4 8 5.8 83.1 9 0.2 8 1.3 88.6 VP (%) 45.7 5 8.1 8 5.3 87.7 6 4.0 6 9.2 73.2 8 1.4 7 0.9 78.1 LLC (%) 25.0 3 8.5 9 1.1 88.6 6 6.7 5 5.6 63.0 7 9.5 6 3.6 75.0 All criteria(%)74.3 9
0.3 8 8.5 89.2 7 8.8 8 0.0 85.7 9 5.1 8 3.3 89.6LBCZlight blue crest VP Zvillous pattern LLCZlarge long crest
LBC
S1480
A Study On Emergency Gastro-Intestinal Endoscopic Hemostasis
Related to Anti Platelet Drugs, Anti Thrombosis Drugs, and Non-
Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)Jun Takada, Hiroshi Araki, Fumito Onogi, Takashi Ibuka,Hisataka MoriwakiAim: We studied clinical characteristics of emergency gastro-intestinal endoscopichemostasis related to anti platelet drugs, anti thrombosis drugs, and non-steroidalanti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods: From May 2004 to March 2006, weperformed emergency gastro-intestinal endoscopic hemostasis in 113 cases, male83 cases, female 30 cases. Mean age was 65.7. According to the use of anti plateletdrugs and anti thrombosis drugs, we divided the cases into two groups. Group A isconsisted of cases under medication with these drugs and group B is not undermedication with them. We compared two groups for age, sex, background disease,symptom, diagnosis, location of lesion, number of lesion, use of anti-ulcer drugs,
al.org