main chapter two

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    1/10

    NICHOLAS HONLAH MENSAH( 1014308)

    CHAPTER TWO

    2.0 INTRODUCTION

    Financial statement summarizes economic performance of firms. In order to make use of this

    accounting information, the users needs to analyze and interpret its meaning. When confronted

    with financial statement for decision making purposes, it is useful to have a framework of

    analysis available to make an attempt to extract what is important from the mass of less

    important data.

    Financial analysis is a natural extension of an adjust to accounting. Accounting procedures

    aggregate data and eliminate details in order to present a clear picture of the firm (Glenn V,

    Henderson et al 1984).

    2.1 DEFINITIONS OF RATIOS

    Ratios analysis has been given several definitions in finance, banking and accounting literature.

    Some of these definitions are;

    A) Ratios are relationship between different balances or between account balances andvarious income statements. (Henderson et al 1984).

    B) Ratio is simply one number expressed in terms of another number to show therelationship between the two numbers. (Jennings 1993)

    C) Ratio is an expression of the mathematical relationship between one quantity and another.(Engler 1990). Considering what Engler has said about ratios they are tools of analysis

    that provide clues and symptoms of underlying conditions.

    D) Welsh(1971) and Zlatkovich (1986) have both shown that ratios are The indicatedquotient of two mathematical expressions and the relationship between two or more

    things

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    2/10

    2.2.1 FIANACIAL STATEMENT RATIO

    Financial statement ratios continue to be the primary means by which managers and other users

    of financial statement assess the progress of economic entities.

    There are several of these ratios which assist stock holders in their decision making. However,

    for the purpose of this study, they are categorized into;

    a. Liquidity ratiob. Leverage ratioc. Activity ratiod. Profitability ratioe. Market ratio

    2.2.2 LIQUIDITY RATIO

    Liquidity ratio measure a firms ability to meet current obligations. They focus on a companys

    ability to pay bills when they fall due. In other words they show how solvent a firm is to meets

    its short term obligations as they fall due ( Mulford, et al 2010). These consist of current ratio,

    that is current assets/current liabilities and quick ratio that is current assets less inventory/current

    liabilities.

    The purpose of these ratios are to establish the companies capacity to meet its current liabilities

    as they fall due and to strip out the slower moving item (inventory/stock) from current assets to

    measure real short- term liquidity. In their view ACCA( 1987) states that the liquidity ratios and

    working capital turnover ratios are used to test a companies liquidity, length of cash cycle and

    investment in working capital.

    Normally, the acceptable current ratio should not be less than 1.0 and when this happens its

    signals financial problem. Most analysts consider 2.0 current ratios to be safe and desirable

    target. (Yiadom 1999)

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    3/10

    2.2.3 LEVERAGE RATIOS

    Leverage ratios or debt management ratios are the extent to which a firm uses debt in financing

    its operations. It has three implications according to Brigham (1995);

    i) By raising funds through debt, shareholders can maintain control of a firm whilelimiting their investment.

    ii) Creditors look to equity or owner supply funds to provide a margin of safety, so if thestockholders have provide only a small proportion as the total financing the risk of the

    enterprise are borne by its creditors.

    iii) If the firm earns more investment financed borrowed fund than its pay interest, thereturn on owners capital is manifested or leveraged.

    Equally, they shows the proportions of debt and equity in financing the firms assets, thus,

    relative proportion of debt and equity used to finance the assets of an entity.

    Principally, there are two types of leverage ratios which are debt ratio and equity ratio.

    Mathematically, A) Debt ratio = Total Debt

    Total Assets

    B) Debt Equity = Total Debt

    Total Equity

    Essentially, the goal is to borrow and invest the funds in business activity that produces a greater

    return than the interest that has to be paid on borrowed funds. It also attempts to measure the

    long-term solvency of the company (Brigham1995), advocated that the financial leverages can

    raise the expected rate of return to shareholders in many ways;

    1) Since interest is deductible the use of debts lowers the tax bill and leaves more of thefirms operating income available to its investors. Notably, high price earnings ratio may

    indicate that investors expect high dividend growth or the stock has low risk and

    investors are content with long term prospective return and the company is expected to

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    4/10

    achieve average growth while paying out a high proportion at earnings (Brealy andMyres

    1999).

    2) Dividend per share i.e. dividend proposed/outstanding shares is the portion that isavailable to shareholders.

    3) Dividend yield i.e. dividend per share/stock price. It is used to compare the differentinvestment alternatives.

    4) Dividend payout ratio i.e. dividend per share/ earnings per share, between its ordinaryshareholders and re-investing them in the firm. High growth firms typically re-invest

    their earnings instead of paying them out resulting in low pay-out ratios.

    5) It must be noted that a higher pay out ratio indicates a slow growth. Therefore if acompanys earnings are particularly variable management is likely to play by setting a

    low average pay-out ratio. The purpose of market ratio are the measurement of the

    esteem in which in which they are held by investors.

    2.2.4 ACTIVITY RATIO

    Activity ratios measure company sales per another asset account thus the most common asset

    accounts used are accounts receivable, inventory, and total assets. Watson and head (2010, p.49)

    states that activity ratios shows how efficiently a company has managed short-term assets and

    liabilities. Activity ratio also evaluates how well the company manages its assets. Besides

    determining the value of the company's assets, you and your client should also analyze how

    effectively the company employs its assets.

    In his view Doyle (2010) states that there are three common assessed activity ratios and these are

    trade receivables turnover ratio, inventory turnover ratio and trade payable turnover ratio.According to waston and Head (2010) trade receivables turnover gives the average period of

    credit taken by customers. Inventory turnover ratio also shows how long it takes for a company

    its inventories into sales and also trade payables gives the average time taken for suppliers of

    goods and services to receive payment.

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    5/10

    Mathematically, the three types of activity ratios are as follows;

    A) Trade receivables turnover ratio s= debtors * 365Credit sales

    B) Inventory turnover ratio = inventory * 365Cost of sales

    C) Trade payables ratios = creditors *365Cost of sales

    The information used to calculate an activity ratio is found on a companys balance sheet orincome statement. Doyle (2010)

    2.2.5 PROFITABILTY RATIO

    According to waston and Head (2010) profitability ratio indicate how successful the managers of

    the company been in generating profit. To them return on capital employed is often the primary

    ratio. In their view weygandt et al (2005) states that profitability measures the income or

    operating success of an enterprise for a given period of time. They went to say that profitability

    affects the liquidity position and the firms ability to grow. Profitability is used as the ultimate

    test of management operating effectiveness. Weygandt et al (2005)

    There are four types of profitability ratios that are used to determine the profit of a company and

    these are ; Sales growth which measures the changes in growth of a rate of firm sales thuschanges in turnover/previous years turnover multiply by hundred.

    Gross profit margin which also reflect the efficiency with which management produces each unit

    of product. It also measure the percentage of each money of sales that results in net income.

    Weygandt et al (2005). It is computed by dividing gross profit by turnover multiply by hundred.

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    6/10

    Return on assets. This also measures the operating efficiency of the firm. Thus, net profit before

    tax/total assets.

    Return on equity also measures how well the company has used the resources of its owners. This

    ratio shows how many dollars of net income were earned for each dollar invested by the owner.

    Weygandt et al (2005). Thus net profit before tax /net worth. An increase in these ratios is

    viewed as a positive trend. Doyle (2010).

    2.2.6 MARKET RATIO

    These are the ratios which help equity shareholders and other investors to assess the value and

    quality of an investment in the ordinary shares of a company Ainsworth et al (1996). Market

    ratio which is also known as the investment ratio does not only regard information in the

    companys published account but also the current price, and the fourth, fifth and sixth ratios all

    involve using share price according to ACCA(1998). In their view wood and Sangster (2008)

    states that the purpose of this ratio is to indicate how well a company is performing in relation to

    the price of its shares and other related items including dividends and the number of shares in

    issue. The usually calculated are explained below;

    Dividend per share. This indicates the dividend received by each ordinary shareholder. It shows

    the proportion of profit on ordinary activities for the year that is available for distribution to

    shareholders and what proportion will be retained in business to finance future growth.

    Ainsworth et al (1996). It is computed mathematically as;

    Dividend per share () = proposed dividend *100

    Number of shareholders

    Dividend yield. This ratio measures the real rate of return by the dividend paid to the market

    price of a share. Wood and Sangster (2008). This is compared to the yield available on

    alternative investments to help investors evaluate the extent to which their investment objectives

    were met. The average dividend yield on common market stocks has historically been in the

    range of 3% to 6%. Ainsworth et al (1996). It is computed mathematically as;

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    7/10

    Dividend yield = dividend per share * 100

    Market price per share

    Earning Per share. According to Ainsworth et al (1996) earning per share measures the net

    income earned on each share of common stock. They went on to say that it is most frequently

    quoted measure of firms performance in the financial press and it is required disclosure on the

    face of the income statement. It is computed by dividing the net income by the number of

    shareholding.

    Price earnings. This ratio relates the earning per share to the market price of the shares and is a

    useful indicator of how the stock market assesses the company. It is also useful when a company

    proposes an issue of new shares, thus it enable potential investors to better asses whether the

    expected future earnings make the share a worthwhile investment. wood and Sangster (2008).

    2.3 USES OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT RATIO

    Ratio analysis of financial statement is used widely with sophisticated techniques by investors

    and other stakeholders. Notably, the uses of financial ratios are;

    a) Making investment and credit decision (welsch et al).b) A tool of communicating economic situation of entity from obsolete figures in financial

    statement.

    c) A predicting model to project whether a firm would fail or otherwised) Evaluating the stewardship of management by way of their performance over a given

    period of time.

    e) Assessing efficiently and effectively the assets of the company have been employed orused over a period of time.

    f) Assessing the risk association with investment in a given company.g) Inter-firm comparison (Yiadom 1999).

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    8/10

    h) Trend analysis.i) Estimating marketing risk.

    2.4 USERS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT RATIOS

    The main users of financial statement ratios include shareholder and potential shareholders,

    creditors, tenders, government for taxation and statistical purposes particularly through their

    trade unions as well as management.

    The interest of the various parties or shareholders has been summarized in Table 1.

    Table.1. Main users of financial statement ratios.

    Parties with immediate interest Types of ratios

    Potential suppliers of goods on creditors,

    tenders. Example bank managers, debenture

    holders and management

    Liquidity or credit risk. Ratio indicate how

    well equipped the business is to pay its way.

    Shareholders (i.e. actual and potential)

    potential takeover bidders, lenders,

    management, competitive firms, tax authorizes

    and employees.

    Profitability: how successful is the business

    trading.

    Shareholders (actual and potential) potential

    takeover bidders, tenders, management,

    competitive firms, employment.

    Users of assets: how effectively are assets of

    firms utilized?

    Shareholders (actual and potential) potential

    takeover bidders, tenders, management,

    creditors in assessing risk.

    Capital structure: how does the capital

    structure of the firm affects the cost of capital

    and return to shareholders

    Shareholders (actual and takeover bidders,

    management).

    Investment: show how the market prices for a

    share reflected on the companys performance.

    Source: Frank wood vol.2, sixth edition, page463.

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    9/10

    2.5 LIMITATION OF FIANACIAL STATEMENT RATIO

    In spite of the wide use of financial statement ratios, this technique has a number of limitations.

    Due to these limitations, ratios must be interpreted with great care.

    Some of these limitations are;

    I) When the data which ratios are based on historical book value do not reflect;a) Price level effectsb) Current market values.

    This brings to therefore the effect of inflation/deflation on certain items in the financial statement

    of companies. Notable examples are;

    1) It increases the nominal value of work in progress and inventory profits are not a realincome except to the extent that the inventory appreciates faster than general price level.

    2) As inflation progress the net book value of fixed assets become more and more out offixed data i.e. the book value understates current value of replacement cost. Depreciation

    schedules that are based on book value may provide misleading picture change in current

    value of the assets of the company.

    3) It also has effect on the net profit of companies that borrow. Lenders are backed ininflation currencies so they demand a higher interest on their loans. Pandey (1991).

    Brigham (1995) also outlines limitations of ratios which are;

    I) Ratios represent average conditions that exist in the past. They are based on historicaldata that incorporate all the peculiarities of the past. The financial analysis is interest

    in what happens in the future whiles ratios indicate what happens in the past.

    Management of the company get information about the companys plans and policies

    and therefore is able to predict the future better than the outsider.

  • 8/7/2019 main chapter two

    10/10

    II) The method of computing each ratio is not standardized. Therefore the computationcan be influenced by data selections choice. Thus, it is difficult to decide on proper

    basis of comparison.

    III) Situations of two or more comparison are not the same. Similarly the factorsinfluencing the companies in one year may change in another year. Thus the

    comparison of the ratios of two or more companies difficulties and become

    meaningless when they are operating under different situations such as product lines,

    methods of finance and geographical locations. Also the uses of different accounting

    methods obscure inter-firm comparison.

    IV) The use of alternative accounting method may also have significant effect on the useof financial ratios. For instance the use of first-in first-out (FIFO) versus last-in first-

    out (LIFO) stock valuation purposes and /or the use of straight line versus accelerated

    depreciation.

    V) Change in accounting estimate and principles such as a change in FIFO to LIFO mayaffect the ratio of the year of change. Also to develop that data for a long-term, its

    may necessary to adjust the data, the effect usual and non-recurring items and extra-

    ordinary items.

    VI) All other investors have the same data available and can compute the same ratios.Studies have shown that the market vary quickly and absorbs this information. As a

    result, it is extremely difficult to consistently earn above average returns on stock

    investments by relying on publicly available information. This is why probably there

    is excessive reliance on ratio analysis. Welsch and Latkonch (1986).

    VII) Firms can employ window dressing techniques to make their financial statementslook better than they really are.

    VIII) A firm may have some ratios which look good and others which look bad makingit difficult to tell whether the company is, on balance, strong, or weak.